Impact Of Job Analysis on job performance

Journal of Diversity Management – Second Quarter 2010 Volume 5, Number 2

17

Impact Of Job Analysis

On Job Performance:

Analysis Of A Hypothesized Model Rehman Safdar, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), Pakistan

Ajmal Waheed, Quaid-e-Azam University, Pakistan

Khattak Hamid Rafiq, National University of Modern Languages, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

Researchers have developed a relationship between HRM practices and organizational

performance, but the relationship between HRM practice like job analysis – employee Job

performance remains unexplored. This paper, based on a study of employees of Pakistan Public

sector regulatory authorities of telecommunication, oil and gas, power, media, security

exchange, banking sector and organizations being regulated by these authorities is an attempt to

develop and test a hypothesized model linking HR importance of job analysis with employee job

performance. Survey results of 568 employees indicated that practice of job analysis was

strongly related to employee job performance. The findings suggest that an organisation-wide

policy of job analysis is an important source of competitive advantage in its own right, and

requires due attention of HR professionals. The study extends the findings of the HR–employee

job performance research pursued in Western countries to a non-Western context.

Keywords: Human resource management; HR practices in regulatory authorities; HR-performance linkage; Job

analysis; Job performance; Job satisfaction; Job retention; Recruitment Process; Knowledge, skills and abilities

INTRODUCTION

n western countries human resource management (HRM) research has shown a shift from micro-

analytical approach (individual performance) to a macro-strategic (organizational performance)

perspective but in a country like Pakistan micro level approach is yet to be analysed. Distant from the

traditional personnel role, human resource management (HRM) has recognized new roles in terms of employee

champion, change agent and strategic partner (Ulrich, 1997). The question of how HRM policies and practices are

linked to organizational performance has been a subject of great interest to both academics and practitioners (Wright

et al., 1999). However, linking HRM practices to employee job performance is unexplored and required a great

attention particularly in the context of Pakistan public sector organizations. Job analysis, a human resource

management practice is a systematic process for collecting and analysing information about jobs. Job analysis data is

perhaps the most widely gathered type of organizational information for developing human resource management

systems. It forms the foundation upon which many important HR management systems are built (Butler & Harvey,

1988), including recruitment and selection systems, training and development programs, performance management

programs and compensation systems. The importance of obtaining job analysis data and assessing the reliability of

such data has become a salient issue to both practitioners and researchers. It has been estimated that large

organizations spend between $150,000 and $4,000,000 annually on job analyses (Levine, Sistrunk, McNutt, & Gael,

1988).

Earlier research on job analysis focused on methodological aspects of the concept of job analysis. These

research efforts made an important contribution to the field of HRM by developing techniques and procedures to

generate accurate and practically useful job-related data (McCormick, 1979; Cornelius et al., 1979; Ash and Levine,

1980; Bemis et al., 1983; Gael, 1988). This laid the groundwork that allowed HR professionals to identify and

I


18

examine several possible applications of job analysis information. Currently, some researchers in the west have

moved a step forward by stressing the importance of job analysis as a strategic HRM practice with potential

contribution to organizational performance (Cascio, 1998; Bowin and Harvey, 2001). With increasing recognition of

the HR–performance linkage, it has been suggested that organizations that actively pursue job analysis as a Human

Resource Planning (HRP) strategy are likely to gain competitive advantage (Anthony et al., 2002; Dessler, 2003). In

Pakistan impact of job analysis on employee job performance is yet to be explored. Continuing this line of analysis,

this study examines the impact of job analysis on job performance with survey data collected from the 568

employees of public sector organisations particularly regulatory authorities and organizations regulated by these

authorities of Pakistan.

Pakistan is a developing country in the South-Asia region. Apart from having ample natural resources,

Pakistan is widely known as an open and forward-thinking country, willing to test with innovative management

practices and development models that will assist it in seeking an effective diversification of its economy. With

invasion of multinational companies over the past decade, particularly under the umbrella of Regulatory Authorities,

Pakistan has achieved an inspiring mix of domestic and foreign companies. The growing competition in a large

market (with a little over 165 million population) has made both domestic and foreign companies intensely

productivity cognisant. This, in turn, has generated a strong interest and enthusiasm among organizations,

particularly in the public sector, to search vigorously for the best management practices in all fields of HRM to

improve their productivity and overall performance. Thus, Pakistan offers an appropriate setting to examine how a

basic HR practice, such as job analysis, which has received considerable attention in Western countries as a useful

HR planning tool, affects employee job performance in a developing country.

The current study may also be seen as an opportunity to validate and extend the findings of HR–

performance studies conducted in Western countries to a non-Western context. This study was designed to elaborate

this linkage theoretically and test it with an empirical data obtained from a survey of 568 employees from 6 (Six)

regulatory authorities in Telecom, oil and gas, power, media, security exchange and banking sector and 9 (Nine)

organisations related with these regulators. Present study has three potential contributions to research and practice.

First, Human resource planning in the public sector organizations, secondly impact of job analysis on employee job

performance and lastly to examine the moderating effects of recruitment process with job performance. Empirical

research studies have found a significant relationship between HRM practices and organizational outcomes such as

employee turnover (Arthur, 1994; Huselid, 1995; Sivasubramanyam and Venkataratnam, 1998) By including job

satisfaction and retention in job performance in the hypothesized frame work, it is hoped that present study would

open a new line of inquisition into the affective roles of job analysis in job performance. It is also expected that by

collecting data in a South Asian context, a greater variety of research contexts and results would be available for

synthesis in the future.

HR PRACTICE–PERFORMANCE MODEL

Researchers have presented some conceptual models in the past. Beer et al., (1984) identified competence,

commitment, congruence and cost effectiveness as an intermediary variables. Becker et al. (1997); Becker and

Huselid (1998) have proposed that intervening variables such as employee skills, employee motivation, job design

and work structure link operating performance, which in turn influences profits and market value. Boudreau (1998)

has found capability, opportunity and motivation as intermediary variables for individual performance, which results

in organizational success. In this study an effort has bee made to explore the intervening role of recruitment process

in the context of skill, knowledge and abilities for better job performance.

An analysis of previous research works on HRM has identified some immediate effects of HRM practices,

known as HRM outcomes. Such HRM outcomes include knowledge, skill and abilities or competence (Schuler,

1989; Becker et al., 1997; Pfeffer, 1994; Barney, 1991; Lengnick-Hall 1999; Sandberg, 2000; Beer et al., 1985;

Lado and Wilson, 1994), Gaining a lead from the concept of the self insight which is skill, knowledge and abilities

and job insight, human resource practices, like job analysis , tasks and responsibilities conceptual models and

immediate HRM outcomes identified by prior researchers, it is possible to develop an integrated HR practice-

employee job performance model.


19

A CONCEPTIONAL MODEL FOR HR PRACTICE– EMPLOYEE JOB PERFORMANCE LINKAGE

There are diverse stakeholders attached with an organization, the major strategic goal of an organization is

higher performance (Becker and Huselid, 1998). Major two types of performance are financial and operational.

Financial performance of an organization depends upon a large extent on effective operational performance of their

employees. Function of employees, processes and technology comes under the operational performance of an

organization. (Curtis et al., 1995). Effective and efficient interaction of employee with the technology and processes

is only possible if the employees in the organization are competent enough, with the required knowledge, skill and

abilities (Huselid, 1995; Barney and Wright, 1997).

Knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA) or Competence of an individual is an important factor which decides

operational effectiveness in terms of providing quality performance within a short time (Brooks, 1987; Wynekoop

and Walz, 2000). An organization‟s understanding of the available and needed Knowledge, Skills and Abilities

(KSA) allow them to plan for the changes to new jobs and recruit the right person required for achieving their

organizational goals thereby sustaining them through the indecisive times (Cascio 1995).

HRM practices such as job analysis, recruitment and selection, training and development, work

environment and performance appraisal may enhance the competence of employees for high performance (Latham

and Wexley, 1981; Snell and Dean, 1992; Lado and Wilson, 1993; Terpestra and Rozell, 1993; Koch and McGrath,

1996; Pfeffer, 1998). Apart from interaction with technology and processes, relations with employees working

within the departments and the synergy of such effective teamwork decide the operational success (Barney and

Wright, 1997). To achieve better results, effective synergic interaction in the working group is a necessary

requirement.

In view of above, while the potential contribution of the importance and practice of job analysis to

employee Job performance has not been systematically investigated, there is enough subjective evidence in the

current HR-performance literature to be expecting a positive impact of job analysis on employee job performance.

Sherman et al. claims, the main purpose of job analysis is to improve organizational performance and productivity‟

(1998: 90). Organizational performance, however, depends upon the individual performance. In a culture like

Pakistan, human resource practices are being adopted particularly in public sector organizations however,

importance of job analysis and practice of job analysis in such organizations and its impact on employee job

performance is yet to be tested.

Job performance and job satisfaction relation has a controversial history. The Hawthorne studies, conducted

in the 1930s, are frequently attributed with making researchers aware of the effects of employee attitudes on

performance. After the Hawthorne studies, researchers started taking a significant glance at the perception that a

“happy employee is a productive employee.” Most of the previously reviews of the literature suggested a weak and

somewhat inconsistent relationship between job satisfaction and employee performance.

A literature review in 1985 recommended that the statistical correlation between job satisfaction and job

performance was about .17 (Iaffaldano & Muchinsky, 1985). Accordingly, authors concluded that the apparent

relationship between job satisfaction and performance was a “management fad” and “illusory.” This study had an

important impact on researchers, and in some cases on organizations, with some managers and HR practitioners

concluding that the relationship between job satisfaction and performance was insignificant.

Further research, however, does not agree with this conclusion. Organ (1988) suggests that the failure to

find a strong relationship between job satisfaction and job performance is due to the slight means often used to

define job performance. Organ argued that when job performance is defined to include important behaviours not

generally reflected in performance appraisals, such as organizational citizenship behaviours, its relationship with job

satisfaction improves. Research tends to support Organ‟s suggestion in that job satisfaction correlates with

organizational citizenship behaviours (Organ & Ryan, 1995). In addition, in a more recent and comprehensive

review of 301 studies, Judge, Thoresen, Bono, and Patton (2001) found that when the correlations are appropriately

corrected (for sampling and measurement errors), the average correlation between job satisfaction and job

performance is a higher than .30. In accumulation, the relationship between job satisfaction and performance was


20

found to be even higher for professional jobs rather than non-professional jobs. Thus, contrary to earlier reviews, it

does appear that job satisfaction is, in fact, projecting of job performance, and the relationship is even stronger for

professional jobs.

Most of the literature on job retention is about full-time employees. The majority of the studies addressed

the causes, effects and results of turnover. Several studies found that turnover rate was associated with employees'

demographic and personal characteristics, overall job satisfaction, organization and work environment, job analysis,

intrinsic motivation, external labour environment, employees' perceptions of alternative jobs, absenteeism, lateness

and job performance (Pizam & Ellis, 1996; Boles, Ross, & Johnson, 1995).

Taking a lead from the increasing literature on HR-performance linkage (Guest, 1997; Wright et al., 1998;

Richardson and Thompson, 1999; Truss, 2001; Greer, 2001) in Figure 1 a conceptual / hypothesized model has

been outlined that shall develop and test in this study. In the proposed model, we treat the importance of job analysis

and practice of job analysis as an independent variable and recruitment KSA as an intervening variables. With

respect to job performance, the present study, in gratitude of the multidimensional nature of the concept, defined

performance in terms of achieving superior results in the following six key areas: use of specific skills, performance

enhancement, achieving the goals, consistency with goals, financial rewards and appreciation. These performance

dimensions are the primary dependent variables in the proposed model. It shows one possible way of explaining

how Job analysis can lead to job performance with the moderating role of recruitment.

Figure I Hypothesized HR-Performance linkage model Method

Job Analysis

JA1 (Importance of

Job Analysis)

Job Analysis

JA2 (Practice of Job

analysis)

Rec

ruit

men

t

KS

A

(K

no

wle

dg

e, S

kil

ls,

Ab

ilit

ies)

Job

Per

form

an

ce

Job

Satisfaction

Job

Retention

Intervening

variable Dependent

variable

Ind

epen

den

t

var

iab

le


21

METHOD

Sample And Data Collection

There was no such HRM-performance study has been reported in the Public sector regulatory authorities

where there is a possible direct link between employee‟s performance and human resource practices. The regulatory

regime has been widely adopted in the public sector of Pakistan. The rapidly expanding Telecom, Power, Media, Oil

& gas and banking sector has witnessed a strong demand for qualified personnel in recent years. In general, these

organizations are engaged in the human resource management activities more than other public sector organizations.

On a more macro level, these sectors have been actively pursued as a major engine for economic growth and

productivity improvement in Pakistan in the past one-and-a-half decades. The sample consisted of the regulatory

authorities and organizations linked with these authorities in Pakistan. Detail is given in table 1.

Table 1: Employees from Regulatory Authorities and related organisations % (N= 568)

Organisations

NEPRA (National Electric and Power Regulatory Authority) 7 percent

OGRA (Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority) 8 percent

PTA (Pakistan Telecommunication Authority) 6 percent

PEMRA (Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority) 6 percent

STATE BANK 8 percent

SECP (Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan) 6 percent

IESCO (Islamabad Electric Supply Company) 6 percent

OGDCL (Oil and Gas Development Corporation Limited) 6 percent

PTCL (Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited) 6 percent

UFONE 7 percent

TELECARD 5 percent

PTV (Pakistan Television) 8 percent

HBL (Habib Bank Limited) 8 percent

PICIC ( Pakistan Industrial ) 6 percent

KHUSHHALI BANK 7 percent

HRM practice and processes variables, such as job analysis, job performance, recruitment process, job

satisfaction and job retention, were studied from the perspectives of employees of middle and top management

having the knowledge of human resource practices. Since employees of these organizations were the immediate

beneficiaries of HR practices, and the right people to judge their level of competence, satisfaction and productivity

from their experience, the job analysis questionnaire were administered to them. It may be noticed that HR

professionals have detailed information on HRM policies and practices of the organization and employees were fully

aware about these practices. At the same time, it may also be accepted that an HR policy becomes a practice only if

it is implemented by the employees at middle and lower levels.

Huselid et al. (1997) argue that HRM research has to take into account the effective practices rather than

documented policies. Ideal respondents to measure the existence of an effective practice may be the beneficiaries of

such practices, i.e. employees.

Potential participants were identified from among full-time employees working in these organisations and

they were fully briefed about the questionnaire and human resource practices mentioned therein. A total of 750

questionnaire were distributed and 588 five hundred and eighty eight were returned, yielding a response rate of 78.4

percent. Twenty questionnaires were incomplete and discarded. The final sample consisted of 568 cases. The

questionnaire was written in English. The sample comprised 25.9 percent females and 74.1percent males which

indicates the male dominated participation in jobs due to quota system in public sector organizations. Quota for

women, districts, and tribal population though defensible under certain considerations, are non-the-less pernicious to

the principle of merit-based recruitment. This has already devastated the civil service, apart from affecting the

quality in general, it has fuelled factionalism within the civil service on regional, sexual and/ or other grounds.


22

More than 65 percent participants have attained their master degree level. Although more than 60 percent

are permanent employees but there is till trend of contractual employment. Majority of employees is directly

recruited which is 67.2 percent which shows slow and less promotions as most of the employees have a service

under 10 years. More than 60 percent are on the same position within five years of service. Recruitment and other

personnel matter are dealt by the Human Resource Department to the extent of 77 percent which indicates and

justify a separate HR department to look after HR issues and implement HR strategies and practices, whereas

recruitment matters of the most of the public sector organizations are being dealt by the Federal Public Service

Commission (FPSC) at federal level and Provincial Public Service Commission at province level. Profile of

respondents is mentioned in table 2

Table 2: Profile of Respondents ( N= 568 )

Variables Percentage (%)

Gender Male 74.1

Female 25.9

Age Below 25 years 21.0

25-35 years 47.0

35-45 years 16.7

45-55 years 12.7

55-60 2.5

Above 60 0.2

Educational level PhD 1.2

Masters Degree 66.4

B.Sc. Engineering 5.6

Graduation 18.3

Intermediate 6.9

Matriculation 1.6

Job Status Permanent 64.6

Contractual 31.0

Deputation 2.8

Daily wagers 1.6

Job Category Technical 28.7

Managerial/Admin 47.5

Any other 23.8

Job Level Top 4.9

Middle 44.9

Supervisor 23.2

Non-managerial 26.9

Mode of appointment Direct 67.6

Promotion 28.2

Deputation 4.2

Number of years

In present Organization

Less than 1 12.7

1 - 2 26.1

3 - 5 32.9

6 - 10 10.2

Over 10 18.1

Number of years

In present position

Less than 1 25.9

1 - 2 28.9

3 - 5 31.0

6 - 10 6.0

Over 10 8.3

Recruitment Matters dealt by HR Department 77.5

Any other 22.5


23

MEASUREMENT OF JOB ANALYSIS

There was no prior instrument available to measure Job analysis from the viewpoint of public sector

professionals, a new instrument was developed on the basis of an exhaustive review of literature on Human

Resource Management and people management practices (Curtis et al., 1995; Agrawal, 1999). Face validity has

been established after a thorough review by experts in the field (Three academicians, five practitioners and two

consultants). Job analysis was measured in two items separately, Importance of Job analysis and practice/ frequency

of job analysis . Importance of job analysis was measured on 6-point Likert scale having responses ranging from 0

(Not performed) to 5 (when it is felt essential).

Unidimensionality was assessed using factor analysis. The twenty statements, forming the human resource

practices scale, were analysed for principal factors and the extracted factor matrix was analysed with Principal

Component Analysis , rotation method , Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization. (Huselid, 1995). Four factors with an

eigen value higher than 1.360, accounting for 21.51 per cent of the variance, emerged. (Appendix- 1)

Internal consistency of the scale was tested by computing Cronbach alphas and alpha value was found to be

higher than 0.70 in all factors except one variable which was less than .60. The complete instrument consists of

twenty five items spread over the six dimensions, such as importance of job analysis, practice of job analysis, job

performance, job satisfaction and job retention.

MEASUREMENT OF PRACTICE / FREQUENCY OF JOB ANALYSIS

Regular practice of job analysis serves as an invaluable source of feedback for employees and their

supervisors. HR managers can use this feedback to develop such useful documents like job description and

programmes as job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment to achieve a better match between job demands and

employee skills and abilities. These programmes allow more effective management of employees‟ job-related

complaints and grievances, and can help forge amore favourable organizational climate (Ivancevich, 1998).

Practice of Job analysis for this study was measured on 6-point Likert scale having responses ranging from

0 (Not performed) to 5 (when it is felt essential) Since the present study was interested in the frequency or regularity

with which organisations perform job analysis, the survey participants were requested to report as to how often their

organizations conducted job analyses. The responses were recorded as „not performed‟, „every year‟, „every two

years‟, „after every three years‟, „after four-to-five years‟ and „when it is felt essential‟.

MEASUREMENT OF JOB PERFORMANCE

In this study, job performance was measured in two dimensions. Operational performance and financial

performance. Operational performance was defined in terms of employee retention, achievement of the goals of

organization, employee productivity and objectivity of performance evaluation system. Financial performance was

measured in terms of monetary and non-monetary benefits of the employees.

Job performance was measured with 6 items on a 5-point likert scale, respondents were asked to respond to

the different aspects of their jobs like performance enhancement on job, objective achievement, consistency with the

goals of the organization, objectivity of the performance evaluation system, monetary and non-monetary benefits.

The measure has good reliability properties. Cronbach‟s alpha value was .77

MEASUREMENT OF JOB SATISFACTION

Job satisfaction was assessed from the respondents indicated the degree to which they were satisfied with

the six factors inner satisfaction, respect, sense of fulfilment, peer support, cared by the organization. A five point

likert scale was used. 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree nor disagree), 4(agree) and 5(strongly agree).

Cronbach‟s alpha was calculated to test the reliability of the data and was found to be .72


24

MEASUREMENT OF JOB RETENTION

Retention was measured with 6 items, respondents were asked to respond, on a 5-point likert scale,

1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree nor disagree), 4(agree) and 5(strongly agree). The measure has

moderate reliability properties. Cronbach‟s alpha value was .57

MEASUREMENT OF RECRUITMENT KSA

Recruitment KSA was measured with 5 items on a 5-point likert scale, respondents were asked to respond

to the different aspects of their skills, knowledge and abilities. The measure has good reliability properties.

Cronbach‟s alpha value was .73

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics

Table 3 provides means and standard deviations of all the variables under study. Table 4 shows the

bivariate correlation of HR practices, intervening variable and dependant variable.

Table 3 Means and standard deviations

Table 4 Correlations

ESTABLISHING A LINKAGE BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND JOB PERFORMANCE

Figure 2 shows the significant and non-significant relationships found in the HR–performance model tested. HR

practice job analysis 1 have positive correlations with job analysis 2, intervening variable, recruitment KSA, job

performance and job satisfaction but has a negative correlation with retention. In the same way, job performance has

shown a strong significant correlation with job analysis 1, recruitment, job satisfaction, job retention but a weak

correlation with job analysis 2.

As mentioned earlier the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance has a controversial

history. A weak and somewhat inconsistent relationship between job satisfaction and performance have been shown.

A review of the literature in 1985 suggested that the statistical correlation between job satisfaction and performance

was about .17 (Iaffaldano & Muchinsky, 1985). Correlation between job satisfaction and job performance in this

study was .52 which does not support to the previous findings. This study had an important impact on researchers,

and in some cases on organizations, with some managers and HR practitioners concluding that the relationship

between job satisfaction and performance was trivial.

Sl.No Variable Number of

items

Mean Standard

Deviation

1 JA1 Importance of job Analysis 1 2.83 1.00

2 JA2 Practice of job analysis 1 2.19 2.14

3 Job Performance 6 3.68 0.65

4 Recruitment ( KSA ) 5 4.06 0.52

5 Job Satisfaction 6 3.71 0.57

6 Job Retention 6 3.17 0.60

Variables Mean Std. Deviation 1 2 3 4 5

1. JA1 Importance of job Analysis 2.83 1.00

2. JA2 Practice of job analysis 2.19 2.14 0.063

3. Job Performance 3.68 0.65 .193(**) 0.054

4. Recruitment ( KSA ) 4.06 0.52 .218(**) -0.078 .466(**)

5. Job Satisfaction 3.71 0.57 .217(**) .088(*) .518(**) .195(**)

6. Job Retention 3.17 0.60 -0.043 -0.069 .230(**) .084(*) .340(**)

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).


25

Figure 2 HR-Performance linkage tested model

In addition, in a comprehensive review of 301 studies, Judge, Thoresen, Bono, and Patton (2001) found that

when the correlations are appropriately corrected (for sampling and measurement errors), the average correlation

between job satisfaction and job performance is a higher .30. This finding is supportive of present study sampling

and measurement as results of job satisfaction and job performance (.52) is a higher than .30 Thus, contrary to

earlier reviews, it does appear that job satisfaction is, in fact, predictive of job performance and the relationship is

stronger.

The results showed that the job satisfaction have a highly significant influence on job performance.

Specifically, the more satisfied a job holder is with his/her job, the more important he/she regards the organizational

skills and cognitive skills as in the job, and the higher level of technological skills, organizational skills and

cognitive skills he/she displays at job. In a similar seam, the higher level of affective commitment a job-holder has

to his organization, the more important he/she regards the cognitive skills as in the job, and the higher level of

cognitive skills the job-holder exhibits at job. Also, the more involved a job-holder becomes in his/her job, the more

important he/she regards the organizational skills and cognitive skills as in the job, and the higher level of the above

two skills he/she reveals at work.

This study has explored a strong relationships showing highly significant correlations between job

performance and job satisfaction (r=.52) This positive highly significant relationship is the addition to the literature on

human resource management specifically in the context of Pakistan a non-western country.

Job Analysis

JA1 (Importance of

Job Analysis)

Job Analysis

JA2 (Practice of Job

analysis)

Rec

ruit

men

t

KS

A

(K

no

wle

dg

e, S

kil

ls,

Ab

ilit

ies)

Job

Per

form

an

ce

Job

Satisfaction

Job

Retention

Intervening

variable Dependent

variable

Ind

epen

den

t

var

iab

le

0.22

0.22

0.19

-0.078

0.05

-0.069

0.47

0.52

0.23

0.34


26

TEST FOR MODERATING EFFECT OF RECRUITMENT

In order to explore the extent to which Recruitment KSA moderated the job analysis–job performance

relationship, regression analysis was conducted. A moderating effect is present if the multiplicative interaction term

is statistically significant. Using hierarchical regression analysis (SPSS 12 ), the importance of job analysis JA 1 and

Practice of Job Analysis JA 2 were entered in step one, and the Recruitment KSA moderator in step two. Table 5

presents B, SE B , R2 change and standardized beta coefficients. As may be seen from Table 5, all interaction effects

were positive and in the predicted direction.

It may be noted here that, since the coefficients of both the multiplicative interaction terms and the

moderator variables are statistically significant, the moderator should be seen as quasi-moderators rather than pure

moderators. It is also noteworthy from R2 change, that job analysis and the moderating variables together explained

a much larger proportion of the total variance on dependent variable. However, the relatively stable standardized

beta coefficients generated by job analysis with recruitment, indicating its unique impact, independent of

moderators, support the central argument of this study that a job analysis practice is an important HR strategy to

achieve superior job performance results.

Table 5 Moderating effect of recruitment process KSA

Note: All beta values significant at .05 or higher level of significance.

DISCUSSION

This paper discusses the link of an important human resource management (HRM) practice, job analysis,

with the employee job performance by exploring the impact of job analysis on job performance. Role of recruitment

as moderator in this HRM-Performance link has also been examined. A hypothesized model in this connection has

been presented and tested. The result of this study has been derived from the survey of employees of regulatory

authorities of Pakistan and organizations working under the umbrella of these authorities. This makes the

conclusions more sectors oriented. Results indicated that Job analysis, a vital human resource management practice

has a direct impact on employee job performance and its outcomes, viz., job satisfaction and job retention Current

finding is in conformity with previous studies carried out in the western countries (Pfeffer, 1994; 1998; Huselid,

1995) to a non-western country Pakistan.

The specific aim of this research study was to examine the impact of job analysis on employee job

performance with the relation of recruitment process in public sector regulatory authorities of Pakistan. As stated by

McCormick, 1976, Job analysis is generally regarded as a foundation for human resource management and further

studied by Sanchez and Levine, 2000 in human resource management practices such as recruitment and selection,

training and performance appraisal. Inaccurate job analysis affects other human resource activities based on it. Job

analysis as a management technique was developed around 1900 in the west and it became one of the tools by which

managers understood and directed organizations. This important human resource practice however, could not be

kept in practice in Pakistan till 2000 (one hundred years gap)

In the field of human resource management the importance of job analysis cannot be denied, as all

decisions in the employment process rest upon job analysis. Later, Brannick and Levine in 2002 described job

analysis as a systematic process whereby one discovers the nature of a job. This is accomplished by dividing the job

B SE B β R2 Change

Step 1 .039

Constant 3.302 .085

Job Analysis 1 .125 .027 .191

Job Analysis 2 .013 .013 .042

Step 2 .194

Constant 1.148 .195 .089

Job Analysis 1 .058 .025 .084

Job Analysis 2 .026 .011 .453

Recruitment .570 .048 .089


27

into smaller units, where the process results in one or more written products. Some researchers Cascio, 1998; Bowin

and Harvey, 2000 have emphasized the importance of job analysis as a strategic HRM practice with potential

contribution to organizational performance but in the present study, practice of job analysis has been taken into the

account with respect to employee job performance. In fact the impact of job analysis is examines at micro level

whereas organization performance may be seen at macro level. Individual job performance ultimately will leads

toward the organizational performance. Anthony et al., 2002 and Dessler, 2003 further studied that with the growing

identification of the HR–performance linkage, it was recommended that organizations which actively pursue job

analysis as a human resource planning strategy are likely to gain competitive advantage upon the organization which

are not using job analysis.

Despite an increasing detection of the central role of job analysis in all human resource activities, there is

little empirical research that specifically links job analysis to job performance. Drucker (2002) and several other

researchers , Towers, 1992; Pfeffer, 1998; and Greer, 2001 suggested that the success of organizations in the present

competitive environment largely depends upon the caliber of their human resources and innovative employee

management programmes and practices. In Pakistan no such empirical research was available which links job

analysis with job performance. There is enough evidence in the current HR-performance literature to expect a

positive impact of job analysis on job performance.

Certain organizations have benefited from job analysis due to the positive link between job analysis and job

performance in the west. Sherman et al. (1998). claimed „The ultimate purpose of job analysis is to improve

performance and productivity‟ The practice of job analysis has the potential to make this contribution to job

performance both directly and interactively with other key human resource practices. Frequency of job analysis

practice can help an organization in creating a proper infrastructure by defining the tasks to be performed as well as

the timelines for performing them.

Regular job analysis contributes not only to the employees but to the organizational performance by promoting job

attitudes and working environment. In addition, job analysis can be used to identify factors that form employee‟s

motivation and job satisfaction. Timely and accurate information on job tasks and responsibilities as well as level of

performance required to achieve results provides employees with clear direction and definite targets to pace their job

performance efficiently.

This reality is extensively acknowledged that `human resources' is the paramount organizational resource

and the means to accomplish exceptional performance. At a general level, results generated by this study are largely

consistent with results obtained in studies of Job Analysis- job performance conducted in other geographical settings

(Becker and Huselid, 1998). However, results of the present study add to the available empirical evidence and

suggested that such declaration have some credibility. Outcome of the study put forward an indication of the

positive relationship between job analysis and job performance.

Significant positive correlations were found of job analysis 1 (importance of job analysis) with job

performance r=.19, whereas correlation with other variables remained within small effect as with job analysis 2

(practice or frequency of job analysis) r=.06 recruitment r=.22 and job satisfaction r=.22 There was a negative

correlation (-0.043) with job retention only. These results indicates positive relationship of job analysis not only with

the job performance , dependent variable but also with job satisfaction except job retention which clearly indicates

that importance of job analysis has nothing to do with employee job retention. Correlation of importance of job

analysis, JA 1 was found weak with job analysis 2 (practice or frequency of job analysis). This indicates that job

analysis 2 (practice or frequency of job analysis) may be used as moderator between JA 1 and job performance to

ascertain the frequency of the job analysis. Job analysis 2 has also a weak relationship with job performance r=.05

One of the avenue for future research may be the moderator role of the JA2 between JA 1 and Job performance with

or without existing moderator recruitment.

Further analysis of data through regression results shows that job analysis 1 and job analysis 2 correlates

positively with Job performance. R-squared value was found .039 which explained 3.9 percent of the total variance

for dependent variable job performance relating to job analysis, Adjusted R- squared was .036. The adjusted R2

has

given an idea of how well hypothesized model generalizes and ideally its value should be the same, or very close to,


28

the value of R2. So in this study value of adjusted R

2 is close to the value of R

2. B value for job analysis 1 was .125

and .013 for job analysis 2 with standard error of .027 and .013 respectively. p-level of job analysis 1 is .000 and t

value is 4.614 and p-level of job analysis 2 is .309 and t value is 1.017

In multiple regressions the model takes the form of an equation that contains a coefficient (b) for each

predictor and these b values indicate the individual contribution of each predictor to the model. b values also

explains about the relationship between dependent variable and each predictor. Positive value reflects that there is a

positive relationship between the predictor and the outcome whereas a negative coefficient represents a negative

relationship.

Each of b values has an associated standard error indicating to what extent these values would vary across

different samples, and these standard errors are used to determine whether or not the b value differs significantly

from zero. In this study all the values are positive t-test associated with a b value is significant hence predictor job

analysis is making a significant contribution to the model. The smaller the value of Significance .000 and the larger

the value of t = 4.614 is showing the greater contribution of JA1. In JA 2 value of Significance is .309 and the value

of t = 1.017 which is not showing the greater contribution.

Beta value for job analysis 1 was .191 whereas job analysis 2 has shown a value of .042. The standardized

beta values ( β ) tell us the number of standard deviations that the outcome will change as a result of one standard

deviation change in the predictor. The standardized beta values ( β ) are all measured in standard deviation units and

so are directly comparable, therefore, they provide a better insight into the „importance‟ of a predictor in the model.

It is to mention here that regression analysis was carried out by taking in account the value of intercept.

Although impact of job analysis 1 is significant but again poor results have been reflected by the job analysis 2 which

reflects that in public sector organizations job analysis is not being carried out regularly. Job analysis has a vital role

and practice of job analysis is indeed an effective HR strategy to achieve desirable organizational outcomes, such as

greater administrative efficiency, organizational climate, and stronger relative job performance in the organization.

A job analysis approach may be seen as a foundation of competitive advantage in its own right. In fact, public sector

organizations particularly regulatory authorities seem to be more in tune with recent developments in human

resource management, and actively seek and implement result-oriented strategies already tested by larger and

grown-up organizations (Thompson and Strickland, 2001; Dessler, 2003).

The significance of job analysis as an independent predictor is consistent with the emerging view that

regards human resource planning as a prerequisite for high performance in the present highly competitive

organizational culture (Towers, 1992; Greer, 2001). The interaction of HR involvement and job analysis suggests

that, if HR planning is guided by more concrete information on employee‟s strengths and limitations and active

participation of Human Resource professionals in strategic decisions, it is more likely to produce measurable

outcomes. The results mentioned above clearly illustrate the value of strategic role to HR professionals, as

advocated to a great extent of the current HR literature.

Keeping in view the job analysis approach, the current study provides some initial evidence on the value of

the competency-focused approach. As shown by the results, when a competency-based approach which seeks data

on special skills and competencies of employees (Anthony et al., 2002) is converted into an organization-wide

regular job analysis practice, it can certainly provide some additional benefits in the form of higher job performance

results. This interaction of job analysis practice and the approach used to obtain pertinent data indicates the need to

recognize the potential value of modifying the job analysis approaches to incorporate competency factors.

Rapid technological advancements and increasing competitive pressures are making several jobs obsolete.

Thus, organizations must constantly review the skills, knowledge and abilities of their employees and recruitment

strategies to achieve an effective match between job requirements and employee skills (Clifford, 1994; Mondy et al.,

2002).

A realistic approach of Job Analysis ensures maximum congruency between job content and job context

which is supportive for the recruitment process. The flaws in public sector‟s recruitment system occur when they

independently deal with job content and job context. The preference is given to job content as it is taken as a


29

benchmark for organization during recruitment and selection while HRM based recruitment requires interdependent

criteria both for job content and context. The job content and context together determine the functions and

functionality of a job. They are best understood as intermingled growing process rather than a linear progression of

steps. Many organizations therefore carry a job re-design as a component of the ongoing process of Job Analysis.

An effective Job analysis can be conducted after the job has been designed, the employees have been trained and the

work has been performed.

It has been observed that in public sector, if job is analysed after the job is assigned and continues with

certain practices for a long period of time while HR best practices gives an extensive picture of different extensions

of Job Analysis. Cherrington (1995) identifies three occasions when Job Analysis is normally carried out: first, when

the organization commences, secondly, when a new job is created, and third when a job is changed significantly as a

result of new methods new procedures and new technology. If third point is particularly considered it needs

recruitment on the basis of constantly changing knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA) needs as new procedures or

technology requires potential employees to handle them effectively. The results of the present study support the role

of Job analysis for both increasing individual job performance and reducing intentions to leave the organization.

Individuals with higher levels of knowledge, skills and abilities (KSA) tend to be better job performers.

Extensive job analysis should be conducted on each job to identify the major job tasks that comprise the position.

Jobs will also need to be analyzed for the nature of the job performed, the nature of the relationships encountered in

the job, and job outcomes in terms of what is formed as a result of performing the job.

Human resource professionals play a vital role in the recruitment process because they have to

communicate information about the job in the form of job description and job specification which are based on the

job analysis. Source of information about the job influences like person–job fit and subsequent attraction (Rynes,

Bretz, & Gerhart, 1991) and retention (Barrick & Zimmerman, 2005). The basic assumption is that accurate and

realistic job information enables applicants to assess the degree of similarity between their knowledge, skills and

abilities (KSA) and the job requirements (Breaugh, 1992; Breaugh & Starke, 2000; Wanous, 1977, 1992).

Organizations can endeavor to increase level of performance by matching job insight (job description and job

specifications) with person insight (Skill, knowledge and abilities).

Organizations can choose to assess self insight during the pre-hire phase of the employment relationship

using recruitment and selection processes. Self insight can also be assessed and developed in current employees in

the post-hire phase of employment using career planning and progression activities as well as job design activities.

In the present study positive correlations of recruitment was found with job performance r=.47 but low relations were

reported with the job retention r=.08 Correlation between recruitment and job satisfaction was also found low r=.19

According to Meglino, Ravlin, & De Nisi, 2000; Phillips, 1998 accurate job description during recruitment

and selection is associated with positive job performance outcomes like job satisfaction and low turnover. Results

supports for job performance but job satisfaction and job retention have not fully supported. Applicants who

perceive a fit between their KSA and the job requirements are likely to remain in the selection process and accept a

job offer.

Moderator role of recruitment was tested in the model in between job analysis and job performance. R2

change value in job analysis 1(JA 1) and job analysis 2 (JA 2) in step 2 was .19, job satisfaction .14 and Job

retention .20 which indicates that inclusion of recruitment helps in explaining the additional 19 % variance in the job

performance. Before inclusion of recruitment, JA 1 and JA 2 accounted for .039 or 4 %, job satisfaction accounted

for .268 or 26.8 % and job retention accounted for .053 or 5.3 % variance (R2 value ) in job performance.

When organizations with well developed, recruitment and selection process pursue job analysis as an

organization policy, they gain a level of superiority in human resource management and application of HR practices

that other organizations lacking such resources can hardly match. On examining the complete model R2 change

value in Job Analysis 1, Job Analysis 2, job satisfaction and job retention step 2 is .101 This indicates that inclusion

of recruitment KSA helps in explaining the additional 10.1 % variance in the job performance. The p- value for

testing significance of correspond F change is .000 this means that inclusion of recruitment KSA significantly

improves model to predict job performance.


30

According to McConnell, 2003 job performance is defined as an action that can be observed and measured.

Several variables influence job performance including age (Wright& Bonett, 2002), non-financial rewards like

recognition of achievement (Cronin & Becherer, 1999; Fort & Voltero, 2004) and job satisfaction (McConnell,

2003; Tzeng, 2004) All these variables would positively influence employee job performance. In the present study

job performance was found highly significant correlated with the job satisfaction (r=.52) which support the wok of

McConnell, 2003 and Tzeng, 2004.

Core competencies are typically derived using various job analysis methods within the organizational

psychology literature (Visser et al. 1997), Job analysis methods are systematic procedures widely used within

organizations to identify the critical aspects of a job and what knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics

are required to perform the job successfully. The positive correlations of job analysis 1( importance of job analysis)

with job performance r=.19 was found showing within small effect size whereas correlations of job analysis 2

(practice of job analysis) with job performance was r=.05 showing low effect size. This indicates organizations

although recognize the importance of job analysis but practice of job analysis is not a regular activity, productivity

of such organizations may be low.

The professional human resource literature is currently dedicated to measure and reporting upon, the

measurable link between an organization‟s human resource management (HRM) practices and its performance ( P )

– referred as the HRM-P link. The government too is interested in this link (Kingsmill, 2003). The model presented

in this study is based on HRM-P link where performance ( P ) is related with the employee job performance. The

question of how HRM policies and practices are linked to organizational performance has been a subject of great

interest to both academics and practitioners (Wright et al., 1999). However, linking HRM practices to employee job

performance is unexplored and required a great attention particularly in the context of public sector organizations.

However, some researchers have moved a step forward by stressing the importance of job analysis as a strategic

HRM practice with potential contribution to organizational performance (Cascio, 1998; Bowin and Harvey, 2001).

With increasing recognition of the HR–performance linkage, it has been suggested that organizations that actively

pursue job analysis as a Human Resource Planning (HRP) strategy are likely to gain competitive advantage

(Anthony et al., 2002; Dessler, 2003).

Based on previous human resource research, it was hypothesized that a critical human resource practices job

analysis, recruitment as a moderator, job satisfaction and job retention would be positively related to job

performance. Findings revealed that importance placed on each of these human resource issues were all areas in

which job performance was based. These findings suggest that these human resource activities do in fact have a

positive impact on job performance.

Based on the literature and regression results for the hypothesized model for this study a positive

correlations of the variables job analysis 1, job analysis 2 and job satisfaction with Job performance has been shown.

Job retention shown a negative correlation in the model only. R-squared value was found .434 which explained 43.4

percent of the total variance for dependent variable job performance relating to job analysis 1 and job analysis 2 job

satisfaction and job retention.

Adjusted R- squared was .426 which is near the value of R2. B value for job analysis 1, (.044) job analysis

2,( .002) , job satisfaction (.155) and job retention ( -.006) with standard error of .002, .010, .052 and .040 . p-level

of job analysis 1, (.043) job analysis 2,( .864) job satisfaction (.003) and job retention ( .097) with t value of 2.032,

.172, 2.967, and -1.663

All the values were positive t value except job retention with „b‟ value hence predictor job analysis 1, job

analysis 2, job satisfaction are making a significant contribution to the model.

Beta value for job analysis 1, (.067) job analysis 2,( .006) job satisfaction (.135) and job retention ( -.061)

provided a better insight into the importance of job analysis 1, job analysis 2 and job satisfaction in the model.

This study has examined the feasibility of using job analysis method to develop job performance measures

for public sector regulatory authorities employees and investigated aspects of the reliability and validity of the job

performance measures produced in the study. An important finding of the study is that adaptations of job analysis


31

method can be used with non-professionals as well as professionals to develop job performance measures.

Furthermore, these job performance measures were adopted to face validity and to be easy to complete. All six

performance measures demonstrated adequate internal reliability and test reliability. There were some core

competencies identified across the six job performance measures, such as reliability, flexibility and honesty.

Currently employee performance is being judged through performance appraisal system in public sector

regulatory authorities which influences the competence of employees. Their technical skill is evaluated in the

appraisal process through the results attained on job. If appraisal is just to make sure that organization objectives are

met, it may not add to organizational commitment. There is no employee participation in the appraisal process which

may lead to unfairness and injustice. Performance appraisal is an opportunity for both the organization and the

individual employee to review his current level of skills; knowledge and abilities identify the gaps and take

necessary steps to enhance the competence. Performance appraisal, which is linked to the rewards and other

benefits, motivates the employee to update his knowledge and skills (Latham and Wexley, 1981). The appraisal

system that balances the growth interests of both the employees and organization can result in higher productivity

which might result in achieving organizational goals.

Here in this study the job performance is measured by means of on the job enhancement of performance,

achievement of organizational objectives, consistency with the goals of organization, financial and non-financial

rewards and objectivity of the performance evaluation system. It is an open secret that in Pakistan no empirical work

has been done so far in the area of human resource management particularly in this area of research, therefore it is

an important and distinctive feature of this study.

To sum up, the model, originating from HR practices job analysis 1, job analysis 2 to job satisfaction and

job retention all HR practice influences job performance through recruitment KSA, moderating variable. This calls

for an integrated approach to linking HR practice like job analysis with employee job performance. Mere focus on

direct HR–performance linkage may not reveal the mechanism through which HRM system operates. It calls forth a

wider vision to see the big picture and the interdependence and interrelationship among HRM practices, intervening

variables and dependant variable. Organizations that conducted job analysis on a regular basis (once every year or

every two years showed better results on the measures of job performance. Eighty eight per cent of the respondents

have shown the importance of the job analysis and 70 percent organizations in the public sector pursued job analysis

practice.

The study also shows a relationship between the variables mentioned above amongst the selected

regulatory authorities (NEPRA, OGRA, PTA, PEMRA, STATE BANK & SECP). This result indicated that Job

analysis 1 ( importance of job analysis )has a positive relationship with job performance in all regulatory authorities

except in OGRA where it has a negative relationship. Job analysis 2 (practice / frequency of job analysis ) has

shown, however, negative relationship with the job performance in OGRA, PTA,PEMRA and SECP whereas

NEPRA and STATA BANK have shown a positive relationship. Negative relationship is due to irregular conduction

of the job analysis in these authorities.

CONCLUSION

The linkage process will enable the HR community to design programmes that will bring forth better

operational results to attain higher performance and productivity. The focus of the HR management should be to

understand employees job performance process and design HR practices that influence process and outcome

variables. The study has found that, even if a HR practice does not show positive connection, it can significantly

influence performance outcomes indirectly. Hence it would be a great mistake to rely only on those practices that

have direct link with operational and financial performance. The model might provide enough insights for HR

professionals to link their activities with the job performance paradigm.

The foregoing analysis reveals varied aspects of in practical operation of human resource management in

Pakistan. It shows that human resource planning, the most crucial component of personnel function, is emerging.

The task of acquiring sound and credible employees belongs to the Human Resources Management. Since, HRM is

a known field under the concept of Management, it is expected that several theories, models and tools have been


32

developed to promote its manifestations. Among these theories one is Job analysis, which is a systematic study of a

job to identify its major components. The job analysis process generally involves observing the job being performed;

asking job incumbents and supervisors questions about the job, tasks, working conditions and KSAOs ( Knowledge,

skills, abilities and others); examining the outcomes of the job; and reviewing relevant literature about the job. This

important aspect of human resource management was being ignored particularly in public sector jobs. Job analysis

paves the way for unassailable recruitment process, instead of using traditional methods; the Public Sector has to

consider the possibility of employing Job analysis as the primary recruitment tool.

The results of this study advance the field of HRM by empirically showing a link between job analysis and

job performance. The strong impact of job analysis on job performance suggests that job analysis is indeed a

cornerstone of HR activities and a vital strategic management practice to gain competitive advantage. The

significance of the unique effect of job analysis on job performance measures, as revealed by different statistical

models used in the study, is particularly noteworthy. On the whole, this research endeavour suggests a substantial

positive contribution by job analysis to job performance.

In general, the findings of this study are consistent with studies conducted in Western countries on the

contribution of HR function to job performance. Thus, the value of present study lies in the fact that it offers a

much-needed cross-cultural validation of theoretical models built on the basis of studies of Western organizations.

The present study supports the current efforts seeking to establish HR–performance linkage by way of developing a

specific conceptual model to illustrate the process by which the practice of job analysis and performance might be

related, and by testing it with empirical data from a non-Western setting. It must be emphasized that the possibility

of job analysis–performance linkage has not been extensively explored in the South-Asian context.

LIMITATIONS

The present study may be seen as a preliminary attempt to establish the importance of job analysis as a HR

management practice. Its findings must be assessed with at least three limitations in mind. First, the study has made

an extensive use of self-reported measures of key variables, which are often seen as less desirable than objective

measures. While most of the measures developed in the study involved clear and fairly direct indicators, we were

constrained in our efforts to obtain more objective information on all variables. The strong relationship between

objective and subjective measures as revealed by this study and the previous research, however, should not make us

complacent in our search for best possible measures.

Second, the present study examined only a selected number of independent, dependant and moderating

variables. This means that theoretical formulation of the process by which job analysis influences job performance is

far from being exhaustive. Finally, the present study used a relatively small sample, which did not allow to pursue

sub-group organisation of organisations in terms of differences in line of business or other similar classifications.

Thus, the findings of the present study may be seen as preliminary in nature, and are intended to stimulate further

research interest in the job analysis– performance relationship as conceptualized here.

SCOPE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

The strengths and limitations of the present study can serve as a useful guide for future research efforts.

One avenue for future research would be to expand the current model with other HR relevant independent variables

such as job design, job evaluation, job security and job succession planning .Empirical investigations of the

interaction effects of such HR practices, in particular, will help further elaborate the process by which job analysis

contributes to job performance. Another avenue for future research would be to develop and examine the research

hypotheses with a case-study and longitudinal designs. The present study may serve as an impetus for HR

professionals and practitioners alike to undertake such studies.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Muhammad Safdar Rehman is a seasoned Human Resource Professional and member of IPMA-Canada with

practical experience of over 20 years in Public Sector Organization, Regulatory authorities and Research &

Development organization. Having solid understanding of a diverse range of Office Management applications


33

including, Human Resources Management, Recruitment and Selection, HR Policies, Training and Development,

Performance Appraisal, Compensation and Project Management. Author has acquired a Master degree in Business

Administration from International Islamic University, Pakistan and Professional Diploma in Human Resource

Management from NUST. At present his PhD thesis in Management Sciences from National University of Modern

Languages, Islamabad is under submission.

Dr. Hamid Rafiq Khattak, PhD, is Dean, APCOM and visiting Faculty member, National University of Modern

Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author has a vast experience in the area of Human Resource Development.

Dr. Ajmal Waheed, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Administrative Sciences, Quaid-e- Azam

University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

REFERENCES

1. Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1996) „Affective, Continuance and normative commitment and turnover‟,

Academy of Management Journal, 37: 670–87.

2. Anderson, N. (2003). Applicant and recruiter reactions to new technology in selection: A critical review

and agenda for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, (12), 121–136.

3. Angle, H. (1983) „Organizational Commitment: Individual and Organizational Influences‟, Sociology of

Work and Occupations, 10: 123–46.

4. Anthony, W.P., Kacmar, K.M., & Perrewe, P.L. (2002). Human Resource Management: A Strategic

approach

5. Arthur, J.B. (1994) „Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover‟,

Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670–87.

6. Ash, R.A. & Levine, E. (1980). A Framework for Evaluating Job Analysis Methods‟ Personnel,

November–December: 53–9.

7. Barney, J. (1991) „Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage‟, Journal of Management, 17:

99–120.

8. Barney, J.B. and Wright, P.M. (1997) „On Becoming A Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resources in

Gaining Competitive Advantage‟, Working Paper.

9. Becker, H.S. (1960) „Notes on the Concept of Commitment‟, American Journal of Sociology, 66: 32–42.

10. Becker, B. and Gerhart, B. (1996) „The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational

Performance: Progress and Prospects‟, Academy of Management Journal, 39: 779–801.

11. Becker, B.E., Huselid, M.A., Pickus, P.S. and Spratt, M.F. (1997) „HR as a Source of Shareholder Value:

Research and Recommendations‟, Human Resource Management, 36: 39–47.

12. Becker, B.E. and Huselid, M.A. (1998) „High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: A

Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications‟, Research in Personnel and Human Resources

Management, 16: 53–101.

13. Beer, K., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. and Walton, R. (1984) Managing Human Assets. New York:

Macmillan.

14. Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D. and Walton, R. (1985) Human Resources Management: A

General Manager’s Perspective. New York: The Free Press.

15. Bemis, S.E., Belenky, A.H., & Sodner, D.A.(1983) Job Analysis: An Effective Management Tool,

Washington, DC: BNA Books.

16. Boudreau, J.W. (1998) „Strategic Human Resource Management Measures: Key Linkages and the People

Vantage Model‟, Working Paper, 28, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University.

17. Brooks, F.P. Jr (1987) „No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering‟, IEEE

Computer, 20: 10–19.

18. Butler, S. K., & Harvey, R. J. (1988). A comparison of holistic versus decomposed rating of Position

Analysis Questionnaire work dimensions. Personnel Psychology, ( 41), 761–771.

19. Cascio, Wayne. F. (1995) Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits.

McGraw-Hill, Inc.

20. Cascio,W.F.(1998) Managing Human Resources. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

21. Cherrington, D. (1995).The Management of Human Resources, 4th

ed, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.


34

22. Cornelius, E., Carron, T. & Collins, M. (1979) „Job Analysis Models and Job Classifications‟, Personnel

Psychology, (22) ,693–708.

23. C.M.Siddique (2004) Job analysis: a strategic human resource management practice. Int. Journal of Human

Resource Management, 15(1), 219-244

24. Curtis, B., Hefley, W.E. and Miller, S. (1995) People Capability Maturity Model. Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh

Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

25. Dessler, G. (2003) Human Resource Management, 9th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

26. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. and Boudreau, M. (2000) „Structural Equation Modeling and Regression:

Guidelines for Research Practice‟, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4: Article

7.

27. Guest, D. (1997) „Human Resource Management and Performance: A Review and Research Agenda‟,

International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 263–76.

28. Greer, C.R. (2001). Strategic Human Resource Management: A General Managerial Approach, 2nd ed.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

29. Horngren, C.T., Foster, G. and Datar, S.M. (2000) Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. New Delhi:

Prentice-Hall.

30. Huselid, M.A. (1994). Documenting HR‟s Effect on Company Performance. HR Magazine, (39), 79–85.

31. Huselid, M.A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity,

and Corporate Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal, (38), 635–72.

32. Iaffaldano, M. R., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.

Psychological Bulletin, (97), 251–273.

33. Igbaria, M. and Greenhaus, J.H. (1992) „Determinants of MIS employees‟ Turnover intentions: A

Structural Equation Model‟, Communication of the ACM, 35: 35–49.

34. Jackson, S.E., Schuler, R. and Rivero, J.C. (1989) „Organizational characteristics as predictors of personnel

practices‟, Personnel Psychology, 42: 727–86.

35. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction job performance

relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, (127), 376–407.

36. Lado, A.A. and Wilson, M.C. (1994) „Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A

Competency-Based Perspective‟, Academy of Management Review, 19: 699–727.

37. Latham, G.P. and Wexley, K.N. (1981) Increasing Productivity through performance appraisal. MA:

Addison-Wesley.

38. Lengnick-Hall, M. and Lengnick-Hall, C.A. (1999) „Expanding Customer Orientation in the HR Function‟,

Human Resource Management, 38: 201–14.

39. Levine, E. L., Sistrunk, F., McNutt, K. J., & Gael, S. (1988). Exemplary job analysis systems in selected

organizations: A description of processes and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology,(3) 3–21.

40. Mottaz, C.J. (1988) „Determinants of Organizational Commitment‟, Human Relations, 41: 467–82.

41. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R. and Porter, C. (1979) „The Measurement of Organizational Commitment‟,

Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14: 224–7.

42. Mottaz, C.J. (1988) „Determinants of Organizational Commitment‟, Human Relations, 41: 467–82.

43. Mowday, R.T. (1998) „Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment‟, Human

Resource Management Review, 4: 387–401.

44. McCormick, E. J., Denisi, A. S. & Shaw, J. B. (1979). Use of the Position Analysis Questionnaire for

establishing the job component validity of tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, (64) 51-56.

45. Organ, D. W. (1988). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of Management,

(14), 547–557.

46. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The Human Equation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

47. Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive Advantage through People. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

48. Richardson, R. and Thompson, M. (1999) The Impact of People Management Practices on Business

Performance: A Literature Review. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

49. Sandberg, J. (2000) „Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach‟, Academy

of Management Journal, 43: 9–25.

50. Schuler, R.S. & Jackson, S.E. (1996) Human Resource Management: Positioning for the 21st Century, 6th

ed. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.


35

51. Sivasubramanyam, N. and Venkataratnam, C.S. (1998) „The Relationship between Human Resource

Management and Firm Performance: The Indian Experience‟, Paradigm, 1: 135–41.

52. Snell, S.A. and Dean, J.W. Jr (1992) „Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A

Human Capital Perspective‟, Academy of Management Journal, 35: 467–504.

53. Steers, R.M. (1977) „Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment‟, Administrative Science

Quarterly, 22: 46–56.

54. Thompson, A.A., & Strickland, A.J. (2001). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 12th ed. Boston,

MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

55. Truss, C. (2001) „Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes‟,

Journal of Management Studies, 38(8): 1121–49.

56. Ulrich, D. (1997) „Measuring Human Resources: An Overview of Practice and a Prescription for Results‟,

Human Resources Management, 36: 303–20.

57. Wright, P.M., McMahan, G.C., McCormick, B. and Sherman, W.S. (1998) „Strategy, Core Competence,

and HR Involvement as Determinants of HR Effectiveness and Refinery Performance‟, Human Resource

Management, 37: 17–29.

58. Wright, P M., Mcgormick, B., Sherman, W. & Mcmahan, G. (1999). The role of human resource practices

in petro-chemical refinery performance'. International Journal of Human Resource Management,

10(4)551-71

59. Wynekoop, J.L. and Walz, D.B. (2000) „Investigating traits of top performing software developers‟,

Information Technology & People, 13(3): 186–95.


36

APPENDIX 1

Exploratory Factor Analysis Results of Variables Items

Items Factors

1 2 3 4

Importance of JA to conduct .291 -.181 -.178 .159

Frequency of JA .076 .223 -.473 .040

Job demands and level of eligibility matched with advertisement .534 -.292 -.046 .055

Functions match the job position .517 -.280 .055 .128

I believe that I have enough knowledge about the job .340 -.568 .170 -.038

I have abilities for the current duties .344 -.614 .237 .286

I have mastery of the specific skills needed to perform the tasks related

to my present job .382 -.589 .177 .249

Present job gives me the opportunity to enhance my performance on job .671 -.180 -.225 -.225

Present job has a direct impact on organizational objectives .527 -.331 -.048 -.423

My job performance are consistent with goals of org. .518 -.463 .058 -.298

My good performance is rewarded financial terms .596 .079 -.032 -.402

My good job performance is appreciated by higher ups .644 .136 -.095 -.293

The job performance evaluation system is objective .619 .103 .056 .155

My present job gives inner satisfaction .527 .396 -.152 .627

I am respected because of my job .453 .116 -.067 .462

My job gives me a sense of fulfillment .350 .297 -.172 .550

I can seek my peers help regarding my job .289 .196 .116 .495

I will recommend this job to a friend if it is advertised .380 .251 -.197 .582

I feel cared for by my organization .431 .300 -.011 .571

I will continue in my job even paid less .371 .303 .399 -.373

Had my job met my expectations I would have given it my best .331 .071 .525 .306

I like my job because it totally monotonous in nature .364 .475 .476 -.093

I joined this job because I had no other options .049 .356 .648 -.114

I can consider changing my job in the next 12 months -.122 -.003 .502 -.081

I like to reach my superannuation in my present organization -.015 .343 .457 .101

Eigenvalues

Percentage of Variance explained

Cumulative percentage of variance explained

5.378

21.512

21.512

2.701

10.806

32.317

1.775

7.098

39.416

1.360

5.440

44.85

Note:

a. N= 568

b. Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization.

b. Factor 1 = Job Performance Factor 2 = Recruitment KSA Factor 3 = Job Retention Factor 4 = Job Satisfaction

Documents

Impact Of Job Analysis on job performance