In-Situ Hybridisation

  • Upload
    emqueen

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    1/11

    In-Situ Hybridisation

    In-Situ Hybridisation 1

    Detection of Digoxigenin and Biotin Labelled DNA Probes

    Using an Immunogold Silver Staining Technique

    Numerous non-isotopic systems have now been developed to visualise

    labelled gene probes. Antibody based detection methods have proved to be as

    sensitive as isotopic labels and provide a suitable alternative for routine in-situ

    hybridisation procedures. The use of digoxigenin and biotin labelled DNAprobes coupled with an antibody-enzyme detection method has been shown

    to be a useful means of detecting genes and gene expression by in-situ

    hybridisation. Here we describe the applications of an alternative detection

    system using immunogold conjugates.

    In-Situ Hybridisation For Light Microscope

    1. Paraffin wax embedded sections were heat fixed onto 3-

    aminopropyltriethoxysilane coated slides.2. Sections were de-waxed in xylene (2 x 15 min),re-hydrated through 100%,

    70% ethanol and finally washed in deionised water.

    3. Pre-treatments included hydrolysis in 0.05M HCl for 10 min followed by

    digestion with 20 g/ml proteinase K (in 20mM Tris, 2mM CaCl pH 7.5) for 30

    min at 37C. A proteinase titration experiment is necessary for each particular

    tissue block to determine optimum digestion conditions.

    4. After digestion, sections were washed in l times TBS (0.1M Tris-Cl, 0.15M

    NaCl, pH 8.2), post-fixed in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde for five

    minutes, and returned to l times TBS.

    5. Sections were placed in pre-hybridisation buffer (50% formamide, 5x

    Denhardt's solution, 2x SSC, calf thymus DNA) at 37C for 30 minutes.

    6.Double stranded DNA probes were labelled by the multi-prime technique

    using commercially available biot in (Vector Labs Inc) and digoxigenin (Roche

    Diagnostics) labelling kits. Labelled probe was diluted in hybridisation buffer

    (table 1) to between 0.1-0.5 g/ml and applied to section in 10l volume under

    a sealed cover slip or under a square of paraffin film.

    7. Sections were placed in a moist chamber (Terasaki plate) and probe and

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    2/11

    target DNA were heat denatured simultaneously in an oven at 90C for 10 min.

    Hybridisation was carried out overnight at 42C in a moist chamber.

    8. Cover slips were removed by soaking slides in 2x SSC containing 0.1%

    Tween20.

    9. Post-hybridisation washes included, 2x SSC at 20C for 10 min, 2x SSC at

    42C for 10 min and twice in 0.5x SSC at 42C for 10 min. Sections were then

    equilibrated in lx TBS (0.1M Tris, 0.15M NaCl, pH 8.20).

    Detection Of Hybrids With Gold Labelled Antibody

    1. After hybridisation sections were blocked in either 5% BSA, 5% normal

    sheep serum, or 1% casein, in l times TBS containing 0.1% Tween20, for 1

    hour at room temperature.

    2. Blocking solution was shaken off and Sheep antiDigoxigenin or Goat anti-

    Biotin polyclonal gold conjugates, diluted 1/100 in either 1% BSA or 0.1%

    casein in l times TBS containing 0.1% Tween20 were applied to the section

    and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature.

    3. Sections were washed thoroughly in lx TBS to remove excess antibody.

    4. Sections labelled with gold conjugates were washed 5 x 1min in deionised

    water.

    5. Gold particles were visualised using silver enhancer for approximately 20

    min, or until sections appeared optimally developed under light microscope

    control. The reaction was stopped by rinsing sections with water.

    Pre-Hybridisation Buffer

    Item Concentration Volume l/ml Working

    Formamide1 500 50%

    100x Denhardts2 50 5x

    20x SSC3 100 2x

    10 mg/ml calf thymus DNA 20 200 g/ml

    De-ionised water 30

    Probe DNA Upto 300 200 ng/ml

    1. Formamide is a teratogen. Handle with extreme care and wear gloves. Todeionise formamide, add 200 ml formamide to 10g of Amberlite MB-3 resin(Sigma). Stir for 1 hour at room temperature. Filter through Whatman No.1 filterpaper to remove the resin. Store at 4C in a dark bott le.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    3/11

    2. 100x Denhardt's solution is 2% Ficoll (mw 400,000), 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone (mw 400,000) and 2% heat treated BSA. Store at 20C.

    3. 1x SSC is 0.l5M NaCl, 0.015M tri-sodium citrate, pH 7.0. Sterilised byautoclaving.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    4/11

    In-situ Hybridisation 2

    Detection of mRNA with Oligonucleotide Probes using an Immunogold Silver

    Stain Technique

    Short single-stranded oligonucleotide probes are now easily synthesized,

    penetrate tissue sections better than larger double-stranded DNA or RNA

    probes and can be readily detected with the use of non-isotopic labels. Here

    we describe the application of an immunogold antibody detection system to

    visualise digoxigenin end labelled oligonucleotide probes.

    The gold/silver reaction obtained is viewed as an intense black signal using

    bright field microscopy or as a brilliant reflected image under epipolarised

    illumination. The reaction product does not fade, is compatible with most

    counter stains and mounting agents and individual gold/silver enhanced

    particles can be counted under high power magnification to give a quantitative

    estimation of gene expression.

    Probe Labelling

    Probes were labelled at the 3'end using a terminal transferase. The reaction

    was carried out as follows:

    1. Mix on ice; 5 times tailing reaction buffer (concentrated reaction buffer is

    usually supplied from the manufacturer with the terminal transferase), 5 nmol

    digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim), 2 nmol dCTP (Pharmacia), and

    30-50 units terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Gibco BRL). The volume

    was made up to 50 l with sterile deionised water.2. Reaction was incubated at 37C for upto 1 hour.

    3. Reaction was stopped with addition of 10l EDTA (0.25M pH8) and placed

    on ice.

    4. Tailed probe was recovered by adding; 10g tRNA, 6l 3M sodium acetate

    (pH 6.0) and 150l ice cold ethanol, to the reaction mix and incubating at -20C

    for at least 2 hours. The DNA was then pelleted by centrifugation at 120000g in

    a micro-centrifuge for 10 min. After carefully removing the supernatant the

    pellet was dried under vacuum and re-dissolved in 50l of sterile deionised

    water and stored at -20C.

    Pre-Hybridisation Treatment of Tissue Section

    1. Paraffin wax embedded sections were heat fixed onto 3-

    aminopropyltriethoxysilane coated slides.

    2. Sections were de-waxed in xylene (2 x 15 min), rehydrated through 100%

    and 70% ethanol and finally washed in deionised water.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    5/11

    3. Pre-treatments included:

    i) Hydrolysis in 0.2M HCl for 10 min.

    ii) 0.3% Triton X-100 in l times TBS (0.1M Tris, 0.15M NaCl, pH8.2) for 15 min.

    iii) Digestion with proteinase K (Sigma) in 0.lM Tris, 50mM EDTA, pH 8 for 30

    min at 37C. (NB. Proteinase concentration is crit ical and a titration experiment

    is necessary for each particular tissue block. Usually between 0-20g/ml is

    optimal).

    iv) 0.2% glycine for 1 min.

    v) Post-fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min.

    vi) 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1M triethanolamine (pH 7.5) for 10 min.

    (NB. Sections were washed briefly in l times TBS between each pre-treatment).

    4. Sections were placed in pre-hybridisation buffer for 1 hour.

    Item Volume l in 1ml

    De-ionised Formamide1 500

    100x Denhardts2 10

    20x SSC3 100

    Denatured Calf Thymus DNA (10 mg/ml) 25

    Dextran Sulphate 200

    SDS (10%) 50

    Tris (0.5M, pH7.5) 20

    De-ionised Sterile Water 95

    Hybridisation

    1. Excess pre-hybridisation buffer was carefully removed from around sectionand 20 l of pre-hybridisation buffer, containing between 10-100 ng (0.5-5g/ml) of digoxigenin labelled oligonucleotide, was applied.

    2. Hybridisation solution was covered with a small square of paraffin film andincubated in a sealed humid container (Terasaki plate) at 42C for 18 hours.

    3. Paraffin film was removed by soaking in 2x SSC.

    4. Post-hybridisation washes to remove non-specifically bound probe DNAincluded: two changes of 2x SSC, 10 min each at 42C followed by twochanges of 0.1x SSC, 20 min each at 42C.

    5. Finally sections were equilibrated in 1x TBS.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    6/11

    Detection of Hybrids with Gold Labelled Antibody

    1. After post-hybridisation washes sections were blocked with 1% casein in lxTBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 hour at 20C.

    2. Blocking solution was shaken off and Sheep anti-Digoxigenin goldconjugate, diluted 1/100 in 0.1-0.5% casein, lx TBS, 0.1% Tween 20 wasapplied to the section and incubated for at least 2 hours.

    3. Sections were washed thoroughly in lx TBS to remove excess antibody andfinally rinsed 5x 1min in deionised water.

    4. Gold particles were visualised using silver enhancer, for approximately 20min or until the sections appeared optimally developed under light microscopecontrol. The reaction was stopped by rinsing in water for 1 min.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    7/11

    In-situ Hybridisation 3

    Some Practical Hints into the Technique of in-situ Hybridisation

    in-situ hybridisation (ISH) is the only technique that enables the morphological

    demonstration of specific DNA and RNA sequences in individual cells of tissue

    sections and cytospins and in chromosomal preparations. The development of

    non-isotopic DNA labelling techniques has enabled ISH to become a routine

    procedure in many research and clinical laboratories.

    However, although optimal conditions have been developed for DNA and RNA

    hybridisation on solid supports, the use of tissue sections or cell preparations

    present additional problems, such as non-specific binding, sensitivity of signal

    detection and target accessibility. Here we describe some useful tips that are

    not always apparent in scientific publications.

    Contents

    1. Tissue Treatment

    2. Slide Handling

    3. Tissue Permeabilisation

    4. Background

    5. Controls for Hybridisation

    6. Probe Concentration

    7. The use of Gold Conjugates for in-situ Hybridisation

    1. Tissue Treatment

    Fixatives

    Fixation is aimed at preserving cell morphology and the nucleic acid, especially

    RNA sequences, composition of tissue whilst allowing adequate probe

    penetration during hybridisation. The aldehyde fixatives, paraformaldehyde and

    glutaraldehyde, promote cross linking of proteins and provide better RNAretention and morphology than the precipitating fixatives such as Bouin's and

    Carnoy's fluid. We have found that the use of Bouin's fixative greatly reduced

    the level of RNA detection in sections.

    Fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde is a popular compromise between

    permeability and RNA retention. Make solution by dissolving 4g of

    paraformaldehyde in 100ml of PBS by warming the mixture to 60C for 30 min

    in a fume hood, (NB. Paraformaldehyde is a carcinogen). Allow solution to cool

    and filter through Whatman #l paper before use. Always make fresh solution on

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    8/11

    same day. Tissue is usually fixed for up to 18 hours by immersion.

    2. Slide Handling

    Slide Coating

    It is now widely accepted that the most efficient and convenient method ofadhering tissue sections to glass slides is the use of 3-

    aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS).

    (a) Clean slides are dipped in a solution of 2% APS in acetone for 5 min.

    (b) Immerse slides in deionised water for 2 x 5 min.

    (c) Leave to air dry or warm at 37C. When completely dry store in boxes at

    room temperature.

    Slide Incubations

    During the hybridisation process it is crucial that at no stage should the tissue

    section be allowed to dry out We have found that two slides placed in a

    Terasaki plate containing a small volume of water and placed in a humid

    container (sandwich box) efficiently retains the hybridisation volume during the

    overnight incubations at temperatures up to 42C.

    The sections were also covered with a small square of paraffin film (just large

    enough to cover section). Care was taken to avoid air bubbles. This procedure

    avoids the tedious process of sealing coverslips with rubber solution.

    When denaturation of target DNA was necessary the same apparatus was

    used, the Terasaki plate containing the slides was placed on a preheated metal

    plate in an oven at 95C for 10 minutes.

    3. Tissue Permeabilisation

    Permeabilisation is necessary to enable accessibility of the probe target

    DNA/mRNA. This stage of ISH is critical to obtaining maximum signal to

    background ratio and must be optimised for each particular tissue block or cellpreparation. For instance, heavily cross-linked tissue will require extensive

    permeabilisation.

    This treatment typically involves exposure to dilute acids, detergents, alcohols,

    and proteases such as proteinase K, pronase, or pepsin. A common

    permeabilisation procedure would include;

    (a) Hydrolysis in 0.2 M HCl for 10 min.

    (b) 0.3% Triton X-l00 in 1 x TBS (0.lM Tris, 0.15M NaCl, pH 8.2) for 15 min.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    9/11

    (c) Digestion with proteinase K in 0.1M Tris, 50mM EDTA, pH8.0 for 30 min at

    37C. This step is crit ical and a titration experiment is necessary to determine

    the optimal amount of proteinase required, too little results in a poor signal and

    too much can result in high background and poor tissue morphology. Usually

    somewhere between 1-20 g/ml is appropriate.

    (d) Retention of tissue morphology in the subsequent hybridisation procedure

    is maintained by a post-fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min.

    4.Background

    Reduction of background during hybridisation.

    Non-specific background is mainly due to retention of probe in tissue sections

    by physical entrapment and electrostatic actions among charged groups. To

    decrease tissue "stickiness", a pre-hybridisation incubation was performedwhich was intended to saturate sites in the tissue that might otherwise bind

    nucleic acids un-specifically. Pre-hybridisation buffer contains all the

    components of the hybridisation buffer except the probe DNA. Pre-

    hybridisation was usually performed for 1 hour at 37C, the solution was then

    drained off and hybridisation buffer was applied directly onto the moist section.

    Electrostatic attraction between probe and basic proteins can be reduced by

    pre-treatment of sections with 0.25% Acetic Anhydride in 0.lM Triethanolamine

    (pH 7.5) for 5 min, which blocks basic groups by acetylation.

    Reduction of background during non-isotopic detection

    The majority of non-isotopic detection systems rely on the use of a conjugated

    antibody specific to a hapten labelled DNA/RNA probe. We have obtained our

    best results using digoxigenin labelled DNA and detecting hybrids using a

    Sheep anti-Digoxigenin gold conjugated antibody.

    Non-specific antibody binding results from attraction to charged groups within

    the section. Unfortunately these groups are further revealed by the proteinase

    treatment prior to hybridisation. Also certain tissues types and even areas

    within tissues are more prone to non-specific by charge attraction such asconnective tissue, cell membranes and nuclear proteins.

    We found the most effective blocking regime to be incubation in 0.5-1% casein

    in 1 x TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 hour. The antibody was diluted in

    0.1% casein, 1 x TBS, 0.1% Tween 20 and applied to section for 2 hours.

    (Casein forms negatively charged micelles, which effectively saturate positively

    charged groups in the tissue).

    When a double layer antibody detection step was being used, the washes

    between the primary and secondary antibodies were performed with solutions

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    10/11

    containing blocking reagents.

    5. Controls for Hybridisation

    The possibility of non-specific probe and antibody attraction emphasizes the

    need for adequate controls to be performed. Some useful controls would

    include:

    1. Sections processed as normal but in the absence of labelled probe.

    2. Sections hybridised with a non-specific or irrelevant labelled probe, e.g.

    vector DNA or sense oligonucleotide probe.

    3. During RNA detection one section can be subjected to RNAse A treatment

    (100-200 g/ml in 2 x SSC for 2 hours at 37C) before hybridisation (N.B. it is

    important that RNAse does not contaminate any of the incubations).

    4. An initial hybridisation can be carried out with unlabelled probe in excess

    followed by incubation with labelled probe.

    6. Probe Concentration

    Optimal probe concentration is difficult to predict however it is best to use the

    lowest concentration required to saturate target nucleic acids. In our

    experience the concentration for multi-primed or nick translated DNA probes

    ranges from 0.1-0.5g/ml and for end labelled oligonuleotide between 0.5-

    5.0g/ml. Preliminary experiments are necessary to determine the optimal

    signal to noise ratio.

    Estimation of oligonucleotide DNA concentrationA typical 0.25 mole synthesis will yield between 50 and 150 nmol of full-length

    oligonucleotide. Oligonucleotide concentration is usually reported in

    absorbance units at 260nm that can be converted into molar units by assumingthat 1 A260 unit = 33 g of oligonucleotide.

    For example, a 24 mer oligonucleotide has an A260 of 0.2 when diluted 1/200.

    x 33 g x 200 (dilution factor) = 1.3 mg/ml

    - (oligo length x 330 g/mol) = 0.16 mol

    x 1,000 nmol/mol = 160 nmol

    Before using any labelled probe an estimate of its sensitivity should be made

    using a dot blot hybridisation technique. This involves blotting dilutions of

    target DNA or RNA onto a membrane and hybridising with a known

    concentration of probe. Sometimes target DNA is not readily available and a

    direct blot of the probe can be made to assess efficiency of labelling.

  • 8/6/2019 In-Situ Hybridisation

    11/11

    7. The use of Gold Conjugates for in-situ Hybridisation

    Gold conjugated antibodies have been used extensively for immunohistological

    labelling of cells and tissue sections. Now gold conjugates, along with enzyme

    and fluorescent labelled antibodies, in combination with non-radioactively

    labelled DNA and RNA probes are rapidly replacing the use of radioactively

    labelled probes for in-situ hybridisation. Gold conjugates provide a number of

    important benefits to the technique of in-situ hybridisation.1. A very distinct signal is obtained. This is viewed as an intense black reaction

    using bright field microscopy or as a brilliant reflective image under

    epipolarised illumination. Other labels, such as enzymes, can result in diffuse

    signals that may be misleading.

    2. Silver enhancement is rapid. Maximum sensitivity is obtained after 20-30

    min.

    3. The signal is enhanced further (approximately 10 fold) using epipolarizing

    illumination. This also provides a spectacular light microscope image of the

    labelled section.

    4. The signal is insoluble in most laboratory dehydrating and mounting agents,

    does not fade with time and is compatible with a wide variety of counter stains.

    5. There is no interference from endogenous enzyme activity.

    6. Hybridisation studies can be further investigated at the electron microscope

    level. Various sizes of gold particles are available for multiple labelling.

    7. Individual gold particles can be counted in the electron microscope to give a

    quantitative estimation of gene expression or gene copy number. It is also

    possible to count individual gold/silver enhanced particles using high power

    magnification in the light microscope.

    Publications

    In-situ HYBRIDISATION - Principles and practice

    PolakJM and McGee J (1992)

    DNA PROBES

    Keller G and Manak M (1992)

    In-situ HYBRIDISATION A practical approachDG Wilkinson (1995)

    In-situ HYBRIDISATION A practical guide

    Leitch AR et al (1994)