27
DAVID WOLFGANG, VMD, MPH DABVP-DAIRY DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ANIMAL HEALTH AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and Influence on Resistance Controversy www.nourishlife.org Get Smart PSU Nov. 15, 2016

Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

DAVID WOLFGANG, VMD, MPH DABVP-DAIRYDIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ANIMAL HEALTH AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICESPENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

ImpactofAntibioticUseinAnimalAgricultureandInfluenceonResistanceControversy

www.nourishlife.org

GetSmartPSUNov.15,2016

Page 2: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Presentation Outline• AnimalCareandTherapeutics• Preventativecarevs.diseasetreatment• Quality concerns• Regulatory issues & food safety concerns–What does that mean for producers–What does that mean for consumers–Whatdoesitmeanforanimalwell-being– Impact for markets and environment

Page 3: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

TimeMagazine,March19,2014p.20

Page 4: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

TheWorriedWell

ReviewAntibioticResistance,2014

Page 5: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

AllAnimalAgSpecies- CareandWell-beingInitiatives

• Addressinjuredorillanimals– Treatmentprotocols

• Painfulconditions• Chronicconditionsandeuthanasia• Relativeeconomicvalueanimals• Routinecareproceduresofcaretakers(+training)• Careandwelfareofanimalsduringtransportation• Prevention&keepwell>treatwhenill

Page 6: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Animaluseandcontributiontoresistance?• Animalsconsumeandexcreteantibiotics(~2trillionlbsofmanuregeneratedinUSAannually)

• Animalscantransmitresistantbacteriainfood– Foodofanimaloriginascauseoffood-borneinfections:• Salmonella• Campylobacter• Yersinia• EColi0157-H7

• Transfertohumanspecificorganisms(esp.seeninexamplesfrompigsandchickenswhensick).

Page 7: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

AntibioticbyRouteofUse• ANTIMICROBIALDRUGSAPPROVEDFORUSEINFOOD-PRODUCINGANIMALS1• ACTIVELYMARKETEDIN2014• DOMESTICSALESANDDISTRIBUTIONDATA• REPORTEDBYMEDICALIMPORTANCEANDROUTEOFADMINISTRATION

AnnualTotals(kg)%Subtotal%GrandTotal• MedicallyImportant Feed1 6,977,747 74% 45%• MedicallyImportant Injection1 341,790 4% 2%• MedicallyImportant3 Intramammary 11,450 <1% <1%• MedicallyImportant Oral5orTopical1 104,082 1% <1%• MedicallyImportant Water6 2,040,920 22% 13%• MedicallyImportant Subtotal 9,475,989 100% 62%• NotMedicallyImportant4AllRoutes7 5,882,221 38%

• GrandTotal 15,358,210 100%

NARMS2014,p44

Page 8: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Whyuseantibioticsinfeed?• Useatperiodsofhigherstress:feedchanges,transportation,weatherchanges

• Reducessheddingoffoodsafetypathogens– Trade1/53,000,000illnessduetoresistance– Vs.1/32,900illnessduetogreaterfoodsafetyillness(additional6,000severecases/yr)

• Lowercarbonfootprint– Average13%greatergain/kgoffeed– Saves4-6%ofinputcost CoxandRicci,Envir Sci,2007

Matthew,etal.,FoodPathDis 2007

Page 9: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

• Acutelyillanimals• Manyfeweranimals• Higherdoses(gmvs.mg)• Morehandling• Tissueresidue• Newproducts&costR&D• Treatpainandsuffering• Stuntedgrowth• Highercost/animal

• Keephealthyvs.sick• Entireherdorflock• Lowdose,noresidue• Fewerfoodpathogens• Olderproducts,notnormallyforhumans

• Avoidpreventpain/suffering

• Lowerscostofproduction• Improvesefficiency(lessmanure,lessacres)

AntibioticsTherapeutic vs.DiseasePrevention/control

Page 10: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

http://www.nppc.org/issues/animal-health-safety/antimicrobials-antibiotics/

Page 11: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

ReductionofResiduesandResistance• Judicioususeprograms• Restrictextralabeluse– Diagnosticstoinformsciencebasedprotocols– Createwrittenprotocolsforcommonconditions– UptodateandwrittenVCPRandVFD

• Superviseuseasmuchaspossibleonfarms• Extendedwithdrawaltimes– Physiologicalstateofanimal– Dose,depotandtissuelocation

• FARAD(www.farad.org)

Page 12: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Factorsthatcanaffecteliminationoftherapeuticproduct

• Doseandsizeofdepo– Rateofabsorption– IV<IM<SQ(productmovesdepotoplasma)– Pharmokenetics

• Overallhealthandstatusofanimal• Targetpluseliminationorgans• Specialcharacteristicsofproduct

–Multipledosesordifferentdoses– Doseindifferentsitethandesigned

Page 13: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

ExtendedWDT• WDTisthetimerequiredafterdosingfortissueconcentrationstobedepletedtoorbelowspecificsafeconcentration

• Morecloselyassociatedtotissuedepotsvs.plasmadepots

• TissuewiththeslowestdepletiondeterminestheWDTforthespecies– 10t½=99.9%depletion,daysusuallyroundedup(nofractionsofdays),physiologicalstate,differenttissue

– InUSsafeconcentrationcanbedefinedasthetolerancelimit-lawiszerofornotapprovedcompounds

• InEuropeusuallytermedMaximumresiduelevel

Page 14: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

NormalDoseNormalKidney/Liver~Predictable

Withdrawal

Safewithdraw

al

MIC

Re-treat~1daysSingledose~10wdMultipledoses- safe~+fewd

• Samedosebutrepeated• Withdrawal(slightlyextended)• (e.g.,fewdplusnewdose)

• Milkwithholding• Prettypredictableevenif1ppb

Page 15: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

ExtendedTreatmentorCompromisedKidney/Liver

VeryLongWithdrawal

Safewithdraw

al

MIC

Re-treat~3daysSafe~30dSafe~50+d

• Samedosebutrepeated• Withdrawal(canbegreatly

extended)• (e.g.,notjust3dplusnew

dose)• Milkwithholding

• Verylongiftargetis1ppb

Page 16: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

MalariaResistanceandLessonsLearned• ReadandHuijben,Evol.App.,2009Fallacies• Drugswithlonghalflivesarepreferable• Denovoresistancemutationsaremainenemy– (vs.transportationaroundglobe)

• Genetictradeoffsalonedeterminecostsofresistancetopathogen– (vs.inhostecology)

• Fixationofresistanceisinevitableifdrugpressureismaintained

Page 17: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Staphylococcusaureus• SamplessubmittedtoADLformastitisorbulktankmilk

culture(2008,2013,2014,2015)examinedforS.aureus

• S.aureusisolates

– 163isolates(n=115QMS;n=48BTM)from77farms• Smallcellvariantphenotypeanalysis• Antibioticresistance

– Amoxicillin+Clavulanicacid,Cefoxitin,Ciprofloxacin,Clindamycin,Erythromycin,Gentamicin,Oxacillin,Tetracycline,Vancomycin,Penicillin.

• Enterotoxingenes:A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,O,P,Q,R,TSST-1• Leukocidingenes:LukAB,LukED,LukMF• DNAFingerprinting:MultiLocusSequenceTyping

Jayarao,unpublished2015

Page 18: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

AntimicrobialResistance

AntibioticResistanceProfile No ofIsolates No. ofFarms

None 130 74

Clindamycin 1 1(QMS)

Cefoxitin 32(BTM)1(QMS)

Penicillin 71(BTM)6(QMS)

Tetracycline 5 5(QMS)

Vancomycin 11

2(BTM)3(QMS)2(BTM)

3Amoxicillin, Penicillin 1 1(BTM)Clindamycin,Erythromycin 2 1(QMS)Oxacillin, Penicillin 1 1(QMS)

Clindamycin,Erythromycin,Tetracycline,Penicillin 2 2(BTM,QMS)

• Sensitivity– 130/163=80%ofisolatessensitivetoalltenantimicrobialsexamined.– BTM:37/48=77%– QMS:93/115=81%NOMRSAstrainisolatedfromPennsylvaniadairyherds

Jayarao,unpublished2015

Page 19: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

PrevalenceofAntibioticResistance%Antibiotic Salmonella E coli‘07 Salmonella Ecoli‘08 Salmonella Ecoli‘09

n=202 n=525 n=232 n=500 n=117 n=510

Amikacin 0 0 0 0 0 0

Amoxi/clav. 1.0 1.5 0 1.1 0 0.6

Ampicillin 1.5 2.1 0 2.2 0 1.6

Cefoxitin 1.0 1.5 0 1.3 0 0.4

Ceftiofur 1.0 0.8 0 1.1 0 0Chloramphenicol 1.0 0.2 0 0.9 0 0.4

Kanamycin 0 3.8 0 4.8 1.7 3.3Streptomycin 1.0 5.1 0.4 6.5 1.7 2.8Sulfizoxazole 1.0 3.8 0 4.8 1.7 2.8

Tetracycline 1.0 13.1 0 9.8 1.7 7.8Trim./sulfa 0 1.0 0 1.5 0 1.2

Schukken,etal,USDA/RDQMAPilotProject

Page 20: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

ResistantE.coli isolatesfromVariousCattleGroupsinPA

AntimicrobialAgents

FarmPrevalence(%)Pre-weanedcalves(n=77)

Post-weanedcalves(n=75)

Drycows(n=72)

Lact.cow(n=80)

AUG 40.3(31) 14.7(11) 0.0(0) 5.0(4)AMP 57.1(44) 33.3(25) 1.4(1) 12.5(10)AZI 2.6(2) 1.3(1) 0.0(0) 0.0(0)FOX 37.7(29) 13.3(10) 0.0(0) 5.0(4)TIO 31.2(24) 12.0(9) 0.0(0) 5.0(4)AXO 36.4(28) 13.3(10) 0.0(0) 6.3(5)CHL 29.9(23) 18.7(14) 1.4(1) 1.3(1)CIP 1.3(1) 1.3(1) 0.0(0) 0.0(0)GEN 13.0(10) 5.3(4) 0.0(0) 0.0(0)NAL 7.8(6) 4.0(3) 0.0(0) 0.0(0)STR 70.1(54) 38.7(29) 6.9(5) 21.3(17)FIS 67.5(52) 44.0(33) 11.1(8) 22.5(18)TET 81.8(63) 69.3(52) 26.4(19) 40.0(32)SXT 26.0(20) 8.0(6) 0.0(0) 2.5(2)

Liu,inpress2016

Page 21: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Noresistancedetected

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Sal.HeidlebergSal.NewportSal.TyphimuriumSal.NonTyphiSal.Typhi

NARMS‘14

Page 22: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

MalariaResistanceandLessonsLearned• White,et.al.,MalariaJournal,2009Resistance• Greater:fastparasitegrowthandhighburdens• Recrudescenceandmultiplerecrudescencearerequiredfordenovoselectionofresistance

• Inadvertenttreatmentofasymptomaticparasitemiaisunlikelysourceofresistance

• Strivefortherapeuticlevelsinallpatients• Illpatientswithhyperparasetemiaveryrisky

Page 23: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

AntibioticusetheonlycauseorsolutionforAMR?

• Genesinenvironment– Coselectionagainstmetals– Allowsforplasmidsandintegrons+cassettestoDNA

– Co-resistancetoheavymetalsallowsformaintenanceofresistance(pollutedcountries)

– Increaseduseoftracemineralstoimproveperformance

• Heavyindustrialimpact=greaterresistanceBerendonk,et.al,NatRevMicro,2015McAurther,et.al,MicroEcol,2015

Page 24: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

TheWorriedWell

ReviewAntibioticResistance,2014

Page 25: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

Example:ImportedShrimp• ~OnehundredpercentofVietnamese

shrimpfarmsuseciprofloxacin.• Fluoroquinoloneconcentrationsin

sedimentsandsurfacewatersmayreach>4,000μg/kg.

• Allkindsofbacteriainhabittheseponds,includingthosepresentinthemanureofterrestrialanimals(suchaschickens)thatisfedtotheshrimp

• “Wheredoesthislead?”

25

http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/35141.pdf

Page 26: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

SystemsApproachAdvantagesofUSFoodSupplyvs.ProductionForcedOutofCountry26

INTEGRATORDRIVEN

BMP/HACCP PROGRAMS

Food Safety and Security

Market Incentives

Rearing Practices &Housing

Environmental Stewardship

Diet Options

Antimicrobial Usage

Well being-Welfare

Page 27: Impact of Antibiotic Use in Animal Agriculture and

PennStateiscommittedtoaffirmativeaction,equalopportunityanddiversityofitsworkforce.