Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improving Journal
Editorial Processes
with ScholarOne Manuscripts
David Thomas
May 2017
The Scholarly Publishing
Environment
4
Why is this important?
Peer reviewworkflow tools establish a formal, fully audited peer review process, and
help find and validate reviewers with appropriate expertise
Ethical publishing practicescheck for plagiarism, duplicate submission, enforce
guidelines, capture conflicts of interests, and prevent
fraudulent reviews
Meet technical requirementscollect all the information required to ensure technical
requirements can be met upon publication
Publication timelinesscollect all key material from authors,
complete forms, and schedule
workflows with appropriate reminders
Reporting tools help identify rate limiting
steps in workflows
Optimising the manuscript
submission process
6
An intuitive and clear submission process for all authors
Required fieldsadd requirements to ensure
authors complete all required
steps
Be specificabout what is actually required
and provide on-screen cues
Outlinegive clear signposts throughout
the submission steps; and provide
clear and concise instructions
Inline error messagesremove frustration for authors
Final submissiononly possible when all steps are complete
Summary of problemsensures nothing is missed
Direct links to any problemsauthors can quickly fix issues
Visual cues for incomplete stepsmanuscripts can’t be submitted until all steps are
complete
8
Ensure data quality — institutional affiliations
InstitutionRinggold Identify provides an
authoritative database of searchable
institution names
Type-ahead searchlets users quickly pull up the correct
affiliation from the Ringgold Identify
database
Matching institutionscorrect name can be selected from
the list to populate affiliation address
9
Ensure data quality — author identity
Create or associate an
ORCID iDduring submission process — this
can be made mandatory for
submitting authors
Create or
associate
ORCID iDduring user
account creation
or registration
Author detailswith hyperlinked
ORCID iD and
validation status
10
Potential ORCID use cases
Manuscript
Submit &
review
Manuscriptvia ScholarOne
Manuscripts
Publisher
production
system
Export
publication
datatitle, author,
ORCID iDs
Obtain
DOIfrom CrossRef
Automatically
update publication
information in user’s
ORCID profile
Peer
Reviewreview activity
can be
acknowledged
in user’s
ORCID profile
11
Ensure data quality — capture funding sources
Type-ahead searchlets users quickly pull up potential matches from the CrossRef Funder Registry
taxonomy
Matching funder namefunders can be selected and added. New
funders can be created and will be
flagged as not being part of the Registry
Funder detailsare now part of the manuscript record and metadata — this is
available for reporting, publication, and downstream indexing
12
Use on-screen instructions
Configure guidancetools let staff add instructions to any system page — for
all users: authors, editors, reviewers, and staff
Contextual
instructions
some instructions
can be applied to
specific pages for
additional clarity
13
Tool tips for contextual help
Tool tips
let journal staff
create contextual
instructions with
hyperlinks to
further information
A single clickto find further
information
14
Language editing
Language editing
option can be made
available — this is a third-
party service
Service providersare not limited to a single
company — several options
can be offered (Edanz,
Editage, etc.)
Some publisher offer their
own service
15
Submission Partners
Submit
from
Overleafdirectly or
initiate via
overleaf.com
Write and
collaborateuse either a LaTeX
or rich text editor
Submit to
journalfrom Overleaf
Coming in 2017additional submission partners
Checking new manuscripts
and maintaining editorial
standards
17
Admin checklists
Checklistuse a configurable webform to check
manuscript is ready for further
consideration
Unsubmitfor technical corrections — incorrect
reference format, missing figures or tables,
etc.
Savebut hold manuscript for more information
Reject and transfer
manuscripts to another title
Rejectmanuscripts that are out-of-scope, very
poor, or have critical problems
Approvemanuscripts that are ready for the editors
18
Duplicate submission check
Perform checkchecks across a site (or several sites)
for duplicate or similar previous
submissions
Potential match detailssearch is based on both title and
author list
19
CrossChec
kcan be run
manually or
automated to run
in the
background.
Similarity Index
threshold can
trigger an email
warning to staff
CrossCheck, Powered by
iThenticateis an originality / plagiarism checking service.
Users need to subscribe to the service &
provide their content for indexing.
CrossCheck indexes a large amount of
publisher content and wide range of other
sources
iThenticate Report
Viewershows sources, level of similarity,
and areas of matching text
Similarity Indexand included / excluded content
Sourcesfor matching material
Effective and efficient peer
review
21
Make the most of your user data
AUTHOR (AU) EDİTOR-İN-CHİEF (EIC) ASSOCİATE EDİTOR (AE)REVİEWER (REV)
Keep your data clean and up to
date
Use merge and admin
toolsto consolidate identity
Use ORCID iDsand encourage their
uptake
Use external searchesto help verify identities and correct
correspondence details
22
Add value to user accounts
Use account flagsto capture important information
Use person designationfor instance, editorial board member, tenure
committee
Use commentsto record addition information about the candidate
Use attributeskeywords, areas of interest, classifications,
specialities to help locate relevant editors &
reviewers
23
Find the best reviewer candidates
Search toolslet you search your local
database and also other
data sources (Google,
PubMed, Web of
Science)
Advanced
searchcombine multiple
fields (&
wildcards) with
keywords,
assignment data,
and other
information to find
the most suitable
reviewer
candidates
24
Make the right selections with key information
Headline metricskey reviewer performance information — number in parentheses
shows data from across shared sites
Choose which metrics to displayup to five key indicators in the main search results
View full
recordall details are
available including
past performance
25
Use effective reminders
Invite reviewersresponse links in the email — auto decline, alternates list, & alternative suggestions feature available
Decline or
unresponsive
No reportReviewers assigneddirect link to report form in email
Decision
Reviewers report
Select
reviewers
1
2 DAYS
25 DAYS
Invite remindersup to two invite reminders can be configured — if reviewers don’t respond within a
defined time period they can be auto-declined
1
7 DAYS BEFORE
2ON DUE DATE
37 DAYS OVERDUE
Reviewer reminders remindersany number of reminders can be configured to be sent before, on, or after the due
date. Extensions can be granted for all reminders
26
Build effective reminders
Templatestemplates can be
created & edited
triggering activity
is specified
Template section
Global
editing toolsglobal search and
replace or download
for offline editing
Email templatetags can be inserted to pull in user & manuscript
information
tags are also used in the email header
Reminderscan be set relative to the task due date, to go before, on, or
after the task is due
27
Watch for fraudulent reviewers http://stateofinnovation.thomsonreuters.com/fraud-
in-peer-review
Be wary of fraudulent
reviewersuse the external searches to
verify identity & relevant expertise
Suggested reviewersdirect Google and Web of
Science search options are
available in addition to external
search tools
Web of Sciencewill return the results of an
author name search
Googlewill return the results of an
email address search
Use account flagsto show validated reviewer
details
28
Avoid exhausting your reviewers
Use the datato look at current & previous assignments
and use this information to guide
selections
Use reviewer activity
monitor how often you invite and how
many manuscripts reviewers handle
Save time
save your search preferences
29
Structure your reviews for better, more informed responses
Ask focused
questionson specific topics
about the manuscript
to get more qualified
feedback
Reviewer recommendationsome journals prefer not to bias any
comments by asking for a recommendation
Collect commentsboth confidential for editors / staff and also for
transmission back to the author
any field can be made mandatory
30
Use automation to aid efficiency
MANUSCRİPT METADATA
• author names
• manuscript title
• manuscript abstract
• manuscript keywords
• publication journal
PUBLİSHED PAPERS
• 12,000 journals
• 150,000 conference proceedings
• 250 subject disciplines
• previous 5 years’ data
• 7.3 million individuals
AUTHOR FİNGERPRİNT
their research interests
JOURNAL FİNGERPRİNT
publication field and scope
PAPER FİNGERPRİNT
subject areas and keywords
Reviewer Locatoruses our ATLAS text analysis tool
to link and refine matches with
researchers in the Web of
Science™ Core Collection
Reviewer
LocatorReviewer Locator
automatically
recommends reviewers
based on their publication
record in the Web of
Science™
Reviewer
Locator
up to 30
suggestions are
ready for the
editor to use
all suggestions
link through to
record in the
Web of
Science™ and
DOI link to
published
article
recommended
reviewers can
be quickly
added
Making recommendations
and decisions
WF 0no AEs
ADMİN
CHECKLİST
EIC SELECT &
İNVİTE REVİEWER
REVİEWER
AGREES
REVİEWER
SCORES
EIC DECİSİON
AUTHOR SUBMİTS
AD
DİT
İON
AL
RE
VİE
WE
RS
RE
QU
İRE
D
WF 1AE direct
decision
AD
DİT
İON
AL
RE
VİE
WE
RS
RE
QU
İRE
D
ADMİN
CHECKLİST
EIC ASSİGNMENT
EIC ASSİGNS AE
AE SELECT &
İNVİTE REVİEWER
REVİEWER
AGREES
REVİEWER
SCORES
AE DECİSİON
AUTHOR SUBMİTS WF 4AE
recommendation
then EIC final
decision
ADMİN CHECKLİST
EIC ASSİGNMENT
EIC ASSİGNS AE
AE SELECT &
İNVİTE REVİEWER
REVİEWER
AGREES
REVİEWER
SCORES
AE
RECOMMENDATİO
N
AUTHOR SUBMİTS
EIC DECİSİON
AD
DİT
İON
AL
RE
VİE
WE
RS
RE
QU
İRE
D
Best Practice
workflowsmost popular workflows are ready
to go and can be a starting point
for more sophisticated workflows
Recommendations
and decisionscan be mixed — allowing
Associate Editors to make
direct revisions but only to
recommend accept/reject to
the Editor-in-Chief
33
Effective Decision Making
Create your own decision
categoriesso they are clear to everyone
Track revisionson dashboards and reports
Set expiration datesto manage revisions and send
reminders to authors
1
2
34
Inform and instruct authors about their decision
Quick access to all
reportsfor informed decisions
Decision emailshould contain all the information
an author needs for next steps
Revision linkgo direct to submission
Commentsappended (and any attached
files)
35
Keep track of all processes
Use reportsto check on editor
decision ratios to
maintain copy flow
and protect
integrity
Analyse, present and compare datause in editorial board meetings, to mentor new editors etc.
Managing accepted
manuscripts
37
Manage the post-acceptance process
Post-acceptance
dashboardmanuscripts don’t stop once
accepted — ensure they are ready
to move forward towards publication
Track key post-acceptance stepsmanage all the steps before handing over the manuscript
to production, composition, & hosting services
Production toolsmanage volumes and issues and create export batches
38
Creating and managing journal issues
Current running ordercreate a table of contents
Issue datesdates and issue metadata
Advanced searchsearch tools for adding manuscripts.
Manuscripts can also be added
directly to existing issues
Placeholdersfor external content, adverts, tables
of content, instructions to authors
PaginationEstimates are based on multipliers in
the site designation. Actual can be
added
Export Entire Issueall files, metadata, & running order
39
Exporting your accepted content for publication
Production checklistensure accepted manuscript is ready
to move forward into publication
Export your contentsend all files & metadata
Build packagewhat to include
Chose locationwhere to send it
Pick formatfor the metadata
Efficient journal
administration
41
Use Dashboards to manage manuscript flow
Dashboard listsexpand workflow to
show status of all
manuscripts, including
those overdue at key
stages
Search toolsfind manuscripts quickly
42
All information in a single place
Header detail(see next slide)
Manuscript informationthe ‘full file’
Audit trailwhat and when it happened, and who did it
Manuscript filesall files and appropriate management tools
Task detailoptions for pending task
Pending taskalways located at the top right of the record
Assignment detailsnames hyperlinked for quick messaging
Completed reviewsreviewer recommendation and report detail
Completed
recommendationseditor recommendations (where applicable)
Version historysee previous and later versions of the
manuscript
Notesconfidential notes from staff & editors
43
The Manuscript Header: A key to the manuscript
New notemagenta star
Add a new noteor from the notes section
Companion
paperlink between papers
Manuscript
detailmanuscript type, any
custom metadata,
status & due date Proofs and filesHTML & PDF proofs, plus
the original files
Directly editablecustom question
metadata
External
searcheson key
manuscript
fields
Assignmentscurrent role
assignments
Time in reviewkey milestones
Manuscript flagsup to 12 customisable flags Submitting author
hyperlinked name, proxy
option, & any user flags Manuscript ID & title
unique identifier (.Rn for
revision)
44
Manage Paperwork & Forms Online
E-forms processfor capturing legal and other agreements
SEND FORM(to submitting or all
authors)
AUTHOR(S)
COMPLETES
FORMS
COMPLETE
SKİP FOR
NOW
REMİNDER
S
Dashboarde-forms can be tracked on
role dashboards
Author(s)can complete forms in their Author Centre or go via a link in their emails
45
Use reporting tools
A full set of standard reports are available……or build you own using the drag-and-drop report builder
Reports can be saved, made available by role, or scheduled for email distribution
Reportsreports can be made
available from any centre
dashboards
Build-your-own
reportsusers can build custom
reports using simple drag-
and-drop tools
Standard reportskey reports are ready to run
Drag-and-dropdata fields can simply
be dropped into the
table
Data treea comprehensive list
of data fields can be
used
Pre-built
filtersand other features
are available to
make reporting
easier
Tool barsave, format, and access advanced features like
filters, pivots, groups, summaries and calculated
fields
46
Reporting — some key metrics
Submission Triage Decisions Online
publication
Peer
review
REVİSİON
Reject
ACCEPT
NUMBER OF ARTİCLES
RETURNED TO AUTHOR
EDİTOR
ACCEPT/REJECT
RATES
EDİTOR
TURNAROUND
TİME
REVİEWER
DECLİNE
RATE
REVİEWER
TURNAROUND
TİME
REVİEWER
RESPONSES
JOURNAL
ACCEPT/REJEC
T RATES
REVİSİON RATE, NUMBER OF
REVİSİONS, AND HOW MANY RETURN
Time to first and final decision
Time to online publication
publication
Time to print publication
Continuous development:
our roadmap for 2017 and
beyond
ScholarOne Manuscripts 2018 priorities (features subject to change)
◉ additional submission integration support
◉ reviewer recognition tools
◉ suspicious review flagging
◉ further partner integrations
◉ automated metadata extraction from files
◉ Reviewer Locator 2.0
◉ redesign of user account creation and management
◉ ideas and product quality improvements
ScholarOne Manuscripts v4.21◉ reviewer user experience re-design
◉ document conversion and processing
improvements
◉ expanded API: manuscripts version history
◉ expanded API: people details
◉ Portuguese/Spanish language toggle
◉ ideas and product quality
Jun
2017
ScholarOne Manuscripts v4.22◉ submission APIs for integration (stage 2)
◉ conversations improvements
◉ single sign-on and people APIs
◉ HTML email support
◉ drag and drop file load
◉ ideas and product quality
Nov
2017
Our roadmap themesin 2017 and beyond:
extending APIs & interoperability
enhancing the user experience
new workflow features, and
tools for automation
David Thomas, Manager EMEA Sales, Publishing & Associations | [email protected] | clarivate.com