Upload
lilliana-dixey
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Impacts of Emission from Power Plants on the Ambient Ozone
Concentration in Southern Taiwan
Yee-Lin Wu and Der Ming Tsai
Department of Environmental EngineeringNational Cheng Kung University
Tainan, Taiwan
October 28, 2003
Annual average concentrations of CO、 SO2、 NO、 O3, PM10 and NMHC in
southern Taiwan
Year CO SO2 NO NO2 O3 PM10 NMHC
1994 0.80 11.2 10.2 25.2 22.7 91.9 0.42
1995 0.74 11.5 10.8 25.8 21.7 89.9 0.43 1996 0.72 10.0 9.49 24.4 24.7 85.2 0.40 1997 0.70 9.06 9.20 24.0 25.6 80.3 0.39 1998 0.71 8.08 9.37 23.7 24.1 72.7 0.37 1999 0.69 7.71 8.60 23.7 25.8 76.8 0.34 2000 0.65 6.83 8.20 22.2 25.8 80.7 0.31 2001 0.67 6.95 6.69 22.4 28.9 73.5 0.30
The fractions of days with PSI>100 each year
in southern Taiwan. Fraction
O3 PM10
1994 15.2% 2.89% 12.3%
1995 13.5% 3.13% 10.3%
1996 14.4% 5.49% 8.89%
1997 11.9% 6.91% 4.99%
1998 11.2% 6.67% 4.50%
1999 10.5% 5.75% 4.71%
2000 10.4% 3.63% 6.81%
2001 8.21% 5.44% 2.77%
Pollutant
The monthly mean concentrations of SO2、 NO、
CO、 NO2、 O3 and PM10 in southern Taiwan.
0.02.04.06.08.0
10.012.014.016.018.020.0
19
94
01
19
94
07
19
95
01
19
95
07
19
96
01
19
96
07
19
97
01
19
97
07
19
98
01
19
98
07
19
99
01
19
99
07
20
00
01
20
00
07
20
01
01
20
01
07
20
02
01
20
02
07
SO
2,
NO
( p
pb
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
CO
( p
pb
)
SO2
NO
CO
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.050.0
199401
199407
199501
199507
199601
199607
199701
199707
199801
199807
199901
199907
200001
200007
200101
200107
200201
200207
NO
2, O
3 (
ppb )
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
PM
10 (
mic
rogr
am/m
3)
NO2
O3
PM10
Emission inventory for PM10、 SOx、 NOx、 VOC and CO in southern
Taiwan. The percentage is for the fraction of
Taiwan. (TEDS 4.3) unit: ton
ton/yr PM10 SOx NOx VOC CO
Taiwan 401589 223357 454950 864236 1488429
Kaohsiung City 13656 46104 45142 83651 93164Tainan City 6414 984 3808 19716 36149
Tainan County 24564 12598 23670 91134 82423
Kaohsiung County 26307 36149 44477 57330 89949PingTung County 16062 2376 7314 22144 46895
TaiPower 135 35809 27597 267 354TaiPower/S.Taiwan 0.2% 36% 22% 0.1% 0.1%
Purposes of Study
• To quantitatively evaluate the impact of Taipower’s plants on the ozone concentrations in the southern Taiwan by using modeling analysis;
• Three scenarios in 1999 were used to evaluate the differences in meteorological conditions.
Characteristics of the three high ozone concentration episodes
PeriodNumber of
sitesexceeding 120
Highest O3cocnentration
, ppb
Site with thehighest O3
cocnentration11 to 14, May 10 163 Annan
23 to 27, September 10 171 Sanmin20 to 27, November 10 180 Chaochou
Characteristics of stacks in the three power plants to be studied
Power Plant Typecapacity(MW)
FuelStack Height
(M)Stack
Diameter (M)SOx
(ppm)NOx
(ppm)
Hsinta steam 500 x 2 coal 250 6.7 45-210 120-210
steam 550 x 2 coal 250 6.7 150-240 175-250
conbined cycle 440 x 5 NG 60 11 <5 10-20
Nanpu conbined cycle 288.8 x 3 NG 60 6 <5 10-20
Talin steam 300 x 2 coal 130 5 200-250 200-250
steam 375 x 2 oil 130 3.78 90-110 90-110
steam 500 x 2 NG 130 6.1 <5 20-70
The emissions of NOx and SO2 from Hsi
nta plant NOx
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8day
Ton
/da
y
1999/05/09
1999/09/21
1999/11/20
SO2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8day
Ton
/da
y
1999/05/09
1999/09/21
1999/11/20
NOx
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
HO
UR
00
HO
UR
02
HO
UR
04
HO
UR
06
HO
UR
08
HO
UR
10
HO
UR
12
HO
UR
14
HO
UR
16
HO
UR
18
HO
UR
20
HO
UR
22
Ton/
hr
1999/05/09
1999/09/21
1999/11/20
SO2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
HO
UR
00
HO
UR
02
HO
UR
04
HO
UR
06
HO
UR
08
HO
UR
10
HO
UR
12
HO
UR
14
HO
UR
16
HO
UR
18
HO
UR
20
HO
UR
22
Ton
/hr
1999/05/09
1999/09/21
1999/11/20
The emissions of NOx and SO2 from Tali
n plant NOx
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8day
Ton/d
ay
36289.00
36424.00
36484.00
SO2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8day
Ton/d
ay
36289.00
36424.00
36484.00
NOx
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
HO
UR
00
HO
UR
02
HO
UR
04
HO
UR
06
HO
UR
08
HO
UR
10
HO
UR
12
HO
UR
14
HO
UR
16
HO
UR
18
HO
UR
20
HO
UR
22
Ton/h
r
1999/5/9
1999/9/21
1999/11/20
SO2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
HO
UR
00
HO
UR
02
HO
UR
04
HO
UR
06
HO
UR
08
HO
UR
10
HO
UR
12
HO
UR
14
HO
UR
16
HO
UR
18
HO
UR
20
HO
UR
22
Ton/h
r
1999/5/9
1999/9/21
1999/11/20
Emission Inventory-TEDS4.3
• Stationary sources– raw data from TEDS 4.3– removal of zero values in TEDS 4.3– using measured data to replace the stack emissi
ons in Giayi county, Tainan county, Kaohsiung city, Kaohsiung county and PingTung county
Emission Inventory-TEDS4.3
• Stationary sources(continue)– The VOCs emissions in Tainan county, Kaohsi
ung city, and Kaohsiung county were replaced by measured data
– The greatest 200 SOx and NOx emission sources in TEDS 4.3 were replaced by data for air pollution fee from Taiwan EPA
– The emission of Taipower’s three power plants were replaced by Taipower’s CEMS data
Emission Inventory-Biogenic sources
• Sources of Land-use– 75 kinds of land-use from Bureau of Forestry
– 7 kinds of land-use from CTCI
Bureau of Forestry CTCI
No. of Land-use 75 7
Totally area(Km2) 16496 30265
Emission Inventory-Biogenic sources
• Treatment of biogenic Land-Use information– To do gridding, Bureau of Forestry’s 75 kinds o
f land-use are used first– CTCI’s data then to be concerned, if Bureau of
Forestry’s data is not reach the max. grid area– Totally area used for this study is 30700 square
km
Input of emission to CCTM for the
simulations in 1999 (ton/yr)
Point Mobile Area bio
PM10 24862 13109 129158PM2_5 15898 7091 69752NH3 82915CO 86087 307269 107120SO2 89911 2166 6912SULF 4732 114 364NO 55370 36716 3871 467NO2 4465 2961 312VOCs Totally 157953 138238 216387 155904ALD2 Acetaldehydes (RCHO, R>H) 1865 4393 2042 12687ETH Ethene (CH2=CH2) 1859 5283 5560FORM Formaldehyde (CH2=O) 11255 1318 977ISOP Isoprene 122 79 274 30694OLE Olefins 11192 3126 8426 5853PAR Paraffins 94745 78882 125693 67325TOL Toluene 10025 12059 39149XYL Xylene 2317 16298 13274TERPB Biogenic terpenes 37324NR 24572 16799 20994 2020
D2
D3
D4
Spatial distributions for the simulated ambient concentrations in layer one. (SO2, NO)
Spatial distributions for the simulated ambient concentrations in layer one. (NO2, O3)
Simulated concentrations of ozone
Time series plot concentrations between simulated a
nd observed results at Fengshan site.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
11/2
0,0
8
16
11/2
1,0
0
8 16
11/2
2,0
0
8 16
11/2
3,0
0
8 16
11/2
4,0
0
8 16
11/2
5,0
0
8 16
11/2
6,0
0
8 16
pp
b
SO2_observed
SO2_Base
SO2_NoTaipowerSO2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
11/2
0,0
8
16
11/2
1,0
0
8 16
11/2
2,0
0
8 16
11/2
3,0
0
8 16
11/2
4,0
0
8 16
11/2
5,0
0
8 16
11/2
6,0
0
8 16
ppb
NO_observed
NO_Base
NO_NoTaipowerNO
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11/2
0,0
8
16
11/2
1,0
0
8 16
11/2
2,0
0
8 16
11/2
3,0
0
8 16
11/2
4,0
0
8 16
11/2
5,0
0
8 16
11/2
6,0
0
8 16
ppb
NO2_observed
NO2_Base
NO2_NoTaipower
NO2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
11/2
0,0
8
16
11/2
1,0
0
8 16
11/2
2,0
0
8 16
11/2
3,0
0
8 16
11/2
4,0
0
8 16
11/2
5,0
0
8 16
11/2
6,0
0
8 16
ppb
O3_observed
O3_Base
O3_NoTaipowerO3
Comparison of wind speeds between simulate
d and observed at Fengshan site.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 105 113 121 129 137 145 153
Wind MM5
Wind Speed.
The wind speed in Fengshan
1999/05-spatial distribution
1999/09-spatial distribution
1999/11-spatial distribution
Conclusions 1. The simulated results by models-3 are on the same order as the observed data for SO2, NO, NO2, and NMHC.
2. The simulated and observed O3 concentrations are in good agreement if the wind speeds simulated by MM5 are not significantly overestimated.
3. The effects of emission from power plants on the O3 concentrations are highly dependent on the meteorological conditions. That is, it varied from case to case.
4. Episode with the highest ozone concentration doesn’t have the greatest impacts.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank EPRI and Taipower for supporting this study. Thanks also go to Dr. Wu at National Taiwan University for running the meteorological simulation in this study. In compiling the emission data, help from many consulting companies were also greatly appreciated.
Future Works
O3(ppb)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
O3(ppb)0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
O3(D)O3(A)
13:20-14:20O3(ppb)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
O3(ppb)0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
O3(D)O3(A)
19:30-20:30
O3(ppb)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
O3(ppb)0 20 40 60 80 100
O3(D)O3(A)
O3(ppb)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Altitude(m)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
O3(ppb)0 10 20 30 40 50 60
O3(D)O3(A)
06:30-08:303/27,2003
20:30-23:003/25,2003
EveningAfternoon
Subsidence
Inversion layer
city
EarlyMorning
Wind
Noon
Wind
water
residual layer residual layer