Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Applications of yield monitoring
systems and agricultural statistics
in agricultural (re)insurance
18 October 2018
Ernst Bedacht
Image: used under license from shutterstock.com
Agenda
Introduction
1. Munich Re
Parametric Insurance Solutions
2. Weather
3. Yield
4. NDVI
5. Crop Models
Conclusions
06 October 2017 2
Added value within the groupDiversified structure – more security
Reinsurance Primary insurance
Asset Management
Munich Re (Group)1
06 October 2017Company Presentation Munich Re1 This listing is incomplete and provides no precise indication of shareholdings.
Munich Re (Group)
3
Munich ReWorld market leader in agricultural (re)insurance (Indemnity Based Agricultural
Insurance, Parametric Insurance, Crop Revenue Insurance)
6 October 20174
Goal:
Provide a product that helps the farmers in adverse conditions, is objective/transparent and gives the insurer
the ability to assess the inherent risk.
06 October 2017 5
Challenges for Parametric Products
Product Requirements Challenges
Basis RiskMinimizing the basis risk by being as close to the farmers
risk as possibleBasis risk can never be avoided in parametric products
TransparencyThe parametric product (index calculation) needs to be
well documented and understood by the InsuredComplexity vs. Transparency
Data AvailabilityReliable data source to ensure permanent delivery and
have adequate fallback procedures in place
Satellites products might depend on clouds
Technical problems may take long to solve
Data history Homogeneous data history in order to assess the risk
From our experience, 10 years of data provides
reasonable information, but the more the better, also
depending on the loss entry probability.
Extreme scenariosHow can rare events (e.g. Natcat) influence the parametric
cover?Hard to assess if not observed
TriggersImportant to understand the intention of the cover as
triggers should ideally reflect the agronomical risk
Difficult task requiring data analysis and agronomical
background
Weather3
Potential perils: drought, excessive rainfall
(1) Rain gauge‐only products that build only on observations using different interpolation methods, e.g.
Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) monthly precipitation, the Climatic Research Unit (CRU)
monthly precipitation, Climate Prediction Center (CPC) unified gauge‐based analysis of daily
precipitation
(2) Reanalysis products, i.e. products from data assimilation schemes and numerical weather predictions
or atmospheric models that use a combination of atmospheric variables from various sources as inputs,
e.g. the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) reanalysis or products from National Centers for
Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR) and European
Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
(3) Satellite‐only products that use infra‐red (IR), microwave (MV) or IR‐MV combined information, e.g.
CHIRP, CMORPH_RAW, CHOMPS
(4) Satellite‐gauge products that combine gauge‐only and satellite‐only products through different bias
correction or blending procedures, e.g. TRMM, CMORPH, PERSIANN, and CHIRPS
06 October 2017 7
RainfallData Set Classification
8
Data used: CHIRPS
Description
CHIRPS: Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station
data
Early research focused on combining models of terrain-induced
precipitation enhancement with interpolated station data
New resources of satellite observations such as gridded satellite-
based precipitation estimates from NASA and NOAA have been
leveraged to build high resolution (0.05°) gridded precipitation
climatologies. When applied to satellite-based precipitation fields,
these improved climatologies can remove systematic bias
Horizontal resolution: 0,05°x 0,05°
Available from 1981 – now
Latency: Final CHIRPS (all station data) is available sometime in the
third week of the following month
http://chg.geog.ucsb.edu/data/chirps/
Rainfall CHIRPSWeather index based crop protection on County Level in China
9
Basic Concept
Description
Divide the growing season of each crop in three 6-8 weeks risk
periods, starting with the planting date
Protect drought in all three periods and excessive rainfall just in the
third period (harvest)
Calculate the county wide rainfall per period for all years available
Either: Estimate reasonable rainfall triggers for drought and
excessive rainfall per period.
Or: Set target rate on line for each period (drought and excessive
rainfall) and calculate the corresponding triggers
Pros
Concept is applicable in all
relevant growing areas of the
world
Satellite rainfall data helps a
lot in areas where the weather
station density is low
Works good for larger scale
(countywide) drought or
excessive rainfall events
Independent and public data
source
Cons
Basis risk of weather index for
crop shortfall
Latency of the data (data is
available sometime in the
third week of the following
month)
Does not work for single
fields/farms
Rainfall CHIRPSWeather index based crop protection on County Level in China
10
Rainfall and Temperature Ukraine
Perils covered
• Drought and Heat stress
• Crops: Corn, Winter Wheat
Data used
• Interpolated Daily Meteorological data (temp, rainfall)
• MeteoGroup, based on weather station data
• Historical data: 1991-2016
• Resolution: 25x25km
Weather Index
• Heat Stress Period:
No of days with Tmax > Critical Temperature
• Drought Period (31/41 days):
40% of long-term average rainfall
Yield2
Potential perils: all
Data Sets
Public available data (based on surveys or crop cutting experiments)
Examples: USDA (USA), IBGE (Brazil), SIAP (Mexico), …
Important considerations:
Basis Risk for the single farmer (due to size of areas)
Quality and availability of data
06 October 2017 12
Area Yield
2016: Huge shift from weather based crop insurance (WBCIS) to area yield crop insurance (PMFBY =
Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana)
Market Premium ~ 3bn US$
Rate paid by farmer (loanee and non-loanee) is not higher than 2%, rest is subsidized by state and
government
For some crops (e.g. Rice) on a very high resolution (Gram panchayat, ~250.000 in India) or on block
level (~ 5.500 in India)
Perils covered:
- Prevented Sowing – due to deficit rainfall/adverse weather
- Standing Crop - due to Drought, Dry Spell, Flood, Inundation, Pest & Diseases, Landslides, Natural
Fire and Lightening, Storm, Hailstorm, Cyclone, Typhoon, Tempest, Hurricane & Tornado
- Post Harvest Losses - maximum up to 2 weeks in cut and spread condition due to cyclonic and
unseasonal rains
- Localized Calamities - Hailstorm, Landslide & Inundation affecting individual farms 06 October 2017 13
Area YieldExample India
Every state of India manages the PMFBY
State is divided in several clusters which consist of some districts
The primary insurers bid for each cluster and the cheapest gets the cluster
Most important pitfalls:
Potential trends in yield data
Change in spatial dimension of areas aggregated for pricing and settlement (Block and Gram
panchayat)
Challenges with Crop Cutting Experiment process
06 October 2017 14
Area YieldExample India
Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index (NDVI)
4
Parameter: NDVI
Potential perils: Lack of Biomass production (e.g. drought)
Data Sets
Satellites providing NDVI values
06 October 2017 16
Dataset Details Temporal Coverage Temporal Resolution LatencySpatial
Resolution
MODIS
moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) is built
by Santa Barbara Remote Sensing that was launched into Earth
orbit by NASA in 1999 on board the Terra Satellite, and in 2002 on
board the Aqua satellite.
2000 - present Both daily few days 250m
LANDSAT
Landsat, a joint initiative between the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) and NASA, represents the world's longest continuously
acquired collection of space-based moderate-resolution land
remote sensing data.
1972 - present 16-days up to 7 weeks 30m
SENTINEL
Sentinel-2 is an Earth observation mission developed by ESA as
part of the Copernicus Programme to perform terrestrial
observations (Sentinel 2A & 2B)
2015 - present 5-days few days 20m
06 October 2017 17
Data used: NDVI
Description
NDVI (MODIS): MODIS 8-day composite developed and provided by
the NASA/GSFC/GIMMS group for the USDA/FAS/IPAD Global
Agricultural Monitoring project https://glam1.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Use relevant gridcells and Images for the relevant riskperiod
Define Index (e.g. average NDVI of the gridcells over the riskperiod
per year)
Define trigger value for the NDVI and Payoutfunction
Horizontal resolution: 0,25°x 0,25° (is only available aggregated)
Available from 2002 – now
Latency: few days
https://glam1.gsfc.nasa.gov/
NDVI ModisExample Australia
Crop Models5
06 October 2017 19
Modelled Yield-index
Statistical Crop Model
Process-based Crop
Model
Yield data
Weather data
Remote sensing data https://www.gaf.de/
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/
Crop Yield Estimation ProjectOutlook
Conclusions6
Unfortunately,
always comes with basic risk
the smaller the farmers, the larger the basis risk
But,
Transparent and objective
Quick loss payments possible
Systemic risks like drought or excessive rainfall can be covered on an aggregated scale (catastrophic
risks)
from a worldwide perspective, no clear preference regarding preferred parameters
data availability, quality and resolution will improve over time, which will lead to more tailored products
06 October 2017 21
Parametric productsExperience and Conclusions
Thank you for your attention
Image: used under license from shutterstock.com
Ernst Bedacht
www.munichre.com/agro