IJEST10-02-11-037

  • Upload
    haydar

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    1/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF

    INCONEL 718 DURING DIE-SINKING

    ELECTRIC DISCHARGE MACHININGPUSHPENDRA S BHARTI*

    Research Scholar, University School of Engineering and Technology,

    Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi-110006, India

    S. MAHESHWARIManufacturing Process and Automation Engineering Division,

    Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Delhi, India

    C. SHARMADepartment of Mechanical and Automation Engineering,

    Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Delhi-110006, India

    Abstract:

    This work investigates the machining characteristics of Inconel 718 during die-sinking electric discharge machining

    process with copper as tool electrode. Experiments have been carried out to see the effects of input parameters like

    shape factor, pulse-on-time, discharge current, duty cycle, gap voltage, flushing pressure and tool electrode lift time

    on performance measures like material removal rate, surface roughness and tool wear rate. Taguchis method has

    been used as Design of Experiments technique for experimental investigation. Experiments have been designed asper Taguchis L36 orthogonal array. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is employed to indicate the level of

    significance of machining parameters. Discharge current and pulse-on time are found the most influential common

    input parameter on each performance measure. Duty cycle and tool electrode lift time are found the least influentialparameters.

    Keywords: Electric-discharge machining(EDM); Material removal rate(MRR); Surface roughness (SR);Tool wear rate (TWR); Taguchis Method; Design of experiments (DOE); Inconel 718.

    1. Introduction

    Nickel based super alloy are extremely useful in gas turbine, space vehicles, aircraft, nuclear reactors, submarine,petrochemical equipments and other high temperature applications. Inconel 718, a nickel based super alloy, is a

    precipitation-hardenable nickel-chromium alloy containing significant amounts of iron, niobium, and molybdenum

    along with lesser amounts of aluminum and titanium. It combines corrosion resistance and high strength with

    outstanding weldability, including resistance to post weld cracking. The alloy has excellent creep-rupture strength at

    temperatures up to 700 C (1300 F). Owing to its excellent mechanical and metallurgical properties this alloy finds

    extensive use in gas turbines, rocket motors, spacecraft, nuclear reactors, pumps and tooling. Its outstanding hightemperature strength and toughness create difficulties during machining due to its work hardening tendency. Inonel

    718 is one of the most difficult-to-machine super alloys in order to satisfy production and quality requirement. Thisdifficulty in machining is attributed to its ability to maintain hardness at elevated temperature which otherwise isvery useful for hot working environment. Formation of complex shapes by this material along with reasonable speed

    and surface finish is not possible in traditional machining. Therefore, EDM is one of the most suitable processes to

    shape this alloy. This alloy has attracted many researchers because of its increasing applicability in high temperature

    conditions. Still, the available research data pertaining to EDM of Inconel 718 is not sufficient. The authors during

    the literature survey did not come across any work that investigates the machining characteristics of Inconel 718during die-sinking EDM. Therefore its machining behavior and its response to change in input parameters of the

    process needs to be evaluated. Hence, attempts have been made to investigate the machining characteristics of

    Inconel 718 during die-sinking EDMprocess.

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6464

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    2/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    EDM is one of the most extensively used non-conventional material removal processes. EDM is a thermo-

    electric process in which material is removed from work piece by erosion effect of series of electric discharges

    (sparks) between tool and work piece immersed in a dielectric liquid. The electric energy induced by electric sparks

    converts into thermal energy resulting in high temperature which melts and evaporates the work piece and tool

    electrode. The eroded particles are flushed away by dielectric liquid. Physical and metallurgical properties do notcreate any limitation for the materials to be machined on EDM as there is no physical contact between tool and work

    piece.

    This work investigates the influence of input parameters on performance measures during die-sinking EDMof Inconel 718 with copper as tool electrode. There are many input parameters of electric discharge machine that

    could be taken for experimental investigation of Inconel 718. Exploratory experiments were conducted to select the

    input parameters and their levels. In this work, Shape factor (SF), Pulse-on-time (Ton), Discharge current (Id), Duty

    cycle (), Flushing pressure (P) and Tool electrode lift time (TL) have been taken as input parameters. Material

    removal rate (MRR), Surface Roughness (SR) and Tool Wear Rate (TWR) have been taken as performance

    measures. The level of influence of input parameters has also been identified after experimental investigation.

    Experimental investigation requires a number of experimental runs that may be an expensive and time

    consuming affair. Design of experiments techniques like Taguchis method, Response surface methodology etc. areused to reduce the experimental runs in a scientific manner. DOE, a statistical technique, is used to study the effects

    of various input parameters on performance measures simultaneously. In this work, experiments have been designed

    as per Taguchis L36 (21 36) orthogonal array. Seven input parameters are taken, out of which one has 2 levels andthe rest six have 3 levels each. Orthogonal array allows to assess the effect of each factor independently of the

    effects of other factors. Many authors have applied DOE technique to explain the machining characteristics ofdifferent materials during electric discharge machining. George et al. [1] employed Taguchis method to explain the

    machining characteristics of carbon-carbon deposits during electric discharge machining. Liu et al. [2] employed L9

    orthogonal array to see the effect of various input parameters on MRR. Ramasawmy and Bunt [3] did quantativeassessment of process parameters of EDM by Taguchis method by taking M300 (tool steel) as the work piece.

    Ramasawmy and Bunt [4] presented experimental work that was done in order to quantify the effect of some of

    EDM main parameters on surface texture. This work was then verified was Taguchis method. Ramakrishnan and

    Krishnamurthy [5] reported the effect of pulse-on-time and delay time on MRR and SR during wire EDM of Inconel718. But they did not discuss the effect of other parameters on performance measures. They reported that higher

    pulse-on-time gives more MRR but poor surface finish. Puri and Bhattacharya [6 ] analyzed the effect of 13 process

    parameters on MRR, SR and accuracy of WEDM. There are many references in which Taguchis method has been

    used as DOE technique to explain the machining characteristics of different material on EDM [7] [8] [9].However, some authors have employed other techniques also [10] to see the influence of process

    parameters on performance measures, DOE technique is found very simple and efficient. The authors during theliterature survey did not come across any work that uses DOE technique to investigate the machining characteristics

    of Inconel 718 during die-sinking electric discharge machining. Hence, attempts have been made to investigate thedie sinking EDM characteristics of Inconel 718 by DOE techniques in this work.

    2. Experiments

    Material employed in this study is Inconel 718. The mechanical properties of Inconel 718 are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Mechanical properties of Inconel 718

    Property Unit Value

    Density g/cm3 8.19

    Melting Point/range C 1260-

    1336Ultimate tensile strength MPa 1240

    Yield Strength MPa 1036

    Hardness HRC 36

    Average Coefficient of Thermal

    Expansion

    m/m K 13

    Thermal Conductivity W/m K 11.4

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6465

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    3/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Inconel 718 has been chosen for the investigation because of its increasing demand in high temperature applications

    and lack of literature available on eclectic discharge machining of this material.

    Experiments have been carried out on Elecktra Plus S-50 ZNC oil die-sinking electric discharge machine in

    which the Z-axis is servo controlled and X and Y axis are manually controlled.

    Based on literature survey and preliminary investigations, the parameters chosen as inputs are shape factor,pulse-on-time, discharge current, duty cycle, gap voltage , flushing pressure, tool electrode lift time. The working

    range of input parameters and the levels taken are shown in Table 2. Preliminary experiments were conducted in the

    given range of different input parameters to select their levels. For accurate characterization of the process,experiments must be designed properly. L36 (2

    136) orthogonal array, shown in Table 3, has been used which

    contains 36 experimental runs at various combinations of seven input variables.

    Table 2. Machining parameters and their levels

    Input parameters Unit Symbol Range

    (as specified bymachine

    manufacturer)

    Levels and values

    1 2 3

    Shape factor (SF) - A - Square Circular -

    Pulse-on-time (Ton) s B 0.25-4000 50 100 150

    Discharge current (Id) A C 0.5-50 3 8 12

    Duty cycle () % D 0-1 0.7 0.75 0.83Gap voltage (Vg) V E 1-150 50 70 90

    Flushing pressure (P) kg/cm2

    F 0-1 0.3 0.5 0.7

    Tool electrode lift time(TL)

    sec G 1-12 1 2 3

    Since stable machining conditions are achieved after 10 minutes, a study of 15 minutes machining or 0.5 mm depth

    of cut (whichever is earlier) is taken in this work.

    MRR, TWR and SR have been used to evaluate machining performance. MRR and TWR (mm3/min) are

    calculated by measuring the amount of material removed and the machining time by using following equation

    (min)timemachining)3(g/mmelectrodeorpieceworkofdensity

    (g)electrodeorpieceworkofin weightReduction

    /min)

    3

    (mmTWRorMRR

    Initial and final weights of work piece and electrode were measured by electronic weighing balance having a

    resolution of 0.001 g. Surface roughness was measured by a contact type stylus based surface tester. The centre line

    average (CLA) surface roughness parameter Ra war used to quantify the surface roughness.

    Copper electrodes of cross sections: square and circle were used to conduct the experiment. The area of both square

    and circular shaped electrodes was kept same to avoid any ambiguity in machining.

    3. Analysis method

    3.1 Taguchis method

    Taguchis method is a well accepted methodology for experiment design. In this, signal-to-noise ratio(S/N) is usedto represent a response or quality characteristics and the largest S/N ratio is required. There are three types of quality

    characteristics viz. nominal-the-better, larger-the-better and smaller-the-better. In this work, experimentally

    observed MRR value is larger-the-better and TWR and SR are lower-the-better. Based on Taguchis method,S/N ratio calculation is done as below-

    i) Larger-the-better

    n

    iiy

    nNS

    1 2

    11log10/ [1]

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6466

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    4/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    ii) Smaller-the-better

    n

    iiy

    nNS

    1

    21log10/ [2]

    Where iy is the experimentally observed value and n is the repeated number of each experiment.

    Table 3. Design experiment of L 36(2

    1

    3

    6

    ) array with different experimental parametric levelsExpNo.

    SF

    Ton

    (s)Id

    (A)

    (%)Vg(V)

    P(kg/ cm2)

    TL(sec)

    SRTWR

    S/N

    (MRRS/N(SR)

    S/N

    (TWR

    1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14

    4.25 0.0300 13.0984 -12.5678 30.4684

    2 1 2 2 2 2 2 22

    7.3 0.6995 28.0212 -17.2665 3.1041

    3 1 3 3 3 3 3 33

    9.46 0.9407 31.2768 -19.5178 0.5311

    4 1 1 1 1 1 2 24

    6.145 0.1114 13.5607 -15.7704 19.0619

    5 1 2 2 2 2 3 33

    7.9 0.9235 29.7169 -17.9525 0.6912

    6 1 3 3 3 3 1 14

    8.55 0.3780 33.8087 -18.6393 8.4509

    7 1 1 1 2 3 1 22

    5.05 0.0741 8.6729 -14.0658 22.6018

    8 1 2 2 3 1 2 32

    9 0.3960 29.5153 -19.0849 8.0465

    9 1 3 3 1 2 3 13

    11.07 0.3010 30.9475 -20.883 10.4297

    10 1 1 1 3 2 1 31

    5.36 0.0150 5.6339 -14.5833 36.4890

    11 1 2 2 1 3 2 11

    7.03 0.1029 21.0218 -16.9391 19.7523

    12 1 3 3 2 1 3 23

    10.73 0.1598 30.7536 -20.612 15.9310

    13 1 1 2 3 1 3 22

    8.05 0.3109 28.9105 -18.1159 10.1483

    14 1 2 3 1 2 1 35

    9.8 0.2391 34.8871 -19.8245 12.4298

    15 1 3 1 2 3 2 1

    2

    4.92 0.0075 8.7134 -13.8393 42.5096

    16 1 1 2 3 2 1 11

    7.16 0.1624 24.7165 -17.0983 15.7857

    17 1 2 3 1 3 2 23

    9.63 0.5226 29.7869 -19.6725 5.6366

    18 1 3 1 2 1 3 37

    5.2 0.0479 17.4441 -14.3201 26.3999

    19 2 1 2 1 3 3 31

    6.33 0.2283 24.6541 -16.0281 12.8310

    20 2 2 3 2 1 1 14

    10 0.5958 33.5252 -20 4.4973

    21 2 3 1 3 2 2 24

    4.29 0.0215 13.8749 -12.6491 33.3329

    22 2 1 2 2 3 3 11

    5.76 0.1750 21.6117 -15.2084 15.1385

    23 2 2 3 3 1 1 2

    4

    7.25 0.3855 32.4808 -17.2068 8.2784

    24 2 3 1 1 2 2 34

    4.67 0.0156 12.7863 -13.3863 36.1345

    25 2 1 3 2 1 2 33

    7.09 0.7231 31.9521 -17.0129 2.8160

    26 2 2 1 3 2 3 14

    6.11 0.0599 12.0518 -15.7208 24.4478

    27 2 3 2 1 3 1 21

    8.31 0.0202 23.2525 -18.392 33.8737

    28 2 1 3 2 2 2 11

    6.88 0.2196 24.4669 -16.7518 13.1675

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6467

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    5/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    4.

    Analysis of experimental results

    4.1 Material Removal Rate

    Table 3 shows the orthogonal array based experimental results of MRR and its corresponding S/N ratio, whoseANOVA results are shown in Table 4. Observation of Table 6 indicates that discharge current is the most

    dominant factor having percentage contribution as 89.07, followed by gap voltage and pulse-on-time. Fig. 1shows that MRR increases with the increase in discharge current. This is because at higher discharge current,

    more spark energy is induced which causes larger overcuts and thus produces larger chips. Fig. 2 shows that

    MRR increases as the value of pulse-on-time increases. Higher pulse-on-time i.e. duration time of EDM sparks

    indicates that spark energy is induced for a longer time which results in larger craters on work piece indicatinghigh MRR. But at a certain value of pulse-on-time, MRR is almost maximum and further increment in pulse-on-

    time does not affect MRR considerably. Fig. 3 shows the graph between MRR and gap voltage which indicates

    that initially MRR increases with increase in gap voltage but after certain point MRR decreases with furtherincrease in gap voltage. Further increment in gap voltage increases the discharge gap distance which in effect

    reduces the effect of induced energy at work piece and hence MRR decreases. Shape factor, duty cycle, flushing

    pressure and tool electrode lift time do not have considerable effect on MRR.

    Fig.1 Relationship between MRR and discharge current

    29 2 2 1 3 3 3 23

    5.82 0.0300 10.5735 -15.2985 30.4684

    30 2 3 2 1 1 1 33

    7.28 0.0874 30.0572 -17.2426 21.1659

    31 2 1 3 3 3 2 33

    6.9 0.2781 30.8659 -16.777 11.1154

    32 2 2 1 1 1 3 14

    4.49 0.0653 13.9080 -13.0449 23.6984

    33 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 7.03 0.0694 27.0865 -16.9391 23.1781

    34 2 1 3 1 2 3 23

    7.19 0.4013 31.7398 -17.1346 7.9310

    35 2 2 1 2 3 1 32

    6.03 0.0150 8.3155 -15.6063 36.4890

    36 2 3 2 3 1 2 12

    7.32 0.3037 28.1843 -17.2902 10.3518

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6468

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    6/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Fig. 2 Relationship between MRR and pulse-on-time

    Fig. 3 Relationship between MRR and gap voltage

    4.2 Surface Roughness

    Orthogonal array based experimental results of SR and their corresponding S/N ratios are represented in Table

    3. ANOVA results for SR, reported in Table 5, show that discharge current is the most dominant factor havingpercentage contribution as 68.42, followed by pulse-on-time and shape factor. Fig. 4 and 5 shows that SR

    increases when discharge current and pulse-on-time increase. The electric-discharge machined surface consists

    of a multitude of overlapping craters that are formed by spark discharges. The size of these craters depends onthe discharge energy and duration. More is the discharge energy (i.e. discharge current) and duration (pulse-on-

    time), the larger are the craters resulting in more surface roughness. It is also observed from Fig. 6 that circular

    tool electrode gives better surface finish than the square one. Duty cycle, gap voltage, flushing pressure and tool

    electrode lift time do not have considerable effect on SR.

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6469

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    7/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Fig. 4 Relationship between SR and discharge current

    Fig. 5 Relationship between SR and pulse-on-time

    Table 4. ANOVA results for MRR

    Source

    Degrees of

    freedom

    Sum of

    squares

    Mean

    square F-ratio

    Percentage

    contribution

    Shape factor (A) 1 2.3 2.3 0.3970 0.0805

    Pulse-on-time(B) 2 238.8017 119.40 20.6121 8.3538

    Dischargecurrent(C) 2 2151.7568 1075.87 185.7285 75.2731

    Duty cycle(D) 2 6.3 3.15 0.54378 0.2204

    Gap voltage(E) 2 308.0027 154 26.5851 10.7746

    Flushing

    pressure(F) 2 5.3 2.65 0.4574 0.1854

    Time interval(G) 2 18.7 9.35 1.61409 0.6542Error 22 127.44 5.7927 1 4.4581

    Total 2858.6 100

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6470

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    8/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Fig. 6 Relationship between SR and shape factor

    Table 5. ANOVA results for SR

    Source

    Degrees of

    freedom

    Sum of

    squares

    Mean

    square F-ratio

    Percentage

    contribution

    Shape factor (A) 1 10.09 10.09 7.7344 5.6492

    Pulse-on-time(B) 2 12.4 6.2 4.7526 6.9425Discharge

    current(C) 2 123.52 61.76 47.3421 69.1563

    Duty cycle(D) 2 0.12 0.06 0.0459 0.0672

    Gap voltage(E) 2 0.13 0.065 0.0498 0.0728

    Flushing

    pressure(F) 2 2.51 1.255 0.9620 1.4053

    Time interval(G) 2 1.14 0.57 0.4369 0.6383

    Error 22 28.7 1.304545 16.0685

    Total 178.61 100

    4.3 Tool Wear Rate

    Orthogonal array based experimental results of TWR and their corresponding S/N ratios are represented in

    Table 3. ANOVA results for TWR are reported in Table 6. ANOVA results show that discharge current is themost dominant factor having percentage contribution as 63.24, followed by pulse-on-time, flushing pressure and

    gap voltage. Fig. 7 shows that TWR increases as discharge current increases. High discharge current induces

    high spark energy which facilitates more material removal from work piece and tool electrode. TWR increasesinitially with increment in pulse-on-time but decreases with further increase in pulse-on-time as shown in Fig. 8.

    This is because of deposition of carbon particles on tool electrode at a high temperature. While calculating the

    weight loss of tool, actual loss is compensated, up to some extent, by carbon deposits. As a result tool wear rate

    decreases with further increase in pulse-on-time. Fig. 9 depicts that TWR increases when flushing pressure

    increases. High flushing pressure removes the eroded particles from the gap between tool and the work piece

    more effectively and efficiently which in effect increases the tool wear rate. High gap voltage induces higherspark energy which leads to more TWR. Shape factor, duty cycle, flushing pressure and tool electrode lift time

    do not have considerable effect on TWR.

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6471

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    9/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Fig. 7 Relationship between TWR and discharge current

    Fig. 8 Relationshipbetween TWR and pulse-on-time

    Fig. 9 Relationship between TWR and flushing pressure

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6472

  • 7/30/2019 IJEST10-02-11-037

    10/10

    Pushpendra.S.Bharti. et. al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

    Vol. 2(11), 2010, 6464-6473

    Table 6. ANOVA results for TWR

    Source

    Degrees of

    freedom

    Sum of

    squares

    Mean

    square F-ratio

    Percentage

    contribution

    Shape factor (A) 1 101 101 2.7237 2.1412

    Pulse-on-time(B) 2 327 163.5 4.4091 6.9324

    Discharge

    current(C) 2 3020.2 1510.1 40.7234 64.0280

    Duty cycle(D) 2 58 29 0.7820 1.2296

    Gap voltage(E) 2 145 72.5 1.9551 3.0740

    Flushingpressure(F) 2 242 121 3.2630 5.1304

    Time interval(G) 2 8 4 0.1078 0.1696

    Error 22 815.8 37.0818 17.2949

    Total 35 4717 100

    7. Conclusions

    The present work explains the machining characteristics of die-sinking EDM on Inconel 718. Taguchis methodhas been employed as a design of experiments technique successfully for establishing the relationship between

    various input parameters and performance measures. MRR increases with the increase in discharge current and

    pulse-on-time. MRR increases initially, attains a maximum value and further decreases with increase in gap

    voltage. SR increases with the increase in discharge current and pulse-on-time. TWR increases with the increasein discharge current and flushing pressure. TWR increases initially with the increase in pulse-on-time but after

    certain value it decreases. ANOVA has been applied to find the level of influence of input parameters on

    performance measures. Discharge current is found the most influential input parameter on each performance

    measure. Higher discharge current increases MRR, deteriorates surface finish and leads for more tool electrodeloss. Discharge current and pulse-on-time are identified as common influencing parameters for MRR, SR and

    TWR.

    References

    [1] George, P.M.; Raghunath, B.K.; Manochac, L.M.; Warrier, Ashish M.(2004): EDM machining of carbon-carbon composite-a Taguchi

    approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 145, pp. 66-71.

    [2] Liu, J.W.; Yue, T.M.; Guo, Z.N. (2009): Wire elcrtochemical discharge machining of Al2O3 particle reinforced Aluminium Alloy6061, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 14, pp. 446-453.

    [3] Ramasawmy, H; Blunt, L. (2002): 3D surface characterization of electro polished EDMed surface and quantitative assessment of

    process variables using Taguchi Methodology, The International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42, pp. 1129-1133.

    [4] Ramasawmy, H; Blunt, L.(2004): Effect of EDM process parameters on 3D surface topography, Journal of Material ProcessingTechnology, 148, pp. 115-164.

    [5] Ramakrishnan, R; Karunamoorthy, L. (2008): Modeling and multi-response optimization of Inconel 718 on machining of CNC

    WEDM process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 207, pp. 343-349.

    [6] Puri, A.B.; Bhattacharya, B. (2003): An analysis and optimization of the geometrical inaccuracy due to wire lag phenomenon in

    WEDM, International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacture, 43, pp. 151-159.[7] Huang, J.Y. (2003): Determination of finish-cutting operation number and machining-parameters setting in wire electrical discharge

    machining, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 87, pp. 69-81.

    [8] Tzeng, Yih-fong; Chen, Fu-chen. (2003): A simple approach for robust design of high-speed electrical-discharge machining

    technology, The International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, pp. 217-227.

    [9] Lin, Yan-Cherng; Cheng, Chao-Hsu; Su, Bo-Lin; Hwang, Lih-Ren (2006): Machining Characteristics and Optimization of MachiningParameters of SKH 57 High- Speed Steel Using Electrical-Discharge Machining Based on Taguchi Method, Materials and ManufacturingProcesses, 21, pp. 922-929.

    [10] Pellicer, N.; Ciurana, J; Ozel, T. (2009): Influence of process parameters and electrode geometry on feature micreo-accuracy inelectro-discharge machining of tool steel, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 24, pp. 1282-1289.

    ISSN: 0975-5462 6473