Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Independent,
integrated
thinking
Independent,
integrated
thinking
Liz Foubister
IEMA Webinar
30th July 2014
Experience from the first large scale tidal turbine EIA in
Europe
How do we work towards effective and proportionate
EIA?
1. Introduction to Xodus
2. The MeyGen Tidal Energy Project
3. Summary of EIA findings
4. What’s needed for future effective EIAs
5. How do we move forward?
What am I Going to Talk About?
‘effective’ – in context of EIA for a ‘novel’ industry
Leading energy consultants providing environmental and engineering
support to marine renewables (wave and tidal), offshore wind and oil and gas
industries
Key relevant experience:
MeyGen Tidal Array EIA – Europe’s largest consented tidal project (86 MW)
Torr Head Tidal Array Project (TVL)
Hywind Scotland Pilot Park Project EIA (Hywind)
Brough Head Wave Energy Project EIA (Aquamarine)
Costa Head Wave Energy Project EIA (SSE)
Siadar Wave Energy Project EIA (Voith Hydro)
Tidal and wave demonstrator projects (various) – EMEC test facility
Strategic advice to government and other organisations
Introduction to Xodus
Context of Today’s Presentation
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
FEED completed
Turbine technology specification
Application submitted
Determination period for application
Consent award (Phase 1A - 4 x 1.5MW turbines)
Procurement
Commence onshore construction
Commence offshore installation
Operational
Saltire Prize generation period
TODAY
Todays presentation is very much about lessons learned to date
Still some way to go, but need to share lessons as early as possible
The Project
Orkney office 100% owned by
The Project
SHETL options
Up to 61 tidal turbines – generic design
Individual turbine foundations
Individual turbine cables to shore
Cables bundled = 29 bundles to shore
Offshore Project Components
2 potential cable landfalls
Horizontally Directionally Drilled landfalls (29 bores – 3 cables per bore)
Onshore Power Conversion Centre (PCC)
• 3 x Power Conversion Unit Buildings (PCUBs)
• 1 x Control Building
Underground cables to SHETL grid connection (4-5 km) – separate planning
Onshore Project Components
SUMMARY OF EIA FINDINGS
EIA Scoping
Potentially significant impacts – pre and post mitigation
Proposed environmental monitoring strategy
• Industry wide ‘strategic’ monitoring
• Project specific monitoring
EIA Scoping
SHETL options
EIA
16 Topics
Scoping Opinion
>250 issues
Impact topic Potentially significant impact
Significant impact post mitigation
Strategic monitoring
Project monitoring (Note 1)
Comments
Physical Environment and Sediment Dynamics
N/a Validation of modelling / impact assessment
Benthic Habitats and Ecology N/a
Surveys to confirm cuttings dispersion and detect any significant seabed changes
Marine Mammals Harbour seals key issue
Collision potentially significant; large array only Disturbance and displacement; collision risk (marine mammal behaviour around turbines) Inform mitigation for larger arrays
Ornithology Located within an SPA
N/a
Collision not a significant impact Disturbance and displacement; collision risk (diving bird behaviour around turbines) to confirm impact assessment
Fish Ecology
Collision not a significant impact Lack of data on salmonid migration routes
Commercial Fisheries N/a Ongoing consultation with local fishermen
Marine Cultural Heritage N/a
Reporting protocol – discovery of unknown marine cultural heritage material
Navigation
Tolerable Risk
Monitoring to establish changes in vessel behaviour e.g. re routing implications
Offshore EIA Studies Note 1 – reduced monitoring for Phase 1a
Impact topic Potentially significant impact
Significant impact post mitigation
Strategic monitoring
Project monitoring
Comments
Geology, Hydrology and Hydrogeology
Surface water visual inspections, water quality, environmental clerk of works
Terrestrial Habitats and Ecology Pre construction surveys (where required)
Landscape, Seascape and Visual N/a
N/a
Mitigation built into design
Onshore Cultural Heritage Reporting protocol
Tourism and Recreation Ongoing consultation with local stakeholders
Socio economic N/a Economic opportunities
Onshore Transport and Access Ongoing consultation with local stakeholders
Onshore Noise and Dust Noise surveys during construction and operation
Accidental Events -
Onshore / Other EIA Studies
Need to work towards proportionate and effective EIA
First step……
Standard methodologies – urgent need for these
Survey methodologies
• what do we need to know?
• aid data transfer between sites / technologies / species
Impact assessment - birds, fish & mammals
• what level of assessment appropriate?
Environmental monitoring
Understand the practical implementation of survey, deploy and monitor
Strategic versus project specific monitoring areas
Learning from monitoring undertaken to date e.g. MCT, EMEC
Project advisory monitoring group – if other projects in PFOW go ahead
likely to morph into strategic area monitoring group e.g. as for offshore wind
Future EIAs can then focus on KEY issues
What’s Needed to Assist Future EIAs?
EMEC / Prototype deployments
Ensure timely availability of research
Engage further with industry to help scope future research
Better data sharing needed for the benefit of everyone
Regulators and their advisors, The Crown Estate
Adapt advice, guidance & policies quickly in response to findings of:
• Early EIAs and HRAs
• Strategic research
• Early monitoring
Strong leadership on focus on key issues
Novel issues – adopt industry acceptable survey and assessment approaches
Well resourced – not only manpower, experienced, knowledgeable people
Ensure strategic research published as early as possible
Where appropriate be less precautionary based on early results
Developers and their consultants
Buy into results of early EIAs to minimise ‘over’ scoping of later consent applications
Early communication of lessons learned to ensure input to future design
Timely publication of monitoring results
Collaboration between developers where appropriate
How do we Expediate Evolution? Everyone has a part to play…….
THANK YOU