Upload
phungthuy
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Increasing In-Place Densities to Improve the Performance of Asphalt Pavements
SHRP2 Performance Specifications for Rapid Renewal (R07)
Ray Brown, National Center for Asphalt Technology
September 20, 2016
Density essential for good performance
Some say that density is the most important factor that affects performance
Density may not be the most important factor but it is clearly an important factor
National density variability
3
Cumulative Frequency of Construction Densities
0102030405060708090
100
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96
Percent Maximum Density, %
Cum
ulat
ive
Freq
uenc
y, %
55%
78%
Low density causes unacceptable permeability
FHWA funded project to improve density
NCAT prepared report on expected savings due to increased density
Ten states funded to investigate improved density For each state:
Best practices presentation by Asphalt Institute Preconstruction meeting to discuss plans Construction of control section and test section(s)
documented by NCAT
5
NCAT study funded by FHWA
NCAT report showed that 1% increase in density conservatively resulted in at least 10% increase in life
NCAT Report 16-02 (can be downloaded from ncat.us)
ENHANCED COMPACTION TO IMPROVE DURABILITY AND EXTEND PAVEMENT SERVICE LIFE: A LITERATURE REVIEW
By Nam Tran, Pamela Turner, and James Shambley
6
FHWA funded project to improve density
Ten states funded to evaluate methods for improving density NCAT selected to monitor these projects Construction of projects were to be completed in 2016 Seven of these projects have been completed Each project had to have a control section and at least one test
section For control section the contractor followed his normal compaction
procedures For test section, contractor looked for ways to improve compaction
without changing mix or without adding additional rollers Some states elected to construct 2 test sections
7
Some items being usedto improve density
8
Increase number of passes Apply more passes with vibrator on Reduce speed of rollers Some states elected to construct a second test section
where additional an additional roller was used
Target density
Percent of Laboratory Not used much today In-place density compared to laboratory density
Percent of TMD---Generally preferred method Most common method used today In-place density compared to theoretical maximum
density Percent of Control Strip
Still used by some today but must use caution In-place density compared to density obtained in
control strip9
What density level do we need
How about 92% of TMD? How about 94% of TMD? How about 96% of TMD?
10
Type of mix
Fine-graded mixes tend to be less permeable for equal density than coarse-graded mixes
11
Mix consistency
Mix variability results in increased variability in density
Use of material transfer vehicle will help to reduce variability
Use of infrared camera and IR bar will help to ensure reduced temperature variability
12
Sampling for QC testing
Good procedures should be used for sampling whether samples taken from truck or behind paver or from some other location.
Material transfer vehicle
Some devices remix asphalt and these are preferred
Even if they dont remix they do keep paver and trucks separated resulting in smoother pavement
14
Mix temperature
As mix cools it generally becomes more difficult to compact
Some have used WMA as a compaction aid Infrared gun measures the surface temp but not internal
temp Thin layers cool quicker so must be rolled quicker
especially in cool weather---this may mean more rollers
15
Keep rollers close up to paver
Typically good to keep rollers close behind paver
16
Laboratory air voids
Some have reduced laboratory air voids to help ensure specs are met for density
Must be careful when adding asphalt cement to lower air voids since this may result in rutting
This resulted in major rutting prior to Superpave Superpave placed emphasis on controlling volumetrics
during construction and reduced the amount of projects adding additional asphalt to reduce in-place air voids
17
Layer thickness and NMAS
The thickness to NMAS should be at least 3 for fine-graded mixtures and at least 4 for coarse-graded mixtures.
18
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0t/NMAS
Incr
ease
in A
ir Vo
ids,
%
All Data
Fine-graded
Coarse-graded
Chart1
4.0818181818
1.5
0.2363636364
0.4181818182
t/NMAS
Increase in Air Voids, %
Chart2
4.08181818182.654.4
1.50.71.6777777778
0.23636363640.050.2777777778
0.41818181820.70.3555555556
All Data
Fine-graded
Coarse-graded
t/NMAS
Increase in Air Voids, %
Sheet1
2.20.80.10.12.20.80.10.1
3.10.601.33.10.601.3
2.510.50ave2.70.70.10.7
1.70.400.8
4.71.70.20.22.510.50
1.10.200.51.70.400.8
10.33.60.30.84.71.70.20.2
6.53.20.501.10.200.5
1.80.60.10.110.33.60.30.8
4.81.400.86.53.20.50
6.230.901.80.60.10.1
ave4.11.50.20.44.81.400.8
6.230.90
ave4.41.70.30.4
Increase in Air Voids, %
2.04.12.74.4
3.01.50.71.7
4.00.20.10.3
5.00.40.70.4
Sheet2
Sheet3
Roller weight and type of roller
Typically 10-12 ton vibratory rollers used. Weight and tire pressure important for rubber tire rollers.
19
Oscillating roller
Oscillating roller has shown some promise to obtain good density but more research needed.
20
Quality of bond between layers
Clean underlying surface Consistent application of
tack coat should be applied
Too much tack sometimes a problem
Allow to cure before placing asphalt mixture
21
Ensuring satisfactory bond
Bond test has been developed but not implemented by many
Bond test would be helpful
22
Roller pattern
What pattern works on one project may not work on the next project
Use density gauge to help set rolling pattern
23
Watch out for tender zone
24
Testing location is important
Some areas receive more compaction than other areas
Density tests should be at random locations
25
Summary
Increased effort to obtain density can result in at least 1 to 2 percent higher density
1 to 2% higher density will provide a significant increase in pavement life, generally believed to be 10-20%
26