Upload
anonymous-13ulunpz
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
hju
Citation preview
Home | About Us | Feedback
Friday: 10.30 pm, Saturday: 11.30 am
Sunday: 9:30am & 11.00pm
Tweet 0
Impact Of CBDTs FPI Circular
Published on Mon, Jan 27,2014 | 20:58, Updated at Tue, Jan 28 at 13:51Source : Moneycontrol.com
Heres some great news for all foreign portfolio investors! The
CBDT has finally provided clarity on how investments by FIIs
and QFIs- categories that constitute Indias new Foreign
Portfolio Investment regime- will be taxed. Just this month,
SEBI notified its FPI regulations; repealed its extant FII
regulations and left it up to the tax department to clarify the
modalities of taxation. The tax department has now clarified
that the tax procedures for FPIs will be similar to that for FIIs.
That brings in clarity not just for FIIs who will now have to
migrate to the FPI regime but also for Qualified Foreign
Investors or QFIs- an investor category that was introduced last year but did not take off as it
placed onerous requirements of withholding on Qualified Depository Participants. Heres Tax
consultant Ameet Patel on the impact of CBDTs Circular
Ameet Patel, Partner, Sudit K Parekh & Co.
As you are aware, SEBI had been very proactive in setting up a committee and verbatim
accepting the committee report and forwarding it to the government to implement it. While
SEBI was proactive, the problems that were faced were with reference to taxation because
everyone felt that unless necessary notification was issued or necessary amendments were
passed in the Income Tax Act, the FPI scheme would not really kick off & as we saw - based
on the experience of the QFI scheme- the tax related issues really bogged down that scheme.
So when the FPI regulations were notified by SEBI, everyone was awaiting the necessary
amendments or clarifications on the income tax side. As you are aware, the IT Act refers to the
term FII and in the last budget we had a couple of amendments whereby the concept of QFI
was brought into the IT Act. So the IT Act was nowhere talking about FPI & therefore it was
obviously the expectation that the Act would be amended so as to bring clarity on FPIs.
Now with this notification that seems to have been issued by the CBDT, it appears that the
notification talks about Section 115AD of the IT Act. This Section refers to the taxation of FIIs &
in that the term FII is defined to be 'any foreign investor as may be notified by the Government
from time to time' and using those powers vested in the government, under the particular
Section, the new notification seems to have been issued. And the notification says that for the
purpose of Section 115AD, the term FII would mean or include FPIs and therefore all the tax
related Sections or provisions in the IT Act applicable to an FII would going forward apply to an
FPI. Clearly this notification is aimed at allaying all the fears that the foreign investors and the
custodian industry had on the taxation front on FPIs and hopefully we should now see the
foreign investors getting more confidence and all those investors who had held back their
applications hopefully would now go forward with their plans of entering India in the context of
investment in Indian securities.
As you are aware, in the context of QFIs, the biggest stumbling block was the provision
whereby QDPs were required to take care of withholding tax provisions and they were forced
to ensure that anytime money is going into the bank account of a QFI, the QDP was to ensure
that tax was deducted and paid to the government. In the context of FII, that requirement was
not there. Most of the income of the FIIs is either exempt or is deducted by someone else.
Since the regulations relating to FPI- on taxation- are identical to the ones relating to FII, I feel
that the QDPs or the DDPs - the custodians basically- they would certainly heave a sigh of
relief and they would no longer be required to take care of the withholding tax provisions.
The only thing that is a curious point is that in the operational guidelines for DDPs, issued by
SEBI, para 6 mentions that the DDP will need to set in place a mechanism to ensure that tax
is deducted and paid over from any payments made to the FPIs and of course at that place
SC relied on ratio of Mitsubishi that filing of
return doesnt attracts bar on advance ruling;
set aside two orders fb.me/YaCCQ2Ph
Retweeted by the firm
taxmann publications
@taxmannindia
Expand
>@OECD releases draft of revised guidance
Transfer Pricing
@ArmsLengthTP
30 Jan
22h
Tweets Follow
Tweet to @thefirmupdate
More Stories
CBEC Clarifies Fiat Judgment Applic ...
Challenges Faced By The Big 4!
More Power To CAG!
FPI Regime: Tax Hurdles?
Davos 2014: PwC Global CEO Survey
RBI On Call & Put Options
Arvind Datar On Corporate Fraud
Kanga & Palkhivala 2014
UBs Unsecured Creditors: Happy H ...
Call/Put Options Pricing: Hazy Futu ...
Find us on Facebook
The Firm CNBC TV18
5,057 people like The Firm CNBC TV18.
Facebook social plugin
Like
Share 4
Type your message here
they mentioned that as maybe prescribed by the CBDT or the IT Department or the Finance
Ministry from time to time. So there was a reference again to the withholding tax provisions
and not to the advance tax mechanism which is what is now in place in light of the latest
notification.
Rate this article
Rating : 7.00 out of 7 votes cast
Comments
Have an opinion on this news? Post your comment here.
Copyright e-Eighteen.com Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium withoutexpress written permission of moneycontrol.com is prohibited.