33
Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY April 19, 2008 Chris Prom Assistant University Archivist University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign [email protected] *Special thanks to Beth Yakel, Aprille McKay, and Helen Tibbo!

Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY April 19, 2008

  • Upload
    ismail

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY April 19, 2008. Chris Prom Assistant University Archivist University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from

a Case Study

Midwest Archives ConferenceLouisville, KY April 19, 2008

Chris PromAssistant University Archivist

University of Illinois at [email protected]

*Special thanks to Beth Yakel, Aprille McKay, and Helen Tibbo!

Page 2: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Why Use Web Analytics?

• “the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of Internet data for the purposes of understanding and optimizing Web usage”-- Neil Mason, “The Four Parts of Web Analytics,” http://www.google.com/analytics/cu/ac_the_four_parts.html

• Allows unobtrusive observation of actions (NOT motives or initiative)

• Data is easy to collection and view• Provides basis for action and further study;

iterative redesign

Daniel Russell, regarding Google’s Eyetracking studies: “people behave

differently here, they want to make researcher happy, have

been given a free lunch”

Page 3: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Internal Log Data??138,041 hits on collection records

6,721 hits on “browse by digital content”

117,468 hits on search page

14,210 hits on “browse by campus unit” (12,737 non-staff)

1,855 hits on full finding aid

2,287 hits on “browse by subject”

1,255 hits on “browse by title”

449 hits on “PDF/Deep Search”

Page 4: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Step One—Analyze/Align Current Website Goals and Structure

Structure• Facilitate

Contact• Provide

Descriptive Information

• About us; Link to Programs

• Mediate use• Promote

Services

Archival Website Goals:•Provide information on services?•Provide access to descriptive information?•Drive on-line or on-site use?•Facilitate research, service, learning? (Developing Archival Metrics http://www.si.umich.edu/ArchivalMetrics/ )

More Complex

Page 5: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Step Two: Analyze Current Use Overview of UIUC ‘non-virtual’ use in 2005/06

Page 6: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Step Three—Develop a Privacy Policy

• Google Analytics http://www.google.com/analytics/tos.html – Installation Instructions– COLLECTS what they term “anonymous traffic

data” (includes IP Address)– REPORTS summary information only– Requires use of a privacy policy

• UIUC Archives http://web.library.uiuc.edu/ahx/about/privacy.php

Page 7: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Step Four—Plan the Study

• Know what you really want to measure– Limit yourself and make it actionable!

• Q1:How do people get to our site?• Q2: What are the most popular pages/groups of

content?• Q3: What are most popular searches?• Q4: How do users move through the net and our site

toward 4 ‘goals’?– Use search form– View record series description– View full finding aid– Send email

Better

Page 8: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

My ‘Goal Conversion Funnel’

User visits or uses materials remotely!

Caveat: Does not include direct ‘hits’ via

Google, or other external referrers

Caveat: Does not include emails sent

directly to the address [email protected]

User enters site on home page and searches holdings

Page 9: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q1: “Referrers”

Page 10: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q2: Top Content Areas

Holdings Database

63.3%Program Areas25.3%

Homepage6.3%

Email and Downloads

2.2%

Guides1.1%

Services0.8% Features

0.5%

About0.4%

Pagevisits by Functional Area of Website

Page 11: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q2: Top Content—Homepage

July 4 Weekends

6.3%

Page 12: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q2: Top Content—Archon

64.5%

Page 13: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q2: Top Content—Landing

Hmmm….

55.3% of all visitors enter site on collection page

Page 14: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q3: What do users search for?

• Can measure both external and internal searches

• Drill down to see ‘clickstream’ and exit pages

• Rerun searches to see how users enter and leave site

Page 15: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Q3: Google Keywords (Searches)

Page 16: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

“Clara Hamilton”

YIKES!!!

Page 17: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Wow!Deadend!

Page 18: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

“Daily Illini”

Page 19: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

17 (!) in Google Result Set

LessonWe MUST provide links to digital content (where it exists) or create it (where it does not exist and users are trying to find it).

Page 20: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

“Strip Mines and Illinois”

Page 21: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Clicked! LessonsImportance of controlled subjects area

<title> element usage

Optimize ‘landing page’

It’s the digital content, stupid

Page 22: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Conclusions 1: My Assumptions Were Wrong

• Users RARELY enter our main page, then search

• Users DON’T walk a prescribed path to the physical records (DON’T assume visitor intent,

Peterson, p. 25)• Digital content IS NOT a ‘value added’

function

Page 23: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Conclusion 2: Google optimization matters

• Add more contextual information to landing pages

• Integrate better information into title (66 character rule) to improve page rank.

• Be concise and putting most important information first

• Emphasize content not description

Page 24: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Archon Home: Before

Page 25: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Archon Home: After

Page 26: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Controlcard: Before

Page 27: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Controlcard: After

Page 28: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Finding Aid: Before

Page 29: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Finding Aid: After

Page 30: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Digital Content: Before

?????

Page 31: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Digital Content: After

Page 32: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Next Steps

• Rerun stats on new design, July 2008• Develop ecommerce and explore ‘goal

conversion funnel’• Submit for publication

Page 33: Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from a Case Study Midwest Archives Conference Louisville, KY  April 19, 2008

Improving On-line Archival Access: Preliminary Results from

a Case Study

Midwest Archives ConferenceLouisville, KY April 19, 2008

Chris PromAssistant University Archivist

University of Illinois at [email protected]