Upload
celina-noy
View
217
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improving life chances for studentsImproving life chances for studentsImproving access to University Improving access to University Brunel rising to the ChallengeBrunel rising to the Challenge
Professor Valsa Koshy
Background Background • Local Authority - concern for the waste of potential and the need for interventions in 1999
• Excellence in Cities Excellence in Cities - Gifted and Talented programme, targeting UK cities - Urban Local Authorities, creation of 5 to 10% Gifted and Talented cohorts and enhanced provision
• Widening Participation Widening Participation
• Aimhigher Initiatives Aimhigher Initiatives
The interventionThe intervention
Specific objectivesSpecific objectives
• Design and evaluate a 4-year intervention programme to raise students’ academic achievement and aspirations, taking into account the on-going gathering of data.
• Construct a model for wider use, which could be replicated by practitioners in different settings. The proposed model could directly impact on policy and practice.
Our beliefs
We believe that submerged talent exists in areas in urban areas. Our teaching experience and findings from previous projects had shown that potential was present but had not fully developed. Central to our belief in setting up of this project was the perspective of schools in these areas were not being intellectual deserts. Aspects of pop culture, suppressive peer-group pressure as well as capped aspirations seemed to be preventing youngsters from achieving their full potential.
What did we do? What did we do?
• 20 then 60 students (12 years old - for 4 years)20 then 60 students (12 years old - for 4 years)
• Recruited from state schools - lower income, Recruited from state schools - lower income, potential to achieve potential to achieve
• 8 - 10 Saturdays on the Brunel University campus8 - 10 Saturdays on the Brunel University campus
• Expansion of student numbers and LAs Expansion of student numbers and LAs
First cohort First cohort - -
Expansion of programme Participating Local Authorities and schools33 schools from 9 LAs (600 students)
Selection Criteria
Ability or Potential to embark on University studies.
An entitlement to free school meals including students who have recently been removed from this category.
Parents not having had opportunities for higher education.
A flair for one or more dispositions; analytical thinking, creative and imaginative responses often evident as the ability to solve problems. A street-wise maturity, which may not necessarily manifest in academic performance, but may be strengthened by being supported by the programme.
A first attempt at programme designA first attempt at programme design
Issues affecting academic underachievement
• Inappropriate curricular experiences
• Absence of opportunity to develop appropriate school work habits
• School environment peers – not cool to be smart
• Home environment – lack of self-regulation and discipline
• Inconsistent role models
• Minimal parental support and guidance
Research from the USA (Reis et al)
Refinement of programme
Realistic plans for the future
Strong sense of self- efficacy
Supportive adults: teachers, mentors and coaches
Self-Belief and resilience
Parental expectations and academic guidance
Academically challenging sessions
Some principles of the re-designed intervention
Messages
Education is at the core of
an enlightened and fulfilling
life
There is room at the top for you
There is no need to accept
mediocrity
Programme components
Development of Critical Thinking Undergraduate mentors Subject-specific teaching Problem solving Family and Families days Career advice and CV’s Personal research projects Outside speakers
• Involvement of users • Comparator group set up• All components evaluated
• External scrutiny
A Design research approach and set up as a research-site
Questionnaires Interviews Tutor observations and logs Parents’ questionnaires Written evaluations National tests results Student trajectories Interviews with school co-ordinators
Data sources
OutcomesEnhanced confidence University entrance numbers Role of mentorsUniversity Campus influence Changes in academic results Change in the perception that ‘University is not for
us’!Importance of making parents as active partners
and providing parental supportThe need to establish a parent – teacher –
University and businesses quartet The need for longer, sustained programmes
•Impact on Policy
•Media
•Research conferences in the USA, Europe and the UK
•Publications of Urban Scholars Toolkit
•A teaching and curriculum model
Impact and Acknowledgements
So,
We will continue to create a level playing field – reducing the humps and removing the ditches into which many of our children tend to fall.
• With extended numbers • With younger scholars and their parents• With a larger network of schools and Universities