Upload
loraine-mae-ramos-asuncion
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 1/18
JUDICIALBRANCH OFINDIAReporters:
RAMSEY L. CABALLO
CRESCENTE D. ACUÑA II
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 2/18
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 3/18
TRANSFER PETITIONS… The Supreme Court has the power to
transfer the cases from one High Court to
another and even from one District Courtof a particular state to another DistrictCourt of the other state.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 4/18
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE Judges are generally appointed on the
basis of seniority and not on political
preference.A Judge of the Supreme Court cannot be
removed from office except by an orderof the President.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 5/18
POWER TO PUNISH CONTEMPT
Supreme Court has been vested withpower to punish anyone for contempt of
any law court in India including itself.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 6/18
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
The Constitution of India is not fullyapplicable to the state of J&K. This is the
effect of Article 370. The Constitution of India is applicable to
the state of J&K with various modificationsand exceptions.
Jammu and Kashmir, unlike the otherIndian states, also has its own Constitution.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 7/18
Landmark judgments:Judiciary-Executive
confrontations
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 8/18
Land reform (early confrontation) The Parliament of India passed the First
Amendment to the Constitution in 1951followed by the Fourth Amendment in
1955 to protect its authority to implementland redistribution.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 9/18
Other laws deemed unconstitutional
On 1 February 1970, the Supreme Courtinvalidated the government-sponsoredBank Nationalization Bill that had beenpassed by Parliament in August 1969.
The Supreme Court also rejected asunconstitutional a presidential order of 7September 1970, that abolished the titles,
privileges, and privy purses of the formerrulers of India's old princely states.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 10/18
Response from Parliament
In reaction to the decisions of the SupremeCourt, in 1971 the Parliament of India passedan amendment empowering itself to amendany provision of the constitution, including the
fundamental rights. The Parliament of India passed the 25th
Amendment, making legislative decisionsconcerning proper land compensation non- justiciable.
The Parliament of India passed anamendment to the Constitution of India,which added a constitutional articleabolishing princely privileges and privy purses.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 11/18
Counter-response from theSupreme Court
On 24 April 1973, the Supreme Courtresponded to the parliamentary offensive
by ruling in Kesavananda Bharati v. TheState of Kerala that although theseamendments were constitutional, thecourt still reserved for itself the discretionto reject any constitutional amendments
passed by Parliament by declaring thatthe amendments cannot change theconstitution's "basic structure“.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 12/18
Emergency and Government
of India The independence of judiciary was severelycurtailed on account of powerful centralgovernment ruled by Indian NationalCongress. This was during the Indian
Emergency (1975-1977) of Indira Gandhi.(under the declaration of emergency) no
person has any locus to move any writ petitionunder Art. 226 before a High Court for habeas
corpus or any other writ or order or direction tochallenge the legality of an order of detention.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 13/18
Post-1980: an assertive
Supreme Court The Supreme Court's creative and expansiveinterpretations of Article 21 (Life and PersonalLiberty), primarily after the Emergency period,have given rise to a new jurisprudence of
public interest litigation that has vigorouslypromoted many important economic andsocial rights.
Civil and political rights (traditionally
protected in the Fundamental Rights chapterof the Indian Constitution) have also beenexpanded and more fiercely protected.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 14/18
Corruption and misconduct of judges
The year 2008 has seen the SupremeCourt in one controversy after another,from serious allegations of corruption at
the highest level of the judiciary,expensive private holidays at the taxpayers expense, refusal to divulge detailsof judges' assets to the public secrecy inthe appointments of judges, to even
refusal to make information public underthe Right to Information Act.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 15/18
HIGH COURTS
India's unitary judicial system is made upof the Supreme Court of India at thenational level, for the entire country andthe 21 High Courts at the State level.
These courts have jurisdiction over a state,a union territory or a group of states andunion territories.
The High Courts are the principal civil
courts of original jurisdiction in the statealong with District Courts which aresubordinate to the High courts.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 16/18
District Courts of India The District Courts of India are the courts
established by the State Government forevery district or for one or more districtstogether taking into account the number
of cases, population distribution in thedistrict.
These courts are under administrativecontrol of the High Court of the State towhich the district concerned belongs.
The decisions of District court is subject tothe appellate jurisdiction of the Highcourt.
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 17/18
Composition of District courts
8/14/2019 INDIAN JUDICIARY REPORT.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-judiciary-reportpptx 18/18
Jurisdiction The District Court or Additional District
court exercises jurisdiction both on originaland appellate side in civil and criminalmatters arising in the District.
The territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction incivil matters is usually set in concernedstate enactments on the subject of civilcourts.
On the criminal side jurisdiction is almostexclusively derived from code of criminalprocedure.