14
Impact of New Public Management and Public Governance on municipal real estate management in Poland Bartłomiej Marona Cracow University of Economics Department of Real Estate and Investments Economics ERES Conference June 28 - July 1, 2017, DELFT

Impact of New Public Management and Public Governance on

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Impact of New Public Management and Public Governance on municipal real

estate management in Poland

Bartłomiej Marona

Cracow University of EconomicsDepartment of Real Estate and Investments Economics

ERES Conference

June 28 - July 1, 2017, DELFT

Agenda

• Research objectives and research framework

• Current research in PREM

• Survey study

• Summary

Research objective

The research goal was boiled down to the assessment of the role ofindividual concepts of public management in the process of real estate management in Polish municipalities.

Theoretical framework of the study

Public Real Estate

Management

New Public Management

CorporateReal Estate

ManagementPublic

governance

Source: own study

PREM topics during ERES conferences

Conference All papers PREM papers Affiliation

ERES 2015

(Istanbul)

235 2 Netherland,

Estonia

ERES 2014

(Bucharest)

216 1 Netherland

ERES 2013

(Wien)

270 3 Estonia, Poland, Germany

ERES 2012

(Edinburgh)

307 1 Poland

ERES 2011

(Eindhoven)

232 3 Netherland, New Zealand

ERES 2010

(Mediolan)

333 3 Germany, Italy

TOTAL 1 593 13 -Source: Marona (2017)

Lp. Autors/Year Method/ Place M Paradigm

1. D-L Constantin, C.

Mitrut, R.M. Grosu, M.

Profiroiu, A.E. Iosif ,

(2016).

Survey research in Romania (8 municipalities). Part of greater research in South

and Eastern Europe - EU-funded project entitled ‘Municipal Property

Management in South-East European Cities’ (PROMISE).

New public

management

2. M. Gross, R. Źróbek,

(2015).

Modified delphi method – compilation of delphi method and questionnaire.

17 complete responses were received from 14 countries (mainly from Europe and

3 from Asia).

Good Governance

3. B. Marona (2016). Survey research - Kraków Metropolitan Area - 25 questionnaires were returned,

that is 49% of the sent ones.

New Public

management,

Good Governance

4. Z. Pozega, B. Crnkovic,

A. Zivkovic, (2014).

Literture review (Croatia) New Public

Management

5. Y. Lu (2011) Survey research based on 37 questionnaires (property and other state asset)

conducted in USA

New Public

Management

6. FAO (2007) Secondary research. Research conducted by Land Tenure and Management Unit

from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United nation (FAO).

International research based on data from World Bank, United Nations Human

Settlements Programme and International Feeration of Surveyors.

Good Governence

Source: own study

PUBLIC MANAGEMENT perspective in real estate management research

Survey research

• Preliminary research - January 2016 (01 Polish metropolitan area)

• Current research – May/June 2017 (all Polish metropolitan areas)

• 304 questionaries (response rate: 34% - 103 municipalities)

22 questions (from 35) are dealing with NPM and GG

NPM

According to Ch. Hood (1991) the doctrine includes 7 standards:

• ‘hands –on professional management’ in the public sector;

• explicit standards and measure of performance;

• greater emphasis on output control;

• shift to disaggregation of units in the public sector;

• shift to greater competition in public sector;

• stress on greater discipline and parsimony in resource use.

GG

According to European Commission (2001) 5 principles:

• openness (transparent working, active communication, accessible language);

• participation (wide involvement throughout the policy chain, and especially by central governments);

• accountability (making legislative and executive roles clearer and ensuring that institutions take responsibility for what they do);

• effectiveness (ensuring policies are timely, have clear objectives, are appropriately evaluated, are proportionate and involve decision-making at the most suitable level);

• coherence (requiring political leadership and institutional responsibility in ensuring consistency in approach).

Characteristics of respondents

urban22%

semruban23%

rural55%

Source: own study

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

correlation between staff bonus and REM effects?

outsourcing?

do you now NPM principles?

do you know GG principles?

publishing real estate reports online?

salary differentiation?

benchmark assessments?

indicators used to measure effectiveness of REM?

systematic valuation?

prepare accomplishment reports at the end of the year?

professional real estate education?

residents possibility to express opinions and co-decide in an organized way ?

complete information on websites about municipal property?

staff experience in the private sector?

performence discussed at management meetings?

complete information on website about property investments?

internal control ?

timeliness of the performed real estate management tasks?

performed real estate management objectives?

profiled trainings?

Absolutely no Mostly no Mostly yes Absolutely yes

Source: own study

Summary

• It should be stated that both the NPM and the GG concept do not constitute a benchmark model in the practice of municipal real estate management in Poland.

• The concepts are treated more as a set of tools from which the majority of municipalities choose only some, selected instruments.

NEXT STEP

• correlation between 1) public management tools and 2) RE performance and effectiveness

• more extensive statistical analysis (type of municipality, metropolitanarea…)

• case study research

Literature

• Constantin D-L, Mitrut C., Grosu R.M., Profiroiu M., Iosif A.E., (2016), Municipal real properties and challenges of new public management: a spotlight on Romania, “International Review of Administrative Sciences”.

• Good Governance in land tenure and administration, (2007), FAO Land tenure studies, Rome.

• Gross M., Źróbek R., (2015), Good governance in some public real estate management systems, “Land use policy”,No. 49.

• Hood Ch., (1991), A public management for all seasons? “Public Administration”, Vol. 69, No 1.

• Lu Y., (2011), New Public Management reforms in public asset management as the state governments of the United States, International Conference on Public Administration (ICPA ).

• Marona B., (2016), Public management in real estate area – some empirical evidence from Polish municipality. “Real Estate Management and Valuation”, Vol. 24, No. 4.

• Marona B., (2017), Nieruchomości publiczne jako przedmiot badań nauk o zarządzaniu, „Organizacja i Kierowanie”, (in press).

• Pozega Z., Crnkovic B., Zivkovic A., (2014), Effective management of state property as prerequisites for economic development, Conference Proceedings: “Economy of Eastern Croatia Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow”, Vol. 3.

dr. Bartłomiej [email protected]

Many thanks for attention