Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
| 1
Improving the quality of ASEAN
journals with Scopus
14 November 2017
Presented by:
Derrick Duncombe
Market Development Manager (APAC)
| 2
2) Scopus & CSAB
3) Q & A
1) Research Landscape (ASEAN)
Agenda
a) Evaluation process
b) CSAB and the Scopus Journal selection criteria
| 3
1) Research landscape (ASEAN)
| 4
ASEAN scholarly output since 2000
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 5
ASEAN – by publication
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 6
ASEAN – by citations
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 7
ASEAN’s overall research performance
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 8
ASEAN – publications by subject areaWorld average
| 9
Asia Pacific’s overall research performance
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 10
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
ASEAN ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE NORTH AMERICA
OVERALL RESEARCH PERFORMANCE
Scholarly output: Citation count:
Global Comparison – Scholarly output & Citation count
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 11
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ASEAN ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE NORTH AMERICA
OVERALL RESEARCH PERFORMANCE
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI): Citations per publication:
Global Comparison – FWCI & Citations per publication
World
Average
Source: SciVal (as @ 10 October 2017)
| 12
2) Scopus and CSAB
|13|
Scopus is the world’s largest
abstract and citation database of
peer-reviewed scientific literature
|14|
|15|
|16|
|17|
|18|
|19|
|20|
|21|
World University Ranking bodies use Scopus data
|22|
World University Ranking bodies use Scopus data
|23|
|24|
| 25
When journals get indexed in Scopus, what does it mean?
A journal that is suggested to Scopus and gets accepted for inclusion
by the CSAB Subject Chairs and indexed into its database will get:
• international visibility
• increased citations for individual researchers as well as
the journal
• increased opportunity for collaboration with other researchers
from around the world
The journal will also be contributing to the wider scholarly community
in the specialist subject field.
25
| 26| 26| | 26
Finding Authoritative Researchers
Needs:
• I need to find an expert in the right fields(s)
• Someone with a good volume and impact of publications
• Local who is recognized internationally
| 27| 27| | 27
Potential Editors, Authors, Reviewers
| 28| 28| | 28
Potential Editors, Authors, Reviewers
| 29| 29| | 29
Use the Scopus Author Profile
Use the Scopus author profile to understand where the author is based, their
level of experience, publication output and impact, relevant to your topic.
| 30| 30| | 30
What are the top Journals publishing in the topic?
| 31| 31| | 31
Explore the best journals active in that topic
| 32| 32| | 32
Latest Developments in Scopus
| 33| 33| | 33
Funding Acknowledgements
| 34| 34| | 34
Funding data expansion project
What?
• Capture full text funding information
• Tag funding body name, acronym and number using Natural Language Processing (NLP)
• Backfill full text funding information and tagging back to 2008 and further
• Include funding information from 3rd party curated lists: (NIH/NSF/CrossRef/KAKEN/ResearchFish)
Why?
• Provide funders with high(er) quality funding information in Scopus
• Allows for verification & identifying additional funding sources
Scope • 2016 going forward
• Backfill to 2008 (same as WoS) and further
2015 2017Q1
2016Q2 Q3 Q4
Q1
2017Q2 Q3 Q4
Start capture funding
information forward flow
Visualize funding data in
Scopus.comProject end
Start development NPL tagging tool
Start defining capturing instructions
Start including
3rd party lists
Number Funding Acronym
Conselho Nacional de Desenvo
lvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG
291472 European Research Council ERC
Funding text
We are grateful for K. Behnia, Y.-L. Chen, L.-K. Lim,
Z.-K. Liu, E. G. Mele, J. Moore, S.-Q. Shen and D.
Varjas for helpful discussions. This work was
financially supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemein- schaft DFG (Project No. EB
518/1-1 of DFG-SPP 1666 Topological Insulators, and
SFB 1143) and by the ERC (Advanced Grant No.
291472 Idea Heusler). R.D.d.R. acknowledges
financial support from the Brazilian agency CNPq.
| 35| 35| | 35
Funding acknowledgements in Scopus records
| 36| 36| | 36
Search by Funding Sponsor
| 37| 37| | 37
CiteScore Journal Metrics
| 38| 38| | 38
CiteScore is a simple metric for all Scopus journals
CiteScore Impact Factor
A = citations to 3 years of documents A = citations to 2 or 5 years of documents
B = all documents indexed in Scopus, same as A B = only citable items (articles and reviews),
different from A
Note: at launch, all titles in the May 2016 title list, and with some documents indexed in 2016, will have CiteScore metrics
B
CiteScore 2015 value
B
=
A
Documents from 3 years
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
A
2011
|39|
Source: https://journalmetrics.scopus.com/
Snowball metrics symbol
| 41| 41| | 41
Comprehensive
• Based on Scopus, the world’s broadest database
• A CiteScore will be available for all serials, not just journals
• CiteScore can be calculated for portfolios
Transparent
• CiteScore and associated metrics will be available for free
• CiteScore is easy to calculate for yourself
• The underlying database is available for you to interrogate
Current
• CiteScore Tracker is updated monthly
• New serial titles will have CiteScore metrics the year after they are indexed in Scopus
Main advantages of CiteScore
And best of all … it’s FREE!
| 42| 42| | 42
PlumX Metrics
| 43| 43| | 43
Plum Analytics joined Elsevier in February 2017
43Source: https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/corporate/elsevier-acquires-leading-altmetrics-provider-plum-analytics
| 44| 44| | 44
USAGE(clicks, downloads, views,
library holdings, video plays)
CAPTURES(bookmarks, code forks, favorites,
readers, watchers)
MENTIONS(blog posts, comments, reviews,
Wikipedia links)
SOCIAL MEDIA(+1s, likes, shares, tweets)
CITATIONS(citation indexes, patent
citations, clinical citations)
Metrics
Categories
| 45| 45| | 45
| 46| 46| | 46
So what are the latest developments in Scopus
There are many developments, but if I have to mention just three:
1. Funding ackoweldgements in Scopus are being heavily expanded
2. CiteScore journal metrics and www.journalmetrics.scopus.com
3. PlumX Metrics
|47|
2a) Evaluation Process
|48|
Continuous, online title review process for selecting new journals for Scopus coverage
As a primary publisher and information aggregator, Elsevier understands the needs of Authors, Editors and Publishers and
provides resources to support the community. Available resources to help journals with successful title review process:
publication ethics resources | FAQs | advisory documents | reviewer comments | editor and publishing services
https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content/content-policy-and-selection or [email protected]
| 49
Less than half of the reviewed titles are selected for
Scopus coverage
The CSAB is selective and strict on quality: in total 5,411 titles reviewed (2011 –2015) of
which 2,587 (48%) accepted for Scopus
±15,000 Suggestions
2011-2015(±3,000 Serials per year
suggested)±5,000 (33%)
Meet Scopus
minimum criteria±5,000
Reviewed
by CSAB<50%
Accepted
Based on data from October 2016.
| 50| 50| 50
Ongoing content curation of the Scopus base to ensure
continuous high quality content
Identification of poor
performing journals
using metrics and
benchmarks
“Radar” to predict
journals with outlier
performance
Direct feedback from
users and
stakeholders on poor
performing journals
Re-evaluation by the Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB)
Content Curation
Curation of the full journal base is essential and expected by our
customers and users.
Review:
Curate:
| 51| 51| 51
Transparent, annual re-evaluation process to ensure
titles continue to meet high quality standards
Learn more on this topic via the Scopus blog: http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-launches-annual-journal-re-evaluation-process-to-maintain-content-quality
or Elsevier.com: http://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content/content-policy-and-selection#title_re-evaluation
Full Scopus Journal base
Year 1
Year 2
Analyze full Scopus journal corpus performance based on
set metrics & benchmarks
Flag underperforming journals & inform journal publishers
If a journal underperforms for 2 consecutive years, CSAB
will re-evaluate the title based on Scopus selection criteria
Continue forward flow Discontinue forward flow or
Analyze full Scopus journal corpus performance based on
set metrics & benchmarks
Flag underperforming journals & inform journal publishers
Flagged journals for which concerns are raised, CSAB will
re-evaluate the title based on Scopus selection criteria
CSAB review
CSAB decision
| 52| 52| 52
2016 Re-evaluation results
• All journal publishers will be informed by Scopus of the Re-evaluation
outcome of their journal in December 2016.
• If discontinued = Journal forward flow discontinued per January 1, 2017.
For more information: http://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content/content-policy-and-selection#title_re-evaluation
>22,000 Journals in
Scopus database
300 Journals
underperformed
for 2 sequential
years, or
concerns were
raised
100% Re-
evaluated
by CSAB
to date
60%
Discontin
ued
|53|
2b) CSAB and the Scopus Journal
Selection Criteria
|54|
| 55| 55| 55
Coverage of high quality journals via selection by the
independent Content Selection & Advisory Board (CSAB)
• The CSAB is an independent board of subject experts from all over the world.
• Board members are chosen for their expertise in specific subject areas; many have (journal) Editor
experience
• Titles are selected for Scopus inclusion by the CSAB.
|56|
Scopus Journal Selection Criteria
Journal Policy Quality of Content Journal Standing Regularity Online Availability
Peer-review
All titles should meet all minimum criteria in order to be considered for Scopus review:
Eligible titles are reviewed by the Content Selection & Advisory Board according to a
combination of 14 quantitative and qualitative selection criteria:
• Convincing editorial
concept/policy
• Type of peer-review
• Diversity geographic
distribution of editors
• Diversity geographic
distribution of authors
• Academic
contribution to the
field
• Clarity of abstracts
• Quality and
conformity with stated
aims & scope
• Readability of
articles
• Citedness of journal
articles in Scopus
• Editor standing
• No delay in
publication schedule
• Content available
online
• English-language
journal home page
• Quality of home
page
Info: http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopus/content-overview
Questions: [email protected]
Title suggestion form: http://suggestor.step.scopus.com/suggestTitle/step1.cfm
English
abstracts
Regular
publication
Roman script
references
Pub. ethics
statement
Stage 1:
Stage 2:
|57|
|58|
| 59
3) Q & A
| 60| 60| 60
Important Scopus resources to stay up to date:Site URL
Scopus Info Site https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus
Scopus Blog http://blog.scopus.com
Scopus newsletter https://communications.elsevier.com/webApp/els_doubleOptInWA?do=0&srv=els_s
copus&sid=71&uif=0&uvis=3
Twitter www.twitter.com/scopus
Facebook www.facebook.com/elsevierscopus
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/scopus-an-eye-on-global-research
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/ScopusDotCom
Thank You!