Improved and Hybrid PV

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    1/6

    Improved and Hybrid PV/Wind Energy System

    C. Ravi Chandran1, S. Vasanth Kumar2

    1IV Year, EEE University College of Engineering, Anna University, Tuticorin campus, Chennai.2IV Year, EEE, University College of Engineering, Anna University, Tuticorin campus, Chennai.

    Email:[email protected],[email protected].

    Abstract - This Paper presents an improved and hybrid PV/Wind

    energy system along with a new three-input DC - DC boost

    converter. Renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic source,

    wind sources are used for hybridization of the DC-DC boost

    converter. The excessive power demand problems can be solved by

    this method. A unidirectional port for the input power sources, a

    bidirectional port for a storage element, and an output port for load

    are interfaced along with the converter. The method has several

    advantages such as bidirectional power flow at the storage port,

    simple structure, low-power components, centralized control,

    eliminating the need of transformer, low weight, high-stability

    working point, independent operation of input power sources, and

    high level of boosting. The results and the output are verified bysimulation in MATLAB/SIMLINK for different load condition.

    I ndex TermsPhotovoltaic source, wind sources,MPPT, DC DC

    boost converter, MATLAB/Simulation software

    I.INTRODUCTION

    The photovoltaic (PV) has properties such as noiseless, non-

    pollutant and little maintenance. But this PV energy depends

    on unpredictable shadows, sun irradiation level and ambient

    temperature. So, Wind Energy is used as an additional source

    which has the advantage of cleanness, high efficiency and

    high reliability. Batteries are used for storage purposes andimproves the output power capacity. This forms the Hybrid

    system.

    Wind and photovoltaic energy are unreliable as they are

    inrtermittent. By introducing maximum power point tracking

    (MPPT) algorithms and combining them, the above

    disadvantage can be overcome. the systems power transfer

    efficiency and reliability can be improved significantly. When

    any source is unavailable or insufficient in meeting the load

    demands, the other energy source can compensate.

    The main shortcomings of these traditional integrating

    methods are complex system topology, high count of devices,high power losses, expensive cost, and large size. In recent

    years, several power conversion stages used in traditional

    hybrid systems are replaced by multi-input converters

    (MICs), which combine different power sources in a single

    power structure. These converters have received more

    attention in the literature because of providing simple circuit

    topology, centralized control, bidirectional power flow for the

    storage element, high reliability, and low manufacturing cost

    and size. In general, the systematic approach of generating

    MICs is introduced, in which the concept of the pulsating

    voltage source cells and the pulsating current source cells is

    proposed for deriving MICs. One of the samples of these

    MICs is utilized to hybridize PV and wind power sources in a

    unified structure. Besides, a systematic method to synthesize

    MICs is proposed in [15]. This paper deals with two types of

    MICs: in the first type, only one power source is allowed to

    transfer energy to the load at a time, and in the second type,

    all the input sources can deliver power to the load either

    individually or simultaneously.

    Two multiple-input converters based on flux additively in a

    multiwinding transformer are reported in [17] and [18].

    Because there was no possibility of bidirectional operating ofthe converter in [17], and complexity of driving circuits and

    output power limitation in [18], they are not suitable for

    hybrid systems. In [19], a three-port bidirectional converter

    with three active full bridges, two series-resonant tanks, and a

    threewinding high-frequency transformer are proposed. In

    comparison with three-port circuits with only inductors and

    diode bridge at the load side, it gives higher boost gain and

    reduced switching losses due to soft-switching operation. A

    family of multiport converters based on combination of dc

    link and magnetic coupling by utilizing half-bridge boost

    converter system features minimum number of conversion

    steps, low cost, and compact packaging. In [21], the input

    output feedback control linearization for a dc acbidirectional MIC composing a high-frequency isolating link

    transformer, two half-bridge boost converters at the input

    ports and a bidirectional cycloconverter at the output port is

    proposed. In [22][24], three MICs are proposed based on

    structure of the dcdc boost converter. The dcdc boost

    converter in [22] is useful for combining several energy

    sources whose power capacity or voltage levels are different.

    The multi-input dcdc converter has the capability of

    operating in different converter topologies (buck, boost, and

    buckboost) in addition to its bidirectional operation and

    positive output voltage without any additional transformer. A

    three-input dcdc boost converter can combine a PV, an FC,

    and a battery in a simple unified structure. A comprehensivepower management algorithm is realized in order to achieve

    maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of the PV source and

    set the FC in its optimal power operation range. A three-port

    isolated full bridge topology is proposed in [3] for hybrid

    FC/battery system, which its aim is feeding a small

    autonomous load. This topology gains the advantage of

    bidirectional power flow due to the active full-bridges in each

    port.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    2/6

    II.

    DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVED SYSTEM

    The given block diagram consists of two Input stage solar,

    Wind and Bidirectional storage Battery, Multi input DC- DC

    Boost converter, MOSFET /IGBT driver stage, Logic Stage,

    Inverter and load. The solar panel acts as one of source to the

    DC-DC converter. The DC output from the solar panel is

    given at one port of the integrated four port DC-DC converter.

    By switching ON and OFF the power devices the DC input is

    transferred to the inverter.

    Fig 1.Functional Block diagram of Hybrid System

    The system has 4 ports. The first port is solar power acts as an

    port and the second port is DC output from the rectifier

    supplied form the wind mill act as another port. Battery acts

    as an another port and also act as storage port. All this port

    supply the power to the DC-DC converter. Load port act as an

    fourth port. The bi-directional storage port battery is used to

    supply power as well as act as storage and save excess power.

    The DC-DC converter integrates all the power and

    synchronizes the supply to the output via inverter. Th DC-DC

    converter is an half bridge converter with two diodes and two

    switches. According to the MPPT algorithm and PWM pulses

    the switching sequences is depend on the power switch ON

    and OFF. The output of the DC-DC converter is connected to

    an inverter.

    The power switches are turned ON and OFF depending on the

    switching sequence developed under different source

    conditions with different independent duty ratios and the

    output DC boosts up the input and the boosted up voltage is

    supplied to the inverter. The inverter inverts the supplied DC

    power to AC power. The AC power is supplied to the AC

    load. The AC load can be for any AC utilities.

    The inverter is made of four power switches in which PWM

    signals are developed and switching sequences decide ON

    and OFF states of power switches in different timing

    sequence and these control the power switches and invert the

    DC output from the DC-DC converter to AC output and

    supplied to the load. The output of the inverter is AC and this

    can supply power to utilities with AC supply.

    III.

    CONVERTER OPERATION

    Fig 2.Circuit for DCDC Boost Converter and Load

    The above circuit shows the representation of three input DC-

    DC converter. From the figure, the converter interfaces two

    input power sources v1 and v2, and a battery as the storage

    element. Therefore, v1and v2are shown as two independent

    power sources that their output characteristics are determinedby the type of input power sources.

    The RL is the load resistance, which can represent the

    equivalent power feeding an inverter. Four power switches S 1,

    S2, S3, and S4 in the converter structure are the main

    controllable elements that control the power flow of the

    hybrid power system. The circuit enables the switches to be

    independently controlled through four independent duty ratios

    d1, d2, d3, and d4respectively.

    The converter switches S3 and S4 are turned ON, their

    corresponding diodes D3 and D4 are reversely biased by the

    battery voltage and then blocked. On the other hand, turn OFF state of these switches makes diodes D3and D4able to

    conduct input currents iL1 and iL2. In the improved power

    system applications, the input power sources should be

    explored in continuous current mode (CCM).The current

    ripple of the input sources should be minimized to make an

    exact power balance among the input powers and the load.

    Assuming the same saw tooth wave form to all the switches

    and d3, d4

  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    3/6

    Fig 3. Switching state 1: 0< t< d1 T.

    In this operation mode, two input power sources v1and v2are

    responsible for supplying the load, and battery charging/

    discharging is not done. This operation mode is considered as

    the basic operation mode of the converter. As clearly seen

    from the converter structure, there are two options to conduct

    input power sources currents iL1 and iL2 without passing

    through the battery path 1: S4D3, path 2: S3D4. In this

    operation mode, the first path is chosen therefore, switch S3is

    turned OFF while switch S4is turned ON entirely

    Fig 4.Switching state 2: d1T< t < d2T.

    Fig 5.Switching state 3 (d2T < t < T)

    in the switching period (d4 = 1 and d3 = 0). Thus, three

    different switching states of the converter are achieved in one

    switching period.

    Fig 6.Steady-state waveform of converter in first

    operation modeSecond power operation

    In this operation mode, two input power sources V1

    andV2along with the battery are responsible for supplying

    Fig 7.Switching state 1: 0 < t < d4T.

    the load. Therefore, discharging state of the battery should be

    provided in this operation mode. Referring to the converter

    topology, when switches S3 and S4 are turned ON

    simultaneously, currents iL1and iL2are conducted through the

    path of switch S4, the battery, and switch S3which results in

    battery discharging. However, discharging operations of the

    battery can only last until switches S1 and/or S2 are

    conducting. As a result, the maximum discharge power of the

    battery depends on duty ratios of d1and d2as well as currents

    iL1 and iL2.

  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    4/6

    Fig 8.Switching state 2: d4T< t < d1T

    Fig 9. Switching state 3: d1T < t < d2T.

    Therefore, in order to acquire a desired maximum discharging

    power of the battery, the input power sources is designed in

    proper current and voltage values. On the other hand,

    regulating the discharging power of the battery below

    Fig 10.Switching state 4: d2T < t

  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    5/6

    Fig 13. Switching state 2 (d3T < t < d1T)

    Fig 14. Switching state 3 (d1T < t < d2T)

    Fig 15 Switching state 4 (d2T < t < T))

    operation mode. As per the converter topology, when

    switches S3and S4 are turned OFF, by turning ON switches S1

    and S2, currents iL1 and iL2are conducted through the path of

    diode D4 , the battery, and diode D3, therefore, the condition

    of battery charging is provided. The charging operation of the

    battery can only last until switches S1 and/or S2 are

    conducting. As a result, the maximum charge power of the

    battery depends on duty ratios d1 and d2as well as currents iL1

    and iL2 OFF.

    Therefore, in order to acquire a desired maximum

    charge power of the battery, the input power sources shouldbe designed in proper current and voltage values. On the other

    hand, regulating the charging power of the battery below the

    Pmax bat.ch can be made by changing the state of only one of

    switches S3and S4before switches S1and S2are turned OFF

    (according to the assumption d3,d4< min (d1,d2 )). In order to

    regulate the charging power of the battery, switch S3 is

    controlled by regarding the fact that when switch S3is turned

    ON, the charging power of the battery is not accomplished

    while its turn-off state make the battery to be charged with

    currents iL1and iL2 through the path of D3.

    VI. Test Results

    A. Test Results for Output Voltage

    B.Test Result for Output Current

    C. Test Result for battery output

    D. Test Result for Solar Energy

    E. Test Result for Wind Energy

  • 8/12/2019 Improved and Hybrid PV

    6/6

    VII. Experimental verification

    The Graph had shown the output voltage and output

    current of the proposed hybrid system. Thus verify the

    MATLAB simulation block diagram used in this investigation

    is valid for the system used.

    IX. Conclusion and future scope

    This project multi input DC-DC boost converter is

    most efficient with renewable energy resources to meet the

    present prevailing energy demand. The output of wind and

    solar given to DC DC boost converter improves the quality

    of output obtained and also eliminates the requirement offilter and transformer section. Another advantage of this

    project is that if any input source is removed off the system

    can operate as a stand-alone system providing a continuous

    output.

    This project will be more suitable to meet the energy

    demand in residential and industrial sectors. The size of the

    wind turbine can be increased for higher power production.

    Similarly the MPPT can also be changed for maximum

    power. With Suitable improvement in wind energy generation

    and solar power generation the output power can be directly

    connected with the grid to meet the energy demand. By also

    suitable improvement in the hardware design can also lead to

    improved efficiency

    X. References

    1.Chuang Y. C. and Ke. Y. L., High- efficiency and low-

    stress ZVT-PWM DC-to-DC converter for battery charger,

    Aug.2008.

    2.Chen Y. M., Liu Y. Ch., Hung S. C., and Cheng C. S.,

    Multi-input inverter for grid-connected hybrid PV/Wind

    power system, May 2007.

    3.

    Chen Y. M., Liu. Y. Ch. and Wu. F. Y., Multi -input

    DC/DC converter based on the multi winding transformer

    for renewable energy applications, Jul./Aug. 2002.

    4.

    Duarte .J. L, Hendrix .M, and Simoes .M.G, Three-port

    bidirectional converter for hybrid fuel cell systems, Mar.2007.

    5.

    Gopinath .R., Kim. S., Hahn, J. H., Enjeti. P. N., Yeary M.

    B., and Howze, J. W., Development of a low cost fuel cell

    inverter system with DSP control, Sep. 2004.

    6.Huang X., Wang. X., Nergaard. T., Lai. J. S., Xu. X., and

    Zhu L., Parasitic ringing and design issues of digitally

    controlled high power interleaved boost converters, Sep.

    2004.

    7.

    Jiang.W and Fahimi.b, Active current sharing and source

    management in fuel cell-battery hybrid power system,

    Feb. 2010.

    8.

    Kato. N, Kurozumi .K, Susuld . N, and Muroyama. S,

    Hybrid power supply system composed of photovoltaic

    and fuel-cell systems, 2001.

    9. Liu. Y. Ch. and Chen. Y.M., A systematic approach to

    synthesizing multi input DCDC converters, Jan. 2009.

    10. Kwasinski A., Identification of feasible topologies for

    multiple-input DCDC converters, Mar. 2010.

    11.

    Krishnaswami. H and Mohan. N., Three-port series-

    resonant DCDC converter to interface renewable energy

    sources with bidirectional load and energy storage ports,

    Mar. 2009.

    12.

    Matsuo H, Lin.W, Kurokawa. F, Shigemizu.T, and

    Watanabe. N, Characteristics of the multiple-input DC

    DC converter, Jun. 2004.

    13.

    Onara. O. C., Uzunoglu. M, and Alam. M. S., Modeling,

    control and simulation of an autonomous wind

    turbine/photovoltaic/fuel cell/ultra capacitor hybrid

    power system, J.Apr. 2008.

    14. Peng F. Z., H. Li, G. J. Su, and Lawler J. S., A new

    ZVS bidirectional dcdc converter for fuel cell andbattery application, Jan. 2004.

    15.

    Rajashekara.K, Hybrid fuel-cell strategies for clean

    power generation, May/Jun. 2005.

    16.

    Reddy. K. N. and Agrawal. V., Utility-interactive

    hybrid distributed generation scheme with compensation

    featureSep. 2007.

    17.

    Sarhangzadeh M., Hosseini S. H., Sharifian M. B. B., and

    Gharehpetian G. B. Multi-input direct DCAC

    converter with high frequency link for clean power

    generation systems, Jun. 2011.

    18. Thounthong .P, Rael. S, and Davat. B., Control strategy

    of fuel cell and supercapacitor association for a

    distributed generation system, Dec. 2007.19. Yan L., Xinbo R., Dongsheng Y., Fuxin L. Synthesis of

    multiple-input DC/DC converters, Sep. 2010.

    20.

    Tao.H, Kotsopoulos.A, Duarte J. L., and M. A. M.

    Hendrix, Family of multiport bidirectional DCDC

    converters, 2006