25
In Pursuit of High Value Health Care Shari M. Ling, MD Deputy Chief Medical Officer Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CAP Policy Meeting 7 May 2013

In Pursuit of High Value Health Care

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

In Pursuit of High Value

Health Care

Shari M. Ling, MD

Deputy Chief Medical Officer

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

CAP Policy Meeting

7 May 2013

2

CMS Vision

CMS is a major force and a

trustworthy partner for the

continual improvement of health

and health care for all

Americans.

3

Size and Scope of

CMS Responsibilities

CMS is the largest purchaser of health care in the world.

Combined, Medicare and Medicaid pay approximately

one-third of national health expenditures (approx $800B)

CMS programs currently provide health care coverage

to roughly 105 million beneficiaries in Medicare,

Medicaid and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance

Program); or roughly 1 in every 3 Americans

Millions of consumers will receive health care coverage

through new health insurance programs authorized in

the Affordable Care Act

4

National Quality Strategy promotes

better health, healthcare, and lower cost

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires the

Secretary of the Department of Health and Human

Services (HHS) to establish a national strategy that

will improve:

The delivery of health care services

Patient health outcomes

Population health

The strategy is to concurrently pursue

three aims

5

Better Care Improve overall quality by making health care more patient-centered, reliable, accessible and safe.

Healthy People /

Healthy Communities

Improve population health by supporting proven interventions to address behavioral, social and environmental determinants of health, in addition to delivering higher-quality care.

Affordable Care Reduce the cost of quality health care for individuals, families, employers and government.

And focus on six priorities

1) Making care safer by reducing harm caused in the delivery of care

2) Ensuring that each person and family are engaged as partners in their care

3) Promoting effective communication and coordination of care

4) Promoting the most effective prevention and treatment practices for the

leading causes of mortality, starting with cardiovascular disease

5) Working with communities to promote wide use of best practices to enable

healthy living

6) Making quality care more affordable for individuals, families, employers,

and governments by developing and spreading new health care delivery

models

6

7

CMS Measurement Framework

Maps to the

National Quality Strategy Priorities

• Measures should

be patient-

centered and

outcome-oriented

whenever

possible

• Measure concepts

in each of the six

domains that are

common across

providers and

settings can form

a core set of

measures

Person- and Caregiver-

centered experience and

outcomes

•CAHPS or equivalent

measures for each

settings

•Functional outcomes

Efficiency and cost

reduction

•Spend per beneficiary

measures

•Episode cost measures

•Quality to cost

measures

Care Coordination

•Transition of care

measures

•Admission and

readmission measures

•Other measures of

care coordination

Clinical Care

•HHS primary care and

CV quality measures

•Prevention measures

•Setting-specific

measures

•Specialty-specific

measures

Population &

Community Health

•Measures that assess

health of the community

•Measures that reduce

health disparities

•Access to care and

equitability measures

Safety

•HCACs, including

HAIs

•All cause harm

8

Quality can be measured and improved at multiple levels

•Three levels of measurement critical to achieving three aims of National Quality Strategy •Measure concepts should “roll up” to align quality improvement objectives at all levels •Patient-centric, outcomes oriented measures preferred at all three levels •The six domains can be measured at each of the three levels

Inc

rea

sin

g in

div

idu

al a

cc

ou

nta

bilit

y

Incre

asin

g c

om

mo

nali

ty a

mo

ng

pro

vid

ers

Community

Practice setting

Individual physician/EP

•Population-based denominator •Multiple ways to define denominator, e.g., county, HRR •Applicable to all providers

•Denominator based on practice setting, e.g., hospital, group practice

•Denominator bound by patients cared for •Applies to all physicians/EPs

9

Quality Reporting Towards

Value-Based Purchasing

2011

• ACA, HITECH

• 190 individual

measures

• 14 Measures

Groups

• eRx

• Individual

Reporting via

Claims, Registry, or

EHRs

• GPRO I

• GPRO II

•Maintenance of

Certification

Program Incentive

2007

• TRHCA

• 74

measures

• Claims-

based

reporting

only

2008

• MMSEA

• 119

measures

• 4 Measures

Groups

• Reporting via

Claims or

Registry

2009

• MIPPA

• 153 individual

measures

• 7 Measures

Groups

• eRx

• Reporting via

Claims or

Registry

• EHR-testing

VBP

2010

• MIPPA

• 179 individual

measures

• 13 Measures

Groups

• eRx

• Individual

Reporting via

Claims, Registry,

or EHRs

• Group reporting

option (GPRO)

2012 2013

• ACA, HITECH 13 participation options

• 210 individual measures 258 measures

• 22 Measures Groups

• eRx

• Individual Reporting via Claims, Registry,

or EHRs

• Single GPRO for groups with at least 25

eligible professionals

• Incentive payments for PQRS, GPRO, and

eRx reporting

•Payment Adjustments for non-successful

eRx reporters

•Maintenance of Certification Program

Incentive

10

PQRS Program Overview

PQRS is a Medicare Part B reporting program that uses a

combination of incentive payments and payment adjustments to

promote reporting of PFS quality information by eligible

professionals, or group practices participating in GPRO The applicable PQRS incentive amounts are:

1.5% for 2007 1.0% for 2011

1.5% for 2008 0.5% for 2012

2.0% for 2009 0.5% for 2013

2.0% for 2010 0.5% for 2014

The applicable PQRS payment adjustment amounts are:

1.5% in 2015

2.0% in 2016

The 2013 PFS Final Rule sets forth requirements for the PQRS

incentive payment, and for the 2015 PQRS payment adjustments

No PQRS incentive payments are scheduled past 2014

11

Pathology Participation

Percentage of eligible professionals participating in PQRS has increased each year

4,539 in 2009 (58.9% of eligible)

4,749 in 2010 (61.5% of eligible)

4,829 in 2011 (63.2% of eligible)

12

How to Participate in 2013

13

Avoiding the 2015 1.5%

PQRS Payment Adjustment For services provided through 12/31/13, must report by 2/28/14:

Report Satisfactory for 2013 PQRS Incentive Payment, OR

http://cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-

Instruments/PQRS/Downloads/2013MLNSE13__AvoidingPQRSPaymentAdjustme

nt_020113.pdf

Report one valid measure or one valid measures group for one

Medicare Part B beneficiary, OR

Elect the administrative claims reporting mechanism (reference the

Value-Based Payment Modifier website for upcoming details about

the election process)

◊ Admin claims election (likely occur between 7/15 and 10/15/13)

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-

Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/ValueBasedPaymentModifier.html

Participate now!

14

Relevant 2013 Measures

PQRS #99/NQF #0391: Breast Cancer Resection Pathology

Reporting: Breast Cancer Resection Pathology Reporting: pT

Category (Primary Tumor) and pN Category (Regional Lymph

Nodes) with Histologic Grade Percentage of breast cancer resection pathology reports that include the pT category

(primary tumor), the pN category (regional lymph nodes), and the histologic grade

◊ Reporting options: Claims, Registry

PQRS #100/NQF #0392: Colorectal Cancer Resection Pathology

Reporting: pT Category (Primary Tumor) and pN Category

(Regional Lymph Nodes) with Histologic Grade Percentage of colon and rectum cancer resection pathology reports that include the pT

category (primary tumor), the pN category (regional lymph nodes) and the histologic

grade

◊ Reporting options: Claims, Registry

15

Relevant 2013 Measures (cont.)

PQRS #249: Barrett's Esophagus Percentage of esophageal biopsy reports that document the presence of Barrett’s mucosa

that also include a statement about dysplasia

◊ Reporting options: Claims, Registry

PQRS #250: Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Reporting Percentage of radical prostatectomy pathology reports that include the pT category, the

pN category, the Gleason score and a statement about margin status

◊ Reporting options: Claims, Registry

PQRS #251: Immunohistochemical (IHC) Evaluation of Human

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing (HER2) for Breast

Cancer Patients This is a measure based on whether quantitative evaluation of Human Epidermal Growth

Factor Receptor 2 Testing (HER2) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) uses the system

recommended in the ASCO/CAP Guidelines for Human Epidermal Growth Factor

Receptor 2 Testing in breast cancer

◊ Reporting options: Claims, Registry

16

PQRS, Value-Modifier, & the Medicare EHR

Incentive Program (MU) Incentive & Payment

Adjustment Timelines

PQRS Incentive: ends in 2014

PQRS Payment Adjustment: starts in 2013 (affects 2015

payment); overlaps with the incentive for 2 years

Value-Modifier: first reporting year is 2013; affects

payment in 2015

Must include all providers by payment year 2017

(measurement year 2015)

17

Definition and Purpose

Value-based purchasing is a tool that allows

CMS to link the National Quality Strategy with

fee-for-service payments at a national scale.

It is an important driver in revamping how

services are paid for, moving increasingly

toward rewarding providers and health systems

that deliver better outcomes in health and health

care at lower cost to the beneficiaries and

communities they serve.

VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-Based Purchasing – National Programs to

Move from Volume to Value. NEJM July 26, 2012 18

Value-Based Purchasing

• Goal is to reward providers and health systems that

deliver better outcomes in health and health care at lower

cost to the beneficiaries and communities they serve.

• Five Principles

- Define the end goal, not the process for achieving it

- All providers’ incentives must be aligned

- Right measure must be developed and implemented in

rapid cycle

- CMS must actively support quality improvement

- Clinical community and patients must be actively

engaged

19

What is the Value-Based

Modifier? • The Affordable Care Act requires that Medicare phase in a value-based

payment modifier (VM) that would apply to Medicare Fee for Service

Payments starting in 2015; phase-in complete by 2017

• The VM assesses both quality of care furnished and the cost of that care

• The Value-based Payment Modifier aligns with PQRS

• The proposals

• Encourage physician measurement and alignment with PQRS

• Offer choice of quality measures and reporting mechanisms

• Focus payments on outliers in the first year

• Provide actionable information

• Challenging and complex program

• Must be budget neutral

Value-based modifier links quality with

physician payment

•Physician Feedback/Value-Based Modifier Program provides

comparative performance information to physicians

•Objective is to align quality measurement and incentives across

programs and care settings to establish common goals for quality

improvement and shared accountability for performance

•Two primary components of the program:

•Reports–provided to participating physicians since 2009;

beginning in 2015 and beyond, for physicians who will be

impacted by the VBPM, the QRURs will contain composite

measures of quality and cost that display the bases for the VBPM

•Value-based Payment Modifier–Starting in 2015, some

physicians' payments by Medicare will be affected by application

of the VBPM; by 2017, most physicians paid under the MPFS will

see the VBPM applied to claims they submit to Medicare

21

PQRS and the Value Modifier

Beginning in 2013, group practices consisting of 100+ eligible

professionals, will be subject to the Value-based Payment Modifier

We finalized applying the VM to physician payment in all

groups of 100 or more eligible professionals (EPs) starting

in 2015

A group practice with 100 or more eligible professionals may

avoid a 2015 VBM downward payment adjustment by self-

nominating for the PQRS as a group and reporting at least one

measure

A group practice is defined as a single Taxpayer Identification

Number (TIN)

Note: The 2015 and 2016 Value-based payment modifier does

not apply to groups that are ACOs or ACO participants

Value-Based Purchasing Program Objectives

over Time Towards Attainment of the

Three-part Aim

Initial

programs

FY2012-2013

Proposed and near-term

programs

FY2014-2016

Longer-term FY2017+

•Limited to hospitals (HVBP)

and dialysis facilities (QIP)

•Existing measures providers

recognize and understand

•Focus on provider

awareness, participation,

and engagement

•Expand to include physicians

•New measures to address

HHS priorities

•Increasing emphasis on

patient experience, cost, and

clinical outcomes

•Increasing provider

engagement to drive quality

improvements, e.g., learning

and action networks

•VBP measures and incentives

aligned across multiple settings

of care and at various levels of

aggregation (individual

physician, facility, health

system)

•Measures are patient-centered

and outcome oriented

•Measure set addresses all 6

national priorities well

•Rapid cycle measure

development and

implementation

•Continued support of QI and

engagement of clinical

community and patients

•Greater share of payment

linked to quality Vision for VBP

23

Contact Information

Dr. Shari Ling

CMS Deputy Chief Medical Officer

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality

410-786-6841

[email protected]

24

Resources

CMS PQRS Website

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-

Instruments/PQRS

CMS Value-Based Payment Modifier http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-

Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram/ValueBasedPaymentModifier.html

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms

Portal and Communication Support Page

https://www.qualitynet.org/portal/server.pt/community/pqri_home/212

FFS Provider Listserv

https://list.nih.gov/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A0=PHYSICIANS-L

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

https://questions.cms.gov/

25

Where to Call for Help

QualityNet Help Desk: Portal password issues

PQRS/eRx feedback report availability and access

IACS registration questions

IACS login issues

PQRS and eRx Incentive Program questions

866-288-8912 (TTY 877-715-6222) 7:00 a.m.–7:00 p.m. CST M-F

[email protected] You will be asked to provide basic information such as name, practice, address, phone, and e-

mail

EHR Incentive Program Information Center:

Medicare/Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

888-734-6433 (TTY 888-734-6563)

Value-based Payment Modifier:

FFS Physician Feedback Program/Value-based Payment Modifier

[email protected]