Upload
others
View
17
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
In recent years, the progress made in operational
techniques and the continuous improvement of the
physical, chemical and mechanical characteristics
of reconstruction materials have made it possible
for dentists to focus their attention on the constant
pursuit of the best aesthetic restoration results.
Patients asking for aesthetic restorations want
them to integrate with their natural teeth. Dentists,
therefore, should not only rely on scientifically
validated techniques to restore dental biology but
also be guided by their sense for aesthetics in
order to reproduce the polychromatic and
anatomical characteristics of teeth, so that
restorations are ultimately unnoticeable.
In philosophical terms, the word ‘aesthetics’
indicates the “science of beauty, liberal arts and
gnoseology, closely related to logics”, i.e. the
beauty and outward appearance of something. In
dentistry, a restoration is aesthetic when it best
matches the color, shape and function of what it
replaces.
The physiological behavior of teeth, in fact, is the
result of a close interaction between mechanical,
biological, functional and aesthetic properties. This
is where composite inlays come into play.
INDIRECT AESTHETIC
RESTORATIONS
IN CONSERVATIVE
DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE
DR. ALBERTO PUJIA
ODT. PAOLO RICCIONI
FIGURE 1 INITIAL QUADRANTS
INTRODUCTION
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
2
The current composite resin
formulations have improved the
characteristics of materials through
the size, shape, concentration and
type of filler used.
Shrinkage caused by curing has
been reduced while tensile and
flexural strength as well as
resistance to abrasion and long
term color stability have increased.
Add to all this the benefits of high
power curing lights, in combination
with heat and pressure, that
improve the quality of the
polymerization reaction.
In recent years, two factors, at
least, have contributed to the
development of aesthetic inlays
and onlays:
o continuous innovation in
enamel and dentin adhesives,
which provide a high bond
strength of the composite to
dentin and enamel
o increased and constant request
for aesthetic restorations on
the part of patients.
Composite offers several
advantages: it does not require
large thicknesses, it provides a
good marginal precision and the
possibility to correct shape and
color, it is easy to repair, and lab
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
FIGURE 2 INITIAL QUADRANT 1
FIGURE 3 RUBBER DAM ISOLATION
FIGURE 4 IMPRESSION TAKING
FIGURE 5 INLAYS IN THE STONE CAST
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
3
procedures are not complex.
Indeed, it (almost) matches
several of the most significant
qualities of ceramic materials
(resistance to wear, long-term
aesthetics, high stability) while
offering remarkable advantages in
terms of lower investment and less
complex laboratory procedures, the
possibility to perform intraoral
corrections and repair, a more
conservative cavity preparation,
effective polishing, and a lower
frailty and tendency to fracture. In
particular, the modulus of elasticity
(a body’s rigidity or flexure),
resilience (the ability to absorb
stress up to the breaking/failing
point) and fatigue strength
(rupture after dynamic stress is
applied) are the mechanical
properties that, unlike with ceramic
systems, make it possible to work
with lower thicknesses of
composite material, which is also
less subject to breakage.
Indirect composite restorations
such as inlays, onlays and overlays
can be made with both dental
office and laboratory composites,
without distinction.
Composite has three phases:
matrix, filler and bonding agent.
The most commonly used organic
phase in composite materials
mainly consists of Bis-GMA and/or
UDMA together with other resins
with a lower molecular weight.
Fillers are those substances that
are added to increase the strength
FIGURE 6 PROSTHETIC ARTIFACTS
FIGURE 7 TRY-IN OF INLAYS
FIGURE 8 JUST CEMENTED INLAYS
FIGURE 9 3 MONTH FOLLOW UP
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
4
of the resin:
o macro particles (8-25 microns)
o fine particles (1-8 microns)
o micro particles (0.04-0.2 microns)
The composite used for this clinical
case was Estelite Sigma Quick by
Tokuyama Dental.
Estelite Sigma Quick is a light-
curable and radiopaque,
submicron-filled composite resin,
containing 82% by weight (71% by
volume) of composite filler and
zirconia/silicate filler. Thanks to
these filler particles, shrinkage
caused by curing is reduced. Each
inorganic particle in the composite
is submicronic (average size of the
particles is 0.2 µ, in a range from
0.1 to 0.3 µm) and this preserves
brightness and resistance to wear
to a very high degree. The
monomeric matrix contains Bis-
GMA and triethylene glycol
dimethacrylate.
Knowledge of the fundamental
principles of adhesive dentistry is a
prerequisite when working with
composite in order to obtain good
levels of aesthetic-functional
integration of the restoration and
long-term duration.
Adhesive cavities do not foresee
retentions, internal sharp edges
CAVITY
PREPARATION
FIGURE 10 INITIAL QUADRANT 2
FIGURE 11 INLAYS IN THE STONE CAST
FIGURE 12 TRY-IN OF INLAYS
FIGURE 13 JUST CEMENTED INLAYS
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
5
shall be avoided and a rounded
cavity has to be prepared to
facilitate the flowing of composite
cement. When preparing the cavity
for indirect adhesive restorations,
the principle of maximum tissue
preservation shall be observed and
the shape of the cavity depends on
the extension of the caries or the
presence of pre-existing
restorations to be replaced.
The clinical procedure includes two
sessions: the first one to prepare
and take the impression, and the
second one to cement the
composite restoration.
Ideally, cavity preparation entails
that the lateral walls converge
towards the bottom of the cavity
by approx. 15-18 degrees, that
minimum thickness is approx. 1.5-
2 mm, that there is an approx. 2
mm wide isthmus, that the
cavosurface angle is not beveled
and that enamel prisms are regular.
When the general design of the
cavity is predetermined, as when
replacing old restorations, the
cavity preparation has to be
adapted to adhesive techniques.
Adhesive restorations require a
conical shape with clear-cut
margins and the filling of any
undercuts with composite material,
in order to avoid excessively
invasive preparations. After
finishing the preparation, the
dentinal substrate is properly
treated to protect tooth vitality, if
FIGURE 14 INITIAL QUADRANT 3
FIGURE 15 TRY-IN OF INLAYS
FIGURE 16 ETCHING
FIGURE 17 JUST CEMENTED INLAYS
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
6
any. Then, after removing the
rubber dam, an impression is taken
of both the arch to be rehabilitated
and of the opposite arch, and the
intermaxillary relationship is
recorded with wax and face bow,
which is what the dental technician
needs to subsequently mount the
casts on the articulator.
Preparations can now be
provisionalised with light-curable
Eugenol-free provisional cement.
At the cementation stage, the
artifacts delivered by the
laboratory have already been
subjected to a post-polymerization
cycle which, thanks to the
combination of light, heat and
pressure, provides the inlay with
physical and mechanical
characteristics which are absolutely
superior to those of direct
restorations.
The already sandblasted and
silanized inlays are then cleansed
and conditioned with an enamel-
dentin adhesive. After removing
provisional cement and placing the
rubber dam, cavities are cleaned
and cleansed so as to remove all
residues of dental and cavity
surfaces; congruity of artifacts is
then checked and cementation
procedure is started.
CEMENTATION
FIGURE 18 INITIAL QUADRANT 4
FIGURE 19 IMPRESSION
FIGURE 20 ETCHING
FIGURE 21 JUST CEMENTED INLAYS
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
7
Cavities are sandblasted with particles having a size of 30 microns, at 2 bar pressure, for
approximately 10 seconds; etching is performed with 36.5-37.5% orthophosphoric acid for approx.
40 seconds; cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine is carried out to inhibit metalloproteinase and after
applying the primer/bonding agent (EnaBond, Micerium). A uniform layer of pre-heated composite
(37-39 degrees C) is then placed into the cavity, after which the inlay/onlay is seated and kept in
situ by exerting constant pressure. Excess cement is removed before its polymerization, and
dental floss is used to remove it also from interproximal areas. Curing with UV radiation is
performed on all sides for at least 2 minutes per side, while exerting constant occlusocervical
pressure on the prosthetic artifact. Once curing is complete, coarse composite residues on the
margins are removed and 40 micron diamond burrs and silicone trimmers are used for finishing.
After checking marginal congruity, occlusion is also checked, followed by finishing and polishing.
In another session, final polishing and glossing can be performed under a rubber dam.
FIGURE 22 INITIAL QUADRANT AND FINAL CHECK
BEFORE
AFTER
INDIRECT AESTHETIC RESTORATIONS IN CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY DAILY PRACTICE DR. ALBERTO PUJIA & ODT. STEFANO RICCIONI
8
° Liebler M, Devigus A, Randall RC,
Burke FJ, Pallesen U, Cerutti A,
Putignano A, Cauchie D, Kanzler R,
Koskinen KP, Skjerven H, Strand GV,
Vermaas RW.: “Ethics of esthetic
dentistry.3M ESPE, St.Paul,
Minnesota;
° D.Dietschi, DMD, J.M. Dietschi, DMD:
“Current Developments in Composite
Materials and Techniques” Practical
Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry
Vol. 8; Num. 7 Sept. 1996 603-
613;“Adhésion et Collages La
Révolution Silencieuse” Académie de
Dentisterie Adhésive Paris-La
Défanse 7-8 Mai 1999;
° Acquaviva G.L., Breschi L., Di
Leonarda R., Piana G, Chersoni S.
Prati C.; “Adesione e adesivi fra
ricerca e clinica: stato dell’arte.” – Il
dentista moderno 2004;
° Dietschi D. “Evalutation of marginal
and internal adaptation of adesive
class II restorations.” PHD Tesys
2003;
° Spreafi co R., Dietschi D., “Restauri
adesivi non metallici. Attuali concetti
per il trattamento estetico dei denti
posteriori” Milano Scienza e tecnica
Dentistica Ed. internazionali srl,
1998;
° Asmussen e., Peutzfeld A. “The eff
ect of secondary curing o resin
composite on adherence of resin
cement” J Adhes. Dent. 2000;
2:315-318;
° Prati C., Tay F., Breschi L. Ferrieri P.
Chersoni S., Suppa P.: “Alterazioni
dell’integrità marginale e
permeabilità marginale dello strato
ibrido e dei sistemi adesivi.”
Odont.Ades.Ric. Oggi II sess. 2004;
° Gallottini L., Guida A., Mancini R.,
Loghi S., Nicosia D.: “Le microinfi
ltrazioni nelle ricostruzioni indirette.
Studio in vitro ed analisi al SEM della
tecnica del rebonding.” Gio. It.
Cons.- suppl. vol II-n.4 Ott.-Dicem.
2004;
° Pappalardo A., Rapisarda E.: “Intarsi
in composito e tecniche di
cementazione: prove di microinfi
ltrazione e analisi al SEM” Gio. It.
Cons.- suppl. vol II -n.4 Ott.-Dicem.
2004;
° Putignano A., Maggetti M., Rappelli G,
Sabbatucci A., Memè L.: Restauri di
II classe: test di microinfi ltrazione in
vitro”. Gio. It. Cons.- suppl. vol II –
n.4 Ott.-Dicem. 2004;
° Vanini L. - Mangani F. - Klimovskaia
O.: “Il restauro conservativo dei
denti anteriori” Editore: Promodent-
Acme sas Anno: 2004;
° Poskus L.T, Latempa A.M.A., Maurício
Alves Chagas M.A., da Silva E.M., da
Silva Leal M.P., Guimaraes J.G.A.:
“Infl uence of Post-cure treatments
on hardness and marginal adaptation
of composite resin inlay restorations:
an in vitro study” J Appl Oral Sci.
2009;17(6):617-22;
° Acquaviva P.A., Cerutti F., Adami G.,
Gagliani M., Ferrari M., Gherlone E,
Cerutti A.: “Degree of conversion of
three composite materials employed
in the adhesive cementation of
indirect restorations: A micro-Raman
analysis”- journal of dentistry
37(2009) 610-615;
° Cantoro A., Goracci C., Carvalho C.A.
Coniglio I., Ferrari M.: “Bonding
potential of self-adhesive luting
agents used at diff erent
temperatures to lute composite
onlays” - journal of dentistry
37(2009) 454-461.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
FIGURE 23 INITIAL UPPER AND LOWER ARCHES
FIGURE 24 UPPER AND LOWER ARCHES,
FINAL CHECK AFTER 1 YEAR