106
IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999

IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

IMPROVING EDUCATIONTHROUGH RESEARCH

Catherine CrouchPaul Callan

Emily Fair OsterEric Mazur

Harvard University

Hong Kong University21 October 1999

Page 2: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Peer Instruction

Move first exposure to the material out of the classroom…

Page 3: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Peer Instruction

Move first exposure to the material out of the classroom: assign reading!

Page 4: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Peer Instruction

Move first exposure to the material out of the classroom: assign reading!

Use class to deepen and broaden understanding

Page 5: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Peer Instruction

Move first exposure to the material out of the classroom: assign reading!

Use class to deepen and broaden understanding

by identifying key ideas

Page 6: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Peer Instruction

Move first exposure to the material out of the classroom: assign reading!

Use class to deepen and broaden understanding

by identifying key ideas

and giving students opportunities to think

Page 7: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading

Web-based assignment due before class

Page 8: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading

Web-based assignment due before class

Three questions (content and feedback)

Page 9: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading

Web-based assignment due before class

Three questions (content and feedback)

Graded on effort

Page 10: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading

Web-based assignment due before class

Three questions (content and feedback)

Graded on effort

5% of final grade

Page 11: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

Force Concept Inventory data

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1990FCI pretest

Hestenes, et al., TPT 30, 141 (1992)

Page 12: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1990FCI posttest

Page 13: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1990combined

Page 14: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

1990combined

Page 15: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

1990combined

Page 16: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

Page 17: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

Page 18: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Why use Peer Instruction?

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

1.00

0.23

g = Sf – Si1 – Si

Page 19: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction
Page 20: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1991FCI pretest

Page 21: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1991FCI posttest

Page 22: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

25

20

15

10

5

0252015

score

1050

cou

nt

1991combined

Page 23: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

1.00

0.23

g = Sf – Si1 – Si

Page 24: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

1.00

0.23

g = Sf – Si1 – Si

Page 25: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

1.00

0.23

g = Sf – Si1 – Si

Page 26: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Results

100

80

60

40

20

chan

ge in

sco

re, S

f – S

i (%

)

100806040200

initial score, Si (%)

0

perfect score

1.00

0.23

g = Sf – Si1 – Si

0.48

Page 27: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

ConcepTest data

120

160

80

40

coun

t

CBA

answer

before discussion

0

justguessingnot

quite sure

prettysure

Page 28: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

ConcepTest data

120

160

80

40

coun

t

CBA

answer

before discussion

0

justguessing

not quite sure pretty

sure

Page 29: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

ConcepTest data

% correct answers

100

80

60

40

20afte

r di

scus

sion

100806040200

before discussion

0

Page 30: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

ConcepTest data

% correct answers

100

80

60

40

20afte

r di

scus

sion

100806040200

before discussion

0

Page 31: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

ConcepTest data

optimumrange

100

80

60

40

20afte

r di

scus

sion

100806040200

before discussion

0

Page 32: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Page 33: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Demonstrations: entertainment or education?

Page 34: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Demonstrations: entertainment or education?

Confusion: how real is it?

Page 35: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Demonstrations: entertainment or education?

Confusion: how real is it?

Page 36: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What is the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

menwomen

Force Concept Inventory posttest scores

Page 37: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What is the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

menwomen

gender gap

Force Concept Inventory posttest scores

Page 38: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What is the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

menwomen

gender gap

Page 39: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What is the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

UMN

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

menwomen

gender gap

Page 40: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What is the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

UMN Harvard WPI

Gap is widespread

Page 41: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

Page 42: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

US

FCI posttest

Is it cultural?

Page 43: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

US Belgium

FCI posttest

Page 44: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

20

15

10

5

0

gen

der

gap

(%)

US Belgium Taiwan

FCI posttest

Strong dependence on culture!

Page 45: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

none HS AP

women FCI pretest

What is the effect of precollege education?

Page 46: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

none HS AP

FCI pretest men

Everyone gains...

Page 47: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

none HS AP

... but gap persists ...

Page 48: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What causes the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

none HS AP

118

57

108108

1518

...and women underrepresented in AP courses

Page 49: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

Page 50: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

Compare three pedagogies:

Traditional lecture (T)

Interactive lecture (I)

Interactive lecture and sections,reading assignments (I+)

Page 51: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

T I I+

women FCI pretest

Does pedagogy help?

Page 52: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

T I I+

menFCI pretest

Does pedagogy help?

Page 53: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

T I I+

FCI posttest

Does pedagogy help?

Page 54: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

ave

rage

sco

re (

%)

T I I+

FCI posttest

Yes, pedagogy narrows gap

Page 55: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

pretest: 70%posttest: 90%

20% gain

Who are the low-gain students?

Page 56: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

women

Traditional class

Page 57: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

menwomen

Traditional class

Page 58: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

menwomen

Traditional class: gender imbalance

Page 59: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

menwomen

Interactive class

Page 60: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

What can we do about the gender gap?

100

80

60

40

20

0

gain

(%

)

100806040200

pretest score (%)

menwomen

Interactive class: gender balance

Page 61: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Summary

Gap comes from culture and background

Page 62: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Summary

Gap comes from culture and background

Interaction makes a difference!

Page 63: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Demonstrations: entertainment or education?

Confusion: how real is it?

Page 64: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Modes of Presentation

• no demo

• present

• predict

• discuss

Page 65: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Follow-up

Web-based test (free response)

Final exam question

Page 66: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Loaded Beam Demo

Page 67: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Web-based Test Question

?

? ?

?

10 10

Page 68: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Answers

20 0

15 5

correct (mentions torque)

24% of students

Page 69: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Answers

20 0 20 0

15 5 15 5

correct (mentions torque) proportional reasoning

24% of students 38% of students

Page 70: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Answers

10 10

10 10

independent of position qualitative reasoning

20% of students 10% of students

6% of students do not balance forces2% give other incorrect answers

Page 71: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

‘Understanding’ affects Memory

“As demonstrated in lecture, both scales will read 10N,

regardless of where the center of mass is located. The

platform and the metal block form one unit that is being

measured, so the scales show two evenly distributed read-

ings, no matter where the metal block is placed along the

platform.”

Page 72: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Preliminary Analysis

correct incorrect

no demo 30% 70%

present 18% 82%

predict 29% 71%

discuss 30% 70%

Page 73: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Preliminary Analysis

correct incorrect

no demo 30% 70%

present 18% 82%

predict 29% 71%

discuss 30% 70%

Just presenting harmful?

Page 74: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Exam Question

A uniform plank is supported

by two ropes at points P and Q.

The tension in the rope at P is

150 N. The point at which the

other rope is attached to the

plank is now moved to point R

halfway between Q and the

center of the plank. What are

the tensions in the two ropes?

P QR

150 N

Page 75: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Correct Answer

P QR

150 N

P QR

100 N 200 N

36% of students(30% w. corr. reasoning)

considerable improvement from web test

Page 76: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Incorrect Answers

moment arm for Q reduced by factor of 2

P QR

150 N

P QR

75 N 225 N300 N

12% of students13% of students

moment arms compare as 1:3

Page 77: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Incorrect Answers

( 38 ) 300 N = 112.5 N ( 5

8 ) 300 N = 187.5 N

P QRP QR

112.5 N 112.5 N

1% of students8% of students

ropes only need to support 34 of plankrope supports38 of the plank

rope supports58 of the plank

Page 78: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Analysis

correct balances no cleartorques reasoning

no demo 31% 53% 42%

present 42% 55% 42%

predict 41% 65% 32%

discuss 46% 85% 15%

Page 79: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Conclusion

Demonstration without engagement not very helpful

Much more data to be analyzed!

Page 80: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Research Sampler

Gender and physics

Demonstrations: entertainment or education?

Confusion: how real is it?

Page 81: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Questions

What do students get out of their reading assignments?

Page 82: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Questions

What do students get out of their reading assignments?

What confuses them?

Page 83: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Questions

What do students get out of their reading assignments?

What confuses them?

How real is this confusion?

Page 84: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading Assignment Question

pivot

bicepshumerus

In the figure below, if you were to put the ball not in the palm of your handas shown, but on your forearm, halfway between your elbow and your hand,would it be harder, equally hard, or easier to lift it? Explain briefly.

Page 85: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Coding of Responses

1. answer

2. conceptual model

3. degree of confusion expressed

4. length of answer

Page 86: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Correct Answers

less torque exerted by ball on arm

Page 87: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Correct Answers

less torque exerted by ball on arm

38% of students

Page 88: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Correct Answers

less torque exerted by ball on armsmaller distance raised: less work required

(or: mechanical advantage of lever arm)

38% of students 6% of students

Page 89: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Incorrect Answers

smaller moment arm: need larger forcesmaller distance raised: greater force

required to do same work

27% of students 8% of students

Page 90: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Incorrect Answers

smaller rotational inertiadistance to pivot smaller:easier/harder (no reasoning)

6% of students 3% of students

6% of students give other incorrect answers6% do not answer question

Page 91: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Correlation to Physics Background

torque other

none 26% 74%

high school 36% 64%

AP/college 46% 54%

Page 92: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Confusion

Which students claim being confused?

Page 93: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Confusion

Which students claim being confused?

2/3 of students with correct answers, but only

1/2 of students with incorrect answer!

Page 94: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Reading Assignment Questions

P

Q

Consider the capillary rise of a liquid in a glasstube. How does the pressure at point P at thesurface of the liquid compare to the pressureat point Q at equal height?

A B

PTwo identical balloons are connected to atube as shown below. Balloon B is inflatedmore than balloon A. Which way does the airflow when valve P is opened?

Page 95: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Sample Response

1. Capillary action is due to the cohesion between water molecules, and theadhesion of water to the surface of the glass tube. Negative pressures canresult from the cohesive forces of water. At the same height, the pressureinside the tube is much less due to negative pressures.

2. The air flows from high pressure to low pressure. The fully blown up bal-loon has higher pressure than the 1/2 blown up balloon. So the air flowsfrom the fully blown balloon to the half filled balloon.

3. Nothing was difficult or confusing. The sections on the surfactant in thelungs and the heart as a pump were interesting because they relate physics tobiology.

Page 96: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Sample Response

1. Capillary action is due to the cohesion between water molecules, and theadhesion of water to the surface of the glass tube. Negative pressures canresult from the cohesive forces of water. At the same height, the pressureinside the tube is much less due to negative pressures.

2. The air flows from high pressure to low pressure. The fully blown up bal-loon has higher pressure than the 1/2 blown up balloon. So the air flowsfrom the fully blown balloon to the half filled balloon.

3. Nothing was difficult or confusing. The sections on the surfactant in thelungs and the heart as a pump were interesting because they relate physics tobiology.

WRONG

Page 97: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Sample Response

1. Capillary action is due to the cohesion between water molecules, and theadhesion of water to the surface of the glass tube. Negative pressures canresult from the cohesive forces of water. At the same height, the pressureinside the tube is much less due to negative pressures.

2. The air flows from high pressure to low pressure. The fully blown up bal-loon has higher pressure than the 1/2 blown up balloon. So the air flowsfrom the fully blown balloon to the half filled balloon.

3. Nothing was difficult or confusing. The sections on the surfactant in thelungs and the heart as a pump were interesting because they relate physics tobiology.

WRONG

WRONG

Page 98: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Sample Response

1. Capillary action is due to the cohesion between water molecules, and theadhesion of water to the surface of the glass tube. Negative pressures canresult from the cohesive forces of water. At the same height, the pressureinside the tube is much less due to negative pressures.

2. The air flows from high pressure to low pressure. The fully blown up bal-loon has higher pressure than the 1/2 blown up balloon. So the air flowsfrom the fully blown balloon to the half filled balloon.

3. Nothing was difficult or confusing. The sections on the surfactant in thelungs and the heart as a pump were interesting because they relate physics tobiology.

WRONGWRONG

Page 99: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Another Response

1. The water rises because of an interaction between the water and the wallsof the tube. This interaction creates an upward force which causes the waterto rise. The force is due to surface tension between the water and the walls ofthe tube. The pressure at the point inside the tube must be the same as thepressure at the point of equal height outside the tube, because if there was apressure difference, then there would be a net flow of water, into or out of thetube, until the pressure difference was equalized.

2. Laplace's law tells us that it requires a greater pressure difference to main-tain a small sphere than a larger one. So, the pressure in the small balloonmust be greater, and the air will flow from the small balloon into the largeone.

3. I found the explanation of Laplace's law to be inadequate, and while I canunderstand the conclusion drawn, I don't understand the reasoning which ledto the conclusion.

Page 100: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Another Response

1. The water rises because of an interaction between the water and the wallsof the tube. This interaction creates an upward force which causes the waterto rise. The force is due to surface tension between the water and the walls ofthe tube. The pressure at the point inside the tube must be the same as thepressure at the point of equal height outside the tube, because if there was apressure difference, then there would be a net flow of water, into or out of thetube, until the pressure difference was equalized.

2. Laplace's law tells us that it requires a greater pressure difference to main-tain a small sphere than a larger one. So, the pressure in the small balloonmust be greater, and the air will flow from the small balloon into the largeone.

3. I found the explanation of Laplace's law to be inadequate, and while I canunderstand the conclusion drawn, I don't understand the reasoning which ledto the conclusion.

YES!

Page 101: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Another Response

1. The water rises because of an interaction between the water and the wallsof the tube. This interaction creates an upward force which causes the waterto rise. The force is due to surface tension between the water and the walls ofthe tube. The pressure at the point inside the tube must be the same as thepressure at the point of equal height outside the tube, because if there was apressure difference, then there would be a net flow of water, into or out of thetube, until the pressure difference was equalized.

2. Laplace's law tells us that it requires a greater pressure difference to main-tain a small sphere than a larger one. So, the pressure in the small balloonmust be greater, and the air will flow from the small balloon into the largeone.

3. I found the explanation of Laplace's law to be inadequate, and while I canunderstand the conclusion drawn, I don't understand the reasoning which ledto the conclusion.

YES!

YES!

Page 102: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Another Response

1. The water rises because of an interaction between the water and the wallsof the tube. This interaction creates an upward force which causes the waterto rise. The force is due to surface tension between the water and the walls ofthe tube. The pressure at the point inside the tube must be the same as thepressure at the point of equal height outside the tube, because if there was apressure difference, then there would be a net flow of water, into or out of thetube, until the pressure difference was equalized.

2. Laplace's law tells us that it requires a greater pressure difference to main-tain a small sphere than a larger one. So, the pressure in the small balloonmust be greater, and the air will flow from the small balloon into the largeone.

3. I found the explanation of Laplace's law to be inadequate, and while I canunderstand the conclusion drawn, I don't understand the reasoning whichled to the conclusion.

YES!

YES!

Page 103: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Coding of Responses

1. correct/incorrect answer

2. confusion on topic of question

Page 104: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Result

capillarity correct incorrect

confused 44% 56%

not confused 25% 75%

Laplace correct incorrect

confused 49% 51%

not confused 21% 79%

Page 105: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Conclusion

Confusion is not a bad thing…

but it can be a serious obstacle to education reform.

Page 106: IMPROVING EDUCATION THROUGH RESEARCH Catherine Crouch Paul … · Paul Callan Emily Fair Oster Eric Mazur Harvard University Hong Kong University 21 October 1999. Peer Instruction

Funding

National Science Foundation

For a copy of this talk andadditional information:

http://mazur-www.harvard.edu