46
DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC TOOLS IN HAEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES IN 2010 (PART II) Flow cytometry

Immunophenotyping

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Diagnostic and prognostic tools in haematological malignancies in 2010 (Part II) Flow cytometry. Immunophenotyping. Identification of molecular protein characteristics of abnormal cells Labelling with fluorescent monospecific monoclonal antibodies Multiparametric flow cytometry. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Immunophenotyping

DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC TOOLS IN

HAEMATOLOGICALMALIGNANCIES IN 2010

(PART II)Flow cytometry

Page 2: Immunophenotyping

Immunophenotyping

• Identification of molecular protein characteristics of abnormal cells

• Labelling with fluorescent monospecific monoclonal antibodies

• Multiparametric flow cytometry

Page 3: Immunophenotyping
Page 4: Immunophenotyping

The objectives of immunophenotyping in hematological disorders

• Lineage assignment– Lymphoid acute/chronic– Myeloid acute/chronic

– Erythroid– Megakaryocytic

• Classification /Scoring• Detection of MPAL

• Maturation anomalies• Identification of Minimal Residual

Disease patterns

Page 5: Immunophenotyping

Before....

Before....

Page 6: Immunophenotyping

Now.....

Now.....

Harrogate 7th HLDA : 250 CDAdelaide 2004 8th HLDA : 339 CDBarcelona 2010 : >360 CD

Page 7: Immunophenotyping

Immunophenotype of lymphoid cells

• Well established maturation sequence• Staged and controlled to prepare long lived

antigen-specific cells• Identified by studying leukemias• Validated on normal cells• Numerous similarities between B and T

cells:– Lineage committment– Gene rearrangements for antigen recetpors– Selection

Page 8: Immunophenotyping

B lineage associated markers

CD19

ITAMITAM

CD22

or

ITIMITIMITIMITIM

ITIMITIMITIMITIM

ITAMITAM

CD20

P

CD24

CD21

NH2

COOH

CD23

BCRCD79

ITAM

ITAM

ITAM

ITAM

Page 9: Immunophenotyping

H0L0

Stem Cell

CD34 DR

H0L0

Pro-B Cell

cCD79 cCD22CD19

HxL0

Early-B Cell

cCD79CD22CD19 CD21 CD10

HxL0

cCD79 CD22CD19CD20CD21CD10

HRL0

Pre-B Cell

cCD79CD22CD19CD20CD21cµ

HRLR

Naive B cell

sCD79CD22CD19CD20CD21sµ/s

BONE MARROW

ACTIVATION &CLONAL PROLIFERATION

TISSUES

Plasma cells

Memory B cells

Immunocyte

Immunoblast

Page 10: Immunophenotyping

Classification of B- ALL (EGIL)

 cCD79/

CD19/c or sCD22

 CD10

 c-µ

 sIg

- - -

- -

-

B-I (pro-B) +

B-II (common)

+ +

B-III (pre-B) + + +

B-IV (mature) + + + +

Page 11: Immunophenotyping

T lineage associated markers

CD1

CD2

TCR

CD3

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAM

ITAMITAMITAMITAMITAMITAM ITAMITAM

CD4

CD5

CD8

CD7

Page 12: Immunophenotyping

BONE MARROW

Stem cell

CD34 DR

Pro-T cell

cCD3CD7CD2CD5

THYMUS

cCD3CD7CD2 CD5CD1

Cortico-thymocyte

XX

cCD3 CD7CD2CD5CD4CD8

XXXX

Medullary Thymocyte

sCD3CD7CD2CD5CD4

sCD3CD7CD2CD5CD8

XXRR

Naïve T cell

ACTIVATION& CLONAL PROLIFERATION

TISSUES

Immunocyte

Immunoblast

MemoryT cells

Effector T cells

Page 13: Immunophenotyping

Classification of T-ALL (EGIL)

  

cCD3

  

CD7

 CD2CD5CD8

  

CD1a+

 sCD3+/CD1a-

-

+ -

T-I (pro-T) + + - - -

T-II (pre-T) + + + -

T-III (cortical T)

+ + +

T-IV (mature T)

+ + + - +

Page 14: Immunophenotyping

Lymphoproliferative disorders

MANTLE ZONE

FOLLICULAR

CENTROBLASTIC orIMMUNOBLASTIC

Large cell Lymphomas

BURKITT

T LYMPHOMASSEZARY)LARGE CELLS ANAPLASTIC PERIPHERALANGIOCENTRICINTESTINAL

MARGINAL ZONE NODAL MALTHCL

INTESTINAL OR LUNG MALTFollicular, mantle zone, marginal zone

SLVLCirculating marginal zone cells

WALDENSTROM

MYELOMA

Page 15: Immunophenotyping

POSITIVE NEGATIVE OR WEAK

CD5 1 0

CD23 1 0

sIg 0 1

FMC7 0 1

CD22/CD79b 0 1

Matutes’ scoring of CLL

Page 16: Immunophenotyping

Comparative immunophenotypes

SMZL/SLVL

HCL HCLv CLL MCL FL

CD19

CD22

CD5

CD23

sIg IgM IgM, IgG..

IgG

CD43

FMC7

CD10

CD103

CD11c

CD25

CD79b

CD20

Page 17: Immunophenotyping

Immunophenotype of myeloid cells

• Known maturation sequence• Massive production of cells with no

specificity• Early and late differentiation

markers• Important lineage promiscuity

Page 18: Immunophenotyping

Myeloid lineage markers

CD13

EE

NH2

COOH

EE

CD14

LL

L

L

L

LL

L

L

L

P

CD33

CD11b

Mg

Mg

Mg

MPO

KK

CD117

CD15CD65

3-fucosyl-N-acetyl-lactosamine

céramide dodecasaccharide

CD36

CD35

Page 19: Immunophenotyping

Immature precursors

Differentiated cells

CD34DR

CD117CD13CD33MPOCD7

DRDR

CD4CD4

CD19CD19

CD11BCD11B

CD14CD14

CD36CD36

CD15CD15

CD65CD65

CD16CD16

CD32CD32

CD64CD64

DRDR

CD4CD4

CD19CD19

CD11BCD11B

CD14CD14

CD36CD36

CD15CD15

CD65CD65

CD16CD16

CD32CD32

CD64CD64

Stem cell

BONEMARRROW

PERIPHERALBLOODTISSUES

Page 20: Immunophenotyping

CFU-GM Myeloblast Promyelocyte MyelocyteMetamyelocyte

Band Granulocyte

HLA-DR

CD34

CD117

CD33

CD13

CD11c

CD15

CD66

CD15

CD66

CD11b

CD11b

CD11c

CD33

CD13

CD16

CD16

Evolution immunohénotypique au cours de la maturation granuleuse (B Husson)

Page 21: Immunophenotyping
Page 22: Immunophenotyping

Detection of BAL : EGIL’scoring system

• NOT to be used for lineage assignment• Scoring based on the lineage

specificity of critical differentiation antigens

• Calculation of each lineage “score”• In BAL, at least two lineages have

scores HIGHER than 2 • In “variant” AL coexpression with a

score <2 is not rare

Page 23: Immunophenotyping

Detection of BAL : EGIL ’scoring system

  

 B-

LINEAGE

 T-LINEAGE

 MYELOIDLINEAGE

2 points CD79cµ

cCD22

CD3TCR

MPO(lysozyme)

1 point CD19CD10CD20

CD2CD5CD8

CD10

CD13CD33

CDw65CD117

0.5 point TdTCD24

TdTCD7

CD1a

CD14CD15CD64

Page 24: Immunophenotyping

WHO’s new classification

Extensive immunophenotype

AULAcute

undifferentiated leukemia

MPALMixed

Phenotype Acute leukemia

OthersIncl NK

With t(9;22) With t(n;11q23)

NOS

Page 25: Immunophenotyping

WHO’s new criteria of MPAL

• Myeloid lineage – MPO– Or strong monocytic engagement

•NSE•CD14, CD11c, CD36, CD64, Lysozyme

• B-lineage– Bright CD19 + another B marker– Low CD19 + two other B markers

• T-lineage : cCD3 (strong, PE or APC)

Page 26: Immunophenotyping

One word on MDS

Page 27: Immunophenotyping

Proposition de score Wells, 2003

0

1

2

3

Page 28: Immunophenotyping

Working conference 2008M Loken, A van de Loosdrecht, K Ogata,

A Orfao, D Wells

• Classical blasts enumeration– DR+/11b-– CD34– CD117

• Anomalies of the CD13/CD16 pathway

• Abnormal expression anormale of DR on monocytes

Page 29: Immunophenotyping

Stachurski, 2008

• Blasts– CD34, CD117– Abnormal CD2, CD5, CD7, CD56– Increased CD117

• Granulocytes– Deganulation– Abnormal expression of CD33, CD13, CD11b, CD16, CD15, CD64,

CD10, CD14, DR• Monocytes

– Anomalies of CD33, CD13, CD11b, CD15, CD64, CD14, DR

Page 30: Immunophenotyping

In practice, for hematological malignancies

• Depending on– Previous clinical and

morphological information– Sample volume– Monoclonal antibodies

availability

Page 31: Immunophenotyping

Consensual European Panel, European LeukemiaNet (2005)

For quick orientation or paucicellular samples• cCD3, MPO, cCD79a, TdT• CD7, CD2, CD10, CD19, CD22 (s or c), sIg,

CD13, CD33, CD34• CD45 for gating purposesSublineage classification and definition of

clinical entities (also with adapted gating strategy)

• DR, CD1a, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD3 (m), IgM (c), CD14, CD117, CD56, CD65, CD41 or CD61, RBC marker such as glycophorin A

Complementary panel of useful referenced markers

Page 32: Immunophenotyping

Acute leukemia Diagnosis PanelOther useful markers (>20)

• MPO/LF (lactoferrin) (c): (i) Identification of late neutrophil granulocyte compartment (Lactoferrin positive) (25,52,54); (ii) for refined detection/quantification of MPO+ early myeloid cells in combination with CD14 (25,49)

• LZ (lysozyme) (c): (i) for myeloblastic leukaemia; (ii) to discriminate pDCs and myeloid cells (53); (iii) to positively identify early monocytic cells (48)

• K/L : (i) on surface for clonality, (ii) in the cytoplasm for rare B-IV cases• CD11b, CD11c : negative in APL (14)• CD15 : for myeloblastic leukemia (42)• CD16 : to discriminate mature PMNs (9)• CD35/36 : for GEIL´s AML classification (11), for RBC after excluding

monocytes (10)• CD58 : to distinguish between normal regenerating B cells and B-cell

blasts (59)• CD64 : for AML (9)• CD68 (c): (i) for AML (bright) and subset of B-ALL (weak) (53); (ii) for

positive identification of normal pDCs (bright) (55)• CD71 : for cell proliferation/activation and/or RBC (22,41)• CD86 : prognostic factor in AML (34)• CD99 : to differentiate between blasts and non blastic T-cells (19)• CD123 : IL-3 R, for pDC and AML, some NK (24)• TCR chains for T-ALL, c and/or s (50)• Therapeutic targets: CD20 (40), CD52 (40), CD45 (39), CD33 (31), CD123

(3), CD87 (46), CD44 (20), uPAR(CD87)/uPACD116 (1)

Page 33: Immunophenotyping

Chronic lymphoproliferative diseases.

Mandatory panel (20 Abs)• Samples : peripheral blood, bone marrow, LN

suspensions… (Fine needle aspiration for primary screeening to avoid unnecessary biopsies)

• Gating markers CD19, CD3, CD56*

• B oriented panel gated on CD19CD5, CD20, CD23, CD103, CD10, K, L, Ig, CD25,

CD79b, CD38

• T oriented panel gated on CD3 or other T-lineage marker

CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD7,

Page 34: Immunophenotyping

Lymphoproliferative diseases: additional useful markers (< 15)

• B lineage– CD2, CD7, CD123, FMC7, CD138, DR, CD24*,

CD43– (G, A, M, D), CD81*– Cytoplasmic : Bcl2, Zap70 (relative to internal

control)• T lineage

– TCRs*, CD30, CD10• NK panel excluding CD19 and CD3 cells/

CD56– CD57, CD16, CD94, perforin, granzyme B

*CD81/CD22 useful for CLLfollow-up based on dim co-expression level

*V-beta panel and imunophenotype*Absence of CD24 on marginal zone and HCL• Note : CD52 if alemtuzumab considered

Page 35: Immunophenotyping

Chemosensitivity

• Minimal residual disease• Quick assessment of response

to therapy

Page 36: Immunophenotyping

Why look for minimal residual disease?

Page 37: Immunophenotyping

The founders

Campana, 1999San Miguel, 1997

Kern, 2004

Page 38: Immunophenotyping

MRD in ALL

Page 39: Immunophenotyping

MRD B-II ALL

CD19

CD

34

1.5 x 10-2

Page 40: Immunophenotyping

MRD in AML

Page 41: Immunophenotyping

2.1 10-3

CD34

CD

11

7

MRD - AML

Page 42: Immunophenotyping

AML peripheral blast cells decrease

Page 43: Immunophenotyping

SS

C

CD45b

SS

C

CD14c

BS

SC

CD16d

CS

SC

FSCa

A

CD45

CD

11b

e

D

CD11b

CD

16

g CD11b

CD

16

5.3%

100

h

Blasts

CD45

CD

16

f

E

D0

Page 44: Immunophenotyping

D1

CD11b

CD

16

a

CD11b

CD

16

3.9%

73.7

b

Blasts

D2

CD11b

CD

16

c

CD11b

CD

16

1.1%

21.2

d

Blasts

D3

CD11b

CD

160.5%

9.4

f

Blasts

CD11b

CD

16

e CD11b

CD

16

g

D4

CD11b

CD

16

0.2%

3.6

h

Blasts

Page 45: Immunophenotyping

Blast slope

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Time (Days)

DF

S

Slope < -25

Slope -25 < > -15

Slope > -15

Page 46: Immunophenotyping

Conclusions

• Consensual approach • Rapid and informative diagnostic tool• Precise definition of the disease at

diagnosis• Therapeutic indications• Aberrant immunophenotypes useful

for follow up• Search for new markers:

– New monoclonals– Microarrays