www.improverproject.eu@improverproject

2ND IMPROVER/ ERNCIPWORKSHOPIMPROVEDRISKEVALUATIONANDIMPLEMENTATIONOFRESILIENCECONCEPTSTOCRITICAL

INFRASTRUCTURE

DavidLange,RISEResearchInstitutesofSwedendavid.lange@ri.se

Assessmentofcriticalinfrastructureresilience§ There are several nationaldefinitionsof CIResilience inEurope

§ There isnoEUdefinitionof theterm

§ Mostofficial European documents refer to societal resilience§ e.g. EUStrategyforSupportingDisasterRiskReductioninDevelopingCountries

§ Relativelysmallbodyofworkfocussingonimplementationofresiliencetoinfrastructure:§ ArgonnelaboratoriesRMI§ AIICGuidelinesforcriticalinfrastructureresilienceevaluation§ Hollnagels ResilienceAssessmentGrid

§ Allrelyonasummationofdifferentlevelsofindicators

Analysingresilience(1)§ Guidelinesforcriticalinfrastructures

resilienceevaluation(AIIC)§ BenchmarkResilienceTool(Resilient

Organisations)

Analysingresilience(2)§ ResilienceMeasurementIndexand

InfrastructureSurveyTool(Argonne)

Measuringresilience(3)§ ResilienceAssessmentGrid

CriticalInfrastructureResilienceIndex(IMPROVER)§ Level1– thecrisis

managementcycle

§ Level2– genericindicators

§ Level3– given,measureableindicators§ Technological

§ Organisational

§ …

§ Level4– Sector/applicationspecific,measurableindicators

X1.2.l

...X1.2.b

Thecontext(Domain,Hazard,Situation)

A B C D E F GLevel1Given

B1Level2Given,A/NA,Additionspossible

B2

Bn

B1.1

B1.2

B1.m

Level3Mainlygiven,A/NA,Weighted,Additionspossible

Transformationofspecificindicatormetricstoprocessmaturitylevels

X1.2.a

Level4Specificindiactors

CIRIAccumulatedresilience

index

§ Cobit1. Non-existing

2. Initial/ad-hoc

3. Repeatablebutintuitive

4. Definedprocess

5. Managedandmeasurable

6. Optimised

§ Measured/Calculated

Discussion§ Theintendeduseofthesemethodologiesvariessignificantly§ Comparisonagainstsimilarinfrastructuresororganisations§ Measuringtheresilienceofasingleasset§ Monitoringresilienceovertime

§ Radarcharts

§ Maturityscales

IMPROVERFramework

§ WeproposeageneralframeworkforresilienceassessmentofCI,whichremainscompatiblewiththecurrentguidelinesfortheMS

§ IntegratestheparadigmofresilienceintotheRAprocessaccordingtoISO31000

§ Consistsofthreelevels,namelythe§ (a)asset (focusonindividualCIassets),§ (b)system (focusondependenciesbetweenCIassets)and§ (c)nationalor regional (focusonsocietalaspects)levels

§ Outputsriskandresiliencetreatmentplansonbothanassetandasystemlevel

§ Flexible– neitherdomainoranalysismethodologydependent

ThesuccessfulimplementationoftheconceptofresiliencetoCIreliesonitssuccessfulintegrationinexistingsecurityactivities;includingtheriskassessmentsataCIoperator,asystemandanational(orregional)level.

9

Definitions§ StartingfromdefinitionsusedinISO31000forRAwemapthesetoresilience:§ Resilienceanalysisistheprocesstocomprehendandtodeterminethelevelofresilience,basedonselectedresilienceindicators

§ Resilienceevaluationistheprocessofcomparingtheresultsofresilienceanalysiswithcriteriaorobjectivestodeterminewhetherresiliencelevelisacceptableandidentifyareasforimprovement

§ Resilienceassessmentistheoverallprocessofresilienceanalysisandevaluation§ Resiliencetreatmentis theprocesstomodifyresilience,focusingontheabsorptive,adaptiveorrestorativecapacity

§ Resiliencemanagementcomprisescoordinatedactivitiestodirectandcontrolanorganisationwithregardtoitsresilience,includingtheaboveprocesses

ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchandinnovationprogrammeundergrantagreementno.653390

DavidLange,RISEResearchInstitutesofSwedendavid.lange@ri.se