Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
70TH YEAR OF STATISTICS OF INCE
David Paris and Keith Gilmour Internal Revenue Service
Since enactment of the moiern income tax inReports were to be made annually by the
1913 statistics based on information reported Comissioner of Internal Revenue with the
on Federal tax returns filed by U.S individual approval of the Secretary of the Treasury
taxpayers have been made available to the The initial volume of the annual Statistics
public These detailed income and tax statis of Income SOI series contained detailed data
tics have been published since 1916 as annual for Income Year 1916 as well as the few
Statistics of Income SOI reports Althoughstatistics for 19131915 shown in Figure
the focus of this paper is on the individual
income tax return program rnjch of the material Figure A.Returns Income and Tax 19131915
is relevant to the development of other SOl ________________________________________________
programs as well Number Net Income
Organizationally the paper is divided intoIncome of Income Tax
eight parts The first part provides surrmaryYear Returns millions millions
of the beginnings and the history of as
seen in the development of one if its principal1913 357598 $3900 $28
programs The next part covers major law1914 357515 $4000 $41
changes affecting the scope of the Federal 1915 336652 $4600 $68
individual income tax and its revenue yieldSections to highlight statistics which show
the tremendous growth in return filings the During the early years of the Statistics of
change in the amount and composition of income Income the individual income tax tabulations
and the historical pattern of the average tax were few in rumber and relatively uncomplicated
rate The two sections which follow examine Until the late 1920s the individual income
changes in statistical data sourcesstatistics particularly emphasized the tax the
methodology and processing Finally there issize of income producing the tax and where the
brief look at the new directions envisioned returns were filed major portion of each
for the processing of and the productsbook related to geography Not only were there
generated from the S0I ProgramsState tables showing number of returns incomeand tax classified by size of income but the
BACKGROUND AND HISTORY number of returns for each county city and
town were available for 21 years
After an 18year lapse in Federal income As runerous Congressional Federal State and
taxation the Sixteenth Amendment to the private economic research organizations were
Constitution became effective on February 25 created and as the needs of tax aQiiinistrators
1913 This amendment provided that and the estimators of future tax revenue grew
.Congress shall have the power to req.jests were received for new data showing
lay and collect tax on incomes from many detailed characteristics of the income of
whatever sources derived without all persons in the United States Consequently
apportionment among the several by the early 1930s the Statistics of Income
States and without regard to anyhad developed gradually into leading source
census or enumeration of basic economic data For example in
ortly thereafter on October the Income response to need for more detailed income
Tax Act of 1913 was enacted and imposed tax statistics not only for use in tax research
retroactive to March 13 on the income of bothbut also as benchmarks for Cmnerce National
individuals and corporations The only data Income and Products Accounts two voluminous
for the period March to December 1913 show that studies were conducted principally for the
there were fewer than 400000 tax returns filed years 1934 and 1936 These studies were
which met the $3000 minimum income filing produced under the direction of the Treasurys
requirement The income tax for 1913 amounted Division of Tax Research the predecessor of
to about $28 million In its first full yearthe Office of Tax Analysis and financed by the
of operation income tax rose only to $41 Works Progress Aäninistration WPA These
milliona far cry from the 1982 income tax manually compiled handwritten tabulations
before credits figure of $284 billion featured extensive individual and corporate
On September 1916 Congress enacted the data by income size and geographic area The
Revenue Act of 1916 which in addition to worksheets were recently converted to microfilm
various tax measures provided for for east of accessability by researchers The
the preparation and publication design of these tabulations became the protoof statistics reasonably available type of tables which were presented annually or
with respect to the operation of the periodically in the reports during the 1950s
income tax law and containing cThssi- and 1960sfications of taxpayers and of income By Income Year 1946 the JI reports had
and any other facts deemed parti increased to fourteen basic tables largely
nent and valuable through the introduction of crosstabulations
added to indicate how the program New data added along the way covered such items
name may have arisen as detailed sources of income including gain
79
from sales of capital assets standard and changes also occurred Sorie of these changes
itemized cductions incled types of itemized were elimination of llection of taxes at the
deductions nunter of exemptions and tax source 1916 credit for dependents and
payments New classifiers included size ofdeduction for charitable contributions 1917
specific income sources and net income and adoption of preferential tax rates on
The introduction of computers in Statistics lonQ..tellfl capital gains and introduction of the
of Income processing in 1954 was perhaps the gross incoe filing requirennts 1921 In
most significant technological change in its addition in 1939 for the first time all
70year history The tremendous increase in revenue laws were incorporated into single
the volume of returns statistically processed body which came to be known as the Internal
even with sampling coupled with the Revenue Code
increased complexity of the tabulations had In the early 1940s revisions to the law
caused the issuance of the reports to be occurred when the individual income tax was
greatly delayed in the 1940s For example broadened to cover most of the working popu
the 1949 Individual report was released in lation During the 1960s and throughout the
1954 While not the sole reason the use of 1970s there were several tax law changes
computers contributed importantly to the affecting individuals which in addition to
reduction in the publication gap the 1959 revenue cbjectives reflected concern with
Individual report was released in 1961 social objectives
In more recent years the SJI reports have The beginning of the decade of the 1980s
shown further increase in the number of basic again shows an emphasis on revenue objectives
tables For instance added detail is shown For example there were series of tax cuts
for number of returns filed sources of income introduced by the Economic Recovery Tax Act of
marital status and taxable and nontaxable 1981 the thrust of these however was to
returns There is more information for types lessen the individual tax burden rather than
of dependents types of tax computation and for to increase it
several types of tax credits Examples of
items more recently added are statutoryMJPER OF RETURNS
adjustments to income and minimum tax New
classifiers include taxpayers age 65 and over As shown in Figure the number of returns
marginal tax rates and alternative income filed prior to 1940 ranged from approximately
concepts data for which are specifically 300 thousand to million However with the
required by Congress Data from tax return introduction of lower income filing req.Jire
schedules are also being tabulated These data ments for 1940 the number of returns filed
include income averaging tax preferences doubled to more than 14.7 million By 1946 the
residential energy investments and energy number of returns had reached more than 50
investment credit million and by 1950 the number was slightly
Today individual income tax return data as more than 53 million During each of the
well as other tax return statistics produced as decades of the 1950s and 1960s the number
part of Statistics of Income program serve increased by an average of approximately 10
as keystones to economic analysis for both the million returns For Tax Year 1973 the runber
public and the private sectors Among the of returns passed 80 million and rose to over
users of SOl are the Treasury Departments 93 million for the first time for 1980Office of Tax Analysis the Joint Coiunittee on
Taxation of the U.S Congress the Bureau of
the Census and Bureau of Economic Analysis
both in the Department of Coiamerce private
nonprofit research organizations umiversitiesFt
well as many State and local Nrnbsr of Individual R.turns 19131982
In the future as more and more researchers
have access to computers of their own man ofMillions
gen ra increase demands for additional 1913 1950 1960 1970 1980
revenues to finance World War World War IIand the Korean conflict caused rapid and
numerous changes in the tax law The mostJt1948 nurber of
retjrnffiedpassed
the5Omon evel
drastic revisions occurred in the early 1940s 1981 number of returnsfiledreachedaall
time hIgh 01953 mutton
however prior to 1940 many inportant tax law __________________________________________
80
For Income Year 1982 estimates for the
nunber of returns filed showed only very ngure
slight decline to 95.3 million from the Numb.r of Ex.mptlons Oth.r Thin Ag and Blindns$s
alltime high of 95.4 million reached forClaim.d on individuil Tax R.turns vs U.S Population
1981.15 The current level of return filings
is more than twice the runber of returns filedThousands
for 1943 which was the first year of the NO.OE5PUOflS
current system of income tax withholding onu.SPopalaIion
wages and salaries200000f_
Over the 70year history of the modern 175000F
individual income tax the proportion of returns
with income tax before credits has also changed
see Figure Prior to the broadening of the JJJIindividual income tax base in the early 1940s 100.O00
the percent of taxable returns ranged from
high of aroximately 83 percent for 1916 to 60oooL
low of about 44 percent during the depths of
the Great Depression year 1934
1918 1933 1939 1946 1982
Selected Years
FIgure1918 About 10% of the population Coeered by tan returns
Taxabis R.turns Psrcsnt of All R.turna PU.d1933 Because of the Great DepressIon the percentage dropped to approxImately 7%
191 8i 9821939 Population covered bY returns grows to slightly more than the 1918 level
1948 BroadenIng of the tan base caused the percentage to Increase dramatically to
almost 87%
percent
1982 Approsimnately 90% of the population Is now covered
-- ---------
t943
90remained relatively low until the broadening in
1969 the coverage of individuals having to file
returns that occurred in the early 1940s By
55 1946 more than 87 percent of the population
was covered In the 1950s the percentage
grew still further then stabilized at where it
stands todayat approximately 90 percent of
the population It is because of this
widespread representation of the U.S60 population on individual tax returns that the
idea of using tax records has surfaced as
possible viable alternative to the traditionalhO ways of conducting the decennial population
census
401934 TREDS IN INDIVIDURL IMXIaIE
Since 1944 the Statistics of Income reports30- have presented yearly ta centered around the
concept of adjusted gross incomepositivesources of income less negative amounts and
.1916 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 85 70 75 8082 statutory adjustments Prior to then theYea statistics centered around the concept of net
incomepositive sources of income less
negative amounts and allowable deductions
During World War II the highest percentagesBecause of this conceptual difference it is
of taxable returns ever recorded were experi difficult but not inpossible to make any
enced when for both 1943 and 1944 more thandirect and meaningful longrun income
percent of all individual returns filed werecoirparisons However for the entire 70year
taxable In more recent years for 1968 andperiod of the individual income tax concept
1969 the percentages climbed to the secondof total incomepositive sources less
highest levels ever experienced83 and 84 negative amounts as provided for under the tax
percent respectively Estimates for Incomelaw for the particular yearcan be constructed
Year 1982 show the percent of taxable returns Table shows for the period 19131982
remaining about the same as for 1981atthe estimated total income as well as the five
approximately 80 percent components which have historically accounted
The percent of the total U.S populationfor the majority of the total
represented on tax returns is illustrated in As expected the total income reported in
Figure This percent has increased quite current dllars on all individual returns has
dramatically over time For instance for 1918 grown dramatically during this century from
approximately 10 percent of the population was about $20 billion for 1919 to almost $2
represented by taxpayer or dependent on an trillion for 1982 During the Depressionindividual income tax return The percent however there was long period when total
81
income declined For example for 1928 the4- 4- FiguTeE
income repor.eu on rewrns wasCurrsit and Constant Dollar Total Incom 19291939
approximately $27.3 billion During Income 1001
Year 1929 the nation experienced the stock
market crash and huge losses of $1.8 billion Miiiiopfiia4
associated with the sale of real estate constantS.
stocks and bonds were reported For that year 80
total income dropped to $26.6 billion and
continued on downward trend as the Great
Depression progressed to low point of $10.6 70
billion for 1932 During the rest of the
Depression total income reported grew rather 80slowly and only by 1939 did it again surpass
$25 billion
Because of the dranatic increase in the
nujigjer of returns filed during the 1940s by
1945 the total income had increased to $120
billion Over the next fifteen years total 40
income grew steadily and reached more than $31635
billion for 1960 During the decade of the
1960s total income doubled again and with
the rapid inflation of the 1970s and early25
Current$
1980s it grew even more to over three times
the level of the late 1960s .20
Changes in Real Total Income
Presented below in Figure for selected
years is the total income in constant dollars i1adjusted for inflation compared to the 192 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939
current dollar total for the same year
Figure -Total Income for Selected Years Furthermore for the 11year period of 1929 to
19291982 1939 there was 12 percent real growth in
________________________________________________ total income in contrast to very small
Total Income decline in the current dollar totalSelected Current Constant 1972 Generally growth in real total income
Income Dollars Dollars reported on individual income tax returns has
Year millions millions continued at steady pace over the years since
1940 see Figure G-i However unlike the
1929 26.7 61.1 current dollar total for each year which over
1930 17.0 38.0 the last 43 years has experienced only one
1935 12.2 38.6 downturn from the previous year 1949 the
1940 40.2 130.0 pattern of change in the constantdollar total
1945 120.0 272.1 income has generally coincided with the
1950 179.1 314.9 expansion and contraction of the U.S economy
1955 249.0 386.7 For each of the nine tine periods highlighted
1960 316.1 439.7 in Figure C-i the u.s economy experienced1965 432.3 560.0 the end of business cycle expansion the
1970 639.4 691.2 beginning and ending of recession and ttie
1975 962.9 769.1 beginning of new period of growth As1980 1642.3 916.5 shown during each of the periods the growth in
1981 1804.0 927.5 real total income reported on individual1982 1917.0 930.6 returns was flat or in decline This pattern
____________________________________________ of change in real total income was especially
prevalent in the 10year period ending with
1982 during which time the economy experiencedAn exanination of the data shows that the three economic downturns in 19731975 1980
15fold real growth in total income over these and l981l982..see Figure G-254 years is consistent with but less staggerin9 During the recession of 19731975 real total
than the 72fold growth rate in the current income dropped by 0.3 percent for 1974 and .by
dollar total As seen in Figure the 2.6 percent for 1975 and in the recession of
constantdollar total income in the Great 1980 total income dropped slightly 0.1
Depression of the 1930s declined in the same peroent from the 1979 total For the most
pattern as currentdollar total income and recent recessionary period of 19811982 there
reached low point of $38.2 billion for 1932 was very slow growth rate of only tout 1.2
However unlike the currentdollar totals real percent for 1981 and about 0.2 percent for
growth in total income was more rapid because 1982 However despite this slow growth real
of falling prices By Income Year 1937 the total income reported on individual income tax
constant dollar total had passed the returns reached an alltime high for Income
preDepression level of $74.3 billion Year 1982
82
Figure 01Currsnt and Con.tant Dollar Total lflcom 194019821972 100
Current
Millions of Dollars
1969-1970 Constant
1957-1958 1960 1961
400
1945.\
1973-1975
200
Constant
100
96
00
40Current
20
194041 42 43 4419454047 48 49195051 52 53 5419565557 58 59190001 02 03 8410656807 0808191071 72 73 741915101778 7819608102
Veer
Figure 02 Real Total Income 19731975 and sharp consistent proportional decline from
19791982 almost 42 percent of the total for 1916 to less
____________________________________________than percent for 1982 This change in the
Real Total Percent composition of individual income over the years
Year Income Change fran is shown in Figure
thousands Previous Year
INCOIE TAX JD AVERAGE TAX RATE
1973 792630 4.9
1974 789881 0.3 The Statistics of Income reports have
1975 769078 2.6 presented yearly statistics dating back to 1913
on income tax before credits as defined under
1979 917038 3.2 the tax law for the particular year As
1980 916495 0.1 shown in Table in general during the first
1981 927533 1.2 23 years 19131940 the total income tax
1982 930599 0.2 tefore credits shown on the returns tabulated
in SQl fluctuated because of the effect tax
law changes and economic events had on totalincome between approximately $28 million and
jrSources of Individual Income $1.3 billion
However beginning with the growth of
Historically the most important sources of individual incorre in the 1940s total income
income reported an individual returns have been tax before credits rose almost steadilysalaries and wages interest dividends peaking for 1981 at more than $290 billion
business income from sole proprietorships and For 1982 total income tax before credits
partnerships and gains from the sale of capital dropped by approximately $6.3 billion largely
assets For most of the 70year period these reflecting the tax cutting provisions of the
five sources of income have accounted for more Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981than 90 percent of the total individual income Along with the historical increase in total
reported for tax purposes However during income tax before credits there was also steady
this period there was significant change in increase over the past 70 years in the averagethe composition of income Over the years inW.vidual income tax rate see Figure
salaries and wages accoirited for the largest The many different economic events and tax
single source of income Since 1918 they law changes which affected both the definition
represented more than 40 percent of the total of income reported on tax return and the
Interest income which was once the smallest of calculation of tax before credits on this
these five major sources increased rapidly income have naturally caused the rate to
Since 1967 it exceeded dividend income as the fluctuate between less than 1.0 percent for
second largest source Furthermore reflecting 1913 and 16.0 percent the alltime high for
an overall change in the form of business 1981 However since the midl960s the effect
arrangements from unincorporated to of inflation or bracket creep was an
incorporated business income mostly from important economic event which caused the
partnerships and sole proprietorships showed average rate to increase
83
Table 1.Number of Returns Major Sources of Income and Income Tax 19131982
i4umbers of returns are in thousands money amounts are in millions
Maj or sources of incometax
Number of Total Tutal tax
rnDi Id nd
lit itme
All th ditii bility
an wages less less lossscone
10
193 358 3900 n.m n.m n.m n.m n.m n.m 28 28
1914 358 4000 n.m na no n.m no n.m 41 41
1915 337 4.600 n.m n.m n.m n.m n.m n.e 68 b8
1916 437 6.299 1.851 667 2.136 N/A 2.637 992 173 173
1917 3473 13652 3.648 936 2.849 N/A 3640 2.579 795 795
1918 4.425 15.92 8.267 1.403 2469 N/A 4339 553 1.128 1.128
199 5.333 19.859 10756 1.500 2.454 N/A 5.709 560 1270 1.270
1920 7.260 23.736 15.323 1.709 2.736 N/A 4.922 954 1.075 1.075
1921 6.662 19.577 13.813 1.690 2.477 462 3707 2572 719 719
1922 6.787 21.761 13.694 1.738 2664 742 4.267 1.344 861 861
1923 7.698 25313 14193 2.183 3.120 866 6.399 1.448 662 662
1924 7370 26189 13618 2281 3251 1.124 6.565 650 735 704
1925 4171 22.337 9.742 1814 3.465 940 5.516 860 759 735
1926 4.138 22442 9994 1.936 4.012 1.287 5.306 93 757 732
1927 4.102 23054 10.218 2.026 4.255 1.585 5.043 727 856 830
1928 4.144 27338 10945 2.143 4.440 1.708 5.223 2879 1.199 1.164
1929 4.133 26692 11373 2.210 5.081 1.341 5.282 1.40 1.024 1.002
1930 3852 17.047 10.206 1.940 4.632 676 3.101 3.508 502 477
1931 3.411 12.221 8631 1.337 3600 990 2.016 4353 264 246
1932 4.083 10.671 8.356 1.307 2.189 325 1229 2.735 330 330
1933 3.892 11.473 7.565 1.106 1.711 232 1.746 887 374 374
1934 4.198 14957 8.681 995 2.041 18 2125 1.097 511 511
1935 4670 17.193 9.972 980 2.288 363 2.387 1203 657 657
1936 5.486 21773 11.718 955 3.228 852 3.210 1810 1.214 1.214
1937 6.350 24120 14.206 86 3.248 18 3.359 2.293 1.142 1.142
1938 6.251 21.436 13307 823 2.212 176 3.120 2.150 766 766
1939 7.652 25363 16.491 832 2.544 321 3.674 1.501 929 929
1940 14711 40.15 27.707 1.003 2.999 332 5.407 2.707 1.496 1.496
1941 25.870 63433 47.140 1.029 3.299 430 8.45 3.080 3.908 39081942 36.619 85.780 65.617 982 2833 112 12.833 3.403 8.927 8.927
1943 43.722 106.555 82.755 886 2.780 59 15.717 3.822 14.590 14.590
1944 47111 116.465 91.125 3.924 917 17.250 3.249 16.224 16.216
1945 49932 120009 91.700 3.925 2.114 19.003 3.267 17.061 17.001946 52.817 134.083 99.174 1067 3674 3.068 23267 3.833 16091 16.076
1947 55.099 149736 114804 1.125 4.295 2.154 23.29 4.063 18092 18.076
1948 52.072 163.516 125.881 1.293 4.971 2.201 24.506 4.664 15.442 15.442
1949 51.814 160.574 124.883 1528 5.246 1.604 21.705 5.608 14.538 14.538
1950 53060 179148 139073 159 6.157 2.927 23.429 5.967 18.375 18.375
1951 55447 202.337 160.482 1.702 6056 2.997 24.878 6.222 24.439 24.439
1952 56.529 215.290 174339 1847 5.860 2.470 24.754 6.020 27.822 28020193 57.838 228708 187.734 2.043 5.828 2.075 24.951 6.077 29.40 29.657
1954 56747 229.573 185.953 2.370 7.048 3352 25.452 5.398 26.873 26.967
1955 58.20 248.974 200.712 2.584 7.851 4.751 27.454 5.622 29.982 30.077
1956 59.197 268268 215618 2.872 8.606 4.53 30.137 6482 33.134 33.265
1957 59.825 280.895 228.077 3.319 9.124 3.485 29.698 7.192 34.816 34971958 59085 281.777 227.51 3.659 9.741 4.330 29.906 6.590 34755 34.925
1959 60.271 305.772 247.370 4395 9.356 6.275 30.994 12.382 39.09 393471960 61.028 316141 257.918 5.057 9.530 5.300 30.038 8.298 39.909 40.298
1961 61.499 330.617 266.902 5.683 9.890 7.621 31.578 8.943 42714 43.066
1962 62.712 349.484 283373 7155 10.640 5771 33.269 9.276 45.691 45.790
1963 63.943 369.675 299.443 9212 11.452 6.449 33.184 9935 49.117 49.216
1964 65376 399539 323.266 10.125 11917 7939 35.358 10.934 47.896 481851965 67596 432344 347150 11.296 12.961 10180 38.559 12.198 50144 506321966 70.160 472132 381.067 13.225 13998 9941 40.984 12.917 56.773 51.627
1967 71651 509.151 411646 14.899 14.202 13.682 42.280 12.442 63655 64.525
1968 73729 559.760 451.505 16782 15.222 17990 45503 12758 77.440 78.419
1969 75834 603546 498.865 19626 15.740 14.583 45.842 8890 87.336 88.524
1970 74.280 639358 531.884 22021 15.807 9.007 44242 16.397 84156 85767
1971 74576 682467 564967 24731 15.671 13.155 45029 18.914 85.942 87.469
1972 77573 755.540 622599 27.400 16.794 17.076 49616 22055 94.442 954491973 80.693 837.813 687179 32.174 18734 16.672 56.489 26.565 109.394 111.175
1974 83340 918626 758628 39543 20.807 13.470 5505 31.043 125.079 127.003
1975 82229 962887 795399 43434 21.892 14.072 53.736 34354 127.432 127.939
1976 84670 1070180 880.998 48588 24.461 18.962 59.637 37934 144.186 145.749
1977 86.635 1.177821 969.403 54603 27.020 20.777 63271 42.747 162.587 164.024
1978 89.772 1324811 1.090.292 61223 30206 23.231 75.156 44.703 193555 193.185
1979 92.694 1.490173 1229.251 73.875 33.483 28448 69013 56103 220.099 220.100
1980 93902 1642.345 1349843 102009 36.761 29.660 64.557 59515 256.294 2562511981 95.396 1804.046 1486.100 140559 48.161 30.819 52933 45474 290.207 291.127
1982 95337 1917.023 1560995 157.021 52.142 34.404 49.66 58.796 283.932 284.708
Salaries and wages reported cc individual returns Include Profenoions and vocations for 1916 the tanpayers earned income rum partnershipn for 19161926 and earned incone
of the individual spouse or depeodent minors derived iron business conducted on sole proprietorship prior to 1924 For 19441960 they exclude amounts of loss than $100 per
return reported on Form w2 from which no tax wan withheld such wagon and salaries are tabulated on other income
Because of tao law changes the amounts shown for interest received may not he comparabl for each year Foe specific ye ar see the applitahie SOtreport for those asnuntn of
interest received which wore required to be reported on individual tao returns The 1981 data are for dividends received before euclusion Sen footnote fur farther information
Becauseuf too law changes the amountu shuwn for dividend income may not be comparable for each year For specific year see the applicable SOS report for thnse amounts of
dividend income ahich were required to he reported no individual tan returns Amounts shewe for 19541982 are for dividends after the euclusino amount The 1981 data are for
dividends hoforeecclusion Sue footnote for further information
t8ecaase of tan law changes the amounts shows for net capital gain lens ions may not be comparable for each year For specific year see the appltcahle iOI report fur these
amounts of oct capital gain lens less which ere required to he reported on individual tan ceturnu
Sousiness uct income lenu loss iucludes income from sole proprietorohipu and partnerships Because of tao law changes the amounts of business income from sole proprieturshipu
and partnerships say uct be comparable for each year See footnote above for further iofurmatiou on sole proprietorship and partnership income included as salaries aod wages
for 19161926 See the applicable SOt report for those amounts ef sole pruprietoeship und partnership income which were required to he reported on individual tan returns
5The total uoouut for in000e tan before credits fur few yearsdiffers nilghtly tram the tutml shuwn in the apprnprimte SOS repurt This differenre is the result uf slight
aduncnentsmade for certain general tan credits shich were added in the tan law to luwer tan liability without chauging the tan rates
Total tan liability iucluden all income tomes reported on individual emturns
Fur 1944 and 1945 the total amounts for interest and dividend incume were combined in the 505 reports nod shoun as dividend income
gecause of onetime combined iotereut and dividend exelunion iv 1981 data fnr interent and dividends are bet ore exclusion The rembined amount of interent mmd dividends
after the evclusicn was $l78097705000 reported on 31144415 returns
NOTt Detail nay nut add to total because of roendieg
84
Ficiure Figure
Average Individual Income Tax Rate 1913-1982
Major Sources of Individual Percent
Income Percent of Total 17.5F
1916 1943 and 1982
Interest
1930
Dividends
258%
223% 1913 20 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980
t..i. .i 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975
//// Year1N Itztf
BusinessOther
1930-Beginning of the Great Depression
31.8%12.0% 1943First year of tax withholding trom wages and salaries
1969Vietnam War tax surcharge
1981Economic Recovery Tax Act
1943
$106 Billion_______
taxpayers for each of the years 1975 through1978 and the 1.25 percent rate reduction credit
Other for 1981 which was the first of several tax
3.8% Capital cuts introduced by the Economic Recovery Tax
Gauns Act of 1981 The drop in the rate to 14
08% percent for 1982 reflects the first full yearDividends of the taxcutting provisions of the Act
Salaries 6%Wages ...... DATA St1JRCES
Itne0es Throughout the history of the Statistics of
Income data series for individuals the data forthe most part have been based on stratified
probability samples of unaudited individualincome tax returns The use of systematic
1982stratified sampling was introduced as early as
911 Bullthe 1925 Statistics ol Income report Its
Business use is indicated in this portion of the text
Other 2.8% excerpted from the 1925 volume
3.5% Capital Gains
1.7% .In addition fair average
Salaries Dividendssample of the returns filed by
Wages 7% persons having net income of less
81 4% than $5000 approximating 250000Interest returns are sent in to the Bureau by
81% the 64 collectors offices and are
analyzed for information bearing on
this income class the data fairly
representing the distribution of
income of all the returns filed
having net income of less than
$5000
This phenomenon of bracket creep was caused This was so far as is Iqown one of the first
by the fact that under the U.S graduated uses of stratified sampling in major Federal
system of taxation income increases intended statistical progrnto compensate workers for rising living costs The largest rumber of returns included in the
pushed taxpayers into higher tax brackets with soi sample for any one year was 1.1 million for
the result of both larger total and average tax 1948 Today with the mix of sophisticated
burdens for individuals This continued automatic data processing better statistical
increase in the average tax rate occurred techniques and recent budgetary constraints
despite several tax lowering measures such as the size of the sample has fallen to around
the general tax credit which was given to 100000 returns
85
The aggregate nunber of returns and money introduced for regular IRS processing heamounts shown in the early Statistics of Income example which should impact significantly on
reports are uidoubtedly different from those 501 processing costs and timeliness is the use
that were actually reported on all individual of online error resolution in real time
income tax returns filed These reports did environment This replaces the traditional
not contain data from deficit returns deduc laborious afterthefact checking procedurestions exceeded gross income because the which were often done without the source docu
emphasis of Statistics of Income was on net ments on handincome and whether the returns were taxable or In the area of statistical products it is
nontaxable exemptions exceeded net income expected that the focus of the SOl ProgramsData from all individuals returns filed were will move away from the more traditional annualnot includeTh SOl until 1928 and supplemental reports to broader concept
In addition prior to 1937 the income of an of user services taking advantage of less
estate or trust which yielded tax for which complicated more efficient hardware coupledthe estate or trust was liable usually income with the ever increasing variety of statistical
received while the estate was being settled or softwareincome from trust which was not yet
distributed to beneficiaries was required to AONOWLEDQvIENTS
be filed on an individual return Form 1040The tax rates were the same as for individuals This paper excerpts material which was
and separate Form 1041 was rot used for this gathered for the commemoration of the first 70
purpose until 1937 Consequently for years of the Statistics of Income SOl Program
19161936 data for individuals and estates and and which was later used as the basis for
trusts with net income were all coithined Statistics of Income Bulletin article entitled
though labelled as individual returns and w7Oth Year of Individual Income Tax Return
they were not separated in the statistics Data by David Paris and Cecelia Hilgert All
of the authors wish to express their
STATISTICAL PROCESSING OF ItOIVI0UAL appreciation to Clementine Brittain and Cathy
INCOtE TAX RETURNS Robinson for their efforts in the typing and
copy preparation of the material used for this
The processing of individual income tax paper
returns for statitical purposes has grown from
the laborious manual operation of the first NOTES AND REFERENCES
five decades to fully computerized system in
the 1980s In the context of this paper is is The American Way in Taxation Internal
worth noting some of the years in which these Revenue 18621963 ed Lillian i55Tprocedural changes were made Englewood Cliffs1.963
Electronic Accounting Machine EAM equipment Blacksin .Jack and Plowden Raywas used for SOl proccessing beginning as early Statistics of Income for Individuals
as the 1920s and in 1954 IRS working at Historical Perspective 1981 Americanthe Census Bureau first enployed computer Statistical Association Proceedingsfor their statistical work although basically Section on Survey_ Research Methods pponly for tabulations 581586
The concept of Master File transcribing See for the annual Statistics of Incometo tape most of the information supplied on the reports U.S Department of the treasurytax return was first applied to IRS processing Internal Revenue Service Statistics ofin the late 1950s and became operatonal pçprneIndividua1 Income Tax Returnsnationwise in the 1960s When the use of Publication 79 and Statistics of Incóiiautomatic data processing became operational in Corporation Income Tax Return Publication
all IRS regional service centers computer 16designation of the statistical samples Publicuse tape files available from the
commenced with the 1966 Tax Year individual Statistics of Income program includereturn SOI program Individual Tax Model for each year 1966 to
It was not until 1974 however that it was 1981 Corporation Source Book for eachconsidered practicable to use for statistical year 1965 to 1981 Estate Tax Returnspurposes data which had been recorded for 1972 and 1976 Private Foundations 1974Master File purposes Now almost 90 percent and 1979 Sole Proprietorships 1980 andof the data elements in the individual tax County Migration Data 19801981 Furtherreturn SOI program are obtained directly from details including ordering informationthe Master File with only the remaining 10 can be obtained by writing to Directorpercent separately edited Statistics of Income Division DRS
Internal Revenue Service 1111 ConstitutionNEW DIRECTIONS FR THE SOl PROGRAMS Avenue N.W Washington DC 20224
Preliminary Income Year 1983 estimates
The new directions envisioned for the SOl show that the nunber of returns being
Programs can be broadly categorized into two filed is up from the 1981 figure to 97.0
areas processing innovations and million and projections are for continued
product reshaping growthWith respect to processing the SOl Programs The nunber of exemptions claimed on tax
are utilizing as fast as practicable the returns gives count of the nuirber of
improved systems equipment and operations being individuals actually covered by the tax
86
filing system There are however some Bureaj of Economic Analysis The National
adjustments that have to be made to the Income and Product Accounts oFtDTtnurrer of exemptions to compensate for Sttes 9276 5epthæ5I 11iSurveyover and undercounting of individuals of Current Business July 1982These include subtraction of the extra U.S Departmenrf Commerce Bureau of
exemptions for age and blindness Economic Analysis Business Conditions
elimination of duplicate counting of Digest November 1983dependents with unearned income and For selected years 19231933 1943adjustments to compensate for overcounting 19751978 and 1981 the total amount forof certain deceased taxpayers dependents income tax before credits shown in this
with earned income and dependents of paper differs slightly from the totaldivorced tax return filers For more shown in the appropriate SQl report Thisinformation on comparability of Census difference is the result of the slightPopulation information with tax record adjustments made for certain general taxinformation see for example Alvey Wendy credits which were added to the tax law inand Scheuren Fritz Background for an order to lower tax liability withoutAdministrative Record Census 1982 changing the tax ratesAmerican Statistical Association Pro The average individual income tax rate is
defined as the ratio of total income to
general a1lowaEI deducEi1ncluded income tax before credits Income tax
but were not limited to such items as before credits is the focus in thisinterest paid taxes paid contributions article rather than income tax afterlosses from fires and storms and bad
credits because of the desire to look atdebts See the applicable SOl report for the impact of the differing rates overthose deductions allowable in specific time The general pattern shown in this
year article would however be little changed ifFor each Tax Year the total income figure the calculations had been made with income
computed for the year was derived from the tax after credits instead Total tax
data shown in the applicable SOl report liability as shown in Table includes
This was accomplished by adding the not only income tax after credits but also
positive amounts of income less the net additional tax for tax preferencesloss amounts of income The total amount selfemployment taxes etcof ret income shown in the SOl reports U.S Department of the Treasury Internal
prior to 1944 differs from the total Revenue Service Statistics of Incomeincome amount for the same years shown in 1925 pagethis article In the original SQl reports For further information on the 1982 sampleprior to 1944 allowable deductions were see U.S Department of the Treasurysubtracted from the total income in Internal Revenue Service Statistics of
arriving at ret income These deductions Incomel982 Individual Income Tax
are discussed in note above tjrns 1984In addition the total aiwunt of It is assured that the data in this paper
adjusted gross income AGI shown in theare impacted to negligible degree by the
SOl reports since 1944 also differs from absense of deficit returns prior to 1928the total inome amount shown in this and the presence of fiduciary returnsarticle In the reports since 1944
prior to 1937 The nuiiber of deficitstatutory adjustments were subtracted from returns filed for 1928 for example wastotal income in arriving at AGI Statutory only 1.8 percent of the total Fiduciaryadjustments include but are not limited
returns with net income for 1937
to such items as the mving expense represented about 1.2 percent of theadjustment employee business expenses and
corrbined nunber of individual andthe sick pay exclusion See the
fiduciary returns
applicable SQl report for those statutory Duncan Joseph and elton Williamadjustments allowable in specific year Revolution in Lkited States GovernmentThe adjustment used was the implicit price St1stics 19261976 U.S Department ofdeflator for personal consuiiption expendi Commerce Office of Federal Statisticaltures See U.S Department of Commerce Policy and Standards 1978
87