IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    1/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    9

    ADAPTIVE GAUSSIAN FILTER BASED IMAGE

    RECOVERY USING LOCAL SEGMENTATION

    SumeetWalia1, Sachin Majithia2

    1Department of Information Technology Chandigarh Engineering College, Landran Mohali, Punjab, India

    E-mail: [email protected] 

    2,Department of Information Technology Chandigarh Engineering College, Landran Mohali, Punjab, India

    E-mail: [email protected] 

    Abstract

    Image restoration is an important branch of Image processing, dealing with the reconstruction of Images by

    removing noise and blur from degraded Images and making them suitable for human perception. Any Image

    acquired by a device is susceptible of being degraded by the environment of acquisition and transmission.

    Removal of noises from the Images is a critical issue in the field of digital Image processing. So, we propose a

    new model of Image content restoration based on the Hybrid Regression which uses iterative block based

    model of genetic learning by using the fittest neighbor modeling of the Image frame data under observation

    using patch order kernel filtering with frame cross reference sing for dependent estimation of pattern to be

    restored and determine the intensity of the filter. The paper shows evaluation of the proposed method in

    comparison to previous approaches.

    Keywords : Restoration, DWT, filtering, histogram filter, degradation, HVS

    I. Introduction

    The restoration of image as well as data forms an imperative field which is related to the group

    of Image Handling. This field is basically meant to extract top notch of an image from an image

    of low quality. The low quality image may be uproarious or may contain some haziness. The

     processes which have been developed for the calculation of image handling are meant to

    overcome a number of issues such as the restoration of an image, the division of an image, the up

    gradation of an image etc. A process of information procurement is carried out for debasing the

    images. It has been seen that the advantages associated with the processes undergone for the

    enhancement of quality of image far exceed the implications related to the expenses or the

    unpredictable nature of the rebuilding calculations. The basic motivation behind the use of the

    Image restoration process is to make up for those imperfections which are debasing the image.

    The corruption present in the image can be in any form such as in the form of commotion or the

    misfocus of the camera. When the corruption is due to the movement of obscure, it is easy to

    think of some idea to gauge the first image by fixing the corrupted image [2].

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    2/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    10

    Another reason for the corruption of an image is due to commotion and the way in which such an

    image can be gauged is by making adjustments in the degradation which is caused because of

    commotion. In the present work, few systems that are included as a part of the field of Image

    handling for the process of restoring an image are discussed. In the present time, when digital

    cameras which have good focussing level and the other innovations in the field of digital media,there exists a number of cases where the image or video will still be debased because of

    corruption. For carrying out the reconstruction of such an image, image rebuilding can be

    considered as an emergency approach.

    The hypothesis clarifies that in a case in which the image is undermined; it becomes a key issue

    to make some sort of move in order to repair that image. The correspondence is thought of as a

    Fundamental intend for the restoration of an image in case of an emergency. With the help of

    correspondence, an element grants permission to the other elements so that they can comprehend

    an image and the impacts present in the image by utilising an arrangement of the experiences of

    the individuals who are prompting their transactions from the association or the company as in[4].

    A. Image Processing

    The process of image rebuilding was first adopted in 1950’s. Some of the areas in which image

    rebuilding finds application are: investigation of experiments [9], examinations related to law,

    film making. Another area of application of image rebuilding is the shopper photography as well

    as feature unravelling. However, the primary zone in which it is utilised is the recreation of

    images in radio space science or in radar imaging. The image rebuilding process [9] makes use

    of the earlier information related to the degradation. It also takes into account the corruption in

    the images and then the converse procedure is applied to them. It takes into consideration thegoodness of the image as the target criteria. The contortion is then demonstrated in the form of

    clamour or in the form of capacity of degradation. With the aim of restoration of an image from

    the commotion model, a variety of channels including the middle channel as well as homo

    morphic channel are employed. In order to get rid of the intermittent commotions, the various

    channels which are utilised are the middle channel, the Butterworth low pass channel or band

    reject channels. For the purpose of restoration of the image in case of a direct degradation, the

     processes of reverse as well as pseudo backwards shifting or the weiner separation are employed.

    B. Image Restoration

    It is concerned with the reconstruction and estimation of the uncorrupted image from blurred and

    noisy images. It tries to perform an operation on the image that is the inverse of the

    imperfections in the image formation system. In the use of image restoration methods, the

    characteristics of the degrading system and the noise are assumed to be known unknown. Image

    restoration algorithms distinguish themselves from image enhancement methods in that they are

     based on models for the degrading process and for the ideal images. For those cases where a

    fairly accurate blur model is available, powerful restoration algorithms can be arrived at.

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    3/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    11

    Unfortunately, in numerous practical cases of interest the modeling of the blur is unfeasible,

    rendering restoration impossible.

    Fig. 1: Processing of Image Restoration

    Figure 1 represents the Technique for processing of image restoration. Image Processing is the

     processing of Images and Videos using mathematical operations where input is an image, such as

     photograph or a Video Frame, output of Image Processing can be a Image or some set of

    characters. Most Image Processing techniques involve treating the Image as a two-dimensional

    signal and applying standard signal processing technique to it. The restoration systems use

    different sorts of channels for accomplishing best execution, similar to converse channel, wiener

    channel, obliged minimum square channel, Histogram Adaptive Fuzzy channel, Min-max

    Detector Based channel and Centre Weighted Mean channel and so for others [14].

    The limited validity of blur models is often a factor of disappointment, but one should realize

    that if none of the blur models are applicable, the corrupted image may well be beyond

    restoration. Therefore, no matter how powerful blur identification and restoration algorithms are,

    the objective when capturing an image undeniably is to avoid the need for restoring the image.

    Image restoration deals with images recorded in the presence of one or more sources of

    degradation. Many sources of degradation are present in imaging systems [12].Some types affect

    only the gray levels at the individual picture points without introducing spatial blur. They are

    called point degradation. Other types which do involve blur are spatial degradations. Blurring is

    a form of bandwidth reduction of an ideal image caused by imperfect image formation process.

    II. Literature Review

    In order to enhance the nature of the pixonal Images, [11] has proposed two augmentations for

    the images based on pixon. The first augmentation is achieved with the help of

     bicubicinterpolation and the next augmentation is based on expansions which are achieved by

    making use of the technique of fluffy shifting. With the aim of removal of noise from the pixonal

    Degraded Image

    Knowledge of

    Image Creation

    Develop InverseDe radation

    Apply Inverse

    De radation

    DevelopDegradatio

     

    Input Output

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    4/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    12

    image, there is the provision for connecting the differential mathematical functions on it. In an

    attempt to reduce the various noises and to restore the image, the systems of comparison

    employing fluffy separation and incomplete differential systems are consolidated. The results

    obtained depict that the proposed scheme is better than the current systems which are based on

    the PDE strategy or wavelet systems.

    In [21], the authors have suggested a model that can be used for carrying out mapping between

    the spaces by employing the coupled lexicon learning. The technique makes use of the references

    which have been learnt for the purpose of recuperating the patch in case of the patches having

    low determination. In the work proposed, two bearings have been utilised for the enhancement of

     productivity and in order to accelerate the calculations:

    1)  The LR Image patches are selectively transformed by considering the characteristic

    insights of an image.

    2) 

    Learning of a neural network that will result in quick representation derivation.

    The image patches can undergo processing adaptively by taking into account the standard

    deviation of threshold by making use of the neural networks. In [25], the authors have suggested

    a strategy for the preparation of coupled word reference for the case of super resolution of single

    image. With the help of some inadequate representations, the proposed strategy can relate the

     patches of low and high determination. The preparing power of the coupled lexicon which is

    achieved from the patch of LR can result in the reproduction of HR patch of the word reference.

    The calculation so performed leads to the enhancement of the exactness of recuperation. Apart

    from this, in this time the relics of the recuperation can also be uprooted.

    A Bayesian super determination calculation is proposed in this paper with characteristic Image

    measurements by utilizing generative plans for high determination Image rebuilding Image

    estimation through testing. It uses the characteristic Image measurements for Image SR with

    utilizing adaptable high request Markov Random Field model. Field-of-master model is utilized

    to take in the former model from normal Images. The creators have proposed a completely

    Bayesian approach, that partners a former learning on concealed high determination Image and

    in addition the noise level into the structure in regular ways in. High request MRF model is

    utilized for catching the high determination Image insights without utilizing priors and for

    displaying the normal Image measurements additionally empowers generative inspecting. The

    Bayesian least mean square mistake (MMSE) criterion is used to shape estimate of HR Image

    [25]. This MMSE method does not oblige impromptu change for accomplishing alluring

    rebuilding execution. MMSE criteria are less touchy for the nearby minima in the arrangement

    space than the MAP. Trial tests demonstrate that the proposed system can create preferable

    results over the cutting edge SR calculations. To begin with restoration the model was analysed

    for individual storm streak and snow. This model is then fit to a component and is used to

    recognize rain or snow streaks first in repeat space, and the area result is then traded to Image

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    5/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    13

    space. The shortcoming is that it is not material for light rain, ensuing to the sample moulded in

    repeat space is not specific.

    The Phase technique uses old techniques that are available in video outlines with noise.

    According to the phases of video chains distinctive sorts of curios are distinguished which may

    contain obscure delivered amid obtaining, post-preparing an interpreting. For rebuilding reason,

    every one of these sorts are connected on edge to watch the impacts of these sorts on casing.

    Division calculation is utilized which is in view of visual consideration model for recognizing

     piece of haziness on entire edge and the deliberate obscure of the foundation. Trial test

    demonstrates that it can illuminate diverse sorts of antiquities furthermore the correspondence

     between metric qualities and judgements of human perception. Viability of these measurements

    are tried chiefly against subjective judgements review of techniques for digital restoration of

    images. Some examples of restoration were included to illustrate the methods discussed in [31].

    A special phase transformation to extract linear features successfully from satellite images was

    made. Many motion-blurred image restoration methods were proposed recent years, and themethod adopted a multiphase spatial and spectral approach for restoration.

    In [32] this method the creators have proposed a non-neighbourhood portion relapse model for

    Image and video restoration. This model joins the non-nearby self-comparability and

    neighbourhood auxiliary normality properties for solid and vigorous estimation of normal

    Images. The proposed technique performs Image and videodeblurring, denoising and super-

    determination chip away at Images. Neighbourhood basic normality is utilized for watching the

     patches of Images that has customary structures where accurate judgment of pixel values through

    relapse is conceivable. The non-nearby self-closeness is primarily in light of the perception of

    Image fix that can rehash themselves in Images and videos. A similar approach based on Group-Based Sparse Representation (GSR) system was proposed. As opposed to utilizing fix as an open

    unit they misused the idea of gathering as an essential unit of inadequate representation which is

    a mix of nonlocal patches which has comparable structure. The proposed GSR displaying

    contains three folds [33]. The principal fold speak to the normal Images scantily in space of

    gathering which portrays the non-nearby self-similitude and characteristic neighborhood sparsity

    of Images all the while in a brought together structure. In second crease, instead of utilizing

    lexicon gaining from normal Images, a versatile gathering word reference learning system is

    composed with low intricacy.

    III. Problem Formulation

    In the review of various techniques, the problem of applying recovery to large set of images is

    the high computing time required for processing and the requirement for a large matrix data. In

    this research work, we propose a fast image recovery algorithm by dividing the image into block

    of pixels and applying to each block instead of the entire image. The previous approach had

     problems relating to the recovery of data with artifact generation, this occurred primarily due to

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    6/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    14

    the non-regularized filtering and global filtering. This resulted in a lower PSNR, due to the fact

    that the saturation of data with low MSE, was filtered resulting in disorientation of pixel data.

    IV. Proposed Work Methodology

    [1] 

    Select the image for recovery from database and pre process or dimensioning for analysis[2] Calculate Gaussian after calculation of Gaussian and deviation values, the kernel filter is

    designed using non local gradients according to Gaussian calculations.

    [3] Gaussian based deviation using TV estimation

    [4] The kernel filter derived from above system is convoluted with image and the intensity of the

    filter is set according to the change in the block based standard deviation.

    [5] Calculate Gaussian for the image at final stage

    [6] Filter the image using iterative kernel with average power ratio Based Segment Enhancement

    [7] On basis of avg power ratio segmentation should increase or decrease. Avg power ratio will

    change for particular block, where the proportion is constant that is maximum. Power ratio is

    segmented of each block. Then maximum limit is calculated.

    [8] Continue recovery till the power ratio is stable with low deviation for all the blocks under

    observation

    [9] Calculate parameter and analyze the results

    V. Quality Metrics Used

    A. Mean-squared error (MSE)

    Mean-squared error (MSE) has been the dominant quantitative performancemetric in the field of

    signal processing. It remains the standard criterion for the assessment of signal quality and

    fidelity; it is the method of choice for comparing competing signal processing methods

    andsystems, and, perhaps most importantly, it is the nearly ubiquitous preference of design

    engineers seeking to optimize signal processing algorithms.

    1 1

    2

    0 0

    ( , ) '( , )W H 

     x y

     f x y f x y

     MSE WH 

    …………………(5.1)

    B. Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR)

    Peak signal-to-noise proportion, frequently condensed PSNR, is a designing term for the

     proportion between the greatest conceivable force of a sign and the force of tainting commotion

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    7/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    15

    that influences the devotion of its representation. Since numerous signs have a wide element

    range, PSNR is typically communicated as far as the logarithmic decibel scale.

    10

    25520log PSNR

     MSE 

     ………………………………(5.2) 

    C. Block Diagram

    Fig. 2: shows the proposed system flow diagram

    VI. Results and Discussion

    The below section shows the comparison of the proposed method with that of the previous

    systems using visual output comparison and metric based evaluation of PSNR, MSE and Entropy

    values.

    Select the image

    Analyze for image quality and pres

     process

    Calculate Gaussian and performfiltering using TV based Kernel

    Avg. power ratio based segmentation

    enhancement

    Continue segment enhancement with kernel filtering till low

    deviation is achieved

    Get the total recovered image

    Get average

     power deviation

    Perform evaluation of the system in

    all environments

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    8/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    16

    Table 1: Tabular representation of PSNR Values at Different Gaussian Noise Level

    Guassian

    Noise Levels 

    Median

    Filter

    Avg. Filter Hist.

    Eq.Filter

    Weiner Filter Prop. Filter

    PSNR PSNR PSNR PSNR PSNR

    5 8.487671 8.517238 13.88805 10.57732 15.00604

    10 8.70839 7.59384 10.794 9.17899 13.38049

    15 7.654813 6.670538 9.972098 10.642486 12.676373

    20 6.956329 5.815018 9.066818 8.911423 11.896088

    25 6.242164 5.187538 8.017599 8.183708 11.147752

    Fig. 4: Graphical representation of PSNR Values at Different Gaussian Noise Levels

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    5 10 15 20 25

       P   S   N   R

       (   I  n   d   B   )

    Gaussian Noise Levels

    Median Filter

    Average Filter

    Hist. Eq. Filter

    Weiner Filter

    Prpposed Filter

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    9/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    17

    Table 2: Tabular representation of S.D Values at Different Gaussian Noise Levels

    GuassianNoise Levels 

    MedianFilter

    Avg. Filter Hist.

    Eq.Filter

    Weiner Filter Prop. Filter

    Std. Dev Std. Dev Std. Dev Std. Dev Std. Dev

    5 13.487671 13.517238  18.88805  15.57732 20.00604

    10 13.70839  12.59384  15.794  14.17899  18.38049 

    15 12.654813 11.670538  14.972098  15.642486  17.676373 

    20 11.95633 10.81502  14.06682  13.91142  16.89609 

    2511.24216 10.18754

     13.0176

     13.18371

     16.14775

     

    Fig. 6: Graphical representation of S.D Values at Different Gaussian Noise Levels

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    5 10 15 20 25

       S   t  a  n   d  a  r   d   D  e  v   i  a   t   i  o  n

    Gaussian Noise Levels

    Median Filter

    Average Filter

    Hist. Eq. Filter

    Weiner Filter

    Proposed Filter

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    10/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    18

    Table 3: Tabular representation of MSE Values at Different Gaussian Noise Levels

    Guassian

    Noise Levels Median Filter Avg. Filter Hist.

    Eq.Filter

    Weiner Filter Prop. Filter

    MSE MSE MSE MSE MSE

    5 16.037671 16.067238  21.43805  18.12732 22.55604

    10 16.25839  15.14384  18.344  16.72899  20.93049 

    15 15.204813 14.220538  17.522098  18.192486  20.226373 

    20 14.50633 13.36502  16.61682  16.46142  19.44609 

    25 13.79216 12.73754  15.5676  15.73371  18.69775 

    Fig. 8: Graphical representation of MSE Values at Different Gaussian Noise Levels

    VII. Conclusion and Future Scope

    Image restoration is an important branch of image processing, dealing with the reconstruction of

    images by removing noise and blur from degraded images and making them suitable for human

     perception. Any image acquired by a device is susceptible of being degraded by the environment

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    5 10 15 20 25

       M   S   E

    Gaussian Noise Levels

    Median Filter

    Average Filter

    Hist. Eq. Filter

    Weiner Filter

    Proposed Filter

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    11/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    19

    of acquisition and transmission. Therefore, a fundamental problem in the image processing is the

    improvement of their quality through the reduction of the noise that they can contain being often

    known as "cleaning of images". The goal of the restoration approach is to improve the given

    image so that it is suitable for further processing. Removal of noises from the images is a critical

    issue in the field of digital image processing. Various filters and techniques are used in imagerestoration to restore the corrupted image to its original form. The restoration results in the

    improved quality of image. The types of noises are explained and discussed along with their

     probability density functions (PDF).Various spatial filtering techniques are used for reducing

    these noises from images. The proposed system work to perfect the images and make them free

    from all the given disturbances, with truth evaluation using various quality metrics showing the

    high performance capacity of the proposed system above the previous surveyed systems.

    In future the proposed work can be implemented in real-time operating system using VLSI

    design in the microchip for onboard use in mobiles and portable laptop devices, the method can

    also be modified to use in devices with limited RAM space.

    REFERENCES

    [1]  Douglas, S.C.“Introduction to Adaptive Filters”, Digital Signal Processing Handbook  

    [2]  Jian Zhang, Debin Zhao, Wen Gao, (August 2014) ”  Group-Based Sparse Representation for Image

    Restoration”, IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Vol. 23, No. 8. 

    [3]  BiswaRanjanMohapatra, Ansuman Mishra, Sarat Kumar Rout, (March 2014 )“A Comprehensive Review onImage Restoration Techniques”, International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, No.3, E-

    ISSN: 2321-9637

    [4]  Baochen Jiang, Aiping Yang, Chengyou Wang and ZhengxinHou,(2014) “Comparison of Motion-blurred

    Image Restoration Using Wiener Filter and Spatial Difference Technique” International Journal of SignalProcessing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition Vol.7, No.2, pp.11-22

    http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsip.2014.7.2.02[5]  R. E. KALMAN,, (2009).“A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems”, International

    Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol 4, no. 6.

    [6]  Francesca Dardi ,LeonardoAbate , JeroenStessen , GiovanniRamponi , (2013) “ Causes and subjectiveevaluation of blurriness in video frames “, Elsevier Signal Processing: Image Communication 28 209 – 221.

    [7]  Haichao Zhang, Jianchao Yang, Yanning Zhang , Thomas S. Huang,(June 2013) “ Image and VideoRestorations via Nonlocal Kernel Regression”, IEEE Transactions On Cybernetics, Vol. 43, No. 3,

    [8]  Dr. A. Sri Krishna, G.SrinivasaRao and M. Sravya, (2013)“Contrast Enhancement Techniques Using

    Histogram Equalization Methods on Color Images with Poor Lightning”, Vol. 11, No. 7.

    [9]  SatyadhyanChickerur, Aswatha Kumar,(2009) November “A Biologically Inspired Filter For Image

    Restoration”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol 2, no. 2.[10]  R. Srivastava, H. Parthasarthy, J. R. P. Gupta, and D. R. Choudhary,, (2009) “Image restoration from motion

     blurred image using PDEs formalism”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Advance Computing

    Conference, Patiala, India, March 6-7, pp. 61-64.

    [11] 

    EhsanNadernejada, Mohsen Nikpour,(30 May 2012)” Image denoising using new pixon representation basedon fuzzy filtering and partial differential equations, “Elsevie, Digital Signal Processing 22 913 – 922.

    [12]  Pinton, Gianmarco F., Gregg E. Trahey, and Jeremy J. Dahl.6 (2011) "Sources of image degradation in

    fundamental and harmonic ultrasound imaging: a nonlinear, full-wave, simulation study." IEEE transactionson ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control 58:1272.

    [13]  Cai, Jian-Feng, et al. (2012)"Image restoration: Total variation, wavelet frames, and beyond."  Journal of the

    American Mathematical Society 25.4: 1033-1089.

    [14]  Varghese, Jobin, et al.(2014) "Efficient adaptive fuzzy-based switching weighted average filter for the

    restoration of impulse corrupted digital images." Image Processing, IET 8.4: 199-206.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsip.2014.7.2.02http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsip.2014.7.2.02

  • 8/17/2019 IJTC201601002-Adaptive Gaussian Filter Based Image Recovery Using Local Segmentation

    12/12

      INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTING (IJTC) ISSN-2455-099X,

    Volume 2, Issue 1  January 2016. 

    20

    [15]  Esakkirajan, S., et al.(2011) "Removal of high density salt and pepper noise through modified decision based

    unsymmetric trimmed median filter." Signal Processing Letters, IEEE 18.5: 287-290.

    [16]  Khare, Charu, and Kapil Kumar Nagwanshi.(June 2011) "Implementation and analysis of image restoration

    techniques." International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology-May to (2011).

    [17]  Shukla, Awanish Kumar, et al. "An improved directional weighted median filter for restoration of images

    corrupted with high density impulse noise(2014) "Optimization, Reliabilty, and Information Technology

    (ICROIT), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE.[18]  W. Quan and W. N. Zhang, (2011) “Restoration of motion- blurred star image based on Wiener filter”,

    Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation,

    Shenzhen, China, March 28-29, pp. 691-694.[19]  X. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Qi, W.K. Leow and T.K. Ng, , (2006)"Rain Removal in Video by Combining Temporal

    and Chromatic Properties," in IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo, pp. 461-464.

    [20]  BalvantSingh , Ravi Shankar Mishra, PuranGour (2009)Analysis of Contrast Enhancement Techniques ForUnderwater Image, vol. 1, pp. 328-335.

    [21]  Jianchao Yang, Zhaowen Wang, Zhe Lin, Scott Cohen, Thomas Huang, “Coupled Dictionary Training for

    Image Super-Resolution”, IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Vol. 21, No. 8, August 2012. 

    [22]  KshitizGarg and Shree K. Nayar, “Vision and Rain”, International Journal of Computer Vision 75(1), 3– 27,

    February 2007[23]  Reddy, P. HarshaVardhan, B. Karthik, and TVU Kiran Kumar. "Restoration of Image Using DCT and

    Modified Decision Based Unsymmetrical Trimmed Median Filter." 

    International Journal of Research 

    2.4(2015): 846-849.

    [24]  Rainer Poisel and Simon Tjoa,”A Comprehensive Literature Review of File Carving”, 2013 International

    Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.[25]  Haichao Zhang, Yanning Zhang , Haisen Li, Thomas S. Huang,” Generative Bayesian Image Super

    Resolution with natural image prior ”, IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Vol. 21, No. 9, September

    2012.[26]  Taeg Sang Cho, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Neel Joshi, Sing Bing Kang, Richard Szeliski, and William T. Freeman

    ,” Image Restoration by Matching Gradient Distributions”, IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis And

    Machine Intelligence, Vol. 34, No. 4, April 2012.

    [27]  Ming Zhou, Zhichao Zhu, Rong, Deng, ShuaiFang,Rain, “Detection and Removal of Sequential Images”,

    IEEE Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 615-618, 2011.[28]  Peter C. Barnum ,SrinivasaNarasimhan ,Takeo Kanade “Analysis of Rain and Snow in Frequency Space”,

    Springer International Journal of Computer Vision 86,256-274, 2010.[29] 

    R. E. KALMAN, “A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems”, International Journal of

    Recent Trends in Engineering, vol 4, no. 6, (2009).[30]  K. Garg and S.K. Nayar, "Detection and removal of rain from videos," in IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and

    Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 528-535, 2004.

    [31]  K. Jain, "Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing", Engelwood Cliff, N. J.: Print ice Hall, (2006).

    [32]  Guillemot, Christine, and Olivier Le Meur. "Image inpainting: Overview and recent advances."  Signal

    Processing Magazine, IEEE 31.1 (2014): 127-144.

    [33]   NasirMemon and Anandabrata Pal” Automated Reassembly of File Fragmented Images Using GreedyAlgorithms”, IEEE Transactions of image processing, VOL. 15, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2006. 

    [34]  H. Taub, D.L. Schilling,(1991) "Principles of Communication Systems", TMH.

    [35]  Piotr S. Windyaga,(2001) January) "Fast Implusive Noise Removal", IEEE Trans. On Image Processing,

    vol.1 0, no, 1.