Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IMAGE CODING USING WAVELET TRANSFORM, VECTOR QUANTIZATION, AND ZEROTREES
Juan Claudio Regidor Barrientos *, Maria Angeles Losada Binue **, Antonio Artes Rodriguez **, Francisco D’Alvano *, Luis Urbano *
(*) Grupo de Procesamiento de SeFiales, Departamento de Electronica y Circuitos, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Aptdo. 89000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela.
Tel.: (58)(2) 906-36-30, Fax: (58)(2) 906-36-3 1 , e-mail: [email protected],ve, [email protected], [email protected]
(* *) Departamento de Sefiales, Sistemas y Radiocomunicaciones, Escuela Tecnica Superior de lngenieros de Telecomunicacion, Universidad PolitCcnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, s/n, Madrid 28040, Espafla.
Tel.: (34)( 1) 549-5700, ext. 23 I , Fax: (34)( 1) 336-7350, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract. This paper proposes an image coding procedure that combines the vector quantization of a wavelet-transformed image and a modified form of Shapiro’s zerotree elimination algorithm. With this new approach, applied to radiographs, we have obtained compression rates better than with other methods tested at the ETSIT-UPM, with subjective quality of the reconstructed images ranging from very good to acceptable. We are continuing this research to refine the many parameters that affect the results.
INTRODUCTION
Image storage and transmission pose an important problem to the development of intelligent commu- nication systems due to memory and bandwidth requirements. Consequently, many different image compression techniques have been devised during the last few decades. Although lossless or reversible schemes are very desirable, the achieved compression ratios are relatively low, which makes necessary the use of lossy (irreversible) schemes, allowing some distortion in the reconstructed images. The efficiency of a coder can be defined as the image quality for a given bit rate and, for a lossy method, is generally increased at the cost of computational complexity [ I ] .
The Wavelet transform, or hierarchical sub-band decomposition [2], separates the information of the image at different scales and orientations, without changing the image size. Vector quantization (VQ) of these transformed images [ 3 ] gives a good compression, without the blocking effects usually found in images coded using VQ in the spatial domain.
The embedded zerotree wavelet (EZW) algorithm introduced by Shapiro [4], is a relatively simple tech-
nique that is based on the wavelet transform, followed by the prediction of the absence of significant informa- tion across scales due to the self-similarity inherent in transformed images [5]. It addresses the two-fold problem of obtaining the best image quality for a given rate and accomplishing this task in an embedded fashion, Le., in such a way that all encodings of the same image at lower bit rates are contained in the beginning of the bit stream for the target bit rate.
We have combined the information reduction achieved with vector quantization, with a modified version of the basic EZW algorithm in a compression technique that produces reconstructed images with very good subjective quality. The bases of both algorithms are explained in the next section, and our method and the conclusions based on the comparison of the results for a thorax radiography are presented afterwards.
11. ALGORITHMS
2.1 - Wavelet Transform
The Wavelet Transform (WT) or multiresolution analy- sis represents a function as a superposition of a family of dilated and translated versions of two functions, the mother wavelet and its related scaling fUnCt1on. This can be viewed as the decomposition of the function with a band-pass filter bank, each filter separating a range of resolutions or scales. For the two-dimensional case, the filters are applied to the horizontal and vertical directions, producing a series of sub-images as shown in Fig. 1. The WT does not change the number of pixels required to represent the image, but separates the information in a way that resembles the human visual system [5].
0-7803-4434-0 I 9 8 l $ l O . O O 0 1998 IEEE 166
2.2 - Vector Quantization
fl
Vector Quantization (VQ) has been applied to image compression, either by coding of the image itself or by some transformation of it. In VQ, a group of pixels, called a vector, is approximated by another one taken from a table of admissible vectors, the codebook, and coded simply by the index of this vector in the table. The codebook is created by some optimization algo- rithm, applied over a series of images similar to the ones to be coded, or training set. As discussed in [3], application of VQ to the WT of an image requires the creation of one codebook for each scale and orientation in the transformed image.
2.3 - Embedded zerotree wavelet
The EZW algorithm is based in the construction of two lists for a given image that has been previously decor- related with a wavelet transform. In the first list, called the dominant list, the information about the significance of a coefficient is coded. In the second, or significant list, only the values for the significant coefficients are kept up to a given degree of precision.
In Shapiro’s scheme, the significance of a coefficient at a given iteration is determined based on its comparison with a threshold (T). If the value of the coefficient is greater than T, the coefficient is significant while, if it is smaller than T, it is considered insignificant. When the coefficient is significant, it can be positive (P) or negative (N). When the coefficient value is below threshold, the values of its descendants, which are the corresponding coefficients in lower scales, are analyzed. The parent-child relationships are described in Figure 1. If all the descendants are insignificant, the coefficient is coded as a zerotree root (ZTR) and all its children are discarded from further processing. When some of the descendants are significant, however, we have an isolated zero (IZ), and the descendants have to be codified individually. In summary, 4 symbols (2 bits) are necessary to code completely the dominant list. The same procedure is performed in all scales with a prefixed order (given in Figure 2) until the dominant list is completed. Then, the same scheme is repeated iteratively reducing the threshold at each iteration, and in this way, the values of the coefficients are successively approximated.
111. METHODOLOGY
The proposed procedure has four steps:
i) Obtaining the Wavelet Transform of the image.
ii) Each sub-band in the transform is independently coded using vector quantization, except for the lowest frequency band, on which scalar quantization to eight bits is used. In this preliminary work, all subbands are coded using a 256-vector codebook, which gives the same compression for the three sub-bands of each scale.
Figure I : Parent-child (dependencies of sub-bands. The arrows point from parents to children. This scheme can be extended to larger number of sub- bands.
Figure 2: Scanning order of the sub-bands foi encoding a significant map. The lower frequency sub-band is at the top left and the higher frequency sub-band at the bottom right. This scheme can be extended to larger number of sub-bands
167
iii) The VQ coded sub-bands are subjected to an infor- mation elimination procedure based on the EZW. We define a significant vector as one whose distance to the origin is greater than a selectable threshold, T. Sub- bands are scanned as in Fig. 2, maintaining two lists: the significance map (SM), and the significant vectors (SV). The SM has positional information for each sub- band. For the lowest frequency sub-bands, the SM has a one to one correspondence with the sub-band vectors, with three possible values: significant vector, isolated zero (less than T but with significant descendants) or zerotree root (this vector and all its descendants are less than T). For higher frequency sub-bands, the SM in- cludes only those vectors that do not belong to a zerotree. Vectors in the highest frequency sub-bands have no children, and can only be significant or non significant, requiring only two symbols. When a vector in any scale is significant, its index is added to the significant vector list. Only one pass is made through the image, as the vector indexes saved represent the f d l precision of the significant vectors. In this procedure, T is fixed and controls the quality of the reconstructed image. A file is generated which contains both the SM and SV lists, and the scalar-coded low frequency image.
Threshold
1 164
iv) Finally, this file is further compressed using arithmetic coding, using the standard application "zip".
Compression rate SNR (dB)
30: 1 45.8
Although our procedure sacrifices the embedded encoding properties of Shapiro's algorithm, it still maintains the WT good properties for a progressive transmission scheme.
1 I32 1/16
IV. RESULTS
42: 1 44. I 53.1 42.0
Two sets of experiments have been realized, using the length 8 Daubechies wavelet. In the first set, an image (thorax radiography) of size 512x512 was transformed to three scales, and each sub-band was vector quantized using codebooks trained over ten similarly transformed radiographs; the quantization for all sub-bands uses 8-bit indexes to represent vectors of four elements (2x2 blocks). The threshold is a fraction of the greatest magnitude vector found in all sub-bands, and varies between 1/64 and 1/16 of this value. Figure 3 shows the original image and the reconstructed one for a threshold of 1/64. Figure 4 shows an amplified view of a section of the original image and the reconstructed images for threshold 1/64 and 1/16. The results are summarized in Table I. The compression rates range from 30:l with very good subjective quality, to 53:l with acceptable quality. As is frequently found, the SNR is a poor guide to the visual quality of the reconstructed image.
(a) Original image
(b) Reconstructed image. Threshold 1/64, compression 30: 1
Figure 3.- Experiment 1. Results for the 512x512 image
168
The second set of experiments was similar, but using a bigger image, 864x864 pixels, and transforming to four scales. We expected better compression rates, as the low frequency band (which is compressed only arithmetically) now represents a lower percentage of the total data. However, the magnitude of the coefficients in the WT rises in each new scale added; this introduces greater errors in the quantization of the low frequency band, and more high frequency information is discarded as non significant, with an overall loss in visual quality.
(a) Original image
(b) Reconstructed image. Threshold 1/64, compression 30: 1
The threshold varies between 112.56 and 1/64 of the maximum magnitude vector. Figure 5 shows about 80% of the images, both the original and the reconstructed from threshold 1/90. Figure 6 shows an amplified section of the original andl three reconstructed images, compressed with different thresholds. Numerical results are summarized in Table 11. The compression rate goes from 1 :37 (good quality) to 1 : lo0 (acceptable).
Table TI Experiment 2
43.9
100: 1 43.2
V. CONCLUSIONS The results presented here compare very favorably against those obtained at the ETSIT-UPM in other project, using VQ over Discrete Cosine Transform of the image. In this work, a compression rate of 14:l gave acceptable quality of the reconstructed images, with SNR around 40.8 dB, and notable "block" artifacts.
(c) Reconstructed image. Threshold 111 6, compression 53: 1
Figure 4.- Experiment 1 . Amplified 256x256 section
169
37: I , 46.3 dB, although subjectively the differences are almost unnoticeable,) but did not perform as well as the proposed method for higher rates (for the 512x512 image at 53:1, 43.4 dB, and for the 864x864 one at lOO:l, 42.1 dB, and notably lower visual quality.) This is probably due to the SNR of the reconstructed image being limited by the quality of the VQ step when few vectors are discarded. This suggests that fine tuning of the VQ step can give better performance for the proposed method in every case.
Many parameters in the proposed method can be changed, as, for example, the wavelet type, the filter length, the threshold magnitude for each sub-band, and the definition of significant vector. Specially critical, as discussed in [3], is the number of bits assigned to each sub-band in the VQ step. To find an optimal combination of these parameters is the subject of our present research, as is the medical validation of the results. Also of interest is the application of this method to normal b&w and color photographs (a) Original image
ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported in part by the project BID- CONICIT E-] 8 (New Technologies Program), and by Universidad Simon Bolivar.
(b) Reconstructed image. Threshold 1/90, compression 78: 1
Figure 5 . - Experiment 2. 768x768 pixel section of the images
REFERENCES [ l ] Jayant, N. , Speech and image coding, special issue of IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm., SAC-10(5), 1992. [2] Vetterli, M., Herley, C., "Wavelets and filter banks: Theory and Design", IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 2207-2232, Sep. 1992. [3] Antonini, M., Barlaud, M., Mathieu, P., Daubechies, I., "Image Coding Using Wavelet Transform", IEEE Trans. Image Proc., Vol. 1 , pp. 205-220, Apr. 1992. [4] Shapiro, J. M., "Embedded Image Coding Using Zerotrees of Wavelet Coefficients", IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., Vol. 41,No. 12, pp. 3445-3462, Dec. 1993. [5] Field, D. J., "Scale invariance and self-similar wavelet transform: an analysis of natural images and mammalian visual systems", In "Wavelets, Fractals and Fourier Transform", D. M. Farge, J. C. R. Hunt and J. C. Vassilicos, Clarendon Press. Oxford 1993.
A test run using Shapiro's algorithm gave slightly better results at lower compression rates (for the 5 12x5 12 image at 30:1, 45.7 dB, and for the 864x854 one at
170
(a) Original image (b) Reconstructed irnage. Threshold 1 /256, compression 37: 1
(c) Reconstructed image. Threshold 1/90, compression 78: 1
(d) Reconstructed image. Threshold 1/64, compression 100: 1
Figure 6.- Experiment 2. Amplified 256x256 section
171
