17
Thomas Maguire, MassDEP March 2014 Climate Change Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts

Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

Thomas Maguire, MassDEP March 2014

Climate Change Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts

Page 2: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R² = 0.4

46

48

50

52

54

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Tem

pe

ratu

re (

oF)

Boston, MA: Temperature Average Annual 1873 to 2013

2012

2010

1875

1873-2013 Avg: 50.7oF

1881-1910 Avg: 49.4oF

1981-2010 Avg: 51.7oF

Average Compiled from Boston WSFO and NCDC data

Page 3: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R² = 0.04

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Pre

cip

itat

ion

De

pth

(in

che

s/ye

ar)

Boston MA: Precipitation, Annual Depth 1881-2013

1981-2010 Avg: 43.77”

1881-1910 Avg: 40.01”

Annual Total and Averages Compiled from MassDCR and NCDC data

Page 4: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R² = 0.04

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

Pre

cip

itat

ion

De

pth

(in

che

s/d

ay)

Boston, MA: Precipitation, Annual Maxima Daily

1936-2013 Avg: 2.77”

Annual Maxima Series compiled from NCDC data

Page 5: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R² = 0.6

31

33

35

37

39

41

43

45

Nu

mb

er

of

Dai

ly S

torm

s/ye

ar

Boston, MA: Precipitation, Storms ≥ 1.5 in/day

Storms ≥ 1.5” Compiled from NCDC data

Page 6: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

2 yr 24 hr 10 yr 24 hr 25 yr 24 hr 50 yr 24 hr 100 yr 24 hr

Pre

cip

itat

ion

(in

che

s)

Precipitation Return Period Frequency

Boston, MA: Precipitation Return Period Frequency 1961 TP 40 versus 2011 Cornell NRCC

1961 TP40

2011 NRCS-Cornell

26% change

2011 Cornell NRCC

Page 7: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

, Massachusetts

Peak Annual Maxima from USGS Gage #01101500 Data

Page 8: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

Temperate Climate

, MA

Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data

Page 9: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R² = 0.01

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Dis

char

ge (

ft3/s

eco

nd

) Quaboag River near West Brimfield: Average Annual Minima Discharge

Annual Minima and Average compiled from USGS Gage #01176000 Daily Data

Page 10: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

R2=0.9

Mean Tide Data from NOAA Tide Station 8443970

Page 11: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Ru

no

ff R

ate

(fe

et3/s

eco

nd

)

Return Period (years)

EFFECT ON RUNOFF RATE

INCREASE IN FLOW RATE FROM 1961

Based on hypothetical 10-acre parking lot in East Boston location

HISTORIC1961

EXISTING 2011

(TP40)

(Cornell NRCC)

Page 12: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Ru

no

ff R

ate

(fe

et3/s

eco

nd

)

Return Period (years)

PROJECTED 2050

HISTORIC1961

EXISTING 2011

PROJECTED ADDITIONAL INCREASE IN FLOW RATE

Based on hypothetical 10-acre parking lot in East Boston location, with CLIMB projection of 0.31% precipitation increase each year

Page 13: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Ru

no

ff R

ate

(fe

et3/s

eco

nd

)

Return Period (years)

PROJECTED 2050

HISTORIC1961

EXISTING 2011

Based on hypothetical 10-acre parking lot in East Boston location, with CLIMB projection of 0.31% precipitation increase each year

Page 14: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Ru

no

ff R

ate

(fe

et3/s

eco

nd

)

Return Period (years)

PROJECTED 2050

HISTORIC1961

EXISTING 2011

Based on hypothetical 10-acre parking lot in East Boston location, with CLIMB projection of 0.31% precipitation increase each year

Page 15: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near
Page 16: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

Stormwater Management Implications

Probable Cause Possible Effect

More runoff - pipe capacity exceeded CSO/SSO Discharge Frequency Increase

More runoff - pipe capacity exceeded Urban street flooding increase

More runoff - detention basin capacity exceeded

Upstream and downstream river flooding increase, increased scour to stream channels and stream culverts

Less snowpack melt/more runoff/higher ET

Less infiltration to groundwater seasonally: impact to drinking waters, wetlands, aquatic life

Snow/Rain mix change in winter Impacts to drinking water and aquatic life from increased salt use on roads

Elevated runoff temperatures Reduced cold water fishery

Elevated temperature in stormwater treatment systems combined with greater time between storms in summer

Algae blooms & bio-magnification of pathogens in stormwater treatment systems, effect on downstream wetlands

Collection and end-of-pipe Stormwater Treatment Systems in Floodplains (e.g. Detention Basins)

Reduced stormwater treatment on more frequent basis due to inundation from coastal and river flooding

Page 17: Implications for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts · Log Pearson Type III Analysis of USGS Gage #01101500 Data . R² = 0.01 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t 3) Quaboag River near

Adaptation • Current stormwater collection and treatment

practices in Massachusetts are based on 1938 – 1958 hydrology (TP40, published in 1961)

• Stormwater sizing methods currently in use rely on a design storm approach - static assumptions.

• Current actual as well as projected future hydrology for Massachusetts are greater than TP40.

• Low Impact Development and Environmentally Sensitive Site Design practices provide greater flexibility with lack of stationarity to reduce physical impacts to streams and wetlands, reduce impact to aquatic life, induce recharge, lag runoff, and provide stormwater treatment.