Independent State of Papua New Guinea National Airports ...open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12233490_01.pdf · several missing links in the trunk line road network in Papua New Guinea

Independent State of Papua New Guinea National Airports Corporation (NAC)

Preparatory Survey on the Project

for Nadzab (Lae) Airport Rehabilitation

in Independent State of Papua New Guinea

Final Report

March 2015

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Japan Airport Consultants, Inc. (JAC)

Azusa Sekkei Co., Ltd. (AZS) Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. (OCG) PN

CR

14-006

1USD＝108.1Yen

1USD＝2.245PGK 1PGK = 48.2 Yen

December 2014

Preparatory Survey on the Project for Nadzab (Lae) Airport Rehabilitation JICA Independent State of Papua New Guinea NAC

1

SUMMARY

1. General

Independent State of Papua New Guinea, with its population of 7.17 million in 2012, consists of more than 600 islands including eastern half of New Guinea Island (main island) as well as Islands of Bismarck, New Britain, Louisilade, etc. In addition, the main island has a complex chain of mountain ranges consisting of Bismarck and Owen Stanley Ranges (highest elevation 3000m to 4000m), which divide the main island to the north and south. Surface of the country other than mountain is covered by deep rain forest. Due to the harsh topographic conditions, there are still several missing links in the trunk line road network in Papua New Guinea. Therefore, the air transport plays its vital role in transportation of people in Papua New Guinea.

The city of Lae (population in 2011 Census was about 149 thousand), the second largest city after the capital city of Port Moresby (population in 2011 Census was about 364 thousand), has the port of Lae which handles the largest volume of cargo in Papua New Guinea. Lae is connected by the Highland Highway with Highland area where abundant agricultural products are grown and several natural resource developments are ongoing. Lae is recognized as one of the industrial and logistic centers in Papua New Guinea, but it is connected with Port Moresby only by the air and sea.

Figure 1-1 Map of Papua New Guinea

Nadzab Airport, located approximately 35km to the west-north-west of Lae, is the second largest airport in Papua New Guinea, having 2438-m long runway. Nadzab Airport handled approximately 300 thousand domestic passengers in 2012, and its average annual growth rate from 2008 to 2012 reached 13%. However, Nadzab Airport has several deficiencies as listed below:


2

Existing runway width of 30m is not sufficient to accommodate B737 type aircraft; Pavement strength of the runway, taxiway and apron is not sufficient to accommodate B737 type

aircraft; The passenger terminal building is outdated and short of capacity.

Therefore, it is not capable of accommodating the increasing air traffic demand properly and efficiently.

Figure 1-2 Location of Nadzab Airport, City of Lae and Highland Area

Under such circumstance, the Government of Papua New Guinea has been considering a possibility to borrow Yen Loan for rehabilitation of Nadzab Airport, and JICA decided to implement the Preparatory Survey on the Project for Nadzab (Lae) Airport Rehabilitation in Papua New Guinea (hereinafter referred to as the “Preparatory Survey”).

It should be clearly understood that, although results of the Preparatory Survey will be used as the basis for subsequent project appraisal by JICA, the scope of the Project covered by Yen Loan is to be finally decided during the course of the appraisal and shall not necessarily be the same as the results of the Preparatory Survey. It should also be so understood that the decision to implement the Project under JICA Yen Loan will be made by way of bilateral agreement between the Government of Japan and the Government of Papua New Guinea.

City of Lae

Nadzab Airport

Highland Highway

Eastern Highland


3

2. Background and Need of the Project

2.1 General Information of Papua New Guinea

1) Regions and Provinces

Papua New Guinea consists of four regions and the regions are further divided into one capital district and 22 provinces as shown in Figure 2.1-1 and Table 2.1-1. Nadzab/Lae Airport is located in Morobe Province (numbered 11 below).

Figure 2.1-1 Provinces of Papua New Guinea

Table 2.1-1 Regions and Provinces of Papua New Guinea No. Province Capital Region No. Province Capital Region

1 Central Port Moresby Southern 12 New Ireland Kavieng Islands

2 Chimbu Kundiawa Highlands 13 Northern Popondetta Southern

3 Eastern Highlands Goroka Highlands 14 AR*1 of Bougainville Arawa Islands

4 East New Britain Kokopo Islands 15 Southern Highlands Mendi Highlands

5 East Sepik Wewak Momase 16 Western Daru Southern

6 Enga Wabag Highlands 17 Western Highlands Mount Hagen Highlands

7 Gulf Kerema Southern 18 West New Britain Kimbe Islands

8 Madang Madang Momase 19 West Sepik Vanimo Momase

9 Manus Lorengau Islands 20 NCD*2 Port Moresby Southern

10 Milne Bay Alotau Southern 21 Hela Tari Highlands

11 Morobe Lae Momase 22 Jiwaka Minj Highlands

Note. AR*1: Autonomous Region, NCD*2: National Capital District


4

2) Major Socio-economic Indices

Tables 2.1-2 and 2.1-3 show major socio-economic indices of Papua New Guinea. GDP at 1998 constant price stagnated from 1996 to 2007 (growth rate 1.6%), followed by a sharp increase thereafter (7.8%). The population increased almost constantly from 1996 to 2012 at around 2.4 to 2.5%. As a result, GDP per Capita decreased or stagnated from 1996 to 2007, followed by annual 5.3% increase.

Table 2.1-2 Major Socio-economic Indices of Papua New Guinea

Table 2.1-3 Average Annual Growth Rates of Real GDP

Period Total GDP GDP per Capita Population

1996-2007 1.6% -0.9% 2.5%

2007-2012 7.8% 5.3% 2.4%

Table 2.1-4 shows GDP growth rates of industrial sectors and their share in total GDP. Since 2006, the construction sector was the driving force of economic growth. The construction sector GDP increased at annual growth rates of 15.1% from 2003 to 2012 and 21.7% from 2008 to 2012 respectively, expanding its share in total GDP from 11.7% in 2006 to 16.7% in 2012.

PopulationKina Change Kina USD Person

(billion) (%) (million)1996 7.960 6.599 1,715 1,110 4.6401997 7.455 -6.343 1,566 1,034 4.7611998 7.804 4.682 1,598 771 4.8831999 7.948 1.856 1,588 686 5.0062000 7.753 -2.455 1,511 682 5.1302001 7.750 -0.045 1,474 584 5.2562002 7.905 2.008 1,468 566 5.3842003 8.252 4.388 1,496 674 5.5152004 8.299 0.570 1,470 740 5.6472005 8.625 3.924 1,492 842 5.7812006 8.823 2.294 1,491 934 5.9172007 9.454 7.152 1,561 1,047 6.0562008 10.079 6.614 1,627 1,291 6.1962009 10.698 6.134 1,688 1,279 6.3392010 11.519 7.680 1,773 1,495 6.4972011 12.748 10.669 1,914 1,932 6.6602012 13.785 8.132 2,019 2,217 6.826

Current PriceSource: IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2014

YearGDP GDP per Capita

1998 Constant Price


5

Table 2.1-4 Sectoral GDP Growth Rates and Share

Item Year Total Agriculture Mining Manufac.

Electricity

Gas &

Water

Construction Trade Transport &

Communication Finance

Public

Administration Others

Growth

Rates

2004 0.6% -0.2% -1.8% 2.3% 1.7% 3.2% 3.2% 2.6% -3.4% -2.4% 1.0%

2005 3.9% 5.6% 1.2% 8.3% 5.1% 4.8% 3.5% 3.0% 10.2% 2.0% 21.7%

2006 2.3% 1.0% -8.5% 4.0% 1.3% 12.0% 8.4% 5.0% 9.7% 3.0% 12.4%

2007 7.2% 4.2% -0.1% 6.0% 4.0% 16.0% 10.0% 41.3% 5.0% 4.0% 30.2%

2008 6.6% 4.3% -1.4% 6.0% 6.8% 15.0% 7.0% 39.9% 6.0% 3.0% 6.5%

2009 6.1% 0.7% -1.7% 0.2% 7.5% 19.8% 9.5% 29.0% 15.0% 3.0% 7.3%

2010 7.6% 2.9% -2.0% 14.0% 9.4% 17.1% 12.6% 20.1% 9.5% 3.3% 4.9%

2011 11.3% 8.6% -11.8% 13.0% 9.5% 26.0% 18.0% 16.0% 20.1% 5.0% 3.9%

2012 9.2% 0.2% 0.6% 10.0% 12.0% 24.0% 15.0% 16.0% 10.0% 6.0% 4.7%

‘03-‘12 6.0% 3.0% -2.9% 7.0% 6.3% 15.1% 9.6% 18.4% 8.9% 3.0% 9.9%

‘08-‘12 8.5% 3.0% -3.8% 9.2% 9.6% 21.7% 13.7% 20.2% 13.6% 4.3% 5.2%

Share 2006 100.0% 37.6% 11.7% 7.7% 1.5% 11.7% 7.1% 2.6% 4.1% 13.2% 2.7%

2012 100.0% 32.5% 8.5% 7.5% 1.5% 16.7% 7.9% 6.2% 4.5% 11.5% 3.3%

Data source: Key Indicators for Asia and Pacific 2013, ADB


6

2.2 Current Conditions and Issues of Aviation Sector in Papua New Guinea

1) General Air Transport Structure

Figure 2.2-1 illustrates the general structure of the institutions in the transport sector at national level. The Department of Transport (DOT) has the primary responsibility for the transport sector, headed by the Secretary for Transport under the Minister.

P a r l i a m e n tS h a r e h o l d e r s / O w n e r s

M i n i s t e r( T r a n s p o r t , W o r k s . C i v i l A v i a t i o n )

M i n i s t e r( S O E s . C i v i l A v i a t i o n )

S e c r e t a r yB o a r d / A u t h o r i t y / C o u n c i lB o a r d / D i r e c t o r sB o a r d / D i r e c t o r s / O w n e r s

D e p a r t m e n t a l O f f i c e r sE x e c u t i v e M a n a g e m e n tE x e c u t i v e M a n a g e m e n tE x e c u t i v e M a n a g e m e n t

G o v e r n m e n t D e p a r t m e n t s( D O T , D O W )

S t a t u t o r y A u t h o r i t i e s( C A S A , A I C , e t c . )

S t a t e - O w n e d C o r p o r a t i o n s( N A C , P N G A S L , A i r

N i u g i n i , e t c . )

T r a n s p o r t a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p a n i e s

P o l i c y , P l a n n i n g a n d L e g i s l a t i o n M a t t e r s

P u b l i c

C o m m e r c i a l O p e r a t i o n sP r i v a t e

Figure 2.2-1 Institutional Structure of the Transport Sector

Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy


7

2) Air Transport Sector Structure

Figure 2.2-2 shows the present structure of the government agencies in civil aviation. The governing legislation is the “Civil Aviation Act 2000”, which is shortly to be amended to reflect all of the institutional changes, for which the minister of civil aviation is the responsible minister.

The recently formed Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the principal regulatory agency in the sector and is responsible for safety certification of air operators, aircraft, air crew, air traffic controllers and airports. PNG Air Services Ltd. (PNGASL) is the State Owned Enterprise (SOE) responsible for providing, maintaining and developing air navigation and airways services infrastructure. PNGASL also coordinates aviation search and rescue. National Airports Corporation (NAC) is the SOE responsible for the operation, maintenance and development of 21 national government owned airports. The Accident Investigation Commission (AIC) is a recently formed body responsible for investigation of the circumstances of air accidents on a “no fault” basis with a view to future prevention.

Minister for Transport Minister for Civil Aviation

Secretary for TransportNational Airports

Corporation (NAC) Board

PNG Air Services Ltd. (PNGASL) Board

Accident Investigation Commission (AIC)

DOT Policy & Planning Wing

DOT Air Transportation Division CASA Executive PNGASL Executive

- Ministerial advice- Policy and Planning- Sector Monitoring- Budget Coordination

DOT Transport Secretary Unit

Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Board

NAC Executive AIC Executive

- Air transport regulation- International air agreement negotiation- Air service licensing

- Policy and regulatory enforcement for aviation security

- Civil aviation safety regulatory enforcement and monitoring- Airport and aerodrome operation certification- Air crew certification- Airlines certification- Air traffic controller training and certification

- Provision of air navigation and airways services

- Maintenance, development and asset management of national government owned airports

- Investigation of the circumstances and causes of air accidents and incidents with a view to future prevention

Figure 2.2-2 Institutional Structure of Air Transport Sector



8

3) National Airports Corporation

National Airports Corporation (NAC) is a state-owned enterprise established under the Civil Aviation Act as amended. NAC evolved from airport division function of the former Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) through NEC approved Civil Aviation Authority Reform Program that separated the regulatory functions from the commercial functions of former CAA. NAC operates and maintains 22 national airports including Port Moresby International Airport and Nadzab Airport. NAC was registered in October 2009 and started its operation on 1st April 2010. There are 417 staff force in NAC as of October 2014. Under the NAC Board, NAC is headed by the Managing Director and CEO, and there are six major functional organizations consisting of:

i) Corporate services; ii) Finance; iii) Operations; iv) CADIP Project; v) Commercial; and vi) Strategic Planning and Development.

NAC Board

Managing Director & CEO

Company Secretary & Executive Officer Executive Secretary

Internal Audit Unit

General ManagerCorporate Services Finance Manager

Group General Manager

Operations

Director CADIP Projects

General ManagerCommercial

Strategic Planning & Development

Unit

General ManagerRegional Airports

AVSEC Policy & Compliance Consultant

General ManagerPMIA

Chief Fire Officer

Engineering Services

Figure 2.2-3 General Organizational Structure of NAC as of 2011-2013 (Source: NAC)

The revenues from operation, which accounted for more than 95% of the total revenues, have almost doubled in 3 years from PGK 46.3 million in 2010 to 91.1 million in 2013. The total expenses increased by approximately 70% from PGK 52.7 million in 2010 to PGK 89.8 million in 2013. As a result, NAC operated at loss from trading in 2010 and 2012 but turned to positive in 2013. The accumulated operating loss from trading decreased from maximum PGK 8.9 million


9

(negative) in 2012 to PGK 4.5 million (negative) in 2013. Meanwhile, NAC received grants from the Government of Papua New Guinea, Australian Aid, Esso Highlands and Air Niugini, especially in an amount of PGK 45.3 million in 2013 and the operating profit before income tax in 2013 was PGK 49.8 million. These grants are for capital investment program for NAC.

Table 2.2-1 Profit and Loss of NAC (Summary: Million PGK)

Item 2010 2011 2012 2013

Total Revenues 47.5 59.9 74.0 94.2

Revenue from Operations 46.3 57.7 72.5 91.1

Other Incomes 1.1 2.2 1.5 3.1

Total Expenses 52.7 58.0 79.5 89.8

Expenses for Finance & Administration 24.4 26.4 34.3 41.3

Expenses for Operations 28.3 31.6 45.2 48.5

Operating Profit (Loss) from Trading (5.2) 1.9 (5.6) 4.5

Accumulated Profit/Loss from Trading (5.2) (3.3) (8.9) (4.4)

Nonoperational Income (Grants) 18.4 1.1 5.2 45.3

Operating Profit (Loss) before Income Tax 13.2 3.0 (0.4) 49.8

Source: National Airports Corporation


10

4) Air Transportation Services and Operations

[International] The main international carrier is the government-owned airline Air Niugini (ANG) which operates bulk of international services and routes. ANG currently operates B767-300AER, B737-700/800, Fokker F100 and Bombardier Q400 aircraft on its international services. International scheduled services currently available at Port Moresby are:

Air Niugini; Singapore, Brisbane, Cairns, Nandi, Honiara, Hong Kong, Manila, Narita and Sydney.

Qantas Link; Cairns. Virgin Australia; Brisbane.

[Domestic] There are following four airlines, among other very small airlines, operating domestic scheduled services at Port Moresby and Nadzab Airports:

Air Niugini; Airlines PNG; Travel Air; and North Coast.

The domestic air networks at Port Moresby and Nadzab by each of the above-listed airlines are shown in Figure 2.2-5.

Figure 2.2-4 International Air Network to/from Port Moresby


11

Figure 2.2-5 Domestic Air Networks at Port Moresby and Nadzab

Source: Flight Schedule of each airline

Network to/from Port Moresby Airport Network to/from Lae Airport

Airlines PNG

Air Niugini

Travel Air

North Coast Aviation

Airlines PNG

Air Niugini

Travel Air



12

5) Nadzab Airport

Nadzab Airport is the second busiest airport in Papua New Guinea after Port Moresby. Nadzab Airport is being operated and maintained by National Airports Corporation except for the CNS/ATM which is under responsibility of PNGASL. Majority of the airport facilities were developed during 1970’ and now are aged and deteriorated. Currently there are four airlines operating at Nadzab Airport, however historical passenger movements data are only available for Air Niugini and Airlines PNG because Travel Air and North Coast started their operations at Nadzab recently. Table 2.2-2 and Figure 2.2-6 show passenger movements record of Air Niugini and Airlines PNG at Nadzab Airport.

The existing condition of airport facilities at Nadzab Airport is summarized in Table 2.2-3. Majority of the airport facilities were developed about 40 years ago to accommodate F28 class aircraft. Therefore, the old and outdated facilities and equipment are already deteriorated and require rehabilitation and/or reconstruction even to accommodate the aircraft currently operating at Nadzab such as F100, Q400, etc.

Passengers Change2003 1502004 154 2.7%2005 167 8.4%2006 169 1.2%2007 198 17.2%2008 221 11.6%2009 239 8.1%2010 264 10.5%2011 280 6.1%2012 296 5.7%

YearLae

Table 2.2-2 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab

Figure 2.2-6 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab Airport

Source: Air Niugini, Airlines PNG Source: Air Niugini, Airlines PNG


13

Table 2.2-3 Summary Description of Existing Facilities at Nadzab Airport Items Description

ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code 4C

Aerodrome Reference Point 06o 34’ 190” S 146o 43’ 575”E

Elevation 71.0 m Reference Temperature 34.0 degree Celsius Operational Hours 24 hours Runway 09/27 Dimension 2,438 m x 30 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both sides) Surface Asphalt concrete Strength PCN 30/F/B/X/U Longitudinal Slope 0.3 % Stopway (RWY 09) Dimension W = 30 m, L=60 m Surface Asphalt concrete Stopway (RWY 27) Dimension W = 30 m, L=60 m Surface Asphalt concrete Clearway (RWY 09) Dimension - Clearway (RWY 27) Dimension - Runway Strip Dimension 2,560 m x 150 m Parallel Taxiway Width 15 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both sides) (by Drawing) Surface Asphalt concrete Stub Taxiway Width 15 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both sides) (by Drawing) Surface Asphalt concrete Main Loading Apron Number of aircraft stands 6 stands (5 for small aircraft and 1 for B737) Dimension/Area 430m X 90m =38,700 m2 (by CAD) Surface Asphalt concrete CNS/ATM ATC services Being provided by PNGASL at Control Tower Navigation VOR/DME installed in 2011 Aeronautical Ground Lights

Approach Lights Not provided. PAPI Provided for both approach runways in good condition. RWY lights, TWY lights, apron flood lights, etc.

Majority of the existing lights procured/ installed about 40 years ago, requiring replacement.

Passenger Terminal Building (PTB)

Summary Single level terminal with floor space of approx. 2,600 m2

built in around 1976, old and deteriorated. Cargo Handling Currently undertaken inside PTB Control Tower Summary Although serious deterioration or damage to the basic

structure is not recognized, deterioration appears at some part and elements of the tower.

Rescue & Fire-fighting Station

Summary Visibility to the airside is very much limited. Building is old and deteriorated, and inappropriately located facing parallel to the runway. Fire alarm, monitoring, communication system and fire-fighting water supply not properly working.

Administration Building Summary Space is enough but communication, monitoring and control system does not work anymore.

Potable Water/Sewage Water/Engine Generators Generally very old/outdated and require improvement. Access Road Summary 3.4-m wide single lane on each side. Pavement surface is

now in good condition but will require resurfacing in short to medium-term. Drainage facilities need to be provided.

Circulation Road and Car Park

New circulation road and car park should be provided based on the terminal area improvement plan.


14

2.3 Airport Traffic Forecast

1) Domestic Passengers and Aircraft Movements

Domestic passenger and aircraft movement forecast has been carried out based on the following:

i) Real GDP record by industrial sector published by ADB has been used as the base economic data. Total GDP and non-mineral GDP have been tested for appropriateness as the explanatory variable.

ii) Passenger movement record of Air Niugini and Airlines PNG from 2003 to 2012 has been used as the base traffic data. Conversion from the base data to total including Travel Air and North Coast has been made using the 2012 record.

iii) Based on the base economic and traffic data, regression analyses have been carried out to obtain the future domestic air passenger demand forecasting model. As a result, the linear type model with total GDP as the explanatory parameter has been employed.

iv) Future growth of the total GDP has been assumed based on the future projections by the IMF and ADB as well as the Government of Papua New Guinea (GPNG) as shown below:

Year GDP Growth Rate References

2013 4.6% Projected in IMF World Economic Outlook 2014 2014 6.0%

2015 20.0% IMF/ADB (rounded)

2016 and after 3.3% Average of IMF and GPNG Estimates

v) Based on the linear type forecasting model as well as the assumed future growth rates of the

total GDP, future domestic air passenger demand at Nadzab Airport has been estimated: vi) Peak-day and peak-hour factors have been assumed to be 1/326 (peak-day) and 0.13

(peak-hour) respectively. vii) Domestic aircraft movements have been estimated based on the assumed passenger share by

airlines, share of routes of each airline, average seat capacity and average load factors of the aircraft.


15

viii) Estimated annual, peak-day and peak-hour domestic passenger movements are as shown below:

Year Annual Domestic

Passengers Peak-day Domestic

Passengers Peak-hour Domestic Passengers

(Two-way)

2021 600,000 1,840 240

2026 718,000 2,200 290

2031 858,000 2,630 340

ix) Estimated peak-day domestic aircraft movements are as shown below:

Aircraft Typical Seat Capacity 2021 2026 2031

B737-800 158 4 6 10

70-seater/ATR72 75/72 32 34 34

F50 58 6 6 6

Britain Norman (BN) 9 6 8 10

Total - 48 54 60

x) Estimated peak-hour domestic aircraft movements are as shown below:

Aircraft Type 2021 2026 2031

B737 0.52 0.78 1.30

70-seater, ATR 72 4.16 4.42 4.42

F50 0.78 0.78 0.78 Britain Norman (BN) 0.78 1.04 1.30

Total 6.24 7.02 7.80


16

2) International Passenger and Aircraft Movements

International passenger and aircraft movement forecast has been carried out based on the following:

i) As any scheduled international passenger flight is currently not operated at Nadzab Airport, potential international passenger demand has been estimated based on the following two data; a) Daily number of Nadzab-departed domestic passengers for seven days a week who

transferred to international flights at Port Moresby (based on data provided by Air Niugini).

b) Daily number of international departing passengers for seven days a week at Port Moresby who originated their trips at Nadzab (based on the interview survey at Port Moresby for a week).

ii) Based on the data item a) of i) above as well as the result of domestic passenger forecast (Air Niugini passengers), daily potential international passenger demand for seven days a week (Case 1) has been estimated.

iii) Based on the international passenger movement record as well as the assumed future total GDP, the future international passenger traffic demand at Port Moresby has been estimated, and then based on the interview survey data potential daily international passenger demand at Nadzab Airport for seven days a week (Case 2) has been estimated.

iv) The figures obtained as Cases 1 and 2 have been averaged to obtain the future daily international passenger demand at Nadzab Airport for seven days a week by destinations.

v) Departing flights on specific days of a week when load factor of not less than 60% may be expected has been assumed to be viable for international scheduled operations. Scheduled operations to Brisbane by B737 from 2021 and to Cairns by 70-seater aircraft from 2026 on Thursday and/or Friday are expected to be viable.

vi) The return flights have been assumed to be from Brisbane/Cairns to Port Moresby via Nadzab on Monday or Tuesday.

vii) Result of the international passenger movement forecast is summarized as shown in the table below:


17

Year Route Dep./Arr. Aircraft Weekly Passengers (Aircraft Movements) Annual

Passengers Mon. or Tue. Thurs. Fri. Total

2021

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - - 120 (1) 120 (1) 6,200

Arr. 120 (1) - - 120 (1) 6,200

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - - - -

Arr. - - - - -

Total Dep.

- - - 120 (1) 120 (1) 6,200

Arr. 120 (1) - - 120 (1) 6,200

2026

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - - 140 (1) 140 (1) 7,300

Arr. 140 (1) - - 140 (1) 7,300

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - 50 (1) 50 (1) 2,600

Arr. 50 (1) - - 50 (1) 2,600

Total Dep.

- - - 190 (2) 190 (2) 9,900

Arr. 190 (2) - - 190 (2) 9,900

2031

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - 100 (1) 140 (1) 240 (2) 12,500

Arr. 240 (2) - - 240 (2) 12,500

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - 60 (1) 60 (1) 3,100

Arr. 60(1) - - 60 (1) 3,100

Total Dep.

- - 100 (1) 200 (2) 300 (3) 15,600

Arr. 300 (3) - - 300 (3) 15,600

3) Air Cargo Movements

The future air cargo movements at Nadzab Airport have been estimated based on the average volumes of air cargo per passenger on the flights between Nadzab and Port Moresby (0.01 t/Pax.) as well as between Nadzab and other than Port Moresby (0.005 t/Pax.).

4) Airport Access Traffic

Airport access traffic forecast has been carried out based on the following assumptions:

Number of well-wishers per passenger (base on the interview survey); 0.82. Number of airport staff per passenger (based on the current number); 0.25. Assumed modal split ratios of the passengers and well-wishers as well as the airport staff are

as shown below (base on the interview survey); [Passengers and Well-wishers]

Private Car PMV Coach66% 24% 10%


18

[Airport Staff]

Note. PMV: Public Motor Vehicle

Assumed average number of passengers per vehicle as shown below;

It has been estimated that daily number of the airport access vehicles would reach approximately 1380 in 2026 and 1620 in 2031 respectively which can be accommodated by the two-lane airport access road.

Private Car PMV48% 52%

Private Car PMV Coach2.7 6.3 2.6


19

2.4 Status and Role of Nadzab Airport in National Development Plan

There are two major national development plans of Papua New Guinea as follows:

i) National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030 published by Department of National Planning and Monitoring in March 2010 as the guide to success.

ii) Medium-term Development Plan; the first 5-year medium-term development plan for realization of the targets stipulated in the National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030.

National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030 stipulated that “International airport may also be required near cities such as Lae that are important hubs for international business.

According to the Medium-term Development Plan, “Regional airports will be upgraded to allow higher seating capacity jets to cater for the anticipated increase in the number of passengers as a result of increased economic activities”.

According to the National Transport Strategy Volume 3 Detailed Strategy dated July 2013, the latest transport development strategy prepared by the Department of Transport, Nadzab was expected to be:

i) One of two long range international airports as an alternate diversion airport for PMIA; and

ii) Upgraded to medium range regional standard by 2030.

In summary, it is considered reasonable to assume future role of Nadzab Airport as one of the regional airports:

a) Capable of accommodating short to medium range international and domestic operations by B737-800 class aircraft;

b) Alternative to Port Moresby International Airport in case of its temporary closure due to bad weather, etc.


20

2.5 Related Projects funded by ADB and Others

1) Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (CADIP)

In order to address development challenges of 21 national airports in Papua New Guinea, the Civil Aviation Development Invest Program (CADIP) has been adopted by the Government of Papua New Guinea. CADIP will involve (i) devoting four or more tranches of the Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) to improving compliance with the safety and security standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization; (ii) designing and supervising airport improvements, and preparing and administering long-term maintenance contracts for all the national airports; and (iii) monitoring the socioeconomic benefits from the operating and maintenance improvements in the national airports.

According to ADB document and National Transport Strategy, CADIP will be implemented in four phases, while Phase I being implemented involves improvement of following five airports:

i) Port Moresby (domestic apron, CNS/ATM, fire tenders); ii) Mount Hagen Stage 1 (runway repair, new terminal);

iii) Hoskins Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence); iv) Wewak Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence); and v) Gurney Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence).

2) CNS/ATM Modernization Project by PNG Air Services Limited (PNGASL)

PNGASL has been implementing component projects based on its Communications, Navigations, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) Modernization Project, which is based on PNGASL’s Strategic Development Plan 2011-2015. The modernization is being undertaken in system component projects based on donor funding allocations. The three main agencies providing funds to support PNGASL CNS/ATM Modernization Program are the Government of Papua New Guinea through annual Public Investment Program (PIP) Budget, Australian Aid and ADB MFF through the Civil Aviation Development Improvement Program (CADIP). For Nadzab Airport, the engine generator has already been replaced under this project. Installation of new duplicated HF farms at two identified sites within the airport boundary at Nadzab is to be implemented under the project. PNGASL is planning to refurbish the control tower at Nadzab Airport and seeking for funding.


21

2.6 Need and Target of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project

Majority of the existing facilities, equipment and services at Nadzab Airport are obsolete and deteriorated and they need to be rehabilitated as soon as possible in order to maintain the current level of services.

In addition to the rehabilitation of the existing facilities, etc., Nadzab Airport needs to be upgraded to accommodate the increasing domestic passenger/cargo demand as well as the potential international passenger demand in future. The National Development Plans as well as the National Transport Strategy expected that Nadzab Airport would accommodate short to medium range international and domestic operations by B737-800 class aircraft and to be developed as an alternate international airport for Port Moresby. These roles and functions expected for Nadzab Airport can be supported by the forecast domestic and international air passenger demand.

In conclusion, the target of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project (the Project) may be defined based on its future roles mentioned above as upgrading:

To the second international airport offering short to medium-haul scheduled flights by up to B737;

As the second busiest domestic airport capable of accommodating up to B737 (to be upgraded from current F100); and

To an alternate airport for Port Moresby International Airport.


22

3. Summary Description of the Project

3.1 Objective of the Project

To rehabilitate and improve the facilities, equipment and utilities of Nadzab Airport, thus achieving following project targets:


To expand transport capacity as the second busiest domestic airport capable of accommodating up to B737 (to be upgraded from current F100); and

To an alternate airport for Port Moresby International Airport.

3.2 Project Site

Nadzab Airport located approximately 35km to the west-north-west of Lae in Morobe Province, the Independent State of Papua New Guinea.

3.3 Description of the Project

1) Construction Works

Construction works consist of the following items: [Eligible Portion for JICA Financing]

i) Widening to 45m and pavement reinforcement of the existing runway; ii) Widening to 23m and pavement reinforcement of the existing taxiway B (partial) and

the taxiway C as well as the parallel taxiway C (partial); iii) Construction of a new 23-m wide stub taxiway; iv) Construction of a new cement concrete apron; v) Pavement rehabilitation of other existing taxiways and existing apron; vi) Rehabilitation of the existing airport access road; vii) Installation of Simple Approach Lights (both approach runways); viii) Replacement of the runway lights, taxiway lights and apron flood lights; ix) Replacement of the control and monitoring system for aeronautical ground lights; x) Construction of a new passenger terminal building; xi) Refurbishment of the existing terminal building for cargo handling; xii) Construction of a new administration building; xiii) Construction of a new rescue and fire-fighting station and provision of a fire fighting

vehicle; xiv) Refurbishment of the existing control tower; xv) Improvement of utilities.


23

[Eligible Portion for JICA Financing] i) Improvement and Extension of Erap River Embankment

2) Consulting Services

In order to achieve the efficient and proper preparation and implementation of the Project, following services should be provided by an international consulting firm:

Part 1: Detailed Design and Preparation of Bid Documents; Part 2: Assistance in Bidding; Part 3: Construction Supervision; Part 4: Maintenance Supervision; Part 5: Assistance in Environmental Management; Part 6: Assistance in Reporting to JICA; and Part 7: Technology Transfer.


24

3.4 Project Cost and Source of Fund

1) Total Project Cost

The estimated total project cost including the physical and price contingencies as well as the Project Management Unit cost, taxes and duties is JPY 36,349 million (equivalent to PGK 754 million), while the project cost eligible for JICA financing is JPY 27,734 million (equivalent to PGK 575 million) as tabulated below:

Item FC LC Converted Total

Million JPY Million PGK Million JPY Million PGK

A. Eligible Portion

Construction Works 9,695 308 24,520 509

Consulting Services 1,264 37 3,034 63

Subtotal A 10,959 344 27,555 572

B. Non-eligible Portion

Construction Works 0 21 989 21

Land Acquisition 0 0 0 0

Administration Cost 0 18 856 18

GST & Corporate Tax 0 133 6,400 133

Import Tax 0 11 548 11

Subtotal B 0 182 8,794 182

Total (A+B) 10,959 527 36,349 754

C. Interest during Construction 123 0 123 3

D. Front End Fee 55 0 55 1

Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 11,138 527 36,527 758

JICA Finance Portion (A+C+D) 11,138 344 27,734 575

2) Expected Source of Fund

All of the JICA finance portion including the interest during construction will be covered by Japanese ODA Loan (STEP Loan) while the non-eligible portion should be covered by the Government of Papua New Guinea.


25

3.5 Project Implementation Schedule

Assuming that STEP Loan is the source of fund for the Project and given the required lead time period for the financial arrangement and procurement processes, following project implementation schedule may be envisaged:

i) Project appraisal by JICA; early 2015 followed by prior notification by Japanese Government to Papua New Guinean Government on extension of Japanese ODA Loan.

ii) Exchange of Notes (E/N) and Loan Agreement; first half of 2015. iii) Selection of design and supervision consultant by NAC including concurrence by JICA; from

middle of 2015 to early 2016. iv) Commencement of the consulting services; early 2016. v) Design and tender documentation from early 2016 to early 2017. vi) Selection of the contractor from first half of 2017 to early 2018. vii) Construction works for 30 months from early 2018 to the second half of 2020 followed by

12-month defect notification period.

3.6 STEP Loan and Procurement

1) STEP Loan

It has been proposed that the Project should be implemented in close cooperation between the Government of Papua New Guinea and the Government of Japan through extension of Japanese ODA Loan; more specifically Special Terms for Economic Partnership (STEP) through Japan International Cooperation Agency. STEP covers 100% of the eligible portion of the project cost mainly consisting of the consultant service cost and construction cost including the physical and price contingencies. The costs for the rehabilitation and extension of Erap River embankment and Project Management Unit (PMU) as well as taxes and duties should be borne by the Government of Papua New Guinea and/or National Airports Corporation (NAC). Condition for procurement of the consulting services as well as the goods and services (construction works) is Japan tide, and not less than thirty percent (30%) of the total price of contracts (excluding consulting services) financed by a STEP loan shall be accounted for by goods from Japan and services provided by a Japanese company(ies).

2) Rules for Procurement of Consulting Services as well as Goods and Services

The employment of consultants and procurement of goods and services (construction works) under the Project financed by Japanese ODA Loan from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) is to be carried out in accordance with the general principles and procedures laid down in the Guidelines for the Employment of Consultants under Japanese ODA Loan and the Guidelines for Procurement under Japanese ODA Loans.


26

3) Expected Ratio of Goods and Services from Japan

Cement, asphalt (bitumen), major construction equipment, majority of building construction materials, some of the underground cables and ducts as well as fire tender and the overhead are expected to be procured from Japan. Expected ration of the goods and services from Japan is about 47%.

3.7 Method of Construction

In order to carry out the pavement widening and reinforcement/rehabilitation works on the existing runway, taxiways and apron while keeping them operational, the asphalt overlay will be employed. The new apron will be of cement concrete pavement. The pavement works and aeronautical ground lighting works on the runway will be carried out phase by phase, involving partial closure of the runway while maintaining aircraft operations; for example the western part of the runway is to be kept operational when the works are conducted on the eastern part during daytime. The works on the central part of the runway need to be conducted during the nighttime. The works on the taxiways and apron will be conducted during the daytime as much as possible.

As the soil underneath the new passenger terminal building has adequate bearing capacity to support the design load, the new passenger terminal building will be of a spread foundation. As for the building structure, steel construction is deemed appropriate at this point of planning because of the following: Low risk of saline corrosion due to its inland location; Long span structure may be employed; Local contractors are familiar with this type of structure; and Shorter construction period than RC structure.

After the new passenger terminal building is completed and passenger handling transferred, the existing passenger terminal building is to be refurbished for cargo handling.

The other works are to be scheduled accordingly to complete the entire works within 30 months.


27

3.8 Project Implementation Organization

National Airport Corporation (NAC) is the project executing agency. NAC currently has 417 staff force in total. NAC has been implementing the Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (CADIP), financed by ADB, for which NAC organized a Project Management Unit, supported by an engineering consultant.

For implementation of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project, NAC will organize a Project Management Unit (PMU) similarly to CADIP, consisting of a project director, technical and administrative staff. PMU will be assisted by an international consultant.

3.9 Operation and Maintenance after Project Implementation

Currently NAC Nadzab has four major functions and 38 staff members; the logistic support and administration, technical services response team, ground services and emergency services, headed by the Operations Manager. NAC Nadzab has been experiencing several difficulties related to the operation and maintenance budget, gaps in the technical experiences between senior and junior staff and less opportunity for training and familiarization to the modern technology.

For operation and maintenance of Nadzab Airport after implementation of the Project, adequate number of staff should be stationed to operate the airport as an international alternate airport and the staff should be given necessary training and familiarization to operate and maintain the new facilities, equipment and services. At the same time, adequate amounts of budget should be made available for preventive maintenance, immediate repair as well as for staff training.


28

3.10 Environmental Impact and Social Consideration

1) Baseline of the Environmental and Social Condition

a) Natural Environment

Nadzab airport is located 45km northwest from Lae central city area along the Highlands highway. Surrounding area is generally flat with savannah grassland and Erap River to the west of the airport. In recent years, the flood of Erap River has become a problem in surrounding areas including Nadzab airport. The mitigation measures for the airport are studied in the survey. The climate of Nadzab is categorized in the tropical monsoon and classified into rainy season (from November to April) and dry season (from May to October). Annual average temperature is 35 degrees C in day-time and 24 in night-time at coasts, and 28 in day-time and 14 at highlands. Regardless of the classification between rainy season and dry season, rainy season differs according to the region. The annual rainfall differs from 1,200 to 9,000 mm excessively according to the region. There is neither designated natural conservation area nor identified rare species in the airport land and the vicinity.

b) Social Environment

According to the national census on population and housing in 2011, the population of Morobe province, in which Nadzab airport is located, is 675 thousand which is equivalent to 9.3% of national population of PNG. Morobe province is classified into 9 districts, 33 LLG (Local Level Government) and 547 wards. The population of Huon Gulf district, in which Nadzab ward is located, is 78 thousand (16 thousand households), Wampar Rural LLG is 52 thousand (11 thousand households). According to the ”National Gazette No.28” issued by Department of Lands and Physical Planning (DLPP), existing Nadzab airport land with large estate of 1,030 hectares is registered as a declared aerodrome land belongs to the State (Portion No.397) in 1979. There are no designated areas as cultural and historical heritage in the vicinity of the airport but there is a large scale chicken farm to the south of the airport.

2) Legislation and Institution for Environmental and Social Considerations

a) Laws and Regulations

There are no effluent standards such as Air quality, Water quality, Noise and Vibration in PNG. Therefore, NAC refers WHO standards for their implementation.

b) Classification of Environmental Permit and Procedure for Permit

On the Environment (Prescribed Activities) Regulation 2002 in accordance with Environment Act 2000 of PNG, the prescribed activities are classified as Level 1, Level 2 (Category A or Category B) and Level 3 activities according to the content, the scale and the


29

location. The fees for environmental permit are designated by the activity level in the Environment (Fees and Charges) Regulation 2002. The contractor shall pay the prescribed fees during their construction period and the operator/administrator shall pay the fees during their operation period in accordance with the regulation. The upgrading and rehabilitation of existing airport is not listed as Level 2 and Level 3 of the “Prescribed Activities”. However certain associated project activities commonly associated with upgrading and improvement works such as earthworks, surfacing, discharge of waste water, establishment of borrow pits, sourcing and extraction of aggregate materials from surface water courses are Level 2 activities that may require an environmental permit depending on the duration and scale of those activities. For Nadzab Airport, impacts that will arise from the Airport upgrading works will be minimal and generally insignificant as construction works are within the confines of the declared aerodrome land area. The project can be classified as Level 2A because the potential adverse environmental impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and mitigation measures can be designed readily. Adherence to best engineering practices during rehabilitation/ reconstruction and implementation of the environmental management plan (EMP) will avoid or adequately mitigate all of the rehabilitation/ reconstruction-related impacts.

c) Gap from JICA Environmental Guideline

To compare the above mentioned category of the prescribed activities with “Japan International Cooperation Agency, Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations (effective from April 2010, hereinafter referred to as JICA Guideline)”, the level 3 activities in PNG are corresponds to category A activities of JICA guideline, which is required EIA . The level 2 activities in PNG are corresponds to category B activities of JICA guideline, which is required IEE. The level 1 activities in PNG are corresponds to category C activities of JICA guideline, which is not required any environmental procedures. This project can be classified as level 2A and category B as mentioned above. Therefore, JICA study team conducts environmental and social surveys at the IEE level in accordance with TOR.

3) Analysis of Alternatives

Two (2) alternatives of Option 1 and Option 2 were studied on upgrading and rehabilitation of the passenger terminal building. These impacts that will arise from the airport upgrading works will be minimal and generally insignificant as construction works are within the confines of the declared aerodrome land area. The potential adverse environmental impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and mitigation measures can be designed readily. These impacts on the alternatives are expected at almost the same level even though it differs according to the terminal layout and construction duration. Zero option in case the project will not be carried out brings negative impacts which prevent not only air travelling passenger and cargo traffic


30

development but also commercial distribution and sales channels development due to insufficient passenger terminal capacity against increasing air traffic movement in near feature even though negative impacts on natural and social environment are not expected. It is the most reasonable option with the lowest environmental and social negative impacts to utilize the existing airport for further airport development in this region.

4) Scoping

Significant negative impacts by the project are not expected from the scoping result of the project evaluated from the point of view of environmental and social consideration. The negative impacts are mainly pollution during construction phase. The pollution during operation phase (e.g. air pollution, water pollution, aircraft noise and waste) is also expected by increasing airport user from upgrading and rehabilitation of existing airport. On the other hand, the positive impacts are expected to bring local employment creation during construction phase and local economic revitalization during operation phase. Furthermore, upgrading and rehabilitation of terminal building brings positive impacts on landscape around Nadzab airport.

5) Environmental Impact Assessment

a) Initial Environmental Examination (IEE)

IEE was carried out based on the result of survey on existing documents, interview to stakeholders and site surveys etc. According to the result, significant negative impacts by the project are not expected. The negative impacts are mainly pollution during construction phase. The pollutions during operation phase (e.g. air pollution, water pollution, aircraft noise and waste) are also expected by increasing airport user from upgrading and rehabilitation of existing airport. But the impacts that will arise from the airport upgrading works will be minimal and generally insignificant as construction works are within the confines of the declared aerodrome land area. The potential adverse environmental impacts are site-specific, few if any of them are irreversible, and mitigation measures can be designed readily. Adherence to best engineering practices during rehabilitation/ reconstruction and implementation of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) will avoid or adequately mitigate all of the rehabilitation/ reconstruction-related impacts.

b) Aircraft Noise Prediction

The noise contour is stretched from the both ends of runway beyond airport boundary. In comparing the contour in 2014, 2026 and 2031, the area over Lden 62 contour is spread out from the extended line of the both ends of runway. It is, however, the severe negative impact on the local residents is not predicted since the area is mostly inside of the airport property land.


31

6) Environmental Management Plan

As the specific construction and operational activities are not yet fully defined for the project at this stage, the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) given here provides only a general outline of the mitigation measures and monitoring that will be undertaken for the project. It will be necessary to prepare a more detailed EMP during the detailed engineering design phase of the project which needs to be incorporated into the conditions of construction contract so that the Contractor shall properly implement EMP to mitigate negative impacts associated with airport development works.

7) Environmental Monitoring Plan

A general Environmental Monitoring Plan focuses only on impacts of the project that are likely to need attention and which will be incorporated into the final EMP after detailed design. A baseline survey will be conducted by the Contractor prior to commencement of construction works. The Environmental Monitoring Plan includes the main elements, including the Construction and Operations Phase of the project.

8) Frameworks

Effective implementation of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) requires an institutional setting, framework and information flows. The National Airport Corporation (NAC) as the implementing agency will be responsible for the construction phase and operation phase of the project. The responsibility for implementing the environmental management and monitoring plan will be a joint cooperation between the Contactor and NAC. A Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be established within the NAC and an International Environmental Specialist (IES) and Environmental Officer (EO) will form part of the PIU. The PIU will be responsible for the daily implementation of the project. The estimated costs for the EMP that covers environmental mitigation and environmental monitoring plan during the project term (30 months) for construction period and 1 year for assistance period in the start-up of facilities and operation) are estimated at $281,500 covering environmental mitigation at $219,000 and environmental monitoring at $62,500. The EMP amount is equivalent to approx. 0.2% of the total project cost. The annual costs for the EMP on the operation phase are estimated at $23,000. The costs will be part of the NAC budgets after completion of the project.

9) Stakeholder Meetings

As described previously, this project which is assumed as low potential activities on environmental impact (Level 2A) is exempted some environmental procedures with DEC (e.g. advance notice, public hearing, and public consultation). However, official and unofficial meetings were held separately with some relevant stakeholders (e.g. government organizations,


32

airport operation companies, airlines, and chamber of commerce and industry) to proceed this survey appropriately. But there was no opposing view through the meetings.

3.11 Coordination with Other Donors

Construction of the embankment for protection of flood from Erap River will be implemented as a part of the Project but as non-eligible portion for JICA finance. The embankment works will be supervised by NAC. The embankment site will not be overlapped with the site for the works eligible for JICA finance. However, coordination will be required in terms of the layout of contractors’ facilities and storage yards, temporary construction roads, working hours and height limitation of the construction equipment and stock yards.

3.12 Effects of the Project

1) Quantitative Effects

i) Operation and Effect Indicator

Indicator Air Traffic Demand

in Base Year ( CY 2014 ) (*1)

Air Traffic Demand in Target Year After 2 years of commencement

of service ( CY 2023 ) (*2)

After 5 years of commencement

of service ( CY 2026 ) (*3)

Annual Air Passengers (‘000) 360 666 738

Domestic Passengers (‘000) 360 647 718

International Passengers (‘000) - 18 20

Annual Air Cargoes (MT) 2,900 5,142 5,280

Domestic Cargoes (MT) 2,900 4,980 5,100

International Cargoes (MT) - 162 180

Annual Aircraft Movements 10,600 18,646 20,028

Domestic Aircraft Movements 10,600 18,396 19,710

International Aircraft Movements - 250 318 Divert Flight from Jacksons (POM) International Airport - 2 2

(*1) Estimated by JICA Study Team based on actual flight schedule and air traffic forecast (*2) Target Year (CY 2023): Implementation year for JICA post evaluation of The Project (*3) Target Year (CY 2026): Target year for airport facility master plan

ii) Economic and Financial Internal Rate of Returns

a) Economic Internal Rate of Returns (EIRR) Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) has been estimated as 15.7 % by calculating following terms of benefits: Saved loss of business opportunities for PNG nationals due to travel cancellation;


33

Saved loss of consumption by foreign tourists due to visit cancellation; Saved loss of aeronautical charges from foreign air passengers; Saved loss of domestic/international cargo trade opportunities; and Saved loss of diverted flights operating cost by local airlines.

Result of Economic Analysis

Indicators Calculation

Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) 15.7 %

Economic Net Present Value (ENPV) PGK 235,776,000

Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) 1.59

b) Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) has been estimated as -16.8%. However, in case of excluding investment cost from financial cost, NAC will be able to cover the operating costs by operating revenues after opening new facilities.

Result of Financial Analysis (Base Case)

Indicators Calculation

Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) -16.8%

Financial Net Present Value (FNPV) PGK -419,763,000

Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) 0.16

2) Qualitative Effects

Follows effects are expected through implementation of the Project: Improvement of airport safety and airport security; Making airport operations more efficient; Reducing airport congestion; Increase of CS (Customer Satisfaction); Development of economic, social and cultural activities in Morobe area and Papua New

Guinea; and Increase international/global competitiveness of Papua New Guinea.


34

3.13 Erap River Flood Protection

This report is a summary of on-site study on the effects of flood from Erap River.

As official record of floods that affected the airport in the past were unavailable, it was found through

interviews with stakeholders that the most memorable flood happened in early 2000. In this flood, western

edge of the airport was inundated by 30cm of water, however, runway and key facilities remained above

water. The banks of Erap River have since overflown every 2~3 years, however, only areas close to the

banks were inundated by water 30~50cm in depth, and for a short period of the time before subsiding at the

end of the rain.

Record from the past 5 years, the average annual rainfall was 1,832mm, with minimum annual rainfall of

1,589mm in 2012, and maximum annual rainfall of 2,046mm in 2013. The maximum rainfall was

90mm/day, recorded in July 2009 and 2010.

The catchment area of Erap River system is 485.6 ㎢. Although rainfall and catchment area are of common

scale, however the river which runs down 3,600m of elevation in approximately 62km (average gradient of

5.8%) can be found in steep stream.

Improvement of disaster prevention capacity of this scale far exceeds the scope of the Airport Development

Project. It is favorable that a master plan covering both erosion control further upstream of the river and the

flood control downstream of the Erap Bridge is developed and implemented as necessary, should

improvement of flood control is determined necessary as the Erap River basin develop in the future.

However, to enhance the disaster prevention capacity of Nazab Airport facilities, improvement and

extension of the existing embankment is proposed as following three phase construction.

Phase Improve/ New ；Length Rough Construction Cost

1st Phase Improvement ；1,300ｍ PGK 4,427,000

2nd Phase-a Newly Constructed；1,140ｍ PGK 5,859,000

2nd Phase-b Newly Constructed； 260ｍ PGK 1,336,000

3rd Phase-a Newly Constructed； 2,000ｍ PGK 10,278,000

(3rd Phase-b) (Newly Constructed；1,400ｍ) (PGK 7,503,000)

Remarks；3rd phase-b is an alternative of 3rd phase-a, which proposed from economic point of view.

Probability of a 100 year flood peak (Q100) in the vicinity of the airport is not mentioned in the KOICA’s

report which studied in 1993, however, in consideration of Q50 and Q100 at the Erap Bridge, which

estimated in the same report as 1,200 m3/sec and 1,350 m3/sec respectively, it can be assumed that Q100 in

the vicinity of the airport is approx. 1,500 m3/sec or less.


35

The Cabinet Order issued by The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) in Japan, specify minimum requirement for the dimension of the embankment. Under this order, in case the designed flood peak volume is 500 m3/sec ~ 2,000 m3/sec, the minimum required width of the top embankment is 4m, free-board is 1m or more above estimated flood elevation, and the embankment slope is less than 50% gradient. The embankment which is planned by the NAC has a top width of 6m, a free-board of 2m or higher, and a slope is less than 33% gradient, fulfilling the minimum requirement stated in the above mentioned order, and therefore can be considered to be safe.


i

Table of Contents

SUMMARY

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Preparatory Survey Team Organization 1-3 1.3 Scope of Work 1-4 1.4 Work Schedule 1-9

SECTION 2: BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT 2.1 Papua New Guinea 2-1 2.1.1 Socio-Economic Conditions 2-1 2.1.2 Road Networks and Sea Ports 2-19 2.1.3 Air Transport Sector 2-26 2.1.4 Air Transportation Infrastructure Funding 2-38 2.1.5 Air Transport Sector Projects 2-40 2.2 Morobe Province and City of Lae 2-46 2.2.1 Morobe Province 2-46 2.2.2 City of Lae 2-48 2.3 Existing Conditions of Nadzab/Lae Airport 2-49 2.3.1 General Role of Nadzab Airport in Domestic Air Network 2-49 2.3.2 Existing Airport Facilities 2-50 2.3.3 Opinion of Business Leaders on Nadzab Airport 2-57 2.3.4 Status and Role of Nadzab Airport in National Development Plans 2-61

SECTION 3: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY 3.1 Topographic Survey 3-1 3.1.1 General 3-1 3.1.2 Scope of Survey 3-1 3.1.3 Methodology 3-2 3.1.4 Subcontractor 3-4 3.1.5 Result of Survey 3-4 3.2 Soil Investigation 3-7 3.2.1 General 3-7 3.2.2 Scope of Investigation 3-7 3.2.3 Methodology 3-9 3.2.4 Subcontractor 3-10 3.2.5 KOICA Report 3-10


ii

3.2.6 Results of Soil Investigation 3-11 3.2.7 Consideration 3-17

SECTION 4: AIR TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST 4.1 General 4-1 4.2 Methodology for Demand Forecast 4-2 4.3 Projection of Socio-economic Indices 4-3 4.3.1 Socio-Economic Indices as Forecasting Parameters 4-3 4.3.2 Projection of Socio-economic Framework 4-6 4.4 Annual Domestic Passenger Forecast 4-9 4.4.1 Study Flow 4-9 4.4.2 Forecasting Models and Result 4-9 4.5 Domestic Peak Demand Forecast 4-15 4.5.1 Study Flow 4-15 4.5.2 Design Day and Peak-hour Ratio 4-15 4.5.3 Peak Demand 4-16 4.6 Domestic Aircraft Movements Forecast 4-17 4.6.1 Study Flow 4-17 4.6.2 Planning Factors 4-17 4.6.3 Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements 4-18 4.6.4 Peak-hour Domestic Aircraft Movements 4-20 4.7 International Passenger Demand Forecast 4-21 4.7.1 Current Situation of International Passengers Originated from Lae 4-21 4.7.2 Number of International Passengers 4-22 4.8 Airport Access Traffic 4-28 4.8.1 Study Flow 4-28 4.8.2 Planning Factors 4-28 4.8.3 Traffic Volume 4-30 4.9 Annual Air Cargo 4-31 4.9.1 Relation between Passengers and Air Cargo 4-31 4.9.2 Annual Air Cargo Demand 4-31 4.10 Summary Result of Passenger, Cargo and Aircraft Movements Forecast 4-33

SECTION 5: VERIFICATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND EXAMINATION OF FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Target of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project 5-1 5.1.1 Requirements to Enable Future Role of Nadzab/Lae Airport 5-1 5.2 Planning Considerations and Parameters 5-4


iii

5.2.1 Planning Considerations 5-4 5.2.2 Planning Parameters 5-12 5.3 Evaluation of Existing Facilities 5-25 5.3.1 Runway, Taxiway, Apron, Airside Storm Water Drainage and Other Facilities 5-27 5.3.2 Terminal Facilities 5-32 5.3.3 CNS/ATM and AGL 5-43 5.3.4 Erap River Flooding 5-45 5.4 Optional Rehabilitation Measures of Major Project Components 5-47 5.4.1 Runway 5-47 5.4.2 Taxiways 5-59 5.4.3 Aircraft Parking Apron 5-64 5.4.4 Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL) 5-66 5.4.5 Passenger Terminal Building 5-68 5.4.6 Cargo Terminal Building 5-69 5.4.7 Control Tower 5-69 5.4.8 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station and Fire Fighting Vehicle 5-72 5.4.9 NAC Administration Building 5-73 5.4.10 Utilities 5-73 5.4.11 Aircraft Fuel Facilities 5-73 5.4.12 Erap River Flood Protection 5-75 5.5 Examination of Optional Project Scope 5-76 5.5.1 Runway, Taxiways and Aprons and Related Facilities 5-76 5.5.2 Terminal and Related Facilities 5-82 5.5.3 Erap River Embankment 5-82 5.5.4 Proposed Project Components and Preliminary Construction Cost 5-83

SECTION 6: FORMULATION OF AIRPORT MASTER REHABILITATION PLAN 6.1 Confirmation on Airside Separation Requirements 6-1 6.2 Location of New Passenger Terminal Building and New Apron 6-3 6.3 Runway Extension 6-5 6.4 Layout of Other Major Facilities 6-5 6.5 Airport Master Rehabilitation/Development Plan 6-6

SECTION 7: PRELIMINARY DESIGN 7.1 Existing Topography 7-1 7.2 Runway, Taxiways, Apron and Other Civil Works 7-2 7.2.1 Longitudinal Profile Planning 7-2 7.2.2 Cross Sectional Planning 7-3


iv

7.2.3 Other Facilities 7-5 7.2.4 Pavement Structural Planning 7-7 7.2.5 Cost Reduction 7-11 7.2.6 Construction Program and Schedule 7-11 7.2.7 Availability of Basic Materials for Pavement Works 7-27 7.3 Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL) 7-29 7.3.1 Scope of AGL Rehabilitation 7-29 7.3.2 Aeronautical Ground Lights Works 7-30 7.4 Building Works 7-33 7.4.1 Passenger Terminal Building 7-33 7.4.2 Cargo Terminal Building 7-70 7.4.3 Administration Building 7-74 7.4.4 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station 7-77 7.4.5 Control Tower 7-81 7.4.6 Sub Station 7-83 7.5 Utility Works 7-87 7.6 Eco-Airport Measures 7-94 7.7 Cost Reductin 7-97 7.8 Construction Logistics 7-99

SECTION 8: PORJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM 8.1 General Project Implementation Scheme 8-1 8.1.1 General Project Implementation Scheme 8-1 8.1.2 Summary Description of STEP 8-1 8.1.3 Categorization of Project Scope into Eligible

and Non-eligible for JICA-financing 8-3 8.1.4 Expected Ratio of Goods and Services from Japan 8-4 8.2 Project Implementation Schedule 8-10 8.3 Project Cost Estimate 8-12 8.3.1 Preconditions 8-12 8.3.2 Construction Cost and Consulting Service Cost 8-13

SECTION 9: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION 9.1 Need of Project Implementation Unit (PIU) 9-1 9.2 Proposed Project Implementation Unit for Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation 9-3

SECTION 10: OPERATION AND MAINTENACE AFTER IMPLEMENTATION 10.1 Existing Organization of NAC 10-1 10.2 NAC Staff Force 10-3


v

10.3 Profit and Loss of NAC 10-4 10.4 Balance Sheet of NAC 10-7 10.5 Operation and Maintenance of Nadzab Airport 10-8

SECTION 11: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 11.1 General Assumptions 11-1 11.1.1 Objective of Analyses 11-1 11.1.2 With Project Case and Without Project Case 11-2 11.1.3 Annual Air Traffic Demand for Economic and Financial Analysis 11-3 11.1.4 Other Assumptions 11-7 11.2 Economic Analysis 11-8 11.2.1 Estimate of Economic Costs 11-8 11.2.2 Estimate of Economic Benefits 11-12 11.2.3 Result of Economic Analysis 11-17 11.2.4 Sensitivity Analysis 11-19 11.3 Financial Analysis 11-20 11.3.1 Estimate of Financial Costs 11-20 11.3.2 Estimate of Financial Revenues 11-20 11.3.3 Result of Financial Analysis 11-22 11.3.4 Sensitivity Analysis 11-22 11.4 Repayment of Yen Loan 11-24 11.4.1 Statement of Profit and Loss 11-24 11.4.2 Free Cash Flow 11-26 11.5 Operation and Effect Indicator 11-29 11.5.1 Quantitative Effect 11-29 11.5.2 Qualitative Effect 11-31

SECTION 12: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION

12.1 Baseline of the Environmental and Social Condition 12-1 12.1.1 Natural Environment 12-1 12.1.2 Social Environment 12-3

12.2 Legislation and Institution for Environmental and Social Considerations 12-4 12.2.1 Laws and Regulations 12-4 12.2.2 Classification of Environmental Permits and Procedure for Permit 12-4 12.2.3 Gap from JICA Environmental guideline 12-5 12.2.4 Environmental Government Organization 12-8 12.2.5 Scope of Environmental Permit Controlled by DEC 12-8


vi

12.2.6 Land Ownership in PNG 12-8 12.2.7 The Organization of Land Ownership 12-9

12.3 Analysis of Alternatives 12-10 12.4 Scoping 12-11 12.5 Environmental Impact Assessment 12-14 12.5.1 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) 12-14 12.5.2 Aircraft Noise Prediction 12-16

12.6 Environmental Management Plan 12-18 12.7 Environmental Monitoring Plan 12-22 12.8 Framework 12-29 12.8.1 Responsibilities and Authorities for Implementation of Mitigation Measures 12-29 12.8.2 Coordination and Dialogue with stakeholders 12-29 12.8.3 Cost for Environmental Management Plan 12-29 12.8.4 Method of Payment 12-30

12.9 Stakeholder Meetings 12-32

SECTION 13: EFFECT OF FLOOD FROM ERAP RIVER 13.1 Surrounding Terrain and Previous Floods 13-1 13.2 Erap River Catchment Area and Rainfall 13-3 13.3 Current State of Embankment and its Effect 13-5 13.4 Proposed Embankment Construction (example) 13-7 Attachments Attachment A-1 Pavement Thickness Attachment A-2 STEP Rule Attachment A-3 Draft Terms of Reference Attachment A-4 Environmental Checklist Attachment A-5 Monitoring Form Attachment A-6 Conditions of Aircraft Noise Prediction


vii

List of Illustrations SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Figure 1.1-1 Map of Papua New Guinea 1-1 Figure 1.1-2 Location of Nadzab Airport, City of Lae and Highland Area 1-2 Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 1 of 4 1-5 Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 2 of 4 1-6 Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 3 of 4 1-7 Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 4 of 4 1-8 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT Figure 2.1-1 Provinces of Papua New Guinea 2-1 Figure 2.1-2 Historical Growth of GDP in PAPUA NEW GUINEA 2-3 Figure 2.1-3 Location of Oil an LNG Projects in Papua New Guinea 2-13 Figure 2.1-4 Schematic Diagram of PNG LNG Project 2-14 Figure 2.1-5 Location of MMJV Project Sites 2-16 Figure 2.1-6 Schematic Road Network in Papua New Guinea 2-21 Figure 2.1-7 Institutional Structure of Transport Sector 2-26 Figure 2.1-8 Institutional Structure of Air Transport Sector 2-27 Figure 2.1-9 Networks to/from Port Moresby 2-32 Figure 2.1-10 Shares of International Flights

to/from Jacksons/Port Moresby Airport 2-32 Figure 2.1-11 Domestic Air Network 2-34 Figure 2.1-12 Historical International Passenger Movements 2-36 Figure 2.1-13 Historical Domestic Passengers 2-36 Figure 2.1-14 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport 2-37 Figure 2.1-15 Location of Five Airports Improved

under CADIP Project 1 2-41 Figure 2.2-1 Map of Morobe Province 2-46 Figure 2.2-2 2012 Provincial Fiscal Capacity 2-47 Figure 2.3-1 Schematic Air Network of Nadzab/Lae Airport 2-49 SECTION 3: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND SOIL INVESTIGATION Figure 3.1-1 Survey Area 3-1 Figure 3.1-2 Topographic Map 3-6 Figure 3.2-1 Boring Location 3-8 Figure 3.2-2 Location of the tests by KOICA report 3-11


viii

Figure 3.2-3 Geological Map of the Investigation Area 3-12 Figure 3.2-4 A Cross-Sectional Profile 3-14 Figure 3.2-5 Bearing Layer Line of Raft Foundation 3-17 Figure 3.2-6 Bearing Layer Line of Raft Foundation with Soil Improvement 3-18 Figure 3.2-7 Bearing Layer Line of Pile Foundation 3-19 SECTION 4: AIR TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST Figure 4.2-1 Study Flow of Demand Forecast Items 4-2 Figure 4.3-1(a) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and Total GDP 4-4 Figure 4.3-1(b) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers

and Nonmineral GDP 4-4 Figure 4.3-1(c) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and Population 4-4 Figure 4.3-2 Comparison of GDP per Capita among Pacific Island Countries 4-5 Figure 4.3-3 Historical Trend of Actual and Assumed Total GDP 4-7 Figure 4.3-4 Historical Trend of Actual and Estimated Nonmineral GDP 4-8 Figure 4.4-1 Study Flow of Forecast for Domestic Passengers 4-9 Figure 4.4-2 Forecast ANG & APNG Passengers at Nadzab Airport (Total GDP) 4-10 Figure 4.4-3 Forecast ANG & APNG Passengers

at Nadzab Airport (Nonmineral GDP) 4-10 Figure 4.4-4 Domestic Air Passenger Forecast

in National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030 4-12 Figure 4.5-1 Study Flow of Peak Demand 4-15 Figure 4.5-2 Number of Flights by Time 4-15 Figure 4.6-1 Study Flow of Aircraft Demand 4-17 Figure 4.7-1 International Destination of Passenger Originated from Lae 4-21 Figure 4.7-2 Fluctuation of Potential International Passenger Originated from Lae 4-21 Figure 4.7-3 Study Flow of International Passengers (1) 4-22 Figure 4.7-4 Study Flow of International Passengers (2) 4-23 Figure 4.7-5 Forecast of Annual International Passengers at POM 4-23 Figure 4.8-1 Study Flow of Airport Access Traffic Forecast 4-28 SECTION 5: VERIFICATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND EXAMINATION OF FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Figure 5.2-1 General Dimension of B737-800 5-5 Figure 5.2-2 General Dimension of B787-8 5-6 Figure 5.2-3 General Dimension of B777-200 5-7 Figure 5.3-1 Layout of Nadzab Airport Facilities 5-26


ix

Figure 5.3.1-1 Typical Section of Existing Runway Pavement 5-27 Figure 5.3.1-2 Typical Section of Existing Main Apron Pavement 5-28 Figure 5.3.1-3 Obstacle Limitation Surfaces 5-31 Figure 5.3.2-1 Layout of Existing Utilities 5-41 Figure 5.4.1-1 Dimension of Turn Pad for B777-200 5-53 Figure 5.4.1-2 Landing Field Length for B737-800 5-54 Figure 5.4.1-3 Locations of TW-B and TW-C from Runway Thresholds 5-55 Figure 5.4.1-4 Image of Aircraft Landing from Runway 09 5-55 Figure 5.4.1-5 Image of Aircraft Taking-off from Runway 09 5-57 Figure 5.4.2-1 Examination of Taxiways “B” and “C” Fillet

for Boeing 737-800 based on Existing Fillet Dimension 5-60 Figure 5.4.2-2 Locations of Taxiways 5-61 Figure 5.4.3-1 Aircraft Parking/Taxiing Configuration on New Apron 5-65 Figure 5.4.7-1 Sight line check 5-70 Figure 5.4.7-2 Sight check for Circle Approaching Aircraft 5-71 Figure 5.4.12-1 Example Phasing of Embankment Improvement 5-75 Figure 5.5-1 Runway, Taxiways, Apron and AGL Rehabilitation: Option-1 5-78 Figure 5.5-2 Runway, Taxiways, Apron and AGL Rehabilitation: Option-2 5-79 SECTION 6: FORMULATION OF AIRPORT MASTER REHABILITATION PLAN Figure 6.1-1 Existing Separations between Facilities 6-1 Figure 6.1-2 Confirmation on Airside Separations

for Simultaneous Operation by B777-200 6-2 Figure 6.2-1 Alternative Location of New PTB Options 6-3 Figure 6.5-1 Short-term Nadzab Airport Master Rehabilitation Plan 6-7 Figure 6.5-2 Nadzab Airport Short-term Terminal Facilities

Master Rehabilitation Plan 6-8 SECTION 7: PRELIMINARY DESIGN Figure 7.2.1-1 Longitudinal Section for Runway 7-2 Figure 7.2.2-1 Cross Section for Single Cant and Center Crown of Runway 7-3 Figure 7.2.2-2 Typical Cross Section for Runway 7-4 Figure 7.2.2-3 TW-A Typical Cross Section Sta. 6+53.668 7-4 Figure 7.2.2-4 TW-C Typical Cross Section Sta. 1+00 7-4 Figure 7.2.3-1 Layout for Circulation Road and Carpark 7-6 Figure 7.2.3-2 Typical Cross Section for Perimeter Road and Fence 7-7 Figure 7.2.3-3 Perimeter Road and Fence Layout 7-7


x

Figure 7.2.4-1 Relationship between CBR Value and k Value 7-9 Figure 7.2.4-2 Typical Section of Existing Runway, Taxiway and Apron Pavement 7-10 Figure 7.2.4-3 Typical Section of Runway, Taxiway and Apron Pavement 7-10 Figure 7.2.6-1 180 Degrees Turn 7-12 Figure 7.2.6-2 Typical Cross Section of Runway 7-14 Figure 7.2.6-3 Typical Cross Section of Taxiway without Widening 7-14 Figure 7.2.6-4 Typical Cross Section of Taxiway with Widening 7-14 Figure 7.2.6-5 Day Work and Night Work Area for Runway and Taxiway 7-22 Figure 7.2.7-1 Location of Possible Aggregate Source 7-28 Figure 7.3.2-1 Layout Plan of Aeronautical Ground Lights 7-32 Figure 7.4-1 Location Plan 7-33 Figure 7.4-2 New PTB Ground Floor Plan 7-39 Figure 7.4-3 New PTB First Floor Plan 7-40 Figure 7.4-4 Passenger Access Flow _ Ground Floor 7-43 Figure 7.4-5 Passenger Access Flow _ Ground Floor 7-44 Figure 7.4-6 Scheme-A Exterior Image _ Landside 7-45 Figure 7.4-7 Scheme-A Exterior Image _ Airside 7-46 Figure 7.4-8 Scheme-A Exterior Image _ General 7-46 Figure 7.4-9 Scheme-A Elevations 7-47 Figure 7.4-10 Scheme-A Sections 7-48 Figure 7.4-11 Scheme-B Exterior Image _ Landside 7-49 Figure 7.4-12 Scheme-B Exterior Image _Airside 7-49 Figure 7.4-13 Scheme-B Exterior Image _General 7-50 Figure 7.4-14 Scheme-B Elevations 7-51 Figure 7.4-15 Scheme-B Sections 7-52 Figure 7.4-16 Scheme-C Exterior Image _ Landside 7-53 Figure 7.4-17 Scheme-C Exterior Image _ Airside 7-53 Figure 7.4-18 Scheme-C Exterior Image _ General 7-54 Figure 7.4-19 Scheme-C Elevations 7-55 Figure 7.4-20 Scheme-C Sections 7-56 Figure 7.4-21 PTB Power Feed-in Diagram 7-62 Figure 7.4-22 415V Main Feeder System Flow Diagram 7-63 Figure 7.4-23 Telephone System Flow Diagram 7-64 Figure 7.4-24 Fire Alarm System Flow Diagram 7-65 Figure 7.4-25 CCTV System Flow Diagram 7-66 Figure 7.4-26 LAN System Flow Diagram 7-67 Figure 7.4-27 Public Address System Flow Diagram 7-68


xi

Figure 7.4-28 TV System Flow Diagram 7-68 Figure 7.4-29 PTB HVAC system 7-69 Figure 7.4-30 Renovation Area 7-71 Figure 7.4-31 Renovated Cargo Terminal 7-72 Figure 7.4-32 Air Conditioning and Ventilation Flow 7-73 Figure 7.4-33 Administration Building Plan 7-74 Figure 7.4-34 Administration Building Elevations・Sections 7-75 Figure 7.4-35 Air Conditioning System Flow Diagram 7-76 Figure 7.4-36 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station Plans (Above:1st floor, Below: Ground floor) 7-78 Figure 7.4-37 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station Elevations 7-79 Figure 7.4-38 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station Sections 7-79 Figure 7.4-39 Air Conditioning System Flow Diagram 7-80 Figure 7.4-40 Control Tower Power Feed-in Diagram 7-82 Figure 7.4-41 Substation Plan (For the PTB) 7-84 Figure 7.4-42 Substation Plan (For the Control Tower) 7-84 Figure 7.4-43 Substation Elevation/Sections (For the PTB) 7-85 Figure 7.4-44 Air Conditioning and Ventilation Flow 7-86 Figure 7.5-1 Water Supply System 7-88 Figure 7.5-2 Fire Protection Pump System 7-89 Figure 7.5-3 Waste Water Treatment System 7-90 Figure 7.5-4 Layout Plan for Electrical Works 7-91 Figure 7.5-5 Layout Plan for Water 7-92 Figure 7.5-6 External Cabling System Flow Diagram 7-93 Figure 7.6-1 Low-E Glass Diagram 7-94 Figure 7.6-2 Rain Water Piping System 7-96 SECTION 8: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Figure 8.1-1 Proposed General Project Implementation Scheme

for the Project 8-1 Figure 8.2-1 Project Implementation Schedule 8-11 SECTION 9: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION Figure 9.1-1 CADIP Implementation Organization of NAC as of 2011-2013 9-2 Figure 9.2-1 Proposed PIU for Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project 9-3 SECTION 10: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AFTER IMPLEMENTATION Figure 10.1-1 General Organizational Structure of NAC as of 2011-2013 10-2


xii

Figure 10.3-1 Revenues of NAC 10-5 Figure 10.3-2 NAC’s Expenses by Item 10-5 Figure 10.5-1 Nadzab Airport Operations Structure 2011-2013 10-8 SECTION 11: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Figure 11.1-1 With/Without Domestic Air Passenger Traffic Demand

for Benefits Estimate 11-3 SECTION 12: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION Figure 12.1 Annual Average Temperature 12-2 Figure 12.2 Annual Average Rainfall 12-2 Figure 12.3 Land use in the vicinity of Nadzab airport 12-3 Figure 12.4 Flowchart of Environmental Permits (Level 1 to Level 3) 12-6 Figure 12.5 Flowchart of Environmental Permits (Level 2) 12-7 Figure 12.6 Flowchart of Environmental Permits (Level 3) 12-7 Figure 12.7 Organization Chart of DEC 12-8 Figure 12.8 Contour on Aircraft Noise in 2014, 2026 and 2031 12-17 Figure 12.9 Stakeholder Meetings 12-34 SECTION 13: FLOOD FROM ERAP RIVER Figure 13.1-1 The State of the River Channel and the Airport 13-2 Figure 13.2-1 Changes in Rainfall since 2009 13-3 Figure 13.2-2 Watershed of the Erap River system 13-4 Figure 13.3-1 Typical Cross Section of the Current Embankment 13-5 Figure 13.4-1 Example Phasing of Embankment Improvement 13-7 Figure 13.4-2 Typical Cross-Section in the 1st Phase (Improvement；1,300m) 13-9 Figure 13.4-3 Typical Cross-Section in the 2nd Phase-a, b

and 3rd Phase-a, b (Alternative of 3rd Phase-a) 13-9


xiii

List of Tabulations SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Table 1.4-1 Work Schedule 1-10 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT Table 2.1-1 Regions and Provinces of Papua New Guinea 2-1 Table 2.1-2 Population of Provinces in Papua New Guinea 2-2 Table 2.1-3 Historical Growth of Typical GDP, GDP per Capita and Population 2-3 Table 2.1-4 Sectoral GDP Growth Rates and Share 2-5 Table 2.1-5 IMF Prospect on Annual Growth Rates

of Real GDP of Papua New Guinea 2-8 Table 2.1-6 Expected Average Annual Growth Rates of Papua New Guinea Vision 2050 2-9 Table 2.1-7.a 2015 to 2018 Economic Outlook presented by Minister of Finance 2-11 Table 2.1-7b Central Government Debts (2015 National Budget Volume 1) 2-12 Table 2.1-7c Debt Sustainability Measures (2015 National Budget Volume 1) 2-12 Table 2.1-8 Contribution of Mineral Sector to Balance of Payment 2-13 Table 2.1-9 Average Expenditure by Purpose of Visit 2-18 Table 2.1-10 Traffic through PNGPCL Declared Ports 2-22 Table 2.1-11 Breakdown of Main Commodity Groups

in Export/Import of PAPUA NEW GUINEA 2-23 Table 2.1-12 Cargo Revenue Tonnages at Major Ports of Lae,

Port Moresby and Others (2007 to 2009) 2-25 Table 2.1-13 Summary of ICAO Recognized Airports 2-30 Table 2.1-14 Air Traffic at Main Airports 2-31 Table 2.1-15 Historical International Passengers 2-36 Table 2.1-16 Historical Domestic Passenger Movements 2-36 Table 2.1-17 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab 2-37 Table 2.1-18 Investment Program and Investment Plan for Project 1 2-41 Table 2.1-19 Projected Funding Requirements

for National Airports (up to CADIP Project 2) 2-42 Table 2.1-20 Summary of CNS/ATM Modernization Projects

and Activities at Nadzab Airport as of May 2014 2-44 SECTION 3: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND SOIL INVESTIGATION Table3.1-1 Location of Reference Points 3-5 Table3.1-2 Location of Bench Marks 3-5 Table3.2-1 Content of Soil Investigation 3-7


xiv

Table3.2-2 Coordinates and Elevation of boreholes 3-8 Table 3.2-3 Applied Standards for Boring Tests 3-9 Table 3.2-4 Applied Standards for Laboratory Tests 3-10 Table3.2-5 Quantities of the work by KOICA 3-11 Table 3.2-6 Subsoil Configurations 3-13 Table 3.2-7 Summary of laboratory test 3-16 Table 3.2-8 Soil Parameter 3-17 Table 3.2-9 Applicable machines for CDM 3-18 Table 3.2-10 Height of excavation and its gradient as applied to the open cut method 3-19 SECTION 4: AIR TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST Table 4.3-1 Socio-economic Indices and Nadzab Domestic

Passenger Movement Record 4-3 Table 4.3-2 Correllation Matrix between Nadzab Domestic

Passengers and GDP/Population 4-5 Table 4.3-3 Anticipated Future GDP Growth Rates

by International Organizations and GPNG 4-6 Table 4.3-4 Assumed Future Total GDP Growth Rates 4-6 Table 4.3-5 IMF/GPNG Estimates and Adopted Nonmineral GDP Growth Rates 4-8 Table 4.4-1 Forecasting Models Tested for Nadzab Airport Case (Total GDP) 4-9 Table 4.4-2 Forecasting Models Tested for Nadzab Airport Case (Nonmineral GDP) 4-10 Table 4.4-3 Share of Each Airline at Nadzab Airport 4-11 Table 4.4-4 Comparison of Nadzab Airport Domestic Passengers Forecast Results 4-11 Table 4.4-5 Summary of Forecasting Model, Parameter and Result 4-13 Table 4.5-1 Design Day Ratio 4-15 Table 4.5-2 Peak Demand 4-16 Table 4.6-1 Airline Share 4-17 Table 4.6-2 Estimated Domestic Passengers by Airline 4-17 Table 4.6-3 Route Share 4-18 Table 4.6-4 Future Aircraft and Load Factor 4-18 Table 4.6-5 Summary Forecasts of Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements 4-18 Table 4.6-6 Calculation of Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements 4-19 Table 4.6-7 Forecast Peak-hour Domestic Aircraft Movements 4-20 Table 4.7-1 Estimate of Potential Daily Int’l Passengers

(Case 1: Data provided by Air Niugini) 4-22 Table 4.7-2 Estimate of Potential Daily Int’l Passengers

(Case 2: Interview Survey at Port Moresby) 4-24


xv

Table 4.7-3 Daily International Departing Passengers and Aircraft Movements (Nadzab-Brisbane) 4-25

Table 4.7-4 Daily International Departing Passengers and Aircraft Movements (Nadzab-Cairns) 4-25

Table 4.7-5 Departure Flights in a Week 4-26 Table 4.7-6 Estimated Design Day/Annual International Passengers 4-27 Table 4.8-1 Well-wisher Ratio 4-28 Table 4.8-2 Airport Staff Ratio 4-28 Table 4.8-3 Modal Split for Air Passengers and Well-wisher 4-29 Table 4.8-4 Modal Split for Airport Staff 4-29 Table 4.8-5 Number of Users per Vehicle 4-29 Table 4.8-6 Estimated Traffic Volume 4-30 Table 4.9-1 Relation between Air Passenger and Air Cargo 4-31 Table 4.9-2 Annual Air Cargo Demand 4-32 Table 4.10-1 Summary for Future Demand 4-33 SECTION 5: VERIFICATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND EXAMINATION OF FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Table 5.2-1 Aerodrome Reference Code defined in ICAO Annexn14 5-8 Table 5.2-2 Aerodrome Reference Code applicable to Nadzab/Lae Airport 5-8 Table5.2-2-2 Occurrences of Visibility Conditions (September 2013 to August 2014) 5-9 Table 5.2-3 Passenger Terminal Levels of Service 5-10 Table 5.2-4 Level of Service Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities 5-11 Table 5.2-5 Assumed Domestic and International Peak-hour Passenger Movements 5-12 Table 5.2-6 Domestic and International Peak-hour Aircraft Arrivals 5-13 Table 5.2-7 Annual Cargo Volume 5-13 Table 5.2-8 Summary Requirements of Aircraft Parking Stands 5-14 Table 5.2-9 Summary Facility Requirements for New PTB (Target year 2026) 5-16 Table 5.2-10 Summary Facility Requirements for New PTB (Target year 2031) 5-17 Table 5.2-11 Reference on the floor area requirements

for PTB international flight facilities 2026 and 2031 (IATA ADRM) 5-18 Table 5.2-12 Reference on the floor area requirements

for PTB domestic flight facilities 2026 (IATA ADRM) 5-19 Table 5.2-13 Reference on the floor area requirements

for PTB domestic flight facilities 2031 (IATA ADRM) 5-20 Table 5.2-14 Computation of Facility Requirement of Cargo Terminal 5-22


xvi

Table 5.2-15 AeroDrome Category for Rescue and Fire Fighting 5-24 Table 5.3-1 Basic Information of Airside facilities 5-25 Table 5.3.1-1 Dimension and Slopes of Obstacle Limitation Surfaces 5-30 Table 5.3-2 Existing Conditions of AGL at Nadzab Airport 5-44 Table 5.4.1-1 Correction of Runway Length 5-48 Table 5.4.1-2 Assumed Operating Empty Weight plus Payload 5-49 Table 5.4.1-3 Result of Range-Payload Examination 5-49 Table 5.4.1-4 Runway Width Requirement 5-52 Table 5.4.1-5 Runway Rehabilitation Measures 5-58 Table 5.4.2-1 Taxiway Width Requirement 5-59 Table 5.4.2-2 Minimum Clearance Distance of Outer Main Wheel to Taxiway Edge 5-59 Table 5.4.2-3 Taxiway Rehabilitation Measures 5-62 Table 5.4.3-1 Apron Development/Rehabilitation Measures 5-66 Table 5.4.11-1 Estimated Aircraft Fuel Consumption and Storage Capacity (2026) 5-74 Table 5.4.11-2 Estimated Aircraft Fuel Consumption and Storage Capacity (2031) 5-74 Table 5.5-1 Matrix showing Options of

Runway/Taxiways/Aprons/AGL/Related Facilities 5-77 Table 5.5-2 Summary Result of Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate

(Runway/Taxiway/Apron/AGL/Related Facilities) 5-80 Table 5.5-3 Proposed Project Components and Preliminary Construction Cost 5-83 SECTION 6: FORMULATION OF AIRPORT MASTER REHABILITATION PLAN Table 6.3-1 Comparison of Two New PTB Location Options 6-4 SECTION 7: PRELIMINARY DESIGN Table 7.2.2-1 Comparison of Single Cant and Center Crown Slope 7-3 Table 7.2.3-1 Design Criteria for a Taxiway 7-5 Table 7.2.4-1 Forecasted Daily Aircraft Movements 7-7 Table 7.2.4-2 Estimated Aircraft Movements during Design Period 7-8 Table 7.2.4-3 Subgrade CBR Value 7-8 Table 7.2.5-1 Summary of Cost Reduction 7-11 Table 7.2.6-1 Characteristics of Expected Aircraft to be used during Construction 7-12 Table 7.2.6-2 Required Take-Off Runway Length 7-12 Table 7.2.6-3 Minimum Pavement Width for 180 Degree Turn 7-13 Table 7.2.6-4 Size of Fokker and DC 9-3 7-13 Table 7.2.6-5 Comparison of Runway Construction Options 7-13 Table 7.2.6-6 Typical Night Work Procedure of Asphalt Overlay Work 7-17


xvii

Table 7.2.6-7 List of Expected Construction Equipment for Asphalt Pavement Work 7-18 Table 7.2.6-8 Assumed Machinery for Cement Concrete Pavement Work 7-19 Table 7.2.6-9 Typical Daily Work Procedure of Cement Concrete Pavement 7-20 Table 7.2.6-10 Construction Capacity 7-23 Table 7.2.6-11 Summary of Construction Quantities 7-23 Table 7.2.6-12 Historical Monthly Precipitation

and Number of Days more than 10mm per day 7-25 Table 7.2.6-13 Calendar Day / Workable Day 7-25 Table 7.2.6-14 Preliminary Construction Schedule for Civil Works 7-26 Table 7.2.7-1 Possible Aggregate Suppliers 7-27 Table 7.2.7-2 Summary of Findings 7-28 Table 7.3.1-1 Summary Scope of AGL Rehabilitation for Nadzab Airport 7-29 Table 7.3.2-1 General Requirements of Aeronautical Ground Lights 7-30 Table 7.4.5-1 Control Tower Renovation Scope Summary 7-81 Table 7.7-1 Result of the Cost Reduction 7-97

Table 7.7-2 Construction Cost Estimate in Kina 7-98 Table 7.8-1 Construction Schedule 7-101 SECTION 8: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Table 8.1-1 Expected Foreign Currency Ratio in Civil Works Component 8-5 Table 8.1-2 Goods and Service in Architectural Works expected to be Japanese origin 8-7 Table 8.1-3 Assumed Japan Origin of AGL Works 8-8 Table 8.1-4 Total Amount and Share of Japan Origin 8-9 Table 8.3-1 Estimated Total Construction Cost 8-13 Table 8.3-2 Assumed Billing Rates and Estimated Staff-months

for Consulting Services 8-13 Table 8.3-2 Estimated Total Project Cost for Rehabilitation of Nadzab Airport 8-15 SECTION 10: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AFTER IMPLEMENTATION Table 10.2-1 NAC Staff Force 10-3 Table 10.3-1 Profit and Loss of NAC 10-4 Table 10.3-2 Estimated Cash Flow of NAC (‘1000 PGK) 10-6 Table 10.4-1 Balance Sheet of NAC as of 31 December 2013 10-7 Table 10.5-1 Proposed Staff Force Strengthening for Nadzab

as International Alternate Airport 10-11


xviii

SECTION 11: ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Table 11.1-1 Forecast Future Air Traffic Demand 11-3 Table 11.1-2 Comparison of Annual Air Traffic Demand

between Without Project Case and With Project Case 11-4 Table 11.1-3 Comparison of Annual Aircraft Movements by Aircraft Type

between Without Project Case and With Project Case 11-5 Table 11.1-4 Comparison of Annual Air Passengers by Nationality

between Without Project Case and With Project Case 11-6 Table 11.1-5 Actual Lending Rate in Papua New Guinea 11-7 Table 11.2-1 Project Implementation Costs for Economic Analysis 11-8 Table 11.2-2 Actual Standard Conversion Factor (SCF) 11-8 Table 11.2-3 NAC - Staff Listing by Division/Airport as of October 2014 11-9 Table 11.2-4 NAC - Budget for The Year 2014 11-10 Table 11.2-5 Comparison of Area between Existing Facilities

and New Facilities 11-11 Table 11.2-6 Maintenance Cost of Existing Facilities 11-12 Table 11.2-7 Maintenance Cost of New Facilities 11-12 Table 11.2-8 Population Ratio of Lae District to Morobe Region (2011) 11-13 Table 11.2-9 Average Domestic Air Fare 11-13 Table 11.2-10 Purpose of Visitors to Lae Area 11-14 Table 11.2-11 Average Consumption by Foreign Visitor 11-15 Table 11.2-12 Airport Charges (NAC) 11-15 Table 11.2-13 Average Domestic Air Cargo Fee 11-16 Table 11.2-14 Average International Air Cargo Fee 11-16 Table 11.2-15 Assumption of Divert Flights from Port Moresby 11-17 Table 11.2-16 Result of Economic Analysis 11-17 Table 11.2-17 EIRR Calculation Sheet 11-18 Table 11.2-18 Sensitivity Analysis of EIRR 11-19 Table 11.3-1 Project Implementation Costs for Financial Analysis 11-20 Table 11.3-2 MTOW and ALC by Aircraft Type 11-21 Table 11.3-3 Result of Financial Analysis 11-22 Table 11.3-4 FIRR Calculation Sheet 11-23 Table 11.4-1 Precondition of JPY Loan (JICA STEP Loan） 11-24 Table 11.4-2 Indicative Rates used in Prime Cost Method 11-24 Table 11.4-3 Statement of Profit and Loss of Nadzab/Lae Airport 11-25


xix

Table 11.4-4 Statement on The Receipt and Disbursement of Fund and Free Cash Flow in Nadzab/Lae Airport 11-27

Table 11.4-5 Statement on The Receipt and Disbursement of Fund and Free Cash Flow in Nadzab/Lae Airport

( Reference : Excluding Investment Cost from NAC Expenditure) 11-28

SECTION 12: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATION

Table 12.1 Laws and Regulations 12-4

Table 12.2 Scoping Result 12-11 Table 12.3 TOR of Environmental Survey (draft) 12-13 Table 12.4 IEE Result 12-14 Table 12.5 Ambient noise standard coming from airplanes in Japan 12-16 Table 12.6 Environmental Management Plan (Construction Phase) 12-19 Table 12.7 Environmental Management Plan (Operation Phase) 12-21 Table 12.8 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Construction Phase) 12-23 Table 12.9 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Operation Phase) 12-26 Table 12.10 Environmental Monitoring Cost (Unit Price) 12-28 Table 12.11 Summary of Environmental Management Costs 12-31 Table 12.12 Outline of Stakeholder Meetings 12-33

SECTION 13: FLOOD FROM ERAP RIVER Table 13.4.1 The Rough Construction Cost for Each Phase 13-9


I

List of Abbreviations

A

AAGR Average Annual Growth Rate

ACC Area Control Center

ACN Aircraft Classification Number

ADB Asian Development Bank

ADRM Airport Development Reference Manual

ADS-B Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast

AFTN Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network

A/G Air to Ground

AGL Aeronautical Ground Light

AHU Air-Handling Units

AIS Aeronautical Information Service

AIC Accident Investigation Commission

AIP Aeronautical Information Publication

AMHS ATS Message Handling System

ANG Air Niugini

ANS Air Navigation Service

APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation

APNG Airline PNG

AR Autonomous Region

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATD Air Transport Division

ATM Air Traffic Management

ATS Air Traffic Service

AUSAID Australian Agency for International Development

AWOS Automated Weather Observing System


II

B

BCR or B/C Benefit Cost Ratio

BHS Baggage Handling System

BMS Building Management System

BNE Brisbane

BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand

C

CAA Civil Aviation Authority

CAD Computer Aided Design

CADIP Civil Aviation Development Investment Program

CASA Civil Aviation Safety Authority

CAT Category

CBR California Bearing Ratio

CCR Constant Current Regulator

CCTV Closed Circuit Television

CIQ Customs, Immigration, Quarantine

CNS Cairns

CNS/ATM Communication, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management

COD Chemical Oxygen Demand

CSO Community Service Obligation

CTB Cargo Terminal Building

D

D/E Debt/Equity

DEC Department of Environment and Conservation

DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

DLPP Department of Lands and Physical Planning (DLPP)

DME Distance Measuring Equipment

DPI Department of Primary Industry


III

DSCR Debt Service Coverage Ratio

DOT Department of Transport

DOW Department of Works

DVOR Doppler Type VHF Omni-directional Radio Range

E

e.g. For example

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return

EIS Environmental Impact Statement

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMoP Environmental Monitoring Program

E/N Exchange of Note

ENPV Economic Net Present Value

F

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAARFIELD FAA Rigid and Flexible Iterative Elastic Layered Design

FCU Fan Coil Unit

FIDS Flight Information Display System

FIR Flight Information Region

FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return

FNPV Financial Net Present Value

FS or F/S Feasibility Study

G

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GIS Geographic Information System

GJPY Government of Japan

GPNG Government of Papua New Guinea

GRDP Gross Regional Domestic Product


IV

GS Glide Slope

GST Goods and Services Tax

H

HF High Frequency

HQ Headquarter

HVJV Hidden Valley Mine Joint Venture

I

IAS Indicated Air Speed

IATA International Air Transportation Association

ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization

ICB International Competitive Bidding

ICCC Independent Consumer and Competition Commission

IEEC Initial Environmental Examination Checklist

IEER Initial Environmental Examination Report

IFR Instrument Flight Rule

ILS Instrument Landing System

IMF International Monetary Fund

ITB Invitation to Bid

J

JCAB Japan Civil Aviation Bureau

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

JPY Japanese Yen

K

KOICA Korea International Cooperation Agency

L

LAN Local Area Network

LCC Low Cost Carriers

LCCI Lae Chamber of Commerce Inc.


V

Lden Level day-evening-night

LED Light Emitting Diode

LLCR Loan Life Coverage Ratio

LLZ Localizer

LNG Liquefied Natural Gas

LTIP CAA Infrastructure Investment Plan, Long Term (2010-2030)

LV Low Voltage

M

MDA Minimum Descent Altitude

MEJV Morobe Exploration Joint Venture

MET Meteorological Equipment

METAR Regular Airport Weather Report

MLAT Multilateration

MMJV Morobe Mining Joint Venture

MSL Mean Sea Level

M/P Master Plan

MT Metric Ton

MTDP Medium-term Development Plan 2011-2015

MTTP Medium Term Transport Plan

N

NAC National Airports Corporation

NASMP National Airports Strategic Management Plan

NAVAID(s) Navigation Aid (s)

NCA North Coast Aviation

NCD National Capital District

NDB Non-Directional Beacon

NEC National Executive Council

NGO Non-Governmental Organization


VI

NM Nautical Mile (1852m)

NMSA National Maritime Safety Authority

NOTAM Notice to Airmen

NPC National Planning Committee

NPV Net Present Value

NRA National Roads Authority

NRSC National Road Safety Council

NSO National Statistics Office

NTS National Transport Strategy

O

ODA Official Development Assistance

OEW Operating Empty Weight

OJT On-the-job training

OLS Obstacle Limitation Surface

O/M Operation and Maintenance

P

PABX Private Automatic Branch Exchange

PALS Precision Approach Lighting System

PAMAS PNG ADS-B, MLAT and ATM System

PANS Procedures for Air Navigation Services

PANS/OPS PANS-Aircraft Operations

PAPI Precision Approach Path Indicator

PAU Primary Air-Handling Units

PAX Passenger

PBB Passenger Boarding Bridge

PBN Performance Based Navigation


VII

PC Personnel Computer

PCCP Portland Cement Concrete Pavement

PCN Pavement Classification Number

PGK Papua New Guinean Kina

PIRR Project Internal Rate of Return

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMIA Port Moresby International Airport

PMO Project Management Office

PMV Public Motor Vehicle

PNG Papua New Guinea

PNGASL PNG Air Services Limited

PNGDSP National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

PNG Vision 2050 Papua New Guinea Vision 2050

POM Port Moresby

PPP Public Private Partnership

PSFC Passenger Service Facility Charge

PTB Passenger Terminal Building

Q

QNH Altimeter sub-scale setting to obtain elevation when on the ground

QFE Atmospheric pressure at aerodrome elevation

R

RIV Rapid Intervention Vehicle

REDL Runway Edge Light

RENL Runway End Light

RESA Runway End Safety Area

RIV Rapid Intervention Vehicle

RNAV Area Navigation

ROW Right Of Way


VIII

RTHL Runway Threshold Light

RVR Runway Visual Range

R/W or RWY Runway

RX Receiver

S

SALS Simplified Approach Lighting System

SCF Standard Conversion Factor

SOE State Owned Enterprises

SPT Standard Penetration Test

STAR Standard Terminal Approach Route

STEP Special Terms for Economic Partnership

STP Sewage Treatment Plant

T

TA Travel Air

T-DME Terminal DME

TEDL Taxiway Edge Light

TFC Terminal Facility Charge

TIEZA Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority

TMA Terminal Control Area

TOR Terms of Reference

TPA Tourism Promotion Authority

TRCV Transceiver

TSSP Transport Sector Support Program

T/W or TWY Taxiway

TX Transmitter

TXGL Taxiway Guidance Light

U

UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply


IX

UTC Universal Time Coordinated

V

VCS Voice Communication System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VHF Very High Frequency Range

VIP Very Important Person

VOR VHF Omni-directional Radio Range

VSAT Very Small Aperture Terminal

W

WB World Bank

WBRL Wing Bar Light

WC Working Capital

WD Wind Direction

WDPS Weather Data Processing System

WDIL Wing Direction Indicator Light

WECPNL Weighted Equivalent Continuous Perceived Noise Level

WGJV Wafi-Golpu Joint Venture

WGS84 World Geodetic System-84

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION


1-1

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

Independent State of Papua New Guinea (hereinafter referred to as “Papua New Guinea”), with its population of 7.17 million in 2012, consists of more than 600 islands including eastern half of New Guinea Island (main island) as well as Islands of Bismarck, New Britain, Louisilade, etc. In addition, the main island has a complex chain of mountain ranges consisting of Bismarck and Owen Stanley Ranges (highest elevation 3000m to 4000m), which divide the main island to the north and south. Surface of the country other than mountain is covered by deep rain forest. Due to the harsh topographic conditions, there are still several missing links in the trunk line road network in Papua New Guinea. Therefore, the air transport plays its vital role in transportation of people in Papua New Guinea.

The city of Lae (population in 2011 Census was about 149 thousand), the second largest city after the capital city of Port Moresby (population in 2011 Census was about 364 thousand), has the port of Lae which handles the largest volume of cargo in Papua New Guinea. Lae is connected by the Highland Highway with Highland area where abundant agricultural products are grown and several natural resource developments are ongoing. Lae is recognized as one of the industrial and logistic centers in Papua New Guinea, but it is connected with Port Moresby only by the air and sea.

Figure 1.1-1 Map of Papua New Guinea

Nadzab Airport, located approximately 35km to the west-north-west of Lae, is the second largest airport in PNG, having 2438-m long runway. Nadzab Airport handled approximately 300 thousand domestic passengers in 2012, and its average annual growth rate from 2008 to 2012 reached 13%. However, Nadzab Airport has several deficiencies as listed below:


1-2

Existing runway width of 30m is not sufficient to accommodate B737 type aircraft; Pavement strength of the runway, taxiway and apron is not sufficient to accommodate B737 type

aircraft; The passenger terminal building is outdated and short of capacity.

Therefore, it is not capable of accommodating the increasing air traffic demand properly and efficiently.

Figure 1.1-2 Location of Nadzab Airport, City of Lae and Highland Area

Under such circumstance, the Government of Papua New Guinea has been considering a possibility to borrow Yen Loan for rehabilitation of Nadzab Airport, and JICA decided to implement the Preparatory Survey on the Project for Nadzab (Lae) Airport Rehabilitation in Papua New Guinea (hereinafter referred to as the “Preparatory Survey”). JAC/AZS/OC Joint Venture, consisting of following three consulting firms, has been entrusted by JICA to carry out the Preparatory Study as the Survey Team:

Japan Airport Consultants, Inc. (JAC) as the lead firm of JV; Azusa Sekkei Co., Ltd. (AZS) as a member firm of JV; and Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. (OC) as a member firm of JV.

It should be clearly understood that, although results of the Preparatory Survey will be used as the basis for subsequent project appraisal by JICA, the scope of the Project covered by Yen Loan is to be finally decided during the course of the appraisal and shall not necessarily be the same as the results of the Preparatory Survey. It should also be so understood that the decision to implement the Project under JICA Yen Loan will be made by way of bilateral agreement between the Government of Japan and the Government of Papua New Guinea.

City of Lae

Nadzab Airport

Highland Highway

Eastern Highland


1-3

1.2 Preparatory Survey Organization

Preparatory Survey Team dispatched by JICA consists of following members: 1) Team Leader/Airport Planner: Mr. Teruo HANADA, JAC 2) Deputy Team Leader/Civil Engineer 1: Mr. Nobuyoshi ONO, JAC 3) Architect 1: Mr. Shinichiro KADOYA, AZS 4) Architect 2: , Mr. Masahide KUNIYOSHI, AZS 5) Civil Engineer 2: Jun YAMAUCHI, OC 6) Mechanical & Electrical Engineer: Asao TAGUCHI, AZS 7) CNS/ATM & AGL Engineer: Mr. Norihito FUKUHARA, JAC 8) Air Traffic Forecaster: Mr. Hidetoshi SUGIURA, OC 9) Construction Planning/Cost Estimate: Hideki AKIEDA, AZS 10) Economic and Financial Analysis: Mr. Azuma FURUSE, JAC 11) Environmental and Social Considerations: Mr. Yuki MORINAGA, OC 12) Topographic, Geotechnical and Pavement Surveys: Takafumi KAMEDA, OC.

Organizational structure of the Preparatory Survey Team is as shown below.

Civil Engineering Group Building Planning Group

Civil Engineer 1: Nobuyoshi OONO

Civil Engineer 2: Jun YAMAUCHI

Architect 1: Shinichiro KADOYA

Architect 2：Masahide KUNIYOSHI

Mechanical/Electrical: Asao TAGUCHI

Surveys: Takafumi KAMEDA

Traffic Demand Forecast & Economic and Financial Analysis

Mr. Hidetoshi SUGIURAMr. Azuma FURUSE

CNS/ATM & AGL: Norihito FUKUHARA

Construction Plan/Cost Estimate:Hideki AKIEDA

Environmental & Social Consideration:

Yuki MORINAGA

Management GroupTeruo HANADANobuyoshi ONO


1-4

1.3 Scope of Work

The scope of the Preparatory Survey consists of the following 23 items:

(1) Data Collection and Analysis (2) Preparation of Questionnaire (3) Examination of Methodology, Schedule and Processes (4) Preparation of Inception Report (5) Discussion on Inception Report (6) Examination of Present Condition (7) Surveys (8) Air Traffic Demand Forecast (9) Verification of Existing Facilities and Examination of Facility Requirements

(10) Formulation of Airport Master Development Plan (11) Preparation of Interim Report (12) Discussion on Interim Report (13) Preliminary Design (14) Preliminary Examination of Work Execution Plan and Project Implementation Plan (15) Preliminary Project Cost Estimate (16) Project Implementation Organization (17) Operation and Maintenance after Project Implementation (18) Economic and Financial Analysis and Examination of Operation/Effect Indicators (19) Examination on Environmental and Social Consideration (20) Examination on Consulting Services (21) Preparation and Discussion of Draft Final Report (22) Preparation of Final Report

Figure 1.3-1 shows the procedures to complete the work.


1-5

(１) Data Collection and Analysis (2) Preparation of Questionnaire(3) Examination of Methodology, Schedule

and Process

（4） Preparation of Inception Report

（5） Discussion on Inception Report

（6） Examination of Present Condition

　　　　　　　　Overall-　Socio-economic Indices-　Structure of Economy-　Natural Resources Development-　Tourism Development-　Japanese Companies in PNG

　　　　　　Aviation Sector-　Organization, Policy & Finance-　Operating Airlines -　International & Domestic Air Network-　Air Transport Statistics-　Air Transport Development Projects

　　　　　　　Nadzab Airport-　Passenger, Cargo Aircraft Movements-　Airport Facilities-　Land Use of Surrounding Area-　Flooding of Erap River-　Related Development under CADIP-　Weather Conditions (Low Visibility)

（7） Surveys

Topographic & Geological Survey-　Plane Table Survey (40ha）-　Boring and Laboratory Testing

　　　　　Pavement Survey-　Thickness of Existing Pavements-　Marshall Stability of Existing Asphalt Pavement Layers-　Subgrade CBR (RWY Extension Area)

　　　　　Interview Survey-　International Passengers (Port Moresby)-　Domestic Passengers (Nadzab and Port Moresby)　　（including airport access transportation)-　Airlines-　LNG Project Developers

（8） Air Traffic Demand Forecast (2021 to 2031)

Regression Analysis (International & Domestic Passengers at PNG or Port Moresby – GDP)

Share of Nadzab Airport Passengers in Entire PNG

Passenger Traffic Forecasting Model with GDP

Assumption of Natural Resource Development

Scenarios

PNG Annual Passenger Traffic Demand Forecast

　　　 Assumptions-　Future Airlines Fleet Plan-　Average Load Factor

Annual Aircraft Movement Forecast

-　Monthly/Daily/Hourly Peak Factors-　Share of Access Transportation, Average Number of Passengers　（Hotel & Public Buses, Other Cars)

Peak-day and Peak-hour Passenger/Aircraft Movements and Number of Access Vehicles at Nadzab Airport

Discussion

Annual Passenger Demand Forecast at Nadzab

Intention of Local Business Leaders and Airlines on

International Operations at Nadzab

-　Base Case　　（PNG LNG)　-　High Case　　（New Project)

Future GDP Growth (Base and High Cases)

Future GDP Growth Estimate by IMF

Annual Passenger Traffic Demand at Nadzab (Base and High Cases)

Assumption of Weekly International Flight Frequency/Aircraft Type/Passengers

Annual Air Cargo Demand Forecast at Nadzab

　　　　　　　　　　　　　Actual Data Examination　　　-　Air Traffic at Nadzab Airport （to be collected at Nadzab)　　　-　Air Traffic at Port Moresby　　　-　Estimate of Passenger and Cargo Traffic Data in PNG　　　-　Share of Lae Oriented/Destined International Passengers (based on the passenger interview survey）　　　-　Share of Lae-Cairns Passengers （ditto）　　　-　Actual and Future-estimated GDP　　　-　Aircraft Fleet Plan （based on the airlines interview survey）　　　-　Potential Passenger Movements Generated by LNG Project （based on the interview survey of Developers）

Note. 1　Work in Japan Note 2　Work in PNG Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 1 of 4


1-6

（9） Verification of Existing Facilities and Examination of Facility Requirements

　　　Evaluation of Existing Facilities-　Dimensions, Floor Spaces, etc.-　Structural Soundness- Mechanical/Electrical Installations-　Level of Deterioration

　　　　　Planning Policy Setting-　Target of Nadzab Airport Development-　Target Year for Development- Future Air Network of Nadzab

　　　　　　　 Listing of Major Project ComponentsA) Passenger Terminal: Choice of Single/One and Half Storey, List of Terminal EquipmentB) Road and Car Park: No. of Lanes, Parking Spaces, Associated Facilities including DrainageC) Utilities: Capacity of Potable Water, Sewage Treatment, Electrical Power SupplyD) Cargo Terminal: Utilization of Existing Passenger Terminal, List of Security EquipmentE) Runway: Length, Width, Pavement Strength (Design Aircraft)F) Taxiways: Width, Fillet, Pavement StrengthG) Aircraft Parking Apron: Dimension, Pavement Strength, Pavement Type of New ApronH) CNS/ATM, AGL: Required Category of ILS (including LLZ only) Note 1, Renewal of CommunicationsI) ATC Tower, RFF Note 2: Utilization of Existing Buildings, Improvement of Utilities Note 1. ILS: Instrument Landing System, LLZ: Localizer Note 2. RFF: Rescue and Fire Fighting

　　　　　Planning Parameters-　Dimensions/Strength of Runway, Taxiways and Aprons-　Performance Requirements of CNS/ATM and AGL Note

-　Number of Aircraft Parking Stands-　Required Floor Spaces of Terminals-　Required Capacity of UtilitiesNote. CNS/ATM: Communication, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management

AGL: Aeronautical Ground Lights

Planning Considerations- Design Aircraft- Aerodrome Category （Annex14)- Approach Category of Runway- Base Standards and Manuals

Prioritization

Evaluation Criteria-　Cost Saving-　Realization of Development Target-　Airport Functional Relevance-　Minimum Interruption to Airport Operation

Verification of Project Scope

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Image of Prioritization and Verification of Project Scope (subject to further examination)

Present　　　　　 Short-term Proposal　　　　　　 Remarks 　　 Design Aircraft： F100　　　　B737 and smaller Runway extension and taxiway widening not requiredTaxing of B737: Restricted Stub taxiways only Widening of parallel taxiway not required　Fire Station Layout: Inconvenient Improvement of access to RWY Improvement of layout and reconstruction in medium-termFire Engines： Old/Incomplete　Addition o RIV Minimum to meet ICAO requirementILS： Not provided　　　Localizer/DME only Upgrading to Semi ILS from VOR/DME approachCargo Terminal: Inside PTB Utilize existing PTB Volume is not significant yet. Exclusive CTB in future. Note. PTB: Passenger Terminal Building, CTB: Cargo Terminal Building

（10）　Formulation of Airport Master Development Plan

Alternative Locations of New PTB

Project Scope(Base Case)

Evaluation

Draft Nadzab Airport Master Development Plan

(Airport and Terminal Area)

Preparation and Discussion of Technical Note No. 1

Design Aircraft for Simultaneous OperationShort-term: B737 and B737 or smallerMedium-term: B787 and B737Long-term: B787 and B787

Separation Distances between Airside Facilities for Simultaneous Operation of Long-term Design Aircraft

Fixed Gates for B737 (Nose-in)

Utilization of Existing Apron

Examination of Runway Widening, Pavement Reinforcement

Examination of RWY Extension Alternatives

Examination of New PTB Location, Expansion Plan

Note. 1　Work in Japan Note 2　Work in PNG

Criteria-　Flexibility to cater for fluctuation of demand-　Expansibility to meet increasing demand-　Minimizing aircraft noise impact on surrounding area-　Protection from Erap River Flooding- Others

Figure 1.3-1 Study Procedure Flow 2 of 4


1-7

（14） Preliminary Examination of Work Execution Plan and Project Implementation Plan

（13) Preliminary Design

　　Design Standards and Conditions-　Manuals of JICA-　ICAO Standards and Recommendations-　Standards/Specifications of PNG-　Other Internationally Accepted Standards-　Design Aircraft and Movements-　Design Loads-　Temperature, Humidity, etc.- Others

　 Design Requirements-　Simultaneous operation of international and domestic-　Universal Design-　Eco-airport-　Protection against Earthquake, Flooding, Fire-　Culture of PNG-　Low cost for operation and maintenance

Discussion on Technical Note No. 1

(11）　Preparation of Interim Report

(12）　Discussion on Interim Report

Preliminary Design Drawings &Specifications-　Runway, Taxiways, Apron, Access Road, etc.-　Utilities-　Passenger and Cargo Terminal Buildings-　CNS/ATM-　Aeronautical Ground Lights

　Available Suppliers and Services for Maintenance-　Cement, asphalt, steel bars, etc.-　General building materials-　Building Management System, Elevators, IT-　Solar Generation Panels, Solar Water Heater Panels-　Baggage Handling System, Passenger Boarding Bridges-　Sanitary Products-　Building Vibration Control and Mitigation System-　CNS/ATM equipment-　Aeronautical Ground Lights, Power Supply

Examination of Applicability of Japanese Technology & Products-　Eco-airport related technology-　Hazard-protection related technology-　Examples in airport development-　Needs in development of Nadzab Airport-　Availability of technology in PNG-　Availability of long-term maintenance and spare parts

　　 Listing of Applicable Technologies and Materials-　Eco-airport-　Hazard protection-　High quality cement-　Others

Project Implementation

Schedule

　　 Procurement.-　E/N & Yen Loan Agreement-　Selection of Consultant-　Design-　Selection of Contractor

Construction Work Scheduling-　Number of workable days-　Standard progress rates of construction work-　Approximate period of construction work-　Identification of critical path-　Preparation of construction schedule

　Work Execution from Airport Operational Viewpoints-　Layout of Temporary Facilities and Stock Yards-　Method of Runway Reinforcement and Widening-　Method of Taxiway Reinforcement-　Method of Existing Apron Expansion/Reinforcement- Method of New Apron Construction for B737/B787-　Method of Construction of New Passenger Terminal-　Method of ILS Installation, Renewal of ATC equipment-　Method of installation of Aeronautical Ground Lights

（15） Preliminary Project Cost Estimate

　 Collection of Base Data-　Unit rates of equipment, materials and labor in PNG-　Actual prices of similar works in PNG (CADIP)

　　　Construction Cost Estimate　　　　-　Unit rates of construction　　　　-　Quantity calculation　　　　-　Construction cost estimate

　 Related Project Costs- Contingency for Price Escalation- Physical Contingency- Interest of Yen Loan during Construction- Front End Fee

　Estimate of Other Cost- Taxes and duties- Project management cost of NAC- Land acquisition if applicable

Confirmation on Percentage of Japanese Origin

　Overall Project Cost Estimate

Examination for Further Cost Reduction

Note 1　Work in Japan Note 2: Work in PNG



1-8

Note 1: Work in Japan Note 2: Work in PNG

(22) Preparation of Final Report

(21) Preparation and Discussion of Draft Final Report

(20) Examination on Consulting Services: TOR and Staff-month Requirement

Preparation and Discussion of Technical Note No. 2

(18) Economic and Financial Analysis and Examination of Operation/Effect Indicators1) Financial Analysis - Financial cash flow analysis based on current tariff system - Recommendations for revision of tariff　system2) Examination of Repayment of Yen Loan - Terms and conditions of Yen Loan - Financial arrangement for other fund - Financial Cash Flow Analysis3) Economic Analysis4) Examination Operation and/Effect Indicators - Quantifiable indicators - Qualitative indicators

(17) Operation and Maintenance after Project Implementation1) Confirmation/Examination of Problems of Existing Operation and Maintenance Organization of Nadzab Airport - Organizational Structure, Responsibility and Budget - Hunan Resources, Qualification and Capacity Building - Availability of Spare Parts2) Confirmation of Improvement Plan of Operation and Maintenance Organization of Airports under CADIP3) Financial Status of NAC - Breakdown of Income and Expenditure - Financial Statements (Balance Sheet/Income Statement/Cash Flow Statement) - Budget Allocation4) Recommendations for Improvement of Operation and Maintenance Organization

　　　　　　(16) Project Implementation Organization1) Examination of CADIP Project Implementation Organization - Legal Basis - Organizational Structure and Allocated Responsibility - Number and Qualification of Staff Members2) Budget Allocation by NAC3) Capacity Building - Training Courses for NAC Staff Members - Qualification and Promotion System - Experience of Similar Project Implementation4) Recommendations for Improvement of Project Implementation Organization

　　　　　　(19) Environmental and Social Consideration1) Base Line Survey - Natural environment - Land use of surrounding area - Residents - Socio-economic situation2) Environmental/Social Requirements in PNG - Laws and regulations, standard procedures - Deviation from JICA Guideline (April 2010) - Relevant organizations and their role demarcation3) Scoping4) Preparation of aircraft noise contours5) Environmental Impact Assessment/Examination of Alternatives6) Examination of Mitigation Measures7) Examination of Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan8) Examination of Budget, Source of Fund and Organization9) Assistance for holding stakeholder meeting if required



1-9

1.4 Work Schedule

【First Site Survey Work from April to July 2014】 During the first site survey work period, formulation of Nadzab Airport Master

Development Plan was substantially completed. Base line survey for the environmental and social considerations was also carried out

during this period. 【Works in Japan from July to August 2014】

Preparation of Interim Report 【Second Site Survey Work from September and October 2014】

Finalization of Nadzab Airport Master Development Plan; Preliminary design; Preliminary construction work execution planning; Preliminary project implementation cost estimate; Examination of project implementation organization; Examination of operation and maintenance after implementation of the Project; Economic, Financial Analysis and Examination of Operation/Effect Indicators Examination on environmental and social considerations; and Examination on Scope and Input of Consulting Services.

【Works in Japan in November 2014】 Preparation of Draft Final Report

【Third Site Survey Work in December 2014】 Discussion on Draft Final Report

【Works in Japan in March 2015】 Preparation of Final Report.


1-10

Table 1.4-1 Work Schedule

TimeWork Items Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar.

Inception Report

Interim Report

Draft Final Report

Final Report

Work in PNG Work in Japan

(13) Finalizatiion of Airport Master Development Plan

(24) Preparation of Final Report

Submittals

2014 2015

(19) Economic and Financial Analysis and Examination of Operation/Effect Indicators

(20) Examination of Environmental and Social Consideration

(21) Examination of Consulting Services

(22) Preparation of Draft Final Report

(23) Discussion on Draft Final Report

(12) Discussion on Interim Report

(14) Preliminary Design

(15) Preliminary Examination of Work Execution Plan and Project Implementation Plan

(16) Preliminary Project Cost Estimate

(17) Project Implementation Organization

(18) Operation and Maintenance Organization

(6) Examination of Present Conditions

(7) Surveys

(8) Air Traffic Demand Forecast

(9) Verification of Existing Facilities and Examination of Facility Requirements

(10) Formulation of Airport Master Development Plan

(11) Preparation of Interim Report

(1) Data Collection and Analysis

(2) Preparation of Questionnaire

(3) Examination of Methodology, Schedule and Processes

(4) Preparation of Inception Report

(5) Discussiion on Interim Report

SECTION 2

BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT


2-1

SECTION 2: BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT

2.1 Papua New Guinea

2.1.1 Socio-Economic Conditions

1) Regions and Provinces

Papua New Guinea consists of four regions and the regions are further divided into one capital district and 22 provinces as shown in Figure 2.1-1 and Table 2.1-1. Nadzab/Lae Airport is located in Morobe Province (numbered 11 below).

Figure 2.1-1 Provinces of Papua New Guinea

Table 2.1-1 Regions and Provinces of Papua New Guinea No. Province Capital Region No. Province Capital Region

1 Central Port Moresby Southern 12 New Ireland Kavieng Islands

2 Chimbu Kundiawa Highlands 13 Northern Popondetta Southern

3 Eastern Highlands Goroka Highlands 14 AR*1 of Bougainville Arawa Islands

4 East New Britain Kokopo Islands 15 Southern Highlands Mendi Highlands

5 East Sepik Wewak Momase 16 Western Daru Southern

6 Enga Wabag Highlands 17 Western Highlands Mount Hagen Highlands

7 Gulf Kerema Southern 18 West New Britain Kimbe Islands

8 Madang Madang Momase 19 West Sepik Vanimo Momase

9 Manus Lorengau Islands 20 NCD*2 Port Moresby Southern

10 Milne Bay Alotau Southern 21 Hela Tari Highlands

11 Morobe Lae Momase 22 Jiwaka Minj Highlands

Note. AR*1: Autonomous Region, NCD*2: National Capital District


2-2

2) Population

Population in Papua New Guinea increased from 3.011 million in 1980 to 7.275 million in 2011 at an annual growth rate of 2.9 %. Population of the provinces is shown in Table 2.1-2.

Table 2.1-2 Population of Provinces in Papua New Guinea PROVINCE 1980 1990 2000 2011 (Share %) Growth Rate (%) ‘80-‘11

PAPUA NEW GUINEA 3,010,727 3,761,954 5,190,786 7,275,324 (100) 2.9

SOUTHERN REGION 588,700 771,193 1,041,820 1,456,250 (20.1) 2.9

Western 78,575 110,420 153,304 201,351 (2.8) 3.0

Gulf 64,120 68,737 106,898 158,197 (2.2) 2.9

Central 116,964 141,195 183,983 269,756 (3.7) 2.7

National Capital District 123,624 195,570 254,158 364,125 (5.0) 3.5

Milne Bay 127,975 158,780 210,412 276,512 (3.8) 2.5

Northern 77,442 96,491 133,065 186,309 (2.6) 2.8

HIGHLAND REGION 1,121,258 1,373,673 1,973,996 2,854,874 (39.2) 3.0

Southern Highlands 236,052 317,437 360,318 510,245 (7.0) 2.5

Hela N/A N/A 185,947 249,449 (3.4) 3.1

Enga 164,534 235,561 295,031 432,045 (5.9) 1.0

Western Highlands 265,656 336,178 254,277 362,850 (5.0) 2.4

Jiwaka N/A N/A 185,798 343,987 (4.7) 2.4

Chimbu 178,290 183,849 259,703 376,473 (5.2) N/A

Eastern Highlands 276,726 300,648 432,972 579,825 (8.0) N/A

MOMOSA REGION 857,773 1,027,600 1,433,432 1,867,657 (25.7) 2.5

Morobe 310,622 380,117 539,404 674,810 (9.3) 2.5

Madang 211,069 253,195 365,106 493,906 (6.8) 2.8

East Sepik 221,890 254,371 343,181 450,530 (6.2) 2.3

West Sepik 114,192 139,917 185,741 248,411 (3.4) 2.5

ISLANDS REGION 442,996 589,488 741,538 1,096,543 (15.0) 2.9

Manus 26,036 32,840 43,387 60,485 (0.8) 2.7

New Ireland 66,028 86,999 118,350 194,067 (2.7) 3.5

East New Britain 133,917 185,459 220,133 328,369 (4.5) 2.9

West New Britain 88,941 130,190 184,508 264,264 (3.6) 3.5

AR Bougainville 127,794 154,000 175,160 249,358 (3.4) 2.1

Data: National Population & Housing Census 2011, National Statistical Office, Papua New Guinea


2-3

3) National Economy

a) Past Trend of GDP

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is typical socio-economic index which represents the situation of economy in PAPUA NEW GUINEA. International Monetary Fund (IMF) releases the historical GDP to their web site. Table 2.1-3 and Figure 2.1-2 show typical historical trend of GDP, GDP per capita and population. GDP was stagnant until around 2006 but thereafter it has been growing at annual growth rate of 6-10%.

Table 2.1-3 Historical Growth of Typical GDP, GDP per Capita and Population

Figure 2.1-2 Historical Growth of GDP in PAPUA NEW GUINEA

“Papua New Guinea’s Development Performance 1975-2008” dated September 2010 prepared by National Research Institute, briefly explains the economic situations during the

PopulationKina Change Kina USD Person

(billion) (%) (million)1996 7.960 6.599 1,715 1,110 4.6401997 7.455 -6.343 1,566 1,034 4.7611998 7.804 4.682 1,598 771 4.8831999 7.948 1.856 1,588 686 5.0062000 7.753 -2.455 1,511 682 5.1302001 7.750 -0.045 1,474 584 5.2562002 7.905 2.008 1,468 566 5.3842003 8.252 4.388 1,496 674 5.5152004 8.299 0.570 1,470 740 5.6472005 8.625 3.924 1,492 842 5.7812006 8.823 2.294 1,491 934 5.9172007 9.454 7.152 1,561 1,047 6.0562008 10.079 6.614 1,627 1,291 6.1962009 10.698 6.134 1,688 1,279 6.3392010 11.519 7.680 1,773 1,495 6.4972011 12.748 10.669 1,914 1,932 6.6602012 13.785 8.132 2,019 2,217 6.826

Current PriceSource: IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2014

YearGDP GDP per Capita

1998 Constant Price

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2014


2-4

periods of 1996-2000, 2001-2005 and 2006-2008 as follows: “The period of 1996-2000 was “payback time”; government expenditure had to be trimmed drastically. During the El Nino drought of 1997, people in the Highlands went hungry. The tough times saw a retraction in access to basic public services due to cost cutting by the government. It was also a period of high political instability. The period of 2001-2005 was one of reconsolidation, during which benefits from earlier legislative changes bore fruit in terms of political stability (emanating from the Organic Law and Integrity of Political Party Act of 2001), policy stability (emanating from the Central Bank Act of 2000), and financial sector revival (following privatization of the Papua New Guinea Banking Corporation and passage of the Banks and Financial Institutions Act of 2000). The period of 2006 to 2008 was one in which the economy was back on “full stream”, riding the commodity price boom propelled by growth of income in India and China and benefiting from continued political and policy stability.”

Table 2.1-4 shows GDP growth rates of industrial sectors and their share in total GDP. Since 2006 or 2007, the construction sector was the driving force of economic growth. The construction sector GDP increased at annual growth rates of 15.1% from 2003 to 2012 and 21.7% from 2008 to 2012 respectively, expanding its share in total GDP from 11.7% in 2006 to 16.7% in 2012. Other sectors that demonstrated robust growths are the transport and communication as well as the trade and finance.


2-5

Table 2.1-4 Sectoral GDP Growth Rates and Share

Item Year Total Agriculture Mining Manufac.

Electricity

Gas &

Water

Construction Trade Transport &

Communication Finance

Public

Administration Others

Growth

Rates

2004 0.6% -0.2% -1.8% 2.3% 1.7% 3.2% 3.2% 2.6% -3.4% -2.4% 1.0%

2005 3.9% 5.6% 1.2% 8.3% 5.1% 4.8% 3.5% 3.0% 10.2% 2.0% 21.7%

2006 2.3% 1.0% -8.5% 4.0% 1.3% 12.0% 8.4% 5.0% 9.7% 3.0% 12.4%

2007 7.2% 4.2% -0.1% 6.0% 4.0% 16.0% 10.0% 41.3% 5.0% 4.0% 30.2%

2008 6.6% 4.3% -1.4% 6.0% 6.8% 15.0% 7.0% 39.9% 6.0% 3.0% 6.5%

2009 6.1% 0.7% -1.7% 0.2% 7.5% 19.8% 9.5% 29.0% 15.0% 3.0% 7.3%

2010 7.6% 2.9% -2.0% 14.0% 9.4% 17.1% 12.6% 20.1% 9.5% 3.3% 4.9%

2011 11.3% 8.6% -11.8% 13.0% 9.5% 26.0% 18.0% 16.0% 20.1% 5.0% 3.9%

2012 9.2% 0.2% 0.6% 10.0% 12.0% 24.0% 15.0% 16.0% 10.0% 6.0% 4.7%

‘03-‘12 6.0% 3.0% -2.9% 7.0% 6.3% 15.1% 9.6% 18.4% 8.9% 3.0% 9.9%

‘08-‘12 8.5% 3.0% -3.8% 9.2% 9.6% 21.7% 13.7% 20.2% 13.6% 4.3% 5.2%

Share 2006 100.0% 37.6% 11.7% 7.7% 1.5% 11.7% 7.1% 2.6% 4.1% 13.2% 2.7%

2012 100.0% 32.5% 8.5% 7.5% 1.5% 16.7% 7.9% 6.2% 4.5% 11.5% 3.3%

Data source: Key Indicators for Asia and Pacific 2013, ADB


2-6

b) ADB’s View

Some of the important descriptions related to the national economy of Papua New Guinea were extracted from “Asian Development Outlook 2014-Papua New Guinea”, ADB dated April 2014, as presented below.

“Economic performance Economic growth in Papua New Guinea slowed to 5.1% in 2013 as construction on a $20 billion liquefied natural gas (LNG) project wound down toward completion in mid-2014. Growth in construction halved from 24% in 2012 to 12% in 2013, and this deceleration spilled over into the broader economy, slowing growth in wholesale and retail trade from 20% in 2012 to 5% in 2013. Long-term declines continued at a number of older mining and oil operations, but they were more than offset by increased output from a new nickel project, such that mining and quarrying as a whole expanded by 15% in 2013. Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries grew at a modest 0.5% in 2013. Although this improved on the 1.6% contraction in 2012, conditions in the sector continue to be hampered by falling commodity prices, declining yields from aging plantations, inadequate pest control, and poor transport infrastructure. Further, an elevated exchange rate for much of the year discouraged farm output, especially of labor-intensive cash crops like copra, cocoa and coffee…………………………………….” “Economic prospects GDP growth is forecast at 6.0% in 2014, picking up to a record 21.0% in the following year although ongoing challenges with the quality of macroeconomic data continue to limit the accuracy of these forecasts. Leading this growth is oil and gas, as LNG production is expected to commence in late 2014, making 2015 the first full year of production. The rebound in mining and quarrying is expected to continue as new operations further expand production, boosting real growth in that sector to 14.0% in 2014 before it fall back to 3.1% in 2015.


2-7

In contrast with mining and petroleum extraction, activity in the rest of the economy is expected to continue to slow, with growth forecast at just 1.6% in 2014. Construction is forecast to contract by 6.4% in 2014, following the completion of the LNG production facilities and pipeline by the middle of the year. Growth in transport and logistics, wholesale and retail trade, and financial services will ease from the highs recorded over the previous 3 years. The agriculture, forestry, and fisheries sector is expected to recover, with growth of 4.0% in both 2014 and 2015. Agricultural output is expected to be boosted by the kina’s decline at the end of 2013, which has improved the export competitiveness of cash crops. Although GDP growth is expected to hit record highs in 2015, this will have only limited immediate impact on the broader economy and job creation. As international investors own some 80% of the LNG project, it is likely most earnings will remain offshore. And, as the project comes onstream, employment in the project will drop dramatically, from a peak of about 16,000 workers during construction to a few hundred once the project is fully operational. As a result, the project will have much less impact on gross national income than on GDP. The project’s key transmission mechanism to the domestic economy will be dividend and tax payments to the national government, which are expected to peak in the early 2020s. During the initial yeas of production, some of these revenues will likely be required to service loans that fund the state’s equity holding in the project. They may also be used for investment in further resource development………………………………………………………………………”

c) IMF’s View

“Papua New Guinea Staff Report for the 2013 Article IV Consultation” in December 2013 (IMF Country Report No. 13/339) stipulates the key issues related to the national economy of Papua New Guinea as follows:

“Key Issues Context: After a decade of strong growth, Papua New Guinea now faces a sharp slowdown in the nonmineral sector as construction winds down on a large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) project. LNG revenue increases are expected to be modest and one-off over the near to medium term, posing challenges to meet the country’s huge development needs while trying to maintain debt sustainability. PAPUA NEW GUINEA needs to create an enabling environment for sustained, inclusive growth in the post boom era.


2-8

Outlook and risk: Overall growth prospects remain generally positive, but the slowdown of the nonmineral sector increased headwinds for job-creating growth. Inflation is expected to stabilize at lower levels than in the recent past. Risks to economic growth in 2013-2015 are broadly balanced, but they are increasing tilted toward the downside over the longer term, reflecting uncertainty over mineral prices and investment and global shale gas development. Policy assessment: Policy discussion focused on resource revenue management, macroeconomic and financial stability, and structural reforms to engender sustained, inclusive growth. Key recommendations include: Target a moderate fiscal deficit in 2014 in line with absorptive capacity and focus on

improvement in spending quality. Over the medium term, constrain and smooth spending to stay below the government’s debt ceiling of 30 percent of GSP.

Strengthen the interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission by reducing excess liquidity. Closely monitor financial sector risks arising from possible price corrections in certain segments of the property market.

Improve transparency in the management of resource revenue; safeguard resources for the sovereign wealth fund; continue to reform public enterprises; improve the business environment; and strengthen the agricultural sector.

Take early action to address long-standing issues on economic statistics and anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism.

“Papua New Guinea Staff Report for the 2013 Article IV Consultation” in its Table of Papua New Guinea Medium-term Scenario 2009-2018 presented future GDP growth scenario as shown Table 2.1-5.

Table 2.1-5 IMF Prospect on Annual Growth Rates of Real GDP of Papua New Guinea Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Actual Estimated Projected

Real GDP 6.1 7.7 10.7 8.1 5.4 6.3 21.4 3.3 3.4 3.5

Mineral -1.7 -2.0 -11.8 -6.9 5.3 80.7 178.3 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6

Nonmineral 7.0 8.7 12.8 9.2 5.4 1.7 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.5

Source: Papua New Guinea Staff Report for the 2013 Article IV Consultation” in December 2013

d) Papua New Guinea Vision 2050

In December 2007, the National Executive Council (NEC) of Papua New Guinea, on advice from the National Planning Committee (NPC), made an decision to develop a framework for a long-term strategy-“The Papua New Guinea Vision 2050”-that should map out the future direction for the country and reflect the aspiration of the people of Papua New Guinea. With regard to the future economic growth, following four scenarios were presented in PAPUA


2-9

NEW GUINEA Vision 2050:

i) Base Case (Scenario One); The Base Case Scenario (Scenario One) in the economic growth projections involving renewable resources is the minimum possible under improved service delivery, the promotion of human capital development, increased downstream processing, development and adoption of new technologies and improved productivity. The economy will grow in real terms at an average of 4.5 percent per year up to 2020. With an estimated population growth of 2.5 percent over the next 40 years until 2050, an increase in per capita income is expected.

ii) Scenario Two; When Land Reform (Scenario Two) is undertaken starting in 2010, the Base Case Scenario will be enhanced. When around three percent more of customary land is brought into production in the normal sector, the economy is projected grow at additional 1.2 percent each year on average. This scenario will empower the people to participate in income-generating activities through cultivation of their land. This will lead to broad-based economic growth and ensure balanced development in rural and urban areas.

iii) Scenario Three; With the inclusion of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) project (Scenario 3), excluding land reform, the economic growth will be even better.

iv) Scenario Four; When the combined three scenarios are realized (Scenario Four), real GDP growth will more than double.

The expected real GDP under differenct scenarios are as as shown hereunder and summarized in Table 2.1-6.

Table 2.1-6 Expected Average Annual Growth Rates of PAPUA NEW GUINEA Vision 2050

Period Base Case (BC) Land Reform with BC LNG with BC Cumulative with BC/LNG

Scenario One Scenario Two Scenario Three Scenario Four

2010-2015 4.5 4.0 12.0 10.0

2015-2020 4.5 4.0 3.3 3.0

2020-2025 4.5 6.0 7.0 8.0

2025-2030 4.5 6.0 7.0 8.0

Note. The growth rates were computed based on “Table 2.1 Four Pronged Projected Economic Scenario 2010-2050”.


2-10

Source: Papua New Guinea Vision 2050


2-11

e) 2014 Budget Strategy Paper of Papua New Guinea

With regard to economic outlook 2015-2018, 2014 Budget Strategy Paper presented by the Minister for Treasury stipulates as follows:

“Economic activity over the medium term (2015-2018) is underpinned by the winding down of the PNG LNG project construction phase in 2013 and the commencement of the PNG LNG project production towards the end of 2014 leading to a ramp up to full production in 2015.

Growth is projected to ease to 6.0 per cent in 2014 with the winding down of the PNG LNG project construction phase in 2014 before increasing to 21.5 per cent in 2015 reflective of the commencement of PNG LNG project production towards the end of 2014 before returning to a growth of around 3.0 per cent thereafter. Other sectors of the economy are also expected to grow over the medium term in line with the major drivers of the economy.

Inflation is projected to pick up slightly to 6.5 per cent in 2014 and ease slightly to 5.0 per cent thereafter, assuming credible monetary policy and restrained fiscal policy.

Table 2.1-7a 2015 to 2018 Economic Outlook presented by Minister of Finance 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018


Economic Growth (%)

Total GDP (Estimated) 8.0 6.1 6.0 21.5 3.1 3.3 1.9

Non-Mining GDP (Estimated) 9.1 5.5 1.3 4.3 4.3 4.5 2.4

Inflation (%)

Year average 2.2 5.6 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Data source: Extracted from 2014 Budget Strategy Paper

According to 2015 National Budget, Volume 1 available at the time of Draft Final Report preparation, Papua New Guinea economy in 2014 is expected to grow at 8.4% and is projected to grow at 15.5% in 2015. The expected total growth in 2014 and 2015 in 2014 Budget Strategy Paper was 28.8% while the latest expected growth in the same period is 25.2%.


2-12

f) Debt Strategy

According to 2015 National Budget Volume 1, the estimated budget deficit is projected to be PGK 2,272.2 million in 2015, which is slightly lower than the estimated deficit of PGK 2,429.0 million in 2014. In 2014, the State’s financing methods comprised of:

i) Issuance of Kina denominated Inscribed Stock and Treasury Bills via tender for general funding. These were done at monthly and weekly intervals respectively; and

ii) Foreign currency denominated loans from development partners for specific projects.

Inscribed Stocks are bond securities of varying maturities (3 to 17 years) issued domestically via competitive tender. Treasury Bills are a discount security issued for 182 days or 364 days via competitive tender. Foreign currencies denominated loans are primarily concessional loans from bilateral or multilateral development partners and are generally repayable over 20-32 years. Refer to Table 2.1-7b.

Table 2.1-7b Central Government Debts (2015 National Budget Volume 1)

Financing Source

Estimated

Balance Repayment Borrowing Balance Change

2014 end 2015 2015 2015 end 2015

Domestic Debt 10,768.1 8,618.6 7,579.8 9,729.3 -1,038.8 Treasury Bills 4,564.3 8,127.5 6,379.8 2,816.5 -1,747.8

Inscribed Stock 6,203.8 491.1 1,200.0 6,912.8 709.0

External Debt 3,720.3 175.8 986.8 4,531.3 811.0 Int’l Agencies 3,720.3 175.8 986.8 4,531.3 811.0

Commercial Loans

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 14,488.4 8,794.4 8,566.6 14,260.6 -227.8 % of Nominal GDP 35.5% - - 27.8% -

Fiscal Responsibility Act 2006 imposes a normal debt to GDP limit on central Government borrowings of 35% of GDP for 2013, 2014 and 2015, with the level falling to 30% thereafter. Whilst it is expected that the ratio will slightly exceed the 35%-threshold in 2014, it is projected to fall to 27.8% in the following year. It is further expected to fall over the remaining years, reaching a low of 23.6% in 2019. Table 2.1-7c shows the debt sustainability measures (debt to GDP).

Table 2.1-7c Debt Sustainability Measures (2015 National Budget Volume 1)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Debt to GDP 34.6% 35.5% 27.8% 28.0% 26.6% 25.2% 23.6%


2-13

4) Mineral Resources

a) Generally

Contribution of the mineral sector to GDP growth was negative until 2012 but has become positive in 2013 and will be significant in 2014 and 2015 as shown in Table 2.1-2. The exports of mineral have been accounting for approximately 75% of the total as shown in Table 2.1-8.

Table 2.1-8 Contribution of Mineral Sector to Balance of Payment (Billion US$)

Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


Exports, FOB 4.5 5.9 6.9 6.1 6.0 7.2

Of which Mineral

(Share in Exports, %)

3.4

(75.5)

4.4

(74.6)

4.9

(71.0)

4.5

(73.8

4.5

(75.1)

5.5

(76.4)

Imports, CIF -3.3 -4.3 -6.3 -7.4 -5.4 -4.4

Source: “IMF Papua New Guinea Staff Report for the 2013 Article IV Consultation” in December 2013

b) Location of Oil and LNG Projects

Figure 2.1-3 shows location of the oil and LNG projects in Papua New Guinea compiled by Papua New Guinea Chamber of Mines and Petroleum, 2011. The majority of current and possible project sites are located in the Regions of Western, Southern Highlands and Gulf.

Figure 2.1-3 Location of Oil and LNG Projects in Papua New Guinea


2-14

c) PNG LNG Project

“The PNG LNG Project is an integrated development that includes gas production and processing facilities in the Southern Highlands, Hela, Western, Gulf and Central Provinces. There are over 700km of pipelines connecting the facilities, which includes a gas conditioning plant in Hides and liquefaction and storage facilities with capacity of 6.9 million tons per year. The investment for the initial phase of the Project, excluding shipping costs, is estimated at US$19billion. Over the life of the Project, it is expected that over nine trillion cubic feet of gas will be produced and sold. PNG LNG will provide a long-term supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to four major customers in the Asian region including:

iii) China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation. iv) Osaka Gas Company Limited. v) The Tokyo Electric Power Company Inc. vi) CPC Corporation.

The Project will progress in a series of development phases with the first LNG deliveries scheduled to begin in 2014. (About PNG LNG from Official Website of PNG LNG Project”

Figure 2.1-4 Schematic Diagram of PNG LNG Project

(Source: PNG LNG Project Overview by Oil Search)

d) Morobe Mining Joint Venture (MMJV)

Based on the information shown on MMJV website, summary descriptions of MMJV and location map are presented below.


2-15

“Morobe Mining Joint Venture (MMJV) is a 50-50 joint venture between Harmony Gold Mining Company of South Africa and Newcrest Mining Limited of Australia. MMJV was formally established in August 2008 for the purpose of exploring, developing and operating mines in the Morobe Province of Papua New Guinea. The MMJV covers all current and future mining project and exploration activities by the two parent companies in the Morobe Province, including the Hidden Valley Gold Mine and significant resource discovery at Wafi/Golpu.

Morobe Mining Joint Venture is the collective name for three Joint Venture entities entered into between Harmony and Newcrest:

Hidden Valley Mine Joint Venture (HVJV), open pit gold and silver mine, located 90km southwest of Lae Seaport.

Wafi-Golpu Joint Venture (WGJV), with estimated mineral resources of 28.5 million ounces of gold and 9.1 million tons copper and 50.6 million ounces of silver, located 65km southwest of Lae Seaport; and

Morobe Exploration Joint Venture (MEJV), with known mineral endowment of over 25 million ounces of gold, 102 million ounces of silver and 55 thousand kg of molybdenum.

MMJV is based in Morobe Province and its scope of operations and properties includes, the operating Hidden Valley Gold mine, the significant copper gold porphyry Wafi Golpu project-(in pre-feasibility study phase), an exploration base in Wafu and a PNG Central Services Office in Lae. MMJV also has an extensive Brown and Greenfield’s exploration program with 13 exploration leases (6 new applications) covering more than 4046km2 in the province. (Abstracted from Morobe Mining Joint Venture Website)”


2-16

Figure 2.1-5 Location of MMJV Project Sites (Source: Morobe Mining Joint Venture Website)


2-17

5) Tourism Master Plan

In September 2006, Papua New Guinea Tourism Sector Review and Master Plan (2007-2017) “Growing PNG Tourism as a Sustainable Industry” (hereinafter referred to as the “Tourism M/P”) was formulated by the Independent Consumer and Competition Commission (ICCC) PNG and the Tourism Promotion Authority (PNGTPA).

The Tourism M/P defined its Vision as “by 2017 PNG tourism is a growing and sustainable industry which: Is recognized globally as a destination which offers a range of unique niche adventure

tourism experiences; Generates significant investment and employment through profitable business opportunities

and subsequently the development of economy; Celebrates, protects and enhances our unique cultural heritage and natural environment by

showcasing these attributes; Provide visitors with an enjoyable, distinct and memorable experience; Demonstrates partnership and collaboration across all stakeholders; and Provide a broad distribution of benefits across PNG thereby improving the lifestyles of rural

and urban communities.

The overall goal that should be adopted and targeted for the next 10 years is to increase the overall economic value of tourism to the nation by doubling the number of tourists on holiday in PNG every five years and maximizing sustainable tourism growth for the social and environmental benefit for all Papua New Guineans.”

The key recommendations to achieve the Vision for tourism in PNG are: Marketing the destination; Product development and investment; Transport and infrastructure; Human resource development; and Institutions and industry partnerships.

One of the recommendations related to the air transport sector is upgrading and undertaking of maintenance of existing airport infrastructure to a “fit for purpose” basis backed by a commercial justification for the investment in terms of its future demand prospects and access to concessional loans and funding to be subject to full cost/benefit assessment.

According to the Review of Progress as of September 2012, at the level of the overarching goals of holiday arrivals, expenditure and employment, the implementation of the Tourism M/O has been successful; holiday arrivals have doubled since 2005 (at year end 2011) and all arrivals by 120 percent. The expenditure goal for 2010 was exceeded two year ahead of target. It is


2-18

estimated that around 20,000 jobs have been created in the tourism sector since 2005 due to the growing number of visitors which is ahead of the M/P target. An assessment of the level of implementation within the five focal areas identified indicates a varying level of success in terms of implementation from high (Marketing) to moderate to high (Transport and Infrastructure) to moderate (Institutions and Industry Partnerships) to low to moderate (Human Resource Development and Investment Incentives and Product Development).

6) Visitor Survey 2011

Visitor Survey Report-2011 was compiled by PNG Tourism Promotion Authority. The report covers the result of the eight round of visitor survey conducted in Papua New Guinea from April to September 2011. The survey was conducted continuously throughout the period so as to get a better representative data that will determine near accurate findings after its analysis. Major findings are shown below.

a) Purpose of Visit Holiday travelers; 28%. Business; 32%. Short-term employment; 22% Visiting families and relatives, others; 18%.

b) Average Length of Stay: 20.4 days. c) Average Expenditure: US$207.23 /visitor/day (See below.)

Table 2.1-9 Average Expenditure by Purpose of Visit Description Business Holiday Work VFR Education M&C Sports Church Others Total

A.E.P.H PGK 9,247 12,706 10,620 9,445 10,689 8,775 12,250 8,550 9,273 9,679

US$ 4,041 5,552 4,641 4,127 4,671 3,834 5,353 3,737 4,052 4,230

L.O.S (days) 15.09 14.87 35.48 20.05 33.98 9.00 6.17 22.07 23.75 20.41

Daily

Exp.

PGK 613 854 299 471 315 975 1,985 387 390 474

US$ 268 373 131 206 137 426 868 169 171 207

Total (Persons) 958 844 615 175 111 102 12 139 44 3,000

A.E.P.H: Average Expenditure per Head, L.O.S/: Length of Stay, Daily Exp.: Daily Expenditure, VFR: Visiting

families and Relatives, M&C: Meeting & Conference, PGK: Papua New Guinean Kina


2-19

d) Visitor Arrivals by Region

Data Visitor Survey 2011 Report, PNG Tourism Promotion Authority

2.1.2 Road Networks and Sea Ports

1) Road Networks

The roads in Papua New Guinea have developed around the provincial centers of population, many of which are on the coast and lined nationally by coastal shipping. Local road networks have been developed from these coastal centers, along the coastal plains and up river valleys and over mountain passes to penetrate inland. The Highlands Region is landlocked, with the main centers connected by air, and this spurred the development of the Highlands Highway, connecting the five inland provinces with the coast and PAPUA NEW GUINEA’s main port of Lae.

This pattern of development has resulted in separated road networks. There has been a long held aspiration to link the networks on the main island of New Guinea together, although making these linkages often involves long lengths of high cost road through less populated parts of the country and over difficult mountainous or swampy terrain.

The travel time and cost for some of these missing links, if constructed, will not always compare favorably with coastal shipping, and the economic rationale for making the connections needs to

Province Business Holiday VFR Education M & C Work Others

Daru 26 65 0 0 0 41 15 147 2.6%

Kerema 13 5 0 0 0 41 9 68 1.2%

Central 30 68 8 6 3 58 18 191 3.4%

NCD 802 460 107 45 99 440 103 2,056 36.5%

Kokoda 3 114 4 0 0 9 2 132 2.3%

Alotau 23 74 5 14 0 35 2 153 2.7%

Oro 5 57 2 1 0 11 11 87 1.5%

Lae 174 48 39 13 3 94 27 398 7.1%

Madang 47 213 43 23 2 63 37 428 7.6%

Wewak 18 146 7 14 0 18 12 215 3.8%

Vanimo 7 0 0 0 0 2 2 11 0.2%

Tari 8 103 3 0 0 26 8 148 2.6%

Mendi/Moro 56 11 0 0 0 103 9 179 3.2%

Wabag 0 12 7 0 0 0 9 28 0.5%

Hagen 49 217 12 5 8 35 30 356 6.3%

Simbu 6 38 2 7 0 5 0 58 1.0%

Goroka 50 158 44 12 2 37 40 343 6.1%

Rabaul 35 64 19 12 0 20 17 167 3.0%

Kimbe 52 67 2 18 1 2 14 156 2.8%

Kavieng 41 114 0 28 0 39 10 232 4.1%

Lorengau 12 13 4 0 0 3 0 32 0.6%

Buka 19 5 1 2 0 19 7 53 0.9%

1,476 2,052 309 200 118 1,101 382 5,638 100.0%

26.2% 36.4% 5.5% 3.5% 2.1% 19.5% 6.8% 100.0% -Total

Total


2-20

be weighed against other priorities, so that only those links that can be shown to have good economic and social benefit in relation to cost are constructed.

The public road network in PAPUA NEW GUINEA comprises declared national roads, the responsibility of national government and other sub-national roads, the responsibility of provincial and local level governments. National roads are currently classified into national routes (NR), the main inter-provincial connecting roads, national main roads (NM), national district roads (ND) and national institutional roads (NI-access roads serving state institutions).

Among the national road networks, those related to Morobe Province are briefly described hereunder.

a) Highlands Highway Network: Backbone connector between the main port of Lae in Morobe Province and five Highland Provinces. NR0004: branching off southwest outside of Lae, passing through Morobe Province to

the old goldfields area of Bulolo and Wau. NR0007: crossing the braided floodplain of the Markham River and, at Waterais

Junction, turn southwest to Goroka and Mt. Hagen. NR0005 and NR0006: west of Hagen, the road divides at Togoba into the Enga

Highway to the northwest to Wabag (NR0006) while the Highlands Highway continues west to Mendi in Southern Highlands Province (NR0005).

b) Madang Network

Ramu Highway (NR0008): the Highlands Highway connects to Madang Province via the Ramu Highway (NR0008) from Waterais Junction, following Ramu River Valley to Usino, and then turning northeast to Madang.

Coastal Highway (NR0009) runs northwest from Madang along the coastal margin.

Figure 2.1-6 shows an old map of road network of Papua New Guinea. The map was prepared in February 1986, but no significant difference is observed from the current description.


2-21

Figure 2.1-6 Schematic Road Network in Papua New Guinea


2-22

2) Sea Ports

a) Generally

PNG Ports Corporation Limited (PNGPCL) is the agency delegated with the responsibility for maintenance and development of the government-owned port facilities and for the general management of activities within the defined port limits of the declared ports under the Harbors Act. There are 22 declared ports, of which 16 are operated by PNG Ports Corporation, either directly or through agents. Port Moresby, Lae, Kimbe, Rabaul, Oro Bay and Madang have port facilities capable of accommodating vessels exceeding 150m length and draft up to 10m.

Table 2.1-10 shows the traffic through declared ports under PNG Ports. Lae is the most important port in terms of cargo volume.

Table 2.1-10 Traffic through PNGPCL Declared Ports

Port Province Operator

/Status

Total

Cargo

% Int’l Containers

(‘1000 TEU)

Ship Calls

(‘1000s)

Lae Morobe PNG Ports 3.3 60 150 1.26

Port Moresby Central/NCD PNG Ports 1.5 62 80 1.43

Kimbe WNB PNG Ports 0.7 69 20 0.57

Rabaul ENB PNG Ports 0.4 37 18 0.46

Wewak East Sepik PNG Ports 0.2 18 6 0.86

Oro Bay Oro PNG Ports 0.19 61 5 0.25

Madang Madang PNG Ports 0.17 73 4 0.48

Alotau Milne Bay PNG Ports 0.16 61 6 0.25

Buka Bougainville PNG Ports 0.09 N/A 3 0.25

Kavieng New Ireland PNG Ports 0.08 18 3 0.14

Kieta Bougainville PNG Ports 0.07 15 2 0.06

Vanimo Sandaun PNG Ports 0.05 6 0.05 0.19

Lorengau Manus PNG Ports 0.03 1 0.00 0.09

Aitape West Sepik Agent N/A N/A N/A N/A

Samarai Milne Bay Agent N/A N/A N/A N/A

Daru Western Not in use - - - -

Kerema Gulf Not in use - - - -

Kinim (Karkar) Madang Not in use - - - -

Siassi Morobe Not in use - - - -

Kupiano Central Not in use - - - -

Lihir New Ireland Mining Co. N/A N/A N/A N/A

Misima Milne Bay Mining Co. N/A N/A N/A N/A


2-23

Port Province Operator

/Status

Total

Cargo

% Int’l Containers

(‘1000 TEU)

Ship Calls

(‘1000s)

Total PNG Ports - 6.8 60

Notes TEU=Twenty-foot Equivalent Units, includes container movements; Total Cargo is million revenue tons; figures

projected to 2010 and are approximate. Source: TIPS base data set.

Abstract from National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy

b) Lae Port

Major commodity groups exported from Papua New Guinea are agricultural products and fuel/mining products, and dominating commodity group imported is manufactures as presented in Table 2.1-11 below.

Table 2.1-11 Breakdown of Main Commodity Groups in Export/Import of PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Breakdown in economy’s total exports Breakdown in economy’s total imports

By main commodity group By main commodity group

Agricultural products 23.6% Agricultural products 16.2%

Fuels and mining products 43.8% Fuels and mining products 16.2%

Manufactures 4.1% Manufactures 60.5%

Source: Trade Profiles prepared by World Trade Organization

Table 2.1-12 shows cargo revenue tonnages at major ports of Lae and Port Moresby and others in 2007, 2008 and 2009 (only data extractable from PNGPCL website). Lae accounted for almost half the tonnages of all types of the cargo except for the Palm Oil, followed by Port Moresby.

In the hinterland of Lae Port there exist Highland Provinces where abundant fruit and vegetable products are grown and MMJV exploiting gold, cooper, etc. As the industrial center of Papua New Guinea, several large-scale manufacturers are located in and adjacent areas to Lae.

According to a magazine published by PNGPCL, profile of Lae Port is described “The location of Lae city makes Lae Port the most strategic marine gateway to PAPUA NEW GUINEA. The Port is connected to the Highlands by road and the Island can easily be accessed by coastal vessels at low cost. These are two resource rich regions of the country that are also home to a thriving agricultural sector. Coffee, tea, cocoa and copra from the two regions have been exported out of Lae Port for many decades and this will continue into the future. Furthermore, the city is the industrial hub of the country, with the manufacturers using the port to move their products to markets in the Asia/Pacific region as well as in PAPUA NEW GUINEA, thus Lae will continue to provide that point of contact in the logistical supply chain between land transportation and the


2-24

shipping industry. Currently Lae Port is handling over 214.1 million tons of cargo monthly and berthing facilities are being expanded and wharf structures redeveloped to improve efficiency and productivity at the country’s premier port. The work is in line with PNGPCL’s 20 Year Corporate Strategic Plan and also the National Government’s Vision 2050 and Medium Term Development Plans. The company will continue to invest in its infrastructure to meet demands and regulatory requirements. It is important that Lae Port operates in an efficient, safe and secure environment for the benefit of all port users. In recent years, business for the port has grown significantly, driven by the economy and it is important that Lae is maintained as a well-functioning and efficient port to effectively manage the movement of freight within the port area between sea and land transportation.” (Extract from Ahoy October-December 2013)


2-25

Table 2.1-12 Cargo Revenue Tonnages at Major Ports of Lae, Port Moresby and Others (2007 to 2009)

Data: PNGPCL’s Website

Lae PortMoresby

Others Total Lae PortMoresby

Others Total Lae PortMoresby

Others Total

Import 926,725 437,967 149,279 1,513,971 945,041 493,916 156,244 1,595,201 972,896 518,135 132,840 1,623,871Export 244,922 64,933 131,074 440,929 303,282 81,051 157,389 541,722 247,728 66,131 121,188 435,047Import 375,070 180,320 83,746 639,136 569,425 156,386 77,092 802,903 449,615 161,634 77,184 688,433Export 85,158 33,571 50,112 168,841 80,433 38,247 59,916 178,596 62,121 37,709 56,616 156,446Import 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Export 0 0 399,314 399,314 0 0 437,533 437,533 0 0 447,207 447,207Import 51,506 10,288 4,245 66,039 81,872 8,272 19,304 109,448 142,526 150 67,832 210,508Export 109 1,499 22,587 24,195 3,872 4,584 17,885 26,341 11,293 1,079 12,477 24,849

Off & On 50,280 50,745 16,540 117,565 44,352 33,827 19,981 98,160 43,574 44,733 3,294 91,601Total 1,733,770 779,323 856,897 3,369,990 2,028,277 816,283 945,344 3,789,904 1,929,753 829,571 918,638 3,677,962

Import 142,856 198,899 295,048 636,803 167,260 234,224 389,158 790,642 141,056 265,384 332,268 738,708Export 500,351 174,403 116,210 790,964 550,323 196,385 145,684 892,392 498,787 166,280 106,878 771,945Import 100,054 31,132 143,556 274,742 84,257 47,047 209,828 341,132 79,025 25,329 179,101 283,455Export 135,838 58,625 80,776 275,239 136,805 54,267 97,564 288,636 134,010 50,589 88,972 273,571Import 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Export 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 168Import 144,974 9,156 158,179 312,309 137,364 7,700 181,111 326,175 167,365 1,872 156,584 325,821Export 14,522 36,945 5,363 56,830 12,091 32,128 11,575 55,794 32,785 92,401 13,809 138,995

Off & On 21,728 7,987 16,470 46,185 1,262 5,588 13,344 20,194 1,244 3,377 7,745 12,366Total 1,060,323 517,147 815,602 2,393,072 1,089,362 577,339 1,048,264 2,714,965 1,054,272 605,232 885,525 2,545,029

2,794,093 1,296,470 1,672,499 5,763,062 3,117,639 1,393,622 1,993,608 6,504,869 2,984,025 1,434,803 1,804,163 6,222,991Share of Lae and Port Moresby 48.5% 22.5% 29.0% 100.0% 47.9% 21.4% 30.6% 100.0% 48.0% 23.1% 29.0% 100.0%

Break Bulk

Palm Oil

Bulk Fuel

Year

Description

Total

2007 2008 2009

Overseas

Coastal

Container

Break Bulk

Palm Oil

Bulk Fuel

Container


2-26

2.1.3 Air Transport Sector

1) Overall Transport Sector Structure

Figure 2.1-7 illustrates the general structure of the institutions in the transport sector at national level.

Parliament Shareholders/Owners

Minister(Transport, Works. Civil Aviation)

Minister(SOEs. Civil Aviation)

Secretary Board/Authority/Council Board/Directors Board/Directors/Owners

Departmental Officers Executive Management Executive Management Executive Management

Government Departments(DOT, DOW)

Statutory Authorities(CASA, AIC, etc.)

State-Owned Corporations(NAC, PNGASL, Air

Niugini, etc.)

Transport and Construction Companies

Policy, Planning and Legislation Matters

Public

Commercial OperationsPrivate

Figure 2.1-7 Institutional Structure of the Transport Sector


The Department of Transport (DOT) has the primary responsibility for the transport sector, headed by the Secretary for Transport under the Minister. Within the DOT, there are divisions for policy development, planning and monitoring of sector expenditure, liaison with and assistance to the provinces, and modal divisions for land transport, maritime, air traffic regulation and air services licensing, aviation security and maritime security. The Department of Works (DOW) has responsibility within the Government for managing the national road assets, in particular contract management for road construction and maintenance. It also has responsibility for engineering standards, for some engineering technical services and maintains a capacity for direct engineering works for emergency reinstatements and in remote areas.


2-27

There are five authorities in the sector; the National Roads Authority (NRA), National Road Safety Council (NRSC), National Maritime Safety Authority (NMSA), Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and Accident Investigation Commission (AIC).

There are five State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) including NAC. The SOEs are expected to operate on commercial basis, deriving their revenue from charges made for the services that they provide. In practice there is a degree of reliance on Government financial support for capital works and operations for most of the SOEs, as full cost recovery is not currently achieved. In part this is due to the expectation by Government that the SOEs responsible for port, airport and air services will support non-commercial parts of their operations by internal cross-subsidy, as an informal community service obligation. (Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

2) Air Transport Sector Institutions

Figure 2.1-8 shows the present structure of the government agencies in civil aviation. There has been recent reform of the agencies, separating the safety regulation from delivery of air traffic and airport services.

Minister for Transport Minister for Civil Aviation

Secretary for TransportNational Airports

Corporation (NAC) Board

PNG Air Services Ltd. (PNGASL) Board

Accident Investigation Commission (AIC)

DOT Policy & Planning Wing

DOT Air Transportation Division CASA Executive PNGASL Executive

- Ministerial advice- Policy and Planning- Sector Monitoring- Budget Coordination

DOT Transport Secretary Unit

Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Board

NAC Executive AIC Executive

- Air transport regulation- International air agreement negotiation- Air service licensing

- Policy and regulatory enforcement for aviation security

- Civil aviation safety regulatory enforcement and monitoring- Airport and aerodrome operation certification- Air crew certification- Airlines certification- Air traffic controller training and certification

- Provision of air navigation and airways services

- Maintenance, development and asset management of national government owned airports

- Investigation of the circumstances and causes of air accidents and incidents with a view to future prevention

Figure 2.1-8 Institutional Structure of Air Transport Sector


The governing legislation is the “Civil Aviation Act 2000”, which is shortly to be amended to reflect all of the institutional changes, for which the minister of civil aviation is the responsible minister.


2-28

The DOT provides ministerial advisory services and policy and planning input to the air transport sector. The Air Transport Division (ATD) of DOT is responsible for the negotiation and administration of international air service licensing agreements for overseas carriers to provide services into and through Papua New Guinea. ATD is also responsible for issuing air services licenses to carriers.

The Transport Security Unit within DOT is responsible for developing security policy and for ensuring that PAPUA NEW GUINEA complies with international conventions and agreements relating to aircraft, air service, air passenger and air cargo security both externally and internally.

The recently formed Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the principal regulatory agency in the sector and is responsible for safety certification of air operators, aircraft, air crew, air traffic controllers and airports. It ensures that PAPUA NEW GUINEA complies with international air safety conventions under ICAO.

PNG Air Services Ltd. (PNGASL) is the SOE responsible for providing, maintaining and developing air navigation and airways services infrastructure, comprising ground and satellite based navigation systems and management of the upper, middle and lower airspace, including overflying. PNGASL also coordinates aviation search and rescue.

National Airports Corporation (NAC) is the SOE responsible for the provision, maintenance and development of 21 national government owned airports, including aviation security, airport fire crash and rescue services and control of ground movements of aircraft and other airport vehicles and equipment.

The Accident Investigation Commission (AIC) is a recently formed body responsible for investigation of the circumstances of air accidents on a “no fault” basis with a view to future prevention. (Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

3) National Airports Corporation Ltd (NAC)

NAC was incorporated under the Companies Act 1997 and established under the Civil Aviation Amendment Act 2010 as a state owned commercial enterprise for the purposes of owning, operating, managing and maintaining airports and providing all related services in Papua New Guinea.

NAC undertakes airport master planning and feasibility studies for airport development in coordination with DOT and consistent with the National Transport Strategy (NTS) and Medium Term Transport Plan (MTTP), and is responsible for the implementation of the agreed works, with capital funding provided from sources agreed with the Government.


2-29

NAC is also the primary agency for setting airport operational and engineering standards and practices and, on a fee-for-service basis, provides airport engineering, asset management and technical advisory services to the provinces for the upkeep of provincial airports and rural airstrips under provincial, local level government and local community ownership, in accordance with Government’s Community Service Obligation (CSO) policy. No substantive change is envisaged to NAC’s institutional structure over the period of NTS. (Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

Budget, financial situation and organization of NAC is presented in Section 10.


2-30

4) National Airports

Port Moresby International Airport (PMIA or Jacksons) is currently the only airport in Papua New Guinea supporting international regular scheduled passenger services, although both Daru and Wewak are denoted as international airport and, outside of PMIA, Mount Hagen receives the most international passengers associated with international direct charters for the mining ventures. PMIA and a further 20 national airports are operated by the National Airports Corporation (NAC). A further six airports are certified in accordance with ICAO Annex 14 and PAPUA NEW GUINEA Civil Aviation Rules; these include three airports associated with mining (OK Tedi – Tabubil and Lihir – Kunaye) and oil & gas (Kutubu – Moro) and three ex-national airports now operated by provincial governments (Milne Bay PG – Kiriwina and Misima, and Gulf PG – Kikori). Table 2.1-13 shows summary of ICAO recognized airports and Table 2.1-14 shows air traffic at main airports.

Table 2.1-13 Summary of ICAO Recognized Airports

(Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)


2-31

Table 2.1-14 Air Traffic at Main Airports

(Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)


2-32

5) Air Transport Operators and Services

a) International

The main international carrier is the government-owned airline Air Niugini (ANG) which operates bulk of international services and routes. ANG currently operates B767-300AER, Fokker F100 and Bombardier Q400 aircraft on its international services.

International scheduled services currently operating at Port Moresby are:

Air Niugini; Singapore, Brisbane, Cairns, Nandi, Honiara, Hong Kong, Manila, Narita and Sydney.

Qantas Link; Cairns. Virgin Australia; Brisbane. (Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

Figure 2.1-10 shows the share of the international destinations to/from Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport based on the Air Niugini passenger seats available.

Figure 2.1-10 Shares of International Flights to/from Jacksons/Port Moresby Airport

Source: Flight Schedule of Air Niugini

Figure 2.1-9 Networks to/from Port Moresby


2-33

b) Domestic

Air Niugini and Airlines PNG operate domestic services primarily from their hub of Port Moresby. Air Niugini flies point-to-point services to 11 main domestic airports, two loop services to the Islands and Momase Regions covering a further nine airports and some interconnecting services from the regional airports of Lae, Hoskins and Madang. Airlines PNG operates first and second level services using mainly Dash-8, competing against Air Niugini but also serving smaller airports from hubs at Daru and Port Moresby covering Western and Central Provinces using DHC-6. Airlines PNG also flies on-demand and charter services to a number of smaller airports. A new entrant, privately owned Travel Air, based in Madang, was certified to commence operations in November 2011 using four Fokker F50 turboprop aircraft. Initially operating daily scheduled flights between Madang and Port Moresby, Hoskins and Rabaul it has signaled its intention to operate to a number of other main centers and secondary airports. The Government, through Department of National Planning and Monitoring (DNPM), provided startup financial assistance to Travel Air in the 2011 budget allocation described as an air freight subsidy. The Airline fills a gap left by the closure of Airline in 2007, also Madang-based. The largest third level operator is Mission Aviation Fellowship (MAF), a church-sponsored airline, based in Mount Hagen, with a fleet of 16 mainly DHC-6, Cessna 206 and GA8 with which it serves remote rural airstrips throughout Papua New Guinea, but concentrated in the Highlands, for community support, mission, and emergency relief purposes, as well as commercial passengers and freight. Other small fixed wing and helicopter charter operators include Central Aviation (Mt. Hagen), Hevilift, Islands Nationair, Niugini Helicopters, North Coast Aviation (Lae), Pacific Helicopters and Tropicair (Port Moresby). Much of their work is in support of the resource sector but also general charter flying into small airfields and remote worksites. (Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

Figure 2.1-11 presents domestic air networks at Jacksons/Port Moresby and Nadzab/Lae Airports.


2-34

Figure 2.1-11 Domestic Air Network Source: Flight Schedule of each airline

Network to/from Port Moresby Airport Network to/from Lae Airport

Airlines PNG

Air Niugini

Travel Air


Airlines PNG

Air Niugini

Travel Air



2-35

c) Aircraft Fleet of Air Niugini, Airlines PNG, Travel Air and North Coast Aviation

[Air Niugini]

Aircraft Current Ordered Typical Seats

B767-33AER 3 - 214

B787-8 - 2 242

B737-800 2 - 160

B737-700 1 - 128

Fokker F100 6 - 98

Q400 NextGen 5 - 74

Q400 1 - 70

Dash 8-Q315 4 - 50

DHC-8-202 4 - 36

Fokker F70 - Being considered. 75

Data: Air Niugini

[Airlines PNG]


Dash-8-102 14 (These will be exited as the ATR’s

are entered into service.) 36

ATR 72 - 12 72

Data: Air Lines PNG

[Travel Air]


Fokker F50 4 - 58

[North Coast Aviation]


BN-2A islander 2 - 9


2-36

6) Passenger Movements Record at Jacksons/Port Moresby and Nadzab/Lae Airports

a) Jacksons/Port Moresby Airport

The historical international passengers at Jacksons/Port Moresby Airport for the last decade are shown in Table 2.1-15 and Figure 2.1-12. The international passengers were stagnant until 2005, but increased drastically thereafter by an annual average growth rate of 9%.

The historical domestic passengers at Port Moresby Airport for the last decade are shown in Table 2.1-16 and Figure 2.1-13. The domestic passengers increased drastically after 2006 by an annual average growth rate of 14%.

Passengers Change2003 5342004 570 6.7%2005 597 4.7%2006 624 4.5%2007 717 14.9%2008 820 14.4%2009 1,025 25.0%2010 1,089 6.2%2011 1,156 6.2%2012 1,350 16.8%

YearPort Moresby

Passengers Change2003 2642004 257 -2.9%2005 260 1.2%2006 279 7.3%2007 294 5.7%2008 341 15.8%2009 357 4.7%2010 374 4.7%2011 427 14.3%2012 485 13.5%

YearPort Moresby

Table 2.1-15 Historical International Passengers

Figure 2.1-12 Historical International Passenger Movements

Source: JICA report in 2013 Source: JICA report in 2013

Table 2.1-16 Historical Domestic Passenger Movements

Figure 2.1-13 Historical Domestic Passengers Source: Air Niugini, Airlines PNG

Source: Air Niugini, Airlines PNG


2-37

b) Nadzab/Lae Airport

The historical domestic passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport for the last decade are shown in Table 2.1-17 and Figure 2.1-14. The domestic passengers increased by an annual average growth rate of 8% in the last 10 years.

Passengers Change2003 1502004 154 2.7%2005 167 8.4%2006 169 1.2%2007 198 17.2%2008 221 11.6%2009 239 8.1%2010 264 10.5%2011 280 6.1%2012 296 5.7%

YearLae

Table 2.1-17 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab

Figure 2.7 Historical Domestic Passengers




Figure 2.1-14 Historical Domestic Passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport


2-38

2.1.4 Air Transport Infrastructure Funding

1) Generally

Transport infrastructure is funded from a mix of following sources:

Parliamentary appropriations through the national budget process to the Government transport agencies including NAC;

Multinational (ADB, World Bank) and bilateral (Australia, Japan, China, etc.) donor funds; Charges made by PNG Ports Corporation, National Airports Corporation, PNG Air Services

Ltd and the National Maritime Safety Authority which go towards the maintenance and upkeep of ports, airport, maritime and air navigation infrastructure. (Abstract from National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy)

2) Airports and Air Navigation Services and Expenditure

According to the National Transport Strategy Volume 3: Detailed Strategy, following observation was made on the expenditures for the airports:

i) The Civil Aviation Authority was funded by an average of K10 million per annum over the five year period to 2009 from the Development Budget to undertake airport and airstrip upgrading. From 2011 responsibility for national airport maintenance and development was transferred to the National Airports Corporation (NAC) with an annual appropriation of K30 million increasing to over K70 million annually on average in future years against the loan funded Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (CADIP);

ii) National airport maintenance is funded from NAC revenue. Ongoing maintenance requirements for the 21 national airports certified to existing usage (F100/Q400 and Dash-8) are estimated at around K20 million annually to cover periodic resealing, airfield, terminal and fencing maintenance. However, maintenance costs will rise substantially in future in real terms as some airports are upgraded to larger jet aircraft (B737-800) or if an alternate B747 capable airport for Port Moresby is developed at Lae or elsewhere. Even at present, NAC’s ability to adequately fund maintenance of all 21 national airports is in some doubt.

NAC derives revenues from landing, terminal navigation and service charges, subject to payment of part of the terminal fees to CASA. The level of charges is set out in the Civil Aviation (Aircraft Charges) Regulation.

In 2009, a National Airports Strategic Management Plan (NASMP) was prepared on behalf of the then CAA. One of the findings from the NASMP was a shortfall in funding for airport maintenance and critical upgrading requirements. While split into NAC, CASA and PNGASL had the effect of removing some previously second level national airports from NAC’s responsibility, and the CADIP has effectively shifted the critical rehabilitation and development


2-39

expenditure to the Government, there is still ongoing uncertainty as to whether NAC’s revenue stream will be sufficient to fund airport operations and ongoing maintenance commitments.

NASMP recommended that a detailed review of airport services charges, and air services charges generally, be made against forward operating and maintenance costs, so that either any shortfall can be identified and recognized as an ongoing subsidy obligation on the Government, or the charges are raised to cover the costs. It was also recommended that NAC explore other non-aeronautical revenue streams, such as airport concessions, airport land leases, airport terminal car parking fees and commercial development on NAC land to lessen the reliance on aircraft landing fees and terminal charges. NTS endorses this course of action and it is assumed that this combination of measures will enable NAC to significantly increase its revenue stream and operate profitably, assuming that capital development costs are born by the Government.

Following NASMP recommendations, NAC has been working to raise the total revenue and the amount of revenues from the airport operations increased PGK 42 million in 2010 to PGK 77 million in 2013 while the revenues from the commercial lease increased from PGK 4 million in 2010 to PGK 14 million in 2013 (refer to Sub Section 10.3). According to the result of the financial analysis, the expected revenue increase attributable to the implementation of the Project could cover the operation and maintenance costs relative to the Project, although the revenues are not enough to payback the expected ODA loan. Therefore, NAC would be able to provide necessary fund for operation and maintenance of Nadzab Airport.


2-40

2.1.5 Air Transport Sector Projects

1) Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (CADIP)

Considering the crucial importance of the aviation industry in Papua New Guinea, the Government in March 2009 formally requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to support it with financial assistance to enable to address its development challenges in the civil aviation sector. After technical examination, coordination and negotiation, the Civil Aviation Development Investment Program (CADIP) was developed and adopted by the Government to revitalize and maintain the country’s civil aviation network.

According to a document prepared by ADB, “The investment program (Civil Aviation Development Invest Program) will deal mainly with 21 national airports,-Buka, Chimbu, Daru, Goroka, Gurney, Hoskins, Kavieng, Kerema, Kiunga, Lae (Nadzab), Madang, Mendi, Momote, Mount Hagen, Popendetta, Port Moresby, Tari, Tokua, Vanimo, Wapenamanda and Wewak-which sustain the bulk of the country’s international and domestic passengers and freight traffic. It will involve (i) devoting four or more tranches of the Multitranche Financing Facility (MFF) to improving compliance with the safety and security standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization; (ii) designing and supervising airport improvements, and preparing and administering long-term maintenance contracts for all the national airports; and (iii) monitoring the socioeconomic benefits from the operating and maintenance improvements in the national airports. The investment program will also work closely with the capacity building program under the Transport Sector Support Program financed by the Australian Agency for International Development. (ADB Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility: Papua New Guinea: Civil Aviation Development Investment Program October 2009)”

According to ADB document and National Transport Strategy, CADIP will be implemented in four phases, while Phase I being implemented involves improvement of following five airports:

i) Port Moresby (domestic apron, CNS/ATM, fire tenders); ii) Mount Hagen Stage 1 (runway repair, new terminal);

iii) Hoskins Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence); iv) Wewak Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence); and v) Gurney Stage 1 (runway repair, security fence).

Table 2.1-18 shows investment program for the entire CADIP and Project 1 investment plan, while Figure 2.1-15 shows location of five airports improved under CADIP Project 1.


2-41

Table 2.1-18 Investment Program and Investment Plan for Project 1

Figure 2.1-15 Location of Five Airports improved under CADIP Project 1 (Source: ADB)


2-42

In principle, any projects those ranked high priority in Transport Infrastructure Priority Study (TIPS) and those rated with Benefit Cost Ratio (BC) of more than 1 were listed. Upgrading of Lae to alternate for PMIA (rated as TIPS BCR of 1.1) was included in CADIP Project 2 as shown below (estimated cost of Kina 139 million).

Table 2.1-19 Projected Funding Requirements for National Airports (up to CADIP Project 2)

Airport and Upgrade TIPS*1

Priority

TIPS

BCR*2

Cost

MK*3 2010

Annual Distribution of Cost

‘11-‘15 ‘16-‘20 ‘21-‘25 ‘26-‘30

CADIP-PPP and other funding

Upgrading PMIA (Master Plan) 3.9 975 165 621 210 16

CADIP Project 1 - 85% ADB, 15% Government Funding

Security fencing (5 airports) high high 28 28

PMIA domestic apron, ILS Fire high high 36 36

Upgrading to F100 operations

Wewak 2 2.9 35 35

Mt. Hagen 3 1.9 101 101

Hoskins (Kimbe) 4 1.7 52 52

Gurney - - 21 21

CADIP Project 2 - 85% ADB, 15% Government Funding

Security fencing (2 airports) high high 13 13

Upgrading to Alternate for PMIA

Lae 1.1 139 - 139

Upgrading to F100 operations

Madang 5 1.3 79 79

Kavieng 1 3.7 57 57

Goroka - - 46 46

Tokua - - 70 35 35

Note. *1TIPS: Transport Infrastructure Priority Study, *2BCR: Benefit Cost Ratio, *3MK: Million Kina Source: National Transport Strategy Volume 3, July 2013


2-43

2) CNS/ATM Modernization Project by PNGASL

In response to a request from JICA Survey Team, in May 2014 PNG Air Services Ltd (PNGASL) provided following paper describing CNS/ATM Modernization Project undertaken by PNGASL for possible coordination for the rehabilitation of Nadzab Airport.

“ DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS-NADZAB PURPOSE

This information paper outlining PNGASL’s development projects and plans at the Nadzab Airport is put together for the purpose of JICA. As JICA intends to fund the new Terminal Building and other supporting infrastructure at Nadzab Airport, this paper could also be used for the purpose of the Nadzab Airport supporting infrastructure development.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Since early planning documentation going back to 2010, PNGASL is now implementing component projects based on its Communications, Navigations, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) Modernization Project, which is based on PNGASL’s Strategic Development Plan 2011-2015. PNGASL’s preferred option of a holistic modernization project is not practical due to a lack of a single source of funding. The modernization is therefore undertaken in system component projects based on donor funding allocations. The three main agencies providing funds to support PNGASL CNS/ATM Modernization Program are the Government of PAPUA NEW GUINEA through annual Public Investment Program (PIP) Budget, Australian Aid and ADB MFF through the Civil Aviation Development Improvement Program (CADIP). This information paper outlines PNGASL’s ongoing development projects and plans at the Nadzab Airport. The underpinning modernization project PNGASL is undertaking in delivering safe, efficient and seamless air navigation services across PAPUA NEW GUINEA Flight Information Region (FIR) with our neighboring air navigation service providers (ANSP’s) is the modernization of the air traffic management (ATM) system and its associated communication, navigation and surveillance (CNS) infrastructure. The submission for the funding of ATM Modernization Project has been annually made to the Government of PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

PROJECTS SUMMARY REPORT

Tabulated below (Table 2.1-20) is a summary of all the development projects, highlighting scope of works at Nadzab Airport.


2-44

Table 2.1-20 Summary of CNS/ATM Modernization Projects and Activities at Nadzab Airport as of May 2014 No. Project Name Funding Agency Project Scope Status Activity Plan at Nadzab

1 PNG ADS-B, MLAT

and ATM System

(PAMAS)

GoPNG*1 &

DFAT*2

Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast

(ADS-B) for surveillance for upper airspace

over whole of PNG airspace.

Multilateration (MLAT) surveillance for

Jacksons Airport terminal airspace.

ATM automation.

Voice Communication System (VCS) upgrade.

Air Traffic Control (ATC) simulator and

disaster recovery.

Tower simulator.

Supply contract

signed March 2014.

Ready for

implementation.

Install Voice Communication System

(VCS) in Tower & Tower Equipment

Room.

Scope to include ADS-B ground

station.

Scope to replace Controller Console in

Tower.

2 World Geodetic Survey

to 1984 datum

(WGS-84) survey

TSSP*3 & DFAT Aeronautical survey of all airports and radio

navigational aids to WGS-84 datum.

Survey in progress. Survey of Nadzab Airport.

3 Very High Frequency

(VHF) Coverage

Improvements 1

TSSP & DFAT Upgrade existing remote Mt. Konokalang

VHF communication facility.

Install 4 new remote VHF facilities; Mt.

Mission, Mt. Otto, Mt. Dimondimo & Mt.

Fala.

Implement VSAT Network as a redundant

communication network for all PNGASL

remote sites and ATC stations.

On tender. Replace Very Small Aperture Terminal

(VSAT) Node.

Interface VCS to VSAT and tertiary

lines (Telikom).

4 High Frequency (HF) GoPNG (ADB) Construct new duplicate HF facility at Nadzab Drafting Install new duplicated HF farm at tow


2-45

No. Project Name Funding Agency Project Scope Status Activity Plan at Nadzab

Refurbishments Airport specifications. identified sites within the aerodrome

boundary.

Install standby power system at HF

farm.

5 Control Tower

Refurbishment

GoPNG Refurbish control towers; Port Moresby,

Nadzab & Madang.

Seeking funding. Building refurbishment of Control

Tower Cabin.

6 Power Systems

Upgrade

PNGASL Upgrade standby power supply system at Port

Moresby, Nadzab & Madang.

Upgrade standby power system; diesel

generator and UPS. Nadzab

generator has been replaced.

Standby power reticulation to

VOR/DME. HF Transmitter and HF

Receiver.

7 Radar GoPNG Replace existing Secondary Surveillance

Radar.

Drafting Nil

8 VHF Improvements 2 GoPNG (ADB) Upgrade existing remote VHF communication

facilities.

Drafting

specifications.

Nil

Notes: GoPNG*1: Government of Papua New Guinea, DFAT*2: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, TSSP*3: Transport Sector Support Program


2-46

2.2 Morobe Province and Lae

2.2.1 Morobe Province

Morobe Province, where Nadzab/Lae Airport is located, is one of the Papua New Guinean Provinces in Momase Region surrounded by the Solomon Sea (Huon Gulf) to the east, Madang Province to the north, East Highlands Province and Gulf Province to the west, Central and Northern Provinces to the south. Its capital is the City of Lae.

According to the Census 2011, the population of Morobe Province was the biggest among 23 provinces accounting for 9.3 % of the total population (see Table 2.1-1).

Provincial Administration of Morobe describes its economy as follows:

Figure 2.2-1 Map of Morobe Province

“The economy of Morobe Province is robust, growing at an average of 2.7 percent per annum. The economy in Morobe is better than it has been for many years related to the development of new gold mines, new fisheries projects, new agricultural projects like oil palm and new government initiatives such as district treasuries. The rural Morobe is endowed with rich natural resources and diverse flora and fauna. Traditional economic activities are coffee, cocoa, cattle, logging, while the emerging activities are; gold, copper, tuna fishing, oil. Lae being the second biggest city is the industrial center of Papua New Guinea and is where the largest export port in PAPUA NEW GUINEA is located. Business investments in Lae are mostly controlled by members of the Lae Chamber of Commerce and Industries. The business activities they engaged in are; mechanizing, wholesale, cartage, hotel industries, real estate, food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, banking, legal, accountings and business consultancy, electrical works, building, shipping, airlines industries, motor vehicle and fuels. The economic prospects for Lae in the next couple of years will be boasted by the mining activities in the two potential mines in Bulolo district; the Hamata and Hidden Valley and Wafi Golpu Gold and Copper mines. These mines will be mined by Morobe Mining Joint Ventures Ltd and the tuna industries by Frabelle (PNG) Ltd. Palm Oil is another potential investment now emerging. Tourism development is untapped and has great potential for prospects. Lae and Morobe Province contributes


2-47

immensely to the economy of Papua New Guinea and will continue in many years ahead. Increase economic activity and population growth makes Lae the most ideal place in Papua New Guinea to invest. (Source: Morobe Province Government Website)”

Morobe Province Government published its Five Year Strategic Development Plan 2008-2012. Following six policy areas were identified:

i) Infrastructure development; ii) Sustainable economic growth and development;

iii) Integral human development; iv) Rural growth and development centers; v) Good governance; and

vi) National functions, emergency and other support services.

Regarding the infrastructure development, goal was set to achieve facilitation of effective transport, communication, power generation and water supply systems for effective and efficient production and delivery of goods and services by improvement of access through air, land and sea transport system, among others. Figure 2.2-2 shows provincial fiscal capacity in 2012. The fiscal capacity means provincial ability to raise own-source revenue relative to what the governments’ National Economic and Fiscal Commission estimates it should cost the province to deliver 11 minimum priority activities such as provision of school materials, supervision of education staff, district education office operations, rural health facility operation, etc. Morobe Province had its fiscal capacity to cover more than 100% of 11 minimum priority activities at its own source revenue probably due to high amount of royalty, and was ranked third following Western Province and New Ireland Province. Figure 2.2-2 2012 Provincial Fiscal Capacity (Source: Asian Development Outlook 2014-Papua New Guinea)


2-48

2.2.2 City of Lae

The City of Lae is the capital of Morobe Province where PAPUA NEW GUINEA’s largest sea port of Lae and the second busiest Nadzab Airport are located. Its population in 2011 Census was 148,934. Explanation of Lae in “Made in PNG 2014” published by Business Advantage International Pty Ltd., Australia, is presented hereunder:

“Although it plays second fiddle to the national capital, Port Moresby, Lae is PNG’s industrial hub, with considerable activity in the sectors of manufacturing, trading, agribusiness, and, more recently, fishery. Many of PNG largest producers have their head offices in Lae, including K K Kingston, Laga Industries, Mainland Holdings and (100km away) Ramu Agri-Industries, as well as the local subsidiaries of international firms such as Nestle SA, Coca-Cola Amatil, DuluxGroup and PNG Taiheiyo Cement.

Unsurprisingly, PNG’s recent resources boom, spearheaded by the Exxon Mobile-led PNG LNG Project, has had a considerable impact on Lae. The city has not only sent thousands of tons of goods and equipment up the Highlands Highway to PNG’s gas field, but is also 90km from the Hidden Valley gold mine and 65km from the Wafi-Golpu project, a gold silver and copper project of significant potential.

A major local fisheries sector has sprung up over the past decade with major processing facilities constructed by Frabelle (Philippines), International Food Corporation (Malaysia) and Majestic Foods (Thailand).

The good times have also encouraged PNG’s larger manufacturers to make sizable new investment in Lae, including S P Brewery, K K Kingston and Lae Biscuit Company.

With its central location, access to the Highlands Highway, and port facilities, it is a natural industrial hub. Nowadays, between 60% and 70% of all PNG’s trade passes through Lae, including 90% of coffee export.”


2-49

2.3 Existing Conditions of Nadzab/Lae Airport

2.3.1 General Role of Nadzab Airport in Domestic Air Network

Nadzab Airport is the second busiest airport in Papua New Guinea, being operated by National Airports Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “NAC”), except for the radio navigational aids and telecommunications which are under responsibility of Papua New Guinea Air Services Ltd. (PNGASL). As of May 2014, four airlines of Air Niugini, Airline PNG and Travel Air as well as North Coast Aviation are operating at Nadzab Airport, carrying approximately 300 thousand passengers in 2013. It seems that there are two patterns of route structure; shuttle flights between Nadzab and Port Moresby/Jacksons as well as flights connecting Jacksons and local airports via Nadzab as shown below.

Admiralty Island

New Guinea Island

New Britain Islands

Port Moresby(POM)

Lae(LAE)

Momote(MAS)

Hoskins(HKN)

Rabaul(RAB)

Popondetta(PNP)

Kiunga(UNG)

Mount Hagen(HGU)

Wewak(WWK)

Madang(MAG)

Tabubik(TBG)

Bulolo(BUL)

Finschhafen(FIN)

Figure 2.3-1 Schematic Air Network of Nadzab/Lae Airport

Currently, Nadzab Airport accommodates the domestic passenger flights only; however National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030 states “International airports may also be required near cities such as Lae that are an important hub for international business”.


2-50

2.3.2 Existing Airport Facilities

1) Generally

The existing conditions and major issues to be sorted out of Nadzab/Lae Airport are briefly discussed hereunder for understanding of the project background. Photos below show general layout of Nadzab Airport.

Photo1-1 Entire Airport

Photo 1-2 Terminal Area

Terminal

Control Tower

Fire Station

NAC Office

Taxiway B Taxiway C Taxiway D Taxiway A

Terminal

Main Apron

Car Park

Fire Station

Control Tower

NAC Office Second Apron

Third Apron

Photo：Google

Photo：Google


2-51

2) Runway, Taxiway and Apron

There exist a runway, a parallel taxiway and four stub (connection) taxiways as well as a main apron at Nadzab Airport as summarized below:

Runway; 2438-m long 30-m wide, elevation approximately 73m, PCN30/F/B/X/U with groove.

Taxiway (parallel and stub); 15-m wide, of asphalt concrete. Apron; 420m×85m wide for 6 aircraft parking stands, of asphalt concrete.

There are several issues to be resolved as discussed hereunder.

[Pavement Strength] The runway, taxiways and apron were constructed to accommodate F28 (65 to 89-seater aircraft), which already retired and was replaced by F100 and Q400, etc. in Papua New Guinea. In near future when the airport traffic further increases, operation of B737 will become necessary. Currently, some deficiencies such as surface cracks are observed on the runway surface as shown below. The existing airfield pavement needs to be strengthened and/or rehabilitated.

（RWY 27 threshold from western side）（Cracks on the runway surface with groove）

[Length and Width (Dimension)] The present runway length of 2438m is adequate to accommodate domestic and short-haul international operations by B737; however the runway should be widened from present 30m to 45m. The present taxiway width of 15m is adequate to accommodate up to B737 type aircraft, but it might need to be widened to accommodate sporadic operation of B767/B787 in case of diversion from Port Moresby. Expansion of the apron will also be required.


2-52

3) Passenger and Cargo Terminal Building

The existing passenger terminal building, constructed in around 1976, houses Air Niugini, Airline PNG and Travel Air as well as North Coast Aviation. Air cargo is also handled in the same building. The existing terminal building is of a steel structure like a gymnasium, and walls inside the terminal are made of blocks and light-weight steel. As the walls do not reach the ceiling, rain comes into the building through openings outside the building for ventilation, resulting in deterioration of the ceiling. Existing baggage claim area is provided after the arrival lounge and the checked bags are manually delivered to the passengers (see photos 2-1 and 2-2).

The existing arrival and departure lobbies are provided in the same place (see photo 2-3). Check-in counters of Air Niugini are located right after the entrance to the restricted area (see photo 2-4). Access by the general public to the shop near the entrance to the terminal is allowed but the air passengers only are allowed to enter into the restricted area after the security check counter. A canopy is provided to the terminal curb where a dropping-off area for hotel buses, the major airport access, is provided (see photos 3-1).

Cargo handling areas for Air Niugini and Airline PNG are located on both sides of the terminal building (see photo 3-2). A security check point is provided at the entrance to the terminal restricted area but no security check equipment is provided and screening is being carried out manually (see photo 3-4).

Currently, no CIQ facility is provided at Nadzab Airport. In case international flights are to be operated, necessary facilities are to be provided and personnel to be stationed through coordination with authorities concerned.

Many of the existing services are in very poor condition as almost 40 years have passed since they were constructed and adequate fund for repair and maintenance is not available.


2-53

Photo 2-1: Arrival Lounge Photo 2-2: Baggage Claim

Photo 2-3: Arrival and Departure Lobbies Photo 2-4: Check-in Counters of Air Niugini

1

3

2

4

Landside


2-54

Photo 3-1: Curb Side and Dropping-off Area Photo 3-2: Cargo Handling Area

Photo 3-3: Passenger Entrance to Terminal Photo 3-4: Security Check

1 3

2

4

Landside


2-55

4) CNS/ATM

Doppler VOR/DME is provided as the radio navigation aid at Nadzab on the extended runway center line to the western side of the Airport, but ILS is not installed.

（Control Tower） (DVOR/DME commissioned in 2011）

Weather minima of VOR/DME approach procedures for category C aircraft are as follows: RWY09：Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) 650FT, Visibility 2300m RWY27：Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) 650FT, Visibility 2400m

According to the PNGASL staff of Nadzab Airport, weather conditions at Nadzab are generally favorable and flight cancellation/delay due to downgraded weather conditions below the minima rarely occurs (except for delays due to problems of airlines side). This issue is further discussed in Section 5.ATC communications and automatic weather observation system are provided in the control tower.

The existing control tower was built in around 1976. It is located almost equidistant from the runway ends and good visibility to the runway ends and apron is achievable. However, the building is old and outdated, and the ceiling is partially exfoliated (see photo on the right side) and trace of water leakage is observed on the wall.

5) Aeronautical Ground Lights

Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGLs) are to provide visual guidance to aircraft pilots especially during nighttime and low visibility conditions. In addition to the apron flood lights, there are following aeronautical ground lighting at Nadzab Airport under responsibility of NAC:

Two sets of Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI); Runway lights; Taxiway centerline light (partially); and Aerodrome beacon.


2-56

List of the lighting facilities is provided in Section 5.

6) Rescue and Fire-fighting Station

The existing rescue and fire-fighting station is faced perpendicular to the runway center line, preventing immediate access to the runway in case of emergency. The building is old and outdated. The fire alert/monitoring/communication as well as water pump systems for fire trucks are not properly working. In order to meet relevant ICAO requirements, the existing rescue and fire-fighting station should be reconstructed. There are two second hand fire engines transferred from Jacksons and Australia. They are old but still reliable, however constant maintenance is needed to keep them operational. The current category of rescue and fire-fighting services is 6, which will need to be upgraded to 7.

7) Access Road

The existing airport access road connecting the Highland Highway (between the City of Lae and Highland Area) and the airport is under the authority of NAC. The access road has two lanes each and is in generally good condition, but no storm water drainage facility was observed.

8) Operation and Maintenance Organization

There are 38 personnel of NAC for operation and maintenance of Nadzab Airport.

9) Risk of Flooding of Erap River

As official record of floods that affected the airport in the past were unavailable, it was found through interviews with stakeholders that the most memorable flood occurred in early 2000’s. In this flood, western edge of the airport was inundated by 30cm of water, however, runway and key facilities remained above water. The banks of Erap River have since overflown every 2~3 years, however, only areas close to the banks were inundated by water 30~50cm in depth, and for a short period of the time before subsiding at the end of the rain.

Rescue and Fire-fighting Station Fire Engines


2-57

2.3.3 Opinion of Business Leaders on Nadzab Airport

In order to gather opinion of the local business leaders on the existing and future Nadzab Airport, a briefing was held from 14:00 to 15:30 on Wednesday 21 May 2014 at Lae International Hotel. About 30 people attended the meeting, who are members of Lae Chamber of Commerce Inc. (LCCI) and the briefing was chaired by President of LCCI. A representative of NAC Headquarter and Nadzab Airport Manager as well as a representative of JICA Survey Team also attended the briefing meeting. Organizations to which the attendants belong are as follows:

LCCI ATTIC HOLDINGS NIUGINI SOLICOTORS & BARRISTER AIR NIUGINI ATLAS STEEL BRAIN BELL CHINA HARBOUR ENGINEERING CHEMCARE GROUP HBS HASTING DEERING ISLANDS PETROLEUM INLAND COMMUNICATION MOROBE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MOROBE MINIMG JOINT VENTURE NORTHBUIL CONSTRUCTION NO.1 HIRE CAR NATIONALS NEWS POST PNG SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL ENGINEERING TRUKAI INDUSTRIES

Erap River Nadzab Airport Erap River


2-58

Following opening remarks by the President of LCCI, brief description of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project was made by the representative of NAC and purpose of the meeting and questionnaire was briefly explained by the representative of JICA Survey Team, followed by free discussion session.

Almost all of the comments made during the free discussion were complaints against poor conditions of the existing facilities and services as well as requests for immediate rehabilitation/improvement thereof and commencement of international services between Nadzab/Lae and Australian destinations such as Cairns and Brisbane. NAC’s response to the complaints was that NAC recognizes an investment for non-fundamental rehabilitation of the existing facilities and services inefficient and such fund is not available; if local government/business community offers such fund for rehabilitation, NAC would welcome; NAC has been seeking fund for fundamental rehabilitation/improvement of Nadzab Airport and Japanese ODA through JICA is one of the most expected.

With regard to the questionnaire on the rehabilitation of Nadzab Airport, ten attendants responded as follows (figures shown in ( ) are the numbers of respondents):

[Answers to the Questionnaire]

1. Future Operations/Role of Nadzab/Lae Airport

One of the topics to be highlighted firstly is the future role of Nadzab/Lae Airport for local business/social sector in Morobe/Lae and also in the entire air transport network of the country. Currently, we understand that Nadzab/Lae Airport is a domestic trunk line airport (the second largest next to Port Moresby) connecting Port Moresby and several local cities (approximately 300,000 annual passenger movements recorded in 2013) mainly for business travelers with sporadic international pure cargo flights. Suppose about 10 years after from now, what kind of role do you anticipate that Nadzab Airport needs to play: [Domestic Passenger Operations] a) Second largest domestic trunk line airport after Port Moresby with domestic annual

passenger movements around 600 thousand (basically continuation of the current role); (2) b) Second domestic hub airport after Port Moresby with broader domestic air network with

domestic annual passenger movements around 900 thousand; (7) c) Others (please specify here: Manila, Hong Kong, Singapore and Bali). (1) [International Passenger Operations] d) Sporadic charter flights with Australian destinations such as Cairns and Brisbane; (0) e) Limited number of weekly scheduled international flights with Australian destinations by

propeller aircraft such as Q-400; (1) f) Limited number of weekly scheduled international flights with Australian destinations by


2-59

B737/Q-400; (4) g) Daily international flights with Australian destinations by B737/Q-400; (4) h) Others (please specify here). (2) [International Alternate Airport] Nadzab Airport is recognized as one of the candidate international alternate airports for Port Moresby. For Nadzab Airport to fulfill this role, more investment will be required than to accommodate domestic and international operations by up to B737 class aircraft. Do you think such additional investment would be: i) Acceptable because an alternate international airport is required for Papua New Guinea; (8) j) Acceptable if such additional investment is within the availability of financial resources for

implementation of the Project; (2) k) Not acceptable unless such additional investment is financially viable; (0) l) Others (please specify here) (0).

2. Prospective Customers/Users of Nadzab/Lae Airport

In the item 1 above, we discussed anticipated or expected future operations or role of Nadzab/Lae Airport. For Nadzab/Lae Airport to play such anticipated/expected role, it has to be supported by users/customers such as international/local business people, tourists, family visitors as well as the airlines, among others. Which do you think is the best source of future air traffic demand at Nadzab/Lae Airport? [Domestic] m) Business people/family visitors between Nadzab and Port Moresby; (4) n) Business people/tourists visiting other places from Port Moresby via Nadzab and vice versa;

(6) o) Others (please specify here) (2). [International] p) Business people/family visitors; (4) q) Foreigners working at mining sites or manufacturing factories near Lae; (3) r) Foreign tourists (please name some prospective tourist destinations near Nadzab) (1)

Pacific Island, Asia; s) Others (please specify here).

3. General Comments for Future of Nadzab Airport We welcome any comments from you on future of Nadzab Airport, strength to be enhanced and/or weakness to be improved, possible cooperation with Lae Sea Port, etc. The terminal needs a complete renovation, someone needs to responsible for its upkeep and

maintenance. The terminal needs to have better facilities including food and toilets. The highway between Lae and Nadzab needs to be considered as its lack of maintenance affects


2-60

travel time and personal security when travelling to the airport. We definitely need a second international airport. Internal and external security is very poor. Physical presence as well as electrical

equipment required. Procedures/Standard Operation Procedures to be identified. Nadzab Airport if developed into International Airport, I expect both domestic and

international passengers despite for provisions as alternative to Jacksons Airport. Nadzab is ideal commercially to become both international and domestic airport.

Need links with Singapore or Dubai as waypoint to Europe. Air freight terminal and other business facilities required. May wish to consider taxi services or security shuttle transfer.


2-61

2.3.4 Status and Role of Nadzab/Lae Airport in National Development Plans

1) National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

The National Development Strategy Plan (PNGDSP) 2010-2030 was formulated and published by Department of National Planning and Monitoring in March 2010 as the Guide to Success. It deals with important development strategy which will guide continued progress of Papua New Guinea in the next 20 years. Specifically regarding the air transport sector, compliance of regional airports with international certification requirements, upgrading of airports for higher seating capacity as well as rehabilitation of unused airstrips are presented as key indicators as shown below.

Source: National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

The number of domestic air travelers in the Southern Region (including Port Moresby) is estimated to be more than quadruple from 1 million passengers in 2010 to over 4 million passengers in 2030 as shown below.

Source: National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

It is also mentioned in PNGDSP that:


2-62

Alternatives to Jacksons airport are also required in the region with the capacity to handle large jets and international flights;

The growth of international tourism will require new international routes and appropriate airport infrastructure at key tourist destinations including Alotau, Rabaul, Madang and Manus;

International airports may also be required near cities such as Lae that are important hubs for international business;

Regional airlines amongst Pacific island countries should be encouraged as they promote closer regional integration; and

The liberalization of PAPUA NEW GUINEA’s air space and the promotion of a competitive airline market is vital for reducing the cost of travel and for improving service on domestic flights.

2) Medium-term Development Plan 2011-2015

The Medium-term Development Plan (MTDP) 2011-2015 is the first 5-year medium-term development plan for realization of the targets stipulated in PNGDSP.

It is stated in the Medium-term Development Plan 2011-2015 that: “Maintenance and rehabilitation of all national airports will be central for the MTDP 2011-2015. This will include navigational aids and communication and surveillance systems to ensure compliance with international operating standards. In addition, rehabilitation of rural airstrips will be undertaken to allow access to populated rural areas that are inaccessible by road or sea. Regional airports will be upgraded to allow higher seating capacity jets to cater for the anticipated increase in the number of passengers as a result of increased economic activities. With the timely support of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Government is investing close to K2.0 billion to rehabilitate and upgrade 22 national airports to comply with international safety and security standards and serve future needs. This will help to realize the majority of the deliverables. This program is implemented in three phases with the first phase in the MTDP 2011-2015.”

3) Expected Future Roles of Nadzab Airport

There is a clear reference to the role of Nadzab/Lae Airport in PNGDSP 2010-2030 that “International airports may also be required near cities such as Lae that are important hubs for international business.”

According to the National Transport Strategy Volume 3 Detailed Strategy dated July 2013, the “CAA Infrastructure Investment Plan, Long Term (2010-2030) (LTIP), (CAA, 2009)”, endorsed by the National Executive Committee (NEC), is the most recent definition of a long term strategy for upgrading the national airports, now under the management of NAC.


2-63

With reference to Nadzab/Lae Airport in LTIP, Nadzab was expected to be: i) One of two long range international airports as an alternate diversion airport for PMIA;

and ii) Upgraded to medium range regional standard by 2030.

Definition of Nadzab Airport as the alternate airport for PMIA does not automatically mean becoming a long range international airport, but necessitates a minimum upgrading of airport facilities such as the strengthening of the aircraft pavement, widening of the taxiways, among others, to accommodate the largest aircraft (B767/B787) with an operational take-off weight necessary to fly to Port Moresby.

With regard to the item ii) above, it can be construed that Nadzab should be upgraded as a regional airport capable of accommodating medium range aircraft such as B737-800 in compliance with relevant international standards and recommendations.

In summary, it is considered reasonable to assume future role of Nadzab/Lae Airport as one of the regional airports:

Capable of accommodating short to medium range international and domestic operations by B737-800 class aircraft;

Alternative to Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport in case of its temporary closure due to bad weather, etc.

SECTION 3

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND

GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY


3-1

SECTION 3: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND SOIL INVESTIGATION

3.1 Topographic Survey

3.1.1 General

Topographic Survey was conducted at the designated areas of Nadzab Airport to prepare topographical maps and drawings showing the existing ground details and location of existing structures above the ground features as required carrying out the preliminary design for the Project.

This work consisted of the following works:

Baseline and Benchmarks surveys to establish the basic control points for the survey area

Topographical survey of the designated areas

3.1.2 Scope of Survey

The survey and mapping was to be conducted in the planned areas;

existing runway and runway extension area (24.4ha)

existing taxiways area (15.7ha)

existing apron and apron extension area (9.2ha)

new passenger terminal building area (4.4ha)

circulation road and carpark area (2.4ha)

access road area (3.4ha)

The survey and mapping areas are as shown in attached map.

Figure 3.1-1 Survey Area


3-2

3.1.3 Methodology

1) Baseline and Benchmark Survey

This work established horizontal and vertical control points within each airport area, using the existing reference control points (Local Airport Coordinate) already established and utilized with the airport. These control points served as reference for all detailed surveys works to follow.

a) Control Points

Setting up of control points was carried out using Total Station method and GPS method.

The control points were established by triangulation and/or closed traverse survey. The metric system was used in measurement. The length and angle of each traverse were measured twice and the averages of the two readings were regarded as corrected the length and angle of the traverse line. And error of closure & ratio of closure were provided for each the length and angle to adjust each value.

The loop formed in the closed traverse was geometrically and algebraically closed. Deflection angles, interior angles and azimuths were measured twice and the average of two (2) measurements were adopted.

The horizontal and elevation difference of the measurements were not greater than the value computed by the following formula:

D = 25 x N ^1/2 x ΣS

where: D = allowance horizontal difference ( mm )

N = Number of side

S = Total length of traverse in kilometers

D = 150 xΣS / N ^1/2

where: D = allowance elevation difference ( mm )

N = Number of side

S = Total length of traverse in kilometers


3-3

b) Levels

The elevations of the control points were determined with reference to two (2) existing benchmarks in the airport.

The leveling started from one of the national benchmarks to the other benchmark, and returned to the first one via a different route to form a closed loop.

The maximum allowable error in level was not greater than the value computed by the following formula:

E = 10 x S^1/2

where : E = allowable error ( mm )

S = one way length of traverse leveling in kilometers

2) Topographical Survey

Topographical survey was carried out using Total Station method. The survey recorded all natural and manmade features including existing marking such as centerline, edge line etc. of runway, taxiway and apron in the area to prepare topographical map

Control line was established parallel to the existing airport imaginary grid i.e. generally along the extended runway centerline. Sub stations were marked along the control line by stakes/pegs. The coordinates of each substation points were related to the primary control points previously established

3) Mapping and Drawings

a) Skeleton Maps

The skeleton map was drawn based on baseline survey including the followings:

Traverse network diagrams

Elevations and coordinates of the primary control points in airport local coordinate system and national grid coordinate system.

b) Topography Maps

All existing ground features manmade structures and utilities were clearly shown in the maps.


3-4

3.1.4 Subcontractor

1) Subcontractor

The contract agreement between JICA team and POLUME SURVEYORS Ltd was made on 19th day of May 2014. Selection of the subcontractor was conducted by the nomination tender. In the company that submitted the quotation, the one showed the lowest price had the right to enter into our contract after examination of the submitted documents.

2) Survey Instruments

Following survey instruments were used for the work;

1 x Wild TC 1010 Total Station (EDM)

1 x Topcon Total Station (EDM)

1 x Topcon (GPS) Hyper Ga

3) Work Schedule

Following work schedule was required for the work;

5days for Preparation (22nd May – 27th May)

30days for Field Work (28th May – 26th June)

25days for drawings and reporting(27th June – 21st July)

3.1.5 Result of Survey

1) Reference Points and Bench Marks

Reference points and bench marks are to refer to the existing survey result. Information of reference points and bench marks are shown in Table3.1-1 and Table3.1-2


3-5

Table3.1-1 Location of Reference Points

Table3.1-2 Location of Bench Marks

Photo Photo

Location Location

Coordinate Coordinate EAST: EAST:NORTH: NORTH:ELEVATION: ELEVATION:

469774.3229274354.692

76.305

47025.3609274063.368

72.353

DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE POINT

GPS NZB PSM PSM 5831

Inside National Weather ServiceInstrument Station Fence

About 50m south of Access Road and nearthe existing apron fence.

Photo Photo

Location Location

Elevation Elevation72.910 64.756

DESCRIPTION OF BENCH MARK

PSM 5810 PSM 31481

Centerline of Runway Western EndCenterline of Runway Eastern End


3-6

2) Topographic Map

Figure 3.1-2 Topographic Map


3-7

3.2 Soil Investigation

3.2.1 General

Soil Investigation was carried out to obtain sub-surface data, provide test results and information necessary for execution of preliminary design for the Project. The Works was conducted by Subcontractor under supervision of the Consultants.

Korea International Cooperation Agency (hereinafter KOICA) had conducted similar tests as Geotechnical Investigations in 1993. After careful verification, the tests data was considered to apply to our study in terms of technical specification.

According to the KOICA’s report, detailed soil data of (i) existing runway, (ii) runway extension

area and (iii) existing taxiways were covered. Therefore the original scope was revised, and the tests were conducted only terminal area in our study.

3.2.2 Scope of Investigation

The work items conducted are shown in below.

Table3.2-1 Content of Soil Investigation

Items Description

1 Boring Test

1.1 Mechanical Boring

Terminal extension area:2 boreholes

Control center and Fire Station area: 1 borehole

30m in total length

1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Every 1m interval (30 times)

1.3 Undisturbed cohesive soil sampling Not conducted.

(Cohesive layer enable to take undisturbed samples did not exist)

1.4 Laboratory test

1.4.1 Specific Gravity

15 samples taken from SPT samples

1.4.2 Particle Size Analysis Test

1.4.3 Moisture Density Test

1.4.4 Particle Size Analysis Test

1.4.5 Liquid Limit and Plasticity Limit Test

1.4.6 Unit Weight Test These items were not conducted because


3-8

1.4.7 Unconfined Compressive Strength Test cohesive layer did not exist.

1.4.8 Consolidation Test

1) Boring Location

Location of each of the boring tests is shown in Fig3.2-2. The coordinates and levels referenced to Nadzab airport survey system were provided for each boring location.

Table3.2-2 Coordinates and Elevation of boreholes

No of Bore Holes

Coordinate Elevation

T-1 470,042.71 E 9,274,042.10 N 72.65m

T-2 470,153.66 E 9,274,114.98 N 71.46m

CF-1 469,526.49 E 9,274,114.84 N 74.74m

Figure 3.2-1 Boring Location

2) Drilling core

The depth of the core drilling was about 10 meters at the specified point. After core drilling was completed, each drilling hole was filled up completely with bentonite slurry.


3-9

The drilling results described the following items;

Location of Boring Points

Geological (Soil) Section Drawing

Geological Column

Ground water level (Depth in drill hole)

Ultimate depth of drill hole

Photographs of core samples

3) Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

At each drill hole, Standard Penetration Test was conducted at every 1 m interval. Disturbed samples were sealed in transparent and airtight containers or plastic bags and kept in the core box for use of laboratory tests.

Samples for laboratory test were taken every two (2) meter at the each bore hole.

4) Undisturbed Soil Sampling

Cohesive soils were not encountered in the study. Therefore undisturbed samples were not taken.

3.2.3 Methodology

Boring and Laboratory testing on physical and mechanical properties of the soil samples have been carried out according with AS standard as alternative of ASTM that is mentioned in TOR.

Table 3.2-3 Applied Standards for Boring Tests

Items Standard

Mechanical Boring AS 1289.1.1 (ASTM D1452-80)

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) AS 1289.1.3.1 (ASTM D1586-84)


3-10

Table 3.2-4 Applied Standards for Laboratory Tests Physical tests

Items ASTM AS

Particle Size Analysis D422-63 1289.3.6.1

Moisture Density D2216-10 1289.2.1.1

Specific Gravity D854-10 1289.3.5.2 Liquid Limit and Plasticity Limit D4318-10 1289.3.1.2

3.2.4 Subcontractor

1) Subcontractor

The contract agreement between JICA team and ACEM GEOTECHNIQUES LTD. was made on 27th day of June 2014.

2) Investigation Machinery

Following machinery was used for the work;

1 x GEMCO 210D Drill Rig

1 x Isuzu Tipper Truck – Water Cart & Tank

3) Work Schedule

Following work schedule was required for the work;

10days for Mobilization and Shipping (27th May – 6th Jul)

20days for Field Work and Laboratory Test (7th Jul – 26th Jul)

20days for reporting(27th July – 15th Aug)

3.2.5 KOICA Report

According to KOICA report, (1) Boring Test, (2) Trial Pits and (3) Hand Pits were carried out. Location of each items are shown in the attached map.

This data is applicable to preliminary design in this study. Therefor soil information of (a) Runway and Runway extension area, (b) Taxiway area, and (c) Apron area were applied to this report.


3-11

Table3.2-5 Quantities of the work by KOICA

Items Description

1 Boring Test Runway and Runway extension area:4 boreholes

Apron area: 1 borehole

2 Trial Pits

Runway and Runway extension area:8 Pits

Taxiway and Taxiway extension area: 6 Pits

Apron area: 1 Pit

3 Hand Pits Runway and Runway extension area:4 Pits

4 CBR Test Runway extension area:7 Points

5 Laboratory Test

Soil samples were taken from trial pit and hand pit

Soil Classification, In-situ Moisture, Particle size distribution, Consistency and Compaction were measured.

Figure 3.2-2 Location of the tests by KOICA report

3.2.6 Results of Soil Investigation

1) Geological information

The site geology has been described in the explanatory notes of the Markham 1:250,000 geological sheet (Fig3.2-3), published by the Australian Department of Mines and Energy and PNG Department of Lands, Surveys and Mines. The airport and surrounding areas encompass alluvial deposits of conglomerate, gravel, sand, silt: piedmont-slope deposits and alluvial fans. According to the map, this

●：Borehole

●：Trial Pit

●：Hand Pit


3-12

area is considered as ‘’Ramu Markham Fault Zone’’.

Figure 3.2-3 Geological Map of the Investigation Area


3-13

2) Boring Test result

Ground conditions are illustrated in Table 3.2-6, which has been drawn up from the borehole Geotechnical log sheets. And a cross sectional profile of the investigation area is shown in Fig3.2-3. Cobble beds appear as main layers until 10m below the surface accompanying thin sandy bed between them. Surface is covered with silty sand.

Table 3.2-6 Subsoil Configurations

Subsoil Type of Soil Thickness of Layer(m)

N value

Topsoil Silty Sand 1.5 -

Cobble Bed 1 Cobble 1.5～5.5 46～50 or above

Sand Gravel Sand 3.0～6.5 16～18

Cobble Bed2 Cobble 6.0～10.0 38～50 or above

Preparatory Survey on the Project for Nadzab (Lae) A

irport Rehabilitation JIC

A

Independent State of Papua New

Guinea N

AC

3-14

Figure 3.2-4 A

Cross-Sectional Profile

A A’

A

A’

Topsoil

Cobble bed 1

Sand

Cobble bed 2


3-15

3) Ground water level

No ground water was encountered to the maximum depths of the investigations. According to KOICA report, the water table has been obtained by examining the water levels in the boreholes which provide potable water within the airport. These boreholes were terminated around 30 m to 40 m from the ground surface.

4) Laboratory Test Result

Summary of the laboratory test are shown in Fig3.2-7. The Cobble beds are a mixture of sand, gravel and cobbles and are generally well graded.


3-16

Table 3.2-7 Summary of laboratory test

BH No.

Soil Type

Depth (m)

Soil Classification

% Fines

% Sand

% Gravel

Moisture Content

%

Liquid Limit

%

Plasticity Index %

Linear Shrinkage

%

CF-1 Black Sand

1.5 SC 67 30 3 5.4 43 16 7.0

CF-1 Cobble

Bed 3.0 Cobbles 2 26 72 17.7 38 15 6.5

CF-1 Cobble

Bed 4.5 Cobbles 3 18 79 13.2 27 11 5.5

CF-1 Sands 6.0 SC/SW 20 44 36 15.9 41 12 6

CF-1 Cobble

Bed 7.5 Cobbles 4 27 69 10.5 36 10 5.0

T-1 Cobble

Bed 1.5 Cobbles 9 34 57 6.9 39 10 5.5

T-1 Sands 3.0 GW 3 27 70 23.6 43 16 7.0

T-1 Sands 4.5 GW 8 41 51 23.6 45 18 6.5

T-1 Cobble

Bed 6.0 Cobbles 3 21 76 13.5 39 12 5.0

T-1 Cobble

Bed 7.5 Cobbles 6 33 61 12.3 33 8 4.5

T-2 Cobble

Bed 1.5 Cobbles 3 36 61 18.0 36 18 6.0

T-2 Sands 4.5 GW 3 32 65 16.8 34 8 4.0

T-2 Sands 9.0 GW 8 26 76 11.9 28 6 3.5

T-2 Sands 10.5 CL 79 20 1 24.6 33 5 2.5

T-2 Sands 12.0 SC 67 32 1 24.6 31 7 2.5


3-17

3.2.7 Consideration

1) Designed soil parameter

Soil parameters of each layer are determined and shown in Table3.2-8.

Table 3.2-8 Soil Parameter

Subsoil Designed N value

Unit Weight γt(kN/m3)

Cohesion c(kN/m2)

Angle of Internal Friction

φ(°)

Topsoil （7）（18）（42） (0)

Cobble Bed 1 50 20 0 40

Sand 14 18 0 31

Cobble Bed2 50 20 0 40

※Topsoil is indicated as a reference due to data shortage.

2) Foundation Structure

There are several foundation types for planned terminal building applicable for the study area. The characteristics and engineering consideration of those foundations are shown as follows:

a) Raft Foundation This method is the easiest to execute, and the most economically friendly. However, the

allowable bearing capacity may be insufficient since the thickness is less than 2 -3 meter at T-1 &T-1. If structural load of the new planned terminal is not so heavy, this method would be applicable.

Figure 3.2-5 Bearing Layer Line of Raft Foundation

Bearing Layer

Line


3-18

b) Raft Foundation with Soil Improvement This method is to improve sand layer around T-1&T-2, in order to increase its stability of the

bearing layer. Cement Deep Mixing (CDM) is one of the methods to be applied for soil improvement. This prescribes strength by mixing cement slurry with the soft soil on site. The machines used for CDM are below.

Table 3.2-9 Applicable machines for CDM

Referred by Cement Deep Mixing Association

Figure 3.2-6 Bearing Layer Line of Raft Foundation with Soil Improvement

Bearing layer

Line

Soil

Improvement


3-19

c) Piled Foundation This method is to form pile foundation on the “cobble bed 2” as its support. As the layer is thicker

than the “cobble bed 1”, stronger bearing capacity is expected. However, the cost is the highest among the methods.

Figure 3.2-7 Bearing Layer Line of Pile Foundation

3) Gradient of Excavation slope As the excavation area for foundation work is not vicinity of the existing structures, open cut

method is applicable. According Industrial Safety and Health Law in Japan, height of excavation and

its gradient were provided. In our study, gradient of the excavation slope is required to be 35°or less to keep the slope safe during construction work.

Table 3.2-10 Height of excavation and its gradient as applied to the open cut method

Type of ground Height of excavation Slope of excavation Remarks

Bedrock or rigid clay Less than 5m 90 degree or less

5m or more 75 degree or less

Other ground Less than 2m 90 degree or less

2m or more, less than 5m 75 degree or less

5m or more 60 degree or less

Sand ground Less than 5m or 35 degree or less

Brittle ground Less than 2m or 45 degree or less

Bearing layer

Line

Height

Gradient

SECTION 4

AIR TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST


4-1

SECTION 4: AIR TRAFFIC DEMAND FORECAST

4.1 General

The subject of this section is to forecast the growth of air traffic demand and the access traffic related to the air traffic. The results of the demand forecast contribute to the planning of airport facilities such as runway, taxiway, and aircraft parking stand, passenger terminal building, cargo terminal building, car park and so forth.

The forecast study includes the demands listed below: i) Annual domestic passengers; ii) Domestic peak demand (daily / hourly); iii) Domestic aircraft movements; iv) International passengers and aircraft movements; v) Annual air cargo; and vi) Airport access traffic.


4-2

4.2 Methodology for Demand Forecast

The relation and study flow of six demands is shown in Figure 4.2-1.

Figure 4.2-1 Study Flow of Demand Forecast Items

i) Annual domestic passengers which are an important demand as the basis of all other demands have been forecast by the regression models based on the correlation between the historical data of air traffic and socio-economic indices.

ii) Domestic peak demand has been forecast based on the past monthly records and peak hour characteristics at Nadzab/Lae Airport.

iii) Annual air cargo has been forecast based on the past relation between the air passengers carried and the cargo volume.

iv) Since Nadzab/Lae Airport does not have enough data for actual international passengers, site survey such as interview with passengers has been conducted in order to collect data about passenger movements from Nadzab/Lae to international destinations. Firstly, daily international passenger traffic during a week is to be estimated based on the result of site survey, then days with adequate number of international passengers are identified and daily aircraft movements estimated. Then the weekly passenger and aircraft movements are converted to monthly and yearly movements. The peak hour movements are to be estimated based on the number of peak day passenger and aircraft movements.

v) Aircraft movement is forecast in accordance with design day passengers, future aircraft and appropriate seat factor.

vi) Airport access traffic is forecast based on the result of site survey carried out at Nadzab/Lae Airport.

AnnualDomestic passengers

International Passengersand Aircraft Movements

Domestic Peak Demand(Daily / Hourly)

AnnualAir Cargo

Aircraft Movementsfor Domestic Airport Access Traffic

PassengerInterview Survey


4-3

4.3 Projection of Socio-economic Indices

4.3.1 Socio-Economic Indices as Forecasting Parameters

Generally speaking, the air passenger demand proportionally grows or falls in line with increase/decrease of socio-economic indices such as GDP and population. With regard to GDP, the Government of Papua New Guinea (GPNG) and relevant international organizations publish actual and future prospective GDP attributable to mineral (or mining) and nonmineral (other than mining). In particular, ADB published GDP by industrial origin at 1998 market price from 1995 to 2012 (Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2013, ADB), and subsequent analysis has been carried out based on the said data. Historical trend of GDP (total and nonmineral), population and the passenger movements at Nadzab (Air Niugini: ANG and Airline PNG: APNG) is as shown in Table 4.3-1. Figure 4.3-1 shows relationships between the socio-economic indices and the domestic passenger movements record (Air Niugini; ANG and Airline PNG: APNG) at Nadzab Airport. Both of GDP with/without Mining, population and the domestic passengers at Nadzab have been increasing in the last 10 years.

Table 4.3-1 Socio-economic Indices and Nadzab Domestic Passenger Movement Record

Year Total GDP*1

(Million PGK) Nonmineral GDP*1

(Million PGK) Population (Million)

Nadzab Domestic Pax. (ANG+APNG, '1000)

2003 8,252.2 7,119.1 5.6 150

2004 8,299.3 7,187.0 5.8 154

2005 8,625.1 7,499.3 5.9 167

2006 8,822.9 7,792.5 6.1 169

2007 9,453.9 8,424.3 6.3 198

2008 10,079.1 9,064.2 6.4 221

2009 10,697.6 9,700.1 6.6 239

2010 11,507.3 10,529.3 6.8 264

2011 12,802.8 11,940.0 7.0 280

2012 13,976.4 13,108.2 7.3 296

AAGR*2 (%) 6.0% 7.0% 3.0% 7.8%

Note. *1 GDP in 1998 constant price, AAGR*2: Average Annual Growth Rate Data source: Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2013, ADB


4-4

Figure 4.3-1(a) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and Total GDP

Figure 4.3-1(b) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and Nonmineral GDP

Figure 4.3-1(c) Correlation between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and Population

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 5000 10000 15000

Na

dza

b D

om

est

ic P

assen

gers

('1

000)

Total GDP (Million PGK)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 5000 10000 15000

Na

dza

b D

om

est

ic P

assen

gers

('1

000)

Nonmineral GDP (Million PGK)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2 4 6 8Na

dza

b D

om

est

ic P

assen

gers

('1

000)

Population (Million)


4-5

Table 4.3-2 presents correlations between the passenger movements and Total/Nonmineral GDP as well as the population. As can also seen from Figure 4.3-1, the passengers and indices are all increasing, and correllation coeficients obtained seem to be quite high.

Table 4.3-2 Correllation Matrix between Nadzab Domestic Passengers and GDP/Population

Total GDP Nonmineral GDP Population

Nadzab Domestic Pax. ('1000) (ANG+APNG)

0.978 0.978 0.986

It is generally accepted that economic outputs represented by GDP could generate demand for people to travel. It is also understandable that a travel demand would be generated when the population, potential travelers, increases. However, travel cost by air in Papua New Guinea is quite expensive (APNG return flight between Port Moresby and Lae in September cost about PGK 620, equivalent to JPY 31,000 at PGK=JPY 50, which is slightly cheaper than the shuttle round trip fare of JAL: JPY 33,480 between Tokyo and Osaka) but the per capita GDP is still very low belonging to the lowest income country group of Pacific Islands as shown in Figure 4.3-2, and it is considered unlikely that past population increase directly contributed to the growth of passenger movements at Nadzab Airport.

Therefore, the Total GDP and Nonmineral GDP have been selected for further examination.

Figure 4.3-2 Comparison of GDP per Capita among Pacific Island Countries Data source: IMF Country Report No. 13/339 December 2013


4-6

4.3.2 Projection of Socio-economic Framework

For the sake of the demand forecast for domestic passengers, the future economic growth rates of PNG, the Total GDP and Nonmineral GDP are necessary to be established.

1) Total GDP

According to the GDP forecast by international organizations as well as the Government of Papua New Guinea (GPNG), future GDP is forecast as shown in Table 4.3-3. In any case GDP in 2015 is expected to significantly grow at around 20% because the construction of PNG LNG project is completed and its export becomes in full stream. In and after 2016, IMF foresees moderate GDP growth of around 3.5% while the Government of Papua New Guinea (GPNG) has slightly negative prospect of around 3% growth (Government of Papua New Guinea 2014 Budget Strategy Paper).

Table 4.3-3 Anticipated Future GDP Growth Rates by International Organizations and GPNG

Year Future GDP Annual Growth

IMF World Bank ADB GPNG 2014 Budget

2013 4.6 4.0 - 6.1

2014 6.0 8.5 6.0 6.0

2015 21.6 20.0 21.0 21.5

2016 3.3 5.0 - 3.1

2017 3.4 - - 3.3

2018 3.4 - - 1.9

2019 3.7 - - - Source:

IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2014 World Bank, Global Economic Prospects, January 2014 ADB, Asian Development Outlook 2014 GPNG 2014 Budget: Government of Papua New Guinea 2014 Budget Strategy Paper

For the purpose of estimating future airport traffic at Nadzab Airport, the future GDP (total) growth rates have been assumed as shown in Table 4.3-6. GDP growth rate in and after 2016 has been achieved to be 3.3% by averaging extended IMF estimate of 3.5% and the GPNG estimate of 3%.

Table 4.3-4 Assumed Future Total GDP Growth Rates

Year GDP Growth Rate References

2013 4.6% Projected in IMF World Economic Outlook 2014 2014 6.0%

2015 20.0% IMF/ADB (rounded)

2016 and after 3.3% Average of IMF and GPNG Estimates


4-7

Figure 4.3-3 Historical Trend of Actual and Assumed Total GDP

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

Tota

l G

DP

(M

illi

on

PG

K, 1

99

8 c

on

sta

nt

pri

ce)

Actual Total GDP Estimated Total GDP


4-8

2) Nonmineral GDP

IMF and GPNG published future estimate of nonmineral (non-mining) as shown in Table 4.3-7. Although the estimate for 2018 made by GPNG is lower than the estimate by IMF, both estimates are very much similar for the other years and averaged growth rates have been adopted from 2013 to 2018. For 2019 and thereafter, average of the adopted growth rates excluding the highest in 2013 and the lowest in 2014 has been computed as 4.2% and adopted.

Table 4.3-5 IMF/GPNG Estimates and Adopted Nonmineral GDP Growth Rates

Year IMF Estimate GPNG Estimate Adopted Growth Rates

(Average of IMF and GPNG) Mineral Nonmineral Nonmineral

2013 5.3% 5.4% 5.5% 5.5%

2014 80.7% 1.7% 1.3% 1.5%

2015 178.3% 4.2% 4.3% 4.3%

2016 -0.7% 4.5% 4.3% 4.4%

2017 -0.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%

2018 -0.6% 4.5% 2.4% 3.5%

2019 and after - - - 4.2%

Data source: IMF Estimates: IMF Country Report No. 13/339, December 2013

GPNG Estimate: 2014 Budget Strategy Paper

Figure 4.3-4 Historical Trend of Actual and Estimated Nonmineral GDP

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

200320052007200920112013201520172019202120232025202720292031

Non

min

era

l G

DP

(M

illi

on

PG

K, 1

99

8

con

stra

nt

pri

ce)

Nonmineral GDP (Actual) Nonmineral GDP (Estimate)


4-9

4.4 Annual Domestic Passenger Forecast

4.4.1 Study Flow

Study flow of demand forecast for annual domestic passenger is shown in Figure 4.4-1. Firstly, regression analysis has been carried out based on the historical data of air passengers provided by Air Niugini and Airlines PNG and historical GDP provided by IMF. Note that the historic traffic data of Air Niugini and Airline PNG only are available as Travel Air and North Coast Aviation are new comers. The future domestic passengers are forecast based on the model established by regression analysis and socio-economic framework.

Figure 4.4-1 Study Flow of Forecast for Domestic Passengers

4.4.2 Forecasting Models and Result

1) Regression Analyses

Regression analyses have been made in order to obtain forecasting models of the future domestic air passenger movements at Nadzab Airport. Typically there are three types of models commonly used for air passenger demand forecast; linear type, logarithm type and exponential type. Result of the regression analyses is as shown in Table 4.4-1and Figure 4.4-2 (Total GDP) as well as Table 4.4-2 and Figure 4.4-3 (Nonmineral GDP).

Table 4.4-1 Forecasting Models Tested for Nadzab Airport Case (Total GDP)

Parameter Linear Type Logarithm Type Exponential Type

Basic Y=A*X+B Y=A*Ln(X)+B Y=XA * eB

Y Domestic passenger movements at Nadzab Airport (ANG & APNG)

X Total GDP (Million PGK) in 1998 constant price

A 0.0275 295.32 1.371

B -67.532 -2508.4 -7.3017

Coefficient of Determination (R2) 0.9638 0.9845 0.9613

Trend of DomesticPassengers

Trend of GDP/ GDP per capita

Regression Anylisis

Future Domestic Passengers

Projection of Future GDP


4-10

Figure 4.4-2 Forecast ANG & APNG Passengers at Nadzab Airport (Total GDP)

Table 4.4-2 Forecasting Models Tested for Nadzab Airport Case (Nonmineral GDP)

Parameters Linear Type Logarithm Type Exponential Type

Basic Equation Y=A*X+B Y=A*Ln(X)+B Y=XA * eB

Y Domestic passenger movements at Nadzab Airport (ANG & APNG)

X Nonmineral GDP (Million PGK) in 1998 constant price

A 0.0268 289.64 1.343

B -60.525 -2456.5 -7.0485

Coefficient of Determination (R2) 0.9566 0.9805 0.9555

Figure 4.4-3 Forecast ANG & APNG Passengers at Nadzab Airport (Nonmineral GDP)

545

653

780

448 496

544

296

617

770

962

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

An

nu

al

Dom

est

ic P

ass

en

gers

(th

ou

san

d)

Actual

Linear

Log

Exponential

441

555

696

393

452

512

296

474

625

824

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

An

nu

al

Dom

est

ic P

ass

en

gers

(th

ou

san

d)

Actual

Linear

Log

Exponential


4-11

2) Conversion to Total Nadzab Airport Domestic Passenger Movements

The demand indicated in Figures 4.4-2 and 4.4-3 is based on the historical traffic data of ANG and APNG only, and the passengers of Travel Air and North Coast Aviation should be added. The share of each airline at Nadzab/Lae Airport is shown in Table 4.4-3. The total domestic passenger including Travel Air and North Coast Aviation is calculated by multiplying ANG+APNG demand by 1.1 as shown in Table 4.4-4.

Table 4.4-3 Share of Each Airline at Nadzab Airport

Year Description Air Niugini Airline PNG

Travel Air North Coast

Aviation Total

2012 Passengers (‘1000) 222 74 25 7 328

Share 68% 22% 8% 2% 100%

Table 4.4-4 Comparison of Nadzab Airport Domestic Passengers Forecast Results

Description Total GDP Nonmineral GDP

Linear Logarithm Exponent Linear Logarithm Exponent

Actual

(‘1000)

2003 (ANG & APNG) 150

2012 (ANG &APNG) 296

AAGR (’03-’12) 7.8%

2012 (Total) 328

Forecast

(Total)

2021 (‘1000) 600 493 679 485 432 521

AAGR (’12-’21) 6.9% 4.6% 8.4% 4.4% 3.1% 5.3%

2026 (‘1000) 718 546 847 611 497 688

AAGR (’21-’26) 3.7% 2.1% 4.5% 4.7% 2.8% 5.7%

2031 (‘1000) 858 598 1,058 766 563 906

AAGR (’26-’31) 3.6% 1.8% 4.5% 4.6% 2.5% 5.7%

AAGR (’12-’31) 5.2% 3.2% 6.4% 4.6% 2.9% 5.5%

Note. AAGR: Average Annual Growth Rate (%)

3) Forecast in National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

According to the National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030 (NDSP 2010-2030) formulated by the Government of Papua New Guinea, the domestic air passenger demand in Momase Region has been forecast to reach approximately 2 million in 2030. As the movements at Nadzab Airport accounts for about 53% of Momase Region, NDSP 2010-2030 envisaged that the domestic air passenger movements at Nadzab Airport would increase to approximately 1 million in 2030. The average annual growth rate from 2012 to 2030 in this case is approximately 6.4%.


4-12

Figure 4.4-4 Domestic Air Passenger Forecast in National Development Strategy Plan 2010-2030

4) Choice of Forecasting Model Type

The exponential type model represents elasticity of traffic against explanatory parameter. For example, value of A of the exponential type model (Total GDP) was 1.371, meaning the traffic would increase at 1.371 times faster than the growth rate of the Total GDP (average annual growth rates from 2021-2026 and 2026-2031 obtained were both 4.5%, about 1.371 times the assumed Total GDP growth rate of 3.3%). In case the elasticity (value of A) is more than 1, the traffic trend is exponentially upward and could result in overestimate.

On the other hand, the logarithm type model reflects downward trend of a traffic as is the case of the forecast result of logarithm type (Total GDP), average annual growth rates of the traffic decreasing from 7.8% (2003-2012) to 4.6% (2012-2021), 2.1% (2021-2026) and 1.8% (2026 to 2031). In Papua New Guinea, as the income level of the people is expected to improve progressively in future, more patronage of the air travel can be expected and the downward trend represented by the logarithm model is considered not suitable for forecast of the Nadzab Airport domestic passenger movements. Even though this type of model achieved the highest value of the coefficient of determination (0.98), the differences between the other two model types are about 0.02 and it can be concluded that such small difference should not be a basis to choose the forecasting model which produces a forecasting result not coincide with the anticipated future.

The linear type model reflects certain volume of growth of the traffic in proportion to the increase of an explanatory parameter (value A). In terms of the change against previous year, the traffic growth rates become slightly smaller relative to the growth rates of the explanatory parameter as the traffic volume gets bigger. The coefficient of determination of the linear type models was around 0.96 (Total GDP and Nonmineral GDP), slightly lower than the logarithm type (around 0.98) but still high enough, showing high degree of interpretation. The linear type model produces the moderate result of forecast.


4-13

For the purpose of formulating Nadzab Airport Master Development/Rehabilitation Plan, a risk of overestimating and underestimating the future demand should be avoided as much as possible and from that viewpoint the linear type forecasting model is considered the most suitable and should be adopted.

5) Choice of Total GDP or Nonmineral GDP

The GDP statistics are available for each of the industrial sectors; agriculture, mining, manufacturing, electricity/gas/water, construction, trade, transportation/communication, finance and public administration. The mining sector includes traditional gold, silver, copper nickel and oil mining in addition to the newly developed LNG. It is impracticable to exclude the LNG component only from the GDP statistics.

The Survey Team considers choice of the Total GDP is more preferable than the Nonmineral GDP because of the following:

There are several existing and applied mining sites operated by Morobe Mining Joint Venture (MMJV) in Morobe Province, exploring gold, silver, copper, molybdenum, etc. MMJV is a joint venture organized by South African and Australian companies. The activities of MMJV should be regarded as one of the air traffic demand generators for Nadzab Airport. In case Nonmineral GDP is used as the forecasting parameter, the activities of MMJV would be disregarded.

PNG LNG project site is far from Morobe Province and the City of Lae, and its direct impact on Nadzab Airport traffic demand generation is unlikely, however dividend and tax payments attributable to the PNG LNG project is expected to peak in the early 2020s (ADB statement) and the increase of real income for Papua New Guinea could function as a driving force to generate air travel demand within the planning horizon of the Nadzab Airport Project.

6) Conclusion

In conclusion, the domestic passenger demand forecast at Nadzab Airport has been carried out based on the linear type forecasting model and the Total GDP was employed as the explanatory parameter. Result is summarized in Table 4.4-5.

Table 4.4-5 Summary of Forecasting Model, Parameter and Result

Type of Equation Linear Type

Basic Y=A*X+B

Y Domestic passenger movements (ANG & APNG)

X Total GDP (Million PGK) in 1998 constant price

A 0.0275

B -67.532

Coefficient of Determination (R2) 0.9638


4-14

Type of Equation Linear Type

Domestic Passenger Movements (‘1000)

2012 (Actual) 328 (AAGR ’03-’12: 7.8%)

2021 (Opening Day) 600 (AAGR ’12-’21: 6.9%)

2026 (5 years after Opening Day) 718 (AAGR ’21-’26: 3.7%)

2031 (10 years after Opening Day) 858 (AAGR ’26-’31: 3.6%)

The domestic passenger movements shown in Table 4.4-5 include international passengers who board a Nadzab-Port Moresby flight and transfer to/from international flight at Port Moresby Airport. These passengers who are essentially international passengers are forecasted and the scheduled international flights to/from Nadzab Airport are estimated in Section 4.7. As these international passengers are converted from domestic passenger of Nadzab-Port Moresby flight to international direct flight, the international passenger movements should be subtracted from passenger movements shown in Table 4.4-5. However, the number of conversion passengers are minimal, therefore, the reduction has not been considered.


4-15

4.5 Domestic Peak Demand Forecast

4.5.1 Study Flow

Based on the annual demand forecast, peak demand such as daily and hourly demand has been analyzed by following study flow as shown in Figure 4.5-1. Peak demand is a basis for the study of facility requirement. In order to calculate the peak demand, design day ratio and peak hour ratio should be established.

Figure 4.5-1 Study Flow of Peak Demand

4.5.2 Design Day and Peak Hour Ratio

1) Design Day Ratio Design day ratio is set as the ratio of “passengers of average day of peak month” to annual passengers. Average ratio in the last three years is 1/326. 2) Peak Hour Ratio Peak hour ratio is set based on the flight schedule as of May 2014 at Nadzab/Lae Airport which is shown in Figure 4.5-2. The total number of flight of the day was 54, and the number of flight at peak hour during 9-10 am was seven. The peak hour ratio at Nadzab/Lae Airport has been set as follows:

Peak Hour Ratio = 7 / 54 =0.130

Figure 4.5-2 Number of Flights by Time

Annual Passengers

Design Day Ratio

Design DayPassengers

Peak Hour Ratio

Design HourPassengers

Actual Average2010 1/3282011 1/3062012 1/345

1/326

Table 4.5-1 Design Day Ratio


4-16

4.5.3 Peak Demand

Based on the annual passengers and the peak ratios, design day and peak hour passengers are calculated as shown in Table 4.5-2.

Table 4.5-2 Peak Demand

Year Annual Domestic

Passengers Peak-day Domestic

Passengers Peak-hour Domestic

Passengers (Two-way)

2021 600,000 1,840 240

2026 718,000 2,200 290

2031 858,000 2,630 340


4-17

4.6 Domestic Aircraft Movements Forecast

4.6.1 Study Flow

Aircraft movements are estimated based on the annual passengers and airline’s future fleet plan. Design day aircraft movements are calculated based on the design day passengers by airline and by route as shown in Figure 4.6-1.

Figure 4.6-1 Study Flow of Aircraft Demand

4.6.2 Planning Factors

The planning factors which are required for calculation of the design day aircraft movements are set as follows: 1) Airline Share Airline share in terms of the number of passengers is shown in Table 4.6-1. The passengers by airline are shown in Table 4.6-2.

Table 4.6-2 Estimated Domestic Passengers by Airline

Year Annual Passengers (‘1000)

ANG (68%) APNG (22%) TA (8%) NCA (2%) Total (100%)

2021 408 132 48 12 600

2026 489 158 57 14 718

2031 583 189 69 17 858

Annual PassengersAnnual Passengersby Airline/Route

Airline Share Design Day Ratio

Design Day Passengersby Airline/Route

Planned Load Factor Aircraft Seat Capacity

Design DayAircraft Movements

Route Share

AnnualAircraft Movements

Table 4.6-1 Airline Share

ANG APNG TA NCA68% 22% 8% 2%

Note: Based on 2012 data


4-18

2) Route Share Route share in terms of the number of passengers is shown in Table 4.6-3.

Table 4.6-3 Route Share

3) Future Aircraft and Load Factor According to the comment of Air Niugini, gradual introduction of a larger type of aircraft such as B737 will be considered when daily flight frequency of F100 exceeds 5 or 6. Besides, Air Niugini will replace Dash 8-Q400 with Fokker F70 or another 70-seater aircraft and Airlines PNG will replace Dash8-100 with ATR72 in the near future.

As for the load factor, current load factors for Port Moresby-Nadzab is approx. 80% and the others approx. 30% according to Air Niugini. The load factors in future have been assumed to be 70% for the flight to/from Port Moresby and 60% for the other flights.

4.6.3 Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements

Based on the future demand and future aircraft, aircraft movements on design day are calculated as shown in Table 4.6-5 and Table 4.6-6.

Table 4.6-5 Summary Forecasts of Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements

Aircraft 2021 2026 2031

B737-800 4 6 10

70-seater/ATR72 32 34 34

F50 6 6 6

BN 6 8 10

Total 48 54 60

Note. Detail calculation is shown in Table 4.6-6

Airline Route Share Airline Route ShareANG POM 90% TA POM 40%

HKN 10% MAGAPNG POM 75% Others

RAB NCA 100% HKNGKAMAGOthers

25%

60%

Airline Aircraft Seats L/F

ANG

B737-800 158 70%

70-seater 75 Port Moresby 70%

Others 60%

APNG ATR72 72 60%

TA F50 58 60%

NCA BN 9 60%

Note: Based on data of 2010-2012

Table 4.6-4 Future Aircraft and Load Factor


4-19

Table 4.6-6 Calculation of Daily Domestic Aircraft Movements

Airline PAX Route Share PAX Aircraft S/C MovementsANG 408 POM 40% 163 B737-800 158 4

POM 50% 204 70-seater 75 12HKN 10% 41 70-seater 75 2

APNG 132 POM 75% 99 ATR72 72 8RAB 2HKN 2GKA 2MAG 2Others 2

TA 48 POM 40% 19 F50 58 2MAG 2Others 2

NCA 12 12 BN 9 6Total 600 B737-800 4

70-seater 14ATR72 18F50 6BN 6Total 48

Airline PAX Route Share PAX Aircraft S/C MovementsANG 489 POM 50% 245 B737-800 158 668% POM 40% 196 70-seater 75 12

HKN 10% 48 70-seater 75 4APNG 158 POM 75% 119 ATR72 72 822% RAB 2

HKN 2GKA 2MAG 2Others 2

TA 57 POM 40% 23 F50 58 28% MAG 2

Others 2NCA 14 14 BN 9 8Total 718 B737-800 6


Airline PAX Route Share PAX Aircraft S/C MovementsANG 583 POM 60% 350 B737-800 158 1068% POM 30% 175 70-seater 75 10

HKN 10% 58 70-seater 75 4APNG 189 POM 75% 142 ATR72 72 1022% RAB 2

HKN 2GKA 2MAG 2Others 2

TA 69 POM 40% 28 F50 58 28% MAG 2

Others 2NCA 17 17 BN 9 10Total 858 B737-800 10


29 F50 58

25% 33 ATR72 72

2026

25% 39 ATR72 72

60% 34

2021

60%

58

F50 58

2031

25% 47 ATR72 72

60% 41 F50


4-20

4.6.4 Peak-hour Domestic Aircraft Movements

Table 4.6-7 shows forecast domestic aircraft movement at Nadzab/Lae Airport.

Table 4.6-7 Forecast Peak-hour Domestic Aircraft Movements

Aircraft Type 2021 2026 2031

B767/B777/B787 Occasional diverted flights only.

B737 0.52 0.78 1.30

70-seater, ATR 72 4.16 4.42 4.42

F50 0.78 0.78 0.78

BN 0.78 1.04 1.30

Total 6.24 7.02 7.80


4-21

4.7 International Passenger Demand Forecast

4.7.1 Current Situation of International Passengers Originated from Lae

JICA Survey Team collected two different data with respect to the international passengers who departed Lae and transferred to any international flights at Port Moresby as follows: i) The record of domestic passengers who departed Nadzab by Air Niugini flights and transferred to

the international at Port Moresby provided by Air Niugini; and ii) Result of the international passenger interview survey conducted at Port Moresby.

According to the analysis of these data, the destinations of the passengers whose trips were originated from Lae Airport and transferred to the international flight at Port Moresby Airport is shown in Figure 4.7-1. Brisbane accounted for the largest share of around 40%, followed by Cairns.

Figure 4.7-1 International Destination of Passenger Originated from Lae Figure 4.7-2 shows daily shares of international passengers departing to Brisbane/Cairns in a week.

Figure 4.7-2 Fluctuation of Potential International Passenger Originated from Lae

Source: JICA Survey Team Source: JICA Survey Team

Destinations of passengers who departed Nadzab by Air Niugini

Destinations of International Passengers interviewed at Port Moresby Airport

Data provided by Air Niugini Result of interview survey at Port Moresby


4-22

4.7.2 Number of International Passengers

1) Estimate of International Departing Passengers

Based on the data at Nadzab provided by Air Niugini as well as Port Moresby interview survey, number of international departing passengers has been estimated as described below.

a) Case 1: Daily Passengers based on the data collected at Nadzab/Lae (Data of Air Niugini)

The daily international passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport are estimated based on the number of passengers who enplaned the Air Niugini flights from Lae to Port Moresby (Case 1). Air Niugini accounted for 68% of the total passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport, and the Air Niugini passengers between Lae and Port Moresby accounted for 90% of Air Niugini passengers to/from Nadzab/Lae Airport. Finally, daily international passengers for Brisbane/Cairns are calculated as shown in Table 4.7-1 by using the share of international passengers of each day.

Table 4.7-1 Estimate of Potential Daily Int’l Passengers (Case 1: Data provided by Air Niugini)

AnnualDomestic

Passengers

AnnualANG Portion

AnnualPOM-LAE

(thosand) (thosand) (thosand)

①②＝

①×68%③＝

②×90% ④ ⑤⑥＝

③/365×④/2⑦＝

③/365×⑤/22021 600 408 367 10 52026 718 488 439 12 62031 858 583 525 14 72021 600 408 367 15 02026 718 488 439 18 02031 858 583 525 22 02021 600 408 367 20 02026 718 488 439 24 02031 858 583 525 29 02021 600 408 367 25 152026 718 488 439 30 182031 858 583 525 36 222021 600 408 367 80 402026 718 488 439 96 482031 858 583 525 115 582021 600 408 367 25 602026 718 488 439 30 722031 858 583 525 36 862021 600 408 367 30 202026 718 488 439 36 242031 858 583 525 43 29

16%

5%

6%

1%

0%

0%

3%

8%

12%

4%

DailyInternationalDeparture

Passengersfor Cairns

2%

3%

4%

5%

Share ofDeparture

Passengersfor Brisbane



Share ofDeparture


Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Sun

Figure 4.7-3 Study Flow of International Passengers (1)

②　Share ofLAE-POM route

Domestic Passengers at Lae Airport

①

Share of ANG

ANG APNG TA

DailyInternational Passengers

to/from Lae

③　Share ofInt'l Passengers(originated Lae)

by route and day

POM HKN-RAB MAS


4-23

b) Case 2: Daily Passengers based on the interview survey at Port Moresby

For the calculation of the daily international passengers at Nadzab/Lae Airport based on the result of interview survey at Port Moresby Airport (Case 2), the annual international passengers at Port Moresby Airport is the basis of calculation as shown in Figure 4.7-4. Future international passengers at Port Moresby Airport are forecast as shown in Figure 4.7-5. The daily international passengers for Brisbane/Cairns from Lae are calculated as shown in Table 4.7-2 by using the share of international passengers of each day shown in Figure 4.7-2.

Figure 4.7-4 Study Flow of International Passengers (2)

Figure 4.7-5 Forecast of Annual International Passengers at POM

AnnualInternational Passengers

at POM

Average DayInternational Passengers

at POM

DailyInternational Passengers

at LAE

Share of Int'l Passengers(originated Lae)

by route and day


4-24

Table 4.7-2 Estimate of Potential Daily Int’l Passengers (Case 2: Interview Survey at Port Moresby)

c) Estimate of Realized Daily International Departing Passengers and Aircraft Movements

The daily international departure passengers for Brisbane and Cairns, to be regarded as the potential demand, are set as the average of Cases 1 and 2 indicated in Tables 4.7-1 and 4.7-2. A possibility to inaugurate a direct flight to Brisbane/Cairns from Nadzab/Lae has been assessed based on the criteria whether the aircraft load factor could be 60% or more as shown below. Load Factor = Daily Passengers / (Seat Capacity×Number of Flight) ≧ 60%

In the case that the potential daily departure passengers are more than the seat capacity of one departure and less than 60% of load factor of two departures, it is assumed that one departure might be operated and passengers who overflow the capacity of one departure should travel to Brisbane/Cairns via Port Moresby Airport. The international departure passengers and aircraft departure movements to be realized based on the above-stated criteria are shown in Tables 4.7-3 and 4.7-4.

AnnualInternational

Passengers at POM

(thosand)

① ②＝①/365 ③ ④ ⑤＝②×③/2 ⑥＝②×④/2

2021 816 2,236 11 02026 973 2,666 13 02031 1,158 3,173 16 02021 816 2,236 56 112026 973 2,666 67 132031 1,158 3,173 79 162021 816 2,236 67 222026 973 2,666 80 272031 1,158 3,173 95 322021 816 2,236 112 342026 973 2,666 133 402031 1,158 3,173 159 482021 816 2,236 157 452026 973 2,666 187 532031 1,158 3,173 222 632021 816 2,236 0 02026 973 2,666 0 02031 1,158 3,173 0 02021 816 2,236 45 222026 973 2,666 53 272031 1,158 3,173 63 32

4% 2%

10% 3%

14% 4%

0% 0%

1% 0%

5% 1%

6% 2%

Average DayInternational

Passengers at POM

Share ofDeparture


Share ofDeparture






Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Sat


4-25

Table 4.7-3 Daily International Departing Passengers and Aircraft Movements (Nadzab-Brisbane)

Table 4.7-4 Daily International Departing Passengers and Aircraft Movements (Nadzab-Cairns)

LAE POM Average2021 10 11 11 1 7%2026 12 13 13 1 8%2031 14 16 15 1 9%2021 15 56 36 1 23%2026 18 67 43 1 27%2031 22 79 51 1 32%2021 20 67 44 1 28%2026 24 80 52 1 33%2031 29 95 62 1 39%2021 25 112 69 1 44%2026 30 133 82 1 52%2031 36 159 98 1 62%2021 80 157 119 1 75%2026 96 187 142 1 90%2031 115 222 169 1 107%2021 25 0 13 1 8%2026 30 0 15 1 9%2031 36 0 18 1 11%2021 30 45 38 1 24%2026 36 53 45 1 28%2031 43 63 53 1 34%

Daily International Passengersfor Brisbane ('000)

Number of Daily Departure Flights

by B737 (158 seater)

LoadFactor

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Sun

LAE POM Average2021 5 0 3 1 4%2026 6 0 3 1 4%2031 7 0 4 1 5%2021 0 11 6 1 8%2026 0 13 7 1 9%2031 0 16 8 1 11%2021 0 22 11 1 15%2026 0 27 14 1 19%2031 0 32 16 1 21%2021 15 34 25 1 33%2026 18 40 29 1 39%2031 22 48 35 1 47%2021 40 45 43 1 57%2026 48 53 51 1 68%2031 58 63 61 1 81%2021 60 0 30 1 40%2026 72 0 36 1 48%2031 86 0 43 1 57%2021 20 22 21 1 28%2026 24 27 26 1 35%2031 29 32 31 1 41%

LoadFactor

Mon

Sun

Daily International Passengersfor Cairns ('000)

Number of Daily Flights

by F70 (75 seater)

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

Note: Yellow color indicates the operation of international departure flight (Load factor is more than 60%).

Note: Yellow color indicates the operation of international departure flight (Load factor is more than 60%).


4-26

The number of the departure flights in a week and annual international passengers are set as shown in Tables 4.7-5 and 4.7-6.

Table 4.7-5 Departure Flights in a Week

Year Route Aircraft Mon. Tue. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat. Sun. Total

2021 Brisbane B737 - - - - 1 - - 1

Cairns 70-seater - - - - - - - -

2026 Brisbane B737 - - - - 1 - - 1

Cairns 70-seater - - - - 1 - - 1

2031 Brisbane B737 - - - 1 1 - - 2

Cairns 70-seater - - - - 1 - - 1

2) Expected Flight Pattern

Considering the weekly distribution of the potential international passengers originated from Lae, most of them departing on Thursday/Friday/Saturday are likely to those visiting families in Australia. Although interview survey for the potential arriving passengers was not conducted, most of the passengers from Australia return to Nadzab on Monday and Tuesday according to an observation by NAC personnel. Therefore the flights between Nadzab and Brisbane/Cairns are likely to be operated connecting Port Moresby and Brisbane/Cairns via Nadzab. It has been assumed that the international flights between Nadzab and Brisbane/Cairns would be operated as follows:

On Thursday and Friday, departing Port Moresby and arriving Nadzab in the afternoon, departing Nadzab late afternoon and arriving Brisbane/Cairns in the evening. The aircraft is to be used for a nonstop flight from Brisbane/Cairns to Port Moresby on the following day.

On Monday or Tuesday, departing Brisbane/Cairns in the morning, arriving Nadzab at around noon time, departing Nadzab early afternoon and arriving Port Moresby late afternoon. The aircraft is to be used for a nonstop flight from Port Moresby to Brisbane/Cairns or other destinations.

It has also been assumed that the international passengers who would depart Nadzab to Brisbane/Cairns on the international flights would return to Nadzab directly from Brisbane/Cairns.

3) Estimated International Passenger Movements

Estimated international passenger movements are summarized in Table 4.7-6.


4-27

Table 4.7-6 Estimated Design Day/Annual International Passengers

Year Route Dep./Arr. Aircraft Weekly Passengers (Aircraft Movements) Annual

Passengers Mon. or Tue. Thurs. Fri. Total

2021

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - - 120 (1) 120 (1) 6,200

Arr. 120 (1) - - 120 (1) 6,200

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - - - -

Arr. - - - - -

Total Dep.

- - - 120 (1) 120 (1) 6,200

Arr. 120 (1) - - 120 (1) 6,200

2026

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - - 140 (1) 140 (1) 7,300

Arr. 140 (1) - - 140 (1) 7,300

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - 50 (1) 50 (1) 2,600

Arr. 50 (1) - - 50 (1) 2,600

Total Dep.

- - - 190 (2) 190 (2) 9,900

Arr. 190 (2) - - 190 (2) 9,900

2031

Brisbane Dep.

B737 - 100 (1) 140 (1) 240 (2) 12,500

Arr. 240 (2) - - 240 (2) 12,500

Cairns Dep.

70-seater - - 60 (1) 60 (1) 3,100

Arr. 60(1) - - 60 (1) 3,100

Total Dep.

- - 100 (1) 200 (2) 300 (3) 15,600

Arr. 300 (3) - - 300 (3) 15,600

Note 1: Number of aircraft departure/arrival is one each.

Note 2: Annual passengers are calculated as 52 times the weekly passenger movements.

Note 3: As for passengers for Brisbane on Friday in 2031, though potential daily passengers are 340, it is

assumed that passengers are limited by 90% of seat capacity of B737.


4-28

4.8 Airport Access Traffic

4.8.1 Study Flow

Traffic volume generated by an activity of air passengers is calculated based on the design day passenger movements as shown in Figure 4.8-1. Several planning factors colored in the study flow are surveyed at Nadzab/Lae Airport.

PMV: Public Motor Vehicle

Figure 4.8-1 Study Flow of Airport Access Traffic Forecast

4.8.2 Planning Factors

1) Well-wisher Ratio The number of well-wisher is surveyed by interview with air passengers. The number of well-wisher per air passenger is set as shown in Table 4.8-1. 2) Airport Staff Ratio Airport staff ratio is set as 0.25 staff per daily

Airport Staff

Well-Wisher Ratio Airport Staff Ratio

Modal Split forPassenger+Well-wisher

Passenger & Well-wisher by Access Mode

Private Car PMV Coach

Airport Staff by Access Mode

Private Car PMV

Modal Split forAirport Staff

Design Day PassengersWell-Wisher

Users by Access Mode


Traffic Volume by Access Mode


Number of Usersper Vehicle

Table 4.8-1 Well-wisher Ratio

Well-wishers per Passenger0.82

Airport Staff per Daily Passenger0.25

Table 4.8-2 Airport Staff Ratio


4-29

passenger based on the current number of airport staff (around 200) and average daily passengers (around 800). 3) Modal Split The modal split for air passengers and well-wisher is surveyed by interview with air passengers. The modal split is set as shown in Table 4.8-3. The modal split for airport staff is set as shown in Table 4.8-4 by the assumption that NAC staff and half of airline staff use private car.

Table 4.8-3 Modal Split for Air Passengers and Well-wisher

Table 4.8-4 Modal Split for Airport Staff

4) Number of Users per Vehicle The number of users per vehicle is surveyed by interview with air passengers, and set as shown in Table 4.8-5.

Private Car PMV Coach66% 24% 10%

Private Car PMV48% 52%

Table 4.8-5 Number of Users per Vehicle

Private Car PMV Coach2.7 6.3 2.6


4-30

4.8.3 Traffic Volume Based on the future demand and planning factors, traffic volume on design day are calculated as shown in Table 4.8-6

Table 4.8-6 Estimated Traffic Volume

2021 2026 2031Design Day Passengers Domesutic (passengers/day) 1,840 2,200 2,630

International (passengers/day) 240 380 400Total (passengers/day) 2,080 2,580 3,030 ①

Well-wisher/Welcomer (persons/day) 1,710 2,120 2,480 ② =①×0.82Airport Staff (persons/day) 520 650 760 ③ =①×0.25

Private Car (persons/day) 2,500 3,100 3,640 ④ =（①+②）×66%PMV (persons/day) 910 1,130 1,320 ⑤ =（①+②）×24%Coach (persons/day) 380 470 550 ⑥ =（①+②）×10%Private Car (persons/day) 500 620 730 ⑦ =③×48%×2PMV (persons/day) 540 680 790 ⑧ =③×52%×2Private Car (persons/day) 3,000 3,720 4,370 ⑨ =④＋⑦

PMV (persons/day) 1,450 1,810 2,110 ⑩ =⑤＋⑧

Coach (persons/day) 380 470 550 ⑪ =⑥Private Car (vehicles/day) 1,110 1,380 1,620 ⑫ =⑨/2.7PMV (vehicles/day) 230 290 330 ⑬ =⑩/6.3Coach (vehicles/day) 150 180 210 ⑭ =⑪/2.6Total (vehicles/day) 1,490 1,850 2,160 ⑮ =⑫＋⑬＋⑭

(vehicles/hour) 190 240 280 ⑯ =⑮×0.130

Passenger and Well-wisherby Access Mode

Airport Staffby Access Mode

Users by Access Mode

Traffic Volumeby Access Mode


4-31

4.9 Annual Air Cargo

4.9.1 Relation between Air Passenger and Air Cargo

According to the data provided by Air Niugini, the relation between the air passenger and air cargo is a as shown in Table 4.9-1. The air cargo volume is generated at a ratio of 0.01 tons per annual passenger on the route of Lae - Port Moresby, and 0.005 tons per annual passenger on the other routes.

Table 4.9-1 Relation between Air Passenger and Air Cargo

4.9.2 Annual Air Cargo Demand

Based on the air cargo volume per annual passenger and future annual passenger demand, annual cargo volume is forecast as shown in Table 4.9-2.

LAE-POM

2010 185,000 2,011 0.01092011 192,000 1,850 0.00962012 154,000 1,592 0.0103Ave. 0.0103 → 0.01 ton/annual PAX

Note: 2012 data include Jan-Sep.Source: Air Niugini

Other thanLAE-POM

2010 30,000 193 0.00642011 22,000 100 0.00452012 15,000 75 0.0050Ave. 0.0053 → 0.005 ton/annual PAX

Note: 2012 data include Jan-Sep.Source: Air Niugini

AnnualPassengers

AnnualCargo(ton)

Cargo/Passengers

AnnualPassengers

AnnualCargo(ton)

Cargo/Passengers


4-32

Table 4.9-2 Annual Air Cargo Demand

year Airline AircraftAnnual

Passengers(thousand)

Cargo/Passengers

(kg/pax)

AnnualCargo(ton)

2021 ANG LAE-POM 367 10 3,670Others 41 5 205

APNG 132 5 660TA 48 5 240

NCA 12 5 60600 4,835


APNG 158 5 790TA 57 5 285

NCA 14 5 70718 5,795


APNG 189 5 945TA 69 5 345

NCA 17 5 85858 6,915

year RouteAnnual

Passengers(thousand)

Cargo/Passengers

(kg/pax)

AnnualCargo(ton)

2021 Brisbane 12 10 120Cairns 0 10 0Total 12 120



Total

Total

Total

International

Domestic


4-33

4.10 Summary Result of Passenger, Cargo and Aircraft Movements Forecast

Table 4.10-1 summarizes result of the annual and peak-day passenger, cargo and aircraft movements at Nadzab/Lae Airport for years 2021 through 2031.

Table 4.10-1 Summary for Future Demand

Description 2021 2026 2031

Domestic Passengers

Annual (passengers) 600,000 718,000 858,000

Peak Day (passengers) 1,840 2,200 2,630

International Passengers

Annual (passengers) 12,000 20,000 31,000

Peak Day (passengers) 240 380 600

Daily Aircraft Movements

Domestic

B737 4 6 10

70-seater 32 34 34

F50 6 6 6

BN 6 8 10

Total 48 54 60

Weekly Aircraft Movements

International

B737 2 2 4

70-seater - 2 2

Total 2 4 6

Domestic Cargo Annual (ton) 4,800 5,800 6,900

International Cargo Annual (ton) 120 200 310

SECTION 5

VERIFICATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND

EXAMINATION OF FACILITY REQUIREMENTS


5-1

SECTION 5: VERIFICATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND EXAMINATION OF FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Target of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project

5.1.1 Requirements to Enable Future Role of Nadzab/Lae Airport

As discussed in Subsection 2.3.4, future role of Nadzab/Lae Airport is considered as one of the regional airports:

Capable of accommodating short to medium range international and domestic operations by B737-800 class aircraft; and

Alternative to Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport in case of its temporary closure due to bad weather, etc.

In addition to the rehabilitation of obsolete and deteriorated facilities and equipment, the target of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project (the Project) may be defined based on its future role mentioned above as upgrading:


As the second busiest domestic airport capable of accommodating up to B737 (to be upgraded from current F100); and

To an alternate airport for Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport.

1) Upgrading to the Second International Airport

At present there is only one international airport in Papua New Guinea; Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport. One of the targets of the Project is to upgrade Nadzab/Lae Airport to the second international airport in Papua New Guinea with scheduled international flights. The air traffic demand forecast has revealed that there would be some international air passenger demand between Lae and Brisbane by B737 and Cairns by 70-seater class aircraft in 2021 and 2026, and therefore Nadzab Airport should be capable of accommodating B737-700/800 with operational take-off weight to Brisbane (distance from Lae to Brisbane is approx. 2382km=1286NM).

From facility planning viewpoint, commencement of the international scheduled flights would necessitate: Improvements of the runway, taxiways and apron dimensions and strength; Provision of the international passenger processing/amenity areas and equipment; Provision of the international cargo storage and processing areas and equipment; Upgrading of the rescue and fire-fighting station and equipment; and Improvement to accommodate nighttime operations.


5-2

The international passenger processing/amenity areas and equipment may be utilized for the domestic passenger handling when no international passenger needs to be accommodated.

2) Upgrading to the Second Busiest Domestic Airport

In addition to the requirements related to the commencement of international scheduled flights, enhancement of the domestic passenger and cargo handling capacity and service grade would be required.

3) Upgrading to an Alternate Airport for Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport

An alternate airport should be capable of accommodating diverted aircraft from Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport. The diverted aircraft was about to land at Jacksons but was not able to do due to severe bad weather or any other adverse operational conditions. The aircraft would have already consumed most of its fuel. When the adverse operational conditions disappear, the diverted aircraft would fly to Jackson/Port Moresby, approx. 300km away from Nadzab Airport. Therefore, the operational take-off weight is much smaller than those required for the international scheduled departures; and hence the runway length and strength. However, the geometry of the runway, taxiways and apron should be adequate for ground maneuvering of Code E aircraft. Air Niugini will replace current B767 with Code E aircraft. So far B787-8 and B777-200 are being considered as the replacement. As B777-200 has wider wheel span and longer wheel base than B787-8, the taxiway fillets and dimension of the 180-degree turn pad have been examined based on B777-200 data. Detail is to be reviewed based on decision by Air Niugini in the design works during the project implementation stage.

4) Opening Day and Target Year for Formulation of Airport Master Plan

Terms of Reference (TOR) issued by JICA to the JICA Survey Team defines the Opening Day and the Target Year for formulation of the Nadzab Airport Master Rehabilitation/Development Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Airport Master Plan”) as follows: Opening Day: Year 2021; and Target Year for the Airport Mater Plan: 2026.

It means that the Project will be completed by 2021, and on its opening day, Nadzab/Lae Airport will have an adequate capacity to accommodate the forecast airport traffic of 2026; five years after the Opening Day. The airport facility after completion of its development should be capable of accommodating somehow future traffic demand, but not so far distant future as unreasonably large initial investment compared to the anticipated level of the traffic demand cannot be financially and economically justifiable. It is a common practice in airport planning in Japan to prepare a phased development concept typically at 5-year interval. Meanwhile, NAC requested that ten


5-3

years after the opening day should be chosen as the target year. During the presentation meeting held on July 1st, 2014, attended by NAC staff, JICA representatives and JICA Study Team, NAC

explained that “in Morobe Region there is a strong potential of demand increase at Nadzab Airport

such as the international business activities and mineral exploitation, and the airport traffic demand

might unexpectedly increase. And NAC is not likely to be able to invest in further development of the

airport shortly after the completion of the Project. So Nadzab Airport should have a handling

capacity adequate to cater for the forecast traffic demand 10 years after the opening day; 2031. This

is obviously the case when we see the past experience of Jackson’s Airport redevelopment by Japan’s

Yen Loan.”

There should be no difference in principle of the facility requirements in 2026 and 2031 of the runway, taxiways, apron and the aeronautical ground lights as well as the administration building, rescue and fire-fighting station and the control tower, etc. There could be very minor difference of the refurbishment of the existing passenger terminal for conversion to the cargo terminal. There would be some difference in the floor space requirement of the new passenger terminal building in 2026 and 2031 (difference is approx. 300m2).

It is true that physical expansion of the terminal building a few years after its opening would be an annoyance for efficient and safe terminal operation. It would be much easier for NAC to increase the terminal capacity if adequate floor space equivalent to the 2031 requirement is provided from the beginning and the terminal equipment to be added according to the traffic increase. Thus following phased development concept has been proposed:

a) Initial capacity of the new passenger terminal building; year 2026 (5 years after opening). b) Initial capacity of the terminal equipment such as check-in counters, security check

equipment, etc.; year 2026 (5 years after opening). c) Initial floor space of the new passenger terminal building; equivalent to year 2031 (10 years

after opening).


5-4

5.2 Planning Considerations and Parameters

5.2.1 Planning Considerations

1) Design Aircraft

As discussed in 5.1.1 above, the design aircraft for the scheduled operation should be B737-800. However, in some cases, selection of Code E aircraft such as B777-200 as the design aircraft may be more reasonable and justifiable; the cement concrete pavement, for example, having its general life cycle of 20 years or more, should be designed for Code E as once it is constructed for B737, reinforcement to cope with B777-200 would involve several engineering challenges and would be costly and troublesome for airport operation. Therefore due consideration should be paid to any requirements to accommodate B777-200 in future.

With regard to the requirements as an alternate airport for PMIA, the geometry of the runway, taxiways and apron should allow safe ground maneuvering of B777-200 in accordance with ICAO requirements. The existing location of the runway, taxiways and apron as well as the passenger terminal building comply with the separation distance requirements stipulated in ICAO Annex 14 applicable to B777-200. At initial stage, the geometry of apron and its taxiway should be such that it allows taxiing of B777-200 while B737 is parked on the apron and vice versa. Simultaneous use of the apron and its taxiway by B777-200 should be considered as a future requirement. The runway and taxiway pavement strength, when designed to accommodate B737, has been checked to ensure acceptability of occasional overload operation by B777-200.

In summary, the design aircraft for formulation of the Airport Master Plan should be understood in principle as follows:

B737-800 generally with due consideration to accommodate B777-200 in future. B777-200 for geometry of the taxiways and apron, inevitably required for ground

maneuvering of diverted aircraft.

Figures 5.2-1, 5.2-2 and 5.2-3 show general dimension of B737-800, B787-8 and B777-200 taken from Boeing database.


5-5

Figure 5.2-1 General Dimension of B737-800 (Source: Boeing)


5-6



5-7



5-8

2) Aerodrome Reference Code (ANNEX 14)

Relevant Aerodrome reference code of ICAO Annex 14 is defined as a combination of the aeroplane reference field length as well as the wing span and outer main gear wheel span of design aircraft as shown in Table 5.2-1.

Table 5.2-1 Aerodrome Reference Code defined in ICAO Annexn14 Code Element 1 Code Element 2

Code Number

Aeroplane Reference Field Length Code Letter Wing Span Outer main gear wheel

span 1 Less than 800 m A Up to but not

including 15 m Up to but not including

4.5 m 2 800 m up to but not

including 1200 m B 15 m up to but not including 24 m

4.5 m up to but not including 6 m

3 1200 m up to but not including 1800 m C 24 m up to but not

including 36 m 6 m up to but not

including 9 m 4 1800 m and over D 36 m up to but not

including 52m 9 m up to but not including 14 m

E 52 m up to but not including 65m

9 m up to but not including 14 m

F 65 m up to but not including 80m

14 m up to but not including 16 m

Source: ICAO Annex 14 Fifth Edition, July 2009

Relevant information and categorization of B737-800 and B777-200 are shown in Table 5.2-2 below.

Table 5.2-2 Aerodrome Reference Code applicable to Nadzab/Lae Airport

Aircraft Aeroplane Reference

Field Length Wing Span

Outer Main Gear

Wheel Span

Applicable

Reference Code Wheel Base

B737-800 More than 1800m 35.79m 7.00m 4C 15.60m

B777-200 More than 1800m 60.93m 12.37m 4E 25.88m

It should be noted that the outer main gear wheel span of Dash8-Q400 is more than 9m and is categorized as Code 3D which requires the taxiway width of 23m according to ANNEX 14. However this type of aircraft has been regarded as exceptional case and is currently allowed to operate on 15-m wide taxiways. Dash8-Q400 currently operated by Air Niugini will be replaced by F70 or other type of aircraft in few years because of its low high fuel consumption. Therefore, facility requirement relevant to the categorization of Dash8-Q400 to Code 3D has not been taken into account.


5-9

3) Approach Category of Runway

The current approach category of the runway is “non-precision instrument approach” as defined in ICAO Annex 14. This category will remain the same in future as installation of ILS at Nadzab is not included in the scope of PNG ADS-B, MLAT and ATM System (PAMAS: see item 2) of 2.1.5).

The wind flows from the east and west throughout the year, frequently changing the direction during a day. Currently, VOR/DME approach procedures are established for both RWY 09 (visibility 2300m) and RWY 29 (visibility 2400m). In case a pilot cannot see the runway from 2300m (RWY 09 approach) or 2400m (RWY 27 approach), the pilot must make missed approach. According to hearing survey at Nadzab, such adverse weather condition necessitating the missed approach has rarely occurred.

Table 5.2-2-2 shows occurrences of the visibility conditions provided by the National Weather Services. The worst visibility recorded was 3000m occurred in June, July and August. Low visibility conditions below VOR/DME weather minima (RWY 09: 2300m, RWY 27: 2400m) never occurred. Therefore priority of ILS installation at Nadzab Airport can be concluded low and current category of non-precision instrument approach runway suffices.

Table5.2-2-2 Occurrences of Visibility Conditions (September 2013 to August 2014)

3000m 5000m 8000m 10000m 20000m 30000m 40000m

September － 4.17% － 0.83% 15.83% 18.33% 60.83%

October －－－－ 11.29% 8.06% 80.65%

November －－ 0.83% 0.83% 5.00% 14.17% 79.17%

December －－－－ 0.81% 20.16% 79.03%

January －－－－ 1.61% 7.26% 91.13%

February －－－－ 0.89% 5.36% 93.75%

March －－－－ 3.23% 5.65% 91.13%

April － 0.83% －－ 4.17% 9.17% 85.83%

May －－－－ 5.65% 12.10% 82.26%

June 0.83% － 0.83% － 7.5% 21.67% 69.17%

July 4.84% 5.65% 4.03% － 12.90% 20.97% 51.61%

August 0.81% 0.81% 1.61% － 6.45% 12.10% 78.23%

Note. Observations were made 4 times a day at 07:00, 10:00, 13:00 and 16:00

Data Source: National Weather Services


5-10

4) Target Passenger Service Grade

International Air Transportation Association (IATA) published “Airport Development Reference Manual” (hereinafter referred to as “ADRM”), in which IATA presented several levels of service as shown in Table 5.2-3.

Table 5.2-3 Passenger Terminal Levels of Service

Level of Service Space Time

Overdesign Excessive or empty space. Overprovision of resources.

Optimum

Sufficient space to accommodate the necessary functions in a comfortable environment.

Acceptable processing and waiting times.

Suboptimum Crowded and uncomfortable Unacceptable processing and waiting times

Source: “Airport Development Reference Manual” 10th Edition

IATA ADRM also describes level of service guidelines for airport terminal facilities from level A and level B as overdesign, level C as optimum, and level D and level E as suboptimum (see Table 5.2-4).

For formulation of Nadzab/Lae Airport Master Plan, the level of service of C has been chosen as the target passenger service grade as it represents the optimum level of service.


5-11

Table 5.2-4 Level of Service Guidelines for Airport Terminal Facilities

A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D EOptimum Optimum Optimum Optimum

2.3Check-in Self-Service Boarding

Pass/Tagging 1.3-1.8 0-2 0-2Bag Drop Desk

(queue width:1.4-1.6m) 1.3-1.8 0-5 0-3

1.3-1.8 10-20 3-5

0-3

1.0-1.2 5-10 0-3

1.0-1.2 5-10 0-3

Boarding Seating 1.5-1.7Gate Lounge Standing

1.0-1.2 50%-70%*1

1.0-1.2 10 55 0-3

1.5-1.7 0-151.5-1.7 0-25

1.2-1.7 15%-20%*1

4.0*1 The lower limit is only to be considered if extensive F+B seating is provided in the departure lounge,or,concession zone seating available

Source:IATA

Wide Body

Public Arrival Hall

CIP Lounges

Immigration(Passport Control)(queue width:1.2m)

TransfersBaggage Claim Area

Narrow Body0-15 >15

>1.7 <1.2

n.b.Priority bags to be delivered beforeEconomy

>1.7 <1.5>1.7 <1.5

<0<0

Over design Suboptimum

SPACE STANDARDS FOR WAITING AREAS(㎡/PAX)

WAITING TIME STANDARDSFOR PROCESSING FACILITIES

(Minutes)

WAITING TIME STANDARDSFOR PROCESSING FACILITIES

(Minutes)

PROPORTION OF SEATED OCCUPANTS(%)

Economy Class Business Class/First Class

Over design Suboptimum Over design Suboptimum Over design Suboptimum

>3

Passenger Terminal ProcessorADRM 9th Edition

ADRM 10th Edition

Public Departure Hall>2.3 <2.3

>1.8 <1.3 0 >2 0

First Class Check-in Desk

>1.8 <1.3

>1.8 <1.3

0 >5

<10 >20

0 >3Business Class Check-in Desk

<3 >5

0 >3Security Checkpoint

(queue width:1.2m) >1.2 <1 <5 >10 0 >3

Check-in Desk(queue width:1.4-1.6m)

Fast Track

>1.2 <1 <5 >10 0 >3Fast TrackEmigration(Passport Control)

(queue width:1.2m)

>1.7 <1.5

>1.2 <1 >70% <50%

>1.2 <1 <10 >10

>20% <15%

<5 >5

Fast Track

0 >3<5 >5

First passenger to first bag First passenger to first bag>15>25

0


5-12

5.2.2 Planning Parameters

1) Passenger, Cargo and Aircraft Movements

The facility requirements of major airport facilities are examined generally based on the forecast passenger, cargo and aircraft movements as shown below:

Number of runways, layout of runways and taxiways; peak-hour aircraft movements. Number of aircraft parking stands; peak-hour aircraft arrivals. Passenger terminal building floor spaces as well as number and type of terminal equipment;

peak-hour (or shorter time period) passenger movements. Cargo terminal building floor space; annual cargo movements. Level of the rescue and fire-fighting service; size of the largest aircraft and monthly number

of landings. Pavement strength; Annual number and weight of aircraft departures.

Based on the forecast air traffic demand, these passenger, cargo and aircraft movements are summarized as the planning parameters as shown below.

a) Peak-hour Passengers

Table 5.2-5 summarizes the peak-hour domestic and international passenger movements.

The domestic peak-hour passenger movements have been estimated based on the forecast annual passenger movements as well as peak-day/peak-hour rations and a weight for one-way. The international peak-hour passenger movements have been obtained based on an assumption that the B737 flight to/from Brisbane and the 70-seater flight to/from Cairns would not be operated during the same hour (assumed load factor of 80%).

Table 5.2-5 Assumed Domestic and International Peak-hour Passenger Movements

Year

Domestic Passengers Peak-hour International Passengers

Annual Daily Peak-hour

(Two-way)

Peak-hour

(One-way)

Brisbane (BNE) and Cairns (CNS)

2026 718,000 2,200 290 194 BNE: B737-800 (158 seat) x 80%=126.4

2031 858,000 2,630 340 228

Note. Domestic Peak-day ratio: 1/326, Domestic Peak-hour ratio: 0.13, Weight for one-way: 0.67

b) Peak-hour Aircraft Movements

The peak-hour aircraft arrivals have been estimated based on the forecast daily aircraft movements and the peak-hour ratio as shown in Table 5.2-6.


5-13

Table 5.2-6 Domestic and International Peak-hour Aircraft Arrivals

Year

Domestic International

B737 F70, ATR 72, etc. F50/BN Total

Brisbane and

Cairns 158-seater 70-seater 50-seater /9-seater

2026 0.39 2.21 0.91 3.51 B737-800 x 1

2031 0.65 2.21 1.04 3.90

c) Annual Cargo Volume

Table 5.2-7 shows the forecast annual cargo volume.

Table 5.2-7 Annual Cargo Volume

Year Domestic Cargo (t) International Cargo (t)

2021 4,800 120

2026 5,800 200

2031 6,900 310

2) Runway System

The existing single runway system suffices the requirement for Nadzab Airport, however its width should be widened to 45m and strength should be improved based on the design aircraft.

3) Taxiway System

The existing taxiway system consisting of two stub taxiways and a parallel taxiway in principle suffices the requirements for Nadzab Airport. Its current width of 15m is sufficient to accommodate up to B737 type aircraft but needs to be widened to 23m in case it should cater for bigger aircraft than B737. The strength must be improved to cater for B737. The new terminal/apron layout plan might require an addition of a taxiway.

4) Aircraft Parking Stands

a) Domestic

The aircraft parking stand requirements for embarkation/disembarkation of the passengers have been estimated based on the forecast peak-hour domestic aircraft arrivals as well as assumed stand occupancy time plus allowance.

The peak hour arrivals are as shown in Table 5.2-6.

For domestic operation of B737 class aircraft, a period of 60 minutes has been used as the stand occupancy time with reference to Japanese standard planning parameter as any past domestic operational record of turnaround time of B737 fixed to a passenger boarding bridge was not available. Stand occupancy time of the other types of aircraft has been assumed to


5-14

be 50 minutes based on the average stand occupancy time of 47 minutes of Air Niugini and Airline PNG aircraft. As the seating capacity of B737 is larger than the other types of aircraft, the stand occupancy time should also be longer.

Allowance factor of 1.2 has also been applied to ensure flexibility in utilization of aircraft parking stands.

The required number of aircraft parking stands has been estimated by the equation below. It should be noted that one reserved stand for B737 has been provided to serve for both domestic and international and any overnight aircraft may be accommodated by the stands for embarkation/disembarkation of the passengers.

N=ΣAi x Ti x 1.2/60+S Where N: Number of parking stands required Ai: Number of peak-hour arriving aircraft movements (type-i) Ti: Aircraft stand occupancy time; 60minutes for B737/50minutes for the others S: Number of reserve stands

b) International

The international aircraft parking stand requirements have been estimated based of the following:

One flight each to/from Brisbane by B737 and to Cairns by 70-seater aircraft would not overlap in the same hour requiring one stand for B737 only.

c) Summary

Table 5.2-8 summarizes the aircraft parking stand requirements for the domestic and international operations.

Table 5.2-8 Summary Requirements of Aircraft Parking Stands

Item Aircraft Description 2026 2031

Domestic

B737 (Code C) Peak-hour landings 0.39 0.65

Required No. of Parking Stands 1 1

70-seater (Code C) Peak-hour landings 2.21 2.21


Others Peak-hour landings 0.91 1.04



5-15

International B737 Required No. of Parking Stands 1 1

70-seater Required No. of Parking Stands 1 1

Reserve B737 Required No. of Parking Stands 1 1

Total

B737

Required No. of Parking Stands

3 3

70-seater 4 4

Others 1 2

Total 8 9

5) Required Floor Space and Major Terminal Equipment of Passenger Terminal Building

a) Facility Requirements

Based on the number of one-way peak hour passengers shown in Table 5.2-5, the required floor spaces of the passenger terminal building for the target years 2026 and 2031 have been estimated with reference to the planning method of the IATA Airport Development Reference Manual (IATA ADRM: 10th Edition) as well as the airport facility planning references of the Civil Aviation Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Japan.

Tables 5.2-9 and 5.2-10 present the summary of facility requirements for the new passenger terminal building.

IATA ADRM References are shown in Tables 5.2-11 through 5.2-13.


5-16

Table 5.2-9 Summary Facility Requirements for New PTB (Target year 2026)

Domestic International Common Total

Check-in Lobby 176 125 301 IATA　ADRM

Departure Lobby 585 585 193×(1+0.82)×40/60×2.5=707

Security Inspection 72 72 144 IATA　ADRM

Departure Passport Control 58 58 IATA　ADRM

Departure Lounge 297 220 517 IATA　ADRM

Concource 1000 1000 Assumed

Arrival Passport Control 82 82 IATA　ADRM

Baggage Claim Area 278 399 677 IATA　ADRM

Customs Inspection 90 90 IATA　ADRM

Arrival Lobby 75 49 124 IATA　ADRM

Departure Baggage Handling Area 200 200 400 Assumed

Arreival Baggage Handling Area 200 200 400 Assumed

Subtotal 1298 1495 1585 4378

Passenger Service Area

Airline Lounge 150 150 Assumed

VIP Room 150 150 Assumed

Waiting Room/Chargeable/Group 100 100 Assumed

Meeting room 100 100 Assumed

Concession

Food and Beverage 200 200 Assumed

Selling Goods 200 200 Assumed

Foreign Currency Exchange 50 50 Assumed

Cell phone 50 50 Assumed

Rental Car 50 50 Assumed

Subtotal 0 50 1000 1050

Offices

Airline Offices 400 200 600 Assumed

CIQ Offices 200 200 Assumed

NAC Office 50 50 Assumed

Police Office 50 50 Assumed

Other Offices 50 50 Assumed

Subtotal 500 400 50 950

Mechanical/Electrical Service

Mechanical Room 400 400

Electrical Room 60 60

Subtotal 0 0 460 460

Total 1798 1945 3095 6838

Toilets,Passages,Shaft,etc 629 681 1083 2393 35% of total area

Overall Total 2427 2626 4178 9231

FacilityFloor Space （㎡）

Passenger Processing Area

Remarks


5-17

Table 5.2-10 Summary Facility Requirements for New PTB (Target year 2031)

Domestic International Common Total

Check-in Lobby 213 125 338 IATA　ADRM

Departure Lobby 689 689 227×(1+0.82)×40/60×2.5=689

Security Inspection 72 72 144 IATA　ADRM

Departure Passport Control 58 58 IATA　ADRM

Departure Lounge 350 220 570 IATA　ADRM

Concource 1000 1000 Assumed

Arrival Passport Control 82 82 IATA　ADRM

Baggage Claim Area 278 399 677 IATA　ADRM

Customs Inspection 90 90 IATA　ADRM

Arrival Lobby 86 49 135 IATA　ADRM

Departure Baggage Handling Area 200 200 400 Assumed

Arreival Baggage Handling Area 200 200 400 Assumed

Subtotal 1399 1495 1689 4583

Passenger Service Area

Airline Lounge 150 150 Assumed

VIP Room 150 150 Assumed

Waiting Room/Chargeable/Group 100 100 Assumed

Meeting room 100 100 Assumed

Concession

Food and Beverage 200 200 Assumed

Selling Goods 200 200 Assumed

Foreign Currency Exchange 50 50 Assumed

Cell phone 50 50 Assumed

Rental Car 50 50 Assumed

Subtotal 0 50 1000 1050

Offices

Airline Offices 400 200 600 Assumed

CIQ Offices 200 200 Assumed

NAC Office 50 50 Assumed

Police Office 50 50 Assumed

Other Offices 50 50 Assumed

Subtotal 500 400 50 950

Mechanical/Electrical Service

Mechanical Room 400 400

Electrical Room 60 60

Subtotal 0 0 460 460

Total 1899 1945 3199 7043

Toilets,Passages,Shaft,etc 665 681 1120 2465 35% of total area

Overall Total 2564 2626 4319 9508

FacilityFloor Space （㎡）

Remarks

Passenger Processing Area


5-18

Table 5.2-11 Reference on the floor area requirements for PTB international flight facilities 2026 and 2031 (IATA ADRM)

IATA Airport Development Reference Manual 10th Edition

PNG NADZAB INT 2026_2031

PY Passengers per Year

10% Peak Month to Year IATA ADRM 9th Edition Table C2-2,3

PMP 0 Peak Month Passengers

4% Peak Day to Peak Month

PDP 0 Peak Day Passengers

9% Peak Hour to Peak Day

PHP Peak Hour Passengers

2/3 Offset Factor

PHPo 126 Originating Peak Hour Passengers

2/3 Offset Factor

PHPt 126 Terminating Peak Hour Passengers

PK 65% Peak 30-minute Factor (in % of PHP)

Self Service Facilities

A 5

SS 2

Baggage Drop

Al 0

Au 0

BD 0

Traditional Check-In (Not Recommended)

A 125

CD 6

Departures Requirements: Emigration

A 58

PD 3

Passenger Security Screening (Condition A)

A 72

SEC 2

Passenger Security Screening (Condition B)

A 107

SEC 3

Boarding Gates

A1 220

A2 0

Arrivals Requirements: Immigration

A 82

PC 4

Baggage Claim

BCNB 1

BCWB 0

A 399

Customs Processes

PI 2

XR 1

API 52

AXR 38

Arrival Hall

A 49

Area Required for the Self-Service Kiosks

Total Number of Self-Service Kiosks

Area Required for the Arrival Passport Control Facility

Total Number of Arrival Passport Control Desks

Area of the Gate Lounge under an open-gate configuration, serving


Area Required for the Departure Security Checkpoint Facility

Total Number of Security Lanes



Area Required for the Check-in Desks Facility for a lower boundary

Total Number of Check-in Desks

Total Number of Departure Passport Control Desks

Area Required for the Baggage Drop Facility for a lower boundary

Area Required for the Baggage Drop Facility for an upper boundary

Total Number of Baggage Drop Positions

Area Required for the Departure Passport Control Facility

Area of the Arrival Hall

Area of the baggage reclaim hall (m2)

Number of Narrow Body baggage claim units

Number of Wide Body baggage claim units

Number of Primary Inspection Booths (single units)

Number of X-ray units

Area Required for the Primary Inspection Booth

Area Required for the X-ray Facility


5-19

Table 5.2-12 Reference on the floor area requirements for PTB domestic flight facilities 2026 (IATA ADRM)

・


PNG NADZAB DOM 2026

PY 718,000 Passengers per Year


PMP 71,800 Peak Month Passengers


PDP 2,872 Peak Day Passengers


PHP 290 Peak Hour Passengers

2/3 Offset Factor


2/3 Offset Factor




A 7

SS 2

Baggage Drop

Al 0

Au 0

BD 0


A 176

CD 8


A 72

SEC 2


A 107

SEC 3

Boarding Gates

A1 297

A2 0

Baggage Claim

BCNB 1

BCWB 0

A 278

Arrival Hall

A 75



















5-20

Table 5.2-13 Reference on the floor area requirements for PTB domestic flight facilities 2031 (IATA ADRM)


PNG NADZAB DOM 2031

PY 858,000 Passengers per Year


PMP 85,800 Peak Month Passengers


PDP 3,432 Peak Day Passengers


PHP 340 Peak Hour Passengers

2/3 Offset Factor


2/3 Offset Factor




A 7

SS 2

Baggage Drop

Al 0

Au 0

BD 0


A 213

CD 10


A 72

SEC 2


A 107

SEC 3

Boarding Gates

A1 350

A2 0

Baggage Claim

BCNB 1

BCWB 0

A 278

Arrival Hall

A 86



















5-21

b) Provision for Capacity Enhancement from Target Year 2026 to Target Year 2031

The size of the passenger processing area in PTB is determined mainly according to the peak-hour passenger volume. As a prerequisite of required floor area calculation, the difference in the number of peak-hour passengers affects the size of facility. The peak-hour passenger has been estimated to be 290 for domestic flights and 126.4 for the international in 2026, and 340 for the domestic and 126.4 for the international in 2031.

Regarding the sizes of facility targeted in 2026 and 2031, the difference in the required floor area is approximately 300 m2 in total, and occurs in the following areas; Departure Lounge, Check-in Lobby, Immigration, Arrival Lobby, and Departure Lobby. The number of check-in counters is deemed to be unchanged if its use is exclusive to each airline company. If the common use counters are adopted, eight counters will be needed for the 2026 and ten counters for 2031 respectively.

The required capability of special equipment for the airport functions is as follows:

<Conveyer> For the baggage handling conveyer, the departure side conveyer would differ in length according to the number of installed check-in counters, however, the length of arrival side conveyer does not need to change because the arriving largest aircraft is still the same and it would not arrive simultaneously.

<Security Equipment> For the security equipment, two detectors each will be needed for the international and the domestic area, and no difference would occur due to the target years.

Considering above mentioned elements, it is deemed appropriate to design the passenger terminal building itself to accommodate the demand of year 2031, because the difference in the required floor area is minimal and small amount of investment increase would reduce the complexity of future expansion while it’s operating. On the other hand, as for the special equipment, it is deemed appropriate to design aiming for the year 2026 as it is relatively easy to expand according to the demand increase in the future, hence the passenger terminal as a whole should be designed to accommodate the year 2026 passenger estimation.

In light of future development, provision for the future expansion of special equipment should be made regarding the following items:

・ Extra pit for future departure baggage handling conveyer; ・ Extra pit for future check-in counter wiring; ・ Extra space for future CIQ counter expansion;


5-22

・ Extra space for future CUTE/FIDS system (Server space, Monitor installation preparation, etc.); and

・ Estimation and preparation for future power demand.

6) Required Floor Space of Cargo Terminal Building

Based on the forecast air cargo traffic demand as well as assumed cargo throughputs, the floor space requirements of the cargo terminal building has been estimated as shown in Table 5.2-14 through following process: i) Based on the forecast cargo volume, cargo terminal throughputs were computed using an

equation of C (t/m2) =0.0096 x X0.77; ii) The equation was developed in experiences in Japan for cargo terminal development up to

annual cargo volume 10,000 tons; iii) The computed throughput for 2026 was 7.79 t/m2; iv) The required floor space (Cargo handling area) for 2026 was obtained as 770 m2 by the cargo

volume of 6,000t divided by 7.79 t/m2. v) The computed throughput for 2031 was 8.97 t/m2; vi) The required floor space (Cargo handling area) for 2031 was obtained as 804 m2 by the cargo

volume of 7,210 t divided by 8.97 t/m2. vii) Required office area is empirically estimated as two thirds of the cargo handling area

according to similar projects in Japan.

Table 5.2-14 Computation of Facility Requirement of Cargo Terminal

ＤｏｍｅｓｔｉｃＩｎｔｅｒｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ

Annual Passengers(thousand)

Annual Passengers(thousand)

2021 600 4,800 12 120

2026 718 5,800 20 200

2031 858 6,900 31 310

Cargo floor areacalculation

Calculated unitCcargo handling zone

floor area(㎡）Office Area

(㎡)Total(㎡)

2021 Ｃ＝0.0096x 49200.77

6.68 737 491 1,228

2026 Ｃ＝0.0096 x60000.77 7.79 770 513 1,284

2031 Ｃ＝0.0096 x72100.77 8.97 804 536 1,340

7,210

Annual CａｒｇｏＡｍｏｕｎｔ　(tｏｎ)

Formula: Unit rate between cargoquantity per floor area at handling zone. (ton/m2)

Forecast ofCargo Demand

Annual Cａｒｇｏ(tｏｎ)

Annual Cａｒｇｏ(tｏｎ)

4,920

6,000

Amount of cargo (ton/year) Lay out conceptLess than 5,000ton common occupation 5,000～10,000ton Common or separate occupation

More than 10,000ton Separate occupation

Amount to handle ( ton/year) Unit (ton/㎡）1,000 22,000 3.35,000 6.810,000 11.5

10,000～50,000 11.5～15.0More than 50,000 More than 15.0

( Reference data for planning airport facilities, year 2008) by the ministry of land and transportation ,Japan.

Format of layout for cargo facility

Ｃ(ton/㎡)=2.201ｎＸ－8.78by other Formula

Formula ( X=ton/year ) Unit to handle annual cargo amount.

Ｃ(ton/㎡)=0.0096X0.77


5-23

7) Required Number of Lanes of Forecourt Road and Vehicle Parking Spaces in Car Park

It has been proposed that the forecourt road in front of the passenger terminal building consists of three lanes as listed below:

One for loading/unloading passengers; One for approach to the loading/unloading lane; and One for through traffic.

With regard to the car park, number of parking spaces has been estimated as shown below:

Present number of parked vehicles has been counted as 40 observed on Friday and Saturday in May 2014;

The number of parking spaces would increase according to the increase of airport access vehicles (3.95% annual growth rate from 2021 to 2031, applied from 2014);

Number of vehicle parking spaces in 2026 would reach 70 spaces; Number of vehicle parking spaces in 2031 would reach 80 spaces; and Size of vehicle parking space; 22m2.

8) NAC Administration Building

At present, fifteen (15) NAC staffs are stationed at the existing administration office, which is about 670m2 in its total floor area, for their daily service for the operation and passenger service at Nadzab Airport. There is practically no function of monitoring the airport operations such as fire alarm, utility operations, etc. in the existing administration office. As such function is of utmost importance for efficient and safe airport operations, it has been assumed five more staff (total 20) would be stationed in a new administration building.

Required work space of newly constructed office has been computed based on a generally required unit office space of 6.0m2 per person, excluding meeting room etc. Hence required general office space is about 120m2. In addition to the general office space, such floor space for each rooms are to be added as, 150 m2 for five (5) private offices, 50m2 for a meeting room, 30m2 for a guest room, 50m2 for General Manager’s room, and about 200m2 for utilities room such as machine room, electrical room, etc. In total, required floor area for the new administration office is about 600m2.

9) Rescue and Fire-fighting Station

The aerodrome category for rescue and fire-fighting is to be determined in principle based on the overall length and maximum fuselage width of the design aircraft as shown in Table 5.2-15. The overall length and width of fuselage of B737-800 are; L=39.47m, W=3.76m, and the Category 7 is applicable.


5-24

Table 5.2-15 AeroDrome Category for Rescue and Fire Fighting

Source: ICAO Annex 14

In accordance with ICAO Annex 14, the minimum number of rescue and fire-fighting vehicles for category 7 is two. Currently, there are two fire engines at Nadzab Airport, but they are generally old and could be outdated on the opening day. It has been assumed that one unit of Fire Fighting Vehicle (FFV) equipped with a water tank of not less than 6,000 liters would be required to meet ICAO requirement.

Approximate floor space requirements for the rescue and fire-fighting station have been estimated as listed below: Stand by space for fire- engine; 300m2. Stand by space for fire- men; 100m2. Watch room; 40m2. Machine, utility room space; 100m2. Total; 540m2.

10) Required Capacity of Utilities

Following utility facilities for the entire airport are required and detail discussion is made in Subsection 5.4 and Section 6. Sub-Station (Engine Generator, Transformer); Water supply (Elevated Water tank, Deep well); Sewer (Septic Tank,); and Fire-Fighting Pump House and Water Tank.


5-25

5.3 Evaluation of Existing Facilities

Table 5.3-1 shows basic information of Nadzab Airport and Figure 5.3-1 shows layout of airport facilities.

Table 5.3-1 Basic Information of Airside facilities Items Description

ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code 4C

Aerodrome Reference Point 06o 34’ 190” S 146o 43’ 575”E

Elevation 71.0 m Reference Temperature 34.0 degree Celsius Operational Hours 24 hours Runway Runway 09/27 Dimension 2,438 m x 30 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both

side) Surface Asphalt concrete Strength PCN 30/F/B/X/U Longitudinal Slope 0.3 % Stopway (RWY 09) Dimension W = 30 m, L=60m Surface Asphalt concrete Stopway (RWY 27) Dimension W = 30 m, L=60m Surface Asphalt concrete Clearway (RWY 09) Dimension - Clearway (RWY 27) Dimension - Runway Strip Dimension 2,560 m x 150 m Taxiway Parallel Taxiway

Width 15 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both side) (by Drawing)

Surface Asphalt concrete Stub Taxiway Width 15 m (3m asphalt shoulder on both side) (by

Drawing) Surface Asphalt concrete Apron Main Loading Apron

Number of Aircraft Stands

6 stands (5 for small aircraft and 1 for B737)

Dimension/Area 430m X 90m =38,700 m2 (by CAD) Surface Asphalt concrete West Apron Dimension/Area 204m X 65m =13,260m2 (by CAD) Surface Asphalt concrete North Apron Dimension/Area 300m X 50m =15,000 m2 (by CAD)

Surface Asphalt concrete

Source: Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) April 2008, Aerodrome Directory May 2011, drawing stored

at Nadzab Airport, CAD drawing obtained from NAC


5-26

Figure 5.3-1 Layout of Nadzab Airport Facilities

EXISTING RUNWAY 2438m x 30m, STRIP WIDTH 150m

Main Apron 420m x 85m

TW

Y 'B

'

OUDOUD

OUD OUD OUD

OUDOUD

OUD

TW

Y 'K

'

TW

Y 'C

'

TW

Y 'A

'

TWY 'A' TWY 'A' TWY 'A'

TW

Y 'D

'

TW

Y 'B

'

TW

Y 'C

'

Operation Building

Carpark

Passenger TerminalBuilding

Control Tower

Fire Station

VOR/DME

Gravel Pit(Retention Pond)


5-27

5.3.1 Runway, Taxiway, Apron, Airside Storm Water Drainage and Other Facilities

1) Runway

Runway 09/27 at Nadzab airport is 2,438-m long and 30-m wide with 3-m wide shoulders on both sides. The width of runway strip is 75 m on either side of the runway center line. The runway is provided following stopways:

RWY 09; 30-m wide stopway (so-called overrun) RWY 27; 30-m wide stopway (so-called overrun)

The runway pavement structure is of an asphalt concrete pavement constructed about 40 years ago to accommodate F28 type of aircraft. Structural overlay work (5 cm thick) was conducted in 2001 in order to accommodate larger aircraft such as Fokker 100, Bombardier Q400 etc. The assumed existing runway pavement structure is shown in Figure 5.3.1-1 below. Declared strength of the runway pavement is PCN 30/F/B/X/U.

Figure 5.3.1-1 Typical Section of Existing Runway Pavement

The transverse slope of the existing runway is a single cant to the south with grooving in order to accelerate drain-out of rainfall from the runway surface to prevent hydroplaning phenomenon.

The runway needs to be widened and strengthened, among others, to achieve the Project target.

2) Taxiway

There are a parallel taxiway and four stub taxiways at Nadzab Airport. Taxiway width is 15m with 3-m wide shoulders on both sides. Current separation distance between the runway centerline and parallel taxiway centerline is approx. 213 m, which is more than required in accordance with the ICAO standard of 182.5 m for code E and 190 m for Code F. Separation distance between parallel taxiway centerline and apron taxiway centerline is approx. 181 m, which is also more than required distance 80 m for Code E and 97.5 m for Code F. The taxiway pavement is made of an asphalt concrete pavement. In 2001, asphalt overlay of 5 cm thick was conducted as a major maintenance work to accommodate larger aircraft such as Fokker 100, Bombardier Q400 etc.

Asphalt Surface Course t=50mm


Base Course t=150mm

Sub-Base Course t=300mm

Existing Runway Pavement


5-28

Some of the taxiways need to be strengthened to accommodate scheduled operation of B737.

3) Apron

There are three aircraft parking aprons as listed below: Main apron in front of the existing passenger terminal building; West apron; and North apron.

a) Main Apron

There are five (5) taxi-in taxi-out angled nose-in parking positions for small aircraft on the existing main apron in front of the passenger terminal building (PTB) and one (1) for B737 nearby the control tower. Apron flood lights are provided on the existing main apron. The size of the main apron is approx. 418 m long and 85 m depth.

The existing main apron structure is asphalt concrete pavement, and typical section of the existing main apron pavement is shown in Figure 5.3.1-2. The existing pavement is relatively in good condition. The existing main apron, after rehabilitation, will be able to accommodate up to F70 aircraft in future.

Figure 5.3.1-2 Typical Section of Exiting Main Apron Pavement

b) West Apron

The existing west apron, 204-m long and 65-m deep, is made of an asphalt concrete pavement, used by cargo transport aircraft such as C130 (transport aircraft mainly operated by charter airlines to transport construction equipment and materials).

c) North Apron

The existing north apron, 300-m long and 50-m deep, is located to the north of the existing PTB across the existing car park. Its pavement is made of an asphalt concrete pavement. It is currently utilized as storage yard of containers and construction machinery, etc.



Base Course t=150mm

Sub-Base Course t=300mm

Existing Apron Pavement


5-29

4) Airside Storm Water Drainage

Open ditches along the runway and parallel taxiway are provided at Nadzab airport. The collected rainfall flows from the west to the east, and is discharged to gravel pit (retention pond) located south east side of the runway. Pipe culverts with concrete reinforcement are provided at intersections between stub taxiway and those ditches. The surface of these open ditches is covered with weeds; in turn the collected rainfall might not be smoothly flowing downward to the gravel pit. The bed width of open ditches is from 2m to 5m and 1 to 2 slopes. According to the layout drawing given by NAC, the existing open ditches are located within the runway strip. Within the runway strip, transverse slopes including drainage facilities should not exceed 2.5 % where the code number 3 or 4 (Nadzab Airport is 4) in accordance with ICAO annex 14, hence, the existing open ditches might be regarded as infringement of ICAO recommendation.

There are two pipe culvert systems located in front of the existing passenger terminal building with several manholes collecting rainwater from the roof of existing passenger terminal and parking lots for registered vehicles. The collected rainwater flows to the east to existing excavated open ditch, and then the rainwater is discharged to connecting open ditch along to the parallel taxiway. At the existing car park located across the circulation road, there is pipe culvert system with drainage manholes at southern border of the car park. The collected rainwater flows to the east to the excavated existing open ditch.

5) Perimeter Road and Fence

Following pictures show that existing perimeter road and fence. The existing perimeter road and fence are not properly maintained, and it should be necessary to improve the facilities.

Photo of Open Ditch

Existing Perimeter Fence


5-30

6) Obstacle Limitation Surfaces

Runway approach category of existing Nadzab airport is Non-precision instrument approach. 2,560m x 150m of runway strip is set. In accordance with ICAO Annex 14, following obstacle limitation surfaces shall be established for Non-precision instrument approach runway. Dimension and slopes of obstacle limitation surface for aerodrome reference code of 4C is stipulated as follows.

Conical surface; Inner horizontal surface; Approach surface; and Transitional surfaces

Table 5.3.1-1 Dimension and Slopes of Obstacle Limitation Surfaces

Surface and Dimensions Non-Precision Instrument Approach

Code Number 4C

Conical Slope Height

5% 100m

Inner Approach Height Radius

45m 4,000m

Approach Length of inner edge Distance from threshold Divergence（each side） First section Length Slope Second section Length Slope Horizontal section Length Total length

300m 60m 15% 3,000m 2% 3,600mb 2.5% 8,400mb 15,000m

Transitional Slope

14.3%

b: Variable length

Source: ICAO


5-31

Following figure shows obstacle limitation surfaces in accordance with ICAO.

Figure 5.3.1-3 Obstacle Limitation Surfaces

Source: JICA Survey Team

7) Aircraft Fuel Facility

The aircraft fuel facility at Nadzab Airport is being operated by Interoil Corporation in accordance with a concession contract with NAC. According to Interoil Co., the fuel is being transported from Lae to Nadzab Airport by trailers. The storage capacity of existing tank is 137kl, although the total potential capacity of the aircraft fuel facility as a whole is 270kl equivalent to the current demand for two weeks.

Aircraft Fuel Farm of Interoil Refueling to Aircraft


5-32

5.3.2 Terminal Facilities

1) Passenger Terminal Building

Main terminal building is very much congested not only by the domestic passengers but also by jointly residing air cargo operations. It has been more than forty (40) years since the airport opening, and as a result of aging, deterioration is conspicuous everywhere in the existing building, therefore, it will not be a practical idea to adopt partial extension, renovation or improvement to the over aged structure to meet the requirement of expanded air passenger demand

Photo1 Photo2

With the introduction of large aircraft such as B737-800 in the near future, number of passengers per an airline will drastically increase, and it shall result in the extreme shortage of required facilities at peak time, in size and in number etc. if accommodated in the existing passenger terminal building. Congestion causes serious problem to the service for passenger’s baggage handling etc.

Photo3 Photo4 Currently the passenger’s baggage handling is carried out all by manual delivery, simply by hand to hand only. It is an absolute necessity to introduce partly automated baggage handling system, with the space as required for the future expansion of the terminal (Photos 5, 6).


5-33

Photo5 Photo6

Current floor space is not adequate to introduce international services as the additional services such as immigration and customs inspection are required. As all of the existing terminal building has defective points in protective measures against fire, the existing building has many problems to solve as a public service facility. For instance, as shown photo 7 below, alarm panel exists, but this panel is out of service due to non-availability of alarm system.

Photo7 Photo8 Airline companies are facing space problem, as designated space for each of their office is not enough at all.


5-34

Utilities for the passenger service are all over-aged, it is strongly recommended to renovate the toilets introducing up-dated universal design to meet the standards of international airport, such as to provide nursery, handicapped units, etc.

Photo9 Photo10


5-35

2) Cargo Terminal (inside PTB)

As the current air cargo is not so great in quantity, the facility in the passenger terminal building seems to be enough in capacity to handle. But at present, as seen in the photos below, the cargo working line of flow is congested with the passenger transportation space, due to the location of cargo space. Cargo service is separately and solely carried out by two airliners, Air Niugini and Airlines PNG, at both end sides of passenger terminal building. As either cargo operation has no truck-yard, therefrom using the main front of the passenger terminal causing risk to the passenger transportation. It is recommended to isolate cargo space from the passenger area to protect both services from the confrontation. Similar congestion exists at Airside as well. Departing cargo operation confronts against arriving cargo service.

Photo11 Photo12

Photo13 Photo14


5-36

3) Control Tower

Deterioration appears at some parts or elements such as flaking ceiling boards in control room, peeling finish material, due to over-age. Meanwhile, serious deterioration or damage to the basic structure is not recognized, hence it is recommended to furbish finish works or parts utilizing the existing structure.

Photo15 Photo16 Control tower is located nearby, and at about the central point of alongside of the runway. The positioning meets an ideal of that of air traffic control room, nevertheless, height may not be enough to view entire operation of aircraft. Visibility to the runway and taxiways as well as approaching/departing aircraft should be verified based on the topographic survey data. Wireless communication system among the other facilities is not established at all, and it will be an essence to provide with the system and infrastructure for wireless communication among such facilities as NAC office, main terminal building, firefighting station, etc.

Photo17 Photo18


5-37

4) Rescue and Firefighting Station

The height of watch room is not enough to ensure line of sight to the entire runway, and western view is entirely blocked by the wall, as a result, visibility is far less as firefighting command center.

Photo19 Photo20

Front entrance of the standby area for fire-engines is not facing towards the runway. It takes much time consumption in case of emergency.

Photo21 Photo22

Water tank for firefighting unit is not provided, and water pressure at the supply point to fire- engine is so weak, that, it takes too much time to fill up fire engine tank.

Photo23 Photo24


5-38

5) NAC Administration Building

At present, existing facility is sufficient in its floor space, for residing about forty (40) staffs. Yet, local NAC office submitted to the HQ with request to increase the staffs to fifty (50). Due to overage the deterioration is severe and conspicuous at everywhere through the entire building. At many part of hall way floors, sinking spot are being appeared. There are no provisions or systems to monitor and control other facilities including the main terminal building.

Photo25

6) Utilities

a) Tap Water Supply

Artesian water wells are the source of all tap water for Nadzab Airport. Originally there were two (2) deep wells at about 1km away from the passenger terminal. Two pumps for each had been utilized to pump-up water, but due to an accident during the course of normal maintenance, a pump dropped into the deep well, which was only 150mm in diameter, and the pump could not be lifted-up any more. Hence, only one (1) deep well has been utilized until now. At present, due to aging and direct sunbeam, control panel has not been regularly functioning, and therefore manual operation is a must now. The water tank, that has about 23m3 in its stock capacity, is elevated about 14m in height by steel frames. It is also over-aged and has continuous water leakage. The water tank is located far from the terminal facilities and due to loss of water head, water pressure at the usage point is not enough at all. Adequate capacity of the tap water with supply pressure shall be ensured.


5-39

Photo26 Photo27

At present, the water for fire-fighting is being supplied from a water tank (400m3-capacity). The water tank receives the source water from the elevated water tank, and the water is pressurized by a pump to supply to fire-fighting facilities or utilities. As it is operated manually without connection with fire alarm system, in case of fire, maintenance crew must come to the pump room to start pressurizing the fire-fighting water. As fire-fighting water supply piping is one way, water pressure at the farthest, fire-fighting station, is very low and it takes more than an hour to store water as required.

Photo28

b) Sewage Water

Currently each building has own preliminary septic tank for decomposition and sedimentation, but basically relying on natural seepage into underground.

c) Diesel-engine Generator House

Like the other facilities, this house is also over- aged. It is observed that ventilation is not effective anymore because fresh air supply is not activated as supply grills are filled with dusts. Based on the evaluation of the existing facility as a whole, it is considered necessary that the whole facility should be relocated to immediate vicinity of the other facilities.


5-40

Photo29 Photo30


5-41

AP

RO

N 4

20

m x

85

m

TW

Y 'J

'

TWY 'K'

TW

Y 'G

'

Electrical Power Supply

Legend

Water Supply

(Excavation)

Electrical Power Supply(Elevated cabling)

Figure 5.3.2-1 Layout of Existing Utilities


5-42

7) Circulation Road and Car Park

There are two (2) existing car parks in front of the passenger terminal building. One, say car park-1, is located between curb side and circulation road with about 35 parking spaces for registered vehicles, and the other (car park-2) is located across the circulation road with approx. 10,000 m2 (146-m wide and 67-m deep) areas with originally 453 parking spaces. Car park-2 is equipped with three high tall street lights; however, two of them are not functioning at the moment, and there exists no road marking, parking spaces on the pavement surface.

Pavement of the car park-1 was of prime and single seal simple asphalt pavement with 25 to 30 cm thickness in total according to relevant drawing, however, the simple asphalt pavement is already lost, and base course originally beneath the asphalt sealed layer has appeared to the surface. There are so many holes and pots anywhere around the curbside road. When passenger vehicle approaches to the curbside, a cloud of sand is get floated in the curbside area. Pavement of the carpark-2 is also made of prime and single sealed simple asphalt concrete pavement with 25 cm thickness in total, however, there provides no maintenance for long time, causing severe damages of existing asphalt pavement. There are a lot of pots and holes at any location and the surface of asphalt pavement has severely damaged or already worn out their life.

The circulation road and car park should be redeveloped along with the new passenger terminal building.

8) Access Road

Access road consists of one lane each for both directions with approx. 3.4 m width. The typical cross section is center crown shape. The access road connects the highland highway with the Nadzab Airport, and its length is approx. 2.5 km. Most of the access road does not equip drainage facilities, and rainwater goes to the edge of the access road naturally. However, access road near the Nadzab Airport has L shaped gutter with drainage manholes. Asphalt sealing was conducted in 2012 at access road. The surface of the access road is relatively good


5-43

condition at this time. Centerline, edge line and street lights are also provided along the access road.

The access road pavement will need to be improved and storm water drainage facilities should be provided.

5.3.3 CNS/ATM and AGL

1) CNS/ATM System

Doppler VOR/DME, installed in 2011on the extended runway center line to the west of RWY 09 threshold, is the only available radio navigational aids at Nadzab Airport. In the existing control tower, VHF communication facility and a weather observation and reporting system are provided.

These facility and equipment are operated and maintained by PNG Air Services Limited (PNGASL). PNGASL is implementing its Strategic Development Plan 2011-2015, and installation of VCS and refurbishment of HF, etc. are included in the project scope. However, PNGASL is still seeking funding for refurbishment of the control tower at Nadzab Airport. See item 2) of Subsection 2.1.5.

2) Aeronautical Ground Lighting

At Nadzab Airport, basic AGL facilities are installed and operated/maintained by NAC. Table 5.3-2 below summarizes the existing conditions of AGL at Nadzab Airport.

Although PAPI, the aeronautical beacon and CCR were relatively newly installed, majority of the runway lights procured in 1975 have already outdated and need to be replaced under the Project. Currently no taxiway edge light has been installed but there exists one set of taxiway centerline light on connection taxiway procured in 1975. Taxiway edge lights should be properly installed under the Project in order to ensure safe and efficient aircraft operations during the night and under low visibility conditions.

Currently no approach light is installed at Nadzab Airport. Although the visibility conditions at Nadzab are quite good, installation of Simple Approach Lighting System (SALS) is considered preferable as one of visual guidance to the pilots just before touch down the runway.

In addition to the replacement/addition of the lighting facilities, power supply cables will need to be additionally placed or renewed.


5-44

Table 5.3-2 Existing Conditions of AGL at Nadzab Airport

AGL Equipment No. Locations Manufacturers Years of Procurement Remarks

PAPI (RWY 09 side) 1 set About 300m inside from RWY 09 threshold ADB

2010 Red/White

PAPI (RWY 27 side) 1 set About 300m inside from RWY 27 threshold ADB Red/White

Runway Edge Lights (Elevated Type) 1set RWY shoulders GEC

1975

Yellow/White

Runway Edge Light (Inset Type) 1 set Turn pads BBT Yellow/White

Runway Threshold Lights (Elevated type: RWY 09 side） 4 RWY 09 end GEC Green

Runway Threshold Lights (Inset type: RWY 09 side) 6 RWY 09 end BBT Green

Runway End Lights (Inset type: 09 side) 6 RWY 09 end BBT Red

Runway Threshold Identification Lights 2 RWY 09 end Australia White

Runway Threshold Lights (Elevated type: RWY 27 side) 4 RWY 27 end GEC Red

Runway Threshold Lights (Inset type: RWY 27 side) 6 RWY 27 end BBT Green

Runway End Lights (Inset type: RWY 27 side) 6 RWY 27 end BBT Red

Turn Pad Edge Lights 1 set Shoulders for turn pad GEC Blue

Taxiway Center Line Lights 1 set Taxiway center line BBT Green

Apron Floodlights 4 Aircraft parking apron Australia White

Wind Direction Indicator Lights 3 sets Along RWY Australia White

Aeronautical Beacon 1 set On top of control tower ADB 2011 Green/Yellow

Current Circuit Regulator (CCR) 2 sets Electrical substation ADB 2010 -

Control panel for Runway Edge Lights & Taxiway Center Line Lights

1 set Electrical substation Local 1975 -

AGL Interface Panel 1 set Electrical substation SIEMENS 2010 - AGL Control Panel 1 set Control Tower VFR room Local 1975 -


5-45

5.3.4 Erap River Flooding

Erap River, running to the west of Nadzab Airport, flows from the north to the south until merging together with Markham River to the south of the Airport. According to information provided by NAC, Erap River changed its course due to manmade diversion by heavy floods on October 29, 2014, which created several new water channels. Erap River flowed into lower area heading toward the runway 09 (western side) but was scattered and diverted away by the existing old embankment near VOR/DME. Some part of the water flow ran onto the existing perimeter road, threatening the runway and taxiways. Fortunately the runway and taxiways and other major airport facilities did not suffer from the flooding this time but the existing embankment is old and deteriorated and should be improved to avoid risk of flooding at Nadzab Airport. It is considered imperative to improve the embankment system so that Nadzab Airport will be able to play its important role in future.

Photograph 1: Aerial View of Erap River flowing towards Runway (Taken on the 4th of November, 2014)

Runway 09

Perimeter Road

Erap

River

Old Embankment

Perimeter Road

New Water Channel

Flow Direction

DVOR/DME

Water Channel Flow Direction


5-46

Photograph 2: Flooded Water from Erap River and Existing Old Embankment

Flooded Water

from Erap River

Existing Old Embankment


5-47

5.4 Optional Rehabilitation Measures of Major Project Components

In order to achieve the project targets, rehabilitation of the airport facilities at Nadzab/Lae Airport should be implemented. The targets discussed in Subsection 5.1 above are: Upgrading to the Second International Airport (design aircraft: B737-800); Upgrading to the Second Busiest Domestic Airport (design aircraft: B737-800); and Upgrading to an Alternate Airport for Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport (design

aircraft: B777-200).

Above-mentioned upgrading needs to be completed by the target opening day of 2021 with adequate capacity to accommodate the forecast airport traffic of the target year 2026 (2031 for the passenger terminal building floor space only). In achieving the targets, there could be some optional ways to rehabilitate the facilities. With regard to the ground maneuvering of diverted B777-200 for example, a minimum required system could consist of an aircraft turn pads on the runway (or taxiway turnarounds), a connection taxiway and a parking stand on the apron as the expected frequency would be very low and widening of the parallel taxiway from 15m to 23m could be regarded as overinvestment to accommodate a few B777-200 diversions a year.

In addition, in order to maintain safe and efficient airport operations, appropriate measure should be taken to prevent the Erap River flooding problem.

These optional measures in achieving the targets are discussed hereunder.

5.4.1 Runway

1) Runway Length

a) Examination of Range-Payload for B737 and B767-300/B777-200/B787-8

For the purpose of verifying necessity of runway extension at Nadzab/Lae Airport, the range-payloads of candidate design aircraft available on the existing runway length has been examined based on the Boeing “Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning” as well as the following assumptions: Aircraft types to be examined; B737-700 & 800, B767-300ER, B777-200, B787-8. Current runway length; 2438m. Elevation; 70m. Temperature; 35 degree Celsius. Longitudinal slope; 0.3% down eastward. Weight of a passenger including baggage; 100kg.

To determine the basic runway length, corrections need to be undertaken using the environmental factors at Nadzab Airport based on the methodology stipulated in ICAO


5-48

Aerodrome Design Manual Part 1: Runways.

The runway length should firstly be corrected at the rate of 7% per 300 m elevation.

The runway length should also be corrected at the rate of 1% for every 1℃ by which the Nadzab Airport temperature exceeds the temperature in the standard atmosphere for the Nadzab Airport elevation.

Standard atmosphere values are shown as follows.

Altitude (m) Temperature (℃)

0 15.00

500 11.75

71 14.538

The runway length should further be corrected at the rate of 10% for each 1 % of the runway slope.

The runway length of 2438m has been corrected in terms of the elevation, temperature and longitudinal slope as shown in Table 5.4.1-1.

Table 5.4.1-1 Correction of Runway Length

Factors Parameters Rate of Correction Correction Corrected RWY

Length (m)

Existing - - - 2,438

a. Elevation 70m 7% per 300m 1.016 2,400

b. Temperature 35℃ 1% for every 1℃ 1.205 1,992

c. Slope 0.3% 10% for each 1% of the RWY slope 1.030 1,934


According to the Airplane Characteristics published by Boeing, the corrected runway length of 1934m allows approximate operational take-off weights of the aircraft as follows:

B737-700; 64,000kg. B737-800; 73,000kg. B767-300ER; 155,00kg. B787-8; 191,000kg; B777-200; 226,000kg.

The Operating Empty Weights (OEW) plus payloads of the aircraft are as shown in Table 5.4.1-2.


5-49

Table 5.4.1-2 Assumed Operating Empty Weight plus Payload

Aircraft

OEW plus Payload (kg: Mixed Class)

Full Pax Half Cargo

Full Pax only 80% Pax Half

Cargo 80% Pax only

B737-700 (CFM56-7B20/7B-22/-7B24)

52,553 50,448 49,993 47,888

B737-800 (CFM56-7B24/7B-26/-7B27)

59,551 57,413 56,351 54,213

B767-300ER (CF6-80C2-B4, PW4056, etc.)

122,900 112,000 118,500 107,600

B787-8 (typical engines)

151,512 141,998 146,672 137,158

B777-200 (General Electric)

179,560 168,650 173,000 162,090

Note. Weight per passenger was assumed to be 100kg including baggage.

The combinations of the operational take-off weights and the OEW plus payloads as well as the aircraft performance charts contained in the Airplane Characteristics give us the ranges available as shown in Table 5.4.1-3 below.

Table 5.4.1-3 Result of Range-Payload Examination

Aircraft

Range (Nautical Miles)

Full Pax and Half Cargo

Full Pax only 80% Pax and Half Cargo

80% Pax only

B737-700 1,500 2,000 2,100 2,600

B737-800 1,800 2,200 2,400 2,800

B767-300ER 2,500 4,000 3,000 4,300

B787-8 3,400 4,500 3,900 5,100

B777-200 2,700 3,600 3,300 4,200


The results described above imply that the existing runway length of Nadzab/Lae Airport is in principle adequate to accommodate short to medium-haul operations of the candidate design aircraft, including between Nadzab/Lae and Cairns (710NM) as well as Brisbane (1128NM), although the runway needs to be widened and reinforced to accommodate such operations.

In case of B777-200 with a payload of full passengers and half cargo, the range would cover Tokyo, Hong Kong and Singapore. However, the obstacle assessment in case of one-engine


5-50

failure should be carried out in close cooperation with Air Niugini in order to assess based on the operating data and specifications of the aircraft.

b) Departure Procedure in Case of Engine Failure

In addition to the examination of range payload requirement, Air Niugini explained that, for operation of a twin engine aircraft, “taking-off with one-engine failure and returning to the airport” procedure and allowable take-off weight thereof should be scrutinized.

According to Air Niugini, Nadzab Airport is surrounded by high mountain ranges in all directions in nature. In case one engine failure occurs for departing aircraft, the departing aircraft shall clear from the high mountain ranges in one engine operation. For Boeing 737 type of aircraft, the existing runway length is not sufficient to take off at an optimum take-off speed in order to clear the high mountain range; in turn weight limiting operation should be adopted. If the runway is extended to 2650 m, such limitation does not need to be imposed to departing aircraft.

Air Niugini concluded that the existing runway length is sufficient for the range of 1200 NM or within four hours by Boeing 737-700/800 such as Cairns and Brisbane, and the maximum payload will not be adversely affected (as per e-mail message from Air Niugini to NAC dated 1 July 2014).

Furthermore, Air Niugini mentioned that diverted aircraft such as Boeing 767 from/to Jackson’s international airport can be operated with the existing runway length at Nadzab Airport.

c) Conclusion

In summary the runway length requirement should be examined from following three viewpoints:

i) Allowable range-payload for the design aircraft; ii) Allowable take-off speed for one engine failure departure; and

iii) Required runway length for diverted aircraft.

The existing runway length of 2438m allows adequate payload for the short to medium haul international operations for B737 (and also B777/B787). The existing runway length also allows the take-off weight and speed of B737 which should enable no payload limitation up to the destinations within flight time of four hours. Therefore, the existing runway length is adequate to meet the target of upgrading Nadzab to the second international airport capable of accommodating B737-700/800 with operational take-off weight to Brisbane. The existing runway length is adequate to accommodate diverted B777 and B787 from Jacksons/Port Moresby International Airport.


5-51

In conclusion, the runway at Nadzab/Lae Airport does not need to be extended to meet the targets of the Project.

d) Possibility of Future Extension

In future when commencement of any long-haul international operations is justified, the runway may need to be extended to ensure adequate range-payload of operating aircraft. The runway length requirement should be examined based on the anticipated destination and the aircraft performance data.

The runway extension can be made physically within the existing airport boundary, requiring neither land acquisition nor involuntary resettlement of residents. There is no manmade structure in immediate vicinity of both runway ends. The topography around the runway is generally flat. From flood protection viewpoint, extension to the east is considered desirable. However, Nadzab Airport is surrounded by the mountain ranges. When determining the runway extension, detailed examination on the aircraft operational procedures such as one-engine failure operation should be carried out in close cooperation with operating airlines based on their aircraft performance data.


5-52

2) Runway Width

The runway width for Code 4C and 4E airport should be 45m in accordance with ICAO Annex 14 as shown in Table 5.4.1-4, and the runway should be widened from current 30m to 45m.

Table 5.4.1-4 Runway Width Requirement

Code No

Code Letter

A B C D E F

1 18 m 18 m 23 m - - -

2 23 m 23 m 30 m - - -

3 30 m 30 m 30 m 45 m - -

4 - - 45 m 45 m 45 m 60 m

Source: ICAO Annex 14

3) Runway Pavement Strength

The existing runway pavement was designed and constructed to accommodate F28 class aircraft, and therefore needs to be strengthened. As the runway needs to be kept operational while its pavement is being strengthened, structural overlay of asphalt concrete should be employed.

4) Runway Shoulders

ICAO Annex 14 recommends “Runway shoulders should be provided for a runway where the code letter is D or E, and the runway width is less than 60m”. The runway at Nadzab will be widened from current 30m to 45m which will accommodate Code C aircraft on regular basis and Code D or Code E aircraft on occasional basis. To accommodate Code C aircraft, ICAO ANNEX 14 recommendations do not include provision of the runway shoulder.*1 (*1 Reference:

US FAA design standards for aircraft group III including B737 stipulate runway width 30m with 6-m wide

shoulder on both sides.) On the other hand, if the requirement for Code D and Code E aircraft is applicable, 7.5-m shoulder on both sides of the 45-m wide runway should be provided in accordance with ICAO Annex 14 recommendation. As the frequency of Code D/E aircraft operation is very limited, provision of the shoulders to the runway has not been considered as required. With regard to the aircraft ground maneuvering, clearance/separation distance requirements applicable to Code E aircraft has been used in the facility planning as applicable, as safe ground maneuvering of B777-200/787-8 (inclusive of B767) needs to be safeguarded even though such operation is occasional. In addition, Dash8-Q400 operated by Air Niugini is classified on ICAO code 3D, however, Air Niugini has a plan to replace Dash8-Q400 to F70, and is schedule for receiving the first F70 in February 2015. Therefore, requirement relevant to code 3D has not been taken into consideration.


5-53

5) Runway Turn Pad

In case the parallel taxiway is not upgraded due to any reason, provision of a turn pad for B767/B777/B787 as an alternative measure should be considered to facilitate a 180-degree turn of the design aircraft at the runway ends. Figures 5.4.1-1 shows required dimensions of the turn pads on 45-m wide runway for B777-200.

Figure 5.4.1-1 Dimension of Turn Pad for B777-200 (Runway Width of 45m) Source: JICA Survey Team

6) Runway Occupancy Time

Runway occupancy time under B737-800 operation condition has been examined. Following assumptions are considered for landing.

Landing mass is set to 85% of max. design landing weight Occupancy time for B737-800 from landing to stoppage is set to 1.2 minute (72 seconds) based

on examination for other airport Time for turning is set to15 seconds Taxing speed on the runway after turning is set to 30km/h (8.3m/s)

66,361 kg of maximum design landing weight for B737-800 is obtained, and therefore, landing mass is set to 56,410 kg. A landing field length for B737-800 has been illustrated following chart made by manufacturer.

71.9

8

74.7046.73

45.0

0


5-54

Figure 5.4.1-2 Landing Field Length for B737-800 (Source: Boeing)

Necessary landing field lengths for B737-800 are summarized as follows.

Dry Runway Condition 1,530m Wet Runway Condition 1,760m

Correction coefficient has been obtained 1.016 based on correction rate by elevation. Correction rate of the elevation should be at 7% per 300 m, and the elevation of Nadzab airport is 70m. Necessary landing field lengths after correction by the elevation are as follows. Dry Runway Condition 1,530m x 1.016 = 1,560m Wet Runway Condition 1,760m x 1.016 = 1,790m

56.4

1.53

1.76


5-55

Following figure shows that the distance between the runway threshold 09/ 27 to TW-B/ TW-C. When aircraft is landing from 09 runway side, it might be difficult to use the TW-B and TW-C directly for dry and wet runway conditions, because the TW-B and TW-C are located 1,069 m and 1,479m from the end of the runway 09 respectively. It is the same situation for runway 27 side.

Figure 5.4.1-3 Locations of TW-B and TW-C from Runway Thresholds

After touching down and safely stopped, B737-800 heads for the loading apron using stub taxiway. Considering the turning characteristics of B737-800 and 45m width of runway, B737-800 would be 180 turn somewhere on the runway not using turn pad at the end of runway. Following figure illustrates the image of 180 turn on the runway and head to the loading apron.

Figure 5.4.1-4 Image of Aircraft Landing from Runway 09 Assumed runway occupancy times for landing from runway 09/27 are summarized as follows.

Landing from Runway 09 DRY Condition

Time until safely stop (1,560m from threshold) 72 seconds Time for turn on the runway 15 seconds Time to reach TW-C after turn 10 seconds

SALSSALS

GSEpark

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

23.0

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

20.0

0

23.0

45.0

0

72.0

45.0

0

74.746.8

72.0

74.7 46.8

TW-A(1)TW-A(3)

TW-A(4)

TW

-C TW

-D

TW

-B

TW-A(2)

33.50

101.5

0

64.0

02

6.0

0

11.5

0

23.0

23.0

New TW

APRON 420m x 85m

330.00 88.00

SALSSALS

GSEpark

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

23.0

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

20.0

0

23.0

45.0

0

72.0

45.0

0

74.746.8

72.0

74.7 46.8

TW-A(1)TW-A(3)

TW-A(4)

TW

-C TW

-D

TW

-B

TW-A(2)

33.50

101.5

0

64.0

026.0

0

11.5

0

23.0

23.0

New TW

APRON 420m x 85m

330.00 88.00

180 turn on the

runway after landing


5-56

Total 97 seconds Landing from Runway 09 WET Condition

Time until safely stop (1,790m from threshold) 83 seconds Time for turn on the runway 15 seconds Time to reach TW-C after turn 38 seconds Total 136 seconds

Landing from Runway 27 DRY Condition

Time until safely stop (1,560m from threshold) 72 seconds Time for turn on the runway 15 seconds Time to reach TW-B after turn 23 seconds Total 110 seconds

Landing from Runway 27WET Condition

Time until safely stop (1,790m from threshold) 83 seconds Time for turn on the runway 15 seconds Time to reach TW-B after turn 51 seconds Total 149 seconds

Runway occupancy time under B737-800 operation condition has been examined. Following assumptions are considered for taking-off.

Time of departure from the end of runway after turning is set to 1.3 minutes (78 seconds) based on examination for other airport

Taxing speed from TW-B/TW-C to the end of runway is set to 30km/h (8.3m/s) Time for turning is set to15 seconds TW-B is used for taking-off of runway 09, and TW-C for runway 27

Taking into consideration of above prerequisites, assumed runway occupancy times for taking-off from runway 09/27 are summarized as follows and the image of taking-off aircraft are shown in below. Taking-off from Runway 09

Time from TW-B to the end of runway 09 115 seconds Time for turn on Turn Pad 15 seconds Time until departure 78 seconds Total 208 seconds (3 minutes 28 seconds)


5-57

Taking-off from Runway 27 Time from TW-C to the end of runway 27 101 seconds Time for turn on Turn Pad 15 seconds Time until departure 78 seconds Total 194 seconds (3 minutes 14 seconds)

Figure 5.4.1-5 Image of Aircraft Taking-off from Runway 09

7) Runway End Safety Area

In accordance with ICAO Annex 14, 240-m long 90-m wide runway end safety area will be provided at both ends of the runway.

8) Stopway

At both ends of the runway, 60-m long 45-m wide stopways will be provided.

SALSSALS

GSEpark

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

23.0

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

20.0

0

23.0

45.0

0

72.0

45.0

0

74.746.8

72.0

74.7 46.8

TW-A(1)TW-A(3)

TW-A(4)

TW

-C TW

-D

TW

-B

TW-A(2)

33.50

101

.50

64.0

02

6.0

0

11.5

0

23.0

23.0

New TW

APRON 420m x 85m

330.00 88.00

Departure, after

180 turn

To RW 09 from

TW-B


5-58

9) Optional Runway Rehabilitation Measures

Table 5.4.1-5 lists runway rehabilitation measures. The runway should be widened to 45m and strengthened to accommodate B737. Occasional operations of diverted B767/B777/B787 may be accommodated after pavement strengthening to B737. Two sets of turn pad for B777-200 should be provided at both runway ends to allow 180-degree turn as widening of the parallel taxiway to 23m to accommodate occasional operation of B777-200 is not justifiable.

Table 5.4.1-5 Runway Rehabilitation Measures Items Measures Remarks

Runway Length As is. Not required to achieve the targets.

Runway Width To be widened from 30m to 45m. To ensure safety for Code 4C and larger

aircraft.

Pavement Strength To be reinforced for B737-800 by

asphalt overlay.

Occasional diversion of

B767/B777/B787 may be accepted as

overload operations.

Runway Shoulders Not provided.

Shoulders are not required for B737.

Frequency of B767/B777/B787

operations is very much limited.

Turn Pad for B777-200 To be provided.

Widening the parallel taxiway to 23m to

cater for B767/B777/B787 is considered

not justifiable.

Runway End Safety

Areas and Stopways To be provided.


5-59

5.4.2 Taxiways

1) Taxiway Width

Required widths of the straight portion of taxiways are as follows: For B737-800 (Code 4C, wheel base 15.6m); 15m. For B767/B777/B787; 23m.

The width of existing taxiways is 15m, and widening thereof is not required to accommodate B737-800. Taxiways accommodating B767/B777/B787 should be 23-m wide.

Table 5.4.2-1 Taxiway Width Requirement

Physical Characteristics

Code Letter

A B C D E F

Min. Width of Taxiway Pavement

7.5 m 10.5 m 18 ma 15 mb

23 m 18 m

23 m 25 m

Taxiway Pavement and Shoulder

- - 25 m 38 m 44 m 60 m

a: Taxiway intended to be used by aircraft with a wheel base equal to or greater than 18 m. b: Taxiway intended to be used by aircraft with a wheel base less than 18 m.

2) Taxiway Fillet

The existing taxiway fillets (curved portions) have been tested as to whether their dimensions are appropriate to accommodate B737-800. The minimum clearance distance of outer main wheel to taxiway edge is shown in Table 5.4.2-2 below.

Table 5.4.2-2 Minimum Clearance Distance of Outer Main Wheel to Taxiway Edge

Code A B C D E F

Min. clearance distance of outer main wheel to taxiway edge

1.5m 2.25m 4.5ma 3mb

4.5m 4.5m 4.5m

a: Taxiway intended to be used by aircraft with a wheel base equal to or greater than 18 m. b: Taxiway intended to be used by aircraft with a wheel base less than 18 m. Source: ICAO Annex 14

It has been confirmed that the existing taxiway fillet is able to accommodate Boeing 737-800 without further widening for the end stub taxiways A and D, stub taxiways B and C. In case the parallel taxiway needs to accommodate B777-200, the fillets should be widened accordingly.


5-60

Figure 5.4.2-1 Examination of Taxiways “B” and “C” Fillet for Boeing 737-800 based on Existing Fillet Dimension

3) Taxiway Pavement Strengthening and Rehabilitation

The existing taxiway pavement was constructed to accommodate F28 class aircraft. The pavement of taxiways which will accommodate B737 needs to be strengthened by structural overlay of asphalt concrete.

For taxiways accommodating F100 and lighter aircraft also in future, the pavement does not need to be structurally strengthened. However such taxiway pavement needs to be rehabilitated as the previous overlay was conducted in 2001 while the design life of asphalt pavement is normally 10 to 20 years and the opening day is expected to be 2021 (20 years after the previous overlay).

4) Taxiway Shoulder

Provision of the treated surface shoulders (5-m wide) where taxiway width remains 15m is recommended, while shoulders will not be provided to the taxiways to be widened to 23m as the B767/B777/B787 engines remain above the taxiway pavement and veering off the taxiways of diverted B767/B777/B787 is considered unlikely.

R41.5

R38.1

0,0,0


5-61

5) Optional Taxiway Rehabilitation Measures

Figure 5.4.2-2 shows the locations of Taxiways and Table 5.4.2-3 lists optional taxiway rehabilitation measures. Widening to 23m and pavement reinforcement of the stub taxiway B connecting the runway and the parallel taxiway A, a part of the parallel taxiway A (A2) as well as the taxiway C to accommodate B767/B777/B787 is the minimum requirement to achieve the Project targets. It is considered desirable to provide two entry/exit taxiways for B737 parked on the new apron. Therefore construction of a new taxiway next to the existing taxiway C is recommended. A part of the existing parallel taxiway between taxiway C and the new one should also be widened and strengthened. For the other part of the parallel taxiway A and taxiway D (excluding the widened portion), a minimum asphalt overlay is at least required for rehabilitation purpose while reinforcement of the entire parallel taxiway A and D for B737-800 is considered preferable for safe and efficient aircraft operations. Widening of the parallel taxiway to 23m to cater for diverted B767/B777/B787 is considered overinvestment. Treated surface shoulders (5-m wide) should be provided to 15-m wide taxiways while no shoulder would be required for 23-m wide taxiways.

Figure 5.4.2-2 Locations of Taxiways

GSEpark

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

23.0

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

23.0

TW-A(1)TW-A(3)

TW-A(4)

TW

-C

TW

-D

TW

-B TW-A(2)

23.0

23.0

New TW


5-62

Table 5.4.2-3 Taxiway Rehabilitation Measures Items Measures Remarks

i) Stub TWY C

Width To be widened from 15m to 23m.

Minimum required achieving the targets to

accommodate scheduled B737 operations and to

be an international alternate airport.

Pavement Strength To be reinforced for B737-800.

Ditto.

Occasional diversion of B767/B777/B787 may

be accepted as overload operations.

ii) Stub TWY B from RWY to P-TWY A

Width To be widened to 23m.





Ditto.



iii) Rest of Stub TWY B

Width As is.

Pavement Strength To be rehabilitated by asphalt overlay.

iv) New Stub TWY for

New Apron

Provision of new taxiway between

the new apron and the parallel

taxiway.

For smooth taxiing of B767/B777/B787.

v) Part of P-TWY between TWY B and New Stub TWY

Width To be widened to 23m.





Ditto.



vi) Rest of P-TWY A & TWY D

Width As is. Occasional diversion of B767/B777/B787 may

be accommodated by the runway turn pads and


5-63

Items Measures Remarks

widened stub taxiway C.

Pavement Strength

To be rehabilitated by asphalt overlay (Option 1) or to be reinforced for B737-800 (Option 2).

vii) TWY Shoulders

Construction of 5-m wide shoulders

(treated surface) along 15-m wide

taxiways has been proposed.

No shoulder has been proposed for

23-m wide taxiway.

Note. TWY: Taxiway, P-TWY: Parallel Taxiway, RWY: Runway


5-64

5.4.3 Aircraft Parking Apron

Future aircraft parking stand requirements are as follows:

B737; 3 Propeller; 6 Total; 9

1) Existing Apron

Currently there are six aircraft parking stands consisting of one for B737 and the others for up to Dash 8. The size of existing apron is 418 m in width and 85 m in depth. Aircraft to be parked on the existing apron enter and leave the aircraft stands by its own power. Angled nose-in parking configuration has been adopted. Meanwhile Japanese Civil Aviation Bureau’s (JCAB) design manual stipulates that space requirement for self-maneuver of propeller aircraft is 55 m in width and 70 m in depth, when parked in angled nose-out parking configuration. As six (6) parking stands for 70-seater and smaller propeller aircraft are required from demand forecast analysis and above required width, the existing apron width required for handling propeller aircraft is 330 m (6 times 55-m width), and the rest of the existing apron space may be utilized by B737 type of aircraft. The existing apron for six 70-seater aircraft parking stands (330-m wide) should be rehabilitated by single layer asphalt overlay. The other part of the existing apron (418m-330m=88m) may be utilized as parking stands for B737.

2) New Apron

Space requirement for the new apron has been examined. As partial one-and-half story passenger terminal building was chosen, B737-800 and diverted B767/B777/B787 would follow taxi-in/push out parking method.

As required width of taxi-in/push out stand for B737-800 is 40.5m, a total width of 121.5m (40.5m per each, 3 stands in total) is required, of which 88m is of the existing apron after pavement strengthening and 33.5m is of new cement concrete apron.

In order to allow simultaneous operation of B737-800 on the apron and B777-200 on the taxiway and vice versa, apron depth of 101.5 m is required.


5-65

Three B737 parking configuration

Taxiing-in of B777 while one B737 parked on apron

Taxiing of B737 while B777 parked on apron

Figure 5.4.3-1 Aircraft Parking/Taxiing Configuration on New Apron

GSEpark

R38.10

15.0

0

TW-A(3)

New TW

TW-A(2)

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

121.50330.00

55mx6 spot

nose-in push-out

88.00 33.50

20.0

0

101.5

0

64.0

026.0

0

11.5

0

99.0

040.0

47.5

11.5

GSEpark

R38.10

5.00 23.0

TW-A(3)

New TW

TW-A(2)

121.50330.00

55mx6 spot

nose-in push-out

88.00 33.50

20.0

0

GSEpark

R38.10

15.0

0

TW-A(3)

New TW

TW-A(2)

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

121.50330.00

55mx6 spot

nose-in push-out

88.00 33.50

101.5

0

64.0

026.0

0

11.5

0

20.0

0


5-66

3) Optional Aircraft Parking Apron Rehabilitation/Development Measures

Table 5.4.3-1 Apron Development/Rehabilitation Measures Items Measures Remarks

i) Existing Apron

Dimension

Existing width (418m) to be divided to

those for propeller-driven aircraft

(width: 330m, depth: 85m) and for

B737 (width: 88m, depth to be

increased to 101.5m).

Pavement Strength

For propeller-driven aircraft part:

Asphalt overlay for rehabilitation

purpose.

For B737 part: Strengthening to

B737-800.by asphalt overlay

ii) New Apron

Dimension

Number of parking stands (taxi-in/

push-out ): 3

Width; 33.5m.

Depth; 101.5m.

One of three stands is for reserve.

Pavement Strength

Optional but recommendable.

Design strength to accommodate

B777-200 recommendable.

As future frequency of B777 operations

is not high, the difference between

B737/B777 would be not significant.

Apron Edge Taxiway

Shoulder Not provided.

Risk of veering off the apron pavement

is low.

5.4.4 Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL)

1) Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPI)

The existing two sets of PAPI, renewed in 2010, are in good condition and its replacement is not required under the Project. However, installation of electric power cable has been included in the project scope.

2) Simple Approach Lighting System (SALS)

In order to provide visual guidance to aircraft pilots during the approaches to the runway, installation of Simple Approach Lighting System (SALS) is considered recommendable. RWY 09 approaches account for approximately 70% of the total approaches while RWY 27 approaches are carried out during early morning time when foggy conditions are often occur. Installation of SALS to RWY 09 and RWY 27 is considered preferable.


5-67

3) Runway Edge Lights/Threshold Lights/End Lights/Identification Lights/Turn Pad Lights/Taxiway Lights and Apron Flood Lights

These lighting facilities are outdated and the electric power cables do not meet the minimum insulation resistance of requirement of 2M ohm, requiring complete replacement. However, the runway end identification lights are not required to be replaced as they have not been utilized for more than tens of years since they had broken down and no commercial/housing development exists near Nadzab Airport.

4) Aerodrome Beacon

Aerodrome beacon installed on the top of control tower was renewed in 2011 and is still in good condition. Replacement thereof is not required.

5) Current Circuit Regulator (CCR)

CCR for PAPI was installed in 2010 and still in good condition. However CCR will be transferred to a new power supply substation and the costs of transfer and additional cabling are required.

6) Monitor and Control System

AGL interface panel connecting CCR for PAPI and AGL monitor control panel as well as AGL control panel installed in the VFR room of control tower, installed in 2010, are still in good conditions. On the other hand, monitor and control system panels for the other AGL installed about 40 years ago are operating normally but no more spare parts are available and replacement under the project is required.


5-68

5.4.5 Passenger Terminal Building

With regard to the passenger terminal development, there could be a choice of “single-story concept without passenger boarding bridge (PBB)” or “one-and-half concept with PBB”.

The existing passenger terminal of Nadzab Airport is one (1) story building without passenger boarding bridge. Majority of the airlines at Nadzab are operating relatively small propeller-driven aircraft, and the passengers walk between the aircraft parked on the apron and the terminal gates. This situation will still continue even when the new passenger terminal building is developed and B737-700/800 starts scheduled operations at Nadzab by Air Niugini.

Photo 31 Photo 32

Meetings with NAC and Air Niugini were held and JICA Study Team explained that, although one-and-half story concept offers convenient passenger handling for B737, it is more costly for both NAC and operating airlines and requested their opinion on choice of the terminal concept. As a result, it has been confirmed that both NAC and Air Niugini preferred the one-and-half story concept.

About 80 % of the aircraft operations and 60 % of the domestic passengers at Nadzab in 2031 will be accommodated by 70-seater and smaller class aircraft. About 40 % of the domestic passengers will be accommodated by B737. In case the one-and-half concept is employed and security check and departure lounge, etc. are only provided on the second level due to economical reason, majority of the passengers will need to climb up to the second level after check-in to wait for their boarding time and come down to the first level to walk to the aircraft, inconvenient procedure for them. From passenger service viewpoint, the single-story passenger terminal concept is likely to suit the anticipated operational environment over the planning horizon up to 2031. Therefore, single-story concept has been chosen in principle. Additionally for the sake of B737 passenger convenience, it has been proposed that limited passenger handling facilities such as passport control, departure lounge for both domestic and international passengers, arrival concourse and one unit of passenger boarding bridge are to be provided on the second level.


5-69

5.4.6 Cargo Terminal Building

Taking advantage of the current cargo facilities being located at side of the passenger terminal and the closest space to apron, it will be the most beneficial plan to renovate the current passenger terminal for the purpose of cargo service, as soon as the new passenger terminal building is in service. At present, amount of belly cargo by airliner at Nadzab Airport more or less 2,000t per year. According to the Air Traffic Demand Forecast, the annual domestic and international air cargo volume will increase to 5,800t in 2026 and 6,900t in 2031 respectively. Extracting from the accumulated performance data in the past, general cargo throughput of a cargo terminal is about 10t/m2. Thus requirement of the size of new cargo building in the year 2026 and 2031 will be about 600m2 and 800m2 in floor space respectively. Should the existing passenger terminal is renovated and switched to be the new cargo terminal building, then the floor space of about 2,500m2 shall be available for handling of air cargo. As the location is along the existing apron, so that it will make good efficiency in surface transportation of air cargo.

5.4.7 Control Tower

At some part of the existing control tower which is more than forty (40) years old, deterioration of the construction materials is conspicuous. Nevertheless, the concrete structure and structural steel of the tower, in general, do not expose any damage or corrosion in its entirety and the existing tower structure may be utilized in future with renovation and remodeling using new finish material and equipment. However, it is considered necessary to evaluate the structural soundness of the tower during the detail design stage taking into account of the risk of earthquake and provide reinforcement measures if necessary. The location of the existing tower is at about the center of longitudinal position along runway, and being the best position in visibility for the air traffic control.

The line of sight from the existing control tower has been examined as described below. The sight lines to the new apron and the edge of runway is assured even with the new PTB and other new buildings as shown in the following check drawing.

When aircraft approaches the runway, controller at the control tower needs to monitor and gives an order to the aircraft. Two story of new passenger terminal building would construct in line of the existing control tower and its highest height of the roof point will reach at 94.5 MSL. Meanwhile control tower’s view eye level is approx. 89.2 MSL, about 5.3 m lower than the highest roof point of new passenger terminal building. Due to the location of the control tower, it is noted that controller at the control tower could be visible of straight-in approaching aircraft, therefore, sight check, whether controller could be visible of circle approaching aircraft, has been conducted using example of circle approaching route for local airport in Japan and shown in the following drawing (Figure 5.4-71). As a result, controller at the control tower could be visible of



A


Guinea N

AC

5-70

circle approaching aircraft.

Figure 5 .4.7-1 Sight line check



A


Guinea N

AC

5-71

Figure 5.4.7-2 Sight check for Circle Approaching A

ircraft


5-72

5.4.8 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station and Fire Fighting Vehicle

Present location of the rescue and fire-fighting station does not provide the visibility of entire runway, taxiway and the main terminal facilities. Furthermore, the emergency communication system is not functioning at all. Therefore it is recommended to newly construct a rescue and fire-fighting station at the east side of the existing location.

Procurement of one unit of a Fire Fighting Vehicle will be required.


5-73

5.4.9 NAC Administration Building

Entire relocation of the administration office is strongly suggested. It is because of age of the existing building, it requires a lot of renovation and remodeling as many, and much area or part, need repair or replacement, resulting un-economical budget. As the existing administration building appears excessively over aged, as deterioration on surface is severely observed, and the structure might be over-due as the floor is, at some part, sinking. The new administration building shall become the core facility of overall control system which covers entire airport facilities in regards to operations as such, as fire prevention, alarm system, public announcement and rescue operation, and in regard to the maintenance for the all airport facilities, systems and the equipment as well.

Provision of the new administration facility and function inside the new passenger terminal building could be an option as the required floor spaces are combined and be economical. However, such provision could restrict flexibility for future terminal expansion and not preferable and hence not adopted.

5.4.10 Utilities

Following utilities need to be provided with sufficient capacities, according to the selected scope of the facility rehabilitation and development and therefore not be regarded as optional:

Potable water supply system; Sewage treatment system; Power supply system; and Gas supply system.

5.4.11 Aircraft Fuel Facilities

Based on the forecast daily and weekly aircraft movements for 2026 and 2031 at Nadzab Airport as well as Airport Facility Planning Manual prepared by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan, future consumptions of aircraft fuel and required tank capacity has been estimated.

Following assumptions were employed:

Route distance from Nadzab Airport for the domestic destinations; 500km. Route distance from Nadzab Airport to Brisbane; 2,500km. Route distance from Nadzab Airport to Cairns; 1,200km. Computation of the fuel consumption for;

B737 class aircraft Y=0.0041X+0.75 Propeller driven aircraft Y=0.0010X+0.60


5-74

Where Y is fuel consumption (kl) and X is route distance (km).

Required tank capacity to be equivalent to the estimated fuel consumption for two weeks.

Table 5.4.11-1 Estimated Aircraft Fuel Consumption and Storage Capacity (2026)

Table 5.4.11-2 Estimated Aircraft Fuel Consumption and Storage Capacity (2031)

ApproximateDistance

Fuel Consumtion perDeparture

(km) (kl)Daily

DeparturesWeekly

Departures

Weekly FuelConsumption

(kl)

Required Fuel TankCapacity for Two

Weeks (kl)

B737-800 500 2.8 3 21 59 118Prop. 500 1.1 24 168 185 370Total - - 27 189 244 488

Brisbane B737-800 2500 11.0 - 1 11 22Cairns Prop. 1200 1.8 - 1 2 4Total - - - 2 13 26

Total - - - - - - 257 514

Destination Aircraft

2026

Domestic

International

All

ApproximateDistance

Fuel Consumtion perDeparture

(km) (kl)Daily

DeparturesWeekly

Departures

Weekly FuelConsumption

(kl)

Required Fuel TankCapacity for Two

Weeks (kl)

B737-800 500 2.8 5 35 98 196Prop. 500 1.1 25 175 193 386Total - - 30 210 291 582

Brisbane B737-800 2500 11.0 - 2 22 44Cairns Prop. 1200 1.8 - 1 2 4Total - - - 3 24 48

Total - - - - - - 315 630

International

Destination Aircraft

2031

Domestic All


5-75

5.4.12 Erap River Flood Protection

Measures to prevent the airport facilities from flooding of Erap River are considered imperative to maintain Nadzab Airport fully operational and to be included in the scope of the Project. Figure 5.4.12-1 shows proposed phased embankment improvement/extension plan for flood prevention. Improvement of the existing embankment (1st phase; 1,300m) and extension of new embankment to both sides (2nd phase-a; 1,140m and 2nd phase-b; 260m) have been proposed to be included in the scope of the Project.

Figure 5.4.12-1: Example Phasing of Embankment Improvement Mapping by JICA Study Team on satellite photograph obtained from the Google Earth


5-76

5.5 Examination of Optional Project Scope

Evaluation of the options has been carried out from following viewpoints:

Level of operational limitations to be imposed on B737 and B767/B777/B787; Level of meeting the project targets; and Urgency of rehabilitation.

Preliminary construction cost estimate has been conducted based on the contract prices of CADIP (mainly Mt. Hagen and Jacksons/Port Moresby), price quotations submitted by local contractors and previous experiences of similar airport projects with adjustment based on the following conditions and assumptions:

Exchange rate; PGK=JPY 48.2 according to preconditions for JICA Fact Finding Mission. Base date; May 2014. Inflation from 2012 to 2014; 10% (approx. 4.0% in 2013 and 6.0% in 2014 according to IMF

Country Report 13/339).

5.5.1 Runway, Taxiways and Apron and Related Facilities

1) Options

With regard to the runway, taxiways and aprons as well as their related facilities, the major project components listed in Subsection 5.4 above have been grouped into following options:

Option 1; Minimum project components required to allow the scheduled international and domestic flights by B737 type aircraft and occasional operations of B767/B777/B787. As the parallel taxiway pavement, except for between the connections with TWY B and the new stub taxiway, will be rehabilitated but not reinforced, B737 and heavier aircraft will normally not be allowed to taxi on the said portion of the parallel taxiway.

Option 2; In addition to the proposed scope of the Option 1, reinforcement of the whole length of the parallel taxiway is to be included in the project scope. No operational limitation for B737 in principle would be imposed, however B767/B777/B787 would not be allowed to taxi on the parallel taxiway.

Table 5.5-1 shows matrix of options for the runway, taxiway, apron and related facilities, followed by the evaluation on two options.


5-77

Table 5.5-1 Matrix showing Options of Runway/Taxiways/Aprons/AGL/Related Facilities

Facility Project Components Option 1 Option 2

1. Runway

Extension - -

Widening to 45m x x

Pavement Strengthening to B737 x x

Shoulders - -

Turn Pad for B777 x x

2. Stub Taxiways B

Widening x x

Pavement Strengthening x x

Shoulders - -

3. Stub Taxiway C

Widening x x


Shoulders - -

4. Parallel Taxiway A(1), A(4) and D A(4) and D

Widening - -

Pavement Rehabilitation x -

Pavement Strengthening to B737 - x

Shoulders x x

5. Parallel Taxiway A(2) and A(3)

Widening x x


Shoulders - -

6. New Stub Taxiway 23-m wide and pavement for B737 x x

7. Existing Apron for Prop Pavement Rehabilitation for 70-seaters x x

8. Existing Apron for B737 Pavement Strengthening to B737 x x

9. New Apron For B777 Strength x x

10. Fire Engine One unit of Fire Fighting Vehicle x x

11. Road & Car Park x x

12. Storm Water Drainage System x x

13. Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL)

SALs for RWY 09 and RWY 27 x x

PAPI for RWY 09/27 - -

Nighttime Operations x x

CCR & Control & Monitoring System x x

14. Access Road Resurfacing and Storm Water Drainage x x

15. Perimeter Road Sealing x x

16. Perimeter Fence x x

Estimated Preliminary Cost (‘1000 PGK) 179,119 187,162


5-78

Note. B737 as well as diverted B767/B777/B787 should make 180-degree turn on the runway or on the turn pad provided at the runway ends, taxi on the runway and enter the stub taxiway B and proceed to the apron via the parallel taxiway TW-A(2), or enter the stub taxiway TW-C and proceed to the apron. Pavement of the other part of parallel taxiway, TW-A(1) and TW-A(4), will be rehabilitated but not strong enough to accommodate B737.

Figure 5.5-1 Runway, Taxiways, Apron and AGL Rehabilitation: Option 1

GSEpark

R38

.10

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

23.0

5.0

01

5.0

05

.00

20

.00

23

.0

45

.00

72

.04

5.0

0

74.746.8

72

.0

74.7 46.8 SALSSALS

Strengthened Pavement

Rehabilitated Pavement for Maintenance

TW-A(1) TW-A(3) TW-A(4)

TW

-C TW

-D

TW

-B

TW-A(2)

121.50330.00

55mx6 spot 88.00 33.50

33.50

10

1.5

0

64

.00

26

.00

11

.50

23

.0

23.0

Revised Option-1 layout plan

TW-N


5-79

Note. Parallel taxiway TW-A(1) and TW-A(4) as well as TW D will be reinforced but not widened. B737 is able to taxi on the parallel taxiway. Diverted B767/B777/B787 should make 180-degree turn at the runway ends, taxi on the runway and enter the stub taxiway B and proceed to the apron via the parallel taxiway TW-A(2), or enter the stub taxiway TW-C and proceed to the apron.

Figure 5.5-2 Runway, Taxiways, Apron and AGL Rehabilitation: Option 2

GSEpark

R38

.10

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

23.0

5.0

015.0

05.0

0

20.0

0

23.0

45.0

0

72.0

45.0

0

74.746.8

72.0

74.7 46.8 SALSSALS

Strengthened Pavement

Rehabilitated Pavement for Maintenance

TW-A(1) TW-A(3) TW-A(4)

TW

-C TW

-D

TW

-B

TW-N

TW-A(2)

121.50330.00

55mx6 spot 88.00 33.50

33.50

101.5

0

64.0

026.0

0

11.5

0

23.0

23.0

Revised Option-2 layout plan


5-80

2) Evaluation of Runway/Taxiways/Apron/AGL/Related Facilities Rehabilitation Options

a) Functional Aspects

[Option 1] In the case of Option 1, both B737 and B767/B777/B787 would need to make 180-degree turn on the runway or on the turn pad at the runway ends, then taxi to the exit point to Taxiways B and C and further proceed to the parking positions on the apron and vice versa. A new stub taxiway is to be constructed to connect the new apron and Taxiways B as well as Taxiway C via the parallel taxiway. The Option 1 is the minimum required to achieve the project targets.

[Option 2] In case of Option 2, all of the taxiways pavement would be strengthened to B737 and therefore no limitation on operation of B737 would be imposed in principle. However ground maneuvering of B767/B777/B787 would be limited to the turn pads on the runway, Taxiways B and C and the new stub taxiway. Such limitation is acceptable and the Option 2 offers full flexibility in the aircraft ground maneuvering.

b) Construction Cost Aspect

Preliminary construction cost has been estimated for the purpose of evaluation of the options. The construction cost estimate was in principle based on the contract prices of CADIP (mainly Mt. Hagen and Jacksons/Port Moresby) and market prices submitted by local contractors. Result is summarized in Table 5.5-2 below.

Table 5.5-2 Summary Result of Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate (‘1000 PGK) (Runway/Taxiway/Apron/AGL/Related Facilities)

Items Option 1 Option 2

Runway Pavement Works 71,471 71,471

Taxiway Pavement Works 46,110 51,773

Apron & GSE Pavement Works 17,055 17,055

Other Civil Works 26,741 29,121

Sub-total Civil Works 161,376 169,419

Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL) 15,253 15,253

Fire Fighting Vehicle (FFV) 2,490 2,490

Total Civil, AGL & FFV 179,119 187,162

Total Civil, AGL & FFV converted to JPY (Million)

8,634 9,021


5-81

c) Conclusion

From functional viewpoint, the Option 1 covers the minimum required scope to ensure achievement of the project targets with limited operational flexibility while the Option 2 would be able to offer almost full flexibility in the aircraft operations. With regard to the cost, the difference in the estimated construction costs for both Options is PGK 8.054 million (JPY 387 million) only.

Although the forecast frequency of B737 class aircraft in 2026 is still low, it is considered very much desirable to allow unidirectional ground movements of all the scheduled aircraft on the runway and parallel taxiway for safety and efficiency of future Nadzab Airport. Therefore, the Option 2 has been chosen as the proposed scope of the runway, taxiways, aprons as well as AGL and related facilities of Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project.


5-82

5.5.2 Terminal and Related Facilities

In order to achieve the Project targets while maintaining the construction cost as minimum required, the single-story passenger terminal concept should be the priority while limited passenger handling facilities and equipment to accommodate B737 and larger aircraft are to be added on the second level, thus offering safe and convenient handling for all passengers.

Cargo handling could be carried out in the existing passenger terminal building after renovation.

Construction of a new administration building as well as a new rescue and fire-fighting station with adequate monitor/control/communication systems should also be the priority so that functional integrity between the facilities is strengthened and efficiency and safety of the airport operations are enhanced.

The outdated and deteriorated utilities should be improved as one of the first priority components.

In conclusion, following rehabilitation has been chosen as the preferred option for Nadzab Airport Rehabilitation Project:

Construction of a new passenger terminal building (one story plus limited second level passenger handling);

Renovation of the existing passenger terminal building for cargo handling; Construction of a new administration building; Construction of a new rescue and fire-fighting station; Renovation of the existing control tower; and Improvement of electrical power supply, water supply, fire alarm/hydrant control system, waste

water treatment and associated civil works.

5.5.3 Erap River Embankment

As described in 5.4.11 above, improvement of the existing embankment (1st phase: L=1,300m) as well as its extension of 2nd phase-a (L=1,140m) and 2nd phase-b (L=260m) should be implemented as a part of the Project. Some more information and discussion on Erap River and the embankment is contained in Section 13.


5-83

5.5.4 Proposed Project Components and Preliminary Construction Cost

Table 5.5-3 shows the proposed project components and preliminary construction cost.

Table 5.5-3 Proposed Project Components and Preliminary Construction Cost

1000PGK 1000JPYA. Civil Works 169,419 8,165,000A.1 Runway 71,470 3,445,000A.2 Stub TWY B 7,963 384,000A.3 Stub TWY C 9,983 481,000A.4 Parallel TWY A(1), A(2), A(4), D 9,501 458,000A.5 Parallel TWY A(3) 19,028 917,000A.6 New Stub TWY 5,298 255,000A.7 Existing Apron 10,807 521,000A.8 New Apron 4,934 238,000A.9 Ground Support Equipment Area 1,314 63,000A.10 Circulation Road & Car Park 2,946 142,000A.11 Storm Water Drainage System 6,441 310,000A.12 Access Road 7,981 385,000A.13 Perimeter Road 7,348 354,000A.14 Perimeter Fence 4,405 212,000B. Building Works 151,076 7,283,000B.1 Utility 12,419 599,000B.2 Passenger Terminal Building 110,161 5,310,000B.3 Cargo Terminal Building 2,664 128,000B.4 Administration Building 5,431 262,000B.5 Rescue and Fire-fighting Station 5,687 274,000B.6 Sub Station 13,704 661,000B.7 Control Tower 1,010 49,000C. Aeronautical Ground Lights (AGL) Works 15,253 735,196C.1 Simple Apprach Lighting Systems (SALS) 844 40,681C.2 Precision Apprach Path Indicators (PAPI) 0 0C.3 Runway Lighting System 2,455 118,331C.4 Taxiway Lighting System 3,523 169,809C.5 Other Lighting 382 18,413C.6 Apron Flood Lights 1,757 84,688C.7 Underground Cable and Ducts 2,517 121,319C.8 Control and Monitoring System 2,312 111,438C.9 Training, Spare Parts, FC 1,463 70,517D. Procurement of Fire Fighting Vehicle 2,490 120,018E. Sub Total (A+B+C+D) 338,238 16,303,214F. Embankment Improvement for Erap River Flood Protection 11,622 560,180F.1 Improvement of Existing Embankment (1st Phase) 4,427 213,381F.2 Extension toward Northwest (2nd Phase-a) 5,859 282,404F.3 Extension toward Southwest (2nd Phase-b) 1,336 64,395G. Grand Total (E+F) 349,860 16,863,394

Project ComponentsPreliminary Construction Cost

PGK=JPY48.2