135
« OJ ^~ 1 — a) 0 £ co co J=E ! t_ U- fl. (0 •t-l _J 5 « 5 c cl "° ill tj u- 2 •M 4^ 0) >>* OT C * s - £ jjj : (U -M O •— £* i C/l §15 GO 1 t/1 13 CO X U") LO - O COtO 1 CO ~* OS «C 1 O u cn cn CM • O CO i/) o cj m CO Z « CM ^^ - O CO tO g< 1 o cn CO I -H ^* 0 - O CO CM t CO »-4 O U O 1 i ————— —————— —————— ————— -J ————— f^J.——— ————— -J ————— P^pQ ————— ~^ —————— , ooooooooooooooooo •-* ^H co -^ «n •-* 3333=33C03=333CQC033^3 §OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOC3OC3OOOOr*%^TOOCMO 3 -J 3—1 3 CO 3 c^oooocoooooooooocno O cn P^^^^H o «-» to CM CM —* cn CM co to CM ~« cn -* CM 3 CO 3 3 —I 3ca 3 ooooooooooooooocno co en co to ^^ *•« o ^r —4 CM i-i =-. 3 OOOOCM-HOOOOOOOOO-.O gtO^OJOOO^.-.CM^gCOOOOCM ^-t O CM (O CO ~* CM ^^^^ Ot ^^ Ol Ol c £ W ^^ ^"^ 5P 5P S *^^ "*^ ff ^ o\^^ ««^ oi ^^ •••^ *^^ £ Qt S B *"^ 3* O B ^ ^ B O § c" u *"*••- g 5 §*"^* a) i" §"— a) >^" — i'~ iJ^55'S^ *"2 ^'— "" c 3 *" S*j $•£ J"-S^ §5 &S o"S SiS'iJ'u ^-euiogiia«jeoo><k«ijsi«a(->- ^^4QQOUCJCJUUCJ*H*^XZZZ _ _ ^ __. ^ ^^ o a a o o o a S "" ~S"~2 = o o a o o o o o o o o o o co co to ^^ ^= = _. 3 cn to o cn o o Sc\j ^H in (M 03 3 3 -J o < o o m o o » "* <O r^ T = 3 3 -J a m o o in a a £ o -. « o in r^ !>. -4 ^ *o» "3"3 ^^*3>'3^^ E » ^ ^ cn cn«-^ ~i^"^,=,i5' |]^lll 4J *— -2 "5 *« C C O ^J -^ O .C *O '^ SR301230

il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

«OJ~

1— a)

0 £co co

J=E !t_ U- fl.

(0 '£•t-l _J 5« 5

c cl "°illtj u- 2•M 40) >>*

OT C *

s - £jjj :(U -M

O •—

£*

iC/l

§15GO1 t/1

13CO X

U") LO -O CO tO1 CO ~*OS «C 1O u cn

cn CM •O CO i/)

o cj mCO Z — «

CM ^^ -O CO tO

g< 1o cnCO I -H

^* 0 -O CO CM

t CO »-4

O U O

1i

————— —————— —————— ————— -J ————— f^J.——— ————— -J ————— P^pQ ————— ~^ ——————

,ooooooooooooooooo

•-* H co - «n •-*

3333=33C03=333CQC033^3§ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC3OC3OOOOr*%^TOOCMO

3 -J 3—1 3 CO 3c^oooocoooooooooocno

O cn P^^^^H o «-» to CM CM—* cn CM co toCM ~« cn-* CM

3 CO 3 3 —I 3ca 3ooooooooooooooocno

co en co to ^*•« o r—4 CM

i-i =-. 3OOOOCM-HOOOOOOOOO-.O

gtO^OJOOO^.-.CM^gCOOOOCM-t O CM (O CO

~* CM

^ ^ Ot ^ Ol Ol

c £ W ^ " 5P 5P S * ^ "* ff o\ ^ «« oi ^••• *^^ £ Qt S B *"^ 3* O B B O

§ c" u *"*••- g 5 §*" * a) i" §"— a) >^"— i'~ iJ^55'S^ *"2 ' — "" c 3 *"S*j $•£ J"-S^ §5 &S o"S SiS'iJ'u^ - e u i o g i i a « j e o o > < k « i j s i « a ( - > -^^4QQOUCJCJUUCJ*H*^XZZZ

_ _ _ _ . ^

o a a o o o a

S "" ~ S " ~ 2

=o o a o o o oo o o o o o coco to ^

^= = _.3 cn to o cn o o

S c \ j ^H in(M

03 3 3 -Jo — < o o m o o

» "* <O r

T= 3 3 -J

a m o o in a a£ o -. « o in r^!>. -4

^ *o» "3"3^ *3>'3 ^E » cn cn«-^~i " ,=,i5'|] lll4J *— -2 "5 *« C CO J - O .C *O '

SR301230

Page 2: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. II

30/SEPT/91

aR30!23i

Page 3: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

AR30I232

Page 4: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TETRA TECH INC. - BORING LOG SHEET: 1 OF

PROJECT: Butz Landfill PROJECT NO. T4204-03BORING DESIGNATION; Failed T5 Borings (3) DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/06/90DRILLING CONTRACTOR; Walton Drill ing Corp. DRILLING METHOD: Hollow-Stem AugerBORING DIAMETER: 8" SAMPLING INTERVAL: NASAMPLING METHOD; Cuttings TOTAL DEPTH:LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerGROUT TYPE: NA GROUT METHOD: NASTATIC WATER DEPTH: REFERENCE:DATE:REMARKS: Four borings were driTiled in an attempt to install well "T5" downgradient from

well T2. The first 3 borings were not used because no ground water was encounteredor because of the shallow depth to bedrock.

LITHOL06ICINTERVAL

SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOOK BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATIONOF MATERIAL

Boring 10.0-6.0 Water level

9 1.0'Auger refusal @ 6.0* (fine sandstone bedrock, trace shales);moved to new location

Boring 20.0-6.5 No water

encounteredAuger refusal 9 6.5' (brown andgray shales laying over fine sandstones); moved to new location

Boring 30.0-7.2 No water

encounteredAuger refusal 9 7.2'

flR30i233

Page 5: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TETRA TECH INC. - HELL DRILLING LOG

PROJECT: Butz LandfillWELL DESIGNATION: T5DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Walton CorporationBORING DIAMETER: 8"SAMPLING INTERVAL: NA

PERMIT NO.SHEET: 1 OF 1PROJECT NO. T4204-03 ^DATE(S) DRILLED: 12/07/90 P|DRILLING METHOD: Hollow-Stem AugerSAMPLING METHOD: CuttingsTOTAL DEPTH: 17'

LOGGED BY: R. H. BoedekerSCREENED SIZEAND MATERIAL: 4" PVC 0.010" SlotCASING SIZE AND MATERIAL: 4" PVCGRAVEL PACK SIZE: #2 Morie sandGROUT TYPE: Type I cementGROUTING METHOD: GravityDEVELOPMENT MechanicalMETHOD: Surging/Pumping TIME:STATIC WATER DEPTH: 10.49' DATE: 12/13/90

REMARKS:

LITHOLOGICINTERVAL

0.0-8.58.5-16.0

16.0-17.0

17.0

SCREENED INTERVAL: 17-8. 5 'CASED INTERVAL: 8.5-0'PACKED INTERVAL: 17-7.0'GROUTED INTERVAL: 5.4'-0BENTONITE SEAL: 7.0-5.4"ESTIMATEDYIELD: <1 gpmREFERENCE: top of casing

SAMPLEINTERVAL SPOOK BLOWS RECOVERY

CLASSIFICATIONOF MATERIAL

Clayey silt: reddish brownSandstone: light green; weatheredShale: redAUGER REFUSAL - END OF BORING

II

——— 4~HR3QI23U

Page 6: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

Page 7: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL SAMPLING DATA

SR301236

Page 8: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: , R1S

DEPTH TO WATER 12.70 ft WELL VOLUME " 131 gala

TOTAL DEPTH 103.0 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

WELL DIAMETER 6 inches DATE PURGED 10/30/90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY1000 -_____ - 200 umhos1020 6.14 - 2301040 6.34 - 240

NOTES: Temp, probe not operating correctly. Purged at 10 gpmfor approximately 40 minutes or total of 400 gals.

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATIONS TlAi

DEPTH TO WATER 11.52 ft WELL VOLUME 1.14 gals

TOTAL DEPTH 17.7 ft PURGE METHOD Pumo

WELL DIAMETER 2 inches DATE PURGED 10-30-90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY1038 6.32 - 2601046 6.34 - 260

NOTES: Temp, probe not working. Pumped 1.5 gpm for 11 minutesor total volume of 16.5 gals.

•• ' -<'• '•••• •••" ••''^ • '•:""::

DEPTH TO WATER 11.16 ft WELL VOLUME 2.28 gals

TOTAL DEPTH 21.0 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

WELL DIAMETER 2 inches DATE PURGED 10-30-90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY1347 6.32 _r_____ 901352 6.41 _r_____ 2401354 6.38 _r_____ 1801359 6.33 _j:_____ 280

NOTES: Temp, probe not working. Purged 1.5 gpm for 15 minutesor total of 22.5 gals.

5R30I237

Page 9: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

iDEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME

WELL/SAMPLE

20.27 ft

244 ft

6 inches

pH

DESIGNATION: RID

WELL

PURGE

DATE

TEMP

VOLUME 337 qals

METHOD Pump

PURGED 10-30-90

CONDUCTIVITY

NOTES: Pumped at 5 gpm through carbon cannister on and off allday. Low yield prevented constant pumping. Pumped approximately337 gals.

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATIONS Rl.lB

DEPTH TO WATER ____12.99 ft WELL VOLUME 254 aals

TOTAL DEPTH _____184.5 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

WELL DIAMETER 6 inches DATE PURGED 10/31/90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY- 6.29 -___ 190 umhoa- 6.02 - 100- 5.92 - 65

_____ 5.89 - 75

NOTES: Temp, probe not operating correctly. Purged at 8 gpmuntil dry or total of approximately 250 gals.

WELL7SAMg£B BESIGHaglOB:: TI. IS

DEPTH TO WATER 12.20 ft WELL VOLUME 0.37 aals

TOTAL DEPTH 14.5 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

WELL DIAMETER 2 inches DATE PURGED 10-31-90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY0911 5.46 - 300930 5.80 - 500943 5.87 - 50

NOTES: Temp, probe not working. Pumped total of 7.5 gals,

Page 10: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

| : WELS/SAMPLE DESIGNATION* Rl.lA ||

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME12551400

22.76 ft WELL VOLUME 266 qals

204 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 10-31-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY7.13 11 C 1065.76 - 120

NOTES : Purged580 gals.

10 gpm for 58 minutes or until dry for total of

j - WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION* Tl. 1A ; |

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME

13.55 ft WELL VOLUME 1.25 qals

15.45 ft PURGE METHOD Bailer

4 inches DATE PURGED 10/31/90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY

NOTES : Bailed well until dry. Removed total of 1.25 gals.

P "-••': ' •• '• • : *ji ' ' ' v?" ••<• 1

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME1350141314301455

10.0 ft WELL VOLUME 185 aals

136.5 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 10-31-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY6.50 11 C 958.75 10.5 1456.38 11.0 1426.61 11.0 153

NOTES: Pumped between 6.6 and 9 gpm for total of 595 gals.Pumped water through carbon cannister.

Page 11: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WE'LL DIAMETER

TIME

WELL/ SAMPLE

3.2 ft

19.3 ft

2 inches

pH5.90

DESIGNATION: T2

WELL VOLUME 2.6 qals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 10-31-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY13 C 209

NOTES : Purged

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME084509151035

2 gpm for for 7

WELL/SAMPLE

47.51 ft

243 ft

6 inches

PH7.577.477.38

minutes for total of 14 gals.

DESIGNATION: R3D ||

WELL VOLUME 285 aals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 11-01-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY11 C 12110.5 10711.0 112

NOTES : Pumped

1DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME09350950

7.5 gpm for 110 minutes for total of 825 gals.

WELL/SAMPLE

28.65 ft

118 ft

6 inches

pH9.9310.44

DESIGNATIONS R3S

WELL VOLUME 129 qals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 11-01-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10.5 C 12711 127

NOTES: Pumped one well volume (129 gals) until dry.

Page 12: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

\ WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: T3 ||

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME

19.08 ft WELL VOLUME 6 aals

28 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

4 inches DATE PURGED 11-01-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY5.94 11 C 1165.67 12 104

NOTES : Purgeduntil dry.

1.25 gpm for 7 minutes for total of 8.75 gals

| WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: T4 ||

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME133413411355

10.50 ft WELL VOLUME 6 qals

21.5 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

4 inches DATE PURGED 11-01-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY5.53 12 C 1124.99 12 1035.10 12 90

NOTES : Pumped 1 gpm for 21 minutes for total of 21 gals.

f '• '. ' •••'•• ;l: i' -;: WEIiIi/SAKPLB/' DESIGNATION '' ' |

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME145615301555

15.50 ft WELL VOLUME 187 aals

150 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 11-01-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY6.51 10.5 C 1505.92 11 836.17 11 85

NOTES: Pumped at 10 gpm for 59 minutes of total of 590 gals,

AR30I2M

Page 13: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

| WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: R6

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME

14.50 ft

248 ft

6 inches

pH7.395.88

WELL

PURGE

DATE

TEMP10 C11

VOLUME 335 aals

METHOD Pump

PURGED 11-02-90

CONDUCTIVITY11274

NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry.

f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5

DEPTH

TOTAL

WELL

TO WATER

DEPTH

DIAMETER

TIME1140 •12071220

9.76 ft

250 ft

6 inches

pH6.176.206.21

WELL

PURGE

DATE

TEMP11 C1111

VOLUME 353 aals

METHOD Pump

PURGED 11-02-90

CONDUCTIVITY747574

NOTES: Pumped at 10 gpm for 106 minutes of total of 1060 gals.

Page 14: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL SAMPLING DATA

AR30l2if3

Page 15: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME132913491410

NOTES : Purged410 gals.

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME135514001405

NOTES : Bailed

f, ::,,:,,,.,;DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME143214411448

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATIONS R1S |

12.96 ft WELL VOLUME 131 aals

103.0 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 12/03/90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY6.62 9 3406.58 11 440

11 430

at 10 gpm for approximately 41 minutes or total of

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION* • tfi&'& .y;---' • '.. ||

11.90 ft WELL VOLUME 1.14 qals

17.7 ft PURGE METHOD Bailer

2 inches DATE PURGED 12-03-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY6.56 10 4104.95 11 - 4155.00 11 413

total of 4 gals.

':& ''WBM,/S&Wjy:i:! BBS GNATIOIJ ^ ' ' ; f

11.85 ft WELL VOLUME 1.50 qals

21..0 ft PURGE METHOD Bailer

2 inches DATE PURGED 12-03-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10 1059 1709 110

NOTES: pH meter wet, not working. Bailed total of 4 gals,

Page 16: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

| WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: RID ||

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION RID

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME

"20 ft WELL VOLUME

244 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 12

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY

NOTES: After 1 HP pump lost in well R1.1A, only 1/2 HP could beused in this well. Pump could only be set to 100' depth,Purging not continuous.

1 WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: R1.1B ||

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME094810191049

13.93 ft

184.5 ft

6 inches

pH5.565.605.90

WELL VOLUME 254 aals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-03-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10 11011 9010 92

NOTES : PurgedPump was lost

1DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME103610401048

at 6.5 gpm for 61 minutes for total of 396.5 gals.in well after purging complete-no sample collected.

WELL/ SAMPLE

12.25 ft

14.5 ft

2 inches

pH5.575.475.46

DESIGNATIONS Tl. IB

WELL VOLUME 0.37 aals

PURGE METHOD Bailer

DATE PURGED 12-03-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY9 6510 6510 60

NOTES: Bailed total of 1.5 gals.

Page 17: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATIONS R1.1A

DEPTH TO WATER _________ WELL VOLUME

TOTAL DEPTH 204 ft PURGE METHOD.

WELL DIAMETER 6 inches DATE PURGED

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY

NOTES: Pump stuck in well. Abandoned after numerous attempts toremove it. No sample collected.

| WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION? Tl»IA ||

DEPTH TO WATER 13.60 ft WELL VOLUME 1.25 gala

TOTAL DEPTH 15.45 ft PURGE METHOD Bailer

WELL DIAMETER 4 inches DATE PURGED 12-03-90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY1508 - 9 120

NOTES: Bailed well until dry. Removed total of 0.75 gals.pH meter not working.

'" : ; "'"'-'-' :':v:' ;'WBLI»ySftMP -;y— -• • • -• — _u .... • * -—————————-r—-_—-—.-! _ ._ -

DEPTH TO WATER 9.04 ft WELL VOLUME 185 gals

TOTAL DEPTH 136.5 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

WELL DIAMETER 6 inches DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TIME pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY1517 9.26 7 C 1401602 8.30 8 1401630 8.56 10.5 140

NOTES: Pumped 7 gpm for 73 minutes for total of 511 gals. Pumpedthrough carbon cannister. Readings taken of filtered water.

Page 18: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

rfELL DIAMETER

TIME132913341339

WELL/ SAMPLE

3.2 ft

19.3 ft

2 inches

pH6.586.626.47

DESIGNATION: T2 |

WELL VOLUME 2.6 qals

PURGE METHOD Bailer

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10 C 2509.5 25510.5 260

NOTES : Purged

IDEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME105612451440

1 gpm for for 10 minutes for total of 10 gals.

WELL/SAMPLE

47.85 ft

243 ft

6 inches

pH7.198.848.86

DESIGNATION: R3D

WELL VOLUME 285 aals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10 C10.210.4

NOTES : Pumped806.4 gals.

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME12351307

average of 3.6

WELL/SAMPLE

30.00 ft

118 ft

6 inches

pH9.9310.44

gpm for 224 minutes for total of

DESIGNATIONS R3S r 1 i; ||

WELL VOLUME 129 aals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10.5 C 18411 206

NOTES: Pumped 165 gals until dry.

Page 19: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

t - • '" : : : • • ' ;'• ':•• • :-.' • '|,

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME114011471157

WELL/SAMPLE

19.20 ft

28 ft

4 inches

pH7.316.206.02

DESIGNATIONS T3 |J

WELL VOLUME 6 aals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10.9 14611.8 15812.2 142

NOTES : Purgeddry.

[:'• ':; ;'••"• •.'•••V ' '•'•:>

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME122512371250

1.5 gpm for 8 minutes for total of 12 gals until

WELL/SAMPLE

10.50 ft

21.5 ft

4 inches

pH5.425.405.25

DESIGNATIONS T4 |

WELL VOLUME 6 gals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY11 C 7311 7011 68

NOTES : Pumped 1 gpm for 25 minutes for total of 25 gals.

[•-•••'••• •

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME102011251140

18.50 ft

150 ft

6 inches

pH5.706.406.43

WELL VOLUME 187 gals

PURGE METHOD Pump

DATE PURGED 12-04-90

TEMP CONDUCTIVITY10 C 6010 6510 65

NOTES: Pumped at 7 gpm for 80 minutes of total of 560 gals.

ARSONS

Page 20: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

[ WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: R6 ||

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME0910

9.10 ft WELL VOLUME 335 aals

248 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 12-05-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY8.35 9 C 546.80 9 606.31 10 60

1550 6.26 9 60

NOTES: Pumped total of 233 gals. Used 1/2 HP pump. Cord onpump only 100 long. Could not set pump > 115 ft w/ Ext. Cord.

| WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: R5 |]

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME090309401010

8.53 ft WELL VOLUME 353 aals

250 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 12-04-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY8.91 10 C6.90 9.7 2806.94 10.1 150

NOTES: Pumped at 10 gpm for 107 minutes of total of 1070 gals.

| WEUk/SAMPLE DESIGNATION: T5

DEPTH TO WATER

TOTAL DEPTH

WELL DIAMETER

TIME08550930

11.52 ft WELL VOLUME 4.55 aals

18.49 ft PURGE METHOD Pump

6 inches DATE PURGED 12-13-90

pH TEMP CONDUCTIVITY5.55 11.2 2406.50 9.7 240

NOTES: Pumped dry twice for total of 9 gals.

Page 21: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

8R3Q/250

Page 22: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

|, , - : >.:';.'••.-....- - '.'•'•• WELL DATA SHEET j

Date: 12/12/90 Residence: Helen Shaffer Samole #: 05Address: Box 53. Tannersville. PA 18372Directions: corner of 715 and Camel back Road

Phone: (717) 629-0382 Owner? Yes x NoWell Construction: Drilled x Duo SoringDepth: Unknown Date Installed: ~1950Well Casing: Plastic Steel x Unknown

Other:Other:

Driller's Name: UnknownOther:

Household Plumbing: Copper x Plastic __ Cast Iron ___ Lead ___Water Treatment: Particulate Filter __ Neutralizer __ Softener __ Carbon FilterComments: ___no filter • _________________________________________Sketch location of house, wells, septic, and other features:

Complaints: T0.S0

Previous AnalyComments:

^ DRIVEWAY \ j&h-•K

o VX

SHAFFERRESIDENCE

CHURCH

WELL

C A M E L B A C K R O A D

1

istesiortainsther

sis: By:Bacteria

nonenonenone

unknown Date: 1988- none detected

SAMPLING INFORMATION

Samole 1: BL-RW-Shaffer Time: 1230Water Purging:Sample Drawn FComments:

Began Unti 1 : From Where?rom: kitchen sink

Page 23: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL DATA SHEET

Date: 12/10/90_______ Residence: Best Western________ Sample #: 02Address: Ramesh Patel. Best Western Hill Motor Lodge. Tannersvllle. PA 18372______Directions: on Route 715. across from Exxon Station____________________

Phone: (717) 629-1667_____ Owner? Yes x No ___ Other: _____________Well Construction: Drilled x Dug ___ Spring ___ Other: ____________Depth: "200' Date Installed: "1963______ Driller's Name: not knownWell Casing: Plastic ___ Steel x Unknown ___ Other: ____________Household Plumbing: Copper x Plastic __ Cast Iron ___ Lead ___Water Treatment: Particulate Filter __ Neutralizer __ Softener __ Carbon FilterComments: no filters_________________________________________Sketch location of house, wells, septic, and other features:

WELL 111

ROOMS |

O SEPTIC

ROOMS 1 WELL

D SEPTIC RPST ufpsTmu

°ROOMS* 1 HILL MOTOR LODGECH SEPTIC

R O U T E 715

c

2nd building has well 1n front at end of building.1st and 3rd building served by well at top of hill.

Complaints: Tastes noneOdor noneStains noneOther _____

Previous Analysis: By: Hess Environmental Labs____________ Date: November 1990Comments: microbiological testing___________________________________

SAMPLING INFORMATION

Sample f: BL-RW-WESTERN_______________ Time: 1145Water Purging: BeganSample Drawn From:

Until:kitchen sink in hotel office

From Where?

Comments:

Source of Information: Robert Paul

Page 24: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL DATA SHEET

Date: 12/10/90______ Residence: ____Mobile Gas Station Sample #: 03Address: Owner; Lloyd No! an____Box.31.1. Stroudsburq. PA 18360______________Directions: On Route 715 across from access ramp to Interstate 80______________

Phone; (717) 421-1800 Owner? Yes x No Other;Well Construction: Drilled ___ Dug ___ Spring ___ Other: ________________Depth: ______ Date Installed: __________ Driller's Name: __________Well Casing: Plastic ___ Steel ___ Unknown ___ Other: _____________Household Plumbing: Copper _____ Plastic __ Cast Iron ___ Lead _____Water Treatment: Particulate Filter _ Neutral1zer _ Softener _ Carbon Filter _ NoneComments: Owner contacted but has not provided any information on well_________Sketch location of house, wells, septic, and other features:

ROCK WALL

9 WELL

PUMPS MOBILSTATION

R O U T E 715

Complaints: Tastes NoOdor NoStains NoOther No

Previous Analysis: By: ________________________________ Date:Comments: Answers provided by employees of station ____________

SAMPLING INFORMATION

Sample *: _______________________ Time: 1410Water Purging: Began ________ Until: _______ From Where?Sample Drawn From: ___Sink in back room_______________________Comments: _____________ __

Page 25: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

WELL DATA SHEET

Date: 12/10/90______ Residence: Thirsty Camel Restaurant Sample #: 01Address: Co-owner; Keith Kempinsld RRll. Box II. Tannersville. PA 18372______Directions: Approximately 1/4 mile from Route 715 on Camelback Road__________

Phone: (717) 629-5182 Owner? Yes x No ___ Other: _Well Construction: Drilled ___ Dug ___ Spring ___ Other: _Depth: ______ Date Installed: __________ Driller's Name:Well Casing: Plastic ___ Steel ___ Unknown ___ Other: _Household Plumbing: Copper ___ Plastic __ Cast Iron ___ Lead ___Water Treatment: Particulate Filter _ Neutralizer _ Softener _ Carbon Filter _ NoneComments: Did not have any information on well_________________________Sketch location of house, wells, septic, and other features:

& WELL

THIRSTYCAMEL

RESTAURANT

PARKING

AREA

APARTMENTBLDQ.

C A M E L B A C K R O A D

Note: Both apartment building and restaurant served by same well.

Complaints: Tastes NoOdor NoStains NoOther No

Previous Analysis: By: ______________________________ Date:Comments: ______________ ___ ___ _________

SAMPLING INFORMATION

Sample I: BL-RW-CAMEL_________________ Time: 1130Water Purging: Began ________ Until: _______ From Where?Sample Drawn From: Sink behind bar____________________Comments: ______________________

Page 26: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

L W E L L DATA SHEETU—— -—-—.— , ——

Date: 12/10/90________ Residence: Robert C. Riday______ Sample f: 04Address: RD 3. Box 3327. Stroudsburq. PA 18360__________Directions: approximately 1/8 mile east of Butz Landfill site on North Road. Reeders. PA

Phone; (717) 629-5178 Owner? Yes x No Other;Well Construction: Drilled x Dug ___ Spring ___ Other: ____________________Depth: 125' Date Installed: 1965_____ Driller's Name: Unknown ________Well Casing: Plastic x Steel ___ Unknown ___ Other: ________________Household Plumbing: Copper x Plastic __ Cast Iron ___ Lead ___Water Treatment: Particulate Filter __ Neutralizer __ Softener __ Carbon FilterComments: no filter___________________________________________Sketch location of house, wells, septic, and other features:

R O U T E 715

DRIVEWAY

RIOAYRESIDENCE

SEPTIC|——[TANK

Complaints: Tastes noneOdor noneStains noneOther none

Previous Analysis: By: EPA________________________ Date: Hay 1987Comments: No TCE detected____________________________________

SAMPLING INFORMATION

SaMple #: BL-RN-RIDAY_________________ Time: 1630Water Purging: Began ________ Until: _______ From Where?Sample Drawn From: kitchen sink________________________Comments: _______________________________________________

Page 27: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

Page 28: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

58301257

Page 29: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

DEPTH LITHOLOGYffeet below top of casing) _______

0-20 Overburden (Cased Off)20-34 Sandstone34-50 Shale50-59 Sandstone59-71 Shale71-92 Sfltstone92-100 -Sandstone

Casing Stickup * 4.3'

Kelt KM

DEPTH LITHOLOGY(feet below top of casing) ______

0-105 Overburden (Cased Off)105-116 Sandstone116-144 Siltstone144-149 Sandstone149-175 Siltstone175-184 Sandstone184-204 Siltstone204-208 Sandstone208-244 Siltstone

Casing Stickup = 1.4'

AR301258

Page 30: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Well R1.1A

DEPTH(feet below too of

0-2020-2828-4848-5858-8080-8585-106106-118118-125125-136136-158158-166166-184184-196

LITHOLOGYcasino)

Overburden (CasedShale

SiltstoneInterbedded Shale and

ShaleSandstoneShale

'SiltstoneShale

SandstoneShale

SiltstoneShale

SandstoneCasing Stickup = 2'

Off)

Siltstone

| Well R1.1B

DEPTH(feet below top of

0-2020-3434-4444-5860-7474-114114-132132-182

LITHOLOGYcasinq)

Overburden (CasedShale

SiltstoneShale

SandstoneShale

SandstoneShale

Casing Stickup = 4.3'

Off)

: .. j -- . ii :0 --iiriFiB?- .,,;r;::;-::-::,r,V: . : "'- • |DEPTH

(feet below top of0-2020-114114-134

LITHOLOGYcasinq)

Overburden (CasedShale

SiltstoneOff)

Casing Stickup - 1.8'

5R3QJ259

Page 31: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

l' \:'?1-: :; :A:.--°'::- '' -'^•••:-' ; • wen. RSS ':•••.. . v-; -V;: --- ;•-••' ••

DEPTH(feet below too of

0-4242-103

LITHOLOGYcasinq)

Overburden (Cased Off)Shale

Casing Stickup = 0.8'

••. :> : • * ' . . ' " '' :' : • '•:: ''•••'•' " <"•'•. ; ' ' • Wel 1: R3B ' '• ;;;:/ •• •/ : '. . :*:'f r^ • • • - , : . •

DEPTHCfeet below top of

0-107107-134134-166166-175175-184184-208208-216216-226226-243

LITHOLOGYcasino)

(Cased Off)Shale

SiltstoneSandstoneShale

Si Hstone/SandstoneShale

SandstoneShale

Casing Stickup = 2.8'

i-«i.-..'-" ..:::.r.v:;;:i":::''-:-:;' it?iMiiM!i3l*V & \;• • • • • • . . . • • .;• , • •;.;•••: :j-:: :---;-;-¥->;::j:;K-: ',:••• -i;-:-:1-. '!••:. V-V'' Wfl'.P-. WfS*f;.. : ':••• :. :.:.w-:v.;..;:-..':.:-:«j;. . y.. ...:?:-:':::.;;;:-.?-". '•• • ••••.• :•.•••• .••••:• : |

DEPTHffeet below too of

0-2020-2424-3232-4444-7272-102102-110110-138138-149

LITHOLOGYcasino)

Overburden (Cased Off)SiltstoneShale

SiltstoneSandstoneSiltstoneShale

SiltstoneShale

Casing Stickup - 1.31

Page 32: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

| Well R5

DEPTH(feet below top of

0-2020-4545-6060-8484-9090-114114-122122-188188-194194-208208-216216-226226-243

LITHOLOGYcasinq)

Overburden (Cased Off)SiltstoneSandstoneShale

SiltstoneShale

.SiltstoneShale

SandstoneShale

SandstoneShale

Siltstone

Casing Stickup =1.1'

|| Hell R6 |

DEPTH(feet below top of

0-2020-3838-5454-9292-110110-128128-138138-168168-192192-207207-244

LITHOLOGYcasinq)

Overburden (Cased Off)Shale

SandstoneShale

SiltstoneShale

SandstoneShale

Si 1 tstone/SandstoneShale

Siltstone

Casing Stickup =1.6'

3R30I26!

Page 33: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

AR30I263

Page 34: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U - Not detected. The associated number indicates approximatesample concentration necessary to be detected.

(NO CODE) - Confirmed identification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported inlaboratory or field blanks.

R * Unreliable result, Analyte may or may not be present in thesample. Supporting data necessary to confirm result.

N * Tentative identification. Consider present. Special methodsmay be needed to confirm its present or absence in futuresampling efforts.

CODES RELATED TO QUANTITATION(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitatlon limits):

J = Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate orprecise.

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actualvalue is expected to be lower.

L = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actualvalue is expected to be higher.

UJ 3 Not detected, quantitatlon may be inaccurate or imprecise.UL = Not detected, quantitatlon limit is probably higher.

OTHER CODES

Q > No analytical result.D = Compound Identified In an analysis at a secondary dilution

factor.X * Additional flags defined separately.

flR3QI263

Page 35: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

GROUND-WATER - ROUND 1

Page 36: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

!o°= a,

-a -ac c3 10

13 0) <->01 -C ITJ

——

•4-> O01a >* i

—' OO CO

ooaoooo-oooooooooooooooooooooooo1- cj

—* OlO LO aooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoaooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooam LUH- CJ

CM *-• —t

—' COoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CM LU

oCO r— * LO

O

is

ao to

H- CJ

|Qu

u

3333333QS33-33333=13-3333 = 3 = ia33 =oooooaoooooooooaooooooaoooooooaoooaaoaoooaooooooooooooooooooodoooooo• • • - - • •

CM —« «-• CO CM

: 2ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.oe

ooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

3=>§000000000000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooo

3T T T33-333333 3333330333"^ 33 3-3

gooooaoooooooocaooooooooooooaoooogoOOOOOC3OOOOOOOC3OC3OOOOOOOC3OOOOOOOOO

-3 33333330£33T333:333 33333303333 33 3-3

> m oooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOacSIOOOOOOCMOOOOOOCOOOOOOOoacO

C31 —I . ^ O!

_J t J —« -» -* C31 ^ 3 -*?ot en—^<*^^"^—j " * ***. ^ *—* "*«. *~* otc 3 _i _i _i en en at en _i — 41 e—— H>~--^-»-..a) 3 3 ^3 O I 3 - - . - J S 01f en en en 3 *— —* —i «—• c *—* en -». at &*•—*Ol 4-1 1} 3 2 3 «M* -«. <q 3 en £ o «j ^»

« S o £ c c e S — —.1 5 ^ ''u'cn —«"cnQ.-c ^ o> S"Si2 ."CTp J: o £ j: a • .~*.+± oj_i3 — ' ."Si ^oi~o —•£—^S^ i c "~* «

I 30J^O *» i j-i i r* t* t* n\ HI 1-1

i"* o -- CM '— m a 41 *—

<J

'ul7ujc!cSjEio'--'~"~'"5S4JC>i2iol4Joti°"S = ~-~H - C M H M U U U U C C 9 H Q ) O I " ~ O O ) ^O>4»eC*)OV(UO1^01*>^X—*O«CCJi .1— . - — <a<o.cc:c~o<t-j|ecoooo -g^'— cue i— ^_

^^301265

Page 37: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•oIat

-a «« °V -C flu o1-1 Oa »,

4-> IW —— I— C(J (J

o 3 oooooooooooooooooooaoooooaaoooaooaI H- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O*r ujQ£ O

Of*. — _ _ — _ _ - — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooaooooo_ ooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooom uu

01 CJc*i " *-*

o to _ _ _ _ _ _ _i to oaoooooooooooooaaoooooooooooooooaot/i h- ooooooooooooQOooooooooooooooooooao1 LU:« - . . . - . . . - _ . . . . -. . . ^^

a coCM LUC£ O

OCO r-. CO• t——

•-4 UJce u

< to•~4 CO

ss

O CM

!£o _ _"": o

a

d

caC

oooooaooooaaooooooaooaooaaooooooaaooaoooooooooooooaaoooaoooaaooooooo

cn

^ T "-a ^=9333333O2333333333=3333333CQ333 33 33aoaOOOOOOOOaOOOaaaaaaaOOaOOaoaaoaaO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a a O O O O O O O O O O O

CO— 4*^

33333330:333333333333333303333 33 3 ZJ§ § g § § § g § g § § g § § g § § § g g g g o o o o o o o o o g o oc3oooooooooooooooooodoooo^rc3OOLnooooo

;»ooooaooooaoaooooooaaooooooocaoooo

CM Or^» ^

03

33333333o£333333333'?333333ca333 33 3~]Sooooooaoooaoaoooaoooooooooooaoaoaoooaoooaooooooooooooooooooooooooo

. LU »-: u a. ooooaoooaoooooooo^oooooOLnaaoooooo^r•4»^»4^-«*^^^^-«GMCMC\lCM^^^^*^CSJ*^'H CM^HCM^4<^*-*<-4*^*-^*^'-4^<<>^^CM

^ CM

_ ^;=! "Si i1'"v O» 3

— « «-« . — . CT-— • 3 *—

«i ^ < -^ - ~~ »>01 cn 01 a i _ i ^ > u e3 3 —.3 a) 3 -^ _i s <a.e — • ai ^. « a.< —fO 3 O» f Q -^-_ _ _ _ _ _ a) a> aiai — —- ex a; —• 3 •*-» -» u * -—• 535 u c c —. 3-3 _i— _i o c —. ~- OJ-JGLOI-I^.u x: u w u c o - _i — •— ^ _i ->>uio_tji a -~» o 3 01w^^See- —"-C JS - uoi^»—.ois.^-^2 aj uoiu—.oi_3_u u w ^ i ^ j - M U c n o t c —* -> g « •—• — .c •*-* o» o e *— o ^ Ji —* .c ^ c: w

"o « "o o jj o cy a) CM i" i1-? " ^ § « i S ^ ^ ^_CM 1— C — 1'~"^l2^ci)^§c3_'^~-"*"-^:^

i *i '—•«••••• ••-iqia.cge'atfe-liecoooo •6J(^I~"C

0) CM 3 3 -= ~SSJSSe_J'S— S~3U 31 5 I jj _i Og^.——-g g5;r.« =•= ?•« = •= y «->^--<M-r^ P u

i CM CM CD z x 4) c a o S t. u •— •—>—•— « -Q j: -w >,*!•—**« «— c e• > -i i i uui-'-i-iQa.c.c.c.c-— — 4 j u * j _ o o o i - u — —

flR30i266

Page 38: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

OSOJ

T3 13i iO -I IU I13 M I

•MC 3 0)

T3 0) +44-» 44 u aaj H- »•" O

— Cu o

0)_H en 4JO !•» HII >— 10

ao uj ~a

O CO

a. <

u

u

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooo^ooooooooooooo^oooooooo

ooaocpooooaoaoooooooooooaoaooooooaooaooaooooooooooooaoooooaoaoooooooo

§8§§gg§§§g§ggg§§§§§§S§§§§§S§§i§§§§

oooooooooaooooaooooooooooaoopooaooooooooaaoooooaoaoooooaoooooooooooo

0> _1 —» Ol-~ 3—« -«x O> 3_I«-»_J ^_^ —— —» —• Ol'— ^ ——

01 ai 01 ai _i — 4> <=a) <-> aj 3 3 3 ~- ""' ""* - * la""" 3 o> j: __^ o —»Jg«'"-'~"~'a» c c -^3"o_j-~ ~ o c —• •— u _i a. oi_i -^

^ ^ S) Q) 0} C Q |Q « ^ " ** J ^ (• 2 ^ 1 O * O 3 * O)

U O I ( J O O O O 8 l d ) C S J 3 3 ' ~ "^ it)<044M4ji.C"l-'~4> 3 U 3 I 41, I 4J44Q

"tevi*vl????'3SS*'Sill5jiooooTi-'>iJ:fc-t.3'ioioco'>(>.

Page 39: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

iae OJ

G

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011,

3 10 Ig_l •13 M tU

•a•a a)X -c<a

• M O BQ) gja >i co4-1

« —— I

o>,

an o

-H oO tO

•J

CM UJt— ej

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 = 333333333CO r*..-« in• l—--» LUi— cj

o rri to

(J

33333333333333333333333333333333 = 3333oooooQOQQOoooooQOOQOoooaoaooaoooaoooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooaoooooooSoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooo o" o;s

-3§000000000009000000000000000000000000ooooooooooooooooooooooooOOoooooooSoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo'o'oo'ooooooao<—* ••• ••< ~-« Ul " •-* —-« LD ••"« •—* ~ •*« —* ~ U"> •—• C\4 VO J"J —-« ^ —•* — ~ t/1 Ul —« —-t —-» —« i- —l »-« «~< yj __«

aoooQoooooooQooooooooooooooooooQooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

8 8 8 8 8 § § § 88888888888888888888888888888o'o'o'o'do'oo'o'ooooooooooooooooooooooooooad

oooooooooooooooooi-*_4_<-Htn — —<~4in~*»-* — *>*~*>-4in~< oooooooooaoooaaooo

3a== = = = =} = ===>33=: = =>==l = =l==)3 = 352=9 = =)=> = =)32=)§000000000000000000000000000000000000ooaoooooooooooooooooooooaaoooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooaooooaoooooooooo

o m> in aoaooaaooooooooooooaooooaoooooaooooooca »— oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooH-U ooooooQooooQooooQoooooooooo'oooooooornd

ooaoaooooooaoooooooooooooooooaoQaaooaoooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooociooooooaoooooooaooooooooooooooooaoo

W ** *"" CT-^ —• 3 at—i 301—~«- -». __^ ai •*- 3 u _i_i_j3 -^ _j _i 01 01—^—* •-•-•-— -u ^i 3 o u *-^ a; , —* *^ ^. «^'^-v.'>»33j_j-~_jj>x->. —• cu £ -J oioiaiOIOIOI-' —— —,^,_J-».-»ai Ol <U £.'— *> ~~ 333

0) 3 3 3 Ol Ol~~. Ol Ol 3 3 OI.C4JO.-~IU Ol —• ~— ——C —" '-*'— l— 3 3 Ol 3 3 —— —. —».—. C —"^^Jj C -J "" """" _^ "^ ,'~" <u —'

_ - .-«* _ -|^-C£gj33)33oiN34Jdl^ ««^ x: 3 3 Of!>*. 3 -—* C 3 -C " J2 * 3: a v v •— *-*•— —"*- 3 c —• v >* a*——^ 3 pi*** —i 01 •—^ *-* >i «-» 01—>

cj p o b ~c5.~a..c o O 4 J Q 4 - » o c ' — oceM^"32'—>iQC'— C3i-c(-a.t- o

4J 4J 4J t 4-* A O ^ ^ ^ ^^ 4*4 n J l Q ^ O O O O O O ^- - - -t i * »t i i i i .c .c at at •—•'-• •«-! t_£^^aj — "-e; 0) u-w c c c c c c c

SR3QI268

Page 40: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

T3

I

1.T3 01 —01 -C OU I

a) olo >.</i•4-J

i— C Iu u

o _>i

goooooooooooaooooooooooooooOOoooooooooooooooooooooo.oooooooooooaoooooooooooooooodo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O— — — — -loooooooooo — - — ~ — - --1='-^'--O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O' O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooaooooooooooaoooaooocaoooo— — oooooooooo — — _ ^ _ ^ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _O O O O Q O O O O O a o O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O Ooooocjooooooooooaoooaooadoooo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OOOOOOGOOOOOOOOOOO.OOOOOOOOOOOO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooaooooooaoooooooooooo0000000000000000000000000000ocjooooooooejoooooodoooooooooo

3333=33 3O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00.0o'oo'o'odo'doddoo'ooo'odoo'oooooooo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

d d d d d d d d d d o' d d d d o d d d d d o o o d o o d

= 3 = = 333 = 3 = = 33333333333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O^aooooao^oo^o^ooooooooaoooaod o d d d o d d d d d d o d d d d d d o d d o d d d o d

— » o<o> -~_j -i at v — o c33« -J . — »3— — JC •—

^ i— •— _c o> u *j 01 c*j— iO'T)4->34-><a3-^aj^I 3i£ — • £ — — » a> a> ••- ai— »c<ai5UO)0)3>>*jn— CQ. uiaaj—i—ioao^:

3a.Q.^«-C*JC3-QJ3<j•i— •— .i.«ifa)< — ooo>. nj 3 j: a-2 u u i. u . c - o o a i N Oqj j jj ..(S a o o o —« A O N M >

Page 41: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•ac30as

<Ui -*->i- V)(U4-t -

*C11 ,3 fl 10_, ,

IS N 014-J ~

C 3 —— CO 4JT3 11) r0) £ O4J 4-1 :»U 1

ts ° i

Chem

ical

s 0

he V

icin

ity

— S

4-14-a cs_

CO

• COO CO1 H-

QE£ u

O f"«»

O 'QI COc/">

— • ena coi >—O£ O

fHO1CD *r*— i (O

• h—P*f C_J

0

. H-

O£ C_3

1—4a cu1 COa >—

0)4-1

o r*. uI H- •»-r^ e_i Q_

%

TlU

O

gooo^oooooooooaaooooooooooooooooaoooooooaoooooooaaaaooaooaaacDaOaaaoaaoaoa^ooooooooaooooooaoooooooooooaooaooooo

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g i g gooooooooooaooaoaooooaoaaooaaoooaoaaaa

ooooaaaoooooooooaaaoooaoooooooaoaaooaooooooooaooaoooooooooooooooooooaoooooaoaooooooaoaooaoooooooaoooaaooooaaooo

ggooooooooooooooogoooooooooooogooooogooooooooaoooooaaaoooooaaoooooooaoooao

= = = =1 = =, = =33 = = = = =, = = = 3 = = = = = = = 3 = = = =. = = =,=, = =,=g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g gaaaaaaoaoooaoaoooaooooooooaoooooooooo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOC3OC3OC3OOOOOOOOOOOC3^OC3OOaOOOOOOOOOO

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

§000000000000000000000000000000000000oooooooooooooooaoooooooaooooooooooaooooaooooooooooooaoooooooaooooaoooaooa

— i — • —i"CT - 01

—~ —* 3 Ol— 1 3_j — ^^ _J «— 3 *--^« — 1 — 4 ^-» ^— ' Ql • — •— --*5 ^ ^ - k ^ ^-. ^-^ C 3 » ^ " 3 U _J_J_I

«J _J «J O» C3I - — ^^ ^ _J 3 O U -* 0) — * ~^ . *^— '~^^-«^33_j_i — _ i _ i ~ » - » — cm ^ -i cnoncnCl O* C3> -* *"* *» " ^ »J ' " Ul CT1 01 *C ™ 4J " 333

Ol 3 3 3 Ol Ol^ O 1 O I 3 3 1) £ 4J O — » 01 Ol •— <— — •§ 00^*-- 3-i-T. -J -1 J —— -5 jrS- S §<>,_* . _| 0.^ | U g^^

O C C C O O Q J ( U C Z I 3 i p <O ^^ QJ S & ^ 5) i ^^ 3 "^^ CJ C t» C 3tv d) QJ QJ W ^ fi 03 >mm *"" g ~ g r™» Q) gi fl) | | +J g; (•" P"" Q) ^ Q) Ol <Q 3J (Q <U 'O ^ ""o^^-aooo.a.-coo-MO-MOC'— oces*'— §^>*^<='~ c 3 u e u ja L. oO O O O U O O ^ S u u ^ X l f l ^ ^ ' - S ' — U « c O C J Z ^ ' - W « > » < U C > t ' — •"— U^U

H- (J U O f— K- O g C "c C U t. >i »> O O "- O CO UC.U >iO OJ^jC U n3 <0-Q CTJ^ U, . . - ( , . .2 -. — o o^£ t. t. a t- — g o o a-c J- <- a.a.fl— — — »— • •»- — -^.???ulto.?????22mi;^.t:.'.-?!222|SzS2|SSSSS|S>

Page 42: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

"SI ,3 nj i

32ct c_)

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoaoooooooooaaooooooaoo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

n3333333O3r33ZDO33333Z3Or3 33O3'~3O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oooooooooooooooaooooooooooooaoo'oo'o'o'od o' o o a" o o o o o o o" o o" o u-) a o a" O r^

3:O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '

— l O O O O O O O O O O O 1ooaooaooaooooaoooooooooooooooaoooooooooooaooooooo^oocJoo

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ooo^ooo^oooooooooaooaoaooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

C 3 "-— CO-i-'

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OooooooooooooooooooooooooooooO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oa >> t/i ~«^.^.-«-*.-4,—1-^—*^~-,—t—t^.-*-^^.-*^^^.

•MW — I

g§gilggl§§gg§§g§i§i§igg§g§i

ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggioooooooQ

~ —I ' 3 ^. Ol_l ~— "-. —•_J '^x • — ' O I 3 - - » OIU"Si_)G'il _ i o i - 2 . 3" ^_^ c~£*—* Ol Ol ^ «) —1 Ol 0) ~-* 0) C —1 -C U 0) '—

<o aiuo^^a-^-^ —' at -M 3 > '"I «-.»-—» —• a) D..C

W "^ « ffl -M 3 *J t» 3 *-~ O J " O O C --^t-COI3C3 £^OXj; _1 JS C "-^ *O<— —( fs( (13 •— <OUOIQ.O>3—-'4>»—' + J * J « XQ.- . 4-. *J fl "•!« ~ » C < - " O J : i 3 l £ — — £ «-.»-« II JJ — 0)o)oi.c.c-^c«9.ci>oio)3>i-M<'n«^ca. <ua.a)_i_iooo-cc 3 .r ^^-g-ggg^J.-gggg-----^

. __: ^ u u u - c - a o i u i x o u a a — — — si__ _ti— w o) o o o o-« o i M1— G'—si—*~'SiJzs:+*o O1— >*c c1— •— •— '— "^ u o o i t i a i ^ - M uuuuj-•-•---4).c.e.c.eoout..c.aoe'— «i i i i

^301271

Page 43: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•goO£

HI1 -M

t- CO<u

5 =H-

T3 "OC C 13 n3 IO —1 PU N O )

C 3 —

13"O U <—CU -C O

U 1

ts ° io o1 *62*."0 C

a"01

OJo r^ IQ1 1 — VI

ce u •—

. _ ,c

_| CM • —o r~, .a

OS CJ •—

£-^ oo r*.

o toi t—/v* j

Chemica

= ==3=> = = = = = =3 = = ====5=>3= = =.=S = =1 = = =3== = =3Z3 = = =3==>

g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

- i - 3 - 5— — ' — ' — r — I — i — J — i ^t ~J —j — i^—J—)-J^J^^-j^^-jZ)^—J-J^J-3^J-J^3^3^2^3^^i0000000000000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

3333331333333333 = 3333333331333333333333

gg g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

ggggggiggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

_l — «• _J-**. -J ^

— » — * 3 OI T 3—I - -*, _j *— 3 -s. ——O1-— »** *-»'* «^ — *» — * O» r— 3 (_ _J _l _43 -J -J — » Ol 0»— *—•• -*— . « J _ 1 3 O U —— OJ — » -^ "*-s *N.<* ' » "**.*** 3 3 _J _J — * -J _J "^ **N. ^— CM X — 1 CT 5» O» td) 3 3 Z3 Ol Cn > C31O3 3 (U .C +•• Q •• <U Ol *-~*'*~"*~'

N v v u e e '— o)'*^a*<iisfc^s._j'O'xfc>,>,£oic>^'^^*-.'^ •**. c c c — •"»*.C C C C U 41 *^ ^~ * QJ <3) C Ol C Of Ol *^ ••" Ot •£ C Q. 3 (U Ol Ot ^. _1 Ot V O) flj <U OJ — J O)J3 N N N a. a. c c*o 5 <u *—"— -*— 3 c «— "5 *>""* a.*— •*— ' 3 oi^C7aj^-*j X-M ot*-*o c c c o a j j u c s s t j ^ w ^ ^ •— *<u g a.^ U l ^ . *— » a -x.u c u c a ^O.^^^OOCi^^.OO+JO+JOC'*~OCCM^~4(''">sQC^— C 3 L. C U O. t_ O-C^^u,c.CJ->ioooa.aja.a)^—eo— oc i -^ QJ u •— e e •— +* u 3 ••- 3 •*- o

u .c £ u t- j; «•*-•*-•*- o o »~ •"• m CLU m •»- cxo O o *"• <o a.4-»+j o-^ -— . -* . «««, <ot— o o OH-H-U Me ee u t. >» >» o o — o c o t. u u >» o o u «j «9^a o> u•I 1 1 * -1 1 i 1 t .C .C OJ 0) -~* ••— - ••- i U . C _ c : . C Q ) - — " - C C . C N N N r » J N N N

^^^^csrcucJcJcsjcsjcNjc^c^e^e^e^e^eomV^^^^r^^^^C^JcaSmSS^S

Page 44: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•ocaa:1 4-»

OJ4-t ~«T3 I —

-D T3C C. \3 03 1O — 1 IU<J3 M 0}C 3 •—"~ CO -*~O rtj r—u i oU 1OJ <4- ••-• W O paj 5a >,onM ••- 1

•— C 1rt3 .t- 1U U

1*0 J=

4-t

a c

1C/J

OJ— * fO •*-»1 H> VIcn UJ cae cj •—~

"c

~ CJ *—O f^» ~QCO UJ "O

02 ° *2(4—

^ OO r-.

Q£ CJ

o to1 h—

OS U

<oU

1U

= ==== = = ==3=>3 = =3= = = = = = = = = = =3=)3§000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooooooooooaooooo

323^333330023033^20^3303:33302oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

-5

§000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

3333333333333330333003^33333

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O T O O O O O

-», — _1 Ol— • 3 01— • 0 1 — 1 - ^ . — • 3—1 —— '3

-J •>. — • Ol 3 ~x O><-•v. —**~ at - ~ 3 — »OI V 3 V 1 IOl _1 —I 3 -J 0) ^ 3 C • — •J=4->3 ** "Ss « ^ * <— * -« C 01 "-* -- <0 J-» (O^ Ol 91 ••** -J — » Ol 01 *— 0) C — J -Si t~ 01 • —

3 3 01 i ^ ^ . 3 •*- c •»- 01 *** W 0} ^ (OQ) ^ «M C "** O) Ol ^ T3 Of £C Ol OJJ^^^JZ•W a i O ) 3 3 "3 Ol U JO — 3 g«J>t-w

(uoiJij:— c^^a)oiaj3>i*jfo^CQ. D a. u _i _ iooo.eoi — ••— i— -i--i->£ti— > o o a o c s j " o j - - ' a c a i ^ a i o i a i o o o > iN >, >> 03 3 -C Q. J= U U U U - C " O O O ) N O l - 3 3 — '-— J=c ai •!-» 4-> — •«<- cf— -M a> o o o o-* 5 i <n<— s >— £— »»— £^jcw

moQQOOOOU-U-ZZZX — — ZZZZQ.O.Q.a.J3J3j3J3

Page 45: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

!"? '3 «3 WO _J CDI- O

C 3 "O— OS C

"O QJ0) .C W4-» *J 0)U T3U IV. .—•M O O

W — (U'— CO.(Q .t-U U I

a: o

—« oo <o

—4 en

^ IT!I h-CM UJ

3333333333333333333333333335 In• H-

I— U O O O O O O O O O - < — l O O O O O O O O O — l O O O O Q O

a ini tn

?s<c i—4 UJI— O

aU

oooaooaoo—. — o o o o o o o o o — o o o o

3333333333333333. 33333333333

ooooooaoo*-^^^ooooooooo*^oooooo

333333333333333333333333333

333333333333333333333333333

c o — — c o —

333333333333333333333333333

ddddddddd--—'Oododdodd—'odoodd>,*j

333333333333oouoooooooaoLnooooinuioOLnounu-iuio

_ "* "^ iaoaooaoei-^^aeiaoeieidaa^egaeiaeie)o c

133333333333333333333333333

.-^ — OLninwntntnoo— 'O — -H— • — aoinooLnoooaiidoaodddo — — 'Ooodooado — oaoado

• >» 0101 o» ^ 3 ^^ _ ^_ _i <-• _i_J » O) -~ Ol

_ _ _ O) Ol Ol Ol Ol CT O* _ Ol 3 *fl 3 «J ""^ Of ^ ^ _ ^™» j

. .CTO1O1— ItO— MCMCO^O Ol— — 00 _J C «— • UJ U. 3 3-D Ol 3 _l T3333^.«C>J«»»VO<O3 ^.O O »-•«-• t- 3 — • — • V.— ••^•^BtOCMC\JCVJCMCMCVI—>CCCgi-l-> !.(-•— O ~- O

- - -o u u t - b u u u - ^ i — <— —o c a o o o o o o i . 3 3 3 _c e u u x £ i i c o i t i

Page 46: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Io08 01L. </»0)-M *"—

3- -u— i•O "O Ic c3 "} COO —I CO

c 3 -a— DCIfl-Q 0)0» -C OT•w •*-* <Uo -asi <*- •—•M o u

Cfl — OJ•—CO.U U I

a>>

-« 03o <o

IS

23• H—

-* UJ0£ C_l

a c\jI COa »—

aooooooao—^-^oaaoooaoa — ooaoao

O O O O O O O O O — < — C3C3OOOOOC3C3-^C3OOC3OO

—'OOOOO

oooooaooa — —'Ooooooooo--.ooooao

~«—*^otnu}u">untnoo—«O"-<*-«-^—«oou">oouiooovnodaoodoao—.—toooaaoaoo — oooooo

oaooooooo—. — aooaoooo—.oo

ooooooooo—. — oooooooa—.aooooo

~ ~ o>en en —. 3 -3 3 _j —• -—» 01 ~»

41—1 3 01'en

_ _ o en 01 01 en 01 01 01 3 <o 3 ""• 01 "* ' ^ ^ "* fl_i «j _i ^ «M> *»->«• «-* -« * _j « •— en p —*^s *-.. c —J ^ c c-~,-*»v^> ^» —• 3 ~ u 3 a encnuj-v-cn—nicncncn_i<c-^CMcsjco«ro en—• — oi_jc—-uu t- 3 3^0 en 3 _j T3333^»-*CNJCO^'^'U1^3 "*^O O —"* t- 3 *—• —• U• • ^ ^ enocMCMcsicMCNjcsj *-* c c c c n ^ j u u ^ * o « acaoa~~l-Li.Li.LL~-'—'—'— .c.c>ia>mufmcouQaac^o^^^o^^^oi-sssccuox^i ^ op i i^^^•"O o o o o o o o a>'o~a"t3*o~o Q.CL-M x O.O.-M' E £

Page 47: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

T3

O

s~ insi

M- I

C C3 <C «O -J COw otO NJ A.

e la -a<a

<uS513I h- t/1cn uj ctt f1? **~u

in ujae u

a

ooooooooo — —.000000000 — oo

(j -g w» r-* i ^ootJoooaoooooLnoooovnu^oou^otjomu^o•^ ° ° n^cir— OOOOOOOOO*-4«-4^OC)OOOOOO'^^OOOOO

o u

J± di<LJ -tU-o c

ooomoooooooou^ooooLnuioou-iOLnu-iun

oc9OOooooo*^^oaoaoooao-Nodc>oo<

-.1-1—I ~v U ^. U —~» o<4-> oi- -8~>. —at s 10 3 _i — 01——» . -•»

«^ 3 •—»4_ •—'»^X3—1-J4)-1——)

» .> W -" Ol

U-l 3 U3- "O N. * C -"-

» « .010)O1_I(O— tM<MOO^-O Ol~ — U1 _l C —— UJ t.ass^^^eNjm^'ruitoa ^«o o

fc01 -1U. c

» 3_l C —— UJ t. _«—— 1-3 — ~-u•M ^ *- aiocsjCNjcacsjcxjCM *w cecDi4-iuu^~ o *-^ a3^ — «-H« — — ia i e n > 3 i u o a j = a ) u ^ - UW'-a uj i— — • i i i i i i i c u- <4- n_ >^ ^c •— .— uczjsuxsjs

3 5 C5 ^ ^ ^ !• (• W IK "™ * . ™ JZ JZ >% 01 3 U £ CES CO CJa o p » c o o o o o o o t - 3 3 3 c c u o x x : i i a a i i tI I !•*•#— -^— ^*—*—f— T3tflwBJ'^'^(9^ QflLflfli I *0*|g• - - t - o u o o c j y c j ' ~ o o o i - t - 4 - i - M - C < i 3 . c . c < d 4 - > E i l•«r •* T3 5 o o o o a o ai*a<o*a-a*a a. a. -M x a. a.*- § i. » «r— u u u u u u u - ^ - c c c e c c u < u ( u a ^ B ' M i U ( U r a < Q^^<T<<<<*<<<<<C3UJUJUJUJUJ£££>— tl 13 -O T3 O1CA

Page 48: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

"il 12*5-»Sl

155* « Iij O *0

o *i a2*

O

B

H

kiS^

^

a A fQ D 3 > J 3 f f l O O f f l 3 3 3 3 T D D flO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OC O ^ O O O O O O i - H i n u - l O O O O f N - V O O O O o a O D

c D o a n o o o o o r ^ o m o o n c N A o o o o o o r s )o c n f s * o r t ( N o m < n e N e N P i i - * o a 8 Q m r * e N < * t o « c N ^

en » co (N

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

ma D p j p m m a i a D p a r> o <nO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N O O O O O O O O

r* r* in o ^ CN

^o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

« en tn M p* p»•» .-* <n

n c o m a a a a j D B S C Q o f f l D p 3 D n 5 Do o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

r** <N o o m so

OQ D p j s o j i n a s n D a 3 D n s a• 1 •« ^3*3" _ I M i^»t^i^*^^i(!^(^iia(^^<^OQOOOOOOOOOOO

<*1 iH P4 O O t^ AnA O O rH

ffl 03 0) O Q 3 J 3 f l Q a D ^ 3 D D D ^ J D DOo a a o oo m o o mO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo e o i - t i n o o o o a p i o o e o o o d M

4B O M A <** O

Page 49: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

1*1* " •a.23 «^ -t> g^l

uiO B

S1''

ma aiat ^

Q tu2 %

o int BUS fa

Si . . . . . . . . .. = .......,, .. . . .. . o

n ino aI 04

o r * > f M t n ^ r 4 a m ( n e M n O i - t o r ^ o i * - « c * i m o n o i ( nr» ^ A tn P* enin* n « r*

2^

o•-* 3

rt

• th2^

OS

O BI Oxr* o PHa: i a

•o

U-H

O O O O O Q O O P P O O O O O O O O O O O Q P

am "^O O P O O O O Q Q O O O P P O Q O P O O O O O Oo o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o p < o o

a a a D S i j a s a a o D DBS 3 a n a D oao o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oa d p i n o d d o a o o a t p p O N Q P O o p o o c D

O

99o s s a s s t i a o o a n a a a a a i a a nO O P O O P O O P O O Q Q O O O P P P O O O O Qo p p r ^ p d p o a o p p p p p n d o p p p p p o i

o a s o o a j a a s a o a a a a n a ao o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o on a a a d p p p p p m o o o o n p p p p p p o oc « r « n i i n T - 4 c i o i n m n c 4 t ^ ^ p m o i n r 4 n m o c « 4 r i « p >

o

f f l f f l D f l a 3 9 J 3 3 3 i a f f l 3 99 3 3 O b 93 O bo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oy.fl • tu r t s t p w o o o o o o m i ' i o o o o i o p p p p o o n*5S •-•« . . . . . . t . . ........ t . . . . . .0 i** o i r « c M r t ^ i t M O i n i n « « m » H O O o » p « M p < M < M i n

91 in H IA 09p? in* r

u o a m a a ^ D a a a a a 99 a a T Is m n~ P O O O O P P P P P P P P P P O O O O P P P P Pr ^ m o 4 t o o o p p p o p o d o n o a a p p p « H i n

»-* i-t O

5o a n a a j a m a n o a 991990O P P O O O O O O O O O P O O P O P P O P P O Oc I r » f » ' » i H p » d i n < n « « i n i - i o o o i o p c « n o c J « »

r» in r» tnn n at t-Tn

AR30I278

Page 50: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

t *JM to !e•W «-l '

a -*H fii !'!"5-oe 3 5•* 0) •J «0

u *" *•5 o *• £j-< o "3

'Pi35 I*o a

-H

6-

u

^00 0

o a «1 Bu •» 5 oC£ Z

-C

f-t 1/1 Ho a a1 Bua o -a

*

in^ inO 9

S§^

^ irt0 B1 ft*in uad X

8iu

a o f f l o a D 3 3 3 3 o D a m so a p o o o o o o o o o o o o o

rtn" * " H ""p. rtN°

3 a 3 W 9 D B I 3 S 3 a 0 a 3 3 B a 3O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O

- - «» „

O D a a 9 D W i 3 D a a a ao o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

•H A% *A -I

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo « m o r > o o o o o « f O o o o o o i

m « IH rt

35. $.-3 ~ ^^-•vXitjAoi^ij^^AA^q QtQt»4

<***»g 01^3 a^-wwa^r^J^^'s

•HiB9H'H**4|'-4f**4 _ f 3 9• -*4 • -*H JN • O O • Q«S C'Q C O * U3 + J » W M f l ^ M J Ot4 0 tf 0* O M

9 0 Q 9 9 d 9 9 «O O O O O O O O

< V < S O t r r T 0 l M f N *

•9999IS99IX1O O O O O O O O

«" •«"•a a a i 5 a aO O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O

in rnin*

9 3 9 ft S 9 aO O O O O O O Oo o o o o o o c g.,-,...

^5 -j^ 0* L L *S-

v-'avv a a-*>m — tjt o» — — j

• • o • 3 M J t f 4 C > < « 4 * H * O

•H 0 W*^ S5"^

^301279

Page 51: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

GROUND-WATER - ROUND 2

280

Page 52: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CM COO CO

i XCO UJI— CJ

CSJ CMO CO

I XCSJ LUI— tj

CO CO_ to• a

-a u -M"5 J2 <«o.o ~ 2

o1^ CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ot/J X

Chem

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooaooaooooooooooooooooooooo

O C 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O-O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oooaooooooaoocaooaoooaoaoaooooaaoooa

3.3 33333 33 33oooaoooooooaoooaooooaoooooooaooooooaaaooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooo

aooaooooooaooooooooooooooaooooooooooooooocsaoaooaooooooooooeaaoooocsocDo

ooooaoooooooa oooooooooooooooooooooQ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

- . *-4. ^^ .^r^ CNJ Ul ~^ —^

3333323333333333333333303333 33 33ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

33=)333333^33333333333333333333333g ^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C Oooooooaooooooooooaoooooooooooooo

33333333333-333333 333333CS333 33 33gggggggggoggggggggggggggggggogoogo

< CT01 3

3 -J-, en 01 01 01 _i — u c

—— —— . -» Ol 3 3 ^~3 1 ) 3 ^ » _ 1 C <UJ £ o i o i o i 3 >-• — ' _i-~ c — O) —. a> a.»—41 •*•» OJ 3 3 3 *-* ^^ 13 3 Ol -C O — J *—c u e — — — a> u oiai — • ^a« • — 3 <•> •• • i. ^- _ji g O f l 0) C C ^~3tJ-J—« _1 O C — » -^ <1)_JQ.OI_I~»^ r s _ J * a i a i a ) c a <t> -j — ' •»- H _ j -**£-fO_iaj o^-^os^^oii 0 i c c c |~— . r5 ^ < «-oi--» — oi Q.J: --, -3 at u 01 i- — en 3— i _ i a o - i - > o — e 020 3^---» — . -, - —— » o i u o 3 O i _ i a o - i - > o — e 020 3_i 3 -o •- »- a^»— u i j a j - 5 ^-^---:ti — ,—.— — -c •— ' ot oe—'O'~'-c^»-c ^co£aj5££o^;^.-w <u -i ai -a •= --^ 3 - >-> u u a j- s ^^-^.u —.uouiStStSuaoic^——• 1 -— — — .c —'Oi OS —'O —.£ -~JZ J=c 01O < O O 4 l 4 l 4 i a . 3 3 4 l - J - J O O l «- O 11 3 U -— O — _ 1 * J _ 1 U M U « J O ) T 3r— u - o O O O •»-*'- CL>*s^fc.341'— < O C 4 I —* CJZt- 41£**^4t^*"- 41 ••- £ -H ••-fu^ci-ui. i oicj>ci~c3i-a)c l a u a c u o i o o i a c o w i a i -( J 4 1 O O O O O 4 1 4 1 C M 3 3 ' — (O«4-»I^<9E^"-^"41 3 W 3 I 4 1 1 41-HO.„ ._ ri -i f^- = c C I ——>-»£ S.C— 41 C -C C.UQ.C M 41——j2«-'tMi— CO O 41^-

rt«rt^rtrt-HcvjeviTr^iSoaeomcjcjucjcj(joaLuz<rtH-h-t—t—i—r—»»

Page 53: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

S o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o od o o o o o o o o o o o o o o - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -O Q O O O O O

<N in- o o o o o o o o o p o o o p p o o o o o o o o o o o o oM O O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O O O O O O O O P P

I •* o o o o o o a o o o p'p p o o p o o p o p o p o o p p o p p o pQ X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oai y i n t n t n m t n t n v n a a o o t n u r t i n o i n i A i n o i n o t n m M i n i n i n i n a i i n t n o

a n1 9 O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O _ _ _ _t a x o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

9999999999999999999999999999^99090(M C4O - V O p O O P P O P P P P O P O P O O P O O O O P O O P O O p P P O O Ot M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OK U t f i n o t n i n i n i A o a o o u i i n t n o t n t n i n o t n

I 99999999939999999999999999994C M

»^s IS § S § S i § S § § S § S S § S § S S § § § § S § § § S § S § § § § §o S5

9ar33r]99D9aD1D99D999a93393a>13On« IP, O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

gj Q X O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O QjHg .......^^.^^...^....^.^.......^.....

irt

i 990933039391999999393939033 93 3>?dm u o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oI X -H O O 9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

U C U u i m u i i A i A i n t n p p c a

AR30I282

Page 54: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CSJ

Io

T sU CO

•o -ac c3 <ao —i iL. I13 N I

4->C 3 OJ••— CO "~

o<U 4-4-1 o<u

o>,

OJ COo ini xIT) LUt— CJ

OJe\j ao Vo en w

< X CO UJ "-Of U S.

<M r».O *J-I XU3 UlIX. C_)

1oaooooooooooaoaooooaooooaoooooooooaooaoaoooaooooooaoaooooaoooooaoo——• ——4 ^-» —* ~* __ .-« ^ CNJ ——, -^

O O O O O O O O O C ? O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O C 3 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooaooooooooaoaooaooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooaoooo

oooooooooooaoooooaoooooooooaooooooO O O O O O O C 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C 3 O

>** •—* _J - .Ol _J "-* Oli1 ^

10) O)^-—•—_l » ~-» -v.c 3 _i _j _i ~-~ ai 01 01IO '*—" -^. -** O» 3 3 ^ 3

g,-.•• ^ "« Ven _j ' <u c0) 3 ^. _I C UC —• Ol -•x <U Q.-~<q 3 W .C O —I —•a) «j aj 3 3 3 ~— ^> a 3

C Q) C •* «- *-* U OJ Ol 9J -" --"• Or a) "" J •*•* - ^ >- "**'—• -•<njonj 0) C c —• 3 T3 _l -^ — J O C - ~ — 4) _j OL Ol —I "^^ k f a i a i u e o a —i —• — ~^ —i — » i - i o _ i i i > 0^,03-^.01* > O - W C C C I O » — — - C X ~x !-OI .~Oia,.C- 'O' 0) UO>W>-»0>3Sr— ai«D«Q._j_jfl 4-i~oiajO3oi_i3a-wai-— c 030 3 —j:o££j:o~^^*j aj_j3-o — ~.3->.~- i. us i. aj r:--'rr«~'..i _ U L - - M 4 ^ 4 - » u a i o > c ~* •—> S - ^ •*-•£ ^^a» ogv«'O -—• -«* £ -c c ajo < o o a ) a ) a ) Q . 3 3 m _ j _ i o c n >*- u a) 3 a; >— o — _ i - w _ i u « u a ) D ' a•— t. r— o o o o «^— a~» .t- 3 a)-- « c ««—ex s- ajx-^m-*.— « — £*> —_c 4-> .c u L. i_ i. i oio>o>— c 3 u aj c < a u o c u o i o a i a c O 4 - > q i -u a > o o o o o a ) 0 ) c > J 3 3 ' — ^ W - W N ^ S ^ : — •— <u 3 u 3 i aji u - w o.;:,;: .S^s^f=fi. g c i >-< .j: s £ — a c.c E«OJ: N a> — o ej •— m o «) —t.iu£f£j:oo<— u C w a n - i u - w o v i u c c ^— - > i - u u x :t— CM*— u u u u c c > i u a i — o a < ^saj^Emgajiuiu^iu^x—iO<ioi •'•r--r-r*?'-cec'o>'ri = = 9 P p S -1^TS'"S__.'. r:__

Page 55: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CM COO CO

I XCO LU

CMC\J CM

C

o:

•a T3C C I§HJ I

_l IUUN O )

•M •—C 3 •—

•— c(T3 —CJ U

CMo inI COVI X— UJfv» r

_i COI X

m co— <o• a

* SS^ CO• o~* UJ1— (J

CMO -H

CO X—4 LUh— (J

SoI CO

=5

gaoaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooaoocDoaaoaaooooooooSSo a

= 0o oo a0 0

000

333SSS° ° 3

000

333888000

O 0

3 =3O O0 0- 0

o o a

=J => =3§0 0o o000

o o

=> 3

§80 0

0

=3

8-

0

30a=

o

38o

O 0

3 =1

— —

ooooooooooooooo

333Z333=333=3=3=>=>=3 =g O O O O O O O O O O O O O OoooooOQOooaooo00000-^00000000

O 0

33§8- 0

oaaaooooaoaoooooooooooooooaoaooooooooaooaoaoaooooooaooooooooooooooaooooocDoooaooaooaooooooooooooooooooooooaaooooC\JCSJCJCMOCVCVJCNjOC^C\JCSJCSJCslC\JOC^^OOCSJCUCSJCvJCSIOOCNJCSlC\JCSJC\JCJCSJC\JOCNJ

3333333333333333333333333333333333333ooooaooooooooooooQooooooooaoooaoooooaoooooooooooooaoaooooaoooooaaoaooooooo

g g § § § § § g g g § § g g S S § S § § § § S § S S S § S § S S S § § S 8^ *- ^ H in ^ *-« »— * LO •— 4 ^ ^ »H »— i r \ft j i if) ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ vrt irt « « « ^ ^ •-< •— * fl H

odooooooaooooooaaoaoaaoooooooooaooooocaooo^aoo^ooo^^o o o oaoooooooaooooo^oooooooooooooo'oooooooapoooooopooooooooooo

3333333333333333333333333333333333333ooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooooooooo oooooooociooocJooooooooo'ooocjoooooooooo^^^4^^^^m^^-^>^tn»^*^^4*4^^^4Ln»^CMU3U3>-4^4»>-4'^^Hunun*^f^*^^H^H«-*^i^4Ln-H

—» —• 3 a>_j 3_) » . _J —— 3 -». —— ^ ^ ^

3 _i _j _j o> oi<-« " . ._j _j 3 o u —• « *-» "5L"5L";i—** "^ *^ 3 3 «J -J —* *J -J "-^ *".. •—• CU^.^ - J O l O t p l

Q} O O * * ^ 3 **-* *" ' i i *••« - ) —" ~ 01 *. > j j ™* „j v _j 3] Q) Q) .N Q) 3} 01 C C ""' 3) »* fll *» v «J 3 s. * J«» O) C v ^ -*1 ~* ** ^ C C C "* - .ccccua>^"'M aia)coicoiot^^>'~oi^cd.3iioio)'s*._iot a) 01 a) tu aj —i pi

_o -O ja -a o o a.iQ.j= o o - u o - w o e — OCCM"— u— >ioc-— =^^§o^a-n5f u u uff t-^otats CLOJ a.*)-— e^-— o c t — oijj; c e - "^ w u^

i ^ j - w q i q u a o o o o o: z 3 j c a i a i - M c c c c c c

I I U U C f t l l U l U Q J t V I l )

Page 56: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

oOf

VI -M

§ns i_J IO NJ U)

CJ

11!-5•-<ua

o e<u>.c/>

O33333333333333P-'~3~:"-3"-3'-3"-)'-j'-3'-3"-3"3'-3'-'

ro 0000000000000000000000000000x oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

§000000000000000000000000000poooooooooooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooaoooooo—tooooooo

aoooooooooooooaoooooooaaoaaaooaooooooooooooooooooooaoaooooooo'oociaoooooocaooociooooooo'a

O m oooooooooooooooooooaoooooooox ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCM LU

• a~~ UJt— CJ

o oI ro< X

flu

=3=32 = =3 = 23=3=3 = 3=3=3=32Z33=3Z3 = =)=3333 =oooaoooooooooooaooooooooooooooaoooooooaooooooooooooooocaea

CO — - ooooooaooaoooooooooooooooo

333333333333333333333333333SSSSS83SS38SSSSSSSSSS3SSSS8SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC3C3OOOOOO

o c>1 "

ooaaooooooooooooooaoooooooooO O O O O O C T O O O C T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ooooooooooooooooo^ooooooooooo

C 01 V -C — f•*- II E •>-> >t 4-1s — ~~ -=• « a.c•M V Ol 3 3 <O CT<a «a)o—»3^"-> «--a»*J3^- 4J *J fl _l ——. _J C C —'

Page 57: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

(N

1IOS1 *le

e e i3m \A 1ki

O M •a *H-5 S3•S-S-5«**e •« -H±j n •

Chemical* Do

h« Vicinity

<——

Scti

»H

4

to

CM «o •*1 X

01 U

(N m? 3V Uat u

(N0 »

a xn H0! U

NO <"»t ^S3a u

a «1 Mas(NO

<<

•-< Met u

tM1 fl

B! U

o m u1 X -H

as u a>T3

-1•u1

0000000000000000000000000000000000000O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O P O O0000000000000000000000000000000000000

3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 9 9 9 9 3 9 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 9 9 3 3O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O Q O O O po o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

3 3 3 3 O 3 3 O O O 3 8 3 9 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 D 3 9 3 O 9 3 3 3 9 9 9 9 9 9 9o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

3 3 3 B 3 9 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 B 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 B 3 8 8 8 3 B 3 3 B 3o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo p o o o o P O P p o o o P o o P o P o o o o o o a P P P P P P a o a o o

B 3 8 8 B 3 9 3 8 3 B 8 3 3 9 3 8 8 8 B 3 B 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 8 8 3o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

3 8 8 8 3 8 3 B 3 3 8 B 8 3 B 3 3 3 9 9 8 8 B B 3 B 3 9 9 8 B 3 8 B 8 B 3o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o a a o o o o o a a o o a o o a a o o o p

3 = 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3

o o p p p p o o p p p o e o p p p p p p o p o p p p p p o o o p p p p p ao o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o

3333333333333333333333333333333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oa a o a o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o o a o o a o o a o o a o o o o o a o0000000000000000000000000000000000000

•5 ~ 5f — • 3 o> S a•^ — j ij —5"w ** — — —

s ss i§|n£ir8^i^i<ii§»il^^?i 7^1 Us*

o o o o u o o . a , K k 4 H » . c « . n - H » r < - H M » f n a . c . 3 - ^ » « > i « ' 3 > i r - i • H o u•^-<M^-^^^*J*J*>*> e Oi e at e i a a u j> i » 9>a* a A a ji a • 11*1^*1^^u j: js j: u MA • -^ -H o DI-I^ S&u g-H do 3 o 5 * +i *) • — — -» » — •H o u o H H u l e s a u M > « » < a o - H o a g i 4 M M > i o a « j u » » a O>M u, ,., _, | l - j ^ ^ _ ( _ ( O O J S J 3 U l 4 O M - ( i O O o 5 k 4 » a . ( i « — >- — ~-~-l^lv o a a n v c a a o a a ^ ^ w - u w w i + j Q 5 - - i ^ - i w t » 4 a « i C o o o o o o x• i i i » • i i i i \ j 3 j s m m - * - * . ^ t H j a j a a » - * - * 3 c A m * t i * t i m *

AR30I286

Page 58: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

S3at u

Q Xrf Ma: u

w

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

3333333338393338333333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

3933839339333333339333333333O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 9 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 8 9 3 3 8O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

o o o o ' o d o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

8333838338383838333833989998O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ooddo'do'o'dooooooooooootNOOOoooo

IM 3833393939338383833338393838' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O Q O O O O Q Oo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oQ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O Oooooooooooooo'oooo'oo'ooo'odooo'o'

flR30/287

Page 59: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

k t/1cu•M •—n >—

3 03 IO —I IkU3 N CU

4-1 *•"

5 = 4J<0T3 a) *—

OJ -C O

u1o c

CSJ COo tni XCD UJI— <J

<UCM CO njo m inI X CO) UJ •—Q£ U k

O roCO UJ —Of U CU

o rI Xio iucc o

flu

U

oooaaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo•-t «—I •*-! •—I U1 H ~* •—t U1 >-4 "— •—l-*^-^l^l-*CNJU1Lf>~*~*»-»«-4-^U'lU').'*i—• •—t«4^H^H^««—tl/1—*

ooooooooooooooooooooooooaoaaooooooooooooaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooaooooocJoddoocJa'dociocodaoddooooooooddcJooocJoocJa.^^^i—i—4Ln*-4r^^^Ln'«*^^^^^-t*-4*^i^<v«CNtu^LD«— •—«*M—4i—*mi/i-^^M^^i—i»«w4^^^«Ln^^

333333333333333333333333333333333333^cu rs. S 3 8 8 S S S S 8 S § S S S 8 8 3 3 S 8 S S S S 8 8 S § 8 3 8 8 8 3 3 3 8ooodooooaoooooooodoaooooooooodddooaad

gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggooodooaoaoooooooodooooaoooooooooooooa

-. _ -, »is s- _J _l . —• O>3 d "ol"CT ~ » —•—^~ ~ 3 *O k —• tU—— ~»->«->>33_<_l^-._l_l-~. -^ —— CU £

Ol Ol O* •—**•* «. * » «J " "" O) Ol CU JZ — *JC U 3 3 3 OIOI-^CnOI3 3 Ol J=4->P^>IU

en oi QI

Q)333 aiOl-^01013 3 Ol .C »J O ~ OJ Ol —— •—•—•*-, —— —— •— r— 33C133~--——— —••— C-^Q.tl)e_J'--~—» -~ 3—— —-

s ss § I!---««g-ag1 I 13 -«. >>'asjs'oic i ^ — i viece--~;

O C C C O Q Q ) 3 | C 3 3 ' Q *0 ^^ Si B ^ S 4) ' *^^ ^"^ W C t— C 3t— nt <n QJ w f" .2 (U *™ '" *T ™ g1 p» 3J _g jj | | +j gj r™ ~ <u •*•• <u Ql iQ 3) 19 (U ffl i *~"; J3 o o a. Q.J= o O-M Q - M O e*— occM^-g*-*- >i'o c^- c 3 u c u o . t - _ g— — — — — — • — — — — — - ' ^ H * C C "" Q 4J Si **^ Jt } Q «~^ O ^ -Cjf ? 2 2 jl !c 2 ">!"§•'S •i.l'o.l— So— i e r — «s— ee-^ « c a - 3 - «o o o o o o o ^ k k k n s ^ f l j s — «•—"ktamts^j::— ucu>i(UC>i'— •'—wo— — — —— — ~»—<->4J*J4J c Q.C a. c -C j: c-wj= i « O.Q.C.C.C.C c « Q.«-J:<*-«'—

*7 .S .2 4i "7 "7 •" "- 5 .£ .£ o ojc' 'k 25 S •£ i o o o S k "§."§. «<2.«2.i-2ii •- —<roooLncoooooa'—•— 4J*J4-»*j i -wo o'— '~<— 4J4J*^ « ^ k o o o o o o >>cNTtNim<rWv4r4'4-toc_>uz£zzrnzu3eauuc_>zzz cu v •*> c = c c c c c

flR30f288

Page 60: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

oC£

VI 4-tu JiOJ4-1 '——'«J •—

U JZ O« 4-1 :»u iQJ U_ • —4-* O S

O >, VI

U U

-C Jo c

I Xin uji— (J

O COi x -aCO UJ —a. o a)

oaaooooaoooooooooooooooooaooc3C3oaoo^oooooooaoooooaooc3C3oooodoaoaooooooaoooooooooooooacj

ooooooooooaooaoooaoooooaoooooooaoaooooooooaooooaooaoooooaaaoooaooooooooooCTOooooaoooo

3333333333333333333333333333oooooooooooooaooooooooooooaoooooaooooooooooooooooooooooooooo'ociooooooaaoooaoooooaooo'o'

ooooooooooooocooooooooooooQc

«^ — _1 01 —— 3 0>

-^ O l _ l - » . — • 3—1^-3*-. _j 3 ~» at -j - «-•_1 ^. — ' C 3 1 3 ^ « . CTW^. — «-~ 01 — . 3 ^ - c n (usajuai _i —i 3 _i a) — 33 ^»» • *»' - ^— — » -x. c aj • — • • — '— • 0101 — >_j —loiiu — .u c _j -

330) -J- . ~-»3 — _IC •— U ~- -WO)— • fl« — — » c -~.cn o>- — •a-.-a) sc 01 ai-C'~-=< - > « O I 3 3 n J O > W i 8 — 3 S*»>>«13 u ai o — 3 •— --^ ~-«a)*J3>i --E ~^— '—* -^ u Q.J:r— ^ *j u _j ~— _j c c »— a. >3— •_) —i >f~ o a,id io(ot-^ o>^. atoja) -*— » a," — —1^.1 — ~^ x- — t- —f ^- f a a M ai c— dj)'O_io>i">.oiocn o>»a.i—*»»— fl(O*J3<-lfl3—— O J T 3 O C -^.UCO13C3 -C -C O >1j±c»^iO'— •~-»_<Mio^-ioog>a.a)3— •u— *j4Jinx53a.a.^:<o^:*JC3-Q-Qua) • i— DCO C ^ ^ ^ - U I - I - - —•—•'-'— - U W ^ O J ^ - O O O O C M U — - a c u i - a j o i o i o o o ^N >1 X « 3 £ Q.-C !_ U 1- 1_ .C'aOUIXOt-33'— •— •— -Cc a) *j j-. — K- a. -4j u o o o o-- o i w— c — -— — ' j:j:*>uc3ooO'->icc'— •— •— •— -^i-ooga)£*j uouuj' — Ml I

Page 61: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CQ enl^'3 *d «o —J en

'"* fe a•sj« X* *j aj —io -a ~* 0) 14- ——•w o uQJ •-.

« ••- ai-co.nj —o u i

s4-)

>O C

CMO U")

i m ooomoooooooouooooountnoounoun^nuiotrtX — _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __l UJOfU O O O O O O O O O ~ ^ ^ O O p O O O O O O — t O O O O O O

o en

o en

CM CMa enCSJ UJ

O

o

OJO Oi CO< X~* UJI— O

n3U

U

-^— 4 — oununuiunLn— •— <— «o. . , . . . . . . . . . .ooooooooo— H^oo

333333333333333333333333333ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

.—.—,oun>nu-)tnui — —.—.o — — — — ooai—.OLnooouioocJociocJo—i — ooooaocioo—ooooao

o o o c c o c > c > Q - - — ' O c o c o c D o c — o o a o o o

ooooooooo—• —.000000000-^000000

333333333333333333333333333"O *H

333333333333333333333333333

o o o o o — -.000000000 — 000000

•»» •-. atOl O> •—» 3 -

J. S3•* _j *—* — 0*0 - *** **» c _i •*** c e** —* 3 ^ 4I3& Ql Ol rt? -** O> ••- fl

J *— CCCO1-4-»UU'— O <v O

I I I I I I I^^ £j (2 _ _ _ _ _ „ _ ___ _ _ _ _o o a c o o o o o a o u a a s c c u u x ' - i i ii i i^-r— *— — •— -r— — -a vi « w — « - - - - — - —

aien

flR30i290

Page 62: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

0 -BO <M *H+J 0 U

O H O-ICO.« -IU U I•H -H I

* '

S8

n att y

CNo <n<a x<*p Mo; u

I M2MU

2M

_ _ _ r J S£

o o a m o o o o o o o o i n o o o o k n m o a i n o i n i n t n o^ ^ ^ o m t n u i i / i i n o o ^ O r t i H ^ ^ o o > n o o > r t o o o i no o o o o o o o a ^ H r - t o o o o o a o a a ^ o o o o o o

333993339339393393999099939

o o o o o o o o o ^ ^ o o o o o o o o o ^ o o o o o o

3 3 9 9 3 9 3 3 3 9 9 3 9 3 3 9 3 9 3 9 3 9 3 9 3 3 9

000000000^^000000000^00000

o o o o ^ ^ o o o o o o o o a ^ o o o o o o

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 9 3 3 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 3 9 3 9 3

333333333933333333333333333

933333333933333339333333333

o o o o o o a o o M t - i o o o o o o ' H o o

393333393333933333939339339o o o n o o o o o o a o m o o o o M m o o i n o i n i n i n o

u "a

5 5 §01 m —. a —a a j — j,4 »4 »4 HI »4 >4 H* >J • -v • j a • ax. x. -x >» -^ ^.014* 01 —.fl •— a —oigiw ma a 9J-HOI-.-. - rJ_

?<J, < -~ * ~*. - ~ . *** •v. Ol 4»

OlOlBlOlOiaiOl 0194 _ .. . -— — — 9999939">9>"W — ^ X O h J ^ ^ - i i J- - - ,Jw -1 OlO—^^BiJ'CM 9 - * » 4 l 9 P t OIOItf-^Ql^.M « j 5 i tf u 3 -3 o13 i'

Page 63: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•gg

•g-o

(U <4- ••-

u

C\J COo unI Xm LLJh- <J

«0

a iSs_ OS CJ tUo c

CVJ r-»o «r> XtG ttJa: o

au

OOOC3OOO

333333333333333333333333333

ca2 J Scs N a.c 3 -a•— 03 C-a a * <>>« •= »» CNJ COn _.

x eooaoaoooa—.—laaooooooa — aooooo

a >>**•M o« — u•35°-U U I

oooirJOOoooaoounoooou^u-joounaLOu-ii-no

O O 3 C3 O O O O O •—* *^ O O O O O C3 O O O »™« O O O O O O

o uo

- ***. CTcr» pi —• 3 -i1*-^ j _j —s o» —» q»

•^^ i—• 3 *^» ai2CL a*ai<g'^s,cn-~'Sa»— « tn _i c —^LU u a 3-D ci 3 -j TJ•—"*-»**- atocacvjcMCMCMCj —' ccco»4JUU'— o -* ao uj t— •*-» iti ii i i c u. **- *- —- ^- -— u c3?^o££-Ca S e a c o o o o a o o ^ r a ' z i ' s c c u u x . c i I C D I i iI I !•*-»— F— *— »— ^^-.-QOTU1 «•'-— (O (9 b Q. «) 1 ^SS

en en

AR30I292

Page 64: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

o

c c j

I-3^& 2 *_. 4-1

,7. QJ

IT) —U O |

a ci.

a cotSI UJ

o I UJ

Sx

0

S

-S

3 3 33 3 330303 33 33 330QO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

••* CM OT O ••"« !*•* CM «~H O O CM

en en en O un

CQ33 33 '33 3 CO CO 3 3 3 3 33CQO O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O

en •"•* <T en ^ ui * to r** CMen *r to ~»in CM «r

33 CO3_l333a£Ca_J 33 33 3 3 COO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O— — — - ^ ^ O O O O O C ^ Q O O C O C M O O O O O O O f c Ooaaoooooooowo

CM en o

33 3 3 -J 3 3 OS ~3 33 33 33COO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

o - ^ - ^ c j o c o c M ^r oCO •T "- if) \f) ^

—t CM

33 CD 3 _133 Oi CD ~3 33 33 33COooooooooooooaooooooooooo

C M c n c o en ^4^-r^.oo CM m rnO (A CO en

33 3 3 —I 3 Z3 QCCDr-3 3 33 33ooooooooooooaooooooooooo

CM en * •«T »—i «—t ci5 ts co o rs.CO CO U3 — CNJ

tO CM CO CO

33 3 3 —J 3 3 3 CC 'H 33 33 33O3_ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

CO UJ OOO>r-»dOOOOOOOCOOOCMOOQOOOQc\l._«(_) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CM co ^y ^^ ^H " ^ ^ o coco ••* en o o en(fl ««4 ^ H ^ en

33 3 3 —I 3 3 3 CE 3 33 33 33COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO^OCMOOOOOdOcO

CM co ^ o ^^ en ^ to o o «rCM en —« —* en CM co^^ co *<r m ^ ^

? i1 ^ ^ i''Si — 3 <3 ??;< S1 ?— 3i1g3^<-i'i>3^^g a,3§1i^?i"r~iS'o-ligi — » i1 i1! s *~J 1 — iico— g<— S3 — <J«--o -^' — « c t. — in — t. g — — •— geS'— — — • "- 4>— i c ) 3 » - TS— o— >,iooio2S.ccT3•wviui.-B'— k.aa.aon

Page 65: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

? a2x

s<*

i n

88« *

ot3

fii

939 39.433 ot *3 33 33 D D 03o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

333333*4333« ^ 33 33 3 3 CQO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo o o o o o o o o o a o m o t o r ^ o o o o o o o i n

w n m f* a% f-t 1-1 ^ ^ m *«o « A en o*

339 3 3 > 4 3 3 3 B C a n 3D 33 938O O Q O O O Q O O O O Q O O a O Q O O O O O O O

in i-i ffl •» 05

f-t

33 33*433 ±A>- > 93 99 99Ao o o o o o o a o o o o o o o o o a o o o o o o

r* \a « A *nV «• a?

999 99.J9330C ^ 39 £ 3 99fl§ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O B O O M O O O O O O O O I

en CN *ooin pi

399 D 3 J D 3 D O C 3 O 33 99 99g O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O ^ O O O O O O O O O O O f M O O O O O O O O

M m in o * ** ** « « <rt« o •-< « r*<n in *

399 39*499 flC O 39 39 39«O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo o o p ' O o o o o r ^ o o ^ o ^ t H o o o o o o o r *f n o c M M t - t r n o i n r t f n o A M O i n o t a n i A i A o n f n e ^CN tn o t-i CM o « *-* at IHA ^ o < m a

o* r «T

O 3 3 99 9 99 0 99 99 390)

r M « d « * M m o « « r « a o * - t o o o * o < n c ' 4 o m o t t *M -« W O rt • p» • o O ^

m <n m o ^

3

Page 66: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CSJ

T3C•3Ooe cu1 -4-1

U COCO _

ll i2"j213 £ a— 1 4J

fr> CJ

~O cy -«

u —0) <4- __

M ° «CD >..£

^•5Q

O u ]J>

0)*»

«

1 LU££

CO +•»CVJ CO tj

1 LU C

2x"u*— *~.•o

CM en 5o GO CJ ' —o; z a;

w-

CM 1 UJ(0 Uce z

03U

U

33 3 3 COO O O O C9 O O O O O O O O O O r

to •-» CO O _«,— 1,-irQ csjta^ O1 ^ OT CD T-^ rC to — T^

=3 = = :DO-3aj3:D::3ceeia^3:3::Doooooooooooooooooooooooaoocr, unoocnoojeM— tcnoLOf^.dOcoojVf-tcu n r»* »-» -» •-« co

J^3.-DO3COI333OSJT33

gggglggggogoooocnocsjcsj*-«cn^U)r^moocM^^-4CM ro —• •— • '- CO

4

33= CD 3 _1 ^ CE CD -3

o§§§5ai§oS§So§§f^O<vj^.lf^OTJ?f«^U^(j . i tO O OJCM co ^ ^-* n £. en

•— » ^ -

^ s ^ ^ ^ s fli£ ? §» - g1"!* , ^ 3 "G" ^

§>» «— 3 g •*-*•—. o» o» 3 wCU •'- E E 3 OJ 3 3 "" QJ

C O •— E — 3 3 — 4J 1- T3 '— "— « C•— g e 3 »— •*- •— g *~ <u - - iy T]3 4J « U. U "Q »— U .Q Q. (TJ O (Q WC

J 30 3 00

25oooooSor-icn^^o^^oW V

CO

33=30 = COO=3(nooooooooocsjoooooooaooco^uOLDOcocnvn

cO rO "—4 CM

O33_D3tn_3^COaooaooooaCMOOOOOOOOocOTuitnocomo2 2 ^

3O 3 Z3 3 3 CDOOOOOOOOOCM O O O O 3 Ql O r1**

Sen CO CMCM

^ CM

CM

^

-lia-SS" i """ -5 5i 3 ~ 111*5 liTiJ.il3 0) W C <U.2^1Bu o+j|~''~"O jg c c

Page 67: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

RESIDENTIAL WELLS

AR30I296

Page 68: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

C3)-a a>

,•a N ic -w3 3 <UO 03 •—CS OJ 4J

.a u

<_)it-IS

caI

8-5."•8

1

33333333

333333233333333333333333333333:

Page 69: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

u

I5•*•»

§-S3 01••— 4-1

CU IS)

1 ^(_ u—0) -O4-1 C

3 -3 iI-O N 1C •!->3 3 HIO CO ~13 0) 4J

J= IBC -M ~— 0u- :»•a oHICJ 4-1 1CU •- 14J C01 —o u

IQ 01o j=

£u14-au

u

CKUJu.u.

aeUJ

c/1

3_J

i"iT4-J

o: uUJ —

a a.ae.

i5

ical

.1u

CT"* (U tU W 1* 3 * ••• — W O*"** 91 O O) C. O) O>3 O» 0> JE C 3 CQ — 0) —»—^^—» tU^v.O)'— 33O»3 UO) 13 flj U 33•*—» 3 C ^ -M Q) "* Cft *J "" C *"* *"~ """ C O) C *••»• '•i *—• 3 <«—rf^^ Q. Ci "" C q ™» «« ««»*4) OL**X. o (p •*-• o 3 —^ p. 01 at BI N —* M 3 ) < u a > OI-^UKJ iu fa a><s^o)cuC C B O O I ^ U C t-'-^^oa^^c C'«-'CC<uco»>oc:^cc ^q»ec:Q* Q Q.*w CoS*C'~WCfta» ^ C ^ t U N N I U M ^ -C .fl -<•* •*- .a >*"—' M No j = t •'-t-a«i_cc:3acua)aj'— <u— c c c a c u o a>*o o J= ccu ^^ «-i a> > o ^ jz u 4i"—• u c c c > « N > i ( U ( U ( U ' H * i u < u i u s m u 4J •— dj a*-- - • a. +j flj M ooiav.cc.CN.p.ao.gccno^-'-MO'-^OQ.s.o

rror^^vo^St---^-^^-^-^----^^^ 'r^^>^§ p"SS

-^ C~orh ?»—'™uo~T^rin^o o"o**'ot"r^"o«n OCM*—^o~ - L. .C _C .4-1 -i I I «l 31 • JI «3 - C ^—^ I I

i - - . - - - -- . _ 4 - 1 O U 1 - U — J31— « — 1 — U > - U U

— U'^HO • •— "- • O 1 Q. O O 1 CO 1 3— — CX— >"-I.C.Cl'— I O — —^ ~~<— o -.CSJ O -^ J3 CJ M CO CM ~ O OCU

- -i i • a. £ -kff - 4J -i i i MI 31 • J2 a •O.OOCO 1- CM UCO'V — CMCOCMCM Q. X CM

flR30!298

Page 70: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo^^^^^^^^•^^^ui^*-*-*~*~*<-**-4~*~4»-*Ln*-4inf-«~-«~Hin-*u')kn~*<--*»H~-4<-thninu

VI

2 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~*«—4~*~*—4»-tt—4»-«~*»-«»-IUl—*———— ^^ —— —— ^ —— ^^^UI^-tl/J —— H^^lO^^Vnirt.'H—4~*«—(i-HU'lLO

CU C I

N 0)•a *j •—C 3 —30is aaooaaaoaoooaaoooaoaoooooaooaooaooooooo^^^^*»*«^*-i*-«^^«-«i«4^^^^i/)^^**^^H^«v^«^*««v>4*4vHio*^ui^^^H^Hvn»^hnu)^^i-H<-4«-H>-4unui£0 X4-1 2»

C

S a,-2O -C O

_ ° 55 010) >t CO 4J

(A HJac u

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos:

oooooooooaooooooaooooooaaaooooaaaaoooao

oooooooooooooooooooooaoooooooooooooaooo

-»» —. — — — r—

3 ^n Ol r™" Ol Ol Ol

4J Ol 0) ^» 3 O 3 ••- 3^« O» >s» Ol'—J J 3 C ——— C—•TJ — —•^•^Ol—«3-^» —• ~

• S—— — —•>~' M Ol U -C I1«-"- •».'—'— >i'-C—«3ca.(

§•», 3 tU 3 C ——— c—•'O — •— «^«^Oi—«3—• Oi 3 -.'— *—~O.. .. . _ - _ 01 ~— 1— u -^ .. o) „ « o o u JJ,—— d . -,— i1 c1 ^T,

lU3(U3e3-v.— OI-xC JS 3*>.— -4->~-aj— oiosoiuaja. — <ua a 3 3 c — • 3 3 •<-> i — • E

— — "5.— O.-Q CH£J:+.i< — — -5 « C i u •»• — ec^ _ _^_lo'S'>,5'>io— S 2 §~i o5"5fa 2— 2*>>— i^ 2 S*>i2 c SS^ 3'^ c-^ii S 3 c>— — .ci.ci-.c.5g!--— - - - I — i.ca.co-C.ci i o i- a. — ua^i-N— ><oj)t.—IM I 01 ««^ 01 •*• la &• O. •*" I N *-^ I >^1£<Q£IU4 • • £"*OICI*«aCI'^~4)l4-t£O'^lc cvi 5C inxz X-M oz^r c MVCM a.u xu3Cx<r<ruzl«)iozai«>ZAviuu 3z<o

ftR30i299

Page 71: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

aooaoaooooaooirtoooooooooQCO O

12

U TJ(U C I4-> (13 I

•83 =3 ffl 4JO <O

Istu e i

ae

Q£LUI—in

i0)

t/i iaCfi U

§f

ooooooooooooomoooooooooa

aooooooesooooOTOoaooooooo

aooooaaooi

333333333333300333333333 =aaooooooooaoocooooooooaaa*^<-Hf^U)^^^4«^^N^M*^Cd»^^>4 •^4^^^^*^«-4^^»-«<-4^4in

en '* ^ en Q) * *™*'™— cn*ii«* •"'" en3k i— at a<~~ ** •— - , ~. a oi~« 3. tj.~i~ •». 3«<— ^la-^enen «-• 3 ej>«—etuenen —• oj c 3 i— ^*~^—.cu^ cf"" ">,~«2.—% ««— fl-5^* £«ce^l£§c^e — •* — — — u a.4Juaiai>«u«8'-UM'—•«»—-fl"^. W N C ; —»io££3eti8'—•—^ajHooi'—»-oi xcS ^-^*»*i«-.-~u>»x —«C3--..53 -y*o^>«scc.. -a^t-j; —CQ. S £ 3 -» B3 i35o-~>,scc -ai t-J= —ti M u < o>^ >— j: «j'— x^io«jiuo4-'<u*^—~^r— c j: 3 4-> —.Q.OI-~^IU*JI-UCI c a. u •— o>>, u a. »> — jz v- u u .c 01 i j= a o urn «•—1^.3rrC^OC . Q.C^»CO*>3— Q.3 3t --~ -^ Ol ——

1

T3 ijot ui «^-a>a>(U'—c—•>>•—'—'— >w.c .-03oj5«-a«-5>».23N.eio jc >>i»- w- a. > -.c o -~ «n a a .c a> **•«•• * c u •—• 4) *J *•• «-» ' - a - in eoa^-£4-iu3c u-^facuju^^ia ^ ^ en o a? •*-uS^uc«ja«JCio— «i 3~-~-— OIM—I.CT34 - I O U < « i Q U I L.c^~! O C A C M I O O O C C O - 4 - * * ^ * *-i.io.wc.ceoa) >- N >>— C I ^ N M U U N — r— Mz co x c « w i 3 u *J tn c u w i ccc-3^cz— c

AR30f3QO

Page 72: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Istfl c/lOJOS <—

•a -u

I COoa.

3 ta cooooooooooooooooooi

c a.UJ Uoj o i .- -a ••- i

a>>

ceUJu.

EX3•a

I

u

oooooooeoooocaooooo

oooooooooooaooo^oo

ooocsaoocoooocooooo

33333333333333333

3333333333333 = 33 = 333

IOOOOOOOO'

. . . . . . . .QOOOOOOOO • •oooaaooa oo

^ —— •O X 3 -~»-~ —• —.>*.»-. 3—— 0)0)-—'3333333' * *"• * C Ol O *••* " p-" ~ _. 3»— eL •«>•-> -~— ^-» a » a > < a a a >a 01 3 —i*— c— uj — oia»'->-> oiwi oiw e"D"a aus — CMCMOQVO•— 5 — •»•» •>. 33»x 3 3 O O f c - u » — —ojov^r^-ulto«_* u an t- e *—'••' 91 c — •* e < — 4-»oo OCVJCMCVJCUCMCMu u u o s a a 310 <o jzai-— •— o«^.— — — ,««-»xcjXX'--^'— *-cuj»— H-Q*.H-U^:J=J:CI i i i i i ico3:mcQ.c JZ'~*^a *~£a* — o>« c j u o j u u t - u u u ui CQ i i u c u 3 t . a c 3 O 3 o x c i I J T O O O O O O O''— • i- o - o - j=t.j=

U)»-O-D^--O'»*-1T3Q.-'- *cc -c: • Q J C > W

flR30i30l

Page 73: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

•a N xC 4-> U

O 0) fl0)

o>>

CMw —cu inae.

333 33 33 3COCQ CO33 33 33oooooaoooocaaoooooooaooooC3OOLnOOOOOU)OCM^4OCMCMOOOOOOOC3

CO12

UU CMU. U1u. *:

CO33 33 33 3 CO CO CO 3 3 33 33QDI O O O O O O O

CM —< o «<T —« -^ in o men CM tr o

333 33 33 3 CO 33 =3= =

SSS5SSSSSSSSSSS8SS33SS•-« *-4 CM Oo

en

a o a toto to r CM

33C033 33 3 CO CO33 33 33aoooaooooooooaaoooooooaomoo — ooooooooLnococMOOOooooo

__ ._ CE3 i£ ...-a o -w

333 33 33 3 CO 33 33 33gcaooaooooogooooooooooooooocnooooQOOta^otocMQOooaooo

33 33 33 O CO CO CO33 33 =>

gg5S§gg§gggSggSSggg§ggcnocMcn — enoinr-.toc>oevJcicoc M e n c o o 'V^uio CQ o

CO CO

-» •«. —i *-* ai _j —f ••>.-« —• -j tn cn_j . ex•••.—•—»-» »>.oiO)-~-_i3^--~-ai_i_j-~^ 3a-~-_i3CT_i_io>cna a en •"*»•—» 01 en 3 *••» * » cn ^ 1 — «- en-»* «- 3 "* * 3 3 *-— i'g -f f^^^g o. i'g-i'i1—r ;i s «"•"- i § S—ji S3* 8 >.-3 i—§ i 5CO— S— 33 — *>u-e — *- w c t. — »i — u « •- •- —•gig.3^,1 ol« etc cT,S§,3JJISgSl = 0- — —

Page 74: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORTREV. #1

30/SEPT/91

Page 75: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR ARSENIC

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Inorganic arsenic is a component of sulfitic ores, ofcopper, cobalt, and nickel. Arsenic trioxide (white arsenic) is releasedas a yapor during air roasting of these ores. Inorganic arsenic appearsas a silver-gray to white, brittle, crystalline, metallic-looking,odorless, and tasteless substance. The molecular weight of arsenic is74.92 g/mol (Weast 1988).

Molecular Formula: As

Absorption: Many factors govern the uptake and amount of arsenic absorbedby the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts including the chemical formof the element being absorbed, the physical characteristics, and the doselevel. Net absorption of arsenic through the gastrointestinal andrespiratory tracts is estimated to be > 30% of the total ingested orinhaled amount (USEPA 1984).

Fate: Industrial sources are primary contributors of arsenic into theatmosphere. Vapor of arsenic trioxide forms readily at high temperaturesand rapidly adheres to particulate matter. Wet and dry deposition playmajor roles in transferring arsenic to surface waters and soils. Insoils, arsenic binds to clay particles. Leaching of arsenic intogroundwater may also occur. The mobility of the pertinent form is afunction of soil pH, phosphate levels, iron, aluminum content, and soiltype. Reduction and methylation of inorganic arsenic occurs only to alimited extent in soils, reportedly 1-2% over a period of months (USEPA1984).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Studies performed on occupational smelter workers found a correlation between theexposure to arsenic and lung cancer mortality (Enterline and Marsh 1982; Lee-Feldstein 1983; Axelson et al. 1978; Tokudome and Kurdtsene 1976; Rencher et al.

flR3Qi.3Ql4

Page 76: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

1977). Chronic oral exposure results in severe gastrointestinal damage andincludes a sequence of changes in skin epithelium, proceeding fromhyperpigmentation to hyperkeratosis characterized as keratin proliferation of averrucose nature (USEPA 1984). This may lead in some cases to late onset skincancers. The skin cancers can be histopathologically characterized as eithersquamous carcinomas in the keratotic areas or basal cell carcinomas, with alatency period of 6-50 yrs. (USEPA 1984). Arsenic is classified as a Group Acarcinogen (i.e., human carcinogen) (USEPA 1991). The oral slope factor forarsenic, 1.70 (mg/kg/day)"1 (USEPA 1991), is based on large scale epidemiologicstudies of arsenic-contaminated drinking water (Tseng 1977). The studiesinvolved the population living in Taiwan where the arsenic-contaminated drinkingwater supply was endemic. Results showed significant increases in mortalityrates for cancer of the bladder, lung, liver, kidney, skin, and colon. Cancerof various internal organs has been found in several case reports involving theingestion of arsenic (Tseng 1977).

NONCARCIMOGEN1C EFFECTS:

Central nervous system (CNS) effects, gastrointestinal effects and peripheralcardiovascular effects have been documented following accidental ingestion ofarsenic (USEPA 1984). A reversible anemia has been observed after chronicexposure via arsenic-contaminated well water (USEPA 1984). An epidemiologicalstudy performed on a Taiwanese population with protracted exposure to arsenicingestion showed an increase in the incidence of Blackfoot disease (peripheralvasculopathy), although direct causation is considered questionable. A chronicoral RfD for arsenic of l.OE-3 mg/kg/day in drinking water has been calculatedusing an uncertainty factor of 1 based on the Taiwan study (USEPA 1990, Tseng1977). An USEPA work group is currently reevaluating the RfD for arsenic (USEPA1991).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 1.70 (mg/kg/day)"1Weight of Evidence: A

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: l.OE-3 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1Critical Effect: Keratosis and hyperpigmentation

M30I305

Page 77: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

REFERENCES:

Axelson, O.E. Dahlgren, C.D. Jansson and S.O. Rehnlund. 1978. Arsenic exposureand mortality: A case referent study from a Swedish copper smelter. Br.i in/4 MoH -?[;• Q.II;J. Ind. Med. 35: 8-15.

Enter!ine, P.E. and G.M. Marsh. Mortality among workers exposed to arsenic andother substances in a copper smelter. Am. J. Epidemiol. 116; 895-910,1982.

Lee-Feldstein, A. 1983. Arsenic and respiratory cancer in man: Follow-up of anoccupational study. In: Arsenic: Industrial, Biomedical, andEnvironmental Perspectives, W. Lederer and R. Fensterheim, Ed. VanNostrand Reinhold, New York.

Rencher, A.C., M.W. Carter and D.W. McKee. 1978. A retrospective epidemiologicalstudy of mortality at a large western copper smelter. J. Occup. Med. 19:754-758.

Tokudome, S. and M. Kuratsune. 1976. A cohort study on mortality from cancer andother causes among workers at a metal refinery. Int. J. Cancer. 17: 310-317.

Tseng, W.P. 1977. Effects and dose-response relationships of skin cancer andblackfoot disease with arsenic. Environmental Health Perspectives.19:109-119.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Health Assessment Documentfor Arsenic. USEPA Report No. 600/8-83-021F. Office of Health andAssessment, USEPA, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Health Effects AssessmentSummary Tables (HEAST). Fourth Quarter FY-1990. OSWER, USEPA.

U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Toxic Profile for Arsenic. Online, March1991. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. EnvironmentalCriteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

Weast, R.C. 1988. Handbook of chemistry and physics. 69th ed. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, B-8, B-72 to B-73.

3R3QI306

Page 78: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR BERYLLIUM

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:Chemical Properties: Beryllium is a gray metallic element that belongs toGroup IIA of the periodic table and has an oxidation state of +2. It hasa molecular weight of 9.01 g/mol and in pure form is composed of hexagonalcrystals (Weast 1983). Average estimates of the abundance of beryllium inthe earth's crust range from 2-10 ppm. Beryllium occurs as a component ofmore than 40 minerals (USEPA, 1986). Although elemental beryllium isinsoluble, many of its compounds are highly soluble in water.

Molecular Formula: Be

Absorption: Several studies show varying results concerning theabsorption of beryllium. Rats that were administered a dose of berylliumvia a stomach tube absorbed <0.2% (Crowley et al. 1949). Furchner et al.,(1973) and Hyslop et al. (1943), using rodents, dogs, and monkeys, wereable to demonstrate only <1% absorption of beryllium ingested. However,Reeves (1965), in a study involving rats provided beryllium in theirdrinking water for several weeks, concluded that 10-40% of berylliumingested could be absorbed in the stomach due to the lower pH maintainingberyllium salts in their ionized and soluble form.

Fate: Most beryllium in the atmosphere is produced by coal combustion;therefore, its most common form is probably beryllium oxide. Wet and drydeposition are routes of removal of beryllium from the atmosphere (USEPA1987). Particles from stack emissions are thought to stay aloft -10 days.The average concentration of beryllium in rain or snow is expected to be0.01 ng/g (USEPA 1986). After reaching soils and sediments, it is thoughtto be retained as beryllium oxide (USEPA 1986). Beryllium will mostlikely be very persistent in this form (Fishbein 1981).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

The oral slope factor of 4.3 (mg/kg/day)"1 was derived based on results of twochronic oral laboratory studies (USEPA 1987). In the Schroeder and Mitchener

SR3QI307

Page 79: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

(1975a,b) studies, rats and mice were given 5 ppm beryllium sulfate in theirdrinking water. Male rats had an increase of grossly observed tumors and femaleshad a small increase of lymphoma leukemias. One epidemiological study (Berg andBurbank 1972) found a positive correlation between beryllium concentration inwater and cancer death rate in a human population, but the cause and effectrelationship could not be proven (USEPA 1986). Beryllium is considered aprobable human carcinogen (Group B2).

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Several early studies showed a form of rickets was produced in young animalsfollowing ingestion of beryllium because of its propensity to bind with phosphateand thus deplete phosphate levels in the body (Guyatt et al. 1933, Jacobson 1933,Kay and Skill 1934). A later chronic study of beryllium toxicity (Schroeder andMitchener 1975b) showed glucose levels to increase and body weight to decreaseespecially in young animals. There was also some evidence of teratogeniceffects. Based on this study, USEPA (1991) adopted an oral reference dose of 5E-3 (mg/kg/day) because this dosage produced the most significant decrease in bodyweight (Schroeder and Mitchener 1975b). An uncertainty factor of 100 was usedto account for interspecies and intraspecies variability (USEPA 1991).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 4.3 (mg/kg/day)"1Weight of Evidence: B2

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: 5E-3 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 100Critical Effect: none observed

REFERENCES:

Berg, J.W. and F. Burbank. 1972. Correlations between carcinogenic tracemetals in water supply and cancer mortality. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci. 199:249-261.

Crowley, J.F., J.G. Hamilton and K. J. Scott. 1949. The metabolism of Carrier-free radioberyllium in the rat. J. Biol. Chem. 177: 975-984.

AR30I308

Page 80: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Fishbein, L. 1981. Sources, transport and alterations of metal compounds: Anoverview. 1. Arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and nickel. Environ.Health Perspect. 40: 43-64.

Furchner, J.E., C.R. Richmond, and J.E. London. 1973. Comparative metabolism ofradionuclides in mammals: VI. Retention of beryllium in the mouse, rat,monkey and dog. Health Phys. 24: 292-300.

Guyatt, B.L, H.D. Ray, and H.D. Branion. 1933. Beryllium rickets. J. Nutr.6:313-324.

Hyslop, F., E.D. Palmes, W.C. Aford , A.R. Monaco and L.T. Fairhall. 1943. Thetoxicity of beryllium. Allied Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C. NIHBull No. 181.

Jacobson, S.A. 1933. Bone lesions in rats produced by the substitution ofberyllium for calcium in diets. Arch. Pathol. 15:18-26.

Kay, H.D. and D.L. Skill. 1934. Prevention and cure of beryllium rickets.Biochem J 28:1222-1229.

Reeves, A.L. 1965. The absorption of beryllium from the gastrointestinal tract.Arch. Environ. Health. 11:209-214.

Schroeder, H.A. and M. Mitchener. 1975a. Life-term studies in rats: Effects ofaluminum, barium, beryllium, and tungsten. J. Nutr. 105(4): 421-427.

Schroeder, H.A. and M. Mitchener. 1975b. Life-term effects of mercury, methylmercury, and nine other trace metals on mice. J. Nutr. 105(4): 452-458.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1986. Health Assessment Documentfor Beryllium. Prepared by the Office of Health and EnvironmentalAssessment, Research Triangle Park, NC.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1987. Health Effects Assessmentfor Beryllium and Compounds. Environmental Criteria and AssessmentOffice, Cincinnati OH.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Toxic Profile for Beryllium. Online, March1991. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. EnvironmentalCriteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

Weast, R.C. Ed. 1983. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics., 64th ed. CRC PressInc., Boca Raton, FL. p. B-74.

AR30I309

Page 81: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:Chemical Properties: 1,2-Dichloroethane is a member of the halogenatedaliphatic hydrocarbon (purgeable halocarbon) chemical class of compounds.

• 1,2,-Dichloroethane has a molecular weight of 98.96 g/mol (Weast 1981).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Fifty male and 50 female Osborne-Wendel rats and B6C3F1 mice were administered1,2-dichloroethane in corn oil by gavage. The study ran 78 weeks followed by anadditional observation period for both the rats and the mice. Dosages for ratswere 47 and 95 mg/kg/day, for male mice 97 and 195 mg/kg/day, and for female mice149 and 299 mg/kg/day. All high dose female rats died after 15 weeks, and after23 weeks all high dose male rats died. Results for male rats exposed to 1,2-dichloroethane included increased incidence of forestomach squamous-cellcarcinomas and hemangiosarcomas. There were significant increases in theincidence of mammary adenocarcinoma in female rats and mice. Female mice alsoexperienced endometrial stromal polyps and sarcomas. Male mice developedhepatocellular carcinomas. Both sexes of mice showed effects of alveolaradenomas and branchiolar adenomas (NCI, 1978). From the above study, an oralslope factor of 9.1xlO'2 (mg/kg/day)'1 was calculated (USEPA 1991).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 9.1E-2 (mg/kg/day)"1Inhalation Slope Factor: NDWeight of Evidence: B2

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity: ND

REFERENCES:

NCI (National Cancer Institute). 1978. Bioassay for ,2,-Dichloroethane forPossible Carcinogenicity. NCI Carcinogenic Technical Report Series No.55. DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 78-1361, Washington, D.C.

U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Toxicity Profile for 1,2-Dichloroethane.Online March 1991. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment.Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

SR30I3IO

Page 82: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Weast, R.C. 1981 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 61st edition. Boca Raton,FI: CRC Press.

flR3G13l I

Page 83: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: 1,1-Dichloroethene is a highly volatile, colorlessliquid having a molecular weight of 96.95 g/mol. 1,1-Dichloroethene is amember of the halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbon (purgeable halocarbon)chemical class of compounds (USEPA 1989). 1,1-Dichloroethene with asolubility of 4 x 10"2 mg/L is practically insoluble in water (Merck 1983).

Molecular Formula: C2H2C12

Absorption: Lab animal studies show rapid absorption of 1,1-dichloroethene both orally and through inhalation (Dallas et al. 1983;McKenna et al. 1978; Jones and Hathaway 1978).

Fate: Most 1,1-dichloroethene is released to the atmosphere. Majorcontributors of 1,1-dichloroethene are industrial and hazardous wastesites. Most of the 1,1-dichloroethene found in surface waters and soilwill quickly evaporate into the atmosphere. 1,1-Dichloroethene doses notadsorb to particulate matter readily; therefore, most 1,1-dichloroethenefound in subsurface soils will leach into groundwater (USEPA 1989).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Inhalation: Maltoni et al. (1985) presently is the one study positively linkinganimals inhaling 1,1-dichloroethene to the formation of tumors. Rats exposed to100 ppm of 1,1-dichloroethene for 7 hours/day, 5 days/week showed increasedincidence of malignant and nonmalignant tumors and leukemias in rats. From theseresults an inhalation slope factor of 1.2 (mg/kg/day)'1 was derived (USEPA 1991).

Oral: NTP (1982) performed a study from which the most conservative slopefactor, 6E-1 (mg/kg/day)'1 was derived. Effects such as a significant increaseof adrenal tumors in males were noted at this dose level. Two other studies(Quast et al. 1983; and Maltoni et al. 1985) verified a slope factor of 2E-1

A R 3 Q 1 3 I 2

Page 84: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

(mg/kg/day)"1, but USEPA (1991) has adopted the higher estimate.

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Inhalation: Humans inhaling 1,1-dichloroethene for a short period of time mayencounter neurotoxicity (Henschler et al. 1970; Tierney et al. 1979). Chronicexposure to 1,1-dichloroethene may be associated with hepatotoxicity andnephrotoxicity (Tierney et al. 1979). Tierney et al. (1979) observed in humansinhaling 1,1-dichloroethene (approximately 4,000 ppm) caused central nervoussystem depression and symptoms of inebriation progressing to convulsions andunconsciousness. Laboratory animals chronically exposed to 1,1-dichloroetheneexhibit toxic effects of the central nervous system, liver, kidney and lungs(USEPA 1989). One study performed on rats exposed by inhaling 24 ppm of 1,1-dichloroethene for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 18 months showed fatty changesin the liver (Quast et al. 1986). An inhalation reference dose is under reviewby an USEPA work group (USEPA 1991).

Oral: Laboratory animals orally exposed show the main targets of 1,1-dichloroethene toxicity to be the liver and kidney (USEPA 1989). Several studieshave noted in fasted rats that a single dose of 50 mg of 1,1-dichloroethene/kgbody weight or higher caused a significant increase in serum enzyme marker ofliver dysfunction and an increase in liver weight. The nutritional status of theanimals and the dosing vehicle influence the hepatotoxicity of orallyadministered 1,1-dichloroethene (Andersen and Jenkins 1977; Andersen et al. 1980;Chieco et al. 1981; Jenkins and Andersen 1978).

Quast et al. (1983) administered 50, 100, or 200 ppm in drinking water of ratsfor 2 years. Hepatic lesions were noted. In the same study, beagle dogs alsoshowed liver sensitivity to 1,1-dichloroethene in the diet. A LOAEL of 9mg/kg/day was established based on this study. From this an oral RfD of 9E-3mg/kg/day was established taking a 1000-fold uncertainty factor into account forinter- and intraspecies variation and because no NOAEL was established (USEPA,1991).

HR30I3I3

Page 85: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 6.0E-1 (mg/kg/day)"1Inhalation Slope Factor: 1.2 (mg/kg/day)"1Weight of Evidence: C

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: 9.0E-3 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1000

REFERENCES:

Andersen, M.E., J. Jenkins. 1977. Oral tpxicity of 1,1-dichloroethylene in therat: Effects of sex, age, and fasting. Environ Health Perspect 21: 157-163.

Andersen, M.E., O.E. Thomas, M.L. Gargas, et al. 1980. The significance ofmultiple detoxification pathways for reactive metabolites in the toxicityof 1,1-dichloroethylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 52: 422-432.

Chieco, P., M.T. Moslen, E.S. Reynolds. 1981. Effects of administrativevehicle on oral 1,1-dichloroethylene toxicity. Tox Appl Pharmacol 57:146-155.

Dallas, C.E., F.W. Weir, S. Feldman, et al. 1983. The uptake and dispositionof 1,1-dichloroethylene in rats during inhalation exposure. Toxicol ApplPharmacol 68: 140-151.

Henschler, D., F. Broser, H.C. Hopf. 1970. Polyneuritis cranialis followingpoisoning with chlorinated acetylene while handling vinylidene chloridecopolymers. Arch Toxicol 26: 62-75.

Jenkins, L.J., M.E. Andersen. 1978. 1,1-Dichloroethylene nephrotoxicity in therat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 46: 131-141.

Jones, B.K., D.E. Hathway. 1978. Differences in metabolism of vinylidenechloride between mice and rats. Br J Cancer 37: 411-417.

Maltoni, C., P. Lefemine, Cotti et al. ed. 1985. Experimental research onvinylidene chloride carcinogenesis. Archives of Research on IndustrialCarcinogenesis. Vol. 3, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishers.

McKenna, M.J., J.A. Zempel, E.O. Madrid, et al. 1978. The pharmacokinetics of[14C] vinylidene chloride in rats following inhalation exposure. ToxicolAppl Pharmacol 45: 599-610.

Merck. 1983. The Merck Index. In: Windholz M. ed. 10th ed. New Jersey:Merck and Co., Inc. 1430.

Quast, J.F., Huniston C.G., Wade C.E., et al., 1983. A chronic toxicity andoncogenicity study in rats and subchronic toxicity study in dogs oningested vinyldene chloride. Fundan. Appl. Toxicol. 3(1): 55-62.

/JR30I3II*

Page 86: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Quast, J.F., M.J. McKenna, L.W. Rampy, et al. 1986. Chronic toxicity andoncogenicity study on inhaled vinylidene chloride in rats. Fund ApplToxicol 6: 105-144.

Tierney, D.R., T.R. Mackwood, M.R. Piana. 1979. status assessment of toxicchemicals: vinyldene chloride. Cincinnati, Ohio: US EnvironmentalProtection Agency. USEPA 600/2-79-2100 (PB80-146442).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. lexicological Profile for1,1-Dichloroethene. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.December 1989.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Office of Health and Environmental Assessment.Cincinnati, OH.

SR30I3I5

Page 87: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: 1,2-Dichloroethene exists in cis- and trans-isomerswhich have a molecular weight of 96.94 g/mol (Weast, 1983). Both formsexist as colorless liquids (Hawley 1981). The trans- form has a watersolubility of 6,260 mg/L at 25°C, while the cis- form has a solubility of3,500 mg/L (Horvath 1982). Both forms are also soluble in organicsolvents such as ether, alcohol, benzenes, acetone, and chloroform. Thevapor pressures at 25°C vary from 336 mm Hg for the trans- form to 215 mmHg for the cis- form (Stevens 1979).

Molecular Formula: C2H2C2

Absorption: No studies were found that quantified the rate or extent towhich cis- or trans- 1,2-dichloroethene were absorbed following oralexposure. Sato and Nakajima (1979) reported a blood/air partitioncoefficient for the cis- isomer of 9.2 and for the trans- isomer, 5.8.Exposure to 1,2-dichloroethene by inhalation resulted in equilibrium withthe whole animal and the inspired 1,2-dichloroethene within 1.4-2 hours(Filser and Bolt, 1979). Lehmann and Schmidt-Kehl (1936) reported that72-75% absorption of 1,2-dichloroethene occurred by the lungs in humans.

Fate: Using rainwater samples, Kawamura and Kaplan (1983) indicated that1,2-dichloroethene is removed from the atmosphere via precipitation.However, most of the 1,2-dichloroethene removed in this manner is likelyto reenter the atmosphere by volatilization. Due to the vapor pressuresof both isomers, neither form is expected to partition from the vaporphase to participates in the atmosphere. Experimental results haveconfirmed the volatilization half-lives of 5.0 hours for the cis- isomerand 6.2 hours for the trans- isomer from a body of water 1 m deep (Billing1977).

Adsorption of 1,2-dichloroethene isomers to soil and sediment in water isnot a significant fate process, based on the adsorption coefficients of 32

HR3QI3I6

Page 88: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

- 49 estimated from Lyman (1982). This information suggests that leachinginto groundwater is highly likely, and the dichloroethenes are often foundin groundwater (Barber 1988).

CARCINOGENIC TOXICITY:

No data for humans or animals suggest that 1,2-dichloroethene has carcinogenicpotency. In addition, microbiological assays have had negative results formutagenicity (USEPA 1991).

NONCARCIMOGEN1C TOXICITY:

In a 90-day study by Barnes et al. (1985), 24 male and 24 female mice were giventrans- 1,2 dichloroethene in their drinking water at levels of 0.1, 1.0 or 2.0mg/mL. Therefore, based on fluid consumption, the doses for males were 17, 175or 387 mg/kg/day and 23, 224 or 452 mg/kg/day for females. At the end of theexperiment, there were no changes in terminal body weight or gross pathologycaused by any dosage of trans- 1,2,-dichloroethene. In male mice, there weresignificant increases in serum alkaline phosphatase levels at the two higherdoses. Also in males at the highest dose, liver glutathiane concentrations weredecreased. In females, thymus weight and lung weight were depressed at thehigher doses. The level of 17 mg/kg/day was used as a NOAEL. From this an oralRfD of 2E-2 mg/kg/day was calculated using an uncertainty factor of 1000 toaccount for inter- and intraspecies variation and extrapolation from subchronicto chronic exposure (USEPA 1991).

Other bioassays have also shown toxic effects of 1,2-dichloroethene. Dose levelsexceeding 1000 mg/kg are lethal in rats and mice. Symptoms at these levelsinclude severe pulmonary hyperemia and aleolar septal distension, ataxia,depressed respiration and central nervous system depression (Barnes et al. 1985;Freundt et al. 1977, Hayes et. 1987). Effects noted at lower dose levels includeliver pathology (Freundt et al. 1977) and biochemical changes in the liver(Jenkins et al. 1972).

Page 89: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity: NO

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: 2E-2 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1000Inhalation Reference Dose: ND

REFERENCES:

Barber, L.B., II, E.M. Thurman, M.P. Schroeder, et al. 1988. Long-term fate oforganic micropollutants in sewage-contaminated groundwater. Environ SciTechnol 22: 205-211.

Barnes, E.W., W.M. Sanders, K.L. White, Jr., et al. 1985. Toxicology of trans-1,2-dichloroethylene in the mouse. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 8: 373-392.

Billing, W.L. 1977. Interphase transfer processes II. Evaporation rates ofchloroethanes, ethanes, ethylenes, propanes, and propylenes from diluteaqueous solutions. Comparison with theoretical predictions. Environ SciTechnol. 11: 405-409.

Drilling WL. 1977. Interphase transfer processes. II. Evaporation rates ofchloromethanes, ethanes, ethylenes, propanes, and propylenes from diluteaqueous solutions. Comparisons with theoretical predictions. Environ.Sci. Technol. 11: 405-409.

Filser, J.G., H.M. Bolt. 1979. Pharmacokinetics of halogenated ethylenes inrats. Arch Toxicol 42: 123-136.

Freundt KJ, Liebaldt GP, Liberwirth E. 1977. Toxicity studies on trans- 1,2-dichloroethene. Toxicity 7: 141-153.

Gossett, J.M. 1987. Measurements of Henry's Law constant for Cl and C2chlorinated hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Tech 21: 202-206.

Hawley GG. 1981. The condensed chemical dictionary. 10th ed. New York, NY:Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 335.

Hayes JR, Condie LW Jr., Egle JL Jr., et al. 1987. The acute and subchronictoxicity in rats of trans- 1,2-dichloroethene in drinking water. J AmColl Toxcicol 6: 471-478.

Horvath AL. 1982. Halogenated hydrocarbons solubility. - miscibility withwater. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc., 496-496.

Jenkins LJ Jr., Trabulus MJ, Murphy SD. 1972. Biochemical effects of 1,1-dichloroethylene in rats: Comparison with carbon tetrachloride and 1,2-dichloroethylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 23: 501-510.

Kawamura, K., I.R. Kaplan. 1983. Organic compounds in the rainwater of LosAngeles. Environ Sci Tech 17: 497-501.

Page 90: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Lyman WJ. 1982. Adsorption coefficient for soils and sediments. In: Handbookfor chemical property estimation methods. Lyman WJ. Reehl WF, RosenblattDH, eds. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book Co., Chapter 4.

Sato A, Nakajima T. 1979. A structure-activity relationship of somechlorinated hydrocarbons. Arch Environ Health 34: 69-75.

Stevens VI. 1979. 1,2-Dichloroethylene. In: Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia ofchemical technology, 3rd ed. Vol 5. Grayson M, Eskroth D, eds. New York,NY: John Wiley and Sons, 742-745.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Updated March 1991.

flR30)3j9

Page 91: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR MANGANESE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Manganese is a reddish-grey or silvery, brittlemetal having a molecular weight of 54.9 g/mol (Sax 1984) and belonging tothe first transition series of the periodic table. Manganese exists in 11oxidation states from -3 to +7. The most common form includes Mn 4+because of the important oxide Mn02; the +2 form which is stable in acids;and, the +7 valence which is found only in oxy-compounds (USEPA 1984).Most forms are soluble in dilute acids and react slowly in hot or coldwater (Weast 1980).

Molecular Formula: Mn

Absorption: Variable amounts of manganese are absorbed via thegastrointestinal tract, but averages around 3-5% (Davidson et al. 1988,1989; Mena et al. 1969). Low levels of iron in the diet appear to actsynergistically with magnesium uptake in the gastrointestinal system,possibly because these two elements are absorbed by the same transportsystem in the gut (Mena et al. 1969).

Fate: The fate of manganese in aquatic systems may be determined by itsability to undergo chemical and microbiological reactions. In mostnatural aquatic systems, manganese is expected to be present predominantlyin the suspended particulates and sediments as Mn02 and/or Mn304. A smallamount of manganese may remain as soluble Mn+2. By analogy with aquaticiron (USEPA 1981), the residence time of aquatic manganese may be a fewhundred years.

Both chemical and microbiological interactions may cause speciation ofmanganese in soils. Both soil pH and oxidation-reduction potential ofsoil may influence the speciation process. It has been suggested that inacid water-logged soils, manganese passes freely into solution and mayleach into groundwater. Manganese can be readily leached from wasteburial sites and from other natural soils into groundwater (USEPA 1982).

flR30i320

Page 92: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Manganese aerosol may be removed from the air environment through dry orwet precipitation. It has been estimated that the atmospheric residencetime for manganese due to such physical removal processes is about 7 days(Cutpitt 1980).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

No carcinogen slope factor was derived for oral and inhalation exposure formanganese because there was no significant increase in the incidence of cancerassociated with manganese administration (USEPA 1984). Using the criteria forevaluating the overall weight of evidence for carcinogenicity in humans proposedby the Carcinogen Assessment Group of the USEPA (Federal Register 1984),manganese is best designated a Group D, not classified, substance (ERA 1984).

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Excess manganese in the diet of animals depressed hemoglobin formation (Matrone,et al. 1959), interfered with hemoglobin regeneration (Hartman et al. 1955) andwas associated with decreased blood pressure and elevated serotonin blood levels(Kimura et al. 1978). When excess manganese was put in the drinking water of labanimals, there were ultrastructural changes in the liver. In monkey inhalationstudies, animals exposed to manganese for five months had mild tremors offingers, decreased pinch force and reduced dexterity of upper limbs that wereconsidered to be evidence of neurological damage analogous to humans sufferingform chronic manganese toxicity (Nishiyama et al. 1975).

Epidemiological studies have shown that very high doses (>11.5 mg/kg/day) ofmanganese dissolved in drinking water will cause problems with the centralnervous system (USEPA 1991). These toxic effects are thought to be intensifiedby increased water acidity and by the presence of iron. Chronic exposure tomanganese in drinking water resulted in extra-pyramidal dysfunction symptoms suchas lethargy, increased muscle tonus and spasms, and tremors and mentaldisturbances in 16 people (Kawamura et al. 1941). Elderly people seemed to bemost severely affected and children were least affected. Autopsy of one caseshowed atrophy of the globus palladium, disappearance of its neurons, moderatecongestion of the brain, spinal cord and meninges and meningeal edema (Kawamura

flR30!32l

Page 93: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

et al. 1941). Kawamura et al. (1941) reported the case of water consumption fromwells contaminated by manganese from dry cell batteries buried nearby. After theoutbreak of chronic manganese intoxication, water from the wells was tested andfound to contain 14.3 mg/1 of manganese. Over a period of 6 weeks, theconcentration was reported to decrease to 4.2 mg/1.

Oral exposure of humans to manganese has been associated with impotency (Penalver1955, Mena et al. 1967). In animals fed dietary manganese chronically,testicular and sex accessory organ weights were significantly decreased comparedto control mice.

The oral RfD of IxlO'1 mg/kg/day was computed using a NOAEL of 0.14 mg/kg/day forchronic human consumption of manganese. The uncertainty factor and modifyingfactor were assumed to be 1. This RfD was calculated considering a total dietaryintake of manganese. Because manganese from drinking water alone is morebioavailable, this level may not be acceptable in that case. Manganese is anessential human nutrient and the reported problems occurred at levels above 9mg/day (USEPA 1991, WHO 1973, Schroeder at al 1966, NRC 1989).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Weight-of-evidence: D; not classified as a human carcinogen.

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: IE-1 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1Critical Effect: central nervous system effects

REFERENCES:

Cutpitt, L.T. 1980. Fate of Toxic and Hazardous Materials in the AirEnvironment. U.S. EPA, ESRL, ORD, Environmental Sciences Research,Research Triangle Park, NC.

Davidson, L., Cederblad, A, Hagebo E, et al. 1988. Intrinsic and extrinsiclabeling for studies of manganese absorption in humans. J Nutr 118:1517-1524.

Davidsson, L, Cederblad, A, Lonnerdal, B, et al. 1989. Manganese retention inman: A method for estimating manganese absorption and man. Am J ClinNutr 49:170-179.

Page 94: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Federal Register. 1984. USEPA. Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogenic RiskAssessment. Federal Register 49:46294-46299.

Hartman, R.H., G. Matrone and G.H. Wise. 1955. Effect of high dietarymanganese on hemoglobin formation. J. Nutr. 57:429-439.

Kawamura, R., H. Ikuta, S. Fukuzumi, et al. 1941. Intoxication by Manganese in-Well Water. Kitasato Arch. Exp. Med. 18:145-169.

Kimura, M., N. Yagi and Y. Itokawa. 1978. Effect of subacute manganese feedingon serotonin metabolism in the rat. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 4:701-707.

Matrone, G., R.H. Hartman and A.J. Clawson. 1959. Studies of a manganese ironantagonism in the nutrition of rabbits and baby pigs. J. Nutr. 67:309-317.

Mena, I., 0. Marin, S. Fuenzalida and G.C. Cotzias. 1967. Chronic ManganesePoisoning: Clinical Picture and Manganese Turnover. Neurology. 17:128-136.

Mena, I., K. Horiuchi, K. Burke et al. 1969. Chronic manganese poisoning:Individual susceptibility and absorption of iron. Neurology 19:1000-1006.

Nishiyama, K., Y. Suzuki, N. Fujii, H. Yano, T. Miyai and K. Ohmishi. 1975.Effect of Long-Term Inhalation of Manganese Dusts. II. ContinuousObservation of the Respiratory Organs in Monkeys and Mice. Jap. J. Hyg.30:117.

NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed.Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council, National AcademyPress, Washington, DC. p. 230-235.

Penalver, R. 1955. Manganese Poisoning. The 1954 Ramazzini Oration. Ind. Med.Surg. 24:1-7.

Sax, Irving N. 1984. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicals. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Schroeder, HA, DD Balessa and IH Tipton. 1966. Essential trace metals in man:Manganese, a study in homeostasis. J. Chron. Dis. 19: 545-571.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1981. Multimedia Criteria forIron and Compounds. Environmental Criteria Assessment Office, Cincinnati,OH.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1982. Ambient Air QualityCriteria Document for Manganese. Environmental Criteria and AssessmentOffice, Cincinnati, OH.

3R30I323

Page 95: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Health Effects Assessmentfor Manganese (and Compounds). Prepared by the Office of Health andEnvironmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office,Cincinnati, OH, and Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,Washington, DC.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991 Integrated Risk InformationSystem (IRIS). Health Criteria and Assessment Office, Washington, DC.Revised March 1991.

Weast, R.C. 1980. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st ed. The ChemicalRubber Co., Cleveland, OH. p.824-25, B117, F24.

WHO (World Health Organization). 1973. Trace elements in human nutrition:Manganese. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Service,532 WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, p.34-36.

AR30I321*

Page 96: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR MERCURY

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Inorganic mercury is a silvery white metal whichoccurs as a liquid at room temperature (Weast 1981). It has a molecularweight of 200.59 g/mol, a vapor presence of 2 x 10"3, and a watersolubility of 0.056 mg/L at 25°C (Windholz 1983). USEPA (1980) hasestablished an MCL for mercury of 0.002 mg/1.

Fate: The speciation of mercury, its pH, redox conditions, and presenceof complexing ions are all factors influencing the environmental fate ofmercury (Rubin 1976). In acidic conditions, it will exist in compoundssuch as HgCl2 and under basic conditions as Hg (OH)2. Mercury is readilysorbed to soil organic matter, clays, and hydrous metal oxides.Bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms is also a significant fate process.BCF values for inorganic mercury range from 1,800 to 5,000 (USEPA 1985,USEPA 1990a). Mercury is biologically methylated and may volatilize fromsoils in small amounts (Lyman et al. 1987).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Mercury has not been show to cause cancer in humans. Bioassays involving ratshave demonstrated that local tumors do develop at the point of injection ofmetallic mercury (USEPA, 1984).

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Several studies on the toxic effects of ingestion of mercury have been performedon rats (Druet at al., 1978, Bernaudin et al., 1981, Andres, 1984, and USEPA,1987). The effects of concern include neurotoxicity and kidney effects. USEPA(1990b) has derived an oral reference dose of 3E-4 mg/kg/day based on dataobtained from these studies and using an uncertainty factor of 1000. Mercury hasalso been shown to have severe reproductive effects such as delaying nerve celldevelopment and mental retardation (Marsh 1987). A wide range of symptoms havebeen associated with long-term ingestion of mercury-contaminated fish, such as

Page 97: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

loss of motor control, behavioral changes, blindness, deafness, and death (USEPA1981).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Weight of Evidence: D, not a human carcinogen

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: 3.0E-4 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1000Critical Effect: neurotoxicity, kidney effects

REFERENCES:

Andres, P. 1984. IgA-IgG disease in the intestine of Brown Norway ratsingesting mercuric chloride. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 20:488-494.

Bernaudin, J.F., E. Druet, P. Druet and R. Masse. 1981. Inhalation or ingestionof organic or inorganic mercurials produces auto-immune disease in rats.Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 20:129-135.

Druet, P., E. Druet, F. Potdevin and C. Sapin. 1978. Immune typeglomerulonephritis induced by HgCl2 in the Brown Norway rat. Ann. Immunol.129C:777-792.

Lyman, W.L., I. Bodek, W.F. Reehl, and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1987. .Methods forEstimating 'Physicochemical Properties of Inorganic Chemicals ofEnvironmental Concern. U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command,Fort Detrick, MD. Contract No. DAMD 17-83-C-3274.

Rubin, A.J., Ed. 1976. Aqueous-Environmental Chemistry of Metals. An ArborScience Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1980. Ambient Water QualityDocument. USEPA 440/5-80 Series.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Health Effects Assessmentfor Mercury. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC,USEPA-540/1-80-042.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Ambient Aquatic Life WaterQuality Criteria for Mercury. Office of Research and Development, Duluth,Minn. PB85-22745.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1987. Peer Review Workshop onMercury Issues. October 26-27, 1987, Summary Report. EnvironmentalCriteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

HR30I326

Page 98: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Bioaccumulation of SelectedPollutants in Fish. A National Study Vol. II. Assessment and WatershedProtection Division. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, USEPA,Washington, DC. December 1990.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Health Effects AssessmentSummary Tables (HEAST). Fourth Quarter FY-1990. OSWER, USEPA.

Windholz, M., ed. 1976. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs,and Biologicals, 10th ed. Merck & Co., Rahway, New Jersey.

3R30I327

Page 99: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Methylene chloride is a colorless, volatile liquid• having a molecular weight of 84.93 g/mol (Sax 1984). Methylene chloride

is a member of the halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbon (purgeablehalocarbon) chemical class of compounds.

Molecular Formula: CH2C12

Fate: Evaporation is expected to be the predominant loss mechanism fromthe soil surface. In subsurface soil, biodegradation of a chlorinatedaliphatic hydrocarbon such as methylene chloride may be slow (Wilson etal. 1983). Therefore, in subsurface soil, the nongraded methylenechloride is expected to leach into groundwater. In the atmosphere,methylene chloride is primarily removed by photochemical reactions (NLM,1987; Cox et al. 1976; Davis et al. 1976).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Pertinent data regarding carcinogenicity in humans associated with methylenechloride could not be located in the available literature (USEPA 1984). NPT(1985) performed a cancer bioassay and found the following: 1) inhalation ofmethylene chloride vapors was associated with an increased incidence of benignmammary gland neoplasms and primarily fibroadenomas in rats; 2) a significantincrease in hepatocellular neoplastic modules and hepatocellular carcinomas infemale rats; 3) a statistically significant increase in mesotheliomas (primarilyin the tunica vaginal is) in male rats, and 4) a significant increase in adrenalpheochromocytomas and interstititial cell tumors in male rats and combinedincidence of pituitary gland adenomas and carcinomas in male and female rats(USEPA 1985, 1984). In mice, the NTP (1985) concluded that there was someevidence supporting carcinogenicity for methylene chloride for male rats as shownby increased incidence of benign neoplasms of the mammary gland; there was clearevidence of the carcinogenicity of methylene chloride for female rats as shownby an increased incidence of benign neoplasms of the mammary gland; there was

4R30I328

Page 100: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

clear evidence for the carcinogenicity in male and female mice as shown by anincreased incidence of lung and liver tumors. Methylene chloride has been shownto be mutagenic to Salmonella tvphimurium (Simmon, et al. 1977). Thilager andKumaroo (1983) observed extensive chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinesehamster ovarian cells exposed to methylene chloride.

Based on the above studies, USEPA (1985b, 1986c) calculated an oral slope factorof 7.5E-3 (mg/kg/day)"1 and an inhalation slope factor of 1.4E-2 (mg/kg/day)'1.Methylene chloride is considered a probable human carcinogen (Group B2).

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

In humans, chronic inhalation of methylene chloride resulted in somnolence,lassitude, anorexia and mild lightheadedness, disturbed central nervous systemfunction and depression (MAS, 1978). In chronic inhalation exposure of animalsto methylene chloride, Burek, et al. (1980, 1984) and Dow Chemical Company (1980)found rats suffered from a disease believed to be sialodacryoadenitis (atransient viral involvement of the salivary glands), increased liver weights,histopathologic alterations of the liver, an increased incidence ofhepatocellular vacuolization indicative of fatty degeneration, multinucleatedhepatocytes (a spontaneous geriatric change in female rats), a significantincrease in the number of foci of altered hepatocytes, hepatocellular necrosisand coagulation necrosis. A chronic inhalation study (Nitschke et al. 1988)involving rats inhaling 200 ppm, 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 2 years was usedto derive an inhalation reference dose of 8.6E-1 mg/kg/day with an uncertaintyfactor of 100 (USEPA 1990).

A 24-month drinking water study (National Coffee Association 1982) derived aNOAEL for methylene chloride of 6.47 mg/kg/day based on a female rat study. Thetarget organ was identified as the liver. An oral reference dose of 6.0E-2mg/kg/day was derived based on this study using an uncertainty factor of 100(USEPA 1990).

HR3QI329

Page 101: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 7.5E-3 (mg/kg/day)'1Inhalation Slope Factor: 1.4E-2 (mg/kg/day)"1Weight of Evidence: B2

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose 6.0E-2 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 100Inhalation Reference Dose: 8.6E-1 mg/kg/dayInhalation Uncertainty Factor: 100

REFERENCES:

Burek, J.D., K.D. Nitschke, T.J. Bell, et al. 1980. Methylene Chloride: A Two-Year Inhalation Toxicity and Oncogenicity Study in Rats and Hamsters.Final Report. Toxicology Research Laboratory, Health and EnvironmentalSciences, Dow Chemical USA, Midland, MI 49640. Co-sponsored by DiamondShamrock Corp., Dow Chemical, Co., Imperial Chemical Industry Ltd.,Stauffer Chemical Co., and Vulcan Materials Co.

Burek, J.D., K. D. Nitschke, T.J. Bell, et al. 1984. Methylene Chloride: ATwo-Year Inhalation Toxicity and Oncogenicity Study in Rats and Hamsters.Fund Appl. Toxicol. 4(1):30.

Cox, R.A., R.C. Denwent, A.E.J. Eggleton and J.E. Lovelock. 1976. Photochemicaloxidation of halocarbons in the troposphere. Atmos. Environ. 10:305-308.

Davis, D.D., G. Machado, B. Conaway, Y. Oh and R. Watson. 1976. A temperaturedependent Kinetics study of the reaction of OH with CH0C1, CH2C12 and CH3.Br. J. Chem. Phys. 65(4):1268-1274.

Dow Chemical Co. 1980. Methylene Chloride. A Two-Year Inhalation Toxicity andOncogenicity Study in Rats and Hamsters. FYI-OTS-0281-0097. Follow-UpResponse A. USEPA, Office of Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.

NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1978. Nonfluorinated Halomethanes in theEnvironment. Washington, DC.

National Coffee Association. 1982. 24-North Chronic Toxicity and OncogenicityStudy of Methylene Chloride in Rats. Final Report. Prepared by Hazel tonLaboratories America, Inc., Vienna, VA.

Nitschke, K.D., J.D. Bured, T.J. Bell et al. 1988. Methylene Chloride: A. 2-year inhalation toxicity and Oncogenicity study in rats. Fund. Appl.Toxicol.

NLM (National Library of Medicine). 1987. Hazardous Substance Data Bank.Report No. 66. Computer Printout.

Page 102: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

NTP (National Toxicology Program). (1985, Feb). NTP Technical Report on thetoxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Dichloromethane in F344/N Ratsand B6C3F1 Mice/Inhalation Studies. NTP TR 306. Board draft.

Sax, Irving I. 1984. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicals. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Simmon, V.F., et al. 1977. Mutagenic Activity of Chemicals Identified inDrinking Water: In: Progress in Genetic Toxicology, S. Scott, et al., Ed.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Health Effects Assessmentof Methylene Chloride. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment,Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH; Office ofSolid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC. USEPA/540/1-867/028.NTIS PB 86-134392.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Addendum to the HealthAssessment Document for Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride), UpdatedCarcinogenicity Assessment of Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride).Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. USEPA/600/8-82/004F.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1986c. Integrated RiskInformation System (IRIS). Carcinogenicity Assessment for LifetimeExposure to Methylene Chloride. On-line. (Verification date 12/04/86.)Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria andAssessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Health Effects AssessmentSummary Tables (HEAST). Fourth Quarter FY-1990. OSWER, USEPA.

Wilson, J.T., J.F. McNabb, B.H. Wilson, and M.J. Noonan. 1983.Biotransformation of Selected Organic Pollutants in Groundwater. Dev.Ind. Microbiol. 24:255-233.

HR3QI33I

Page 103: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR TETRACHLOROETHENE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Tetrachloroethane is a member of the halogenatedaliphatic hydrocarbon (purgeable halocarbon) chemical class of compounds.Tetrachloroethane has a molecular weight of 165.83 g/mol (USEPA 1988).

Molecular Formula: C2CL4

Absorption: Tetrachloroethene is almost completely absorbed by thegastrointestinal tract. One study involving an oral dose oftetrachloroethene found that 98% of the dose was eliminated in expired airand 2% in urine of rats (Daniel 1963). A second study using a dose of 500mg/kg tetrachloroethene found that 85% of the dose was eliminated inexpired air and 12% in urine of mice (Schumann et al. 1980). For humans,tetrachloroethene is readily absorbed by the lungs (von Oettingen 1964).

Fate: Tetrachloroethene is primarily removed from the atmosphere byphotochemical reactions. Tetrachloroethene is removed from surface watersand surface soils by volatilization. Tetrachloroethene is very mobile insoil and is expected to leach into groundwater (NLM 1987).Tetrachloroethene may undergo dechlorination reactions through microbialbiodegradation to form trichloroethene.

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

NCI (1977) in an oral carcinogenic bioassay administered various levels oftetrachloroethene in corn oil by gavage to Osborne-Mendol rats and mice. Thestudy ran 5 days/week for 78 weeks. In both species, decreased survival rateswere observed. Of the rats treated, no increases in tumor incidence wereobserved. However, of the mice treated, there were significant increases inhepatocellular carcinomas. Based on this study, an oral slope factor of 5.1E-2(mg/kg/day)"1 was derived (USEPA 1990). Evidence of carcinogenicity oftetrachloroethene cited by NTP (1986) showed an increased incidence of

/1R30I332

Page 104: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

mononuclear cell leukemia in F344/N male and female mice, uncommon renal tubularcell neoplasms for F344/N male mice, and increased evidence of hepatocellularadenomas and carcinomas for either sex of B6C3F1 mice following inhalationexposure. USEPA (1990) derived an inhalation slope factor of 3.3E-3 (mg/kg/day)'1 based on results of this study.

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Bruben and O'Flaherty (1985) administered tetrachloroethene in corn oil to maleSwiss-Cox mice by gavage in doses of 0, 20, 100, 200, 500, 1500, and 2000 mg/kg,5 days/week for 6 weeks. Several hepatotoxic effects were observed including:increased liver weight/body weight ratio, decreased DNA content, increased livertriglycerides, and increased SGPT. An oral reference dose of IE-2 mg/kg/day was

.calculated based on the above study (USEPA 1991).

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 5.1 E-2 (mg/kg/day)"1Inhalation Slope Factor: 3.3 E-3 (mg/kg/day)"1Weight-of-Evidence: 82

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: IE-2 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1000Critical Effect: Hepatotoxicity in mice, weight gain in rats

REFERENCES:

Buben, J.A. and E.J. O'Flaherty. 1985. Delineation of the role of metabolism inthe hepatotoxicity of trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene: A dose -effect study. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 78:105-122.

Daniel, J.W. 1963. The metabolism of Cl-labeled trichloroethylene andtetrachlorbethylene in the rat. Biochem. Pharmacol. 12:795-801.

NCI (National Cancer Institute). 1977. Bioassay of Tetrachloroethylene forPossible Carcinogenicity. NCI Carcinogenesis Tech. Rep. Ser. No. NCI-CGTR-13. [Also publ. as DHHS (NIH) 77-813].

NLM (National Library of Medicine). 187. Hazardous Substance Data Base. RecordNo. 124:on-line.

NTP (National Toxicology Program). 1986. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studiesof tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene) in F344/N rats and B6C31 mice(inhalation studies). NTP Tech. Report Series No. 311.

«R30I333

Page 105: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Schumann, A.M., J.F. Quast and P.G. Watanabe. 1980. The pharmacokinetics andmacromolecular interactions of perchloroethylene in mice and rats asrelated to oncogenicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 55:207-219.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Health Effects AssessmentSummary Tables (HEAST). Fourth Quarter FY-1990. OSWER, USEPA.

von Oettingen, W.R. 1964. The Halogenated Hydrocarbons of Industrial andToxicological Importance. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, p. 271-283.

BR30I33I4

Page 106: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR TRICHLOROETHENE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Trichloroethene is a halogenated aliphatichydrocarbon with a molecular weight of 131.4 g/mol (USEPA 1988). Thevapor pressure for trichloroethene is 57.9 mmHg and the water solubilityis 1100 mg/L both at 20°C (Callahan et al., 1979). The reported Log Kowis 2.42 from Hansch and Leo (1985). The Koc value has been determined torange from 87-150 (NLM 1987).

Absorption: Rats and mice, given doses ranging 10-2000 mgtrichloroethene/kg in corn oil by gavage, showed a 92-100% absorptionafter 24-72 hours of exposure. This percentage was determined aftermeasuring the radioactivity in the urine, feces, expired air, andcarcasses (Prout et al. 1985). In humans, rapid absorption oftrichloroethene by the lungs occurs, and complete tissue equilibrium isachieved after -8 hours of exposure (USEPA 1985).

Fate: Reaction with photochemically generated hydroxyl radicals is theprimary mechanism of removal of trichloroethene from the atmosphere.Phosgene, dichlorocetyl chloride, and formyl chloride are products of thisreaction. Trichloroethene degrades in hours in photochemical smogsituations (NLM 1987). Trichloroethene also may undergo dechlorinationreaction via microbial biodegradation to form 1,2-dichloroethene.Trichloroethene volatilizes in water and neither bioaccumulation inaquatic organisms nor adsorption to sediments are expected to be importantfate processes (NLM 1987).

Based on its Koc and a retardation factor of soil mobility of 1.6,trichloroethene is considered to be fairly mobile in soil (Wilson et al.1981). Leaching from soil into groundwater is a significant route fortrichloroethene (NLM 1987). Volatilization from soil is also expected,though this would be slower than volatilization from water (Wilson et al.1981).

AR30I335

Page 107: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Oral: NCI (1976) performed a bioassay in which groups of 50 or each sex of ratsand mice were given trichloroethene by gavage over a 78-week period. Asignificant increase in hepatocellular carcinomas was noted in males at low andhigh dose levels and in females at the high dose level. NTP (1982) alsoperformed a gavage study with two different dosages on similar numbers of ratsfor 103 weeks. Males given the higher dosage had a significant increase in renaladenocarcinomas. Results from a single-dose gavage bioassay on mice were alsopublished with this study (NTP, 1982). Again there was a significant increasein the incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas for males and females, which helpsto support the NCI (1976) study. Based on the geometric means for risk estimatesextrapolated to humans for both of these studies, USEPA (1988) derived an oralslope factor of 1.1E-2 (mg/kg/day)"1.

Inhalation: In a study by Fukada et al. (1983) mice which were exposed tovarying levels of trichloroethene for more than one year showed an increase inlung adenocarcinomas. Maltoni et al. (1986) performed a similar study in whichthey observed a significant dose-related increase in testicular Leydig cellcarcinomas, leukemia, and renal tumors in male rats. Increased hepatomas andlung tumors were noted in mice (Maltoni 1986). USEPA (1988) used the geometricmeans of the risk estimates form the results for mice in the two studiesdiscussed above to derive an inhalation slope factor of 1.7E-2 (mg/kg/day)"1.The data from mice were used because the results were seen in many mice strainsand in both sexes.

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

A chronic bioassay study of trichloroethene performed on rats showed a decreasein body weights and a decrease in survival. The same experiment was performedon mice which showed no effects of chronic exposure to trichloroethene (NCI1976). Similar studies by NTP (1982, 1986) showed comparable results to the NCIstudy with dose-related responses using doses ranging from 0-1000 mg/kgtrichloroethene. A subchronic inhalation study in rats showed an elevation ofliver weight to occur following exposure to 55 ppm, 5 days/week for 14 weeks(Kimmerle and Eben 1973). USEPA (1987) derived an oral reference dose (RfD) of

Page 108: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

7.35 x 10'3 mg/kg/day based on results of this study and using an uncertaintyfactor of 1000. This RfD is currently under review for verification by ECAO.Because trichloroethene is the primary contaminant for the Butz Landfill site,the use of this tentative RfD is important to evaluate potential noncarcinogeniceffects for the site.

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:. Oral Slope Factor: 1.1E-2 (mg/kg/day)'1

Inhalation Slope Factor: 1.7E-2 (mg/kg/day)'1Weight-of-Evidence: B2

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Reference Dose: 7.35E-2 mg/kg/dayOral Uncertainty Factor: 1000

REFERENCES:

Callahan, M.A., M.W. Slimak, N.W. Gabel, et al. 1979. Water-RelatedEnvironmental fate of 129 Priority Pollutants, Vol. II. USEPA, Office ofWater Planning and Standards, Office of Water and Waste Management,Washington, DC. USEPA 440/4-79-029b.

Fukuda, K., K. Takemoto and H. Tsuruta. 1983. Inhalation carcinogenicity oftrichlorethylene in mice and rats. Ind. Health. 21: 243-254.

Hansch C. and A.J. Leo. 1985. MedChem Project Issue No. 26, Pomona College,Claremont, CA.

Kimmerle G. and A. Eben. 1973. Metabolism, excretion and toxicology oftrichloroethene after inhalation. 1. Experimental exposure on rat, Arch.Toxicol. 30: 115.

Maltoni, C., G. Lefemine and G. Cotti. 1986. Experimental research ontrichloroethylene carcinogenesis. Arch. Res. Industrial CarcinogenesisSeries. C. Maltoni and M.A. Mehlman, Ed. Vol. V. Princeton ScientificPubl. Co. Inc., Princeton, NY. 393pp. (Cited in USEPA, 1987)

NCI (National Cancer Institute). 1976. Bioassay of Trichlorethylene. NCICarcinogenesis Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 2.. 197 p. [Also publ. as DHEW (NIH)76-802]

NLM (National Library of Medicine). 1987. National Library of MedicineHazardous Substance Data Base. Report No. 133. On line.

NTP' (National Toxicology Program). 1982. Carcinogenesis bioassay oftrichloroethylene. NTP Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 81-84. [Also published as NIH82-1799.] (Cited in USEPA, 1985)

flR30)337

Page 109: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

NTP (National Toxicology Program). 1986. NTP Board Draft Technical Report onthe Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Trichloroethylene in FourStrains of Rats (ACI, August, Marshall, Osborne-Mendel) (Gavage Studies).NTP Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 273. [Also published as NIH 86-2529.]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Health Assessment Documentfor Trichloroethene. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment,Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research Triangle Park, N.C.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1987. Health Advisory forTrichlororethene. Office of Drinking Water, Washington, D.C. March 31,1987.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1988. Health Effects Assessmentfor Trichloroethylene. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment,Cincinnati, OH.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Subsurface ContaminationReference Guide. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,D.C.

Wilson, J.T., C.G. Enfield, W.J. Dunlop, R.L. Cosby, D.A. Foster and L.B.Baskin. 1981. Transport and Fate of Selected Pollutants in a StudySoil. J. Environ. Qua!. 10: 501-506.

3R301338

Page 110: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TOXICITY PROFILE FOR VINYL CHLORIDE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION:

Chemical Properties: Vinyl chloride is a member for the halogenatedaliphatic hydrocarbon class of compounds. This compound has a molecularweight of 62.5 g/mol and a vapor pressure of 2660 mm Hg at 25°C (Calahanet al. 1979). The water solubility of vinyl chloride ranges from 2760mg/1 at 25'C (Horvath 1982) to 1100 mg/kg at 28°C (USEPA 1980).

Absorption: Rapid absorption of vinyl chloride form the gastrointestinaltract into the blood has been documented by Withey (1976) and Watanabe etal. (1976), however, no quantitative data are available. Sufficientquantitative data are available to suggest rapid absorption andequilibration of vinyl chloride from the lungs into the blood stream.Rats exposed to 20,000 ppm for five minutes were found to have vinylchloride permeating several tissues 10 minutes later (Duprat et al. 1977).In addition, Withey and Collins (1976) found that inhalation of 1.97 ppmvinyl chloride was equivalent to gavage treatment with 4.5 mg/kg/day.

Fate: The half-life of vinyl chloride in air has been shown to be 1.2days (Singh et al. 1981). In water, the half-life has been estimated torange from several minutes to five days (Callahan et al. 1979). The half-lives for vinyl chloride in water have been derived based on thereaeration ratio (0.675) and the oxygen reaeration rate of 0.19-0.96 day-1(Mabey et al. 1981). The fate of vinyl chloride in soil is not known withcertainty. Evaporation is expected to be the predominant loss mechanism(Callahan 1979).

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

USEPA (1990) derived an oral slope factor of 1.9 (mg/kg/day)"1 based on an oralbioassay performed on rats by Feron et al. (1981). A group of 60 male and 60.female rats were given polyvinyl chloride powder (not containing more than 0.3ppm) in their diets or by gavage. Polyvinyl chloride powder acted as a liquidcarrier for vinyl chloride monomer. The feeding trials lasted 135 weeks for the

AR30I339

Page 111: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

male rats and 144 weeks for the female rats. At 80 weeks of treatment, doserelated decrease in survival was reported as well as, for both sexes, anincreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas and lung and liverangiocarcinomas.

Infante (1981) reviewed epidemiological data concerning humans inhaling vinylchloride. Data recovered indicates an association between the inhalationexposure to vinyl chloride and the occurrence of liver cancer, brain cancer, andlung cancer. Waxweiler et al. (1976) reported a small rise in the frequency ofliver, lung, and brain cancer in workers exposed to vinyl chloride. Maltoni(1977b) performed a bioassay on Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to vinyl chloride byinhalation. Maltoni reported an increased incidence of hepatic angiosarcoma andrenal nephroblastomas. USEPA (1985), based on the above studies, calculated aninhalation slope factor of 2.95E-1 (mg/kg/day)"1.

NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS:

Feron et al. (1981) performed a study on rats in which they were administered avinyl chloride monomer. Rats had increased liver size, decreased adrenal size,and decreased number of leukocytes in males. There was decreased blood sugar inboth sexes. Also, with dietary levels of vinyl chloride at doses of 0, 1.7, 5.0,and 14.1 mg/kg/day as determined by measured food consumption, a dose relatedincrease in mortality was reported, with decreased survival at all dose levels.No noncarcinogenic toxicity criteria have been derived for vinyl chloride.

SUMMARY OF TOXICITY CRITERIA:

Carcinogenic Toxicity:Oral Slope Factor: 1.9 (mg/kg/day)'1Inhalation Slope Factor: 2.95E-1 (mg/kg/day)'1Weight of Evidence: A

Noncarcinogenic Toxicity: ND

REFERENCES:

Calahan, M.A., M.W. Slimak, N.W. Gabel et al., 1979. Water-relatedenvironmental fate of 129 priority pollutants. Vol. II. Office of WaterPlanning and Standards, Office of Water and Waste Management, USEPA,Washington, O.C.

Page 112: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Duprat, P., et al., 1977. Metabolic approach to industrial poisoning: Bloodkinetics and distribution of 14-C vinyl chloride monomer (VCM). Toxicol.Pharmacol. Suppl. 142.

Feron, V.J., C.F.M. Hendriksen, A.J. Speek, H.P. Til and B.J. Spit. 1981.Lifespan oral toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats. Food Cosmet.Toxicol. 19: 317-333.

Horvath, A.L. 1982. Halogenated Hydrocarbons Solubility. Miscibility withwater. Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY. p. 494.

Infante, P.F. 1981. Observations of the site-specific carcinogenicity of vinylchloride to humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 41: 89.

Mabey, W.R., J.H. Smith,. R.T. Rodoll, et al., 1981. Aquatic Fate Process Datafor Organic Priority Pollutants. Monitoring and Data Support Division,Office of Water Regulation and Standards, Washington, D.C.

Maltoni, C. 1977b. Recent findings on the carcinogenicity of chlorinatedolefins. Environ. Health Perspect. 21: 1-5.

Singh, H.B., L.J. Salas, A.J. Smith and H. Shigeishi. 1981. Measurements ofsome potentially hazardous organic chemicals in urban environments.Atmos. Environ. 15: 601-612.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Health Effects Assessmentsfor Vinyl Chloride. Office Research and Development. Office of Health anEnvironmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1984. Review of acarcinogenicity study on vinyl chloride. Prepared by the CarcinogenAssessment Group, OHEA, Washington, DC for the Office of Drinking Water.Washington, DC. Memorandum from Larry Anderson and Steven Bayard toJoseph Cotruvo. January 6.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1985. Drinking Water CriteriaDocument for Vinyl Chloride. Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC.Final Draft.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990. Health Effects AssessmentSummary Tables. September 1990.

Watanabe, P.G., G.R. McGowan and P.J. Gehring. 1976a. Fate of (UC) vinylchloride after single oral administration in rats. Toxicol Appl.Pharmacol. 36: 339-352.

Waxweiler, R.J., W. Stringer, J.K. Wagoner, J. Jones, H. Falk, and C. Carter.1976. Neoplastic risk among workers exposed to vinyl chloride. Ann. NYAcad. Sci. 271: 40-48.

Withey, J.R. 1976. Pharmacodynamics and uptake of vinyl chloride monomeradministered by various routes to rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1:381-394.

Page 113: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

Withey, J.R. and B.T. Collins, 1976. A statistical Assessment of thequantitative uptake of vinyl chloride monomer for aqueous solutions. J.Toxicol. Environ. Health. 2:311.

Page 114: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

£830131*3

Page 115: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-2

NO ACTION WITH MONITORING

DIRECTITEM______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Ground Water Monitoring - BiannuallyDirect Capital • -0-

Annual O&Msampling & travel (2 days@ $2,000/day for 3 people) 8,00055 gal. disposal carbon units

(direct cost plus disposal) , 10,000laboratory analysis (3 shallow

and 3 deep wells @ $4,000 ea.) 48,000QA/QC sampling (3 @ $4,000 ea.) 24,000laboratory coordination, data validation,

data evaluation, and report preparation 15,000

Total Direct Capital Costs . $ -0-

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 105,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services 30,000

Legal & Administrative 20,000Contingency 20,000 20,000

Total Capital $ 70,000

Total Annual O&M $ 125,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 1.321.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 1,391,000

Page 116: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-3

GROUND WATER - INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS

DIRECT DIRECTITEM____________________ CAPITAL COST 1997

Institutional Controls & Deed RestrictionsDirect Capital -0- -0-

Total Direct Capital Costs -0- -0-Remedial Action & Remedial Design

Consulting Services 25,000Legal & Administrative 50,000Contingency 50,000

Total Capital Cost $ 125,000

Institutional Controls Review in 1997 $ 20,000

Present Worth of Future Cost(8 % % for 5 years) $ 13.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 138,000

Page 117: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. il30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4A

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM_______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Bedrock Aquifer Extraction Well SystemDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.5 acre foraccess & pipes) 4,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000piping to treatment plant (800 LF @ $20/LF) 16,0006" <p well installation, * 150 feet deep

(5 wells <a $15,000 ea.) 75,000decontamination; disposal of cuttings &

water (5 @ $6,000 ea.) 30,000electrical power (5 @ $2,000 ea.) 10,000electrical equipment, controls, 15 gpm

pumps, pit-less adaptor, low watershut-off, etc. (5 (<> $7,000 ea.) 35,000

$ 172,000Annual O&M

power (5 @ $2,000 ea.) 10,000equipment replacement 5,000

$ 15,000

Site Work/Road to Treatment PlantDirect Capital

1,500 LF & $50/LF $ 75,000

Chemical Precipitation System - 75 gpmDirect Capital $ 500,000

Annual O&Mequipment replacement

and sludge disposal $ 20,000

Page 118: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4A

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM___________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Air Stripping Towers and Vapor Phase Carbon - 75 gpraDirect Capital - based on 25 mg/2 VOC Influent

System: two towers ea. 2' $ 26 ft. talltowers, two vapor phase carbon units,dual heaters, two blower, two pumps,2,000 gallon flow equalization tank,control panel, and installation 250,000

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre) 3,000tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000building 60,000electrical power supply from North Road 40,000

$ 355,000Annual O&M

equipment replacement, power,and carbon regeneration or disposal $ 140,000

Stream DischargeDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre foraccess & pipes) 3,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000pipe (500 LF (<> S70/LF) 35,000

$ 40,000

Annual O&Mstream monitoring ($4,000/month) $ 48,000laboratory coordination, data validation,

data evaluation, and report preparation 36,000

Sub Total $ 1,162,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 116,000

$ 84,000

Start Up $ 20,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 1,278,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 259,000

flR30l3i*7

Page 119: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4A

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

SUMMARY

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 1,278,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 259,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (40%) 511,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 320,000Contingency (25%) 320,000 65,000

Total Capital $ 2,429,000

Total Annual O&M $ 324,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) S 3.425.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 5,854,000

Page 120: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4B

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Bedrock Aquifer Extraction Well SystemDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.5 acre foraccess & pipes) 4,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000piping to treatment plant (800 LF @ $20/LF) 16,0006" 0 well installation, ~ 150 feet deep

(5 wells & $15,000 ea.) 75,000decontamination; disposal of cuttings &

water (5 @ $6,000 ea.) 30,000electrical power (5 @ $2,000 ea.) 10,000electrical equipment, controls, 15 gpm

pumps, pit-less adaptor, low watershut-off, etc. (5 @ $7,000 ea.) 35,000

$ 172,000Annual O&M

power (5 @ $2,000 ea.) 10,000equipment replacement 5,000

$ 15,000

Site Work/Road to Treatment PlantDirect Capital

1,500 LF 9 $50/LF $ 75,000

Chemical Precipitation System - 75 gpmDirect Capital $ 500,000Annual O&M

equipment replacementand sludge disposal $ 20,000

Page 121: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4B

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM_______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) - 75 gpmDirect Capital - based on 25 mg/2 influent

System: two skids, equalization tank,control panel, transfer pump, twoGAC units in series, installation 300,000

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre) 3,000tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000building 70,000electrical power supply from North Road 40,000

$ 415,000Annual O&M

equipment replacement, power,and carbon regeneration/replacement $ 200,000

Stream DischargeDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre foraccess & pipes) 3,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000pipe (500 LF 9 $70/LF) $ 35,000

$ 40,000

Annual O&Mstream monitoring ($4,000/month) • $ 48,000laboratory coordination, data validation,

data evaluation, and report preparation 36,000

Sub Total $ 1,222,000

Direct Capital Contingency (1-0%) 122,000

$ 84,000

Start Up $ 20,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 1,344,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 319,000

AR30I350

Page 122: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-4B

GROUND WATER CONTAINMENT, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM_______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

SUMMARY

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 1,344,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 319,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (40%) 538,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 336,000Contingency (25%) 336,000 80,000

Total Capital $ 2,554,000

Total Annual O&M $ 399,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 4.217.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 6,771,000

8

3R30I35I

Page 123: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5A

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM_________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Bedrock Aquifer Extraction Well SystemDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (3.0 acre foraccess & pipes) 20,000

tree removal (1.5 acre) 10,000piping to treatment plant (6,400 LF @ $20/LF) 128,0006" 0 well installation, = 150 feet deep

(15 wells 0 $15,000 ea.) 225,000decontamination; disposal of cuttings &

water (15 0 $6,000 ea.) 90,000electrical power (15 @ $3,000 ea.) 45,000electrical equipment, controls, 15 gpm

pumps, pit-less adaptor, low watershut-off, etc. (15 9 $7,000 ea.) 105,000

$ 623,000Annual O&M

power (15 @ $2,000 ea.) 30,000equipment replacement 15,000

$ 45,000

Site Work/Road to Treatment PlantDirect Capital

1,500 LF 0 $50/LF $ 75,000

Chemical Precipitation System - 225 gpmDirect Capital $ 1,000,000

Annual O&Mequipment replacement

and sludge disposal $ 60,000

AR30I352

Page 124: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5A

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM__________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Air Stripping Towers and Vapor Phase Carbon - 225 gpmDirect Capital - based on 25 mg/£ VOC influent

System: two towers ea. 4' 0 26 ft. talltowers, two vapor phase carbon units,dual heaters, two blower, two pumps,5,000 gallon flow equalization tank,control panel, and installation 450,000

clearing & grubbing (0.5 acre) 5,000tree removal (0.5 acre) 3,000building 150,000electrical power supply from North Road 40,000

$ 648,000Annual O&M

equipment replacement,power, and carbon regenerationor disposal $ 260,000

Stream DischargeDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre foraccess & pipes) 3,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000pipe (500 LF @ $80/LF) $ 40,000

Sub Total $ 2,431,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 243,000

$ 45,000

Annual O&Mstream monitoring ($4,000/month) $ 48,000laboratory coordination, data validation,

data evaluation, and report preparation 36,000

$ 84,000Start Up $ 40,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,674,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 449,000

10

SR30J353

Page 125: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5A

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY AIR STRIPPING, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

SUMMARY

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,674,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 449,000

Remedial Action & Remedial Design •Consulting Services (40%) 1,070,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 669,000Contingency (25%) 669,000 112,000

Total Capital $ 5,082,000

Total Annual O&M $ 561,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 \ % for 30 years) $ 5.930.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 11,012,000

11

Page 126: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5B

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM__________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Bedrock Aquifer Extraction Well SystemDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (3.0 acre foraccess & pipes) 20,000

tree removal (1.5 acre) 10,000piping to treatment plant (6,400 LF @ $20/LF) 128,0006" 0 well installation, = 150 feet deep

(15 wells @ $15,000 ea.) 225,000decontamination; disposal of cuttings &

water (15 9 $6,000 ea.) 90,000electrical power (15 @ $3,000 ea.) 45,000electrical equipment, controls, 15 gpm

pumps, pit-less adaptor, low watershut-off, etc. (15 @ $7,000 ea.) 105,000

$ 623,000Annual O&M

power (15 (a $2,000 ea.) 30,000equipment replacement 15,000

$ 45,000

Site Work/Road to Treatment PlantDirect Capital

1,500 LF @ $50/LF $ 75,000

Chemical Precipitation System - 225 gpmDirect Capital $ 1,000,000

Annual O&Mequipment replacement

and sludge disposal $ 60,000

12

AR30I355

Page 127: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5B

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM_________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) - 225 gpraDirect Capital - based on 25 mg/JH influent

System: four skids, equalization tank,control panel, transfer pump, twoGAC units in series and two inparallel, installation 600,000

clearing & grubbing (0.5 acre) 5,000tree removal (0.5 acre) 3,000building 150,000electrical power supply from North Road 40,000

$ 798,000Annual O&M

power, equipment replacement,and carbon regeneration/replacement $ 500,000

Stream DischargeDirect Capital

clearing & grubbing (0.25 acre foraccess & pipes) 3,000

tree removal (0.25 acre) 2,000pipe (500 LF 9 $80/LF) $ 40,000

$ 45,000Annual O&M

stream monitoring ($4,000/month) $ 48,000laboratory coordination,,data validation,

data evaluation, and report preparation 36,000$ 84,000

Start Up $ 40,000

Sub Total $ 2,581,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 258,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,839,000Total Annual O&M Costs $ 689,000

13

1356

Page 128: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE GW-5B

GROUND WATER PLUME COLLECTION, TREATMENT BY CARBON ADSORPTION, AND DISPOSAL

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&H

SUMMARY

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,839,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 689,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (40%) 1,136,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 710,000Contingency (25%) 710,000 172,000

Total Capital $ 5,395,000

Total Annual O&M $ 861,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 9.100.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 14,495,000

14

SR30I357

Page 129: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-2

LANDFILL - INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS

DIRECT DIRECTITEM______________________ CAPITAL COST 1997

Institutional Controls & Deed RestrictionsDirect Capital -0- -0-

Total Direct Capital Costs -0- -0-

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services 20,000

Legal & Administrative 40,000Contingency 50,000

Total Capital Cost $ 110,000

Institutional Controls Review in 1997 $ 10,000

Present Worth of Future Cost(8 % % for 5 years) $ 7.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 117,000

15

4R30I358

Page 130: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-3

SOIL CAP RESTORATION AND MAINTENANCE

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Landfill Repair & MaintenanceDirect Capital

soil borings (100 @ $50 ea.) 5,000soil (4,000 cy @ $50/cy) 200,000seed, mulch, fertilizer

(5 acres @ $15,000/acre) 75,000

Annual O&Msite review and repair 10,000mowing grass (10 times/year @ $1,500 ea.) 15,000

Sub Total $ 280,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 28,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 308,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 25,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (30%) 92,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 77,000Contingency (25%) 77,000 6,000

Total Capital $ 554,000

Total Annual O&M $ 31,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 328.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 882,000

16

AR30I359

Page 131: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-4

PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL CAP

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Municipal Landfill CapDirect Capital

Mobilization/demobilization/decon pad 100,000site clearing (8 acres @ $6,000/acre) 48,000tree removal (3 acres @ $3,000/acre) 9,000trash relocation (5,000 cy @ $10/cy) 50,000on-site borrow for trash replacement

(5,000 cy <a $20/cy) 100,000sediment and erosion control 100,000passive gas vent system with carbon

cannister (50 ea. @$5,000 ea.) 250,000site regrading (15,000 cy @ $10/cy) 150,00012-inch clay layer (14,000 cy @ $30/cy) 420,00012-inch drainage layer (14,000 cy @ $25/cy) 350,000geotextile fabric (40,000 sy G> $7/sy) 280,00018-inch soil cover layer

(21,000 cy (a $20/cy) 420,0006-inch top soil layer (7,000 cy @ $30/cy) 210,000seed, mulch, fertilizer (40,000 sy @ $3/sy) 120,000surface erosion protection gravel

(500 cy <a $30/cy) 15,0008-feet security fence (3,000 LF & S25/LF) 75,000land acquisition for 50 feet buffer

(3 acres @ $5,000/acre) 15,000

Sub Total $ 2,712,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 271,000

Annual O&Msite review and cap repair 20,000mowing grass (10 times/year @ $2,000 ea.) 20,000gas vent system monitoring and repair • 5,000fence repair 5,000

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,983,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 50,000

17

AR30J360

Page 132: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

, . TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. II30/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-4

PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL CAP

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 2,983,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 50,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (30%) 895,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 746,000Contingency (25%) 746,000 13,000

Total Capital $ 5,370,000

Total Annual O&M $ 63,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 666.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 6,036,000

18

flR30J36i

Page 133: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-5

RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILL CAP

DIRECTITEM_______________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

RCRA Landfill CapDirect Capital

Mobilization/demobilization/decon pad 100,000site clearing (8 acres 9 $6,000/acre) 48,000tree removal (3 acres @ $3,000/acre) 9,000trash relocation (5,000 cy 9 $10/cy) 50,000on-site borrow for trash replacement

(5,000 cy 9 $20/cy) 100,000sediment and erosion control 100,000passive gas vent system with carbon

cannister (50 ea. @$5,000 ea.) 250,000site regrading (15,000 cy @ $10/cy) 150,00024-inch clay layer (28,000 cy @ $30/cy) 840,00012-inch drainage layer (14,000 cy 9 $25/cy) 350,000Two geotextile fabric layers

(80,000 sy 9 $7/sy) 560,000Geomembrane cap (40,000 sy 9 $10/sy) 400,00018-inch soil cover layer

(21,000 cy 9 $20/cy) 420,0006-inch top soil layer (7,000 cy 9 $30/cy) 210,000seed, mulch, fertilizer (40,000 sy 9 $3/sy) 120,000surface erosion protection gravel

(500 cy 9 $30/cy) 15,0008-feet security fence (3,000 LF 9 $25/LF) 75,000land acquisition for 50 feet buffer

(3 acres 9 $5,000/acre) 15,000

Sub Total $ 3,812,000

Direct Capital Contingency (10%) 381,000

Annual O&Msite review and cap repair 20,000mowing grass (10 times/year 9 $2,000 ea.) 20,000gas vent system monitoring and repair 5,000fence repair 5,000

Total 'Direct Capital Costs $ 4,193,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 50,000

19

38301362

Page 134: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

TCN 4204RI/FS REPORT

REV. #130/SEPT/91

BUTZ LANDFILL SITEALTERNATIVE LF-5

RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILL CAP

DIRECTITEM___________________________ CAPITAL ANNUAL O&M

Total Direct Capital Costs $ 4,193,000

Total Annual O&M Costs $ 50,000

Remedial Action & Remedial DesignConsulting Services (30%) 1,258,000

Legal & Administrative (25%) 1,048,000Contingency (25%) 1,048,000 13,000

Total Capital $ 7,547,000

Total Annual O&M $ 63,000

Present Worth of Annual O&M(8 % % for 30 years) $ 666.000

TOTAL PRESENT WORTH COST $ 8,213,000

20

3R30J363

Page 135: il74 NOTES: Pumped at average of 8.5 gpm for 41 minutes for total of 348.5 gals. Well was pumped dry. f WELL/SAMPLE DESIGNATION i R5 DEPTH TOTAL WELL TO WATER DEPTH DIAMETER TIME 1140

UNSCANNED ITEM(S)

ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MAY BE ASSOCIATEDWITH THIS DOCUMENT:

PHOTOGRAPHSDRAWINGS

OVERSIZED MAPSROLLED MAPS

PLEASE CONTACT THE CERCLA RECORDS CENTER TO VIEW THEITEM(S)