1
Incongruence in Constriction Velocity and Neurological Pupil Index™ Sonja Stutzman 1 , Venkatesh Aiyagari 1 , Michelle Hill 2 , Chad Miller 2 , Folefac Atem 3 , DaiWai Olson 1 The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Dallas, TX) 1 , Riverside Methodist Hospital (Colombus, Ohio) 2 , University of Texas Health Science Center (Houston, TX) 3 Purpose Conclusion Results Methods Background Corresponding Author: Sonja Stutzman, [email protected] -Subjects had a mean age of 57.3 years and 50% were male. The primary admission diagnosis included cerebral neoplasm (286), ischemic stroke (195), SAH (94), ICH (111), and other (454). The left eye mean/s.d. CV (1.8/0.9) NPi (4.2/0.8) and size (3.5/1.1) were similar to the right eye CV (1.9/0.9) NPi (4.2/0.8) and size (3.5/1.1). The statistically significant difference in size and NPi (p<0.001) is likely related to the large sample size. -Table 1 shows that there were a total of 6,654 readings (86%) for the left and 6,042 (78%) for the right eye where the CV and NPi were in agreeance. There were 1,060 (14%) for the left eye and 1,672 (22%) for the right eye where the CV and NPi were not in agreement. -The correlation between left eye CV and NPi (r 2 =0.36, p<0.001) was significantly improved after controlling for size (r 2 =0.77, p<0.0001). The correlation between right eye CV and NPi (r 2 =0.31, p<0.001) was significantly improved after controlling for size (r2=0.63, p<0.0001). The historical tradition of examining the PLR required the examiner to score the size and reactivity of the pupil; generally classified at brisk, slugglish, or fixed. Previous research has shown inconsistency in rating the PLR with a pen light, especially when the pupil is considered sluggish or fixed.¹ A change in the PLR from brisk to sluggish or fixed may be a marker of a pathological process and a need for intervention (e.g., CT scan, medication administration, decreased time between neurologic assessment intervals). The NeurOptics Pupilometer has shown promise in standardizing pupillary assessments that can be trended over time.² An NPi < 3.0 is considered to be abnormal.² Additionally, when the CV <0.8 the pupillary reaction is considered to be abnormal in a health patient population, but little has been done to research the correlation between NPi and CV in the neurocriticial care population. Handheld pupillometry provides several novel measures, such as the neurological pupillary index™ (NPi) that can assist in understanding other elements such as constriction velocity (CV) that may be more quantifiable than the pupillary light reflex (PLR). The purpose of this analysis is to examine the relationship between CV and NPi in neurologically injured patients. Constriction velocity is highly dependent on size of the pupil. These initial analyses show that the NPi can be abnormal even when both size and CV are normal. This indicates that NPi and CV are not interchangeable. We postulate that the NPi may be a more sensitive indicator of pupillary dysfunction than the CV. Further studies need to be undertaken to test this hypothesis. The END-PANIC Registry is a multi-center prospective registry of pupillometer values and variables associated with intracranial dynamics (e.g., ICP).³ Data collection is prospective and ongoing for this study. Data is collected directly from the Pupilometer SmartGuard™ and then matched with abstracted data from the EMR. This analysis from 1,140 adult (over 18 years) patients from two hospitals includes 43,084 pupillometer readings; left eye (21,299), and right eye (21,979). CV = 1.4 Really fast NPi = 4.6 Normal function CV = 1.4 Really fast NPi = 0.8 Abnormal function References 1. Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, Wilson M, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments. Neurocritical care. 2016;24(2):251-257. 2. Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S and Bullock RM. Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: The introduction of the Neurological Pupil index. Surgical neurology international. 2011;2:82. 3. Olson DM, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Kincaide JD, Ho TT, Carlisle BA and Aiyagari V. Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessment in Neuroscience Intensive Care: The "END-PANIC" Registry. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2017;49:251- 254. Left Eye NPi > 3.0 NPi < 3.0 Right Eye Npi > 3.0 Npi < 3.0 CV > 0.8 4469 357 CV > 0.8 4357 857 CV < 0.8 703 2185 CV < 0.8 815 1685 Table 1. Correlations between NPi and CV Figure 1. Fit Plot between NPi and Size Support for this research is provided by NeurOptics Inc.

Incongruence in Constriction Velocity and Neurological ... DM, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Kincaide JD, Ho TT, Carlisle BA and Aiyagari V. Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessment

  • Upload
    lenhan

  • View
    218

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Incongruence in Constriction Velocity and Neurological ... DM, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Kincaide JD, Ho TT, Carlisle BA and Aiyagari V. Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessment

Incongruence in Constriction Velocity and Neurological Pupil Index™

Sonja Stutzman1, Venkatesh Aiyagari1, Michelle Hill2, Chad Miller2, Folefac Atem3, DaiWai Olson1

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Dallas, TX) 1, Riverside Methodist Hospital (Colombus, Ohio) 2, University of Texas Health Science Center (Houston, TX)3

Purpose

ConclusionResults

Methods

Background

Corresponding Author: Sonja Stutzman, [email protected]

-Subjects had a mean age of 57.3 years and 50% were male. Theprimary admission diagnosis included cerebral neoplasm (286),ischemic stroke (195), SAH (94), ICH (111), and other (454). Theleft eye mean/s.d. CV (1.8/0.9) NPi (4.2/0.8) and size (3.5/1.1)were similar to the right eye CV (1.9/0.9) NPi (4.2/0.8) and size(3.5/1.1). The statistically significant difference in size and NPi(p<0.001) is likely related to the large sample size.-Table 1 shows that there were a total of 6,654 readings (86%) forthe left and 6,042 (78%) for the right eye where the CV and NPiwere in agreeance. There were 1,060 (14%) for the left eye and1,672 (22%) for the right eye where the CV and NPi were not inagreement.-The correlation between left eye CV and NPi (r2=0.36, p<0.001)was significantly improved after controlling for size (r2=0.77,p<0.0001). The correlation between right eye CV and NPi (r2=0.31,p<0.001) was significantly improved after controlling for size(r2=0.63, p<0.0001).

The historical tradition of examining the PLR required theexaminer to score the size and reactivity of the pupil; generallyclassified at brisk, slugglish, or fixed. Previous research has showninconsistency in rating the PLR with a pen light, especially whenthe pupil is considered sluggish or fixed.¹ A change in the PLRfrom brisk to sluggish or fixed may be a marker of a pathologicalprocess and a need for intervention (e.g., CT scan, medicationadministration, decreased time between neurologic assessmentintervals). The NeurOptics Pupilometer has shown promise instandardizing pupillary assessments that can be trended overtime.² An NPi < 3.0 is considered to be abnormal.² Additionally,when the CV <0.8 the pupillary reaction is considered to beabnormal in a health patient population, but little has been doneto research the correlation between NPi and CV in theneurocriticial care population.

Handheld pupillometry provides several novel measures, such asthe neurological pupillary index™ (NPi) that can assist inunderstanding other elements such as constriction velocity (CV)that may be more quantifiable than the pupillary light reflex(PLR). The purpose of this analysis is to examine the relationshipbetween CV and NPi in neurologically injured patients.

Constriction velocity is highly dependent on size of the pupil.These initial analyses show that the NPi can be abnormal evenwhen both size and CV are normal. This indicates that NPi and CVare not interchangeable. We postulate that the NPi may be a moresensitive indicator of pupillary dysfunction than the CV. Furtherstudies need to be undertaken to test this hypothesis.

The END-PANIC Registry is a multi-center prospective registry ofpupillometer values and variables associated with intracranialdynamics (e.g., ICP).³ Data collection is prospective and ongoingfor this study. Data is collected directly from the PupilometerSmartGuard™ and then matched with abstracted data from theEMR. This analysis from 1,140 adult (over 18 years) patients fromtwo hospitals includes 43,084 pupillometer readings; left eye(21,299), and right eye (21,979).

CV = 1.4 Really fastNPi = 4.6 Normal function

CV = 1.4 Really fastNPi = 0.8 Abnormal function

References1. Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, Wilson M, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Interrater

Reliability of Pupillary Assessments. Neurocritical care. 2016;24(2):251-257.2. Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S and Bullock RM. Pupillary

reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: Theintroduction of the Neurological Pupil index. Surgical neurology international.2011;2:82.

3. Olson DM, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Kincaide JD, Ho TT, Carlisle BA and Aiyagari V.Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessment in NeuroscienceIntensive Care: The "END-PANIC" Registry. The Journal of neuroscience nursing: journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2017;49:251-254.

Left Eye NPi > 3.0 NPi < 3.0 Right Eye Npi > 3.0 Npi < 3.0

CV > 0.8 4469 357 CV > 0.8 4357 857

CV < 0.8 703 2185 CV < 0.8 815 1685

Table 1. Correlations between NPi and CV Figure 1. Fit Plot between NPi and Size

Support for this research is provided by NeurOptics Inc.