Upload
niesha
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Value Creators Report India Supplement. INDIA STORY: FUNDAMENTALS DRIVEN VALUE CREATION “ Manufacturing leads the charge” April 23, 2007. PREFACE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
INDIA STORY: FUNDAMENTALS DRIVEN VALUE CREATION
“Manufacturing leads the charge”
April 23, 2007
Value Creators Report
India Supplement
PREFACE
This document has been prepared as a supplement to BCG’s global value creators report 2006 (“Spotlight on Growth”) and provides further insights into the value creation by Indian companies over and above what is highlighted in the global report.
The methodology for analyzing a larger set of Indian companies is the same as that for the global set. Please refer to the section on methodology for a detailed explanation on TSR decomposition analysis and selection of sample.
Total shareholder returns (TSR) analysis for a sample of Indian companies has been conducted for the period Apr ’02 – Mar ’07 and top performers have been identified. In order to make a like-to-like comparison of Indian companies with relevant international set, Apr ‘01 – Mar ‘06 financials of Indian companies are used. Further, published financials of Indian companies as on Mar ’06 are used to decompose the share holder returns from 01-06 into sub-components (growth, profitability, multiple change, etc).
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
0
150
300
450
600
750
Mar
-01
Jun-
01
Sep-
01
Dec
-01
Mar
-02
Jun-
02
Sep-
02
Dec
-02
Mar
-03
Jun-
03
Sep-
03
Dec
-03
Mar
-04
Jun-
04
Sep-
04
Dec
-04
Mar
-05
Jun-
05
Sep-
05
Dec
-05
Mar
-06
Jun-
06
Sep-
06
Dec
-06
Mar
-07
NIFTY NSE 500 MIDCAP
4%-3%
INDIAN STOCK MARKETS HAVE TAKEN OFF SINCE 2003Mid Cap Stocks Have Led The Rally
74%60%50%
CAGR
-6%
Source: Capitalline
INDIAN MARKETS HAVE OUTPERFORMED MANY GLOBAL INDICES
41%37%
28%21% 20% 19%
12%8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
RTS Merval Nifty WIG-20 All Share SSE IBEX-35 NYSEComposite
Russia
37%
35%
Argentina
21%
17%
India
29%
12%
Poland
26%
23%
S. Africa
37%
34%
China
30%
194%
Spain
22%
24%
USA
12%
21%
Country
3 yr
1 yr
Source: Capitaline, Factiva (Tradeline), Yahoo Finance, BCG Analysis
5 year performance (%)
2002-07 returns of select global indices
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
~20 TIMES SHAREHOLDER RETURN IN INDIA COMPARED TO GLOBAL AVERAGE
Source: Capitaline, Factiva (Tradeline), Yahoo Finance, BCG Analysis
2%
40%38%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
India sample (N=191)'02 - '07
India sample (N=200)'01 - '06
Global sample(N=1056) '01 - '06
%
Shareholder return
X 17-20
PROFITABLE GROWTH AND MULTIPLE RE-RATING PRIMARY LEVERS OF HIGHER TSR IN INDIAN SAMPLE
No Dip In Profitability Despite Much Higher Growth
Source: Capitaline, Factiva (Tradeline), Yahoo Finance, BCG Analysis
TSR decomposition of overall sample (2001-06)
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
% contribution
India (N=200)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Global Sample (N=1056)
2%
1%
2%
0%
-4%
1%
4%
-2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
TOP DECILE RELIED ON FUNDAMENTAL BUSINESS DRIVERSAND DEBT REDUCTION
Sales Growth 50% Faster, Margin improvement at Above 10% pa
TSR decomposition of overall sample
Source: Capitaline, BCG Analysis
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
-2%
0% 50% 100% 150%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
% contribution
Overall Sample
Contributing factors
% contribution
Top Decile (n=20)
27%
13%
6%
38%
5%
4%
24%
116%
0% 50% 100% 150%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies• Industry sectors• Ownership types• Large caps Vs mid caps
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
Industry
Engineering & Construction
Industrial Manufacturing
Materials & Commodities
Automotive & Supply
Telecom
Transportation & Logistics
Chemicals & Plastics
Oil & Gas
Pharma, Biotech & Healthcare
IT
FMCG, Retail & Durables
Others
Total
Number of companies in top 20’01-’06 ’02-’07
Large cap Mid cap Large cap Mid cap
OLD ECONOMY HAS DOMINATED VALUE CREATION (I) Four Industries Account For ~70% Of Top Performers
4
6
4
2
-
-
1
-
1
-
-
2
20
2
1
3
5
-
-
1
-
3
-
-
5
20
3
3
5
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
3
2
20
8
3
5
-
-
-
2
-
1
-
-
1
20
Industry(1) 1. Engineering & Construction
2. Industrial Manufacturing
3. Materials & Commodities
4. Telecom
5. Chemicals & Plastics
6. Automotive & Supply
7. Transportation & Logistics
8. Oil & Gas
9. Pharmaceuticals, Biotech & Healthcare
10. IT
11. FMCG, Retail & Durables
TSR (%)’02-’07(1)
81%
72%
57%
51%
47%
46%
43%
34%
28%
26%
18%
(1) 10 Large Cap and 15 Mid Cap companies classified as ‘Others not included’Source: Capitaline, BCG analysis
TSR (%)’01-’06
64%
67%
65%
47%
54%
63%
62%
43%
33%
23%
20%
OLD ECONOMY HAS DOMINATED VALUE CREATION (II)
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 18002007 Market Cap (‘000 Cr)
(XX) – Total Value Created (‘000 Cr)(1)(1)Total Value Created = Change in total market cap + Total dividend paid outiSource: Capitaline, BCG Analysis
5 year TSR and 2006 market cap of top value creating industry segments
OLD ECONOMY HAS DOMINATED VALUE CREATION (III)
Engineering & Construction (109) Industrial Manufacturing (137)Materials & Commodities (248)
Telecom (148)Chemicals & Plastics (50)Automotive & Supply (116)
Transport & Logistics (19)Oil & Gas (231)Pharma, Biotech & Healthcare (95)
IT (186)FMCG, Retail & Durables (97)
Industrial Manufacturing
Materials & Commodities
Engineering & Construction
Automotive & Supply
Transportation & Logistics
Chemicals & Plastics
Telecom
Oil & Gas
Pharma
IT
FMCG & Durables
Overall
Dividend yield %
7
16
8
9
7
8
2
3
1
-3
0
5
TOP TSR INDUSTRIES SHOWED SUBSTANTIAL PROFITABILITY IMPROVEMENT SUPPLEMENTING ABOVE AVERAGE GROWTH
TSR % Revenue %
EBITDA % Multiple % Allocation term
Value creation = Fundamental value + Valuation
multiple + Cash Flow attribution
67
65
64
63
62
54
47
43
33
23
20
40
19
21
22
23
5
15
12
14
18
33
11
17
9
7
-1
7
9
0
-6
2
2
-6
-1
2
25
2
22
14
19
11
35
14
12
-2
7
10
MV / EV %
6
14
10
8
12
16
4
9
0
0
0
5
Share change %
3
1
1
2
-2
0
1
5
2
2
1
2
3
4
5
4
8
4
1
6
2
1
3
3
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURINGStrong Fundamentals Backed By Multiple Re-rating
TSR decomposition of Industrial Manufacturing
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Industrial Manufacturing (India)
19%
9%
25%
6%
3%
7%
67%
-3%
0% 50% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
Machinery & Construction (Global top 10)
% contribution
14%
7%
7%
3%
0%
37%
8%
-2%
0% 50% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
4%
0%
-8%
0%
-2%
1%
-1%
-6%
Global Avg
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth, BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
MATERIALS & COMMODITIESTop Performer Driven Purely By Fundamentals
TSR decomposition of Materials & Commodities
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Materials & Commodities (India)
21%
14%
4%
16%
64%
7%
2%
-1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
Materials & Mining (Global top 10)
% contribution
32%
7%
12%
0%
58%
9%
-1%
-1%
0% 50% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
8%
5%
-2%
6%
-2%
4%
0%
19%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONRiding the Infrastructure and Real Estate Wave
TSR decomposition of Engineering & Construction
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Engineering & Construction (India)
22%
10%
5%
8%
64%
-1%
22%
-2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
Machinery & Construction (Global top 10)
% contribution
14%
7%
7%
3%
0%
37%
8%
-2%
0% 50% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
4%
0%
-8%
0%
-2%
1%
-1%
-6%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
AUTOMOTIVE AND SUPPLYBeating the World’s Best on Sales Growth and Profitability Improvement
TSR decomposition of Automotive and Supply industry
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Contributing factors
Automotive & supply (India)
% contribution
Contributing factors
Automotive & supply (Global top 10)
% contribution
23%
7%
14%
8%
4%
9%
63%
-2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
15%
0%
13%
20%
6%
0%
51%
-3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Global Avg
4%
-1%
5%
1%
-3%
3%
0%
9%
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICSStrong Performance Driven by Change In Expectations and Profitability Improvement
TSR decomposition of Transportation & Logistics
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Transportation & Logistics (India)Contributing factors
Transportation & Logistics (Global top 10)
% contribution
12%
8%
7%
62%
5%
9%
19%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
10%
8%
14%
0%
34%
3%
0%
-1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
6%
1%
0%
4%
0%
1%
0%
12%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
CHEMICALS & PLASTICSAverage, Balanced Fundamental Performance Combined with Capital Structure Changes
TSR decomposition of Chemicals & Plastics
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Chemicals & Plastics (India)Contributing factors
Chemicals (Global top 10)
% contribution
15%
0%
11%
16%
4%
8%
54%
0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
10%
2%
8%
7%
4%
0%
31%
0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
8%
-2%
-1%
3%
-1%
3%
-1%
9%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
TELECOMWeak Fundamental Performance, TSR Driven by Significant Multiple Re-rating
TSR decomposition of Telecom
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Telecom (India)
12%
4%
1%
2%
47%
-6%
35%
-1%
0% 20% 40%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
OIL & GASBroadly Representative of Overall Market, Slightly Slower Revenue Growth
TSR decomposition of Oil & Gas
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Oil & Gas (India)
14%
9%
6%
3%
43%
2%
14%
-5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
PHARMACEUTICALS, BIOTECH & HEALTHCAREBroadly Representative of Overall Market, Slower Growth Than Global Top 10
TSR decomposition of Pharmaceuticals, Biotech & Healthcare
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
Pharma, Biotech & HC (India)Contributing factors
Pharma & Biotech (Global top 10)
% contribution
18%
0%
2%
1%
33%
2%
12%
-2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
22%
5%
0%
2%
22%
1%
-5%
-3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
8%
2%
-12%
0%
-1%
1%
0%
-2%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
ITStrong Revenue Growth but Margin Erosion and Downward Multiple Re-rating
TSR decomposition of IT
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
IT (India)
33%
0%
1%
23%
-4%
-6%
-2%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
Technology (Global top 10)
% contribution
12%
18%
7%
1%
0%
34%
-3%
-1%
0% 50% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
4%
0%
-8%
0%
-2%
1%
-1%
-6%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
Contributing factors
% contribution
FMCG, RETAIL & DURABLESWeak Performance Across Parameters, Global Top 10 Outperformed Indian Sample
TSR decomposition of FMCG, Retail & Durables
Contributing factors
Overall
% contribution
FMCG & Durables (India)Contributing factors
Consumer Goods (Global top 10)
% contribution
11%
0%
3%
-1%
20%
-1%
7%
1%
0% 20% 40%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
7%
3%
15%
3%
4%
30%
-1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
4%
1%
-2%
0%
0%
3%
-1%
5%
Global Avg
17%
2%
10%
5%
3%
5%
40%
2%
0% 25% 50%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG report – Spotlight on Growth,BCG Analysis
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies• Industry sectors• Ownership types• Large caps Vs mid caps
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
INDIAN COMPANIES HAVE OUTPERFORMED MNC’s PSUs outperformed private sector in FY2001-06
37%
56%
42%38%
18%21%
2002-07 2001-06
MNC
PSU Pvt
MNC
PSU
Pvt
(1) (1) (2)
(2)
(3) (3)
(1) PSU’s - N=21 for 2001-06 and N=20 for 2002-07(2) Pvt - N = 157 for 2001-06 and N=151 for 2002-07(3) MNC’s - N=21 for 2001-06 and N=19 for 2002-07Source: BCG Analysis
TSR by ownership type (2002-07 and 2001-06)
PSU’s HAVE OUTPERFORMED MNC’s AND PRIVATE SECTOR2001-2006
8%
2%
8%
0%
3%
1%
21%
-1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
% contribution
MNC
Contributing factors
PSU
12%
16%
12%
6%
9%
56%
3%
-1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
23%
7%
4%
2%
5%
38%
-1%
-2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
% contribution % contribution
Private Sector
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
PSU TSR DRIVEN BY MULTIPLE CHANGE AND CASH FLOW EFFECTS Fundamental Performance Key Drivers Of Private Sector And MNC TSR
31%
67%50%
34%
21%40%
35%
12% 10%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
PSU Private sector MNC
% of TSR
TSR composition of PSUs v/s Private sector v/s MNCs
56% 21%
21 21
5-year TSR (’01-’06)
No. of companies in sample
Cash flow effect (debt, dividend, shares)
Expectations (multiple)
Business fundamentals (sales, margin)
37%
158
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
72% OF TOTAL VALUE CREATED COMES FROM PRIVATE COMPANIES
5 year TSR and 2007 market cap of MNCs, PSUs and Private companies%TSR
(1)Total Value Created = Change in total market cap + Total dividend paid outiSource: Capitaline, BCG Analysis
2007 Market Cap (‘000 Cr)
(XX) – Total Value Created (‘000 Cr)(1)
MNC (76)
PSU (397)
Pvt Cos. (1228)
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies• Industry sectors• Ownership types• Large caps Vs mid caps
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
MID CAPS DELIVERED HIGHER TSR THAN LARGE CAPS‘02- ‘07 and ‘01- ‘06
37%
46%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
88%
135%
37%
51%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
Absolute TSR ( 2002-07) TSR of Top 20 ( 2002-07)
Absolute TSR (2001-06) TSR of Top 20 ( 2001-06)
82%
107%
(1)
(2)
(1) Large Caps N=76, Min-Cap N=115(2) Large Caps N=68, Mid-Cap N=132Source: BCG Analysis
MID-CAPS TOOK A PROFITABILITY DIP AND RELIED MORE ON MULTIPLE RE-RATING
2001-06TSR decomposition of overall sample
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
17%
3%
8%
4%
3%
3%
37%
-1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Contributing factors
% contribution
Large Cap ( Market Cap > $ 1 bn)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Mid Cap ( Market Cap < $ 1 bn)
18%
17%
9%
3%
9%
51%
-2%
-3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
LARGE CAP TSR DRIVEN MORE BY FUNDAMENTAL PERFORMANCEMultiple Change More Important In Mid-caps
51%31%
22%
33%
27%35%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Large caps Mid-caps
% of TSR
TSR composition of large caps v/s mid-caps (2001-06)
37% 51%
68 132
5-year TSR (’01-’06)
No. of companies in sample
Cash flow effect (debt, dividend, shares)
Expectations (multiple)
Business fundamentals (sales, margin)
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
TOPPERS IN LARGE CAP RELIED EVEN MORE ON FUNDAMENTALS, LESS ON MULTIPLE CHANGE
TSR decomposition of overall sample (2001-06)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Large Cap (n=68)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Large Cap Top 20 (n=20)
24%
11%
6%
19%
4%
19%
82%
0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
17%
3%
8%
4%
3%
3%
37%
-1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
TOPPERS IN MID CAP RELIED EVEN MORE ON MULTIPLE CHANGE
TSR decomposition of overall sample (2001-06)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Mid Cap (n=132)
Contributing factors
% contribution
Mid Cap Top 20 (n=20)
18%
7%
29%
30%
5%
20%
107%
-3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
18%
17%
9%
3%
9%
51%
-2%
-3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Revenue
EBITDA
Multiple
MV/EV
NOSH
DY
AllocationTerm
TSR
Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
40
27
-30
-3
7
34
-1
47
0
28
8
10
32
37
35
23
40
14
11
4
75
16
4
5
-10
0
35
0
0
-11
12
0
-55
-3
-1
-2
FOR THE BEST PERFORMING LARGE CAP COS, PROFITABILITY AND TOP-LINE GROWTH ARE KEY DRIVERS OF VALUE
2001-06Value
creation = Fundamental value + Valuation multiple + Cash Flow attribution
Bajaj Hindustan
Bharat EarthMove
JSW Steel
Sesa Goa
Crompton Greaves
Gammon India
Sterlite Inds.
Bharat Electron
United Phosp.
Bharat Forge
Large Cap
Overall
145
140
131
125
116
111
106
97
95
94
37
40
37
10
39
40
27
32
35
17
48
45
17
17
15
22
13
30
13
15
19
9
17
-7
3
2
6
5
2
8
3
2
5
3
1
1
3
3
39
38
37
27
27
25
25
17
10
15
3
5
Dividend yield %TSR % Revenue
%EBITDA % Multiple % Allocation
termMV / EV % Share
change %
Note: Financials as on Mar 06Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
-5
-3
-1
-15
-23
0
0
-4
0
-6
-3
-2
56
46
23
22
38
27
27
29
74
56
17
10
Praj Inds.
Aban Offshore Lt
Balkrishna Inds.
Peninsula Land
Nag. Constructn.
Unitech
Kalpataru Power
Lupin
Guj. Flourochem.
Hind.Construct.
Mid
Overall
206
176
167
165
161
151
146
142
137
134
51
40
31
26
41
102
53
28
26
65
-1
31
9
5
FOR THE BEST PERFORMING MID CAP COS, MULTIPLE CHANGE IS A MAJOR DRIVER OF VALUE
2001-06Value
creation = Fundamental value + Valuation multiple + Cash Flow attribution
46
42
32
-2
49
39
40
15
19
36
18
17
5
7
16
25
2
7
6
0
12
-15
-2
2
5
7
1
0
0
9
9
5
7
9
3
3
67
52
54
32
42
41
38
32
25
22
9
5
Dividend yield %TSR % Revenue
%EBITDA % Multiple % Allocation
termMV / EV % Share
change %
Note: Financials as on Mar 06Source: Capitaline, Company Financials 01-06, BCG Analysis
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
86% OF TOTAL VALUE CREATED COMES FROM LARGE CAP SEGMENT
5 year TSR and 2007 market cap of large and small cap segments
(XX) – Total Value Created (‘000 Cr)(1)(1)Total Value Created = Change in total market cap + Total dividend paid outiSource: Capitaline, BCG Analysis
2007 Market Cap (‘000 Cr)
Mid Cap (237)
Large Cap (1463)
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
7 INDIAN COMPANIES IN GLOBAL TOP 10 VALUE CREATORS IN THEIR RESPECTIVE SECTORS
Larsen & Toubro
Bajaj Auto
Bharat Heavy Electricals
Mahindra & Mahindra
Tata Motors
Hero Honda Motors
Indian Hotels
CompanyEngineering & Construction
Automotive & Supply
Engineering & Construction
Automotive & Supply
Automotive & Supply
Automotive & Supply
Travel & Tourism
Sector70%
57%
56%
52%
50%
45%
36%
TSR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Company
1. Unitech2. JSW Steel3. Aban Offshore 4. Godrej Industries5. Sesa Goa6. Pantaloon Retail7. United Phosporous8. Videocon Industries9. Jindal Steel10. Thermax11. Glenmark Pharma12. S A I L13. Crompton Greaves14. Siemens15. Larsen & Toubro16. Bharti Airtel17. Century Textiles18. United Spirits19. Hindustan Zinc20. Aditya Birla Nuvo
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
31,4498,0847,4744,7106,7055,5266,0879,8907,3234,5607,338
47,2107,315
18,38945,663
144,8265,0767,863
23,8039,992
TSR (02-07)
257%197%173%146%140%121%114%103%101%
95%92%92%88%86%86%82%78%78%76%75%
Industry
Engineering & ConstructionMaterials & CommoditiesEngineering & ConstructionChemicals & PlasticsMaterials & CommoditiesFMCG, Retail & DurablesChemicals & PlasticsFMCG, Retail & DurablesMaterials & CommoditiesIndustrial ManufacturingPharma, Biotech & HealthcareMaterials & CommoditiesIndustrial ManufacturingIndustrial ManufacturingEngineering & ConstructionTelecomOthersFMCG, Retail & DurablesMaterials & CommoditiesOthers
TOP 20 TSR COMPANIES IN LARGE CAP SEGMENTSample of 76 companies
TOP 20 TSR COMPANIES IN MID-CAP SEGMENTSample of 115 companies
Company
1. Praj Industries.2. Shree Precoated Steels3. Ansal Properties4. Kalpataru Power5. Simplex Infrastructure6. Gujarat Flourochem7. Nagarjuna Construction8. Jai Corp9. Greaves Cotton10. Peninsula Land11. IVRCL Infrastructure12. Sintex Industries13. Lakshmi Mach. Works14. Jubilant Organosys15. Bajaj Hindustan16. Jyoti Structures17. Bhushan Steel18. Rajesh Exports19. Mahindra Gesco20. Maharashtra Seamless
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
3,1752,5053,0382,8851,5533,2443,3341,9641,5431,5403,7782,3523,6903,7342,7571,3752,1811,3882,1063,575
TSR (02-07)
224%206%192%162%143%140%135%134%133%125%120%116%115%112%109%106%102%101%
98%93%
Industry
Industrial ManufacturingMaterials & CommoditiesEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & ConstructionChemicals & PlasticsEngineering & ConstructionMaterials & CommoditiesIndustrial ManufacturingEngineering & ConstructionEngineering & ConstructionChemicals & PlasticsIndustrial ManufacturingPharma, Biotech & HealthcareMaterials & CommoditiesEngineering & ConstructionMaterials & CommoditiesOthersEngineering & ConstructionMaterials & Commodities
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
1 2 3 4
3,365 3,1272,366 2,053
238
761
313
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Cos listed on NSEon March 31, 2006
Top 300 by marketcap
Cos listed onMarch 31, 2001
Excluding bankingand financialservices firms
Market cap of excluded cosMarket cap represented
SAMPLE STUDIED CONSISTS OF 191 COMPANIES AND REPRESENTS 61% OF TOTAL MARKET CAP
Rs ‘000 cr Market capitalization by sample
Note: Sample excludes firms with non-comparable valuation paradigms, TSR Breakdown analysis done on similar screening for companies with published financialsSource: Capitaline
Final Sample
No. of Cos. 1068 300 218 191
Filter
1 2 3 4
2,814 2,6362,004 1,741
178
632
253
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Cos listed on NSEon March 31, 2006
Top 300 by marketcap
Cos listed onMarch 31, 2001
Excluding bankingand financialservices firms
Market cap of excluded cosMarket cap represented
INDUSTRY-WISE TSR DECOMPOSITION WAS CONDUCTED FOR FY01-06 RESULTS OF 200 COMPANIES BASED ON SIMILAR SCREENING
Represents 62% Of Total Market Cap
Rs ‘000 cr Market capitalization by sample
Note: Sample excludes firms with non-comparable valuation paradigmsSource: Capitaline
Final Sample for industry-wise TSR decomposition
No. of Cos. 918 300 226 199
Filter
SHARE PRICE CAN BE BROKEN INTO FIVE COMPONENTS
Share price = MVNOSH
=MVEV
EV
NOSH
x
(EBITDA) x (EBITDA multiple) x MVEV
NOSH=
(Sales x EBITDA margin) x (EBITDA multiple) x x MVEV
1NOSH
1 2 3 4 5
=Share price
=Share price S x M x m x F x 1N
Methodology
MV : Market value of companyNOSH : Number of shares outstandingEV : Enterprise value S : Sales
M : EBITDA Margin
m : EBITDA multiple
F : MV/EV
TOTAL SHARE HOLDER RETURN CAN BE BROKEN INTO SIX COMPONENTS
Methodology
Total shareholder return (TSR) =SP2
SP1
DividendSP1
– 1
=S2M2m2F2
S1M1m1F1
N1
N2
x + DY – 1
+ DY – 1S2
S1( ) M2
M1( ) m2
m1( ) F2
F1( ) N2
N1( )–1
=
= MM( )1 +
SS( )1 +
mm( )1 +
FF( )1 +
NN( )1 + + DY – 1
–1
SCAGR + MCAGR + FCAGR+ mCAGR – NCAGR + DY + allocation termTotal shareholder return (TSR) =
SP2 = Share price at end of yearSP1 = Share price at beginning of yearDividend = Dividend during the year
TOTAL SHARE HOLDER RETURN CAN BE STUDIED IN THREE SEGMENTS
Total shareholder return (TSR)
Sales + EBITDA margin + EBITDA multiple + – + DY + Allocation term= MVEV
No. ofshares( ))
Fundamental value Multiple Cash flow effect
Methodology
(
1 2 3
Growth in sales
Growth in EBITDA margin
Growth in EBITDA multiple
Growth in MV/EV ratio(1)
Growth in no. of shares
Dividend Yield+ + + - +
(1) MV/EV ratio represents the market value creation as proportion of total enterprise value - highlights the extent of debt taken by the company in relation to its market value
=
COMPANIES DIVIDED INTO 12 INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
Automotive & SupplyChemicals & PlasticsIndustrial ManufacturingFMCG, Retail & DurablesITEngineering & ConstructionMaterials & CommoditiesOil & GasOthers(1) Pharmaceuticals, Biotech & HealthcareTelecomTransportation & LogisticsOverall
Segment8577531261083276
Large CapMarket Cap >
$ 1 bn9
1411108
12191
151411
115
Mid CapMarket Cap <
$ 1 bn171918171315317
252243
191
Total
Number of companies
(1) Others includes the segments for which the number of players was unrepresentative of industry: 4 multi-businesses, 1 jewellery maker, 1 paper mfg,, 1 networks provider, 1 design and eng. company, Textile companies etcSource: Capitaline, BCG analysis
Companies representing 70% of
the world's total market capitalization
Number of selected
companies
Number of companies
included in the analysis
3,562
1,056
# of companiesin sample
Selection criteria (I): • Company could be
classified into one of
14 industry sectors• Listed for at least 5
years
(1) Hurdle rates differ across industriesSources: BCG Value Creators Report "Spotlight on growth", 2006; BCG analysis
4,924
Focus on: • 120 sub-industry
segments (excl. service firms, banks and insurances)
• Capital markets in 45 countries
Selection criteria (II): • Meets minimum
market capitalization(1)
• Free float above 25%• Satisfied company
accounts data availability
WORLDWIDE MORE THAN 1,000 COMPANIES ANALYZED Selection Process
TOTAL WORLDWIDE SAMPLE DISTRIBUTED TO REFLECT EACH INDUSTRY APPROPRIATELY
Companies Clustered by Industries and Regions
Africa (14)
Asia-Pacific (308)
Europe (287)
North America (429)
South America (18)
Industries(# companies)
Regions (# companies)
= 1,056companies
Auto-motive
& Supply
(62)
Che-micals
(78)
ConsumerGoods(104)
Machi-nery
& Con-struction
(81)
Media&
Enter-tain-ment(76)
Mining&
Mate-rials(88)
Multi-busi-ness(41)
Phar-ma&
Bio-tech(65)
Pulp&
Paper(27)
Retail(119)
Tech-nology(107)
Trans-port
&Logistics
(58)
Travel&
Tourism(67)
Utilities(83)
Sources: BCG Value Creators Report "Spotlight on growth", 2006; BCG analysis
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
AGENDA
The remarkable Indian value creation story
Decomposing the value creation of Indian companies
Overall winners
TSR Decomposition Methodology
Contacts
Appendix: Industry-wise top value creators
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURINGTop Performers
Company
1. Thermax2. Crompton Greaves3. Siemens
1. Praj Industries Ltd2. Greaves Cotton Ltd3. Lakshmi Machine Works
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
4,5607,315
18,389
317515433690
TSR (02-07)
95%88%86%
224%133%115%
TSR (01-06)
101%116%
90%
206%119%
98%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
MATERIALS AND COMMODITIES Top Performers
Company
1. Thermax2. Crompton Greaves3. Siemens
1. Praj Industries Ltd2. Greaves Cotton Ltd3. Lakshmi Machine Works
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
4,5607,315
18,389
317515433690
TSR (02-07)
95%88%86%
224%133%115%
TSR (01-06)
101%116%
90%
206%119%
98%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONTop Performers
Company
1. Unitech2. Aban Offshore Lt3. Larsen & Toubro
1. Ansal Properties2. Kalpataru Power3. Simplex Infrastructure
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
31,4497,474
45,663
3,0382,8851,553
TSR (02-07)
257%173%
86%
192%162%143%
TSR (01-06)
151%176%
70%
NA146%
NA
Large Cap
Mid Cap
AUTOMOTIVE AND SUPPLYTop Performers
Company
1. M & M2. M I C O3. Amtek Auto
1. Bharat Earth Movers2. Motherson Sumitomo3. Exide Industries
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
19,14910,459
4,701
3,9782,5203,188
TSR (02-07)
73%70%55%
91%80%71%
TSR (01-06)
65%63%55%
140%72%53%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS Top Performers
Company
1. Container Corporation2. Shipping Corporation of India
1. Great Eastern Shipping
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
12,6604,913
3,090
TSR (02-07)
54%27%
55%
TSR (01-06)
63%50%
70%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS Top Performers
Company
1. Godrej Industries2. United Phosporous3. Tata Chemicals
1. Gujarat Flourochem2. Sintex Industries3. GHCL
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
4,7106,0874,464
3,2442,3521,614
TSR (02-07)
146%114%
37%
140%116%
77%
TSR (01-06)
91%95%48%
137%117%
98%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
TELECOMTop Performers
Company
1. Bharti Airtel2. V S N L3. M T N L
1. Tata Teleservice
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
144,82611,466
9,245
3,818
TSR (02-07)
82%17%
3%
25%
TSR (01-06)
NA11%10%
23%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
OIL AND GAS Top Performers
Company
1. Essar Oil2. O N G C3. Mangalore Refineries
1. Chennai Petroleum
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
6,224188,392
5,934
2,796
TSR (02-07)
55%43%38%
48%
TSR (01-06)
53%64%
2%
58%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
PHARMACEUTICALS, BIOTECH AND HEALTHCARE Top Performers
Company
1. Glenmark Pharma2. Lupin3. Sun Pharma
1. Jubilant Organosys2. Ipca Labs3. Panacea Biotech
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
7,3384,870
20,341
3,7341,5052,739
TSR (02-07)
92%62%46%
112%71%66%
TSR (01-06)
94%142%
46%
134%NA
55%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
IT Top Performers
Company
1. Infosys Technologies2. MphasiS Ltd3. Satyam Computers
1. Hexaware2. Infotech Enterprises3. Rolta India
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
112,9804,619
31,142
2,1911,6692,654
TSR (02-07)
35%34%30%
70%31%29%
TSR (01-06)
25%50%31%
44%NA
35%
Large Cap
Mid Cap
FMCG, RETAIL AND DURABLES Top Performers
Company
1. Pantaloon Retail2. Videocon Industries3. United Spirits
1. S Kumars 2. Titan Industries3. Godrej Consumer
Market Cap(Rs. cr) Mar 07
5,5269,8907,863
1,3883,7413,316
TSR (02-07)
121%103%
78%
67%67%62%
TSR (01-06)
NA78%
NA
NA84%
NA
Large Cap
Mid Cap
End of deck