9
Implementing School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013 Every Student READY

Implementing School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

  • Upload
    parker

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Every Student READY. Implementing School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013. Legislative Summary. Excellent Public Schools Act 2012 2013 Legislative Session SB 361 (Edition 1) ACT: Meet all 4 ACT benchmarks Weight indicators by number of students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Implementing School Performance

GradesSuperintendents Small Group

MeetingsApril 2013

Every Student READY

Page 2: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Legislative Summary

1. Excellent Public Schools Act 20122. 2013 Legislative Session

a. SB 361 (Edition 1)i. ACT: Meet all 4 ACT benchmarksii. Weight indicators by number of

studentsb. SB 361(Edition 2/PCS)

i. ACT: Meet reading/math benchmarks

c. HB435 and HB719

Page 3: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Additional Analyses: SB361

1. ACT: UNC system minimum of 17 on the composite (reading, math, English, science)

2. Simple weighting (indicators)a. Equal category weighting

i. Testing: 33.3%ii. College readiness: 33.3%iii. Graduation rate: 33.3%

b. Differential category weightingi. Testing: 43.75%ii. College readiness: 43.75%iii. Graduation rate: 12.5%

Page 4: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

A B C D F0

100200300400500600700800900

1000

173

598 573

349

175

474

921

405

54 14

Elementary and Middle School Performance Grades

SB361 HB435

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

Page 5: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

100

20091 122

206

8331

Simple Weighted Average

A B C D F0

100

200

76146

204

8522

Equal Category Weighted Average

A B C D F0

100

200

72107

206

10840

Differential Category Weighted Average Note: These are possible

weighted models that could be used with SB 361 (PCS)

Page 6: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

91

122

206

83

31

76

146

204

85

22

72

107

206

108

40

SimpleEqual CategoryDifferential Category

SB 361 (PCS) Weighted Options

Page 7: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

Number of Schools91

122

206

83

31

SB 361 PCS: Simple Weighted Average – ACT @ 17 UNC Minimum

Page 8: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Simulation Analysis Based on 2011-12 Data

For Discussion Purposes Only – Not Final

A B C D F0

50

100

150

200

250

Number of Schools

33

94

207

154

45

SB 361 PCS: Simple Weighted Average - R/M ACT

Page 9: Implementing  School Performance Grades Superintendents Small Group Meetings April 2013

Questions

Every Student READY