Upload
coleen-navarro
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Independent Civil Action vs Separate Civil Action
1/5
INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS
Sec. 3. When civil action may proceed independently. In the cases provided in
Articles 32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, the independent civil
action may be brought by the offended party. It shall proceed independently of the
criminal action and shall require only a preponderance of evidence. In no case,
however, may the offended party recover damages twice for the same act or omission
charged in the criminal action.
WHAT ARE THE INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS?
> The independent civil actions are those provided in Articles 32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the
Civil Code
> They may proceed independently of the criminal action and shall require only a
preponderance of evidence
> This is the principle of independent civil actionsit can proceed independently
from the criminal action. Nonetheless, the offended party may not have double
recovery. The offended party only gets the bigger award.
Independent Civil Action
I. Independent Civil Action
Art. 31. When the civil action is based on an obligation not arising from the act or
omission complained of as a felony, such civil action may proceed independently of the
criminal proceedings and regardless of the result of the latter.
Art. 32. Any public officer or employee, or any private individual, who directly or
indirectly obstructs, defeats, violates or in any manner impedes or impairs any of the
following rights and liberties of another person shall be liable to the latter for damages:
In any of the cases referred to in this article, whether or not the defendants act or
omission constitutes a criminal offense, the aggrieved party has a right to commence an
entirely separate and distinct civil action for damages, and for other relief. Such civil
action shall proceed independently of any criminal prosecution (if the latter beinstituted), and mat be proved by a preponderance of evidence.
The indemnity shall include moral damages. Exemplary damages may also be
adjudicated.
The responsibility herein set forth is not demandable from a judge unless his act or
omission constitutes a violation of the Penal Code or other penal statute.
7/27/2019 Independent Civil Action vs Separate Civil Action
2/5
Art. 33. In cases of defamation, fraud, and physical injuries a civil action for damages,
entirely separate and distinct from the criminal action, may be brought by the injured
party. Such civil action shall proceed independently of the criminal prosecution, and
shall require only a preponderance of evidence.
Art. 34. When a member of a city or municipal police force refuses or fails to render aid
or protection to any person in case of danger to life or property, such peace officer shall
be primarily liable for damages, and the city or municipality shall be subsidiarily
responsible therefor. The civil action herein recognized shall be independent of any
criminal proceedings, and a preponderance of evidence shall suffice to support such
action.
Art 2176. Whoever by any act or omission causes damage or injury to another, there
being fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for the damage done. Such fault or
negligence, if there is no prexisting contractual relation between the parties shall beknown as Quasi Delict and shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter.
Rule 111 Rules of Court
Section 3. When civil action may proceeded independently. In the cases provided for
in Articles 32, 33, 34 and 2176 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, the independent civil
action may be brought by the offended party. It shall proceed independently of the
criminal action and shall require only a preponderance of evidence. In no case,
however, may the offended party recover damages twice for the same act or omission
charged in the criminal action.
SUSPENSION OF CIVIL ACTION
Details
Category: Criminal Procedure
SUSPENSION OF CIVIL ACTION
Sec. 2. When separate civil action is suspended. After the criminal action hasbeen commenced, the separate civil action arising therefrom cannot be
instituted until final judgment has been entered in the criminal action.
If the criminal action is filed after the said civil action has already been instituted,
the latter shall be suspended in whatever state it may be found before judgment
http://www.batasnatin.com/law-library/remedial-law/criminal-procedure/486-suspension-of-civil-action.htmlhttp://www.batasnatin.com/law-library/remedial-law/criminal-procedure.htmlhttp://www.batasnatin.com/law-library/remedial-law/criminal-procedure.htmlhttp://www.batasnatin.com/law-library/remedial-law/criminal-procedure/486-suspension-of-civil-action.html7/27/2019 Independent Civil Action vs Separate Civil Action
3/5
on the merits. The suspension shall last until final judgment is rendered in
the criminal action. Nevertheless, before judgment on the merits rendered in
the civil action, the same may, upon motion of the offended party, be
consolidated with the criminal action in the court trying the criminal action.
In case of consolidation, the evidence already adduced in the civil
action shall be deemed automatically reproduced in the criminal action
without prejudice to the right of the prosecution to cross-examine the witness
presented by the offended party in the criminal case and of the parties to
present
additional evidence. The consolidated criminal and civil actions shall be tried
and decided jointly.
During the pendency of the criminal action, the running period of
prescription of the civil action which cannot be instituted separately or
whose proceeding has been suspended shall be tolled.
The extinction of the penal action does not carry with it extinction of the civil
action. However, the civil action based on delict shall be deemed extinguished if
there is a finding in a final judgment in the criminal action that the act or omission
from which the civil liability may arise did not exist.
WHEN IS THE SEPARATE CIVIL ACTION SUSPENDED?
> After the criminal action has been commenced, the separate civil action arising
therefrom cannot be instituted until final judgment has been entered in the criminal
action.
> If the criminal action is filed after the said civil action has already been instituted, the
latter shall be suspended in whatever state it may be found before judgment on the
merits. The suspension shall last until final judgment is rendered in the criminal action.
> Nonetheless, the civil action may be consolidate with the criminal action at any time
before judgment on the merits upon motion of the offended party with the court trying
the criminal action
> The evidence presented at the civil action shall be deemed reproduced in the
criminal action without prejudice to the right of the prosecution to cross-examine the
7/27/2019 Independent Civil Action vs Separate Civil Action
4/5
witness presented by the offended party in the criminal case and of the parties to
present additional evidence. The consolidated criminal actions shall be tried and
decided jointly
> ONLY EXCEPTION: a prejudicial question arising in a previously filed civil
action should be resolved first
ARE THE INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTIONS ALSO DEEMED SUSPENDED WITH THE
FILING OF THE CRIMINAL ACTION?
> No, only the civil action arising from the crime under Article 100 of the RPC is
suspended
> The independent civil actions are not suspended and may continue even if the
criminal action has been instituted
> However, the offended party may not recover twice from the same act> He should only get the bigger award
Defi nition of a Prejudicial Question A prejudicial question is one which must be
decided fi rst before a criminal action may be instituted or may proceed be- cause adecision therein is vital to the judgment in the criminal case. In the case of People v.
Adelo Aragon (L-5930, Feb. 17, 1954), the Supreme Court defi ned it as one which
arises in a case, the resolution of which question is a logical antecedent of the issues
involved in said case and the cognizance of which pertains to another tribunal. The
prejudicial question must
Art. 36
CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
226
be determinative of the case before the Court; this is the fi rst element. Jurisdiction to try
said question must be lodged in another tribunal; this is the second element. (See
Carlos v. CA, 79 SCAD 582 [1997]). Indeed, for a civil case to be considered prejudicial
to a criminal action as to cause the suspension of the latter pend- ing the fi nal
determination of the former, it must appear not only that the civil case involves the same
7/27/2019 Independent Civil Action vs Separate Civil Action
5/5
facts upon which the criminal prosecution would be based, but also that in the resolution
of the issues raised in said civil action, the guilt or innocence of the accused would
necessarily be determined. (Mendiola, et al. v. Macadaeg, et al., L-16874, Feb. 27,
1961). In an action for bigamy, for example, if the accused claims that the fi rst marriage
is null and void, and the right to decide such validity is vested in another tribunal, the
civil action for nullity must fi rst be decided before the action for bigamy can proceed;
hence, the validity of the fi rst marriage is a prejudicial question. (People v. Adelo
Aragon, L-5930, Feb. 17, 1954).