59
Claudia Frugiuele Carleton University MMRSSM Lepton number as R symmetry, Sneutrino as down type Higgs Edinburgh 13/04/2011 q\\\\\\AQ in collaboration with Thomas Grégoire 1

in collaboration with Thomas Grégoire

  • Upload
    onslow

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Claudia Frugiuele Carleton University MMRSSM Lepton number as R symmetry, Sneutrino as down type Higgs Edinburgh 13/04/2011 q \\\\\\AQ. in collaboration with Thomas Grégoire. Outline. SUSY, MSSM, R p Continuous R symmetry, MRSSM Our model: MoreMinimalRSSM Experimental constraints - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

1

Claudia FrugiueleCarleton University

MMRSSMLepton number as R symmetry,Sneutrino as down type Higgs

Edinburgh 13/04/2011

q\\\\\\AQ

in collaboration with Thomas Grégoire

Page 2: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

2

Outline1. SUSY, MSSM, Rp

2. Continuous R symmetry, MRSSM

3. Our model: MoreMinimalRSSM4. Experimental constraints5. MMRSSM features, and pheno

Page 3: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

3

SUPERSYMMETRY

• Most popular solution to the hierarchy problem.

• Symmetry between fermions, and bosons

With same mass and quantum number

Page 4: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

4

SUPERFIELD contains Fermion/Boson and its SUSY partner Boson/

Fermion

SM fermion bosonic, spin 0, superpartner, sfermions.

SM boson spin ½ fermiongauge boson, gaugino. Higgs, higgsino

Page 5: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

5

MSSM (Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the SM)

Each SM field is promoted to a superfield.

Page 6: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

6

1) We do not see scalar electrons or fermionic gluons! Supersymmetry should be broken.

2) Still solution to hierarchy problem as long as SUSY-breaking operators are “soft” (d<4).

SUSY BREAKING

Page 7: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

7

1)Mass and mixing term for sleptons, squarksand higgses.

2) Majorana mass for the gauginos

3) Trilinear couplings

SOFT TERMS

Page 8: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

8

SUSY HIGGS SECTOR

Hu mass to the up type fermions Hd mass to the down type fermions.

MSSM Higgs sector two higgs doublets model

Yukawa interactions contained in the superpotential, holomorphic function of the superfields

Page 9: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

9

SUSY HIGGS SECTORHd same gauge numbers of a lepton field, but the sneutrino can’t be a Higgs field.

Is it possible Hd L ?

Page 10: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

10

1) Hd is necessary to cancel the Hu anomalies.

2) Sneutrino VeV violates lepton number, constraints on the neutrino mass impose the VeV to be very small.

No it is not.

Page 11: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

11

MSSM SUPERPOTENTIAL

to give mass to the Higgsino

But Lepton and baryon number are not accidental symmetries

ex. fast proton decay

Claudia Frugiuele
Page 12: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

12

Proton decay

Majorana neutrino mass

Strong bounds on these couplings!

fig. hep-ph/0406039v2

Page 13: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

13

R parity• Typical solution: impose a discrete symmetry called R parity

Fermionic and bosonic component of a superfield have different R parity!

• SM particle even under R parity • SUSY partners odd under it

Distinctive pheno at the LHC!

Page 14: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

14

Model with R parity violation

We introduce these terms in the superpotential

Couplings are highly constrained from the experimental bounds ( neutrino mass)

Interesting and different pheno at the LHC.

Page 15: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

15

U(1)R continuous R symmetry

R parity contained in U(1) R continuous symmetry.

U(1)R acts differently on the fermionic andbosonic component of a field:

Page 16: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

16

U(1)R symmetry

Gauge superfield, fixed R chargeR gauge boson=0

R gauginos=1

SU

Gauginos Majorana mass are forbidden by R symmetry MSSM is not R symmetry invariant

Gauginos should be Dirac fermions!

Page 17: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

17

Dirac Gauginos

New Adjoints superfields for each SM gauge group to give Dirac mass to the gauginos

Supersoft SUSY breaking operator,Fox, Nelson, Weiner, 2002

D term spurion

Page 18: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

18

MRSSM

Enlarged Higgs sector, two new doublets Ru Rd

New Adjoints superfields for each SM gauge group to give Dirac mass to the gauginos

arXiv::0712.2039 [hep-ph]

Page 19: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

19

MRSSM Higgs sector

Forbidden by R symmetry

Necessary to give mass to the higgsino

W superpotential R charge 2

Page 20: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

20

MRSSM features1)Dirac gauginos2)No left/right mixing as trilinear soft couplings are forbidden by R symmetry3)Enlarged Higgs sector, inert doublets4) Large flavor violation compatible with bounds

Is this the Minimal R symmetric SSM?

Page 21: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

21

MMRSSM More Minimal MRSSM

R symmetry as Lepton number,sneutrino as down type Higgs

Hd La a=e or μ or τ

Page 22: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

22

We economized the particle content of the model respect the MRSSM!

One of the sneutrino plays the role of the down type Higgs Hd

Necessary to cancel anomalies and to give mass to the Higgsino

Page 23: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

23

U(1)R lepton number, ex. here electron number

SM particle don’t carry R charge beside electron and its neutrino.SUSY partners carry all R charge besides the slectron,and the electronic sneutrino

Ex:Qi R charge 1, fermion R charge 1-1=0

Page 24: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

24

OUR MODEL:

The electronic sneutrino does not carry R charge/lepton number

A sneutrino VeV does not induce a neutrino mass!

Page 25: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

25

More minimal particle content of the model respect the MRSSM!

Just two Higgs doublets as in the MSSM, one is inert as the lepton field gives mass to the down type fermions

Need just to add the adjoints superfields to the MSSM spectrum

Page 26: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

26

OUR MODEL:

MMRSSM superpotential

Down type Yukawa couplings= Rp violating couplings

SU

is nulll. Yukawa coupling for the electron is generated by SUSY breaking

Higgsino mass

Page 27: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

27

Rp parity and our symmetry

Rp violating couplings

Standard Rp parity is violated as our R symmetry is not the usual R symmetry (ex:MRSSM), but it is one of the lepton number

SU

Page 28: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

28

MMRSSM EXPERIMENTAL CONSTRAINTS

Page 29: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

29

MMRSSM Experimental constraints:

No constraints from neutrino mass, but..

1) Neutrino and electron mixes with adjoints fermions.2) Other Rp violating couplings bounds3) R symmetry breaking by anomaly mediation4) Cosmological bounds

Page 30: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

30

Leptons mixing

va sneutrino VeV

a=e or μ or τ

Page 31: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

31

• Constraints from the gauge bosons couplings

• Lepton universality violation

Leptons mixing

Page 32: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

32

Leptons mixing• Strongest bounds from the Z0 coupling

GeV

Page 33: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

33

Sneutrino VeV bounds

Heavy gauginos, large sneutrino VeV

a=e

a=μ,τ

Page 34: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

34

Bounds from Rp violation

Down type Yukawa couplings = Rp violating couplings,

EWPM bounds, no neutrino bounds!

Page 35: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

35

Trilinear Rp violating couplings induce neutrino mass, in our case they don’t. Majorana neutrino mass forbidden by R symmetry

Less strong bounds! fig. hep-ph/0406039v2

Page 36: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

36

Indirect bounds from EWPM

Contribution to GF

Semileptonic Meson decay

fig. hep-ph/0406039v2

Page 37: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

37

Lower bound on sneutrino VeV

Tau Yukawa

Bottom quark Yukawa

Very high tanβ region excluded

Page 38: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

38

• Less stringent bounds!ex bottom quark yukawa

Our case

Neutrino bounds

can have a sizeable branching ratio!

Page 39: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

39

R symmetry broken by Anomaly mediation

Majorana mass for gauginos

Trilinear scalar coupling

Majorana mass for the neutrino.

Page 40: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

40

Neutrino mass generated by Left/Right mixing generated by anomaly mediation

fig. hep-ph/0406039v2

Page 41: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

41

R symmetry broken by Anomaly mediation

Bounds on SUSY breakingScale, F <1016 (GeV) 2

Gauge mediation

Page 42: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

42

Low scale SUSY breaking:Gauge mediation

Low scale SUSY breaking

No gravity mediation.

R-symmetric gauge mediation

Several models (J. Amigo et al., JHEP 0901 (2009) 018, K.Benakli,M.GoodsellNucl.Phys. B816 (2009) 185–203,L.M Carpenter arXiv:1007.0017.)

Page 43: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

43

• Unstable• Possible Dark matter candidateBUT…

Gravitino LSP

Page 44: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

44

The relic density should be very small

Gravitino LSP

Very low reheating temperature required!

Page 45: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

45

Gravitino LSP

TR below the SUSY threshold

GeV

Page 46: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

46

Summary:

1) The sneutrino VeV can be quite large for fairly heavy gauginos,

2) Stronger Rp violation than in the usual scenario, expect phenomenological consequence,

3) Low scale SUSY breaking 4) Gravitino is not dark matter

Page 47: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

47

The Model

Page 48: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

48

Outline• Mu Bmu problem• Yukawa coupling for the

Higgs/Lepton• Electroweak symmetry breaking • LHC Phenomenology

Page 49: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

49

Mu/Bmu problem

Naturalness

X spurion field

Higgsino mass Mixing term

Page 50: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

50

Mu/Bmu problem

One loop

One loop

Gauge mediation

Fine tuning!

Page 51: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

51

Mu/Bmu problem

One loop

Two loops

Gauge mediation

No fine tuning

Page 52: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

52

Mu/Bmu problemOne loop

Two loops

Different operators.

EASYterm

term

Page 53: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

53

Mu/Bmu problem

One loop

One loop

Fine tuning!

Page 54: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

54

Mu/Bmu problem

Solution inspired bymodel by Giudice,Dvali,Pomarol (1998)

Messenger field

Page 55: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

55

Yukawa coupling:

More link fields to add

For

very low scale SUSY breaking

Null, Yukawa coupling generated through SUSY breaking

Page 56: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

56

EWSB:MSSM scalar potential with

No mu term for the sneutrino.

Rd does not develop a VeV, it is an inert doublet

Rd necessary to cancel the Hu anomalies and to give mass to the higgsino.

Page 57: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

57

MMRSSM Phenomelogy(work in progress)

Our R symmetry impose that ALL the decay chainsshould end with electrons or electronic neutrinos.

Lightest Ra particles charged lepton and neutrinos.

Multileptons signature at the LHC.

Pheno similar to Rp violating models.

Page 58: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

58

MMRSSM Phenomelogy

LEPTO SQUARK Shorter decay chain!

But shorter decay and Dirac gauginos as smoking gun.

Stronger Rp violation in our model

Usual scenario Rp effects felt just in the decay.

Page 59: in collaboration with  Thomas  Grégoire

59

CONCLUSIONS• MMRSSM minimal particle content• The sneutrino is the down type higgs!• Interesting LHC phenomenology• Interesting possible scenario for neutrino

model building • MMRSSM Dark matter candidate ?

Axino/Axions sector?