Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
State of Palestine
Indicators of the Rightsof the Palestinian Child
December 2012
State of Palestine
December 2012
Indicators of the Rightsof the Palestinian Child
Education
Protection
Disability
Child Participation
Health
This document is based on the Palestinian National Authority Report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the Occupied Palestinian Territory which was issued in December 2010 and stressed on the importance of developing separate indicators based on the rights of the child and not only their welfare. Palestinian children constitute almost 50% of the population, so developing such indicators will contribute to the developing of statistics on the Palestinian child, analyzing the situation of the Palestinian children’s lives regardless of where they live or their health and socio-economic conditions, and identifying the gaps in their receiving quality services. This will, definitely, enrich the process of drawing potential national policies and plans to enable the Palestinian children reach their maximum and ensure their receiving of their rights in all aspects based on realistic, reliable, and comparable information, data, and evidences.
To quote, please refer to the document as follows:Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child, 2012, Ramallah - Palestine
For Correspondence:Palestinian Central Bureau of StatisticsP. O. Box: 1647Ramallah – PalestineTel: (972/970) 2 298 2700Fax: (972/970) 2 298 2710Email: [email protected]: http://www.pcbs.gov.ps
This document was prepared with the financial and technical support of Save the Children, and with the participation of all Palestinian organizations
We would like to extend our gratitude to everyone who contributed to preparing this document and developing the indicators, and also those who participated in the national and internal workshops from all the concerned ministries, civil society organizations and UNRWA, especially the Sectoral Committee Coordinators:
Khalid Abu Khalid - Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Faten Abu Qare’ - Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Dr. Waleed Al-Khatib – Ministry of Health
Dr. Jawad Al-Bitar - Ministry of Health
Dr. Kawther Al-Mughrabi - Ministry of Social Affairs
Hanaa’ Al-Qaimary – Ministry of Social Affairs
Sonya Helou - Ministry of Social Affairs
Ziad Amro - Ministry of Social Affairs
Raed Nazzal - Ministry of Social Affairs
Munjid Suleiman – Ministry of Education
Amal Hammad - Ministry of Education
Waleed Mousa - Higher Council of Youth and Sports
Fadwa Al-Shae’r – Ministry of Interior
Mohammad Daraghmeh – Ministry of Culture
Ma’moun Al-Odeh – Ministry of Labour
Dr. Cairo Arafat- Save the Children
Lubna Iskander- Save the Children
Iman Barghouthi- Save the Children
PrefaceThe main purpose of this document is to identify and present a list of national child rights- based indicators for Palestine, based on standardized definitions, and specific sources of information, that allow for routine data collection and updates. This was achieved through direct dialogue with partner institutions to identify their needs and priorities in the field of statistical data and indicators implementation. This document sums up the efforts taken to guarantee the necessary requirements of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC); which is a vital tool protecting the rights of the child at the local, national and international level.
We, at the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS), have the responsibility of ensuring the availability of all official statistics to reflect the reality of the Palestinian child through our annual child statistics report, which is responsive to the rights of the Palestinian child, and is in harmony with the UNCRC and the Palestinian Child Law (PCL). This document clarifies our role in implementing the UNCRC by making available all the information needed, and most importantly, to highlight the indicators that are not currently available, and the efforts needed to collect them on a periodic basis, to provide a better understanding of the real situation of the Palestinian children’s rights.
We hope that this document will guide the government programs that target policies, practices and available services for the Palestinian community, young and old, to live peacefully in dignity and freedom, especially Palestinian Children. Our children constitute almost half of the Palestinian community. The investment in children will allow children and the community to continue prospering through guaranteeing their rights and better opportunities.
Ola Awad
President of PCBS
6
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................7
Methodology ..........................................................................................................................................................................9
Role of the PCBS and the partner institutions .................................................................................. 10
What are Child Rights-Based Indicators? ............................................................................................. 13
The importance of developing child rights-based indicators ............................................... 13
Criteria of good indicators .................................................................................................................................... 16
Types of indicators ........................................................................................................................................................ 18
General qualitative indicators ............................................................................................................................ 20
a. Legislative framework ...........................................................................21
b. Availability of information, analysis and dissemination ........................22
c. Policy and planning framework ............................................................23
d. Monitoring and evaluation ....................................................................24
e. Awareness raising, capacity development and partnership building ..... 24
Priorities of national indicators ........................................................................................................................ 26
Gaps and obstacles ........................................................................................................................................................ 49
Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 50
Way forward ........................................................................................................................................................................ 51
Annexes:
- Annex 1: List of all indicators that were discussedduring the workshops ................................................................................................................ 53
- Annex 2: List of invitees and participants in thenational and internal workshops .................................................................................... 73
7Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
IntroductionThis document represents the Palestinian Government’s efforts to meet the needs of Palestinian children and is a confirmation of the State of Palestine’s (SP) commitment towards implementing the Convention of the Rights of the Child and adopting it as a binding and valid legal document by which all practices that target Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territories should be guided. It is based on the Palestinian Basic Law, Palestinian Child Law (7) of 2004, and the Amended Child Law. The SP prepared a report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)1 with the participation of governmental and non-governmental organizations concerned with child issues. The report entailed comprehensive information on the measures taken by the PNA to implement the rules of the agreement, and stressed on the most important achievements and the efforts made to improve the quality of life of children and identify the obstacles that prevent children from fulfilling their potential and ensuring their right to survival, growth, life and participation.
The report emphasized the importance of developing and monitoring children’s rights based indicators with clear roles and responsibilities for organizations. This is to assist decision makers and planners to identify gaps and to base policies on facts and evidence; which will ensure timely and quality services for the intended beneficiaries. This document on the indicators of the rights of the Palestinian child forms part of the policy documents that the government developed to serve all governmental and non-governmental institutions in monitoring the implementation of child rights in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The CRC and its key principles of non-discrimination, participation, accountability and the best interests of the child formed the basic foundation and starting point towards a comprehensive process of consultation and agreement on national children’s rights indicators.
Article four of the CRC states that “state parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative, administrative and other measures for the implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention”. This includes self monitoring and assessment as a commitment from the government and also independent monitoring through parliamentary committees and NGOs.
General comment (5) of the child rights committee stipulates the importance of collecting and analyzing sufficient and reliable data on children to determine discrimination and disparity in realizing the rights of child; and to implement the indicators on the national level. Guiding principles also call for preparation and submission of periodical reports, and also for collecting categorized statistics and gathering information that cover all the aspects of the convention. In addition,
1 The Palestinian National Authority Report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. PCBS, December, 2010 with the support of Save the Children
8
evaluating collected data and assessing progress in implementing the convention in order to identify problems and inform development policies related to children.
Taking into consideration that the CRC and its optional protocols are a continuously developing set of documents, developing indicators based on the rights of the child is a continuous process that calls for us to stop and think if we are proceeding on the right path and asking the right questions to properly identify the gaps and marginalized groups. This will ensure we take the right decisions and direct resources based on reliable and adequate information in order to build an independent Palestinian State on strong foundations.
To address the issue effectively, there must be political will. Knowing that many countries that enjoy political stability and have adequate human and financial resources have not fulfilled the whole spectrum of child rights, the SP is making efforts at both the governmental and civic level to develop and institutionalize child right indicators, despite the unstable political and economic situation. This does not mean that we, as a state, should stand aside and do nothing with the excuse of not having enough resources or due to the current political situation. On the contrary, work should be done gradually, persistently, with national efforts, and with cooperation and coordination of all concerned parties towards the development, institutionalization and continuous review of these indicators on the national level as the most effective process to reveal systemic gaps and to inform the allocation and utilization of resources; hence strengthening the SP, Palestinian society and its institutions..
This document aims at developing indicators that are based on the rights of the child to serve three levels of intervention:
Include a number of indicators that are based on the rights of the child in different sectors (health, education, protection, disability and participation), which were selected by the Palestinian governmental institutions in the National Monitoring System, developed by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS), in cooperation with Palestinian related governmental institutions.
Develop the indicators of every sector with the relevant Palestinian ministries based on the rights of the child to enable the SP and its institutions to prepare and submit annual reports, prepare national plans and to monitor and evaluate progress.
Develop the internal technical indicators of services provided by line ministries including specific details on who will receive the services and their current conditions. This will help in developing comprehensive forms on cases of children and their management, and follow up through a unified national system.
9Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Methodology• The CRC is considered the starting point of this work as the work started based
on the results and recommendations of the Palestinian National Authority Report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the Occupied Palestinian Territory2. This report found that there was limited consistency in the types of indicators used to measure child well being and that there were even fewer indicators that actually addressed children’s rights and/or violations.
• The research team on the rights of the child from Save the Children and UNICEF, in coordination with PCBS and the relevant ministries, collected and reviewed a large group of available indicators that related to all the items of the CRC on the national level, based on the indicators stated in the national surveys, reports on child’s statistics; reports, plans, and strategies of the official Palestinian institutions and ministries, work that was accomplished previously in 2000 by the National Plan of Action Secretariat for Children with PCBS; review of the records, files and data centres and bases in the ministries of concern. Indicators that were developed on the international level were also reviewed through the revision of the documents related to the indicators that are based on the rights of the child and the international experience in this regard, in addition to the implementation manual of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child which was developed by UNICEF, health indicators related to the World Health Organization, etc. to enrich the national indicators and harmonize with a rights based approach and in accordance with the Palestinian context.
• Based on that, a list of almost all the possible indicators of the rights of the child in the fields of health, education, participation, disability and protection (poverty, violence, negligence and mistreatment, orphans, child labour, exploitation, etc.) had been drafted to discuss on the national level.
• The PCBS in cooperation with relevant line ministries worked together to exchange information, experience and opinions on the subject of indicators and discuss the first draft. It was agreed that every ministry meet internally and meet with its primary partners in every sector to discuss the indicators of the sector and prioritize the indicators on the national level. This list formed the first stage of indicators that needed to be developed, its definitions and means of its measurements unified, the timeframe needed for that, the proper frequency of measurement on the national level and work to list them in the national policies, plans and regulations (institutionalizing them) and consequently unifying the language among all Palestinian institutions upon discussing the indicators on the
2 The Palestinian National Authority Report on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, December – 2010 with the support of Save the Children UK
10
rights of the child. The detailed list should remain within the procedure manual if the ministries of concern desire to add a new group of indicators and develop them with the partners at a later stage in the coming years (Please review Appendix 1).
• In 25 April 2012, Save the Children, UNICEF and PCBS organized a national workshop to discuss the initial indicators and agree on drafting the national priorities of the indicators of rights of child, their details, measurement methodology and classifications. The workshop was attended by representatives from the governmental sector, civil society organizations, private sector, academics and others concerned with the issues of child and human rights. The workshop was followed by a number of other workshops and internal meetings within specific ministries of concern to revise the list of the indicators of the rights of the child in every sector. Please review Appendix 2 for more information on the institutions that were invited to attend the workshops and who participated in the internal and public discussion.
The role of the PCBS and partner institutionsWhat is the role of PCBS, ministries of concern, civil society, private sector and UNRWA in the development process of indicators based on the rights of the child?
PCBS is considered, as per the Law on State Statistics # (4) of 2000, the national and official body in charge of the overall responsibility on data and statistics collection inside the country and aims at the development and strengthening of the official Palestinian statistical system that is based on legal foundations that regulates the process of data collection, use, storage, analysis and publication for statistical purposes in coordination with the ministries of concern and UNRWA in the fields of health (Ministry of Health), education (Ministry of Education), family and individuals with a disability (Ministry of Social Affairs), labour (Ministry of Labour), culture and recreation (Ministry of Culture, the Higher Council for Youth and Sports and Ministry of Education), and other fields through administrative records. It also collects other data on specific subjects on the national level through periodical national surveys and a population census. Despite that, there is no specific clause that assigns PCBS or any other institution with the task of collecting data on the basic rights of children, or more specifically analyzing any such data.
The mission and tasks of PCBS are as follows:1. Develop and strengthen the official Palestinian statistical system that is based on
legal foundations that regulates the process of data collection and use for statistical purposes.
2. Collection, use, storage, analysis and publication of data in coordination with the ministries of concern in the fields of health, education, family and individuals with disability, labour, culture and recreation, and other fields.
11Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
3. Gather information on the cases and statistics of Palestinian children where PCBS started issuing an annual report on statistics on Palestinian children for two consecutive years (1999 – 2000). However, after that period and after the second Intifada, the report ceased to be published and despite that, PCBS still issues an annual report on children including information on health, social and educational development of the children.
4. Make the information needed for comparison and planning purposes available through national surveys and administrative records in the main institutions and ministries.
5. Raise public awareness by providing information through the media and cooperation with universities and other research institutions.
6. Actively participate in building and developing the administrative and central records.
7. Conduct the general population census and others. 3
Ministries of concern are collecting data and monitoring the implementation of their programs in the national plans and the indicators of the designated sector through administrative records, data centres and their monitoring and evaluation departments on the level of directorates, and on the central and national levels where the designated data of each sector is received from all partners in the private and civil sectors, and UNRWA. However, the data is occasionally not received at the right time to submit the reports and it is not detailed, classified or recorded according to the required criteria. The government, represented by its various institutions, submits quarterly and annual periodical reports to the cabinet and the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) to monitor its progress and the degree it is implementing its plans and programs, as well as identifying weaknesses in its implementation. The Ministry of Finance also submits detailed information on the allocated budget for every sector; however, it doesn’t allocate a specific budget for children.
3 For more information on the roles and authorities of PCBS, please review the Law of State Statistics # (4) of 2000.
Therefore, if the information was not unified, coherent and/or specific in terms of a timeframe and target group, within certain and unified criteria, and if it doesn’t follow a unified sectoral approach, it will be hard to use it on the national level to identify the gaps, specify responsibilities and accountability, and compare the progress through different interventions and consequently it will be difficult to plan based on confirmed information, evidence and events.
12
The following graph represents the vision of the different information resources; governmental, civil society, private sector, UNRWA, international civil society, UN, higher education and research institutions through use of administrative records, surveys, research and studies, and through the children themselves to feed into a national system to collect, analyze and monitor the data:
National indicators (Unified national database to collect and analyze data within PCBS or (within the national monitoring system)).
Surveys Research Administrative Records
Governmental, non-governmental, private sector, UNRWA, international civil society institutions and children
There is a need to specify the role, mandate, responsibility and division of labor between governmental, civil society and private sector agencies addressing children’s issues. The establishment of a National Council for the Child needs to be prioritized and specific terms of reference and mandate be identified taking into consideration other existing institutions like the Palestinian Independent Commission on Human Rights and the High Council for Motherhood and Childhood. This will require a detailed analysis of their roles in gathering, analyzing and using the information based on unified and solid foundations, criteria, and methodologies that flow to a unified body to ensure the thoroughness, creditability, non- duplication, monitoring and analysis of the data properly; especially data and information that constitutes an influence and a source of power from one hand and responsibility on the other hand to take the right decision, direct the national resources according to national priorities, ensure the delivery of services and aids to recipients, and prevent the duplication of programs that do not prove their effectiveness or improperly utilize resources. The proper analysis of information helps in decision making on how to deal with certain issues; either continue with the same methodology or develop new methodologies or ways to deal with such issues.
13Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
What are Child Rights - Based indicators? Most indicators being developed in the OPT and the information gathered tend to be grounded on the basis of the welfare of the child and not on the basis of the rights of the child. In order for the principle of rights - based governance to be achieved in realizing the rights of the child; detailed, creditable and analyzed information and data should be published on the actual conditions in which the children live and in all sectors, the responsibility of all institutions and individuals in realizing the rights of the child in the OPT as stated by the law should be specified, as well as how the principle of children’s participation is reflected, which seeks to cover their best interest, indiscrimination and equality in law, legislation and national policy and plans while taking into consideration the national and local context, children’s point of view, and hearing the voice of children.
The following table represents a comparison between the indicators of welfare and rights:
Indicators of the Rights of the Child Indicators of WelfareReflect the actual situation of children and marginalized groups who cannot access or get services, their locations, the reasons for non-access, and the nature of interaction between the child, state and society in the issues that relate to the child.
Reflect the actual situation of children in general, or the ones who receive the services, state achievements, certain program, or certain need. Welfare based indicators typically address program outcomes and target groups and do not take into consideration those populations that may not be accessing services or programs. So they are a measure of welfare for those receiving services primarily.
Detailed and classified by sex, age, location, time period, socio-economic situation.
Tend to be general in most cases.
Reflect responsibilities and consequently accountability.
Do not reflect responsibilities and consequently accountability.
Emerged from a certain commitment by the state as per national and international laws.
Not necessarily emerged from the law.
Example: Percentage of children not receiving vaccines, reason, their location.
Example: Percentage of children receiving vaccines.
The importance of developing Child Rights - Based indicators• SP is committed to implement the principles of good governance based on
accountability and transparency, therefore, it consider these indicators and monitoring them as a means to ensure the implementation of government’s obligations in the field of the rights of the child, the extent of enforcing the laws or the need to modify them and the impact on the current policies on children; and ensure transparency and accountability based on the specific targets in the national plans, policies and programs.
14
• These indicators form a guide for national policy makers to improve the conditions of the child and develop their capabilities to uphold their rights and ensure workers with children and policy and legal regulations and frameworks fulfill their duties, and to mobilize support and solidarity with child - related issues based on evidence, information and data.
• Indicators are considered a monitoring tool of the changes on the level of programs, services and other fields, the extent to which the government implements the different laws and regulations that contribute to the preserving and protection of the rights of the child, and monitor and document the violations of the rights of the child; yet the issue of indicators and data collection requires political will, due to its importance in determining and evaluating the extent to which the government fulfills its responsibilities, effectiveness in managing the public resources, identifying its direction and what’s needed from it, and monitoring that is not only on the level of meeting the basic needs or from a charitable perspective, but also as a natural and earned right. Indicators based on rights are clear and specify the parties responsible to ensure transparency, accountability, monitoring and evaluation of different interventions. Therefore, these indicators should be institutionalized and emerge from the national systems, policies and plans to monitor progress achieved in a program’s implementation to guarantee the rights of the child.
• Indicators are considered a means to agree on the basic priorities (quantity and quality) raised in every sector of child development according to specific criteria which helps in the preparation of national and international reports that are unified, and have the same language on the situation of the rights of the child in the OPT. The criteria of measuring and implementing the rights of the child as well as in preparing the reports related to it are not clear. The information gathering from different parties and by continuously changing criteria on the population groups, definitions, timeframe, age groups, locations, methodology and others led to a huge amount of data that is hard to compare and in most cases doesn’t have a benchmark or base year.
• Specifying the criteria and the presence of detailed and reliable indicators enables us to compare and identify the scope and forms of the progress achieved, evaluate the different interventions and reasons of their success and failures, and identify the gaps and weak spots in the field of the rights of the child to direct the parties responsible towards developing proper policies, mechanisms and strategies of intervention based on detailed facts and evidences, set the plans and procedures needed to protect such rights, and identify what intervention could work based on the available information to achieve the desired goals and target the marginalized groups to achieve social justice and equality to the extent possible.
15Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
• Despite the fact that different ministries mostly develop indicators to help institutions in evaluating the national plans and strategies, identifying gaps, and submitting reports on their achievements or on implementing a program; and most of these surveys depend on external funding and were not yet established as main national surveys, that happens sometimes according to a specific need or request for a certain program , this led to certain indicators being imposed that were based on the type of project funded or on a need by a certain group; thus most of them are getting repeated. Therefore, periodical reports in the field of the rights of the child should be issued in a unified, methodological way and which allows for an understanding of the trends and patterns related to the implementation of the rights of the child in the country, especially given that surveys on children’s access to protection are still rare due to the lack of focus by the donors to support them in this field.
• In general, national surveys conducted by PCBS4 mostly include more information on the violations of the rights than the administrative records as they include all the areas of OPT, benefit from the national census in preparing the sample society. Administrative records currently include information on the ones who receive a certain service (regularity in education, vaccines, birth records, children in dispute with the law, etc.) and do not give any data on children that have no access to such services and why.
So, this document was prepared to be a living document, and these indicators represent drafts to be modified to monitor the situation of the rights of the child and not only their welfare. Therefore, national discussions were based on the importance of agreement and, in some instances, the development of a certain methodology to measure and analyze these indicators based on the “smart” (specific, measurable, accurate, reliable, and time specific) criteria in terms of accuracy of definition, ability to measure, and availability and credibility of information; and to ensure that they reflect the actual current situation and identify the right time to measure them to reveal the norm, and not temporary changes in the situations and identify the reasons for those changes.
This document does not aim at the institutionalization of all the indicators at this time but to develop them gradually through a mid to long term range policy that specifies national definitions, clear methodologies and whatever database is needed that enables the submission of periodical and immediate reports and monitoring of the situations of the children in the OPT within a reasonable amount of time to draw policies, develop realistic plans that target the rights of children in all sectors, and bridge the gaps to improve access to the marginalized groups based on unified, valid and nationally agreed upon indicators according to best practices and based on a certain base year.
4 PCBS surveys tend to be more indepth in terms of accessing information from a wide population on what kinds of services, problems, violations they are facing. However, administrative records are sources of information that ministries collect from populations actually receiving their services only. Hence, it is a service based indicator that does not include a general measure of the population.
16
Criteria of good indicators1. To be connected with national and sectoral policies, strategies and plans, and to be able
to be monitored, evaluated and used in the process of policy planning and drawing.
2. To be able not only to measure the development, but also the decrease in the level of development and social isolation too.
3. To be developed with parties of concern including children, governmental and civil society organizations, and the private sector, and not to reflect certain personal interests.
4. To be measurable, reliable,(give the same result each time they are measured using the same methodology with the same timeframe), specific, meaningful, relevant, reflect the reality; and based on sound foundations, evidence and facts in order to put in place better systems for the protection of the children.
5. To have a clear measurement methodology which is simple, easy to interpret, and easy analyze.
6. Allow for collection of disaggregated data.
7. To be stable with time.
8. To be comparable on local and international levels.
9. To have a degree of legal sensitivity to reflect its importance in the laws, legislation, policy, and in developing information gathering mechanisms in a continuous and detailed way, cover all the children, be available for public use.
It is a condition that whoever collects and analyzes data to have the required knowledge on the definition of the indicator, ways of measurement, variables, and the local and national context in terms of legal, legislative, policy, and service frameworks. They should have the required skills to analyze the information based on the context. Another condition is to have standard mechanisms and tools to collect information in terms of target groups, timeframe, frequency , sources of information, how to use the information, the degree of details required, etc.
And since the process of information gathering and analysis requires lots of time and effort, information shouldn’t be gathered unless it has a value and is clear in terms of what information is required, who is the beneficiary, the importance of information is defined and the time/period required to be measured.
Frequency should also be specified based on different factors such as the nature of indicators, how possible it is to get reliable results within that time period, the objective of measurement, the logic behind the time period, the number of variables, international standards and report requirements.
17Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Data and information gathered should be reliable, which means getting the same results on the same indicator within the same time period, if the measurement was repeated by different parties, and this is done through:
• Unifying the standards, definitions and concepts.
• Unified data gathering (methodology).
• Identifying the target group (sample) and the objective of studying the indicator, time period and required details.
• Identifying the sources of and access to information (information ’inside’ an entity or a household is private and hard to get); how complete, classified and reliable the information inside is (an example of the complete records and data classified by sex, geographical location, socio-economic situation, age, etc.).
• Testing the indicator.
• Having all the elements of data recorded and entered accurately.
• Describing and analyzing data in a unified way.
The process can be summarized as follows:
Identifying theindicator, its
definition andthe methodology of
its measurement
Data collection based on study
sampleData Entry Data Analysis
Overlooking any of the previous stages will lead to false results that do not represent the reality, consequently making the results useless in directing the decision makers correctly. In some cases, institutions put their utmost efforts on the first stages of the process rather than data and information analysis. This is because of lack of partnership, distribution of roles with higher education institutions or research centres, or not enough financial and qualified human resources or vision on the issue as a whole. In other cases, the needed resources and efforts are not identifed and targeted to marginalized groups, particularly as they can be hard to access, unlike other groups.
18
Some of the common problems when collecting, analyzing and using data:Information Analysis Information Gathering
Inability to compare, either due to lack of enough description or classification of data, absence of base year, inaccurate methods of data entry by unqualified or untrained individuals, or due to lack of budget.
Study or survey sample does not represent or include marginalized groups due to the difficulty of accessing them (thus requiring more efforts and resources). The team that gathers the information is not specialized, trained, or qualified and doesn’t possess the required skill to understand the context and the vision. Lack of budget to regularly gather information.
Lack of sufficient and qualitative analysis of data by specialists due to lack of role distribution with the higher education institutions or the absence of qualified team in the ministries to analyze the information based on the context and typical changes which leads to misinformed conclusions, confusing decision makers.
Lack of clear methodology; unified definitions, standards, concepts, time periods or due to lack of base year and benchmark.
More effort and resources are used to collect data, but not enough efforts, attention, and resources to analyzing the findings.
Data is incomplete, inaccurate, unreliable or more than required.
Not using the data and information in decision making
Types of indicators:Indicators are classified into three types: structural (legislation/legal frameworks), process (procedural), and outcome (connected to outcomes and results).
Legal, legislative, policy, strategic, standards, budgets
Outcome
Process
Sturctural
19Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
The f
ollo
win
g ta
ble d
escr
ibes
the d
iffer
ence
amon
g th
e var
ious
indi
cato
rs an
d ex
ampl
es o
f the
m:
Out
com
e Ind
icat
ors
Proc
ess I
ndic
ator
sSt
ruct
ural
Indi
cato
rsTy
pe o
f In
dica
tor
Mea
sure
the
cha
nges
tha
t re
late
to
resu
lts th
at c
an b
e co
ntrib
uted
to c
are
and
serv
ices
pro
vide
d an
d ar
e us
ed to
id
entif
y th
e pr
oblem
s or
mon
itor
the
impa
ct o
f ser
vice
s on
the
bene
ficia
ries
for l
ong o
r med
ium
per
iods
.
Des
crib
e ac
tiviti
es a
nd t
asks
req
uire
d to
fina
lize
the
serv
ices
se
t an
d th
e pr
ogra
ms
rela
ted
to u
sing
the
reso
urce
to
achi
eve
a ce
rtai
n go
al, c
ompa
red
to a
ben
chm
ark
or c
erta
in st
anda
rds
acco
rdin
g to
the
law
, po
licy,
strat
egy,
set
stand
ards
; an
d its
qu
ality
, impl
emen
tatio
n an
d ut
iliza
tion
of fu
nds f
or th
em. Th
ey
poin
t to
wha
t exi
sts i
n te
rms o
f wor
k pl
an to
achi
eve t
he p
olic
ies,
strat
egie
s, pr
oced
ures
, aw
aren
ess c
ampa
igns
or m
obili
ze su
ppor
t an
d so
lidar
ity w
ithin
the p
ower
of t
he in
stitu
tion
to fi
naliz
e the
se
rvic
e an
d id
entif
y th
e be
nefic
iarie
s. It
has
to
be c
onne
cted
w
ith re
sults
to re
flect
the q
ualit
y.
Des
crib
e the
gene
ral f
ram
ewor
k th
at sh
ould
be
ava
ilabl
e fo
r th
e sy
stem
or
insti
tutio
n to
pro
vide
ser
vice
s an
d pr
ogra
ms
such
as
exist
ence
of
laws,
legi
slatio
n, p
roto
cols,
po
licy
fram
ewor
k,
strat
egy
and
plan
s, bu
dget
m
echa
nism
, m
obili
ze
supp
ort
and
solid
arity
, ra
ising
lev
el o
f aw
aren
ess,
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion,
co
mpl
aint
s, sta
ndar
ds,
qual
ifica
tions
, au
thor
ities
, m
echa
nism
s to
hear
the v
oice
s and
opi
nion
s of
chi
ldre
n on
all
leve
ls, e
tc.
whi
ch w
ill
guar
ante
e the
requ
ired
resu
lts.
Exam
ple
1:
Mor
talit
y ra
te
amon
g ch
ildre
n or
co
mpl
icat
ions
in
a
cert
ain
life
perio
ds d
ue to
the
lack
of
spec
ializ
ed p
edia
tric
ians
.
Exam
ple
2:
Mor
talit
y ra
te
amon
g ch
ildre
n du
e to
dom
estic
viol
ence
.
Exam
ple
3:
Mor
talit
y ra
te
amon
g ch
ildre
n du
e to
suffo
catio
n or
pla
ying
w
ith to
ys n
ot co
nfor
med
to st
anda
rds.
Exam
ple
4: P
erce
ntag
e of
wor
king
ch
ildre
n.
Exam
ple
5:
Mor
talit
y ra
te
amon
g ch
ildre
n or
rat
e of
mor
bidi
ty, d
ue t
o la
ck o
f suffi
cien
t fina
ncia
l res
ourc
es.
Exam
ple 1
: The p
rese
nce/
num
ber o
f reh
abili
tatio
n pr
ogra
ms f
or
wor
kers
with
chi
ldre
n in
uni
vers
ities
bas
ed o
n th
e pr
otoc
ol, o
r th
e nu
mbe
r and
qua
lity
of sp
ecia
lized
pro
gram
s for
phy
sicia
ns
wor
king
with
child
ren.
Exam
ple
2: Th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n pr
ogra
ms f
rom
do
mes
tic vi
olen
ce.
Exam
ple 3
: The a
vaila
bilit
y of
regu
lar i
nspe
ctio
n pr
oced
ures
on
the s
tand
ards
of c
hild
ren’s
toys
(num
ber o
f qua
lified
and
trai
ned
insp
ecto
rs).
Exam
ple 4
: The a
vaila
bilit
y of p
olic
y and
pro
cedu
res t
o pr
even
t ch
ild la
bour
.
Exam
ple
5: P
erce
ntag
e of
act
ual s
pend
ing
on th
e he
alth
of t
he
child
.
Exam
ple
1: Th
e pr
esen
ce o
f a d
ocum
ent o
r pr
otoc
ol t
hat
defin
es t
he q
ualifi
catio
n of
in
divi
dual
s who
wor
k w
ith c
hild
ren
or th
e qu
alifi
catio
ns s
peci
alist
phy
sicia
ns s
houl
d ha
ve.
Exam
ple
2: Th
e pr
esen
ce o
f a
law t
hat
prot
ects
the c
hild
from
dom
estic
viol
ence
.
Exam
ple
3: Th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
an
artic
le in
th
e law
that
sets
out
spec
ifica
tions
to m
ake
toys
safe
for c
hild
ren.
Exam
ple
4: Th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
law
s th
at
state
the m
inim
um w
orki
ng a
ge an
d na
ture
of
per
miss
ible
wor
k.
Exam
ple
5: Th
e bu
dget
of s
pend
ing
on th
e he
alth
of c
hild
ren.
Definition of Indicator Examples
20
The following graph represents the logical sequence and the correlation of the three indicators together:
Law and its articles Policies and procedures
Results/ outputs
Mortality rate among children
in traffic accidents due to speeding
Procedures to penalize drivers
for speeding
An article to prevent motorists
speeding
Indicators can be qualitative or quantitative. A qualitative indicator can demonstrate what happens or describes the changes over a certain period of time and can measure the quality of particular procedures, policies, laws, services, or programs and their quality, and to what extent they were implemented for the purposes of monitoring and evaluation. The information can then be evaluated to determine an initiative’s efficacy. The quantitative approach measures real numbers and percentages within a certain period of time, providing they identify the target group.
Quantitative indicators such as:Qualitative indicators like the availability of:
• Legislative Framework• Policy and planning framework• Systems• Monitoring and evaluation• Awarness on a specific issue• Capacity building procedures
and programs• Partnership building• Information and analysis
• Number/ rate of children• Number of institutions• Number of centers• Number of workers• Number of specialties• Percentage and amount
of spending... with details and classification of data by location, time, sex, geographical distribution, stage
General Qualitative IndicatorsQualitative indicators should reflect not only the availability of laws, policies or programs but also their quality, the extent of their implementation, quality of implementation; and the ease of which the services can be accessed by children or their parents/guardians, and the extent of their satisfaction. They are measured, usually, every 3-5 years and they are usually measured at the structural and process levels, for example:
21Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Legislative FrameworkThe availability of legal and legislative framework: (Structural)• Does it reflect the best interests of the child?
• Does it identify responsibilities and consequences?
• Are there approved and binding executive regulations?
• Are there legal articles and legislation that define the minimum ages that require protection, according to the general principles of the Convention including non-discrimination, guarantee the right of survival and development , and the best interests of the child, and conditions pertaining to:
• Beginning and end of mandatory education (age and grade)
• Employment
• Hazardous work
• Work full-time or part-time
• Access to information and media
• Criminal responsibility
• Access to medical advice or taking a medical procedure without the parents’ consent
• Deprivation of freedom
• Marriage
• Participation in armed conflicts
• Court testimonial
• Access to passport (travel document)
• Submitting a complaint before a specialized authority
• Participation in administrative and judicial pleadings
• Change of identity and name
• Foster care and guardianship
• Participation in developing policies and plans
• Are there legal and legislative articles to ensure non-discrimination and imposing the required penalties in the case of non-compliance?
• Is there legislation in place to penalize violators?
22
Availability of Information, Analysis, and DisseminationIs there sufficient and reliable information available, and has it been analyzed and published properly and correctly?• Are there measures to collect, provide and distribute information in a national,
systematic, detailed and comprehensive way; and can it be benefited from in the processes of the planning and drawing of policies and legislation on all levels, and submitting comprehensive annual reports on the situation of the rights of the child and their violations?
• Is there a detailed analysis of the child allocated budget by March of every year?
• Is there a periodical report on child service providers including their locations, specialties, training received and qualifications, etc. available?
Examples of the information that should be provided:• Percentage of spending by sector out of the total, and percentage of spending on
the child.
• The number of specialized and technical human resources available and who are needed by type, location, sex, specialty, qualifications, etc.
• Number of institutions that are concerned with children when compared to the population and distribution:
• Hospitals
• Health clinics and centres
• Cultural and youth centres
• Schools
• Kindergartens
• Nurseries
• Daycare homes
• Social care institutions
• Disability rehabilitation centres
• Juvenile centres
Translating the laws and legislation
into executive regulations, policy framework, action plan,
protocols, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, budget tools, tools to
mobilize support, solidarity, and raise levels of awareness, complaint tools and monitoring,
clear and specific authorities, and responsibilities by the government to ensure transparency and accountability, to protect the child and their
rights, and to be developed with their participation and based on detailed,
reliable and comprehensive information.
23Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Policy and Planning FrameworkIs the policy and planning framework, and what it entails of setting the budgets and the required human resources, their qualifications, and plans to develop their capacities and maintain them, identified and available? (Structural)• Are there comprehensive national, approved, and declared measures and strategies
available to ensure the implementation of the Convention in all sectors, and is it able to be implemented with the specified responsibilities and of a high quality?
• Are the needed and sufficient financial and human resources concerned with children, periodical detailed needs-assessments classified by geographical distribution, specialties, sectors, etc. available?
• Is there available a national comprehensive, systematic, and long term plan to train the legal, executive and legislative authority, as well as personnel working with children on the central and field levels on the rights of the child and how to deal with children to ensure their rights and protect them, especially the marginalized and less fortunate groups?
• Are there procedures and measures to help parents and guardians in raising their children and accessing the basic educational, health and social services, especially the marginalized families and families with children who have special needs in a sustainable way that strengthens independence?
• Are there policies to strengthen the decentralization and distribution of roles to ensure access and coverage to all groups and strengthening collective responsibility of the realization of the rights of the children?
• Are there policies and mechanisms to protect the child against violence, abuse, exploitation, negligence, impact of poverty and disability, accidents and their effect, disease and their complications in the household, alternative homes, social care institutions, emergency and temporary child protection centres, nurseries, kindergartens juvenile and arrest centres, school community, and health centres?
• Are there clear protocols that limit the steps that need to be taken by personnel working with children in all sectors in cases of emergency, is there a definition of negligence in all sectors, are there mechanisms of monitoring and accountability in the case of negligence?
• Are there policies to strengthen the role of the child and sense of responsibility towards the self, community and surrounding environment?
Periodically monitoring and evaluating laws, policies and plans to circulate what is successful, modify what
needs to be modified, and suggest new ones according to specific national indicators and mechanisms.
24
Monitoring and EvaluationAre there monitoring and evaluation mechanisms? (Structural)• Is there a system to monitor the implementation of national strategies, policies,
programs and services on all levels of public and private sectors, civil society, and UNRWA to evaluate it to submit feedback in order to develop or suggest the needed legislatives, policies and plans?
• Is there a mechanism to clearly distribute the roles among the different institutions (PCBS, ministries, private and civil sector, human rights institutions, the Supreme Council of Motherhood and Childhood, the National Council of the Rights of the Child, and others) in terms of information gathering and analysis, ensure their creditability, and submitting periodical reports?
In order to achieve the right governance in the field of the rights of the child; mechanisms to raise awareness on the
rights of the child in all levels should be developed, how to access services, report on cases of negligence and error against the child, family and community, and work on providing safe
access to needed information in cooperation with and the responsibility of all governmental, nongovernmental, media
and local community institutions?
Awareness Raising, Capacity Development, and Partnership BuildingAre there mechanisms to raise awareness and capacity and partnership building? (Structural)• Does curriculum entail the general principles of the rights of the child (non-
discrimination, child’s best interest, child’s right in survival, development, health, education and freedom of speech/participation) and case studies?
• Are there measures and mechanisms to strengthen the role of the civil society, municipality councils and municipalities, and building their capacities in protection of children, their access to basic services, and report the cases of negligence and error?
• Are there measures to strengthen the principle of volunteerism, mandatory civil service, and individual responsibility?
• What is the role of media in raising awareness and informing the people on the locations of access services, their rights, and duties on all the levels? And has this role been strengthened and directed?
25Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
• Is there enough awareness on the mechanisms of complaints and monitoring by the child or the people surrounding him on both the local and central levels?
After developing the different frameworks and identifying the criteria, comes the stage of measuring implementation and how the legal, policy, planning, and other framework reflects the implementation programs
of regular and emergency services or supportive services in terms of providing the actual infrastructure, transportation, needed human and
financial resources, the extent of access of services by the recipient and the degree of satisfaction. Have the available resources been used in a strategic and transparent way and in partnership and coordination with all service
providers, degree of satisfaction on such services and their quality through quality process indicators?
26
Prio
ritie
s o
f na
tiona
l ind
ica
tors
in th
e s
ec
tors
of h
ea
lth,
ed
uca
tion,
pro
tec
tions
, dis
ab
ility
, and
pa
rtic
ipa
tion:
56
The r
ight
of c
hild
to h
ealth
and
surv
ival
(Art
icle
s 6, 1
8, 2
4)
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
ls•
Avai
labi
lity
of
spec
ific
laws,
exec
utiv
e re
gulat
ions
, and
auth
oriti
es ba
sed
on th
e rig
hts
of t
he c
hild
and
ens
ure
their
par
ticip
atio
n,
acco
unta
bilit
y, tr
ansp
aren
cy,
equa
lity,
non-
disc
rimin
atio
n, an
d th
e chi
ld’s
best
inte
rest
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
UN
RWA
• PL
C•
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
of H
ealth
Pol
icy a
nd S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g
• Av
aila
ble o
r Una
vaila
ble
• D
egre
e of i
mpl
emen
tatio
n•
Deg
ree
of
satis
fact
ion
on
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d qu
ality
• Av
ailab
ility
of h
ealth
pol
ices,
plan
s, pr
ogra
ms,
budg
ets,
and
com
plai
nt m
echa
nism
s ba
sed
on t
he r
ight
s of
the
chi
ld a
nd e
nsur
es h
is pa
rtici
patio
n,
acco
unta
bilit
y, tra
nspa
renc
y, eq
ualit
y, no
n-di
scrim
inat
ion
and
the
child
’s be
st in
tere
sts
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
UN
RWA
• PL
C•
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
of H
ealth
Pol
icy a
nd S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g•
Inde
pend
ent C
omm
issio
n of
Hum
an R
ight
s
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
mec
hani
sms
mon
itorin
g an
d ev
alua
tion
of t
he l
aws,
polic
ies,
plan
s an
d pr
ogra
ms
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
of H
ealth
Pol
icy a
nd S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g•
UN
RWA
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
m
echa
nism
s to
m
obili
ze
supp
ort,
part
ners
hip
build
ing,
and
rai
se th
e le
vel
of a
war
enes
s on
the
chi
ld’s
right
s in
he
alth
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
of H
ealth
Pol
icy a
nd S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• U
NRW
A•
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roto
cols
and
proc
edur
es o
f m
onito
ring,
eva
luat
ion,
acc
ount
abili
ty a
nd
mec
hani
sms o
f com
plai
nt
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Nat
iona
l Cou
ncil
of H
ealth
Pol
icy a
nd S
trat
egic
Pla
nnin
g•
Inde
pend
ent C
omm
issio
n of
Hum
an R
ight
s•
Att
orne
y Gen
eral
’s O
ffice
• H
ealth
Uni
ons
5 Th
e cur
rent
situ
atio
n of
the i
ndic
ator
s; ho
wev
er, i
t is p
refe
rabl
e to
have
a un
ified
nat
iona
l sou
rce o
f inf
orm
atio
n th
at in
clud
es in
form
atio
n by
all s
ervi
ce ap
plic
ants
(gov
ernm
enta
l, U
NRW
A, p
rivat
e sec
tor,
and
civi
l soc
iety
)6
Plea
ser r
evie
w A
ppen
dix (
1) o
n th
e det
aile
d lis
t of t
he h
ealth
qua
lity s
truc
tura
l ind
icat
ors
General health structural indicators 6
* Av
aila
ble o
r Una
vaila
ble,
Deg
ree o
f im
plem
enta
tion,
Deg
ree o
f sat
isfac
tion
on im
plem
enta
tion
and
qual
ity
27Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
• Av
ailab
ility
of
clear
pro
toco
ls to
dea
l w
ith
emer
genc
y cas
es, m
edica
l neg
ligen
ce, a
nd ab
use
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
UN
RWA
• H
ealth
Uni
ons
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
law
s an
d m
easu
res
for
the
prov
ision
of
fre
e ba
sic
med
ical
ca
re
for
child
ren
unde
r 18
year
s of a
ge
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Min
istry
of F
inan
ce
• Av
ailab
ility
of
th
e ne
eded
, sy
stem
atic
and
unifi
ed tr
ainin
g fra
mew
ork
in th
e field
of h
ealth
ed
ucat
ion
and
right
s and
hea
lth o
f the
child
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• Pr
ivat
e Sec
tor
• U
NRW
A•
Avai
labi
lity
of
proc
edur
es
to
prev
ent
disa
bilit
y, co
mpl
icat
ions
an
d de
pend
ence
th
roug
h ea
rly d
etec
tion,
pre
vent
ion,
rai
sing
the l
evel
of a
war
enes
s and
early
inte
rven
tion
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• Pr
ivat
e Sec
tor
• U
NRW
A•
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s to
red
uce
and
prev
ent a
ccid
ents
• M
inist
ry of
Hea
lth –
Med
ical I
nstit
utio
n to P
reve
nt R
oad A
ccid
ents
• M
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
• M
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r - P
olic
e
• Av
ailab
ility
of
pr
oced
ures
to
co
mba
t co
mm
unica
ble a
nd n
on-c
omm
unica
ble d
iseas
es•
Min
istry
of H
ealth
• U
NRW
A
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
mea
sure
s7 to
redu
ce m
orta
lity
rate
of
infa
nts,
child
ren
unde
r fiv
e ye
ars
of
age,
and
mot
hers
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
nat
iona
l pol
icie
s on
the h
ealth
of
adol
esce
nts a
nd sa
fe ac
cess
to in
form
atio
n•
Min
istry
of H
ealth
• M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
psy
chol
ogic
al a
ssist
ance
for
ch
ildre
n by
age
, de
velo
pmen
tal
need
s an
d lik
elih
ood
of ex
posu
re to
dan
ger
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• U
NRW
A
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
reso
urce
s allo
cate
d to
dev
elop
co
nsul
tatio
n an
d re
habi
litat
ion
serv
ices
fri
endl
y to
you
ng
adol
esce
nts
and
avai
labl
e w
ithou
t the
cons
ent o
f par
ents
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• U
NRW
A
• Av
aila
bilit
y of
m
easu
res
to
impr
ove
the
nutr
ition
al in
dica
tors
and
heal
thy l
ife p
atte
rns
amon
g ch
ildre
n an
d ad
oles
cent
s
• M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth•
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
• U
NRW
A
General health structural indicators
7 Pr
oced
ures
and
mea
sure
s inc
lude
wha
t the
stat
e po
ssib
ly c
ondu
cts i
n te
rms o
f rev
iew
s, m
onito
ring,
esta
blish
ing
of sp
ecia
l fun
ds o
r nat
iona
l bod
ies,
awar
enes
s cam
paig
ns; p
rovi
de p
olic
ies,
legi
slatio
n, la
ws,
strat
egie
s and
tr
ansp
orta
tion
supp
ort
28
Base
Yea
r 201
1
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
(Cur
rent
ly)
Freq
uenc
yD
efini
tion
Com
men
tsIn
dica
tors
of t
he q
ualit
y of h
ealth
serv
ices
pro
vide
d:
Num
ber
of q
ualifi
ed a
nd l
icen
sed
med
ical
tea
ms;
thei
r cl
assifi
catio
n,
distr
ibut
ion,
se
x,
inco
me
leve
l (P
hysic
ians
, sp
ecia
lists
, de
ntist
s, nu
rses
, ph
arm
acist
s, m
idw
ives
, nu
triti
onist
s, ps
ychi
atris
ts,
psyc
holo
gist
s, et
c.)
• M
inist
ry o
f H
ealth
/ H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
eA
nnua
lFo
r ev
ery
10,0
00 o
f th
e po
pula
tion
durin
g the
sam
e yea
rD
etai
ls /
clas
sifica
tion
in t
erm
s of
ph
ysic
ians
, sp
ecia
lists
, de
ntist
s, nu
rses
, pha
rmac
ists,
and
mid
wiv
es
are a
vaila
ble a
t Hea
lth In
form
atio
n C
entr
e. A
s fo
r th
e cl
assifi
catio
n by
lic
ense
, se
x, l
evel
of
inco
me
and
num
ber
of
nutr
ition
ists,
psyc
hiat
rists
, and
psy
chol
ogist
s; it
is cu
rren
tly u
nava
ilabl
e.N
umbe
r of c
ampa
igns
and
prog
ram
s th
at t
arge
t ch
ildre
n, d
river
s, tr
affic
polic
e, te
ache
rs
and
pare
nts
on
traffi
c sa
fety
dur
ing
the
year
and
the
resp
onsib
le p
arty
.
• M
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
• M
inist
ry o
f H
ealth
– M
edic
al
Insti
tute
fo
r R
oad
Safe
ty
and
Dep
artm
ent
of
Hea
lth
prom
otio
n an
d Ed
ucat
ion
• M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n•
Pales
tine
Broa
dcas
ting
Cor
pora
tion
• C
ivil
Soci
ety I
nstit
utio
ns•
UN
RWA
• N
atio
nal C
omm
issio
n of
Hea
lth
Educ
atio
n
Ann
ual
Nee
d to
dev
elop
a m
echa
nism
to
colle
ct th
is in
form
atio
n
Process Indicators
29Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Process IndicatorsN
umbe
r of
aw
aren
ess
cam
paig
ns
and
prog
ram
s to
com
bat
unhe
alth
y so
cial
hab
its su
ch a
s ea
rly m
arria
ge,
cons
angu
inity
, sm
okin
g, e
tc. d
urin
g th
e ye
ar a
nd t
o be
dire
cted
at
the
resp
onsib
le p
artie
s.
• M
inist
ry of
Hea
lth –
Dep
artm
ent
of H
ealth
Edu
catio
n•
Civ
il So
ciet
y Ins
titut
ions
• Pa
lesti
ne
Broa
dcas
ting
Cor
pora
tion
• M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n•
UN
RWA
• N
atio
nal C
omm
issio
n of
Hea
lth
Educ
atio
n
Ann
ual
Dev
elop
an
info
rmat
ion
gath
erin
g m
echa
nism
Num
ber
of
med
ical
ce
ntre
s an
d ho
spita
ls an
d th
eir
distr
ibut
ion
by
area
, go
vern
orat
e, po
pula
tion
and
num
ber
of c
hild
ren,
and
qua
lified
an
d sp
ecia
lized
per
sonn
el (p
erso
nnel
av
aila
ble
for
the
faci
litie
s of
the
M
OH
onl
y) in
a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
and
as p
er t
he s
ervi
ce p
rovi
ding
pa
rty.
• M
inist
ry o
f H
ealth
– H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
eA
nnua
lD
evel
op a
n in
form
atio
n ga
ther
ing
mec
hani
sm.
A
surv
ey
of
heal
th
faci
litie
s (p
erso
nnel
, ce
ntre
s an
d nu
mbe
r of
pat
ient
s) o
n th
e nat
iona
l lev
el is
av
aila
ble.
Ano
ther
sur
vey
will
be
cond
ucte
d on
the
hea
lth f
acili
ties
durin
g 201
2.
Mor
talit
y ra
te o
f in
fant
s, ch
ildre
n un
der
five
year
s of
age
, ch
ildre
n be
twee
n 5
- les
s tha
n18
year
s of a
ge8
by c
ause
s, tim
e pe
riod,
geo
grap
hica
l di
strib
utio
n by
(go
vern
orat
e, se
x,
age g
roup
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n,
and
the
leve
l of
edu
catio
n of
the
m
othe
r).
• M
inist
ry o
f H
ealth
– H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
e•
PCBS
Ann
ual
Ever
y fou
r ye
ars
(Mor
talit
y of
in
fant
s):
Num
ber
of
dece
ased
ch
ildre
n fo
r ev
ery
1000
ne
wbo
rn in
the s
ame y
ear.
(Mor
talit
y of
child
ren
unde
r 5 y
ears
of
age)
: Num
ber o
f dec
ease
d ch
ildre
n fo
r ev
ery 1
000
new
born
in th
e sam
e yea
r.(M
orta
lity
of c
hild
ren
betw
een
5-le
ss
than
18
year
s of
age
): N
umbe
r of
de
ceas
ed ch
ildre
n fo
r eve
ry 1
000
child
fro
m t
he s
ame
age
grou
p in
the
sam
e ye
ar.
Incl
uded
in
the
Ann
ual
Hea
lth
Rep
ort
the
caus
es
by
reas
on,
age
grou
p, s
ex a
nd g
eogr
aphi
cal
loca
tion.
A
ques
tionn
aire
on
de
ceas
ed i
nfan
ts u
p to
one
yea
r of
age
is
avai
labl
e, bu
t do
esn’
t in
clud
e cl
assifi
catio
n by
the
soci
o-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
and
the l
evel
of
educ
atio
n of
the m
othe
r.
Outcome Indicators
8 Th
ere
is a
need
to d
evel
op a
nd e
xpan
d th
e qu
estio
nnai
re o
f dec
ease
d ch
ildre
n to
incl
ude
child
ren
1-le
ss th
an 1
8 ye
ars,
and
to a
dd th
e so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n of
the
fam
ily a
nd th
e le
vel o
f edu
catio
n of
the
mot
her a
nd
cond
uct a
trai
ning
on
it. I
t is p
ossib
le th
at th
is w
ill n
ot ta
ke p
lace
soon
, as i
t req
uire
s ext
ra an
d cu
rren
tly u
nava
ilabl
e res
ourc
es.
30
Perc
enta
ge o
f ch
ildre
n w
ho s
uffer
fro
m m
alnu
triti
on9 i
nclu
ding
thos
e w
ho
suffe
r ch
roni
c m
alnu
triti
on
(Ane
mia
, w
astin
g,
low
w
eigh
t, st
untin
g,
vita
min
A
de
ficie
ncy,
iodi
ne
defic
ienc
y, ov
erw
eigh
t, ob
esity
or
acut
e by
age
, ar
ea,
sex,
so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n an
d th
e le
vel o
f edu
catio
n of
the m
othe
r, an
d tim
e per
iod.
Perc
enta
ge o
f tho
se ea
ting u
nhea
lthy,
fast
food
s, an
d do
not
eat
bre
akfa
st
(at s
choo
l/ho
me)
.
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
thro
ugh
Nut
ritio
n Su
rvei
llanc
e an
d ad
min
istra
tive r
ecor
dsPC
BSU
NRW
A -
Rec
ords
1-3
year
s or
ever
y fou
r ye
ars
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n su
fferin
g fro
m th
e pr
oblem
with
a ce
rtai
n ag
e gro
up /
the
tota
l num
ber
of c
hild
ren
with
in t
hat
age g
roup
) x 1
00W
astin
g:
-2
Stan
dard
D
evia
tion
> w
eigh
t/he
ight
Low
Wei
ght:
Low
wei
ght v
s. ag
e
-2
Stan
dard
Dev
iatio
n >
wei
ght/
age
Ove
rwei
ght:
+3 S
tand
ard
Dev
iatio
n ≥
wei
ght/
age >
St
anda
rd D
evia
tion
Obe
sity:
+3
Stan
dard
Dev
iatio
n >
wei
ght/
age
Stun
ting:
shor
tnes
s vs.
age
and
refle
cts
the
heal
th
or
nutr
ition
al
situa
tion
-2 St
anda
rd D
evia
tion
> w
eigh
t/he
ight
Ane
mia
: Le
ss
than
11
gm/d
ecili
ter
Seve
re:
less
th
an
7gm
/dec
ilite
r Av
erag
e: 7
-10g
m/d
ecili
ter
Expa
nd th
e N
utrit
ion
Surv
eilla
nce
prog
ram
an
d sc
hool
he
alth
to
in
clud
e ch
ildre
n fro
m 3
-5 y
ears
of
age.
Num
ber/
perc
enta
ge
of
child
ren
(0-1
8 ye
ars)
tha
t w
ere
diag
nose
d w
ith
inco
mm
unic
able
ch
roni
c di
seas
e by
age
, ge
ogra
phic
al a
rea
(Gov
erno
rate
), se
x, an
d tim
e per
iod.
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
PCBS
Ann
ual
4 ye
ars
Can
cer,
diab
etes
an
d ev
ery
inco
mm
unic
able
ch
roni
c di
seas
e be
ing d
iagn
osed
in th
e fut
ure
Mor
talit
y ra
te o
f m
othe
rs b
y ag
e, ed
ucat
ion
leve
l, ca
uses
, dist
ribut
ion,
so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n du
ring
a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
(one
year
)
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
Ann
ual
For e
very
100
,000
of l
ive b
irths
dur
ing
the s
ame y
ear
Outcome Indicators
9 Th
ere a
re d
iffer
ent r
easo
ns fo
r all
the d
isord
ers,
start
ing f
rom
lack
of p
reci
se an
d sp
ecifi
c nut
ritio
nal e
lemen
ts su
ch as
vita
min
s, m
iner
als o
r pro
tein
. Any
dec
reas
e or i
ncre
ase i
n th
e cal
orie
s mig
ht ca
use h
unge
r or o
besit
y or
othe
r pro
blem
s.
31Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Perc
enta
ge
of
full
natu
ral
brea
st
feed
ing
with
in t
he fi
rst
hour
of
birt
h, in
the fi
rst s
ix m
onth
s; by
area
(g
over
nora
te),
sex,
wor
k of
mot
her,
soci
o-ec
onom
ic
situa
tion,
ag
e of
m
othe
r, ed
ucat
ion
of m
othe
r dur
ing
a tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
thro
ugh
Nut
ritio
n Su
rvei
llanc
e an
d he
alth
sit
uatio
n of
mot
her a
nd ch
ildSu
rvey
s - P
CBS
Ann
ual
3-4
year
s
Chi
ldre
n fro
m 0
to
the
end
of t
he
fifth
mon
th o
f th
eir
age
who
stil
l are
br
eastf
ed b
y th
eir
mot
her
and
who
di
dn’t
eat
any
artifi
cial
milk
, foo
d or
dr
ink.
V
itam
ins
and
med
icin
e ar
e ex
clud
ed.
Wor
k of
mot
her,
soci
o-ec
onom
ic
situa
tion,
age o
f mot
her,
educ
atio
n of
mot
her
durin
g a
time
perio
d (u
nava
ilabl
e at t
he m
omen
t)Fu
ll br
eastf
eedi
ng:
brea
stfed
by
th
eir
mot
her
and
didn
’t co
nsum
e an
y ar
tifici
al m
ilk, f
ood
or d
rink.
V
itam
ins
and
med
icin
e ar
e ex
clud
ed.
Perc
enta
ge o
f wom
en e
ight
een
year
s or
les
s or
> 3
5 ye
ars
upon
giv
ing
birt
h in
a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– A
dmin
istra
tive
reco
rds
PCBS
1-3
Year
sFo
r 100
0 ch
ildre
nD
evel
op li
ve b
irth
repo
rt fo
rm an
d ad
ding
the k
insh
ip ty
pe an
d de
gree
Perc
enta
ge o
f di
sabi
lity
case
s du
e to
tra
ffic
acci
dent
s du
ring
a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPC
BS
Ann
ual
(Num
ber
of d
isabi
lity
case
s du
e to
tr
affic
acci
dent
s /
tota
l nu
mbe
r of
di
sabi
lity c
ases
) x 1
00
Num
ber
of
repo
rted
co
mpl
aint
s re
gard
ing
child
ren
not
rece
ivin
g ne
eded
he
alth
se
rvic
es
and
negl
igen
ce
by
heal
th
serv
ice
prov
ider
s du
ring
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
ICH
RM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Com
plai
nts b
oxA
nnua
lSh
ows
the
incr
ease
in t
he le
vel o
f pe
ople
’s aw
aren
ess o
f the
ir rig
hts
Num
ber
of
com
plai
nts
rega
rdin
g de
nial
of c
hild
ren’s
rig
hts
that
wer
e pr
oces
sed
durin
g a
cert
ain
time
perio
d
ICH
RM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Com
plai
nts b
oxA
nnua
lSh
ows
how
co
mm
itted
is
the
Min
istry
in fo
llow
ing
up r
ight
s of
patie
nts
Outcome Indicators
32
Rig
ht in
Edu
catio
n (A
rtic
les 2
8 an
d 29
)
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of
spec
ific
laws,
exec
utiv
e re
gula
tions
, and
aut
horit
ies b
ased
on
the
right
s of
the
chi
ld t
o str
engt
hen
a sa
fe e
duca
tiona
l en
viro
nmen
t, im
prov
e th
e qu
ality
of
educ
atio
n, an
d pr
even
t vio
lence
espe
cial
ly in
rem
ote a
nd m
argi
naliz
ed ar
eas t
hat e
nsur
e tr
ansp
aren
cy, a
ccou
ntab
ility
, the
chi
ld’s
best
inte
rest
, equ
ality
, non
-disc
rimin
atio
n, a
nd
with
the c
hild
’s pa
rtic
ipat
ion.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PLC
Avai
labi
lity
of la
ws,
plan
s, pr
ogra
ms a
nd b
udge
t mec
hani
sms b
ased
on
the r
ight
s of t
he
child
to st
reng
then
a sa
fe ed
ucat
iona
l env
ironm
ent,
impr
ove t
he qu
ality
of ed
ucat
ion,
and
prev
ent v
iolen
ce e
spec
ially
in re
mot
e an
d m
argi
naliz
ed a
reas
that
ens
ure
tran
spar
ency
, ac
coun
tabi
lity,
the c
hild
’s bes
t int
eres
t, eq
ualit
y, no
n-di
scrim
inat
ion,
and
with
the c
hild
’s pa
rtic
ipat
ion.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Avai
labl
e m
easu
res
to e
ncou
rage
the
regu
lar
atte
ndan
ce a
nd p
reve
nt s
choo
l dro
pout
, an
d th
e pro
visio
n of
man
dato
ry, f
ree e
duca
tion
( inc
ludi
ng p
reve
ntin
g sch
ool a
cces
s).
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Avai
labi
lity o
f mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n m
echa
nism
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Priv
ate s
ecto
rAv
aila
bilit
y of c
ompl
aint
s and
mon
itorin
g mec
hani
smM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nU
NRW
AIC
HR
Avai
labi
lity
of m
echa
nism
s to
mob
ilize
sup
port
and
sol
idar
ity, a
nd r
aisin
g le
vels
of
awar
enes
s on
the r
ight
of e
duca
tion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate s
ecto
rAv
aila
bilit
y of p
rogr
ams t
hat t
arge
t tal
ente
d an
d gi
fted
child
ren
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Priv
ate s
ecto
rC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
ns
Structural Indicators
33Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
The
scop
e an
d qu
ality
of t
he im
plem
enta
tion
of p
lans
and
pro
gram
s to
impr
ove
the
qual
ity o
f edu
catio
n in
the a
reas
espe
cial
ly th
e rem
ote,
poor
and
mar
gina
lized
.Th
e sc
ope
and
qual
ity o
f th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of p
olic
ies,
legi
slatio
n an
d law
s to
str
engt
hen
a saf
e, ed
ucat
iona
l env
ironm
ent a
nd p
reve
nt vi
olen
ce.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Priv
ate s
ecto
r
Avai
labl
e or u
nava
ilabl
eSc
ope o
f im
plem
enta
tion
Effec
tiven
ess a
nd q
ualit
y of
impl
emen
tatio
nPe
rcen
tage
of
spen
ding
on
the
educ
atio
nal
sect
or o
ut o
f th
e ge
nera
l bu
dget
and
pe
rcen
tage
of s
pend
ing
on th
e chi
ld, m
argi
naliz
ed g
roup
s, an
d un
iver
sity e
duca
tion
per
year
.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of F
inan
ceU
NRW
A
Ann
ual
Deg
ree o
f act
ive i
nvol
vem
ent o
f tea
cher
s in
the e
duca
tion
(tea
chin
g/le
arni
ng) p
roce
ss.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
The
exte
nt o
f cur
ricul
um a
nd it
s con
tent
mee
ting
the
educ
atio
nal n
eeds
of P
ales
tinia
n so
ciet
y and
the r
ight
s of t
he ch
ild.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Num
ber o
f qua
lified
teac
hers
and
thei
r dist
ribut
ion
by st
age,
sex
and
area
acc
ordi
ng to
th
e str
ateg
y of t
each
ers’
reha
bilit
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Ed
ucat
ion
(priv
ate
scho
ols a
nd U
NRW
A)
3 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f qua
lified
and
spec
ializ
ed st
aff, a
nd th
eir d
istrib
utio
n by
spec
ialty
and
area
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
(Priv
ate s
choo
lsU
NRW
A
3 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f hea
lth an
d co
unse
ling p
rogr
ams i
n sc
hool
sM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n U
NRW
APr
ivat
e sec
tor
Num
ber
of s
tudi
es o
n th
e w
eakn
ess
of e
duca
tiona
l lev
el, t
he r
easo
ns b
ehin
d it,
and
m
onito
ring i
tM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nU
NRW
A2-
4 ye
ars
Rat
io o
f cla
ss d
ensit
y or c
onge
stion
stud
ent/
clas
s, th
e rea
sons
beh
ind
it, an
d m
onito
ring
itM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nU
NRW
AA
nnua
l
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ools
that
hav
e in
fras
truc
ture
for s
tude
nts w
ith d
isabi
litie
s, pe
rcen
tage
of
scho
ols t
hat h
ave r
esou
rce r
oom
sM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n U
NRW
APr
ivat
e sec
tor
Process Indicators
34
Perc
enta
ge o
f stu
dent
/san
itary
uni
t (to
ilet)
by a
rea,
type
of s
choo
l, an
d st
age
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of H
ealth
3
year
s
Num
ber o
f sch
ools
conn
ecte
d to
offi
cial
sew
age
netw
ork
and
the
avai
labi
lity
of p
ublic
w
ater
net
wor
kM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthW
ater
Aut
horit
yPC
BS
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f tea
cher
s qua
lified
to ed
ucat
e esp
ecia
lly o
n th
e rig
hts o
f the
child
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Priv
ate s
ecto
r
Ann
ual
Rat
io st
uden
t/co
unse
lor b
y are
a, ty
pe o
f sch
ool,
and
stage
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ools
that
hav
e can
teen
s by d
irect
orat
e and
area
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Ann
ually
Perc
enta
ge o
f net
and
gros
s enr
ollm
ent b
y sta
ge, s
ex an
d ar
ea (W
est B
ank
and
Gaz
a)M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPC
BSU
NRW
A
Ann
ually
Diff
er
depe
ndin
g on
tim
e of
m
easu
rem
ent
Perc
enta
ge o
f disa
bled
child
ren
out o
f tot
al n
umbe
r of s
tude
nt b
y typ
e of d
isabi
lity,
sex,
ag
e and
geo
grap
hica
l dist
ribut
ion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
, Priv
ate S
choo
lsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Spec
ial c
entr
es
Ann
ually
Perc
enta
ge o
f poo
r chi
ldre
n ou
t of t
otal
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s by s
ex, a
ge an
d ge
ogra
phic
al
distr
ibut
ion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
, Priv
ate S
choo
lsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Spec
ial c
entr
es
Ann
ually
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ool d
ropo
ut d
etai
led
by ca
uses
, age
, sex
, are
a, sta
ge an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
sit
uatio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPC
BSU
NRW
A
Ann
ually
Rat
e of e
nrol
lmen
t in
kind
erga
rten
by a
rea,
sex a
nd so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nA
nnua
lly
Process Indicators Outcome Indicators
35Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed o
f acc
ess t
o el
ectr
icity
due
to Is
rael
i mea
sure
s by a
rea
UN
Org
aniz
atio
nsIn
tern
atio
nal
com
mun
ity
insti
tutio
ns
Ann
ually
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n re
ceiv
ing s
uppo
rted
scho
ol m
eals
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Ann
ually
Rat
io o
f stu
dent
to te
ache
r by a
rea
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
Ann
ually
Perc
enta
ge o
f rea
ding
and
writ
ing p
rofic
ienc
y by s
tage
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
Ann
ually
– 3
year
s
Num
ber o
f stu
dent
s/co
mpu
ter l
ab/s
cien
ce la
b/lib
rarie
s by s
choo
l typ
e, ar
ea an
d se
xM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPC
BSU
NRW
A
3 ye
ars
Man
dato
ry n
atio
nal s
tand
ard
test
in A
rabi
c La
ngua
ge a
nd M
ath
for t
he 4
th a
nd 1
0th
grad
es an
d th
e int
erna
tiona
l tes
ts T
IMSS
.M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ools
fulfi
lling
child
frie
ndly
stan
dard
s by a
rea
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n ha
ving
lear
ning
diffi
culti
es an
d en
rolle
d in
the e
duca
tiona
l sys
tem
by
sex,
age a
nd d
istrib
utio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nU
NRW
A, P
rivat
e Sch
ools
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthSp
ecia
l cen
tres
4 ye
ars
Una
vaila
ble
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith c
hron
ic d
iseas
es a
nd en
rolle
d in
the
educ
atio
nal s
yste
m b
y se
x, ag
e and
dist
ribut
ion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
, Priv
ate S
choo
lsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Spec
ial c
entr
esN
atio
nal
Cen
tre
for
Chr
onic
D
iseas
es
Outcome Indicators
36
Num
ber o
f sch
ools
subj
ect t
o at
tack
s on
infr
astr
uctu
reM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
Num
ber o
f stu
dent
s sub
ject
to at
tack
s fro
m th
e arm
y or s
ettle
rs (t
raffi
c acc
iden
ts, a
rres
ts,
firea
rm in
jurie
s, et
c.)M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nM
inist
ry o
f Det
aine
esIn
stitu
tion
for
Car
ing
for
Fam
ilies
of
th
e M
arty
rs
and
Wou
nded
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsN
umbe
r of h
ours
was
ted
in d
elay
s on
rout
e to
scho
ol (E
duca
tiona
l was
te) b
y st
uden
ts
and
teac
hers
due
to vi
olat
ions
M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f stu
dent
s suff
erin
g fro
m p
sych
olog
ical
and
beh
avio
ral p
robl
ems c
omm
on in
th
e mar
gina
lized
area
.M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Ann
ual
Outcome Indicators
37Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Prot
ectio
n In
dica
tors
(Art
icle
s 3, 5
, 10,
19,
20,
37,
and
38)
Stru
ctur
al Q
ualit
ativ
e Ind
icat
ors (
Avai
labi
lity,
qua
lity,
scop
e of i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d sa
tisfa
ctio
n)
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of
spe
cific
, act
ive,
impl
emen
ted
and
natio
nally
app
rove
d le
gal a
nd
legi
slativ
e fra
mew
ork,
exec
utiv
e reg
ulat
ions
and
auth
oriti
es fo
r the
pro
tect
ion
of
the c
hild
.
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPL
C
Avai
labi
lity
of w
ritte
n, a
ppro
ved
and
bind
ing
long
ter
m p
olic
ies
and
plan
s fo
r th
e pr
otec
tion
of t
he c
hild
(D
etai
led
hum
an a
nd fi
nanc
ial
reso
urce
s ne
eded
, pr
ogra
ms)
Min
istry
of
Soci
al A
ffairs
and
pa
rtne
r m
inist
ries
such
as
M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth, M
inist
ry o
f Ed
ucat
ion,
Hig
her
Cou
ncil
of
Yout
h an
d Sp
orts
, Pol
ice,
Hig
her
Judi
cial
C
ounc
il,
Min
istry
of
In
terio
r, M
inist
ry
of
Fina
nce,
PCBS
, Civ
il So
ciet
y Ins
titut
ions
, U
NRW
A, M
inist
ry o
f Lab
our
Avai
labi
lity o
f chi
ldho
od p
rote
ctio
ns n
etw
ork
Avai
labi
lity
of sp
ecia
lized
dep
artm
ents
in ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n in
the m
inist
ries s
uch
as M
inist
ry o
f So
cial
Affa
irs, M
inist
ry o
f La
bour
, Pol
ice,
cour
ts, M
inist
ry o
f Ed
ucat
ion,
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Avai
labi
lity o
f eth
ical
and
coun
selin
g crit
eria
to p
rote
ct th
e chi
ld fr
om al
l for
ms o
f vi
olen
ce an
d in
all l
ocat
ions
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s to
prot
ect t
he ch
ild ag
ains
t phy
sical
and
psyc
holo
gica
l vi
olen
ce; a
buse
, nee
d, b
eggi
ng, e
vasio
n, n
eglig
ence
, tor
ture
, exp
loita
tion,
etc.
Avai
labi
lity
of n
atio
nal a
nd u
nifie
d de
finiti
ons
of v
iolen
ce, a
buse
, phy
sical
and
ps
ycho
logi
cal a
buse
, neg
ligen
ce, p
hysic
al p
unish
men
t, et
c.Av
aila
bilit
y pro
cedu
res t
o su
ppor
t par
ents
and
lega
l gua
rdia
ns to
raise
the c
hild
Avai
labi
lity o
f sys
tem
atic
mon
itorin
g and
acco
unta
bilit
y mec
hani
sms f
or al
l chi
ld
care
and
prot
ectio
n in
stitu
tions
.Av
aila
bilit
y of
mec
hani
sms t
o m
obili
ze su
ppor
t and
solid
arity
and
raise
leve
l of
awar
enes
s on
child
’s rig
ht in
pro
tect
ion
and
the
loca
tions
of p
rovi
ding
serv
ices
, et
c.
38
Prot
ectio
n Q
ualit
ativ
e In
dica
tors
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Type
Freq
uenc
yD
efini
tion
Num
ber
of
wor
kers
w
ith
child
ren
(Ser
vice
, ca
re,
and
prot
ectio
n) an
d th
ose w
ho ar
e cer
tified
Min
istrie
s of
co
ncer
n,
civi
l so
ciet
y in
stitu
tions
, priv
ate s
ecto
r, U
NRW
APr
oces
s
Num
ber
of a
ppro
ved
prog
ram
s th
at t
arge
t ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n w
orke
rs b
y en
tity,
type
of t
rain
ing,
num
ber
of p
artic
ipan
ts,
distr
ibut
ion
(uni
fied
and
syst
emat
ic o
n th
e nat
iona
l lev
el)
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
, C
hild
hood
Pr
otec
tion
Net
wor
k,
Civ
il So
ciet
y In
stitu
tions
, UN
RWA
Proc
ess
Iden
tify
all c
hild
pro
tect
ion
and
serv
ice
syst
em w
orke
rs,
spec
ific t
rain
ing c
riter
iaPe
rcen
tage
of t
he a
ctua
l spe
ndin
g on
chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n ou
t of
the t
otal
spen
ding
Proc
ess
Num
ber o
f cas
es o
f com
mun
ity v
iolen
ce a
gain
st c
hild
ren
by
type
, age
, sex
, are
a, sit
uatio
n of
the
child
, lev
el o
f edu
catio
n of
par
ents
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n of
the f
amily
, and
hea
lth
situa
tion
of th
e chi
ld (i
llnes
s, di
sabi
lity)
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
ds,
Polic
e, U
NRW
A,
civi
l so
ciet
y in
stitu
tions
, sur
veys
, adm
inist
rativ
e rec
ords
Out
com
eA
nnua
l and
surv
ey ev
ery fi
ve
year
s
Perc
enta
ge o
f wor
king
and
expl
oite
d ch
ildre
n de
taile
d by
sex,
ag
e, ar
ea an
d ca
use,
leve
l of e
duca
tion
of p
aren
ts, e
nrol
lmen
t in
sch
ool,
educ
atio
nal s
tage
of
the
child
; typ
e, na
ture
and
ho
urs o
f wor
k, lo
catio
n of
wor
k, a
vera
ge p
ay, w
ith fa
mily
or
outs
ide,
and
the h
ealth
situ
atio
n of
the c
hild
Min
istry
of
Labo
ur, P
olic
e, fa
mily
sur
vey,
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs, U
NRW
A, P
CBS
Out
com
e1-
3 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f juv
enile
insti
tutio
ns, r
ehab
ilita
tion
cent
res,
arre
st
cent
res,
wai
ting r
oom
s at c
hild
ren’s
cour
tsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
Hig
her J
udic
ial C
ounc
il
Proc
ess
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of
tem
pora
ry
child
pr
otec
tion
inst
itutio
ns
by
geog
raph
ical
dist
ribut
ion
and
targ
et g
roup
s (t
ype
of a
buse
, se
x, ag
e, tim
e spe
nt b
y chi
ld)
Num
ber
of t
he in
stitu
tions
tha
t pr
ovid
e le
gal a
ssist
ance
to
deta
ined
juve
nile
s and
child
ren
Proc
ess
Num
ber
of in
mat
es in
the
juve
nile
insti
tutio
ns b
y se
x, a
ge,
area
, ca
use,
char
ge,
scho
ol e
nrol
lmen
t, fa
mily
(nu
mbe
r of
m
embe
rs,
disjo
inte
d or
not
, soc
ial a
nd h
ealth
situ
atio
n, h
ead
of th
e fam
ily)
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsO
utco
me
39Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Aver
age t
ime o
f det
entio
n an
d ar
rest
at ce
ntre
sH
ighe
r Ju
dici
al C
ounc
il, P
olic
e, M
inist
ry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs, A
ttor
ney G
ener
al’s
Offi
ce,
ICH
R
Out
com
eA
nnua
lN
umbe
r of c
hild
ren
det
aine
d be
fore
tria
lO
utco
me
Num
ber
and
perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n de
tain
ed a
t ins
titut
ions
no
t spe
cifie
d fo
r chi
ldre
nO
utco
me
Num
ber
of i
nstit
utio
ns t
hat
prov
ide
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d re
-in
tegr
atio
n se
rvic
es t
o ch
ildre
n th
at h
ave
been
vic
tims
of
viol
ence
and
abu
se, j
uven
iles,
and
wor
kers
by
distr
ibut
ion,
ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
and
type
of s
ervi
ce
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsPr
oces
s3-
5 ye
ars
Num
ber
of c
hild
ben
efici
arie
s fro
m r
ehab
ilita
tion
and
re-
inte
grat
ion
prog
ram
s (ju
veni
les,
wor
kers
, vic
tims o
f vio
lence
an
d ex
ploi
tatio
n) b
y age
, are
a, se
x ,ca
use,
etc.
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsO
utco
me
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of r
epor
ted
case
s of
offe
nce,
mal
trea
tmen
t an
d ex
ploi
tatio
n at
hom
e, sc
hool
, soc
iety
, det
entio
n an
d ar
rest
ce
ntre
s and
care
cent
res a
nd th
e met
hod
of re
port
ing
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
th
roug
h ch
ildho
od p
rote
ctio
n ne
twor
k, M
inist
ry o
f Ed
ucat
ion,
Min
istry
of H
ealth
, Pol
ice,
civi
l so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
, IC
HR
Out
com
eA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f wor
kers
with
chi
ldre
n in
the
field
s of p
rote
ctio
n su
ch
as
judg
es,
pros
ecut
ion,
se
curit
y, ju
veni
le
justi
ce,
psyc
holo
gist
s an
d so
cial
ists,
pro
batio
n offi
cers
, he
alth
, ed
ucat
ion,
child
labo
ur in
spec
tors
, chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n co
unse
lor,
soci
al c
ouns
elor
, in
stitu
tion
audi
tors
, w
omen
cou
nsel
ors,
polic
e, an
d M
inist
ry o
f Lab
our i
nspe
ctor
s
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
-
child
hood
pr
otec
tion
netw
ork,
Polic
e, ch
ildre
n,
Min
istry
of H
ealth
, Min
istry
of E
duca
tion,
H
ighe
r Ju
dici
al
Cou
ncil,
A
ttor
ney
Gen
eral
’s offi
ce, e
tc.
Proc
ess
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f car
e in
stitu
tions
that
pro
vide
serv
ices
to o
rpha
ns
by a
rea,
distr
ibut
ion,
typ
e, ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
, lic
ense
and
re
gistr
atio
n (in
clud
es d
efini
tion
of o
rpha
n)
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsZa
kat C
omm
ittee
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
UN
RWA
Proc
ess
3-5
year
s
Num
ber o
f per
iodi
cal h
ealth
revi
ews t
he ch
ild is
subj
ect t
o in
ca
re h
omes
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsPr
oces
sA
nnua
lC
lear
byl
aws
and
tran
sfer
mec
hani
sms
Num
ber
of p
erio
dica
l jud
icia
l rev
iew
s th
e ca
re in
stitu
tions
co
nduc
tM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Bure
au o
f Chi
ef Ju
dge
Att
orne
y Gen
eral
’s O
ffice
Pro
cess
Ann
ual
40
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed fr
om p
aren
ts’ c
are
or w
ho li
ve
with
one
of t
he p
aren
ts, b
y ca
uses
, are
a, ag
e, se
x, a
nd so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
rM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthW
aqf
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Hig
h Ju
dici
al C
ounc
ilSu
rvey
s/PC
BS (F
amily
Sur
vey)
Rel
igio
us C
ourt
s
Out
com
eA
nnua
lD
efini
tions
sh
ould
be
sp
ecifi
ed (
care
, par
ents
) an
d ap
prov
ed
natio
nally
.
For
exam
ple,
pare
nts
mig
ht b
e al
ive
but
the
child
doe
sn’t
live
with
th
em
by
cour
t or
der,
or an
y rea
son
Num
ber o
f spo
nsor
ed c
hild
ren,
or u
nder
spon
sors
hip
insid
e an
d ou
tsid
e the
coun
try
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren
born
out
of
wed
lock
by
area
, sex
, and
he
alth
situ
atio
n
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
rBu
reau
of C
hief
Judg
e
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r
Out
com
eA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f fam
ilies
spon
sorin
g chi
ldre
nM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Num
ber
of t
reat
men
t an
d re
habi
litat
ion
cent
res,
or t
he
cent
res
that
pro
vide
ser
vice
s to
dru
g ab
user
s an
d ta
rget
ch
ildre
n aff
ecte
d by
dru
g abu
se b
y typ
e of i
nstit
utio
n, se
rvic
e, di
strib
utio
n, a
bsor
ptio
n ca
paci
ty a
nd n
umbe
r of
chi
ldre
n en
rolle
d du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r
Proc
ess
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e de
tain
ed i
n dr
ug a
nd s
ubsta
nce
abus
e re
late
d ca
ses a
nd h
ave c
hild
ren
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
rPo
lice
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Out
com
e A
nnua
l
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren
det
aine
d in
dru
g an
d su
bsta
nce
abus
e re
late
d ca
ses
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren
who
rec
eive
d re
habi
litat
ion
and
heal
th
serv
ices
who
wer
e affe
cted
by d
rug a
buse
Num
ber o
f stu
dies
that
addr
esse
d th
e effe
ct o
f arm
ed co
nflic
t/oc
cupa
tion
on th
e chi
ldre
n Pr
oces
s
41Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Num
ber o
f chi
ld vi
ctim
s of m
ines
, UX
O, a
nd ar
med
confl
ict/
occu
patio
n by
area
, age
, sex
and
caus
e Po
lice
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsD
efen
se fo
r Chi
ldre
n Pa
lesti
neU
NIC
EFM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthO
CH
A
Out
com
eA
nnua
l
Num
ber
of s
tudi
es t
hat
addr
esse
d th
e eff
ect
of p
over
ty o
n ch
ildre
nPr
oces
sA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n in
poo
r fam
ilies
by ar
ea, s
ex, a
ge, s
ituat
ion
of th
e hea
d of
the f
amily
, the
hea
lth an
d ed
ucat
iona
l situ
atio
n of
fath
er, m
othe
r, an
d ch
ildre
n, et
c.
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs –
Rec
ords
UN
RWA
– R
ecor
dsSu
rvey
s - P
CBS
Out
com
e1-
3 ye
ars a
ccor
ding
to
th
e na
tiona
l pl
ans
Com
paris
on o
f re
cord
s by
su
rvey
s
Num
ber
of
child
re
fuge
es
(det
aile
d by
ge
ogra
phic
al
distr
ibut
ion,
age
, sex
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n, e
duca
tion,
et
c.)
PCBS
UN
RWA
Ref
ugee
s Affa
irs O
ffice
Out
com
e3-
5 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho w
ere s
ubje
ct to
atta
cks a
s a re
sult
of
the o
ccup
atio
n by
age,
sex,
area
, hea
lth si
tuat
ion
of th
e chi
ldD
efen
se fo
r Chi
ldre
n Pa
lesti
neU
NIC
EFO
CH
AM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of D
etai
nees
Insti
tutio
n fo
r C
arin
g fo
r Fa
mili
es o
f th
e M
arty
rs an
d W
ound
ed
42
Part
icip
atio
n In
dica
tors
(Art
icle
s 12,
13,
15,
16,
17,
30)
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of
sp
ecifi
c le
gal
and
regu
lato
ry
fram
ewor
k, ex
ecut
ive r
egul
atio
ns, a
nd au
thor
ities
of
child
’s ri
ghts
in p
artic
ipat
ion
Fam
ily, j
udic
ial
syst
em, M
inist
ry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs,
Min
istry
of L
ocal
G
over
nmen
t, M
edia
, PLC
, M
inist
ry o
f Cul
ture
, Ed
ucat
ion,
Hea
lth,
civi
l soc
iety
Defi
nitio
n: t
his
indi
cato
r sh
ows
the
avai
labi
lity
of la
ws,
rule
s, an
d/or
re
gula
tions
that
stat
e on
part
icip
atio
n an
d ex
pres
sion
of o
pini
on o
r sho
w
the
right
in re
ceiv
ing
info
rmat
ion
and
givi
ng o
pini
ons.
They
also
show
m
eans
of a
ccou
ntab
ility
.
Incl
ude:
Nat
iona
l mea
sure
s and
pro
cedu
res t
hat g
rant
the c
hild
the r
ight
to
be h
eard
out
and
to p
artic
ipat
e in
the i
ssue
s rel
ated
to th
emTh
e le
gisla
tion
and
polic
ies
need
ed t
o en
sure
a w
ider
par
ticip
atio
n of
yo
uth
in th
e rep
rese
ntat
ion,
pol
itica
l, le
gisla
tive a
nd lo
cal b
odie
sEn
sure
the
suffi
cien
t int
egra
tion
of C
RC a
rtic
le 1
2 in
all t
he re
leva
nt n
atio
nal l
aws o
f rel
atio
n, as
wel
l as
adm
inist
rativ
e pro
cedu
res
Avai
labi
lity
of s
trat
egie
s an
d pl
ans
thro
ugh
whi
ch
the p
artic
ipat
ion
of ch
ild is
spec
ified
Judi
cial
syst
em,
min
istrie
s of
rela
tion
and
civi
l so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
, PL
C
Defi
nitio
n: sh
ows t
he ex
isten
ce o
f str
ateg
ies t
hat a
im at
impl
emen
ting t
he
part
icip
atio
n of
the
child
thro
ugh
thei
r pr
ogra
ms t
hrou
gh w
hich
chi
ld
is be
ing
info
rmed
, giv
en th
e rig
ht to
expr
essio
n of
opi
nion
, infl
uenc
e on
deci
sions
, and
wei
ght t
o th
eir o
pini
on
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s th
at e
nsur
e ha
ving
bot
h ge
nder
s an
d th
e di
sabl
ed ri
ghts
to p
artic
ipat
e and
that
thei
r opi
nion
are r
espe
cted
Avai
labi
lity
of t
he n
eede
d fin
anci
al a
nd h
uman
re
sour
ces
to s
tren
gthe
n th
e rig
ht o
f th
e ch
ild i
n pa
rtic
ipat
ion
Defi
nitio
n: in
dica
tor s
how
s tha
t the
fina
ncia
l res
ourc
es th
e sta
te re
ceiv
ed
to b
udge
t an
d sp
end
on t
he p
artic
ipat
ion
of c
hild
ren
and
yout
h in
all
field
s, an
d th
e exp
erie
nced
and
qual
ified
hum
an re
sour
ces t
o ac
tivat
e the
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
of ch
ildre
n an
d yo
uth
Way
of C
alcu
latio
n: A
mou
nt o
f res
ourc
es al
loca
ted
and
the a
mou
nt sp
ent
on ch
ildre
n an
d yo
uth
Structural Indicators
43Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Avai
labi
lity o
f aw
aren
ess c
ampa
igns
and
educ
atio
nal p
rogr
ams t
hat a
im at
chan
ging
the
prev
ailin
g cul
ture
and
disc
ussin
g the
role
of b
oth
gend
ers a
nd th
e fac
tors
lead
ing t
o m
alpr
actic
e ag
ains
t mar
gina
lized
gro
ups,
and
othe
r har
mfu
l as
pect
s (su
ch as
early
mar
riage
)
Avai
labi
lity o
f stu
dies
and
repo
rts t
hat m
easu
re h
ow
effec
tive t
he m
edia
cam
paig
ns ar
e
Avai
labi
lity
of ch
ildre
n’s p
arlia
men
t on
the n
atio
nal
and
loca
l lev
elTa
king
the
child
’s op
inio
n on
the
cour
t pro
cedu
res
agai
nst h
im su
ch a
s pla
ce o
f res
iden
ce, t
estim
ony
in
cour
t, et
c.Av
aila
bilit
y of
tech
nolo
gica
l ser
vice
s in
the
rem
ote
and
mar
gina
lized
area
s
The i
nclu
sion
of ci
tizen
ship
and
belo
ngin
g con
cept
s in
the m
edia
and
natio
nal s
ervi
ces
Perc
enta
ge
of
actu
al
finan
cing
fo
r ch
ildre
n go
vern
men
tally
an
d in
tern
atio
nally
to
su
ppor
t sp
orts
, re
crea
tiona
l, cu
ltura
l an
d ar
tistic
act
iviti
es
amon
g chi
ldre
n an
d yo
uth
out o
f the
gene
ral b
udge
t
Min
istry
of
Plan
ning
/Fin
ance
Ann
ually
Num
ber o
f spo
rt an
d re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s and
yout
h ce
ntre
s es
peci
ally
equ
ippe
d fo
r fe
mal
es a
nd p
eopl
e w
ith
disa
bilit
ies
by
geog
raph
ical
di
strib
utio
n/di
sabi
lity t
ype/
activ
ity ty
pe/a
ge/s
ex.
PCBS
4 ye
ars
Num
ber
of o
rgan
izat
ions
wor
king
with
chi
ldho
od
and
yout
h/by
area
/sex
/age
/ ser
vice
typ
e (w
ork)
Inte
rior
and
loca
l go
vern
men
tA
nnua
lly
Perc
enta
ge
of
coun
cils,
m
unic
ipal
ities
an
d co
mm
unity
co
mm
ittee
s th
at
have
ch
ild
repr
esen
tatio
n
Hig
her
Cou
ncil
of
Yout
h an
d Sp
orts
Min
istry
of
Lo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent
Civ
il so
ciet
y in
stitu
tions
4 ye
ars
(dep
endi
ng
on t
he t
ime
perio
d ap
prov
ed
for
the
elec
tion
cycl
e)
Defi
nitio
n:
an in
dica
tor
to m
easu
re t
he
perc
enta
ge o
f co
unci
ls an
d m
unic
ipal
ities
tha
t im
plem
ent
the
polic
y of
chi
ld r
epre
sent
atio
n an
d str
engt
hen
thei
r act
ive p
artic
ipat
ion,
out
of t
he to
tal n
umbe
rW
ay o
f Cal
cula
tion:
Num
ber
of co
unci
ls o
ut o
f the
tota
l num
ber
Process Indicators
44
Num
ber o
f st
uden
t co
unci
ls co
mpa
red
to n
umbe
r of
scho
ols/
gove
rnm
enta
l/pr
ivat
eN
ote:
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
does
not
reco
gniz
e thi
s na
min
g
Hig
her C
ounc
il of
Yo
uth
and
Spor
tsM
inist
ry o
f Ed
ucat
ion
Ann
ually
Defi
nitio
n: a
n in
dica
tor t
o m
easu
re th
e im
plem
enta
tion
the
polic
y of
ch
ild re
pres
enta
tion
in th
e edu
catio
nal s
yste
m an
d po
licie
sW
ay o
f Cal
cula
tion:
Num
ber
of sc
hool
s tha
t hav
e st
uden
t co
unci
ls ou
t of
the t
otal
num
ber
A
ge G
roup
: 12-
less
than
18
year
s
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren’s
lib
rarie
s/ar
ea/g
over
nora
te/
resp
onsib
le p
arty
Hig
her C
ounc
il of
Yo
uth
and
Spor
tsM
inist
ry o
f Cul
ture
Ann
ually
Num
ber
of
spor
ts
play
grou
nds
and
equi
pped
fo
r ch
ildre
n co
mpa
red
to n
umbe
r of
chi
ldre
n /
gove
rnor
ates
/are
a/ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
Hig
her C
ounc
il of
Yo
uth
and
Spor
tsA
nnua
lly
Num
ber o
f org
aniz
atio
ns le
d by
child
ren
and
yout
h (p
arlia
men
ts, u
nion
s)by
age/
area
/disa
bilit
yM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
rA
nnua
lly
Num
ber
of tr
aini
ng p
rogr
ams
child
ren
rece
ived
in
jour
nalis
m,
plan
ning
, pr
oduc
ing,
and
pre
sent
ing
TV
and
radi
o pr
ogra
ms a
nd th
e med
ia sk
ills d
urin
g a c
erta
in ti
me p
erio
d
Rad
io, T
V an
d lo
cal
statio
nsA
nnua
lly
Perc
enta
ge o
f sp
ecia
lized
chi
ldre
n’s T
V p
rogr
ams
out o
f the
tota
l num
ber o
f pro
gram
sR
adio
, TV
and
loca
l pr
ivat
e sta
tions
Ann
ually
Num
ber o
f sp
ecia
lized
chi
ldre
n’s p
lays
by
area
/and
du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Cul
ture
Ann
ually
Num
ber
of su
mm
er c
amps
and
par
ticip
ants
dur
ing
the s
umm
er b
y dist
ribut
ion/
age/
sex
Hig
her C
ounc
il of
Yo
uth
and
Spor
ts,
loca
l gov
ernm
ent,
mun
icip
aliti
es
Ann
ually
Num
ber
and
type
of
vo
lunt
ary
activ
ities
th
at
child
ren
and
yout
h pa
rtic
ipat
e in
dur
ing
a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Yout
h Fo
rum
s, lo
cal g
over
nmen
t, m
unic
ipal
ities
Ann
ually
Process Indicators
45Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Num
ber o
f cul
tura
l and
recr
eatio
nal c
entr
es o
f chi
ld
by
geog
raph
ic
loca
tion/
activ
ity
type
/abs
orpt
ion
capa
city
Min
istry
of C
ultu
re,
PCBS
Ann
ually
Num
ber
of r
ecre
atio
nal
plac
es p
rovi
ded
by t
he
gove
rnm
ent
to c
hild
ren/
by
area
/gov
erno
rate
/age
/ty
pe
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent,
mun
icip
aliti
esA
nnua
lly
Broa
dcas
ting h
ours
of c
hild
ren’s
pro
gram
s out
of t
he
tota
l bro
adca
sting
tim
e/w
eek
(Rad
io an
d T
V)
Rad
io, T
V an
d lo
cal
statio
nsA
nnua
lly
Num
ber o
f new
spap
ers t
hat i
ssue
a ch
ildre
n’s se
ctio
nM
inist
ry o
f Cul
ture
Ann
ually
Num
ber o
f ch
ildre
n’s w
eekl
y/m
onth
ly m
agaz
ines
Min
istry
of C
ultu
reA
nnua
lly
Aver
age
num
ber
of h
ours
chi
ldre
n sp
ent
wat
chin
g T
V b
y le
vel o
f edu
catio
n of
the
mot
her/
econ
omic
sit
uatio
n of
the f
amily
PCBS
4 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f ch
ildre
n an
d yo
uth
part
icip
ants
in
festi
vals/
age/
area
/nat
ure o
f fes
tival
/sex
Min
istry
of C
ultu
re
Perc
enta
ge o
f fam
ilies
mon
itorin
g th
e T
V, P
C a
nd
inte
rnet
use
by t
heir
child
ren
/ by n
atur
e of p
rogr
ams
/ num
ber o
f hou
rs
PCBS
4 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f you
th p
arlia
men
t can
dida
tes b
y ar
ea/
type
of e
lect
ion/
age/
sex
Cen
tral
Ele
ctio
n C
omm
issio
n, L
ocal
G
over
nmen
t
Acc
ordi
ng to
the
elec
tora
l cyc
le
Process Indicators Outcome Indicators
46
Rig
hts o
f Chi
ldre
n w
ith D
isabi
lity (
Art
icle
23)
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
efini
tion/
Det
ails
Avai
labi
lity
of s
peci
fic l
egal
fra
mew
ork,
exe
cutiv
e re
gula
tions
and
au
thor
ities
on
right
s of c
hild
ren
with
disa
bilit
yM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
PLC
The d
egre
e of h
arm
ony a
mon
gst a
ll th
e nat
iona
l law
s and
pol
icie
s tha
t pe
rtai
n to
child
ren
with
a di
sabi
lity
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPL
CIC
HR
Avai
labi
lity
of n
atio
nal p
olic
ies,
plan
s and
bud
gets
nee
ded
to re
aliz
e th
e rig
hts o
f ch
ildre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y an
d gi
ving
them
the
acce
ss to
th
e nee
ded
serv
ices
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsH
ighe
r Cou
ncil
of D
isabi
lity
Avai
labi
lity
of m
onito
ring,
eval
uatio
n, ac
coun
tabi
lity
and
com
plai
nts
mec
hani
smM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Avai
labi
lity
of d
etai
led
and
clas
sified
list
of c
riter
ia o
n di
sabi
lity
and
serv
ices
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsA
ccor
ding
to
the
disa
bilit
y ca
rd t
hat
is be
ing
deve
lope
d at
the m
omen
t
Avai
labi
lity m
echa
nism
s to
mob
ilize
supp
ort a
nd so
lidar
ity an
d ra
ising
le
vels
of aw
aren
ess o
n th
e rig
hts o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsN
umbe
r of
pol
icie
s, le
gisla
tions
and
pro
gram
s th
at t
arge
t ch
ildre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
yM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
PLC
3 ye
ars
General Structural Indicators
47Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Perc
enta
ge o
f spe
ndin
g on
disa
bilit
ies a
nd c
hild
ren
with
a d
isabi
lity
by t
ype
of s
ervi
ce a
nd t
ype
of d
isabi
lity
and
durin
g a
cert
ain
time
perio
d by
all s
ervi
ce p
rovi
ders
, per
cent
age o
f sup
port
allo
cate
d fo
r the
di
sabi
lity s
ecto
r and
the p
erce
ntag
e allo
cate
d to
child
ren
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Fin
ance
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Ann
ual –
3 ye
ars
(acc
ordi
ng to
pl
an)
Num
ber o
f pub
lic b
uild
ings
and
tran
spor
tatio
n eq
uipp
ed fo
r the
use
by
child
ren
with
disa
bilit
y by a
rea a
nd ye
ar o
f con
struc
tion
Min
istry
of L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent,
mun
icip
aliti
es, M
inist
ry o
f Tr
ansp
orta
tion
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of
reha
bilit
atio
n in
stitu
tions
an
d ce
ntre
s an
d sp
ecia
l ed
ucat
ion
cent
res c
once
rned
with
chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y de
taile
d by
area
, abs
orpt
ion
capa
city
, typ
e of d
isabi
lity
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r3-
5 ye
ars
Sour
ce: S
tudy
, The I
nter
natio
nal F
ound
atio
n fo
r the
Phy
sical
ly D
isabl
ed an
d C
riter
ia o
f M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
and
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
Num
ber/
Perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rson
nel
qual
ified
to
deal
with
chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y an
d th
eir d
istrib
utio
n an
d sp
ecia
lty co
mpa
red
to th
e nu
mbe
r of c
hild
ren
with
a di
sabi
lity
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
A
Ann
ual
Payi
ng at
tent
ion
to th
e iss
ues o
f lic
ense
, re
gistr
atio
n, sp
ecia
lty, a
nd th
e ava
ilabi
lity o
f m
onito
ring
Deg
ree o
f im
plem
entin
g em
ploy
men
t of 3
-5%
of
han
dica
pped
in in
stitu
tions
Num
ber o
f med
ia an
d ra
dio
prog
ram
s tha
t tar
get t
he ri
ghts
of c
hild
ren
with
disa
bilit
y, pr
even
tion
and
early
det
ectio
n pe
r yea
rM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Med
iaU
NRW
AC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
ns
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f aw
aren
ess c
ampa
igns
that
targ
et th
e rig
hts o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith
a disa
bilit
y, pr
even
tion
and
early
det
ectio
n pe
r yea
rC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of Y
outh
and
Spor
tsM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPa
lesti
ne B
road
casti
ng
Cor
pora
tion
Ann
ual
Process Indicators
48
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho re
ceiv
e so
cial
ass
istan
ce b
y ty
pe (m
edic
ine,
heal
th in
sura
nce,
supp
ortiv
e too
ls, tr
eatm
ent,
etc.)
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ries
of c
once
rn s
uch
as
Min
istry
of H
ealth
and
Min
istry
of
Edu
catio
n
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of f
amili
es t
hat
have
acc
ess
to s
ervi
ces
for
child
ren
with
a
disa
bilit
y by
typ
e of
disa
bilit
y, ty
pe o
f se
rvic
e, ag
e, ar
ea, s
ocio
-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion,
educ
atio
nal l
evel
of p
aren
ts
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsA
nnua
l
Num
ber
of fa
mili
es t
hat
do n
ot h
ave
acce
ss t
o se
rvic
es fo
r ch
ildre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y and
the r
easo
ns b
ehin
d th
atSu
rvey
s3
year
s
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y who
still
go
to sc
hool
by s
tage
an
d ar
eaM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nA
nnua
l
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y who
are n
ot in
scho
ol an
d th
e re
ason
s beh
ind
that
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsA
nnua
l
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho le
arn
in sp
ecia
l cen
tres
for c
hild
ren
with
di
sabi
litie
sC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f disa
bilit
y rat
es am
ong c
hild
ren
deta
iled
by ca
use,
type
of
disa
bilit
y, ag
e, ar
ea, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic si
tuat
ion,
enr
ollm
ent i
n sc
hool
s, se
x, a
cces
s to
bas
ic h
ealth
and
reh
abili
tatio
n se
rvic
es, e
tc. d
urin
g a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs
Surv
eys o
f PC
BS
3 ye
ars
As p
er th
e Disa
bilit
y Law
199
9, P
ales
tine C
hild
La
w, D
isabi
lity S
urve
y of P
CBS
201
1
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n re
cord
ed in
the d
isabi
lity c
ard
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsA
nnua
l
Outcome Indicators
49Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Gaps and ObstaclesAdministrative records, currently, only cover the information on those receiving certain services (regular enrollment in education, vaccines, birth records, children in dispute with the law, etc.), and do not hold any information on children that don’t have access to such services. There is still a need to develop such records, the methods of recording the information, and more training and developing the capabilities of personnel in order to improve the quality and availability of information recorded in the proper time. Furthermore, the development specific indicators, definitions and mechanisms of gathering, storing and analyzing the available information is needed, as most institutions depend on the information they receive and have a limited capability to research information from the field. This results in PCBS depending on the information it gathers by other means, such as the information gathered from surveys instead of fully depending on the administrative records. In addition, information classification requires more focus.
As previously mentioned, national surveys conducted by PCBS mostly include more information on the violation of the rights of the child in general, as it includes all areas in the OPT and benefits from the national census in preparing the sample. This requires PCBS and concerned executive bodies to develop a set of indicators that they are working on monitoring routinely. Many surveys depend on external funding and have not yet been institutionalized \ as main national surveys. This high dependency on funding to support the surveys led to the imposition of certain indicators that are being collected, based on the type of the project funded. Consequently, health and educational surveys are being done with a high degree of repetition, while surveys on children in need of protection remains rare due to lack of focus by donors on supporting them in this field.
Information gathering based on constantly changing measurements of population groups, definitions (and their types wide or narrow), timeframe, age group, areas, degree of details, and others criteria led to the formation of a big depot of data. However, it is not easy to try to benefit from such data as it is difficult to make comparisons, and a benchmark for the information has not been specified. Criteria differs based on the service providers, and the objective of information gathering. Additional services should be provided to marginalized groups of the population. Changing the definition leads to a change in the obligations related to it. Therefore, not unifying the criteria and definitions on the national level leads to children becoming a victim of the differences among the systems as per the service providers, and consequently of inequality and discrimination. Some examples on that:
50
Example 1: Poverty Indicators:This indicator is considered on a high degree of sensitivity on the national level. The specification of the level of the poverty line and the extreme poverty line is connected to obligations on the SP towards the groups below the poverty line as an example. The increase in percentage means more obligations on the SP and Ministry of Social Affairs.
Example 2: Disability Indicators:The definition of the indicator and setting certain criteria obligates the SP to provide a package of services that depend on the degree of disability.
Example 3: School dropout Indicators:Ministry of Education has records on dropout rates and causes; however, the information doesn’t necessarily reveal the deprivation from education (by force) or the situation of the children who have dropped out of school.
Obstacles:• Political Will
• Financial Resources
• Human Resources (Knowledge, skills, degree of motivation)
Recommendations• Priority should be given to developing a national registry for surveys,clear, specific
indicators and methodologies, monitoring methods and sufficient skills to collect data inside the executive ministries of relation, PCBS, non-governmental organization, private sector and international organizations. Allocation of resources from the government towards children related to surveys should be increased.
• Work on developing specific indicators, definitions and mechanisms to collect data and allocating sufficient resources (technical and financial) to create room to develop systems on the level of governorates by which they can collect, store and analyze the available information on the national level.
• Sources of data should be identified clearly and the training on collecting reliable, valid and timely information and data on the indictors of child’s rights should be with ministries, bodies, foster homes and institutions that have children. All information should be classified by child’s age, sex, location of residence and socio-economic situation.
• Special attention should be given to data about marginalized children as data
51Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
derived from different sources is not contradiction free. This process should entail coordination among partners from governmental bodies, civil institutions and the private sector who provide assistance and support to the marginalized children (poor children, children with a disability, juveniles, workers, Bedouins, refugees and children from marginalized areas such as what so called Area C, areas close to the Expansion wall, areas of contact, East Jerusalem, and Gaza).
• PCBS should conduct a national review for the definitions and criteria used in the survey to identify the degree of harmony with the definitions and criteria used in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the laws applicable in the country.
• Ministry teams responsible for preparing the administrative records related to the rights of the child on means of data gathering. Information shouldn’t only be limited to representing the cases which receive services; reports should include the violations and those who don’t receive services. The process should also be in harmony with the principles of the rights of the child and the Palestinian Child Law and consequently will affect the general framework of planning and policy drawing.
Way ForwardThis participatory process aims at institutionalizing the indicators of the rights of the child within institutions, ministries, regulations and national plans, therefore:
• PCBS should agree with the ministries of concern on the vision of mechanisms and sources of collecting and analyzing reliable national data (for example: is there a need to have an independent department in every ministry and central department for monitoring and evaluation, what are the surveys needed and the timeframe/right frequency to measure it, and consequently identifying the human resources and the budgets as a result of that, programs and services, and capabilities needed, role of UNRWA, civil society institutions, private sector, and specialized studies and research in feeding and analyzing the information; and the importance of having a specialized committee to analyze information and connecting the different subjects and sectors; evaluating the available data, its creditability, reliability to feed the national plans and setting the budgets based on facts and not only on impressions and perceptions). This is the principle of PCBS’s work and which is derived, in essence, from the national strategy of official statistics.
• There is also a need that children should be part of these efforts and that their points of view, opinions and participation should be heard out. From the suggested surveys during the next years, it is possible to address how children visualize themselves, their privacy, and how they are represented in the community, family, among peers, media; access to educational, health, social and recreational services and others.
52
• Coordination between all partners to ensure the unification of definitions and criteria on the national level and approve it. Unifying systems and connecting them among all service providers and in all sectors. Due to its importance in identifying its obligations implicated in the laws, legislation, policies and services; identifying details as much as possible, degree of punishment and consequences implicated from the different violations of children’s rights. Based on that, memorandum of understandings should be reviewed by PCBS and the different ministries.
• Institutionalization of the process of data collection through the different directorates, sectors and institutions should be used as a database and a system to follow up cases and work with ministries of concern on developing an electronic form to fill with information on children who receive services and detailed information on them.
53Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Ann
ex
(1):
Lis
t of a
ll in
dic
ato
rs th
at w
ere
dis
cus
sed
dur
ing
the
wo
rksh
op
s:Q
uant
itativ
e Pro
tect
ion
Indi
cato
rs (A
rtic
les 3
, 5, 1
0, 1
9, 2
0, 3
7, 3
8)In
dica
tor
Sour
ceTy
peFr
eque
ncy
Det
ails
Num
ber o
f dom
estic
vio
lence
case
s aga
inst
child
ren
by se
x, ar
ea, l
evel
of
educ
atio
n of
par
ents
and
soci
o-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
of th
e fam
ilyM
inist
ry
of
Soci
al
Affa
irs
– A
dmin
istra
tive R
ecor
dsPo
lice
UN
RWA
Ann
ual
The a
vaila
bilit
y of s
tudi
es o
n do
mes
tic vi
olen
ce
Num
ber
of a
nti-v
iolen
ce a
war
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
at
the
leve
l of
fam
ily,
scho
ol an
d co
mm
unity
Perc
enta
ge o
f wor
king
child
ren
deta
iled
by se
x, ag
e, ar
ea an
d ca
use,
leve
l of
educ
atio
n of
par
ents
, edu
catio
nal s
tage
of t
he ch
ild; t
ype,
natu
re, a
nd
hour
s of w
ork
and
aver
age p
ay
Min
istry
of L
abou
rPC
BS1-
3 ye
ars
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of a
war
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
tha
t ta
rget
chi
ldre
n an
d fa
mili
es o
n th
e su
bjec
ts o
f pro
tect
ion
and
haza
rds o
f chi
ld la
bour
, esp
ecia
lly w
hen
cont
radi
ctin
g with
thei
r hea
lth an
d ed
ucat
iona
l rig
hts
Num
ber
of
insti
tutio
ns c
once
rned
with
str
eet
child
ren
deta
iled
by
distr
ibut
ion,
type
, abs
orpt
ion
capa
city
, num
ber e
nrol
led
(sex
, age
, cau
se)
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r3-
5 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f juv
enile
insti
tutio
nsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
3-5
year
s
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n en
rolle
d in
the j
uven
ile in
stitu
tions
by s
ex, a
ge, a
rea,
caus
e, re
ason
Num
ber o
f ins
titut
ions
that
pro
vide
lega
l ass
istan
ce to
det
aine
d ju
veni
les
and
child
ren
Aver
age t
ime o
f det
entio
n an
d nu
mbe
r of a
rres
ts at
cent
res
Hig
her J
udic
ial C
ounc
ilA
ttor
ney G
ener
al’s
Offi
ceIC
HR
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n de
tain
ed b
efor
e tria
l
54
Num
ber a
nd p
erce
ntag
e of c
hild
ren
deta
ined
at in
stitu
tions
not
spec
ified
fo
r chi
ldre
nN
umbe
r of
insti
tutio
ns t
hat
prov
ide
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d re
-inte
grat
ion
serv
ices
to ch
ildre
n vi
ctim
s of v
iolen
ce an
d ab
use,
juve
nile
s, an
d w
orke
rs
by d
istrib
utio
n, ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
, typ
e, an
d ty
pe o
f ser
vice
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
–
Adm
inist
rativ
e Rec
ords
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of c
hild
ben
efici
arie
s of
reh
abili
tatio
n an
d re
-inte
grat
ion
prog
ram
s (ju
veni
les,
wor
kers
, vic
tims
of v
iolen
ce a
nd e
xplo
itatio
n) b
y ag
e, ar
ea, s
ex ,c
ause
, etc
.
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
–
Adm
inist
rativ
e Rec
ords
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f rep
orte
d ca
ses o
f offe
nce,
mal
trea
tmen
t and
exp
loita
tion
at
hom
e, sc
hool
, soc
iety
, det
entio
n an
d ar
rest
cent
res,
and
care
cent
res
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPo
lice
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of w
orke
rs w
ith c
hild
ren
in t
he fi
elds
of
prot
ectio
n su
ch a
s ju
dges
, pro
secu
tors
, sec
urity
, juve
nile
justi
ce, p
sych
olog
ists a
nd so
cial
ists
and
prob
atio
n offi
cers
Min
istry
of
Soci
al A
ffairs
– S
ocia
l Pr
otec
tion
Net
wor
kA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f day
care
hom
es b
y typ
e, ar
ea an
d ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
to h
elp
wor
king
par
ents
in ra
ising
the c
hild
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs3-
5 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed fr
om p
aren
ts’ c
are
or b
y ca
uses
, are
a, ag
e an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Surv
eys
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f orp
hane
d ch
ildre
n by
sex,
age,
and
area
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsZa
kat
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of o
rpha
n re
siden
ce i
nstit
utio
ns b
y ar
ea, d
istrib
utio
n, t
ype,
abso
rptio
n ca
paci
tyM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Zaka
tM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r
3-5
year
s
Num
ber o
f spe
cial
pro
tect
ion
case
s tha
t wer
e pr
oces
sed
by M
inist
ry o
f So
cial
Affa
irs d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of
So
cial
A
ffairs
–
Adm
inist
rativ
e Rec
ords
Ann
ual
55Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Num
ber
of a
dopt
ed c
hild
ren,
or
unde
r sp
onso
rshi
p in
side
and
outs
ide
the c
ount
ryM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
Bure
au o
f Chi
ef Ju
dge
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho li
ve w
ith o
ne p
aren
tM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Bure
au o
f Chi
ef Ju
dge
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f per
iodi
cal h
ealth
revi
ews t
he ch
ild is
subj
ect t
o in
care
hom
esM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f per
iodi
cal j
udic
ial r
evie
ws t
he ca
re in
stitu
tions
cond
uct
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsBu
reau
of C
hief
Judg
eA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n ca
ught
in d
rug
and
psyc
hotr
opic
subs
tanc
e rel
ated
ca
ses
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPo
lice
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho re
ceiv
ed re
habi
litat
ion
and
heal
th se
rvic
es w
ho
wer
e affe
cted
with
dru
gsN
umbe
r of t
reat
men
t and
reha
bilit
atio
n ce
ntre
s, or
cent
res t
hat p
rovi
de
serv
ices
to d
rug a
buse
rs an
d ta
rget
child
ren
affec
ted
with
dru
gs b
y typ
e of
insti
tutio
n, se
rvic
e, di
strib
utio
n, ab
sorp
tion
capa
city
and
num
ber o
f the
en
rolle
d du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren
vict
ims
of m
ines
and
arm
ed c
onfli
ct b
y ar
ea, a
ge,
sex,
and
caus
e Po
lice
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsC
hild
ren
Def
ense
Inte
rnat
iona
lU
NIC
EFM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthO
CH
A
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of s
tudi
es t
hat
addr
esse
d th
e eff
ect
of a
rmed
con
flict
on
the
child
ren
Num
ber o
f po
or c
hild
ren
by a
rea,
sex,
age
, situ
atio
n of
the
head
of t
he
fam
ily, t
he h
ealth
and
educ
atio
nal s
ituat
ion,
etc.
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsU
NRW
ASu
rvey
s/PC
BS
1-3
year
s/ac
cord
ing t
o th
e na
tiona
l pla
ns
56
Perc
enta
ge o
f fam
ilies
bel
ow p
over
ty li
ne an
d ha
ve ch
ildre
n (d
etai
led
by
distr
ibut
ion,
leve
l of e
duca
tion,
num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n, h
ealth
situ
atio
n of
th
e chi
ldre
n, ch
roni
c dise
ase o
r disa
bilit
y, et
c.)N
umbe
r of s
tudi
es th
at ad
dres
sed
the e
ffect
of p
over
ty o
n ch
ildre
nN
umbe
r of c
hild
refu
gees
(det
aile
d by
geog
raph
ical
dist
ribut
ion,
age,
sex,
so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n, ed
ucat
ion,
etc.)
PCBS
UN
RWA
Ref
ugee
s Affa
irs O
ffice
3-5
year
s
Num
ber
of t
rain
ing
prog
ram
s th
at t
arge
t ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n w
orke
rs b
y en
tity,
type
of t
rain
ing,
num
ber o
f par
ticip
ants
, dist
ribut
ion
(uni
fied
and
syst
emat
ic o
n th
e nat
iona
l lev
el)
Min
istry
of
Soci
al A
ffairs
– S
ocia
l Pr
otec
tion
Net
wor
kC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
APe
rcen
tage
of t
he a
ctua
l spe
ndin
g on
chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n ou
t of t
he to
tal
spen
ding
57Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Prot
ectio
n Q
ualit
ativ
e Ind
icat
ors
Indi
cato
rSo
urce
Type
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of c
hild
hood
pro
tect
ions
net
wor
kAv
aila
ble o
r una
vaila
ble
Type
Impl
emen
tatio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of s
peci
aliz
ed d
epar
tmen
ts in
child
pro
tect
ion
in th
e m
inist
ries c
once
rned
; Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs, M
inist
ry o
f Lab
our,
Polic
e, co
urts
Avai
labi
lity o
f leg
al, l
egisl
ativ
e and
pol
icy f
ram
ewor
k fo
r the
pro
tect
ion
of th
e chi
ldAv
aila
bilit
y of l
ong t
erm
pla
n fo
r the
pro
tect
ion
of th
e chi
ld (h
uman
an
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces n
eede
d, p
rogr
ams)
Avai
labi
lity o
f eth
ical
and
coun
selin
g crit
eria
to p
rote
ct th
e chi
ld fr
om
all f
orm
s of v
iolen
ce an
d in
all l
ocat
ions
Avai
labi
lity o
f pro
cedu
res t
o pr
otec
t the
child
agai
nst a
buse
, nee
d,
begg
ing,
evas
ion,
neg
ligen
ce, t
ortu
re, e
xplo
itatio
n, an
d ph
ysic
al an
d ps
ycho
logi
cal v
iolen
ce.
Avai
labi
lity n
atio
nal a
nd u
nifie
d de
finiti
ons o
f vio
lence
, abu
se, p
hysic
al
and
psyc
holo
gica
l abu
se, n
eglig
ence
, phy
sical
pun
ishm
ent,
etc.
Avai
labi
lity p
roce
dure
s to
supp
ort p
aren
ts an
d le
gal g
uard
ians
to ra
ise
the c
hild
Avai
labi
lity o
f sys
tem
atic
mon
itorin
g and
acco
unta
bilit
y mec
hani
sms
for a
ll ch
ild ca
re an
d pr
otec
tion
insti
tutio
ns.
58
Rig
ht o
f the
child
in h
ealth
and
surv
ival
(Art
icle
s 6, 1
8, 2
4)Q
uant
itativ
e Ind
icat
ors
Sour
ce (C
urre
ntly
)10Ty
peFr
eque
ncy
Det
ails
Mor
talit
y ra
te
of
infa
nts,11
by
ca
uses
, tim
e pe
riod,
ge
ogra
phic
al
distr
ibut
ion
by (g
over
nora
te) 12
, sex
, age
grou
p, so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n,
and
the l
evel
of e
duca
tion
of th
e mot
her.
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
e – A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
Avai
labl
eA
nnua
lA
que
stion
naire
re
gard
ing d
ecea
sed
infa
nts u
nder
on
e yea
r of a
ge is
av
aila
ble,
but d
oesn
’t in
clud
e cla
ssifi
catio
n by
the s
ocio
-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
and
the l
evel
of
educ
atio
n of
the
mot
her.
Perc
enta
ge o
f ch
ildre
n w
ho s
uffer
fro
m m
alnu
triti
on in
clud
ing
thos
e w
ho su
ffer c
hron
ic m
alnu
triti
on (A
nem
ia, w
astin
g, lo
w w
eigh
t, st
untin
g,
vita
min
A d
efici
ency
, iod
ine d
efici
ency
) or a
cute
mal
nutr
ition
or d
ue to
la
ck o
f cle
an w
ater
by
age,
area
, sex
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n an
d th
e le
vel o
f edu
catio
n of
the m
othe
r, an
d tim
e per
iod.
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
e and
Nut
ritio
n Su
rvei
llanc
e - A
dmin
istra
tive R
ecor
dsU
NRW
A –
Rec
ords
PCBS
Ann
ual
Expa
nd th
e Nut
ritio
n Su
rvei
llanc
e pro
gram
an
d re
duci
ng
repe
titio
n
Perc
enta
ge o
f tho
se e
atin
g sw
eets
, pot
ato
chip
s, an
d w
ho re
gula
rly h
ave
brea
kfas
t by a
ge g
roup
, sex
, gov
erno
rate
, etc
.Pe
rcen
tage
of s
pend
ing o
n th
e hea
lth se
ctor
(allo
cate
d fo
r the
sect
or an
d ac
tual
spen
ding
) an
d pe
rcen
tage
of s
pend
ing
on th
e ch
ild in
a c
erta
in
time
perio
d by
serv
ice
prov
ider
, typ
e of
serv
ice
(trea
tmen
t, pr
even
tion,
re
habi
litat
ion)
Min
istry
of H
ealth
and
Min
istry
of
Fina
nce
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate s
ecto
rPC
BS -
Surv
eys
1-3
year
s
10 It
is p
refe
rred
to h
ave a
uni
fied
natio
nal s
ourc
e of i
nfor
mat
ion
that
incl
udes
hea
lth in
form
atio
n by
all s
ervi
ce p
rovi
ders
(gov
ernm
enta
l, U
NRW
A, p
rivat
e sec
tor a
nd ci
vil s
ocie
ty)
11 Th
ere i
s a n
eed
to d
evel
op an
d ex
pand
the q
uesti
onna
ire re
gard
ing
dece
ased
child
ren
to in
clud
e chi
ldre
n 1-
less
than
18
year
s and
to ad
d th
e soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n of
the f
amily
and
the l
evel
of e
duca
tion
of th
e mot
her,
and
cond
uct t
rain
ing o
n it.
It i
s pos
sible
that
this
will
not
take
pla
ce so
on as
it n
eeds
muc
h po
litic
al? s
uppo
rt to
mak
e it h
appe
n.
12 R
ural
, city
and
cam
ps, g
over
nora
tes,
Wes
t Ban
k, E
ast J
erus
alem
, Gaz
a, A
rea C
59Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Perc
enta
ge o
f mot
hers
who
hav
e acc
ess t
o he
alth
care
serv
ices
bef
ore a
nd
after
birt
h by
qua
lified
med
ical
per
sonn
el an
d a s
afe d
eliv
ery i
n ho
spita
ls by
area
and
leve
l of e
duca
tion
of th
e mot
her i
n a c
erta
in ti
me p
erio
d
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
entr
e – A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
– R
ecor
dsU
NRW
A -
Adm
inist
rativ
e Rec
ords
PCBS
- Su
rvey
s
3 ye
ars
Num
ber
of q
ualifi
ed a
nd l
icen
sed
med
ical
tea
ms;
thei
r cl
assifi
catio
n,
distr
ibut
ion,
sex
, inc
ome
leve
l (ph
ysic
ians
, spe
cial
ists,
dent
ists,
nurs
es,
phar
mac
ists,
mid
wiv
es, n
utrit
ioni
sts,
psyc
hiat
rists
, psy
chol
ogist
s, et
c.)
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Lice
nsed
he
alth
care
pro
fess
iona
lsC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
ns
Priv
ate s
ecto
rU
NRW
AU
nion
s
Ann
ual
For e
very
10,
000
of
the p
opul
atio
nC
urre
ntly
una
vaila
ble
licen
sed
med
ical
te
ams,
sex,
inco
me
leve
l nut
ritio
nist
s, ps
ychi
atris
ts, a
nd
psyc
holo
gist
sN
umbe
r/pe
rcen
tage
of c
hild
ren
who
suffe
r fro
m ch
roni
c dise
ase b
y ag
e, ge
ogra
phic
al a
rea,
sex,
soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n, f
amily
hist
ory
in a
ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
and
the n
umbe
r of n
ew ca
ses
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
- A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
Nat
iona
l Can
cer R
egist
ryN
atio
nal C
entr
e for
Chr
onic
Dise
ases
- A
dmin
istra
tive R
ecor
ds
Ann
ual
For e
very
100
,000
ch
ild
Num
ber/
perc
enta
ge of
child
ren
who
suffe
r fro
m h
ered
itary
or co
ngen
ital
dise
ases
by
age,
sex,
geo
grap
hica
l are
a, so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n du
ring
a cer
tain
tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of
H
ealth
–
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Cen
tre
- A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
- Adm
inist
rativ
e Rec
ords
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f ch
ildre
n in
fect
ed b
y co
mm
unic
able
dise
ases
dur
ing
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
that
cou
ld b
e av
oide
d by
vac
cina
tion
(per
tuss
is,
diph
ther
ia, t
etan
us, H
epat
itis B
, mea
sles a
nd G
erm
an m
easle
s (R
ubel
la),
polio
mye
litis,
AID
S, tu
berc
ulos
is) b
y age
and
area
Min
istry
of H
ealth
(M
onito
ring
and
cont
rol s
yste
m)
UN
RWA
Ann
ual
Mor
talit
y rat
e of m
othe
rs b
y age
, cau
ses,
geog
raph
ic d
istrib
utio
n , s
ocio
-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
durin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r
Ann
ual
For e
very
100
,000
60
Perc
enta
ge o
f vac
cina
tion
cove
rage
by
type
, are
as, a
ge, s
ex, e
duca
tion
of
mot
her,
etc.
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
PC
BS -
Surv
eys
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f fu
ll br
eastf
eedi
ng u
ntil
the a
ge o
f six
mon
ths b
y ar
ea, s
ex,
job
of m
othe
r, so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
n, a
ge o
f mot
her,
edu
catio
n of
m
othe
r, et
c. du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d
Min
istry
of H
ealth
–N
utrit
ion
Surv
eilla
nce
PCBS
- Su
rvey
s
3 ye
ars
Chi
ldre
n un
til th
e en
d of
the fi
fth
mon
th o
f the
ir ag
e w
ho st
ill ar
e bre
astfe
d by
thei
r mot
her a
nd
who
did
n’t e
at an
y ar
tifici
al m
ilk, f
ood,
or
drin
k. V
itam
ins
and
med
icin
e are
ex
clud
edC
hild
ren
who
wer
e br
eastf
ed b
y th
eir
mot
her
durin
g th
e fir
st h
our
of
thei
r age
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– N
utrit
ion
Surv
eilla
nce
PCBS
- Su
rvey
sN
umbe
r of
vio
latio
ns o
f the
Nat
iona
l sys
tem
to m
arke
t alte
rnat
ives
of
mot
her’s
milk
Min
istry
of H
ealth
–N
utrit
ion
Surv
eilla
nce
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho fi
nish
ed b
reas
tfeed
ing
for t
he fi
rst t
wo
year
s of
thei
r life
Min
istry
of H
ealth
–N
utrit
ion
Surv
eilla
nce
Perc
enta
ge o
f ch
ildre
n w
ho w
ere
infe
cted
with
res
pira
tory
dise
ases
du
ring
a cer
tain
tim
e per
iod
deta
iled
by a
ge, s
ex, a
rea,
leve
l of e
duca
tion
of m
othe
r, w
ay o
f tre
atm
ent
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
PCBS
UN
RWA
- R
ecor
dsPr
ivat
e sec
tor -
Rec
ords
Perc
enta
ge/n
umbe
r of
chi
ldre
n w
ho h
ave
acce
ss t
o he
alth
ser
vice
s, in
form
atio
n an
d co
unse
ling
that
gua
rant
ee p
rivac
y in
a c
erta
in t
ime
perio
d
PCBS
– S
urve
ys3-
5 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f abo
rtio
ns (n
umbe
r of r
ecor
ded
case
s and
caus
es) r
ecor
ded
durin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– A
dmin
istra
tive
Rec
ords
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ld sm
oker
s dur
ing
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
by a
ge, c
ause
, an
d ar
eaPC
BS –
Sur
veys
3 ye
ars
61Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Perc
enta
ge o
f ne
gativ
e sm
oker
s am
ong
child
ren
durin
g a
cert
ain
time
perio
d by
age,
area
and
caus
e Su
rvey
s3-
5 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho ab
used
dru
gs d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
by
area
, cau
se an
d ag
eSu
rvey
s3
year
s
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ho e
at su
ffici
ent f
ood
(cal
orie
s, pr
otei
ns, f
ruit,
ve
geta
bles
, etc
.) by
area
, age
and
soci
o-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
Surv
eys
3-5
year
s
Perc
enta
ge o
f can
cer s
urvi
val r
ates
amon
g chi
ldre
nM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth -N
atio
nal C
ance
r R
egist
ryPe
rcen
tage
of g
irls w
ho w
ere 1
8 ye
ars o
r yo
unge
r on
thei
r firs
t pre
gnan
cy
durin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod,
and
perc
enta
ge o
f end
ogam
yPC
BS –
Sur
veys
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f girl
s who
wer
e old
er th
an 3
5 an
d yo
unge
r tha
n 18
year
s of
age w
hen
they
gav
e birt
hM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsPC
BS
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f po
pula
tion
who
hav
e ac
cess
to
safe
drin
king
wat
er a
nd
sew
age b
y are
a and
num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dPC
BS –
Sur
veys
Wat
er A
utho
rity
3 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f cam
paig
ns an
d pr
ogra
ms t
hat t
arge
t chi
ldre
n, d
river
s, tr
affic
polic
e, te
ache
rs a
nd f
amily
on
traffi
c sa
fety
dur
ing
the
year
and
the
re
spon
sible
par
ty
Min
istry
of T
rans
port
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Med
ical
Insti
tutio
n to
Pre
vent
Roa
d A
ccid
ents,
an
d D
epar
tmen
t of H
ealth
Edu
catio
n an
d Pr
omot
ion
Nat
iona
l Com
mitt
ee o
f Hea
lth
Educ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPa
lesti
ne B
road
casti
ng C
orpo
ratio
nC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
A
Ann
ual
62
Num
ber
of a
war
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
and
pro
gram
s to
com
bat
unhe
alth
y so
cial
hab
its su
ch a
s ear
ly m
arria
ge, e
ndog
amy,
smok
ing,
etc
. dur
ing
the
year
and
the r
espo
nsib
le p
arty
.
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth –
Dep
artm
ent
of
Hea
lth E
duca
tion
Nat
iona
l C
omm
ittee
of
H
ealth
Ed
ucat
ion
Civ
il So
ciet
y Ins
titut
ions
Pale
stine
Bro
adca
sting
Cor
pora
tion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n vi
sitin
g m
edic
al c
entr
es b
y ty
pe, a
ge, a
rea,
caus
e, et
c. du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsC
ivil
Soci
ety I
nstit
utio
nsPr
ivat
e sec
tor
UN
RWA
Ann
ual
Infe
ctio
n ra
te p
erce
ntag
e of d
iarr
hea b
y cau
se, g
eogr
aphi
cal a
rea,
age,
sex,
ed
ucat
ion
of m
othe
rM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth –
Adm
inist
rativ
e R
ecor
dsPr
ivat
e sec
tor
UN
RWA
PCBS
– S
urve
ys
1-3
year
s
Num
ber
and
distr
ibut
ion
of h
ealth
cen
tres
and
hos
pita
ls by
are
a, po
pula
tion
and
num
ber
of c
hild
ren,
and
qua
lified
and
spe
cial
ized
pe
rson
nel b
y ser
vice
pro
vide
r in
a cer
tain
tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il So
ciet
y Ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate s
ecto
rU
NRW
A
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n co
mm
ittin
g su
icid
e du
ring
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
with
det
ails
on ag
e, ca
use,
area
, sex
, etc
.M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
rPo
lice
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f spe
ndin
g on
the
3rd
leve
l hea
lth c
are
outs
ide
tran
sfers
as
a per
cent
age o
f gov
ernm
ent h
ealth
bud
get
durin
g a c
erta
in ti
me p
erio
d an
d th
e rea
sons
beh
ind
that
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth –
Tra
nsfe
rs a
nd
Insu
ranc
e Dep
artm
ent
Min
istry
of F
inan
ce
Ann
ual
63Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Hou
seho
ld d
ensit
y an
d its
rela
tion
to th
e sp
read
of c
onta
giou
s dise
ases
su
ch as
inte
stina
l wor
ms,
men
ingi
tis, e
tc.
PCBS
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Num
ber
of c
hild
ren
with
hea
lth in
sura
nce
or s
ocia
l sec
urity
cov
erag
e de
taile
d by
area
, edu
catio
n of
mot
her,
type
of i
nsur
ance
dur
ing
a cer
tain
tim
e per
iod
PCBS
– S
urve
ysIn
sura
nce c
ompa
nies
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth –
Dep
artm
ent
of
Insu
ranc
e
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed fr
om ac
cess
to h
ealth
serv
ices
bec
ause
of
sett
lers a
nd ch
eck
poin
ts d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
PCBS
– S
urve
ysO
CH
A an
d U
N ag
enci
esA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f eva
luat
ion
stud
ies o
f diff
eren
t int
erve
ntio
ns d
urin
g a c
erta
in
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
A
3-5
year
s
Num
ber o
f nut
ritio
n, h
ealth
, and
coun
selin
g pro
gram
s in
scho
ols b
y typ
e of
sch
ool,
num
ber
of ta
rget
stu
dent
s, sta
ge, a
rea
durin
g a
cert
ain
time
perio
d
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of h
ouse
and
fiel
d vi
sits
in t
he r
emot
e an
d po
or a
reas
by
popu
latio
n in
the
are
a, an
d nu
mbe
r of
chi
ldre
n du
ring
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
Min
istry
of H
ealth
UN
RWA
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f rep
orte
d co
mpl
aint
s on
the
viol
atio
n of
the
child
’s rig
ht o
f he
alth
dur
ing a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dIC
HR
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– H
ealth
Com
plain
tsA
nnua
l
Num
ber o
f pro
cess
ed c
ompl
aint
s on
the
viol
atio
n of
the
child
’s rig
ht o
f he
alth
IC
HR
Min
istry
of H
ealth
– H
ealth
Com
plain
tsA
nnua
l
64
Qua
litat
ive H
ealth
Indi
cato
rsSo
urce
Type
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of
cle
ar p
roto
cols
to d
eal w
ith e
mer
genc
y ca
ses,
med
ical
ne
glig
ence
, and
abus
eM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthAv
aila
ble o
r U
nava
ilabl
eD
egre
e of
impl
emen
tatio
nQ
ualit
y of
impl
emen
tatio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of
law
s and
mea
sure
s for
the p
rovi
sion
of fr
ee b
asic
med
ical
ca
re fo
r chi
ldre
n un
der 1
8 ye
ars o
f age
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Min
istry
of F
inan
ceAv
aila
bilit
y of
nee
ded,
sys
tem
atic
and
uni
fied
trai
ning
in t
he fi
eld
of
heal
th ed
ucat
ion
and
right
s and
hea
lth o
f the
child
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate S
ecto
rU
NRW
AAv
aila
bilit
y of
pro
cedu
res
to p
reve
nt d
isabi
lity,
com
plic
atio
ns a
nd
depe
nden
ce t
hrou
gh e
arly
det
ectio
n, p
reve
ntio
n, r
aisin
g th
e le
vel
of
awar
enes
s and
early
inte
rven
tion
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate S
ecto
rU
NRW
AAv
aila
bilit
y of p
roce
dure
s to
redu
ce an
d co
mba
t acc
iden
tsM
inist
ry
of
Hea
lth
– H
ealth
In
stitu
tion
Min
istry
of T
rans
port
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Int
erio
r – P
olic
eAv
aila
bilit
y of p
roto
cols
and p
roce
dure
s of m
onito
ring a
nd ac
coun
tabi
lity
Min
istry
of H
ealth
ICH
RA
ttor
ney G
ener
al’s
Offi
ceH
ealth
Uni
ons
Avai
labi
lity
of
proc
edur
es
to
com
bat
com
mun
icab
le
and
non-
com
mun
icab
le d
iseas
esM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth
Avai
labi
lity
of m
easu
res13
to
redu
ce m
orta
lity
rate
of i
nfan
ts, c
hild
ren
unde
r five
year
s of a
ge, m
othe
rs
Min
istry
of H
ealth
13 P
roce
dure
s and
mea
sure
s inc
lude
wha
t the
stat
e cou
ld p
ossib
ly co
nduc
t in
term
s of r
evie
ws,
mon
itorin
g, es
tabl
ishin
g of s
peci
al fu
nds o
r nat
iona
l bod
ies,
awar
enes
s cam
paig
ns; p
rovi
de p
olic
ies,
legi
slatio
n, la
ws,
strat
egie
s and
tr
ansp
orta
tion
supp
ort
65Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s to
red
uce
the
rate
of
early
mar
riage
and
pr
egna
ncy
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Bure
au o
f Chi
ef Ju
dge
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s to
ensu
re th
e reg
istra
tion
of n
ew b
orn
babi
es,
and
inve
stiga
ting a
nd re
gist
erin
g chi
ld m
orta
lity
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s to
red
uce
the
prob
abili
ty a
nd p
ract
ice
of
abor
tion
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Bure
au o
f Chi
ef Ju
dge
Avai
labi
lity
of m
echa
nism
to
prov
ide
basic
info
rmat
ion
and
supp
ort,
espe
cial
ly f
or c
hild
ren
and
fam
ily o
n ch
ildre
n’s h
ealth
, nu
triti
on,
brea
stfee
ding
, hea
lth, a
ccid
ents
, env
ironm
ent a
nd se
wag
e
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Priv
ate S
ecto
rU
NRW
AM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of p
roce
dure
s to
impr
ove f
ood
prod
uctio
n an
d ac
hiev
e foo
d se
curit
yM
inist
ry o
f Agr
icul
ture
Min
istry
of N
atio
nal E
cono
my
Avai
labi
lity o
f pro
cedu
res t
o sti
mul
ate t
he im
plem
enta
tion
of a
prog
ram
of
com
preh
ensiv
e adm
inist
ratio
n of
child
hood
dise
ases
by p
rovi
ding
the
finan
cial
and
hum
an re
sour
ces
Min
istry
of H
ealth
UN
RWA
Avai
labi
lity
of n
atio
nal p
olic
ies
on t
he h
ealth
of
adol
esce
nts
and
safe
ac
cess
to in
form
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of
mea
sure
s to
ens
ure
care
bef
ore
givi
ng b
irth
and
heal
th
educ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
APr
ivat
e Sec
tor
Avai
labi
lity
of p
olic
ies a
nd p
rogr
ams t
o so
lve
the
issue
of p
ollu
tion
and
its eff
ect o
n th
e hea
lth o
f the
child
, and
avai
labi
lity o
f mea
sure
s to
addr
ess
the e
nviro
nmen
tal h
azar
ds to
hea
lth
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Envi
ronm
ent Q
ualit
y Aut
horit
y
Avai
labi
lity o
f pro
cedu
res t
o en
cour
age h
ealth
y nut
ritio
nal p
ract
ices
and
prev
entio
n of
mal
nutr
ition
and
obes
ityM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of
pro
cedu
res
to p
reve
nt d
iarr
hea
and
diar
rhea
rel
ated
de
aths
, and
the i
nfec
tion
of w
orm
s and
par
asite
sM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth
66
Avai
labi
lity o
f mea
sure
s to
mai
ntai
n hi
gh ra
tes o
f vac
cina
tion
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Avai
labi
lity o
f mea
sure
s to e
ncou
rage
nat
ural
brea
stfee
ding
, and
adop
ting
proc
edur
es t
o co
mba
t th
e ne
gativ
e im
pact
of
wor
k on
bre
astfe
edin
g m
othe
rs
Min
istry
of H
ealth
PLC
Min
istry
of L
abou
rAv
aila
bilit
y of
mea
sure
s to
impr
ove
livin
g co
nditi
ons a
nd a
cces
s of l
ess
fort
unat
e gro
ups t
o he
alth
serv
ice
Min
istry
of H
ealth
UN
RWA
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsAv
aila
bilit
y of p
sych
olog
ical
assis
tanc
e for
child
ren
by ag
e, de
velo
pmen
tal
need
s, an
d te
nden
cy to
expo
se to
dan
ger
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
UN
RWA
Avai
labi
lity
of
reso
urce
s al
loca
ted
to
deve
lop
cons
ulta
tion
and
reha
bilit
atio
n se
rvic
es f
riend
ly t
o yo
ung
ado
lesc
ents
and
ava
ilabl
e w
ithou
t the
cons
ent o
f par
ents
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
UN
RWA
Avai
labi
lity
of m
easu
res
to r
educ
e m
orta
lity
due
to c
ance
r, di
abet
es,
Car
diov
ascu
lar d
iseas
e and
thei
r spr
ead
amon
gst t
he yo
ung
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Avai
labi
lity
of m
easu
res t
o im
prov
e nu
triti
onal
indi
cato
rs a
nd h
ealth
y lif
e sty
les a
mon
g chi
ldre
n an
d ad
oles
cent
sM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of m
easu
res t
o im
prov
e acc
ess t
o cl
ean,
safe
wat
er an
d se
wag
e co
nnec
ted
with
an o
ffici
al n
etw
ork
and
prot
ect c
hild
ren
from
pol
lutio
nW
ater
Aut
horit
yEn
viro
nmen
t Qua
lity A
utho
rity
Min
istry
of H
ealth
UN
RWA
Avai
labi
lity o
f rig
hts b
ased
hea
lth la
ws,
polic
es an
d pr
ogra
ms
Min
istry
of H
ealth
UN
RWA
PLC
Nat
iona
l C
ounc
il of
Hea
lth P
olic
y an
d St
rate
gic P
lann
ing
Avai
labi
lity o
f psy
chol
ogic
al as
sista
nce f
or ch
ildre
n by
age,
deve
lopm
enta
l ne
eds,
and
risk
of ex
posu
re to
dan
ger
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
UN
RWA
67Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Rig
ht in
Edu
catio
n (A
rtic
les 2
8, 2
9)Q
uant
itativ
e Ind
icat
ors
Sour
cePe
rcen
tage
of n
et an
d gr
oss e
nrol
lmen
t by s
tage
, sex
, are
a, so
cio-
econ
omic
sit
uatio
n an
d ty
pe (
liter
ary,
voca
tiona
l, sc
ienc
e), d
urin
g a
cert
ain
time
perio
d
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
Perc
enta
ge o
f poo
r and
disa
bled
child
ren
who
hav
e lea
rnin
g di
fficu
lties
, ch
ildre
n in
fect
ed w
ith c
hron
ic d
iseas
es a
nd e
nrol
led
in th
e ed
ucat
iona
l sy
stem
dur
ing
a ce
rtai
n tim
e pe
riod
by d
isabi
lity
type
, sex
, age
and
ge
ogra
phic
al d
istrib
utio
n
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthN
atio
nal C
entr
e for
Chr
onic
Dise
ases
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ool d
ropo
ut d
etai
led
by ca
uses
, age
, sex
, are
a, sta
ge, a
nd
soci
o-ec
onom
ic si
tuat
ion
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
Num
ber o
f qua
lified
uni
vers
ity te
achi
ng te
am a
nd th
eir d
istrib
utio
n by
pr
ofes
sion,
area
, and
type
of s
choo
lM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
Rat
io co
unse
lor/
stud
ent i
n ev
ery s
choo
l by a
rea,
type
of s
choo
l, and
stag
e du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
Num
ber o
f qua
lified
teac
hers
and
thei
r dist
ribut
ion
by st
age,
sex,
are
a, gr
ade a
nd le
vel o
f inc
ome d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Perc
enta
ge o
f sp
endi
ng o
n th
e ed
ucat
iona
l se
ctor
out
of
the
gene
ral
budg
et a
nd p
erce
ntag
e of
spen
ding
on
the
child
, mar
gina
lized
gro
ups,
and
univ
ersit
y edu
catio
n pe
r yea
r.
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of F
inan
ce
Perc
enta
ge o
f enr
ollm
ent i
n th
e sta
ge o
f ear
ly ch
ildho
od b
y are
a, se
x an
d so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPC
BSN
umbe
r of t
each
ers p
er st
uden
t by a
rea,
sex a
nd so
cio-
econ
omic
situ
atio
nM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n PC
BSN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts i
n a c
lassr
oom
(Rat
io o
f cla
ss d
ensit
y or c
onge
stion
) du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d by
type
of s
choo
l, ar
ea, s
tage
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
Num
ber
of l
icen
sed
and
unlic
ense
d sc
hool
s, vo
catio
nal
scho
ols
and
kind
erga
rten
s in
ever
y are
a by s
tate
, pop
ulat
ion,
sex,
etc.
durin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
PCBS
68
Num
ber o
f san
itary
uni
ts p
er st
uden
t by a
rea,
type
of s
choo
l, an
d sta
geM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth
Num
ber o
f stu
dent
s who
hav
e ac
cess
to c
ompu
ter a
nd sc
ienc
e la
bs a
nd
libra
ries d
urin
g a c
erta
in ti
me p
erio
d by
scho
ol ty
pe, a
rea,
sex,
stag
e and
tim
e
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Priv
ate s
ecto
rU
NRW
AN
umbe
r of
sch
ools
conn
ecte
d to
offi
cial
sew
age
netw
ork
and
the
avai
labi
lity o
f cle
an w
ater
dur
ing a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n M
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthW
ater
Aut
horit
yPC
BSN
umbe
r of
chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed o
f ac
cess
to
elec
tric
ity d
ue t
o Isr
aeli
mea
sure
s by a
rea,
stage
, etc
. dur
ing a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dU
N O
rgan
izat
ions
Inte
rnat
iona
l com
mun
ity in
stitu
tions
Stud
ents’
resu
lts in
the i
nter
natio
nal e
valu
atio
n ex
ams
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Perc
enta
ge o
f con
trib
utio
n by
civi
l soc
iety
and
priv
ate s
ecto
rsPC
BS –
Sur
veys
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Perc
enta
ge o
f rea
ding
and
writ
ing p
rofic
ienc
y by s
tage
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Perc
enta
ge o
f fai
lure
(Det
aile
d)M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPC
BSN
umbe
r of
stu
dies
on
the
wea
k ac
adem
ic a
ttai
nmen
t, ca
uses
, an
d m
onito
ring i
tM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n
Perc
enta
ge o
f les
sons
that
addr
ess t
he su
bjec
t of c
hild
ren’s
righ
ts in
ever
y su
bjec
t of t
he cu
rric
ulum
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
69Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Qua
litat
ive E
duca
tiona
l Ind
icat
ors
Sour
ceTa
king
mea
sure
s to
com
bat
disc
rimin
atio
n, m
ake
educ
atio
n a
safe
en
viro
nmen
t, co
mba
t vi
olen
ce a
nd d
evel
op th
e re
spec
t of
the
child
to
his e
nviro
nmen
t
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
UN
RWA
Priv
ate s
ecto
rAv
aila
ble
mea
sure
s to
enc
oura
ge t
he r
egul
ar a
tten
danc
e an
d pr
even
t sc
hool
dro
pout
, man
dato
ry an
d fre
e edu
catio
n, b
an p
hysic
al p
unish
men
tM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nU
NRW
ATa
king
mea
sure
s to
impr
ove
the
qual
ity o
f edu
catio
n in
the
rem
ote
and
poor
area
sPr
ovid
ing e
lect
ricity
, ven
tilat
ion,
ligh
t, fir
e exi
t and
med
ical
assis
tanc
e in
ever
y sch
ool/
area
Taki
ng m
easu
res t
o tr
ain
teac
hers
on
the r
ight
s of t
he ch
ild
Prov
idin
g nut
ritio
nal,
heal
th an
d co
unse
ling p
rogr
ams a
t sch
ools
Avai
labi
lity o
f nat
iona
l pol
icie
s and
stra
tegi
es b
ased
on
the r
ight
s
Avai
labi
lity
of m
easu
res t
o re
view
and
dev
elop
the
educ
atio
nal c
onte
nt
to in
corp
orat
e th
e rig
hts o
f the
chi
ld, n
on-d
iscrim
inat
ion
and
equa
lity,
and
base
it o
n cr
itica
l log
ical
thi
nkin
g, a
naly
sis, a
nd d
evel
opm
ent
of
child
’s ch
arac
ter
Avai
labi
lity o
f pro
gram
s tha
t tar
get t
alen
ted
and
gifte
d ch
ildre
n
Taki
ng m
easu
res t
o en
cour
age e
qual
opp
ortu
nity
70
Rig
hts o
f Chi
ldre
n w
ith D
isabi
lity
(Art
icle
23)
Qua
ntita
tive I
ndic
ator
sSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsR
ate o
f disa
bilit
y am
ong c
hild
ren
by ca
use,
age,
area
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n, sc
hool
enro
llmen
t, se
x, ag
e and
acce
ss to
bas
ic h
ealth
and
reha
bilit
atio
n se
rvic
es, e
tc. d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPC
BS -
Surv
eys
3 ye
ars
Num
ber o
f tre
atm
ent a
nd re
habi
litat
ion
cent
res t
hat a
re co
ncer
ned
with
child
ren
with
a di
sabi
lity,
deta
iled
by ty
pe o
f ins
titut
ion,
abso
rptio
n ca
paci
ty an
d ty
pe o
f disa
bilit
yM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of I
nter
ior
3-5
year
s
Num
ber o
f aw
aren
ess c
ampa
igns
that
targ
et th
e rig
hts o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y; p
reve
ntio
n,
and
early
det
ectio
n pe
r yea
rC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of Y
outh
and
Spor
tsM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nPa
lesti
ne B
road
casti
ng C
orpo
ratio
n
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of
syst
emat
ic a
nd u
nifie
d tr
aini
ng p
rogr
ams
that
tar
get
wor
kers
with
chi
ldre
n w
ith
disa
bilit
ies d
urin
g a ce
rtai
n tim
e per
iod
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsU
NRW
AM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
ns
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f spe
ndin
g on
disa
bilit
ies a
nd ch
ildre
n w
ith d
isabi
litie
s by t
ype o
f ser
vice
and
type
of
disa
bilit
y, an
d du
ring a
cert
ain
time p
erio
d by
all s
ervi
ce p
rovi
ders
, per
cent
age o
f sup
port
allo
cate
d fo
r the
disa
bilit
y sec
tor,
and
the p
erce
ntag
e allo
cate
d fo
r chi
ldre
n
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Fin
ance
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Ann
ual –
3
year
s(A
ccor
ding
to
plan
)
Num
ber/
perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity w
ho re
ceiv
e cas
h or
mat
eria
l ass
istan
ce an
d se
rvic
e de
taile
d by
area
, soc
io-e
cono
mic
situ
atio
n, ty
pe o
f disa
bilit
y, et
c.M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
UN
RWA
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Surv
eys
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f fam
ilies
that
hav
e ac
cess
to se
rvic
es fo
r chi
ldre
n w
ith a
disa
bilit
y, de
taile
d by
type
of
disa
bilit
y, ag
e, ar
ea, s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic si
tuat
ion,
educ
atio
nal l
evel
of p
aren
tsPC
BS -
Surv
eys
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs3
year
s
71Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Num
ber/
perc
enta
ge o
f pe
rson
nel
qual
ified
to
deal
with
chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
and
thei
r di
strib
utio
n an
d sp
ecia
lty co
mpa
red
to th
e num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsC
ivil
soci
ety i
nstit
utio
nsU
NRW
A
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity (
perc
enta
ge) e
nrol
led
in th
e edu
catio
nal s
yste
m (d
etai
led
by
stage
, age
, and
area
) dur
ing a
cert
ain
time p
erio
dM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Ann
ual
Perc
enta
ge o
f sch
ool
drop
out
s due
to d
isabi
lity b
y, ag
e, ar
ea, a
nd ca
use
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Ann
ual
Num
ber
of r
esou
rce
room
s, re
sour
ce c
entr
es a
nd c
ompa
cted
roo
ms
and
thei
r di
strib
utio
n,
abso
rptio
n ca
paci
ty an
d av
aila
bilit
y of q
ualifi
ed te
ams
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
3 ye
ars
Perc
enta
ge o
f poo
r and
disa
bled
child
ren
and
thei
r dist
ribut
ion,
and
per
cent
age o
f tho
se w
ho d
o no
t rec
eive
soci
al as
sista
nce
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsA
nnua
l
Perc
enta
ge o
f disa
bled
chi
ldre
n de
priv
ed fr
om e
duca
tion
and
hea
lth a
nd re
habi
litat
ion
serv
ices
w
ith li
sting
the c
ause
s, di
strib
utio
n, se
x and
age
PCBS
– S
urve
ysU
NRW
AO
CH
A
Ann
ual
Num
ber o
f pol
icie
s, pi
eces
of l
egisl
atio
n an
d pr
ogra
ms t
hat t
arge
t chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsPL
C3
year
s
Num
ber o
f pub
lic b
uild
ings
and
tran
spor
tatio
n eq
uipp
ed fo
r use
by
child
ren
with
disa
bilit
ies b
y ar
ea
Min
istry
of
Lo
cal
Gov
ernm
ent,
mun
icip
aliti
es3-
5 ye
ars
72
Qua
litat
ive I
ndic
ator
sSo
urce
Freq
uenc
yD
etai
lsAv
aila
bilit
y of
a b
ody
resp
onsib
le f
or d
isabi
litie
s an
d ch
ildre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity,
and
conc
erne
d in
usin
g sta
tistic
s to
deve
lop
prog
ram
s to
stren
gthe
n th
is gr
oup
and
prot
ectin
g it
from
neg
ativ
e im
pact
s
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsAv
aila
ble o
r U
nava
ilabl
eD
egre
e of
impl
emen
tatio
nEff
ectiv
enes
s an
d Q
ualit
y of
impl
emen
tatio
n
Avai
labi
lity
of p
roce
dure
s and
mea
sure
s to
ensu
re n
on-d
iscrim
inat
ion
and
prot
ect c
hild
ren
with
di
sabi
litie
s fro
m ex
ploi
tatio
n an
d ab
use
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irs
Avai
labi
lity o
f pro
cedu
res a
nd m
easu
res t
o ens
ure t
hat c
hild
ren
with
disa
bilit
y get
thei
r edu
catio
nal,
heal
th an
d so
cial
righ
tsM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
Min
istry
of H
ealth
Avai
labi
lity
of m
easu
res
to e
nsur
e th
e in
depe
nden
ce o
f ch
ildre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
and
thei
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in sp
ortiv
e, re
crea
tiona
l and
pla
nnin
g act
iviti
esM
inist
ry o
f Spo
rts a
nd Y
outh
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsAv
aila
bilit
y of
mea
sure
s to
equi
p th
e in
fras
truc
ture
, tra
nspo
rtat
ion
and
publ
ic b
uild
ings
for t
he
use o
f chi
ldre
n w
ith d
isabi
lity
Min
istry
of L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent
Min
istry
of T
rans
port
atio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of q
ualit
y com
mun
ity re
habi
litat
ion
prog
ram
sM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Civ
il so
ciet
y ins
titut
ions
Avai
labi
lity o
f a n
atio
nal r
egist
ry fo
r disa
bilit
y and
a sy
stem
to m
anag
e cas
esM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Avai
labi
lity o
f mea
sure
s to
redu
ce th
e neg
ativ
e cul
tura
l tre
nds a
nd p
ract
ices
agai
nst c
hild
ren
with
di
sabi
lity
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
nAv
aila
bilit
y of
mea
sure
s to
com
bat
disa
bilit
y an
d its
neg
ativ
e eff
ects
due
to
acci
dent
s, ch
roni
c di
seas
e, en
doga
my,
pove
rty,
mal
nutr
ition
, lac
k of
suffi
cien
t hea
lth ca
re d
urin
g pre
gnan
cy an
d aft
er
deliv
ery,
etc.
Min
istry
of S
ocia
l Affa
irsM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lth
Avai
labi
lity o
f mea
sure
s to
com
bat l
abou
r of c
hild
ren
with
disa
bilit
ies a
nd st
erili
zatio
n of
girl
sM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
Min
istry
of L
abou
rM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthAv
aila
bilit
y of a
com
plai
nt sy
stem
ICH
RAv
aila
bilit
y of m
easu
res t
o pr
even
t kill
ing c
hild
ren
with
disa
bilit
y at b
irth
and
prot
ect t
hem
from
ex
ploi
tatio
nM
inist
ry o
f Hea
lthM
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial A
ffairs
73Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Annex (2): List of invitees and participants* in the national and internal workshops
Name Institution EmailPalestinian Central Bureau of StatisticsJawad Al-Saleh*
Khalid Abu Khalid*Faten Abu Qare’*
Protection GroupMa’moun Al-Oda Ministry of Labour [email protected] Kawther Al-Mughrabi* Ministry of Social Affairs [email protected] Khalid Al-Barghouthi Ministry of Social Affairs - PovertyRaed Nazzal* Ministry of Social Affairs [email protected] May Abdel Hadi* Ministry of Social Affairs - Orphans [email protected] Khalil Tannous* Ministry of Social Affairs [email protected] Ameen Independent Commission for the
Human [email protected]
Khalid Sabateen Police [email protected] Wafaa’ Mu’amar Police [email protected]
Nahid Freitekh Palestine Legislative Council [email protected] Farid Al-Jallad Higher Judicial Council [email protected] Rifat Kassis/Ayed Abu Qteish Children Defense International [email protected] Fadwa Al-Shae’r* Ministry of Interior [email protected] Sawsan Azzam Ministry of Interior [email protected] Daraghmeh* Ministry of InteriorLiali Siam* Ministry of Interior [email protected]
UNRWA
Disability GroupHanaa’ Al-Qaimary* Ministry of Social Affairs - Disability [email protected] Sonya Helou* Ministry of Social Affairs [email protected] Ziad Amro* Ministry of Social Affairs Shifa Shakha Ministry of Education [email protected]
Higher Council of Disability Rebal* General Union of the Handicapped [email protected]
UNRWAAllam Jarrar Medical Relief Society [email protected] Rabah Jabr Red Crescent [email protected]
Participation GroupEman Odeh Ministry of Culture [email protected]
Mohammad Daraghmeh* Ministry of Culture [email protected]
Waleed Mousa Youth and Sports [email protected] Husseini Nayzak Foundation [email protected]
74
Hania Al-Bitar Pyalara [email protected] Elham Abdel Qadir Ministry of Education [email protected] Rasha Suleiman Ministry of Local Government [email protected]
MAAN [email protected] Issa Rabadi MAAN [email protected]
Tamer Foundation [email protected] Nazek Anabtawi* Red Crescent [email protected]
Qattan Foundation [email protected]
Education GroupReema Kilani Ministry of Education [email protected] Saadeh Hammoudeh Ministry of Education [email protected] Amal Hammad* Ministry of Education [email protected] Munjid Suleiman* Ministry of Education [email protected] Muhannad Beidas UNRWA [email protected]
UNESCOUNICEFTamer Foundation [email protected] Qattan Foundation [email protected] Early Childhood resources centRE [email protected]
Health GroupDr. Waleed Al-Khatib* Ministry of Health [email protected] Dr. Jawad Al-Bitar* Ministry of Health [email protected] Dr. Qasem Maani Ministry of Health – Planning [email protected] Ilham Shamasna* Ministry of Health [email protected] Hijaz* Ministry of Health [email protected] Rayyan* Ministry of Health [email protected] Alaa’ Abu Al-Rub* Ministry of Health [email protected] Lina Bahar* Ministry of Health [email protected] Dr. Khalida Jarrar* Ministry of Health [email protected] Majeda Al-Saidi Ministry of HealthTaghreed Yasin Ministry of HealthJamila Dababneh Ministry of HealthRita Giacman Bir Zeit University – Public Health
Dr. Samia Halileh Bir Zeit University – Public Health Institute
Dr. Ummaya Khammash UNRWA [email protected] Dr. Bassam Madi* UNRWA [email protected]. Najwa Rizkallah UNICEF [email protected]
World Health OrganizationRami Habash Medical Relief Society [email protected] Anwar Dwekat Red Crescent [email protected] Sandouka Juzoor [email protected] Jennifer Dabis* Juzoor [email protected]
75Indicators of the Rights of the Palestinian Child
Ibrahim Lada’ah Medical Work Committees [email protected] Union of Health Care Committees [email protected]
GeneralMirna Jabr* Ministry of Planning and
Administrative [email protected]
Salwa Massad Bir Zeit University [email protected] Salam Kanaan Save the Children
76