33
ous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear), ed on balance and visual/auditory perception. t we learned in the last lecture, seem proprioception plays some role in balance – a role does proprioception play in this context? a loss of proprioception not affect more muscles, mouth muscle movements or voluntary eye movements. Are there different cies that would cause facial muscle control loss? the load force maximize before the object lifts off the surface? Is it beca cles have to maximize as much effort as they will need for the of the lift just to get the object off the surface? that there is a particular section of the brain that is particularly sensiti ing faces. Let's suppose two people have the same sensitivity to faces, is very bad at putting a name to the face, whereas er has no trouble. Does this have something to do with between the visual (facial) area and memory areas, a problem of attention (the person did not attend well o the name of the person), or something else?

In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

  • Upload
    padma

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear), we touched on balance and visual/auditory perception. From what we learned in the last lecture, it would seem proprioception plays some role in balance – how big a role does proprioception play in this context? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear), we touched on balance and visual/auditory perception. From what we learned in the last lecture, it would seem proprioception plays some role in balance – how big a role does proprioception play in this context?

Why does a loss of proprioception not affect more muscles, such as mouth muscle movements or voluntary eye movements. Are there different deficiencies that would cause facial muscle control loss?

Why does the load force maximize before the object lifts off the surface? Is it because your muscles have to maximize as much effort as they will need for the duration of the lift just to get the object off the surface?

We know that there is a particular section of the brain that is particularly sensitive to recognizing faces. Let's suppose two people have the same sensitivity to faces, but one is very bad at putting a name to the face, whereas the other has no trouble. Does this have something to do with a break between the visual (facial) area and memory areas, or is it a problem of attention (the person did not attend well enough to the name of the person), or something else?

Page 2: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Olfaction and Taste: Chemical Senses

Wolfe et al Ch 14,15 Kandell et al Ch 32

Similar mode of transduction

Intimately related perceptually

Smell, vision, audition – information about distant state of environment

Taste, somatosensation – information about proximal state

Smell – learned Taste – innate

Vision, audition: link to semantic knowledgeTaste, smell, somatosensation: weak links to semantic knowledge

Page 3: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Odorant molecules: volatile, small, hydrophobic, but not all suchmolecules have odor eg carbon monoxide, methane

Page 4: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Sensory Interface

Page 5: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),
Page 6: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),
Page 7: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Very slow

Olfactory receptors

Page 8: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

350-400 different types of OR

Page 9: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Need 6-7 odorant molecules to bind to a receptor to initiate an action potential.40 action potentials for detectible smell.

There are about 20 million olactoryf sensory neurons (OSN) cf visionBloodhounds: 220 mill OSN’sDogs are 108 times more sensitive (pigs, salmon, kiwis)

OSN’s regenerate in ~ 28 days (but regeneration doesn’t keep up with degenerationwith aging)

Humans – 6000 glomeruli – more than mice

Page 10: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Olfactory bulb vulnerable to damage – anosmia (trauma, infection, medications)Reduced sensitivity often an early symptom of Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s

Thin axons – long latency – 4oo ms vs 45 ms for vision

Olfactory bulbactivity modulated byexperience

Tight link between odors andemotional associations

Note – signals don’tgo through theThalamus

Odors don’t wake one up

Assigns value?

Page 11: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

The trigeminal nerve’s role in the perception of odors

Page 12: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Buck & Axel 1991

Mammalian genome has 1000-2000 different olfactory receptor genes, each of which codes for a single type of OR

In humans about 70% are non-functional.(cilantro blindness – missing gene for floral component, smell soapy component)

More copies of a certain receptor leads to more intense sensation

Trade-off between color sensitivity and expressed olfactory genes???

Page 13: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Odorant-receptor binding and odorant activation: shape-pattern theory

Smells are identified by the pattern of activity across different OSN’s – cf color vision

Page 14: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Odorant-receptor binding

Page 15: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Odorant-receptor binding and odorant activation

Page 16: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Evidence: Stereoisomers contain the same atoms, but smell completely different

Page 17: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Hypothetical role of OR receptor activation timing and order

Page 18: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

analysis and synthesis

Page 19: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Sensitivity may vary with hormonal state, experience

Discrimination – thousands of odors. More with training eg wine tasters.Much harder to identify an odor. Difficult to assign labels.

Odor memory is very long lasting (eg years)

Adaptation – rapid adaptation – OR’s retreat into cell body – 1 min to 20 min-Takes longer to adapt to strong odors.Cross adaptation between similar odors eg perfumes and longer term habituation

Some genes may be turned on by environmental factors.

Smells are learned – no preferences in infantsLearned taste aversions

Page 20: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

hedonics

Page 21: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Odor-induced recollections evoke emotionsDoes this quality imply that odors are particularly good cues for memory?

Page 22: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

The olfactory system of a hamster

No sensitivity to pheremones in humansNo accessory olfactory bulb.

Page 23: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Molecules released into the air inside mouth travel up through the retronasal passage into the nose, then contact the olfactory epithelium

Link between taste and smell = flavor. Odor is attributed to taste.

Somatosensory system also contributes to taste sensation eg creamy

Page 24: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Locations of each type of taste papilla. Neural signals from the taste buds in those papillae are transmitted via cranial nerves VII, IX, and X to the brain

No taste buds in the filiform papillae

Page 25: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Typical variability in the density of fungiform papillae from one individual to the next. Large individual differences in taste sensitivity

Page 26: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Taste buds – clusters of taste cells

Binding sites on microvilli

Seratonin, norepeniphrine

Transmission?

Cells turn over in a few days

One cell innervated by more than onenerve fibre, and one nerve to more than one cell.A single fibre contacts cells with same specificity

Page 27: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Taste receptor cell: different receptor mechanisms for ionic stimuli (salty and sour)

Sweet and bitter – similar mechanism to odors – G protein coupled receptors, GPCR’s,lock and key mechanism.

Page 28: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Family of 25 different bitter receptors. Bitter gene family is TAS2RBitter receptors designated by TAS2R#, where # is the number of the receptor

There are thousands of bitter molecules.Bitter substances typically poisons. Many receptors needed to respond to diversity.PTC blindness (brussel sprouts)Bitter receptos in gut. Hormonalmodulation of bitter sensitivity (pregnancy)

Page 29: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Structure of the T1R2-T1R3 heterodimer sweet receptor, showing binding sites for both large and small sweet molecules (TAS1R1,2,3 genes)unlike bitter, only 3 receptors

Sweetness evoked by sugars (CH20)n

Page 30: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Taste information projects from the tongue to the medulla, then to the thalamus, the insula, and orbitofrontal cortex

Integrates Signals: temp,Touch,small

Mutual inhibition between the 3 nerves – damage to one leaves taste relatively unaffectedAlso get phantom taste.Inhibition from taste cortex to others senses eg pain

Page 31: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Innate sensitivity to sweet and sour etc (newborns) cf smell

No evidence for “specific hungers”, because vitamin content cannot be detected.

Page 32: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Perceived tastes for each of four stimuli

Labeled lines (versus pattern coding)

Tastes can be analyzed into components – cf smells

Audition – labeled linesColor, smell – pattern coding

Monkey data from responses of taste fibres.

Page 33: In previous lectures (especially when discussing the inner ear),

Intensity versus concentration – relatively shallow slopes. cf brightness/ threshold

Steven’s Power Law S = aIb B = 0.3 quinine, 0.8 sucrose