Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LNG Mass Flow Standard
Improving the “kilogram” for LNG
Dushyant Parkhi
Flow Engineer
VSL
Page
- Why do we need mass flow calibration standards
for LNG?
- What is the role of VSL in LNG
• Goal
• Road Map
- How will the goal be reached?
• LNG-Primary Scale Loop (PSL)
• LNG-Mid Scale Loop (MSL)
Outline
Page
Reliable measurements
Why calibration standards?
LNG Tank gauging system volume flow meter
Best Uncertainties
±0.5% Expected Uncertainties
~ 0.15%
mass flow meter
LNG Custody Transfer :
Trust in Trade
Legal
Requirements
Contractual
Requirements
Commodity Market
LNG as transport fuel
production, storage and
offloading (FPSO) vessels
Based on guidelines
: GIIGNL
used for allocation and control but not for
custody-transfer measurement.
Page
Role of VSL in LNG
SI
SI
National/
Primary
Standards
Secondary / Working
Standards
Instruments in the field
BIPM
VSL
Manufacturers
End users
Metrological traceability requires an established calibration hierarchy.
VSL and/or
calibration
laboratories
Calib
ratio
n h
iera
rchy
Fro
m s
mall to
hig
her u
ncerta
inty
calibration hierarchy
Page
Goal of VSL:
SI
SI
National/
Primary
Standards
Secondary / Working
Standards
Instruments in the field
Get measurement
uncertainty for the
LNG “kilogram”
below 0.1%
Realization of an gravimetric LNG mass flow standard and
calibration facility
Requirements:
Page
Small scale LNG -
LNG as transport
fuel
Primary mass flow standard Mid-scale mass flow standard
Mid-scale volume
flow standard
2014 2009 2015
LNG Composition
calibration systems
Primary Density
standard
Large scale LNG -
Production and
regasification plants
2018
Large scale
flow
standards
2013
LNG Composition
evaluation state-of-
the-art
Improved density correlations /
Improved Equations of State
Traceable LNG
custody transfer
measurements
Clear uncertainty
budgets
Uncertainty reduction
by factor two
Ship tank volume
measurements
uncertainty evaluation
TARGETS
TRIGGERS New LNG applications
with New Business
Models
Methane Number
harmonization / ISO
Road Map:
Page
Execution:
Three Step Approach
Primary flow Standard
Mid-scale flow standard
Full scale facilities
10 - 25 m3/hr 4 -12 ton/hr
5 – 200/400 m3/hr 2 – 100/200 ton/hr
200 - 4000 m3/hr 100– 2,000 ton/hr
Page
Step1: Primary Flow Standard
(PSL)
Calibration and Measurement Capability: Q ~ 10 - 25 m3/hr CMC ~ 0.15%
Supplying
tank
Weighing
tank MUT
Scale
Pump MUT
Page
Flow meter to be calibrated Reference for
calibrations
Weighing tank
Supplying tank
Pump
LNG-PSL Description
Fixed connection
causing non-
constant forces on
scale
Partly undefined
direction of flow
during switch over
Uncertainty in mass
collected between
MUT and
Reference
Uncertainty Sources
Description: Parts
Description: Process
Description: Sources of uncertainties
Page
Step1a: PSL-Improvement
Supplying
tank
Weighing
tank MUT
Scale
Pump MUT
• Reduce uncertainties in flow measurements (<1%) • Provide traceability to Mid Scale Loop (200 m3/h)
WP1 Characterization mechanical hysteresis and stiffness matrix
WP2-4 Parasitic Force Reduction System
1. Reduction tank movement
2. Parasitic force compensation
Reduction uncertainty related to non-constant & parasitic forces
1 flange 2 x,y,z motion stage 3 LNG tank 4 position
measurement 5 flexible piping 6 load cell 7 foundation
Example1 : Parasitic force reduction based on position measurement
Weighing tank
Flex loop
Reduction uncertainty related to non-constant & parasitic forces
Example 2: Parasitic force elimination
Retraction due to Force of decoupling smooth bending of swivel
Dry break coupling
WP1 Decoupling the pipe to eliminate the parasitic forces
WP2-4
Weighing tank Retraction system
WP5 Reducing timing
Reduction uncertainty related to switching and temperature reading
Run mode (= calibration)
Pre run mode to get stable flow
WP5 Reducing timing uncertainty
Improve temperature reading and reduce dead volume uncertainty
Page
Step-2 : Mid Scale Loop