25
Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency March 3, 2014

Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

  • Upload
    oma

  • View
    51

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency. March 3, 2014. Choices. Care Management Entity System of Care Wraparound Managed Care Established in 1997 Over 1500 youth served daily. Agenda. Choices experience with the WFI Integrating the WFI-EZ into Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

March 3, 2014

Page 2: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Choices

• Care Management Entity– System of Care– Wraparound– Managed Care

• Established in 1997

• Over 1500 youth served daily

Page 3: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Agenda

• Choices experience with the WFI

• Integrating the WFI-EZ into Practice

• Using the WFI for Quality Improvement

Page 4: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Experience with WFI 3.0 and 4.0

• Wraparound Comparison Study– Dawn Project– University of Maryland

• Choices Technical Assistance Center– Subcontractor– Choices Outcomes and Evaluation Staff

Page 5: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Experience with WFI 3.0 and 4.0

• Advantages– External evaluation– Trained interviewers– Alignment with phases and principles

• Disadvantages– Staff resources– Completion rates– Limited assessment options

Page 6: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

WFI-EZ

• Short-form– Wraparound Fidelity– Youth Outcomes– Satisfaction

• Self-Report– Paper– On-line– Interview

Page 7: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Part 1

Integrating the WFI-EZ into Practice

Page 8: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Administration Options

• On-line– Care Coordinators introduce– Email to caregivers– Survey Monkey

• Challenges– Caregivers have limited access to Internet– Reading levels

Page 9: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Administration Options

• Paper– Care Coordinators introduce– CCs give survey to families• Sign sealed envelope and return• Mail in stamped envelope

• Challenges– Potential for bias– Reading levels

Page 10: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Administration Options

• Interviews– Program staff– CCs introduces– Conducted by phone

• Challenges– Resource cost– Successful contacts with caregivers– WFI-EZ format

Page 11: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Implementation Process

• Allowed sites to select method

• Generated random samples

• CCs completed WFI-EZ on one youth

• 30 days to get completed surveys from caregivers

Page 12: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Results

• 3 of 4 sites selected paper surveys

• 1 site conducted phone interviews

• Response rates– Interviews (44%)– Paper (22-36%)

Page 13: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Results

• Consistent data quality

• Bias from CC involvement not observed

• Cost/benefit analysis

Page 14: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Next Steps

• 2nd administration underway

• Improve CC introduction to WFI-EZ

• Formalize mechanism for returning paper surveys

• Incentives for caregivers and youth

Page 15: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Part 2

Using the WFI-EZ for Quality Improvement

Page 16: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Importance of the WFI-EZ

• Family voice

• Fidelity monitoring vs. task management

• Opportunities for quality improvement

Page 17: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Quality Improvement

• Multiple levels of analysis

• Opportunities for celebration

• Common areas for improvement

• Site-specific strengths and needs

Page 18: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

18

Total Caregiver Fidelity Score

High Fidelity (85% and above)Good Fidelity (75% - 84%)Adequate Fidelity (65% - 74%)

WFI Louisiana - October 2013

Page 19: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Wraparound Fidelity Principles

Outcomes Based

Teamwork Natural Supports

Needs Based Strength and family driven

WFI Total Score

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Wraparound

Adequate

Not Wraparound

Good

High

Page 20: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Strength and Family Driven

Wraparound

Adequate

Not Wraparound

Good

High

B1: Had

a majo

r role in

choosin

g team

B3: Fam

ily described

vision

B11: Celebrat

e succe

sses a

t each

mee

ting

B14: Stra

tegies ti

ed to

family

likes

B17*: Te

am m

embers

do not underst

and fa

mily

Strength

and family

driven

Overal

l0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 21: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Satisfaction

DC Indiana Louisiana Maryland Choices0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

I am satisfied with the wraparound process in which my family and I have participated.

% o

f Car

egiv

ers S

tron

gly

Agre

e or

Agr

ee

Page 22: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Outcomes

Cause stress or strain on family

Disrupt home life Interfer with success at school

Difficulty developing friendships

Difficulty participating in community activities

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Page 23: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Quality Improvement

• Multiple Levels– Agency– Programs – Teams

• Multiple Data Sources– Fidelity– Process measures– Outcomes

Page 24: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Conclusions

• Integrate WFI-EZ into practice

• Balance response rates and resources

• Quality improvement requires multiple types of data

• Ongoing assessment is important

Page 25: Implementation of the WFI-EZ in a Multi-Site Wraparound Agency

Thank You!

Vicki Sprague Effland, Ph.D.Director, Outcomes and EvaluationChoices, Inc.4701 N. Keystone Ave., #150Indianapolis, IN 46205

(317) 205-8232

[email protected]