Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestación

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    1/52

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    2/52

    L.A. Bruijnzeel and W.R.S. Critchley

    0 UNESCO 1994

    Contents

    1. Introduction

    2. Logging systems

    3. Impact of logging on vegetation and soil

    4. Impact on streamflow

    5. Impact on erosion and sedimentation

    6. Impact on the forest nutrient budget

    7. How can logging be improved?

    8. Costs and benefits

    Selected references

    The International Hydrological Programme

    MAB Programme activities in the humid tropics

    3ifgRih

    TROPENBOS

    Netherlands IHP

    Committee

    1

    5

    7

    12

    23

    28

    35

    43

    45

    47

    48

    vrije Universiteit

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    3/52

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Logging

    operations have

    burgeoned in the

    last decades as

    mechanisation has

    enabled the

    exploitation of

    previously

    inaccessible areas

    Explorers and naturalists have long been fascinated by moist

    tropical forests. It is not difficult to see why. The mass of luxuriant

    vegetation and rich diversity of living species represents an eco-

    system that is unrivalled on earth. Such forests provide not just a

    magnificent spectacle and a sanctuary for an incredible array of

    plants and wildlife but also protection for fragile soils against

    erosion and degradation by the torrential rainfall that sustains

    these very forests. But alongside the explorers and naturalists

    came timber merchants. The latter, too, developed a keen interest

    in the forests, but for very different reasons: the vast volumes of

    potentially harvestable timber. Logging operations in tropical

    forest areas have burgeoned in the last decades as mechanis-

    ation has permitted the exploitation of previously inaccessible

    areas, and at an ever-quickening pace.

    Land use alternatives

    There are three main alternatives for land use in areas of moist

    tropical forest. The first is to protect the forest completely and

    prohibit logging or other man-made disturbances. Forests can

    thus be maintained in their natural state for protection of vulnera-

    ble river sources, at the same time providing for (limited) recreat-

    ional activities. However, most tropical forests are concentrated in

    poorer countries which cannot afford the luxury of locking up vast

    portions of their forests in the form of inviolate reserves. The

    second option, and at the other extreme, is to clear the forest and

    use the land for an alternative production function. For example,

    plantation crops such as rubber, cocoa or oil palm may be estab-

    lished, or the forest may be converted into agricultural fields or

    pastures, Clearance for settlements, roads and mines also fall

    into this category. However, whilst reality says that the earths

    natural resources are there to be used, common sense equally

    dictates that these must be managed sensibly and sustainably for

    the benefit of future generations. Forest conversion, therefore,

    can only be successful if it is accompanied by soil and water

    control measures which, in addition, must be applied with a rigour

    that matches the erosivity of tropical rainfall. The widespread

    occurrence of hydrologically and ecologically disrupted land in the

    humid tropics, however, is a sad reminder of our lack of commit-

    ment to the cause of good land husbandry after forest removal.

    1

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    4/52

    No wonder, therefore, that there is increased scope for and inter-

    est in the third option, the management of forest for continued

    production of both timber and other commodities by means of

    some form of selective logging. Whilst it is ominous that currently

    only a tiny proportion of the worlds tropical forests are being

    managed in a fully sustainable manner, the silver lining is that

    relatively simple precautions can lead to substantial improve-

    ments. Indeed, the main tenet of this document is that there is

    room for use without abuse: mankind can reap benefits from this

    rich resource while maintaining its value for the future.

    Exploitation or conservation ?

    The booming exploitation of tropical forests in recent years has

    been matched by growing prophecies of environmental doom. In

    both tropical and temperate countries conservationists have be-

    come increasingly concerned with the welfare of the indigenous

    peoples living in tropical forests as well as with the environmental

    consequences of forest destruction at various levels of scale,

    ranging from the local silting up of streams to changes in the

    global climate. As the environmentalists have become more and

    more vociferous about their views of the impending catastrophes

    accompanying deforestation, a battle between exploiters and

    conservationists has resulted. However, the struggle has been

    emotive, short of hard factual evidence and often divorced from

    the cold light of day. On the one hand, many environmental dis-

    asters, such as floods, droughts or massive landsliding, are often

    hastily blamed on deforestation without taking into account

    climatic variability or geological instability. On the other hand, it is

    an undeniable fact that ruthless logging operations in many parts

    of the tropics have wrought environmental havoc: environmental

    friendliness is rarely the main concern of commercial companies.

    This booklet aims to put the picture into perspective with respect

    to different logging practices. We begin with an analysis of what is

    actually known about the various environmental impacts of log-

    ging. This is then followed by a set of guidelines for simple,

    improved logging practices which are known to keep environment-

    al damage to a minimum. In this way the interests of both envir-

    onmentalists and all that they stand for, and those of the timber

    companies and governments of the countries fortunate enough to

    have such magnificent forests, may be reconciled. As will be de-

    monstrated in our conclusions, ecological benefits and economic

    returns need not be mutually exclusive.

    There is room for

    use without

    abuse:

    mankind can reap

    benefits from this

    rich resource while

    maintaining its value

    for the future

    2

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    5/52

    Many

    environmental

    disasters, such as

    floods and

    droughts, are often

    hastily blamed on

    logging

    3

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    6/52

    4

    Mechanisation has

    largely replaced

    traditional methods

    of logging

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    7/52

    2. LOGGING SYSTEMS

    There is a widespread misconception about the proportion of a

    given forest stand that is felled in logging operations in moist

    tropical forests. It is commonly thought that, as in temperate zone

    forestry, the entire forest is felled and extracted for timber, after

    which replanting may (or may not) follow. In reality, the species

    composition of most tropical forests is so diverse that only a small

    proportion of the trees is suitable for exploitation under current

    marketing conditions. Natural regeneration takes the place of re-

    planting. As an example, even in the very species-rich forests of

    Malaysia, harvesting of all marketable trees would on average re-

    sult in the removal of only about 15 trees per hectare of forest,

    leaving a stump every 25 m or so if the trees had been evenly

    spaced. In the case of the much poorer forests covering much of

    the Amazonian Basin and common in Africa also, a typical count

    would be as low as about eight commercially attractive trees re-

    moved per hectare. Whilst the impact of removing so few trees

    may seem to be limited it should not be forgotten that such

    exploitable trees are often large emergents, which may attain

    heights of 35-50 m and have crowns up to 15 m in diameter.

    When these giants crash they destroy a considerable part of the

    lower stories of the forest. In addition, some of the biggest trees

    may be hollow and this may become apparent only after the tree

    has been felled. As such, more trees will sometimes be felled

    than actually extracted and this of course tends to increase the

    damage to the remaining stand.

    After the marketable trees have been removed, the forest con-

    sists of an irregular mosaic of almost undisturbed cover, pock-

    marked with patches that have been disturbed to varying degrees.

    There are different forms of logging, depending on the intensity of

    the timber harvest, and the interval between logging operations.

    Two main forms are usually distinguished. These are termed

    monocyclic and polycyclic logging.

    Systems of logging

    Monocyclic logging represents the removal of up to 100 of the

    commercially valuable stocking from a forest at relatively long

    intervals. The interval between harvesting operations is typically

    equal to the maturation period of the main species of trees felled,

    5

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    8/52

    the so-called rotation period. This may be as long as 60-80 years,

    equivalent to the lifespan of man. Because monocyclic logging re-

    moves not only mature but also semi-mature trees, a relatively

    large proportion of the forest may be affected. The volume of

    timber removed during monocyclic operations may be as high as

    120 m3/ha in certain South-east Asian forests (home to the prized

    dipterocarps), although more commonly the harvested volumes

    tend to converge around a value of about 60 m3/ha. The result of

    such intense logging is the creation of relatively large gaps in the

    canopy. This has the effect of stimulating light-loving species in

    the regrowth. As will be shown, the potential for damage to both

    soil and remaining trees through monocyclic logging is relatively

    high. This is indeed often the case in practice.

    Polycydic logging is the selective removal of only the largest

    individuals of desirable species. The objective is to wait for a

    sufficient number of trees to reach maturity, and then to remove

    these alone. Compared with monocyclic logging, fewer trees and

    a lower volume of timber is harvested, but the intervals between

    harvests are shorter. In some polycyclic systems, such as the

    CELOS system developed for Surinam, or the Tebang Pilih

    system advocated in Indonesia, this interval may be as short as

    20-25 years. Volumes of wood removed are typically 20-30 m3/ha

    per coupe. Whilst forest disturbance occurs more frequently than

    under monocyclic cutting regimes, the amount of damage caused

    to the overall forest is, theoretically, considerably less for each

    operation due to the smaller amounts of timber being extracted.

    Indeed, it is against the interests of loggers to damage immature

    trees because these constitute their next harvest. An important

    characteristic of polycylic logging is that the gaps formed are

    smaller than under a monocyclic regime, and this favours the re-

    generation of shade-loving species, which are often those with the

    greater commercial value. By mimicing the natural cycle of tree-

    death, gap formation and establishment of seedlings, carefully

    conducted polycyclic logging alters the forest less, and comes

    closest to a scientific way of sustaining the forest while utilising its

    products. However, in practice, this level of care is not always

    reached and the cumulative damage which may be inflicted to the

    forest has often been such that polycyclic logging systems have

    been thought to be unsustainable in the past. Nevertheless, most

    tropical rain forests are logged nowadays under some form of

    polycyclic system, for better or for worse.

    6

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    9/52

    3. IMPACT ON VEGETATION AND SOIL

    Logging operations of any type inevitably cause disturbance to

    the soil surface and to the vegetation which remains. Primary

    access roads are cut into the forest and connected by secondary

    tracks to regularly spaced log landings or timber decks cleared

    for the temporary storage of logs that have been extracted from

    the forest along so-called skid tracks. Whilst topographic con-

    ditions and the size of the trees in some forests permit logs to be

    extracted using elephants or even manpower, mechanized tract-

    ion using rubber-tyred or tracked vehicles are commonplace now-

    adays. Needless to say, such heavy machinery demolishes all

    that stands in its path, adding to the damage already done by the

    falling trees themselves. As already indicated, monocyclic logging

    inevitably causes more disturbance to the forest canopy and the

    soil surface than polycyclic systems, because more trees are ex-

    tracted during each operation. This is only partially balanced by

    the longer periods allowed for the forest to recover under mono-

    cyclic regimes.

    Typically, for every tree which is logged, a second is destroyed

    and a third is damaged beyond recovery. Under unimproved,

    standard management practices, polycyclic logging may cause

    damage to 15-35 of the remaining trees, whereas under mono-

    cyclic logging this figure may increase to 40-60 . As lowland

    forests are becoming more and more depleted, loggers are turn-

    ing their attention to forests growing in (much) steeper terrain

    where the use of tracked vehicles is often less practical. Under

    such conditions the use of a high-lead yarding system, where

    one end of the log is attached to a high cable and the other end

    is dragged along the ground or swings about (Figure l), has been

    shown to be particularly damaging to the vegetation along and

    surrounding the cable lines. This system has indeed been banned

    in some countries recently. By contrast, the use of a skyline

    corridor system (Figure 2) or helicopters, where the logs are

    hauled to the landings without making contact with the ground,

    produces relatively little damage to the remaining stand, most of

    which is caused by the felling of the trees rather than by the

    extraction process. Even under the most carefully executed, IOW-

    intensity logging there is a threshold of damage which is unavoi-

    dable.

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    10/52

    Figure 1.

    High-lead yarding.

    Figure 2. Skyline logging.

    The forest floor

    The forest floor is especially vulnerable to damage. Most of the

    roots are concentrated in the top 30 centimetres of the soil. In

    forests growing on the most infertile substrates, the roots form a

    distinct superficial root mat. Damage to the soil by machinery

    causes disturbance to the root mat, and this in turn impedes

    nutrient uptake by the trees and, therefore, their growth. Similarly,

    the forest floor constitutes the seed bank from which new trees

    are recruited and it takes little imagination to picture the con-

    sequences of soil disturbance for seedling survival. F inally, in the

    undisturbed situation the litter on the soil surface plays a vital role

    in preventing splash erosion from the rain drops falling from the

    canopy. Contrary to the popular belief, the canopies of tropical

    rain forests do not break the power of the incoming rain but rather

    tend to increase it. This is due to the fact that rain drops inter-

    cepted by the trees coalesce to form a film of water on the leaves

    from which drops then fall that are up to twice as large as the

    original rain drops. Because ground vegetation in undisturbed

    tropical forests is often rather sparse due to the low levels of light

    at the forest floor it is the task of the litter layer to absorb the

    enhanced erosive power of the rain drops falling from the canopy.

    Needless to say, its removal exposes the bare soil to the impact

    of the rain, with enhanced overland flow, surface erosion and the

    loss of precious topsoil nutrients as the result. This, in turn, has

    obvious consequences for the emergence of seedlings and the

    regeneration of the forest.

    8

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    11/52

    In summary, the forest floor is extremely important in maintaining

    proper ecosystem functioning and should therefore be disturbed

    as little as possible during timber harvesting operations.

    Damage and disturbance

    Depending on the extraction system that is used, logging leads to

    varying degrees of soil and litter disturbance. In the case of

    skyline or helicopter logging, the disturbance will be minimal and

    only a few per cent of the area will suffer exposure of the soil.

    Similarly, if the logs are hauled to the landings on sleds which are

    pushed or dragged by a group of men along a railway of jungle

    poles laid out according to a falling gradient, disturbance to the

    soil is negligible as well. However, where heavy machinery -

    rubber tyred or tracked vehicles - is employed, up to 30 of the

    surface may be laid bare in the form of roads, log landings and

    skidder tracks. The high-lead yarding technique illustrated in

    Figure 1. is sometimes claimed to be less damaging to the soil

    than yarding by tractor, but experimental evidence suggests the

    reverse. The repeated passage of heavy vehicles and logs over

    the extraction tracks generally has dramatic consequences for the

    porosity and water intake capacity of the soil, which are both

    significantly reduced. The effects have been demonstrated to be

    worse for wheeled vehicles, particularly when used on wet, clayey

    soils. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that severely

    compacted roads and tracks on clayey substrates have seldomly

    recovered to their original water intake capacity, even after more

    than a decade. A high degree of compaction not only hampers

    seedling establishment and root penetration but also causes leaf

    litter from the surrounding vegetation to be washed off the surface

    during rain, thus preventing the build-up of a new organic layer.

    Similar problems are often encountered when subsoils become

    exposed by bulldozing during road building. Due to its low organic

    matter content and poor aggregate stability subsoil material in

    many areas is particularly vulnerable to the impact of rainfall and

    needs rigorous protection if erosion is to be avoided.

    The picture then is rather gloomy: it must be concluded that most

    current selective logging practices generally cause considerable

    damage to both vegetation and the soil surface - and the damage

    inflicted is much more than could be expected by natural tree-falls

    during heavy rain storms or due to landslides. The better news is

    that this damage can be reduced significantly when improved

    practices are adopted. Various suggestions for improved manage-

    ment practices as well as the economics of the respective extract-

    ion methods will be discussed in the final sections.

    9

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    12/52

    Typically,

    f

    or

    tree which is

    every

    hwd,

    a second is destroyed

    and a third is

    damaged beyond

    recovery

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    13/52

    Where heavy

    machinery is

    employed,

    up to 30 of the

    surface may be laid

    bare in the form of

    roads, log landings

    and skidder tracks

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    14/52

    4. IMPACT ON STREAMFLOW

    Of all the environmental effects associated with logging, it is

    probably the hydrological changes which are the most misunder-

    stood. Deforestation and logging are held up to be the culprits

    when there are floods or landslides after extreme rain, and fingers

    are pointed whenever droughts occur and streams dry up. What

    started off as genuine concerns have become exaggerated, and

    are now repeated so often that myth has become accepted wis-

    dom. As we have seen in the previous section, injudicious logging

    causes widespread damage to the soil and remaining vegetation.

    So too is the hydrological cycle negatively affected. However, this

    does not always need to be the case, and a balanced, objective

    analysis is required based on the facts available.

    The Hydrological Cycle

    The natural hydrological cycle in moist tropical forest is illustrated

    in Figure 3. By definition, moist tropical forests are found where

    annual rainfall is high - at least 1.5 metres per year - and season-

    ality is limited to a dry season of about three months maximum.

    Rain falling on the forest ecosystem reaches the ground via three

    routes. Between 5 and 25 of the rain reaches the forest floor

    as direct throughfall, falling through openings in the canopy

    without touching leaves or stems. A further small proportion

    (usually i-2 ) flows down the tree trunks as stemflow. The

    remainder of the rain strikes the vegetation. The major ity of this

    then reaches the ground as drip from the canopy, but a significant

    proportion (typically lo-25 ) of the rain falling onto the forest

    never reaches the ground: it is intercepted by the canopy and is

    evaporated back into the atmosphere. The total amount of water

    reaching the forest floor in throughfall, drip and stemflow is

    usually referred to as net precipitation.

    Undisturbed forest soils are usually rich in organic matter and

    show abundant fauna1 activity which helps to maintain soil struct-

    ure, porosity and infiltration rates. Therefore, upon reaching the

    forest floor, the great majority of the rain infiltrates the soil via

    the leaf litter - which provides excellent protection against over-

    land flow and erosion. Indeed, infiltration excess overland flow is

    a relatively rare phenomenon in most tropical forests.

    Of all the

    environmental

    effects associated

    with logging,

    it is probably

    the hydrological

    changes which are

    the most

    misunderstood

    12

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    15/52

    I Crown drip/

    Figure 3.

    The hydrological cycle for a forested ecosystem.

    13

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    16/52

    However, surface runoff may also be caused by rain falling onto

    an already saturated soil in certain situations. This typically occurs

    in hillside hollows or concave footslopes near the stream where

    subsurface flow tends to converge and so maintains near-satur-

    ated conditions. Additionally, such saturation overland flow (SOF)

    can be observed during and after intense rainfall where an impe-

    ding layer or solid bedrock is found close to the surface. As will

    be shown later, it is of the utmost importance to stay clear of

    such SOF hot spots during logging operations if adverse hydro-

    logical effects are to be kept to a minimum.

    Further losses of water from the soil in moist tropical forest are

    either upwards through uptake by the trees for subsequent trans-

    piration from the canopy, or downwards through drainage into the

    stream network. The amount of water that is consumed by closed

    canopy tropical forest is high, typically about 1000 millimetres per

    year as long as no severe soil water deficits are experienced. In

    this way, a large proportion of the soil moisture is pumped back

    into the atmosphere by the trees. The remaining soil moisture

    drains into the stream network by throughflow, the result of

    downward moving water meeting an impermeable layer of subsoil

    or bedrock and then being deflected laterally. Such water drains

    slowly and steadily into the drainage network from the reservoir of

    moisture in the soil. This process accounts for the baseflow of

    streams. In seasonal climates, baseflow reaches a minimum in

    the dry season and this is referred to as dry season flow.

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    17/52

    After rainfall, streamflow increases. This increase comes both

    from the rapid throughflow of water already present in the soil

    before the start of the rain, and from contributions by saturation

    overland flow in a narrow zone around the stream channel (in

    most situations) or by infiltration excess overland flow during

    periods of extreme rainfall. The increase in streamflow above the

    baseflow is often called stormflow or quickflow. The highest rate

    of stormflow is commonly referred to as peakflow, and this rate

    may be reached during a rainfall event or as late as a number of

    days afterwards, depending on catchment characteristics and

    wetness, as well as on the duration, intensity and quantity of the

    rainfall event itself (Figure 4).

    01

    I I I I

    I

    I

    0 20 40

    60 60 too 120

    Hours since start of rain

    Flgure 4.

    Catchment response to rainfall as a function of topography:

    high peaks in runoff, that follow the rainfall pattern, are produced 6y

    (saturated) overland flow in streamhead hollows and other concavities ,

    whereas straight slopes with relatively deep soils tend to discharge their

    water via delayed subsurface throughflow.

    The total volume of water produced as streamflow from a given

    catchment area or watershed over a given period of time is

    called water yield. As we have seen, streamflow can be broadly

    divided into two components: baseflow and stormflow. Logging

    affects both and the following sections explain the reasons for

    these changes.

    15

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    18/52

    When a gap is

    formed, evaporation

    is reduced, at least

    temporarily I

    There is strong

    evidence that

    effects of selective

    timber harvesting

    operations on peak

    discharges can be

    kept small by a

    reasonable amount

    of care

    16

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    19/52

    Impact of logging on water yield

    As indicated earlier, logging creates a mosaic of gaps in the

    forest canopy. Whilst the size and number of the gaps depend on

    the intensity of the logging, they invariably occupy a greater total

    area than gaps which are formed by natural tree mortality and

    landsliding. When a gap is formed, evapotranspiration is reduced,

    at least temporarily. The large trees which used to pump the bulk

    of soil moisture back into the atmosphere have been removed. In

    addition, more rainfall reaches the soil in a newly created gap

    because less rain is intercepted by the still immature canopy.

    Both factors tend to increase the levels of soil moisture in these

    gaps, despite higher soil temperatures and an increased atmo-

    spheric evaporative demand in the clearings. The larger a gap,

    the more this effect becomes apparent, and the longer it lasts

    (Figure 5).

    250

    I.

    1. 1.1.

    270 290

    310

    Day of the experiment

    Soil water depletion patterns as observed

    during the

    dry

    season in undisturbed forest, in six-year-old regrowth, and in freshly maae

    large (50 x 50 m) and small (10 x 50 m) gaps in Costa Rica.

    17

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    20/52

    As long as soil disturbance during logging is limited - affecting,

    say, less than 10 of the area - the extra net rainfall and reduced

    evapotranspiration will be translated automatically into increased

    water yield, particularly through increased baseflow. However,

    where logging operations are crude and soil disturbance high, the

    gain in soil moisture due to decreased evapotranspiration will still

    tend to increase overall water yield, but a larger proportion of it

    will be in the form of rapid throughflow and overland flow, thus

    increasing the stormflow component of streamflow. In more ex-

    treme situations, baseflow during prolonged dry spells may even

    be reduced after logging. This may occur when soil compaction

    by machinery has become so widespread that during wet periods

    the water storage capacity of the soil is no longer replenished by

    infiltrating rainfall. The resulting lack of water stored in the soil

    subsequently shows up as reduced baseflow, despite the reduced

    uptake of water by the remaining forest.

    Experimental evidence

    Quantitative evidence for these effects is far from comprehensive,

    however, and some of it must be treated with caution. Forests

    and catchments are diverse and rainfall patterns are often erratic.

    Even where streamflow emanating from forests is carefully monit-

    ored before and after logging, the variation in rainfall between

    years complicates analysis. Arguably the best experimental

    approach is to use the paired catchment methodology, where

    similar, forested catchments in the same area are simultaneously

    monitored. The two are intercalibrated over a number of years to

    account for climatic variations before one is logged while the

    other is left undisturbed. Results are now available from a few

    such studies for moist tropical forests, and although some showed

    little or no effect on water yield after light (polycyclic) logging, one

    of the most comprehensive studies, a monocyclic logging oper-

    ation using crawler tractors and winch lorries at Bukit Berembun

    in Peninsular Malaysia, confirmed that water yield was indeed

    increased by the logging, with the majority of the increase coming

    through increased baseflow. This was found to be true for both

    supervised and unsupervised logging practices. Where the ex-

    traction of about 33 of the commercial stocking was carried out

    according to environmentally-friendly guidelines (the supervised

    treatment, which involved closely specified prescriptions for lay-

    out, gradients and drainage of tractor tracks), overall water yield

    was increased by 40 compared with pre-logging conditions.

    Total water yield was increased by about 70 upon harvesting

    40 of the stocking in the adjacent catchment by means of

    generally practised methods (the unsupervised treatment).

    18

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    21/52

    There is no solid published information on the time span which is

    required for post-logging levels of water yield to diminish to their

    original value. It is to be expected that different logging intensities

    will result in different recovery periods. At Berembun, there was

    no significant decline in the net gain of (base)flow with time over

    a period of four years after logging, suggesting that water use by

    the regrowth in the gaps created by logging remained below that

    of the original stock for at least this period of time. However,

    there are indications from Borneo that the water use of regener-

    ating logged-over forests may well stabilise after 5-10 years.

    Whilst the relative increase in water yield recorded after unsuper-

    vised timber extraction at Bukit Berembun (70 ) may seem high

    at first sight, the absolute increase in flow (ca. 160 millimetres per

    year) becomes far more modest (about 10 ) when expressed as

    a percentage of the evapotranspiration of the undisturbed forest

    (ca. 1450 mm). Forest exploitation is often accused of causing

    substantial reductions in rainfall, but it is difficult to see how such

    a relatively small drop in the amount of moisture which is evapo-

    rated back into the atmosphere could achieve such an effect,

    particularly in view of the fact that the reduction in evapotranspira-

    tion tails off within a decade after logging. Climatic changes in the

    tropics in relation to land-use dynamics are only poorly under-

    stood at present, but it is almost certain that such changes are

    hardly effected by logging operations.

    It is often

    conveniently

    forgotten that floods

    are a natural

    hazard in areas with

    heavy rainfall

    19

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    22/52

    Impact on catchment response to rainfall

    Popular wisdom holds that logging causes floods, and that floods

    are damaging. At the same time, it is often conveniently forgotten

    that floods are a natural hazard in areas with heavy rainfall. A

    flood is defined by the maximum rate of streamflow over a given

    duration. The magnitude of the peak discharge determines the

    maximum height of the water in the stream channel, and has

    therefore direct implications for downstream land users. It is

    important to know, therefore, what the evidence is for increased

    peak flows (and stormflow volumes) as a result of selective log-

    ging.

    Quicker response

    We have shown that one impact of logging is, generally, to in-

    crease overall water yield from catchments, with higher gains in

    yield corresponding with larger volumes of timber removed. As

    long as most of the rain is able to infiltrate, the soil becomes

    wetter compared with pre-logging conditions. When additional rain

    falls, this has the effect of pushing the stored moisture more

    rapidly into the drainage network. Therefore, the concentration

    time for the catchment is reduced: that is, more water reaches

    the stream network more quickly during and immediately after a

    storm, rather than filling the soils storage capacity and then being

    released slowly over a later period as baseflow. In addition,

    contributions by saturation overland flow also tend to increase

    with increasing catchment wetness. It has been demonstrated

    that, in the case of complete forest removal, mean peak dis-

    charges are on average enhanced by about 50 due to the effect

    of increased wetness of the soil alone: that is, without additional

    contributions by overland flow due to soil disturbance. Because

    reductions in vegetation cover usually associated with logging are

    much smaller, the effects on peak discharges related to changes

    in soil moisture status will be typically (much) less than 10 .

    However, as indicated earlier with respect to damage to the

    vegetation and soil, the extra rainfall reaching the ground in the

    newly created gaps does not necessarily infiltrate as efficiently as

    before. This is clearly the case for roads, landings and skid

    tracks, where the protective litter layer has been removed and the

    surface has become compacted. Runoff rates from such surfaces

    can be very high (up to 70 of incident rainfall), particularly in the

    case of thoroughly compacted clay soils. Therefore, in recently

    logged-over forests,

    infiltration excess overland flow usually

    becomes more common. It may become particularly widespread

    in areas where logging operations are implemented without

    20

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    23/52

    The repeated

    passage of heavy

    vehicles and logs

    over the skid tracks

    has dramatic

    consequences for the

    water intake capacity

    of the soil I

    21

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    24/52

    regard for the environment: where road and track lay-out has

    been poorly planned and constructed, and where heavy equip-

    ment has been allowed to roam the forest (timber cruising),

    meanwhile compacting the earth and creating larger gaps than

    necessary by wanton destruction of vegetation.

    Clearly these effects are linked to the method of logging used - as

    well as to the physical characteristics of the catchment itself.

    Again, in the case of skyline, helicopter, or animal-based extract-

    ion procedures, soil disturbance and thus overland flow and sheet

    erosion are minimal, particularly when only small volumes of tim-

    ber are harvested. The opposite is true for operations removing

    large volumes of wood, using wheeled skidders, crawler tractors,

    or a high-lead yarding system in the case of steep terrain. As we

    have seen, typically IO-30 of the soil may become more or less

    seriously disturbed during such intensive monocyclic operations.

    Similarly, flat terrain underlain by highly permeable sandy soils

    tends to be far less vulnerable in this respect than steeper areas

    with clayey soils of low permeability.

    Peak flows: what changes?

    The experimental evidence with respect to the effect of logging on

    the magnitude of peak flows is, again, rather limited. Whilst peak

    discharges in all experiments reported to date have shown to be

    increased as a result of logging, the increases were rarely stat-

    istically significant. It could be argued that these experiments may

    have produced biased results because the loggers, being aware

    of the hydrological monitoring programme and its objectives, may

    have tended to behave more carefully than they might have done

    otherwise. There are also numerous anecdotal accounts of greatly

    altered streamflow regimes following commercial forest exploit-

    ation. True as these may be, the experimental results at least

    provide strong evidence that effects of timber harvesting oper-

    ations on peak discharges, and thus downstream flooding, can be

    kept small by the application of a reasonable amount of care

    during the exercise. As will be discussed in more detail in Chapter

    7, the lay-out of the extraction network is of particular importance

    in this respect.

    22

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    25/52

    5. IMPACT ON EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION

    In response to the increased demands for water by a rapidly

    growing population, and the often deteriorated flow regimes of

    rivers, engineers in the humid and seasonal tropics are relying

    more and more on the establishment of large structural works

    such as river dams. Ideally, the lakes created behind these dams

    act as storage reservoirs to diminish floods during the rainy

    season and to provide water for irrigation and other purposes

    during rainless periods. In addition, they may be used for the

    generation of hydro-power, as well as for recreation.

    However, there are countless examples of reservoirs silting up in

    the humid tropics well before their design life has been reached.

    The reservoirs unintentionally act as sediment traps, capturing

    river bedload of rocks and stones, and also filtering out the sand

    and silt particles carried in suspension by the rivers feeding the

    lake. These products of erosion accumulate at the points of entry

    into the reservoir, gradually fanning out as the process continues,

    and so reduce the lakes storage capacity. To what extent are the

    volumes of sand and stones carried by tropical rivers a natural

    phenomenon, and what is the role of mans activities in this

    respect? Should upstream logging receive the blame for accel-

    erated reservoir siltation and raised river beds as is so often

    claimed, or is an increasing amount of forest clearance for agri-

    culture in the upland areas the culprit?

    There is no doubt that both erosion and sediment yields increase

    after selective logging. This is not surprising, as undisturbed

    natural forest has one of the lowest surface erosion rates of any

    form of land use in the humid tropics. As we have seen, this is

    due especially to the nature of the forest floor - the leaf litter and

    root mat - which resist erosion. However, before discussing the

    factors which influence the level of erosion and sediment yields

    after forest exploitation, we will briefly look at the processes

    involved.

    Processes of erosion

    There are several different forms of soil erosion. Splash erosion is

    the process by which soil particles are detached and moved by

    the impact of raindrops splashing onto the soil surface.

    23

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    26/52

    The eroded particles -

    which may only have been moved a few

    centimetres - are then vulnerable to further transport downslope

    by overland flow. The tell-tale signs of such sheet erosion are a

    series of steps a centimetre or so high running across the slope,

    or the accumulation of litter and soil behind small obstructions

    such as tree roots, rocks, etc. As indicated earlier, both splash

    and sheet erosion are of little importance in undisturbed forest

    conditions, but they may well produce substantial amounts of

    sediment after the soil is bared, particularly after compaction.

    Once this stage is reached, topographic irregularities often lead to

    the concentration of overland flow in micro-channels termed rills.

    If the process continues long enough, these rills may deepen and

    widen into gullies.

    Both rills and gullies are often observed on poorly sited skidder

    and tractor tracks and along badly drained feeder roads, part-

    icularly where erodible subsoil material has become exposed by

    bulldozing. Intensive rilling and gullying is a sure sign that large

    volumes of soil material have been removed from the site un-

    necessarily, hampering forest regeneration and future productivity.

    Heavy erosion is

    commonly observed

    on poorly drained

    roads - especially

    where erodible

    subsoil is exposed

    24

    - .-. ---

    -

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    27/52

    Mass wasting is another mechanism of sediment supply to

    streams, especially common in steep areas where rainfall is high.

    Landslips and riverbank erosion fall into this category, and are

    often a natural hazard, although the intensity of, particularly,

    shallow landslips (say, less than a metre deep) has been shown

    to increase after tree removal due to the loss of the stability

    imparted by the tree roots. Similarly, riverbank erosion may

    increase after logging, as a result of scouring by the increased

    peak flows which we have seen to be associated with poorly

    executed logging operations.

    However, it is important to recognise that not all eroded material

    is delivered directly into the stream network. Particles are often

    stored temporarily (or permanently) lower down the slope. This is

    especially true for splash and sheet erosion, and explains why it

    is impossible to predict catchment sediment losses from observ-

    ations of erosion made on small runoff plots alone. On the other

    hand, gully erosion, large landslides and river bank erosion tend

    to deliver sediment quickly and directly into the stream. But even

    here there is storage: just because sediment reaches the stream

    network, that does not mean it will appear in downstream reserv-

    oirs overnight. It may take an exceptional peak flow to flush the

    stream bed and wash the sediment into its final resting place.

    Building roads in

    midslope locations

    displaces

    unnecessarily large

    amounts of material -

    and is highly

    damaging to slope

    stability

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    28/52

    Difficulties in quantification

    The extent of the increase in erosion and sediment yield after

    logging in moist tropical forests is poorly quantified, and more

    work on this topic is urgently required. However, putting numbers

    on these processes is difficult for several reasons. High on the list

    of complicating factors are the differences between individual

    catchments. Amounts of sediment carried by rivers draining fully

    forested tropical catchments may easily vary by a factor of 20-30,

    depending on topography and soil erodibility. Furthermore the

    erosion and sediment delivery rates for a given catchment may

    differ enormously from year to year due to variability of rainfall:

    this effect has to be isolated from the impact caused by logging.

    No single study has, so far, achieved an accurate picture of the

    true extent of erosion and sediment delivery for logged forests.

    Nevertheless, the evidence available to date suggests that sedi-

    ment yields in areas with initially low sediment production may

    increase by between two and ten times as a result of road con-

    struction alone - depending on the siting and extent of the road

    network - and this may then increase to twenty times the original

    amount from undisturbed forest as a result of log extraction by

    means of tractors or skidders. Roads and compacted tracks often

    form a lasting source of runoff and sediment to the streams and

    where the extraction network has been poorly sited or construct-

    ed, a return to pre-logging sediment concentrations is never likely

    to occur. Where stream sediment loads used to be low, increased

    sediment concentrations after timber or mineral exploitation may

    ultimately affect the composition of the fish population in the

    streams and therefore directly affect the diet of forest dwellers.

    Recovery after logging

    Some general reduction of stream sediment loads does of course

    take place as the forest regenerates, but the rate of this recovery

    is the least documented of all. Although there is some evidence

    that erosion on former skid tracks may be halved after a few

    years where recolonisation is successful, rilling and gullying of

    steep, compacted tracks may last much longer. Even where re-

    growth occurs rapidly, sediment temporarily stored in the catch-

    ment (in hillside depressions or at the foot of the slopes) will

    continue to find its way to the streams, and this tends to keep the

    sediment yield values high for a number of years after logging.

    There is some evidence to suggest that annual sediment yields

    are reduced to about twice the original rates after two to five

    years, depending on the amount and intensity of rainfall.

    26

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    29/52

    f

    orn

    Vegetation

    recovering on

    2er skid tracks

    Needless to say, all this points to the paramount importance of

    minimising ground disturbance during harvesting operations.

    Catchment sediment yields in the warm temperate zone have

    been shown to remain virtually unaffected by skyline logging,

    whereas manual extraction of timber in lowland rain forest in

    Borneo did not increase stream sediment loads either. Even

    where tractors are used, however, the application of a series of

    simple precautions (discussed in more detail in Chapter 7) may

    already lead to two- to fourfold reductions in catchment sediment

    yields compared with those produced by unsupervised logging

    operations.

    27

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    30/52

    6. IMPACT ON THE FOREST NUTRIENT BUDGET

    It is widely assumed that the majority of the plant nutrients within

    a moist tropical forest are held in the vegetation, and that such

    forests generally grow on poor or very poor soils. One popular

    opinion is, therefore, that repeated removal of trees from the

    forest, without any return of nutrients by man, will rapidly lead to

    the creation of a nutrient desert. Again, fact needs to be separ-

    ated from fiction. Before discussing the effects of selective logging

    on soil fertility and the forest nutrient budget, let us consider the

    various gains and losses of nutrients to and from the undisturbed

    ecosystem (Figure 6).

    The forest nutrient cycle

    Nutrients enter the forest both from above, and from below. Rain

    falling on the forest contains plant foods, while both dust and

    aerosols deposit nutrients on the forest canopy during rainless

    periods as well. Below the ground (and to some extent above)

    atmospheric nitrogen is fixed from the air by micro-organisms.

    Weathering of rock beneath the soil may provide further nutrients

    to the biotic portion of the system where the fresh bedrock is

    situated close enough to the surface to be within reach of the tree

    rootlets. There is a steady flow of nutrients from the canopy (the

    above-ground plant community) to the forest floor by litterfall, but

    also by throughfall of rain and stemflow which wash nutrients

    down from the trees. The forest floor is carpeted with litter - dead

    and decaying leaves, branches and other debris, including entire

    trees which have been downed as a result of heavy rain, wind

    gusts or landslides. This organic matter decomposes to release

    plant nutrients which may be taken up by the plants for growth,

    thus completing the cycle. Losses of nutrients in an undisturbed

    forest occur primarily through leaching from the soil in drainage

    water, and to a lesser extent via surface erosion. In seasonal

    climates, forest fires may play a role as well. Some nitrogen is

    lost from the forest floor by denitrification processes, and a

    portion of the phosphorus in the system can effectively be lost to

    plants through fixation by organic and mineral compounds.

    28

    --

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    31/52

    EXCHANGE

    COMPLEXES

    --mm_

    ---__

    SOIL

    rock

    weathering

    -__---

    -----__

    -T

    -.

    nutrient losses in

    ,,--------------- --

    \

    . water movemantr from forrrt ,

    Ro& - -_______-_-_-_-- -

    Figure 6.

    The nutrient cycle in moist tropical forest.

    29

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    32/52

    Undisturbed tropical forests generally produce a spectacular

    amount of plant growth

    - in the region of 300-500 tonnes (dry

    weight) per hectare of above-ground standing biomass - even on

    exceedingly infertile substrates. How do these forests manage to

    sustain such wealth under such poor conditions? The answer

    apparently lies in their relatively closed nutrient cycle. Inputs and

    outputs of nutrients are usually very limited in the case of forests

    growing on the most infertile soils, and nutrients are therefore in a

    continuous state of circulation through the system. In other words,

    they are used again and again without being lost from the system.

    According to this view, the concentration of fine roots at and just

    below the forest floor plays a key role in the process of nutrient

    uptake. The concept of a relatively closed nutrient cycle remains

    important, even though recent soil surveys in hitherto poorly doc-

    umented rain forest areas have shown that the areal extent of

    really poor soils is only half of that commonly assumed, and that

    fine tree rootlets in these soils can be found many metres below

    the surface.

    Inputs and outputs

    of nutrients are

    often very limited

    and nutrients

    are in a continuous

    state of circulation

    through the system

    Nutrient losses

    It is clear that any interference with forests growing on nutrient-

    poor soils could potentially have a serious effect on the nutrient

    budget, by disturbing the natural cycle. As will be shown below,

    this impact can indeed be serious where logging is carried out at

    a high intensity, and in an uncontrolled manner. Where this is the

    case, future productivity will be impaired as a result. Four aspects

    need to be considered in this respect. These are: loss of nutrients

    in harvested timber, erosion and redistribution of topsoil, increas-

    ed leaching, and forest fires.

    Logging removes a proportion of the above-ground nutrients held

    in the timber. The critical factor here is how much is removed,

    and how often. Where intervals are long, and timber extraction

    light, as in certain polycyclic regimes of selective logging, the

    associated losses of nutrients will be very small - typically about

    24 of the total amount stored in the above-ground living bio-

    mass. On the other hand, there are grounds to justify fears that

    heavy logging (extracting, say, more than 100 m3 of timber per

    hectare as is not uncommon in the rich forests of South-east

    Asia) may lead to losses of as much as 15 of the total stock of

    nutrients in the biomass.

    The second kind of nutrient loss concerns the nutrients contained

    in the extra soil eroded from the disturbed parts of the forest. We

    have already seen how uncontrolled logging can lead to high soil

    loss, particularly from poorly sited and compacted skid tracks. A

    closely related phenomenon is the redistribution of topsoil material

    30

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    33/52

    Amounts of

    nutrients removed in

    harvested. timber

    may be substantial

    when earth is moved aside to construct roads, landings and

    tracks. Although this may not lead to a net loss of nutrients from

    the area as a whole, it has obvious implications for the recolo-

    nisation of the skid tracks. Little is known about the accompa-

    nying floristic dynamics.

    Thirdly, leaching losses tend to occur more readily after logging.

    Where the rootmat and surface litter are extensively disturbed,

    there is no longer the same filtering effect which helps to capture

    nutrients washed down from the canopy. Leaching is also accel-

    erated because more net rainfall reaches the soil through the

    gaps in the forest, while less water is pumped back by evapo-

    transpiration. Moreover, the sudden addition of large amounts of

    organic matter in the form of logging debris left to rot on the

    forest floor and the (at least temporarily) reduced capacity of the

    new vegetation in the gaps to utilise the available nutrients, both

    add to the problem. The sum result is increased drainage into the

    stream network, and more leaching losses of soluble nutrients.

    31

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    34/52

    Once an area is

    opened up by

    logging roads there

    is often an influx of

    land-hungry people

    32

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    35/52

    Evidence points to a threshold gap size in the canopy (probably

    located somewhere between 200-500 m*) above which leaching

    increases significantly. Sandy soils are more vulnerable in this

    respect than more clayey soils, reflecting their different water and

    nutrient retention characteristics.

    The final potential cause of nutrient loss after logging is fire.

    Selective logging does not include burning as a deliberate oper-

    ation, but it sometimes occurs as an unwelcomed side-effect. The

    availability of discarded logs provides an opportunity for local

    charcoal makers to start small-scale operations within the forest

    concession. Smouldering charcoal heaps can blaze out of control,

    and cause at least localised forest fires. More important perhaps

    is the influx of land-hungry people who start practising slash-and-

    burn types of agriculture once the area has become opened up

    by the logging roads. Finally, the logging debris left on site con-

    stitutes a potential hazard in that it provides large volumes of fuel

    if a forest fire occurs. Whatever the cause of these fires, post-fire

    leaching and erosion greatly add to the direct losses of nutrients.

    33

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    36/52

    Sustainability and safety limits

    Taking these various losses into account, what then are the chan-

    ces for sustained site fertility in relation to selective logging? Will

    natural contributions of nutrients from atmospheric and geological

    sources be sufficient to compensate for these losses? Unfortuna-

    tely, information which would allow the accurate computation of

    safety limits for timber offtake and harvest intervals for different

    situations is still far from complete.

    The general picture is that damage can, and does occur to the

    nutrient cycle; but this is mainly associated with heavy logging,

    and poorly planned operations in areas with infertile soils. The

    evidence available suggests that overall nutrients reserves will

    hardly be depleted where modest amounts of timber (say, 20 m3

    per hectare) are harvested at intervals of about 20 years, even on

    poor soils with little or no nutrient input by rock weathering. The

    relatively small losses in timber and extra leaching are roughly

    compensated by atmospheric additions. Similarly, there are in-

    dications that volumes of 60 m3 of timber may be harvested per

    hectare of forest about every 60 years as part of a monocyclic

    system, without serious depletion of soil nutrient reserves. How-

    ever, it is almost certain that natural inputs of nutrients to the

    richly stocked dipterocarp forests of South-east Asia are not suf-

    ficient to sustain the harvesting intensities of 100 m3 per hectare

    and above that occur in some parts of the region. There is a need

    for further research in this respect.

    It is almost certain

    that natural inputs

    of nutrients to the

    richly stocked

    forests of

    South-east Asia are

    not sufficient

    to sustain harvesting

    intensities of

    100 m3 per hectare

    and above

    34

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    37/52

    7. HOW CAN LOGGING BE IMPROVED?

    All that is needed,

    is to put into

    practice what is

    already known - but

    so far rarely

    implemented

    There is a growing body of evidence that at least half of the

    damage caused by selective logging to vegetation and the soil

    can be avoided by careful execution of well-planned harvesting

    operations. All that is needed, is to put into practice what is

    a/ready known -

    but so far rare/y implemented. As we will see in

    the next chapter, the extra cost of environmental-friendly logging

    is modest, yet the benefits are considerable. What follows now is

    a checklist of the requirements for improved logging, both the

    organisational framework and the technical measures.

    Pre-logging planning: contracts and conditions

    The basic prerequisite for improved logging is planning before

    operations begin. Pre-logging planning must be carried out collab-

    oratively between the relevant Government department and the

    logging company. The end-product is a contract agreed by the

    two parties. The contract not only specifies the agreed timber

    harvest quota, but also the conditions which must be adhered to.

    The actual planning involves an assessment of the catchment to

    be logged, and the preparation of an inventory of its particular

    requirements for environmental safeguards. Catchment charact-

    eristics as well as forests differ widely, and each situation should

    be examined in sufficient detail to allow the identification of part-

    icularly sensitive areas. Generally, these will include riparian

    zones and other wet spots that are not only likely to produce

    saturation overland flow during rain, but are also particularly

    vulnerable to soil compaction, Other sensitive categories are

    steep slopes that are prone to landsliding, very shallow soils, etc.

    Apart from the delineation of sensitive areas, the logging contract

    may also need to include the prohibition of log extraction during

    very wet periods to minimise the risk of soil compaction (Figure

    7). The next step is to combine the information on the positions of

    the trees to be harvested with the characteristics of the terrain to

    derive the most economical, yet least damaging extraction tech-

    nique. This process may be facilitated by the use of a Geographi-

    cal Information System. Most importantly, the various conditions

    specified in the agreement should be monitored and supervised

    by the responsible government agency. Finally, there should be

    provision for penalties where conditions are not met.

    35

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    38/52

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    IO

    6

    S

    L

    3

    2

    1

    i

    I

    I

    \

    I

    \

    u

    \

    \

    Track-type machine

    \

    \

    \

    \

    b..

    .

    -.

    s

    ---_ 0

    14 moisture

    21 moisture

    I -

    t

    Rubber-tyred machine

    I

    I I I I I I I I

    I 1 I I I I

    0 2 4 b 8 10 12 I4 16 16 20 22 24 26 28 30

    Number of vehicle passes

    Figure 7.

    The impact of rubber-tyred and tracked skidding machinery

    on the water intake capacity of the soil as a function of

    the number of vehicle passes. Note the contrast in impact

    between the two types of machines, and the effect of soil

    wetness.

    36

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    39/52

    Road infrastructure

    The considerable potential of the haulage roads and skid trails to

    contribute to environmental damage has been stressed in pre-

    vious chapters. Even if no other measures are introduced, the

    careful planning of this infrastructure can help enormously to

    minimise damage, both on-site (erosion) and off-site (stream

    sedimentation). Roads and major skid tracks should be located on

    ridge crests wherever possible. This will not only minimise surface

    erosion, but also the frequency and size of road-related land-

    slides. This has its price, however, because in steep terrain some

    of the most productive parts of the forest stand are often found on

    ridges. Where sloping terrain cannot be avoided, maximum road

    gradients need to be specified and adequate drainage facilities

    designed. As roads generally provide the most direct routes for

    runoff and sediment to water courses, the number of stream

    crossings should be minimised (Figure 8). Where crossings are

    necessary, they should be located and constructed in such a way

    as to minimise sediment contributions to the stream. Whilst proper

    planning and construction of the haulage road network is essent-

    ial, subsequent maintenance is equally important. This aspect is

    often overlooked or inadequately addressed. The recent finding

    that the application of reduced tyre pressure not only reduces

    vehicle operational and maintenance costs but also expenditure

    on road surfacing and maintenance, is good news therefore. Add-

    itional advantages of reduced tyre pressure include a decline in

    the rutting of road surfaces and therefore erosion, and an ex-

    tended haul season due to improved traction.

    Figure 8.

    Uphill log extraction

    tends to divert

    runoff and sediment

    away from streams,

    in contrast to

    downhill extraction.

    37

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    40/52

    Much of what has been said about roads also holds for skid

    tracks, and the proper planning of their location and drainage

    should be one of the key elements of any logging agreement. As

    illustrated in Figure 8, uphill extraction of timber is to be preferred

    to downhill extraction, because the former tends to divert the flow

    of runoff and sediment away from the streams. Needless to say,

    this will greatly reduce downstream flooding and sedimentation

    hazards. Similarly, log landings should be located in such a way

    as to minimise contributions of runoff and sediment to streams.

    Finally, they may need to be ripped after completion of the

    operation to promote their recolonisation.

    Mechanisation

    It is unrealistic to expect logging companies to revert to the

    original damage-limiting methods of manual or animal-based tim-

    ber extraction, but it is certainly possible to demand the minimum

    use of heavy equipment. Usually, the bigger the machine, the

    more damage is caused through destruction of vegetation and

    compaction of surfaces, particularly where soils are clayey or wet.

    Roads and mq

    skid tracks shou

    located on ridge

    crests wherever

    possible

    for

    Id be

    38

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    41/52

    If alternatives like skyline techniques (Figure 2) are considered

    uneconomical and the use of wheeled or tracked vehicles un-

    avoidable, then at least overall machine size should be restricted

    where possible. In addition, the use of winch rope systems should

    be encouraged to avoid heavy machinery having to gain access

    to every individual log. Logs may then be winched uphill (prefera-

    bly with the leading end lifted off the ground to prevent it from

    ploughing into the soil) by the machine on the ridge. This, of

    course has the added advantage that the area occupied by skid

    tracks will not be unnecessarily large. Other measures which help

    to reduce the areal extent or intensity of soil disturbance include:

    (i) the felling of trees in the direction of the nearest skid track

    (which reduces the hauling distance; a herringbone pattern often

    appears to be the most economical); (ii) the combined haulage of

    several logs at the same time (reducing the number of vehicle

    passes; however, this is only practical in moderately flat terrain

    and the advantage may be offset by the need to employ heavier

    equipment); and (iii) the use of tracked rather than rubber-tyred

    vehicles (Figure 7), particularly in steeper terrain. The benefits of

    reduced tyre pressure has been commented upon already.

    Buffer strips

    One of the simplest, but most effective, measures to reduce ad-

    verse impacts of logging on streamflow is to concentrate activities

    away from drainage channels that could quickly transport sedi-

    ment downstream during wet weather. This may even include

    some valleys that carry no water during extended dry spells. The

    resulting bands of natural vegetation along the streamside, which

    are left untouched, are usually referred to as streamside buffer

    strips, or simply as buffer strips. The stream banks are thus

    protected from disturbance, thereby reducing bank erosion. The

    buffer strips also help to filter out eroded material from overland

    flow, and therefore sediment losses are reduced. In addition, they

    help to moderate extremes in stream water temperatures, which

    is important for the conservation of the aquatic ecosystem. Last

    but not least, they may also act as miniature reserves of genetic

    material within the logged forest and as a refuge for tree-dwelling

    animals during logging operations. Desirable widths for the buffer

    strips will vary widely, depending on local terrain, soils, and

    stream conditions. Experience indicates that IO-40 m wide ripari-

    an strips are effective in protecting water quality in most streams.

    Buffer strips are not a panacea, however, and detailed harvest

    planning may reveal potential problems or trade-offs in their use.

    For example, runoff and sediment problems may still occur if

    roads and landings become poorly located through avoiding buffer

    areas, or if newly exposed streamside trees crash during storms.

    39

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    42/52

    Adequate drainage

    facilities need to be

    designed I

    Streamside buffer

    strips are one of the

    simplest and most

    effective

    measures It

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    43/52

    Queensland and Surinam: where improved logging evolved

    Improved logging practices were developed in northern Queens-

    land, Australia, over a quarter of a century ago as part of a

    polycyclic system, and were widely implemented there until

    logging was prohibited when the rain forest in the area was

    declared a World Heritage Site in 1988. Few forested areas in the

    tropics experience the quantity and intensity of rainfall of this

    region, and therefore any measures which work well in Queens-

    land are likely to prove effective elsewhere. Key elements in the

    Queensland system comprise pre-logging planning, buffer strips,

    controlled drainage and suspension of the operation during wet

    periods. Indeed, much of what has been said in the previous

    paragraphs is based on the Queensland experience.

    Enough is

    currently known to

    make interim

    recommendations...

    . .the next step is

    for Governments to

    act decisively

    More recently, a specific system of damage-controlled logging has

    been formulated for rain forests in Surinam. This CELOS system

    of harvesting is a sub-component of a broader forest manage-

    ment system, which aims to harvest timber economically within a

    polycyclic framework. The central objective is to minimise environ-

    mental damage while maintaining the forest in as natural a state

    as possible. The system is appropriate for similar forests in the

    Amazon basin. Typical extraction rates are 20-30m3 of timber per

    hectare at intervals of 20-25 years. Major elements of the CELOS

    harvesting method are pre-logging planning, followed by direction-

    al felling, the establishment of a complete skid trail network before

    logging, and winch extraction of logs (as opposed to timber

    cruising. Further information on the experience from Queensland

    and Surinam can be found found in several of the literature refer-

    ences listed.

    The next chapter demonstrates clearly that profitability and dama-

    ge limitation can go hand-in-hand. Long-term production pro-

    spects are best served by protecting the environment. While the

    methodologies are now available for environmentally sound log-

    ging, the level of implementation is disappointingly low. Even

    when put into practice, follow-up and supervision have often

    proved inadequate. The majority of forests are still harvested

    according to the methods which best suit the short-term profit

    motives of logging companies - while the environmental issues

    are sidelined. This means uncontrolled logging, and, usually,

    considerable damage to soil and vegetation. Although further

    research will sharpen our knowledge about the various processes,

    enough is currently known to make interim recommendations.

    Therefore, education and training for policy-makers, forestry staff

    and, particularly, loggers and operators of machinery are the most

    vital keys in the overall process. However this all needs to be set

    in the context of appropriate institutional and policy frameworks at

    national level. The next step is for Governments to act decisively.

    41

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    44/52

    42

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    45/52

    8. COSTS AND BENEFITS

    Protecting the environment is an attractive concept - but what

    price must be paid to achieve it? Provision of improved planning

    and infrastructural works incurs extra expenditure, and both buffer

    strips and prohibited zones represent loss of harvestable area. In

    addition, avoiding wet periods of the year means downtime for

    contractors. What are the increases in costs and what, precisely,

    are the benefits in the case of improved selective logging? After

    all, commercial logging companies generally react to hard profit-

    ability. To change their habits, they need to be convinced that

    improved practices are not a drain on their pockets...

    Improved efficiency - better profits

    Improved practices

    are not necessarily

    more expensive than

    conventional logging

    operations

    Because of the economic shyness that is so prevalent in scien-

    tific and environmental circles, and the general tendency of

    traditional economists to ignore the costs associated with potenti-

    ally adverse off-site consequences of logging (such as increased

    flooding and stream sedimentation), it is difficult to attach a com-

    plete economic picture to improved practices. However, there is

    a steadily growing body of evidence showing that the combination

    of improved logging efficiency and reduced environmental dama-

    ge can indeed be economically profitable. For example, it was

    established that, within the framework of the Queensland poly-

    cyclic system, application of controlled logging practices raised

    the average cost of logs delivered to the mill by as little as 3 .

    Whilst the demonstrated off-site benefits like reduced stream sedi-

    mentation in Queensland were not quantified in economic terms,

    there is little doubt that the savings in downstream water treat-

    ment costs did more than offset any increases in logging costs.

    However, and perhaps somewhat as a surprise to some, improv-

    ed logging practices are not necessarily more expensive than

    conventional operations. For example, application of the CELOS

    harvesting system in Surinam reduced the overall costs of timber

    extraction by 16-31 compared to conventional logging tech-

    niques, due to savings brought about by increased efficiency. To

    this should be added the substantial reductions in damage inflict-

    ed to the remaining stand (up to 40 ) that may be obtained by

    well-planned and well-conducted operations. Similarly positive

    results have been obtained by various studies in East Malaysia.

    43

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    46/52

    Needless to say, this will enhance future forest productivity, and

    thus profitability.

    Savings achievable

    The timber extraction network occupies a key position in many

    respects. As we have seen in the previous chapters, a substantial

    proportion of downstream flooding and sedimentation problems

    are related to poorly planned roads and skid tracks. As such, any

    reductions in the area occupied by such impervious surfaces as

    well as improvements in their lay-out can be expected - and have

    been shown - to bring about substantial reductions in adverse

    downstream effects, and thus off-site costs. Giving that stream

    sediment loads associated with improved logging practices are

    typically 2550 of those that would have been recorded in the

    absence of prevention measures, a first idea of the associated

    savings in water treatment costs can be obtained. Depending on

    the volume of raw water that needs to be treated, such costs can

    easily run into thousands of dollars per day.

    Building all-weather roads in remote terrain in the humid tropics is

    generally a very costly affair. As such, any reductions in the

    length of the extraction system quickly become economically

    attractive, particularly in steep terrain, Under such conditions the

    use of skyline yarding systems, which may need only one-third of

    the roads and tracks required by ground-based extraction sys-

    terns, provide an economically viable, yet highly environmentally

    friendly, alternative, even before off-site benefits are taken into

    account.

    Improved

    selective logging

    practices are the key

    to sustained

    production from

    moist tropical

    Benefits outweigh costs

    forests

    Evidently the careful planning of operations leads to increased

    efficiency of logging as well as environmental protection. Indeed,

    the experience gained to date strongly suggests that the benefits

    of improved logging practices outweigh the costs incurred, not

    only in terms of short-term, on-site benefits but especially when

    both on-site and off-site factors are considered in the longer term.

    The evidence may not be complete at present, particularly with

    respect to the costing of reduced downstream hydrological pro-

    blems or improved future forest productivity. Nevertheless, few

    can disagree that improved selective logging practices are the key

    to sustained production from moist tropical forests.

    44

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    47/52

    SELECTED REFERENCES

    In keeping with the sty/e and format of this Series, no specific refer-

    ences to literature have been included within the main body of the text.

    However, the following books and articles comprise our principal

    sources of information, and form a basis for further reading.

    Abdul Rahim Nik, 1990. Effects of Selective Logging Methods on

    Streamflow Parameters in Berembun Watershed, Peninsular

    Malaysia. PhD Thesis, Department of Forestry, University Col-

    lege of Wales, Bangor, U.K.

    Adams, P.W. & Andrus, C.W. 1991. Planning timber harvesting oper-

    ations to reduce soil and water problems in humid tropic steep-

    lands. Paper presented at the International Symposium on

    Forest Harvesting in South-east Asia, Singapore, June 1991.

    Appanah, S. & Putz, F. 1984. Climber abundance in virgin dipterocarp

    forest and the effect of pre-felling climber cutting on logging

    damage. The Malaysian Forester 47: 335-342.

    Blakeney, K.J. 1992. Cable and helicopter logging for reduced damage.

    Paper presented at the international Symposium on Harvesting

    and Silviculture for Sustainable Forestry in the Tropics, Kuala

    Lumpur, October 1992.

    Brown, G.S. 1955. Timber extraction methods in N. Borneo. The Mal-

    aysian Forester 18: 11 -1 32.

    Bruijnzeel, L.A. 1990. Hydrology of Moist Tropical Forests and Effects

    of Conversion: A State of Know/edge Review. UNESCO, Paris,

    and Free University, Amsterdam.

    Bruijnzeel, L.A. 1992. Managing tropical forestry watersheds for pro-

    duction: where contradictory theory and practice co-exist. In:

    Wise Management of Tropical Forests 7992 (ed. by F.R. Miller &

    K.L. Adam), pp. 37-75. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford.

    Burgess, P.F. 1971. The effect of logging on hill dipterocarp forests.

    Malayan Nature Journal 24: 231-237.

    Cassells, D.S. et a/, 1984. Watershed forestry management practices in

    the tropical rainforest of N.E. Australia. In: Effects of Forestry

    Land Use on Erosion and Slope Stability (ed. by C.L. OLoughlin

    & A.J. Pearce), pp. 289-298. IUFRO, Vienna.

    Clinnick, P.F. 1985. Buffer strip management in forest operations: A

    review. Australian Forestry 48: 34-45.

    De Graaf, N.R. 1986. A Silvicultural System for Natural Regeneration of

    Tropical Rain Forest in Suriname. Pudoc, Wageningen, the

    Netherlands.

    Dykstra, D.P. & Heinrich, R. 1992. Sustaining tropical forests through

    environmentally sound harvesting practices. Unasylva 169: 9-l 5.

    Douglas, I. et a/. 1992. The impact of selective commercial logging on

    stream hydrology, chemistry and sediment loads in the Ulu

    Segama rain forest, Sabah. Ph ilosophical Transactions of the

    Royal Society B 335: 397-406.

    45

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    48/52

    Gillman, G.P. et al. 1985. The effect on some soil chemical properties

    of the selective logging of a north Queensland rainforest. Forest

    Ecology and Management 12: 195214.

    Gilmour, D.A. 1977. Logging and the environment, with particular refer-

    ence to soil and stream protection in tropical rainforest situat-

    ions. FAD Watershed Management Guide no.1, pp. 223-235,

    FAO, Rome.

    Gomez-Pompa, A. et al. 1990. Rain Forest Regeneration and Manage-

    ment. Man and the Biosphere Series Volume 6, UNESCO, Paris

    & Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnfotth, U.K.

    Hendrison, J. 1990. Damage-controlled Logging in Managed Tropical

    Rain Forest in Suriname. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    ITT0 Tropical Forest Management Update, 1991-l 994. Various issues.

    ANUTECH Pty Ltd., Canberra.

    Jonkers, W.B.J. 1987. Vegetation Structure, Logging Damage and Silvi-

    culture in a Tropical Rain Forest. Pudoc, Wageningen, the

    Netherlands.

    Kamaruzaman Jusoff, 1991. Effect of tracked and rubber-tyred logging

    machines on soil physical properties of the Berkelah Forest

    Reserve, Malaysia. Pertanika 14: 1-l 1.

    Ludwig, Ft. 1992. Cable crane yarding: an economical and ecologically

    sustainable system for commercial timber harvesting in logged-

    over rain forests of the Philippines. Paper presented at the

    International Symposium on Harvesting and Silviculture for

    Sustainable Forestry in the Tropics, Kuala Lumpur, Oct. 1992.

    Malmer, A. & Grip, H. 1990. Soil disturbance and loss of infiltrability

    caused by mechanized and manual extraction of tropical rain

    forest in Sabah, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 38:

    l-12.

    Marn, H.M. & Jonkers, W.B. 1981. Logging damage in tropical high

    forest. Working Paper no. 5. FAO/UNDP Forestry Development

    Project Sarawak, Kuching, 15 pp.

    Pearce, A.J. & Hamilton, L.S. 1986. Water and Soil Conservation

    Guidelines for Land-use Planning. Report of a seminar-workshop

    held at FTC Gympie, Queensland, Australia.

    Poels, R.L.H. 1987. Soils, Water and Nutrients in a Forest Ecosystem in

    Suriname. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

    Proctor, J. 1987. Nutrient cycling in primary and old secondary rain-

    forests. Applied Geography 7: 135-l 52.

    Van der Plas, MC. & Bruijnzeel, L.A. 1993. Impact of mechanized

    selective logging of rain forest on topsoil infiltrability in the Upper

    Segama area, Sabah, Malaysia. International Association of

    Hydrological Sciences Publication no. 216: 203-211.

    Whitmore, T.C. 1990. An introduction to Tropical Rain Forests.

    Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Zulkifli Yusopp, 1989. Effects of selective logging methods on dissolved

    nutrient exports in Berembun watershed, Peninsular Malaysia.

    Paper presented at the Regional Seminar on Tropical Forest

    Hydrology, Kuala Lumpur, September 1989.

    46

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    49/52

    The International Hydrological Programme

    The developing nations of the humid tropics of the world will

    represent about one-third of the earths population by the end of

    the present decade. In the 21st century, these nations will pass

    the developed countries in numbers of people. Such a population

    shift will alter existing international economic and geopolitical

    relationships. With this major change looming on the horizon,

    coupled with the need to treat the tropical resources wisely, the

    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

    (UNESCO) and the United Nations Environment Programme

    (UNEP) joined with 22 other organizations in July 1989 to hold

    the International Colloquium on the Development of Hydrologic

    and Water Management Strategies in the Humid Tropics at

    Australias James Cook University. The International Hydrological

    Programme (IHP) of UNESCO was the lead organization.

    The Colloquium developed strong evidence that the present situ-

    ation, including the question of tropical forest depletion, was not

    only in need of serious consideration, but that the potential for

    vastly increased human impacts will be quite significant if they are

    not adequately considered now. It was noted that although the

    general characteristic of the humid regions is an abundance of

    water, this very abundance - and the spatial and temporal variabi-

    lity of its distribution

    - is one of the leading contributors to the

    difficulties.

    An executive summary of the Colloquium was released shortly

    after it was held, whereas the formal scientific text embodying the

    Colloquium papers and supplementary material was published by

    Cambridge University Press in the summer of 1993 under the title

    Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics, with M.

    Bonell, M.M. Hufschmidt and J.S. Gladwell as editors. A related

    publication, entitled Hydrology of Moist Tropical Forests and

    Effects of Conversion: A State of Knowledge Review, was produ-

    ced by the joint efforts of IHPs Humid Tropics Programme, the

    National Committee for IHP of the Netherlands and the Vrije Uni-

    versiteit of Amsterdam in October 1990.

    The present popularized volume on the impacts of tropical forest

    exploitation is one of several such publications having their origin

    in the Colloquium. Others dealt with the disappearance of tropical

    forests, the hydrology of small tropical islands, the water-related

    problems of large tropical cities, the role of women, etc. Additional

    47

  • 7/24/2019 Impacto Ambiental de La Deforestacin

    50/52

    volumes are in preparation, including the companion volume to

    the present one -

    Environmental Impacts of Tropical Forest

    Conversion to Other Land Uses.

    Further information on any of these publications can be obtained

    from the International Hydrological Programme of the Division of

    Water Sciences within UNESCO (see back cover for address).

    MAB Programme activities in the humid tropics

    Improving the scientific understanding of natural and social

    processes relating to mans interactions with his environment,

    providing information useful to decision-making on resource use,

    promoting the conservation of genetic diversity as an integral part

    of land manageme