Upload
cathleen-booker
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IN SUPPORT OF THE CREATION OF AVENUES FOR STUDENTS TO
REPORT ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
Senate Resolution 1005
Background
The Student Judicial Services (SJS) is the administrative body that carries out investigation of alleged violations of academic integrity
Academic dishonesty is “any act designed to give an unfair or undeserved academic advantage” Source: SJS website
Currently, faculty members are primarily responsible for reporting academic dishonesty
Issues with the Current Process
Students limited to reporting academic dishonesty only to their professor
Faculty are only allowed to report academic dishonesty to SJS
Not all faculty members properly report cases of academic dishonesty to SJS
Students are allowed to report non-academic violations to SJS
Purpose
To provide students with a formal outlet to report academic dishonesty observed amongst their peers
Students should be able to bring to the attention of SJS observed cases of academic dishonesty among one another without having to go through a faculty intermediary
Whereas Summary
Recommendation Eleven of the Commission of 125 Report states that “it is vital that students help set and maintain standards of excellence at their own university.” Also states that “every student, faculty member,
and staff member should assume individual responsibility for upholding the reputation, values, and academic integrity of the university.”
Whereas Summary (continued)
Several comparison schools such as Ohio State University and Baylor University emphasize the importance of, and provide a formal outlet for, direct student reporting of academic dishonesty.
SJS will take appropriate action against any student who fails to act with integrity in the process of reporting a case of academic dishonesty.
Resolved Summary
SJS should formalize student involvement in the discipline process for academic integrity violations by creating a student reporting form.
Advisors and advising bodies should act as optional intermediaries in the student initiated reporting process.
The Faculty Council and other representative bodies of the teaching staff should emphasize the importance of reporting cases involving academic dishonesty. And in effect guide those students who have violated
academic integrity to develop a personal character with better integrity
Resolved Summary (continued)
SJS processes and files incident
Faculty is
informed
Faculty disposition
Administrative
disposition
Report filed
Student witnesses academic dishonesty
Student witnesses
unfair treatment or faculty
not following procedure
Student experiences bad testing environmen
t
Some colleges /
programs have their own
forms
Student talks to advisor
or counsel
or
Talks to class
professor or
TA/AI
Student has
options
Resolved Summary (continued)
Student Reporting Form
(Online or Paper version)
SJS processes and files incident
Faculty is
informed
Faculty disposition
Administrative
disposition
Report filed
Student witnesses academic dishonesty
Student witnesses
unfair treatment or faculty
not following procedure
Student experiences bad testing environmen
t
Logs on SJS
website
Goes to SJS office
Some colleges /
programs have their own
forms
Student talks to advisor
or counsel
or
Talks to class
professor or
TA/AI
Student has MORE
options
Advisor knows more
options
MORE
With more reports, it is easier to
identify repeat
offenders