IINDIANDIANNDIANNDIAN N TRAILS G PUBLUBLICIC …discover.pbcgov.org/pzb/PDF/IndianTrailsGrove/ITG Info... · 2011-10-15 · Please hold questions until the end of the presentatPlease

1

Palm Beach CountyPalm Beach County

Seminole Ridge High School – November 10, 2015

IINDIANNDIAN TTRAILSRAILS GGROVEROVEPPUBLICUBLIC IINFORMATIONNFORMATION MMEETINGEETING

IINDIANNDIAN TTRAILSRAILS GGROVEROVEPPUBLICUBLIC IINFORMATIONNFORMATION MMEETINGEETING

Bryan Davis

Planning Division


AgendaAgendaAgendaAgenda• Introduction & Purpose

• Comprehensive Planning

• Project Location, History & Planning Efforts

• Amendment Overview

• Development Review Process

• Zoning Application and ULDC Changes

• Transportation Issues

• Questions & AnswersPlease hold questions until the end of the presentation.Please hold questions until the end of the presentation.Please hold questions until the end of the presentation.Please hold questions until the end of the presentation.

2


Purpose of this MeetingPurpose of this MeetingPurpose of this MeetingPurpose of this Meeting

• Convey Information about Processes– Planning

– Zoning

– Engineering/Transportation

• Convey Information about the Project– Applicant’s request

• Answer your questions related to the above


Bryan Davis, Principal Planner

CCOMPREHENSIVEOMPREHENSIVE PPLANNINGLANNING & & AAMENDMENTMENDMENT OOVERVIEWVERVIEW

CCOMPREHENSIVEOMPREHENSIVE PPLANNINGLANNING & & AAMENDMENTMENDMENT OOVERVIEWVERVIEW

3


Florida Comprehensive PlansFlorida Comprehensive PlansFlorida Comprehensive PlansFlorida Comprehensive Plans• Local governments required to adopt Plans

• Vision of the County

• Series of Elements – Land Use

– Transportation

– Housing

– Infrastructure

– Conservation

• Goals, Obj., Policies

• Adopted by Ordinance


Future Land Use AtlasFuture Land Use AtlasFuture Land Use AtlasFuture Land Use Atlas• Future Land Use (FLU) designation by parcel

– Unincorporated County

• FLU designations– Rural Residential

– Low Residential

– Medium Residential

– Commercial

– Industrial

– Institutional

– Conservation, etc.

4


Amendment ProcessAmendment ProcessAmendment ProcessAmendment Process

• Future Land Use Designation Change Requests– Proposed by land owners or County

– Four per year (typically)

• Amendment Review– Consistency with Comprehensive Plan (all relevant policies)

– Compatibility

– Service Delivery Impacts

– Local Plans and Overlays

– Comply with Florida Statutes relating to Community Planning


Amendment ProcessAmendment ProcessAmendment ProcessAmendment Process

• Public Notice– Community Groups

– Interested Parties

– Municipalities

– Special Districts

– Property Owners within 1,000 feet

– Properties posted with Signs within 6 weeks of intake

• Staff Report prepared– Recommendation of Approval, Approval w/Conditions, or

Denial

5


Amendment Public HearingsAmendment Public HearingsAmendment Public HearingsAmendment Public Hearings

• Planning Commission/Local Planning Agency– Advisory Board – makes recommendation

– Vista Center, 2300 N. Jog Road, West Palm Beach

• Board of County Commissioners Transmittal – Elected officials

– Governmental Center, 301 N. Olive Ave, West Palm Beach

• Board of County Commissioners Adoption– Same as Transmittal

– Final Action: Adopt by ordinance or deny


SSITEITE LLOCATIONOCATIONSSITEITE LLOCATIONOCATION

6


Where is Indian Trails Grove?Where is Indian Trails Grove?Where is Indian Trails Grove?Where is Indian Trails Grove?


Parcel History Parcel History Parcel History Parcel History

• Pine Flatwoods habitat

• L-8 Canal constructed pre-1953

• Truck farming and informal road/trail system

• M-Canal completed 1960s

• Drainage Improvements and Citrus Groves pre-’68

• 1993: Cypress Grove CDD established

• ‘00s: Citrus grove operation ceases

• ‘10s: Transition to row crops

7



USDA AerialUSDA Aerial1940 CJF 12 741940 CJF 12 74

USDA AerialUSDA Aerial1940 CJF 12 741940 CJF 12 74



USDA 1953USDA 1953Aerial CompositeAerial Composite


8






PPLANNINGLANNING HHISTORYISTORY OFOF AAREAREAPPLANNINGLANNING HHISTORYISTORY OFOF AAREAREA

9


Relevant Planning Efforts for AreaRelevant Planning Efforts for AreaRelevant Planning Efforts for AreaRelevant Planning Efforts for Area

• Midlands Study (1986-89)– Future needs of area; focus on health/safety & limiting factors

• Concurrency Exemption for Acreage

• Transportation Planning– Theme: Increase connections through the area to accommodate

existing and anticipated growth

• Acreage Neighborhood Plan (1995)– Focus on character

– Indian Trail Groves not included within Neighborhood Plan


Transportation PlanningTransportation PlanningTransportation PlanningTransportation Planning• 1991 Study

• Depicts RoadNetwork of 2015

• Included in Acreage

Neighborhood

Plan’s Tech. Appendix & Informational Elements

10


Area Planning (continued)Area Planning (continued)Area Planning (continued)Area Planning (continued)• Managed Growth Tier System (1996)

– Linked Service Areas to area character

• Central Western Communities Sector Plan (’99-’07)– Attempt to address impacts of growth associated with the established

development pattern and plan for region’s future

– Addressed large undeveloped parcels

• 2015 Legislative Session– SB 1244 “Constrained Ag. Parcels”


What is a “Sector Plan?”What is a “Sector Plan?”What is a “Sector Plan?”What is a “Sector Plan?”

•• Optional State Planning ProcessOptional State Planning Process

•• LongLong--term, large area planning to:term, large area planning to:

– foster innovative development strategies

– protect regionally significant resources and facilities

– address regional issues and impacts

– exemption from DRI process

11


Sector Plan Guiding PrinciplesSector Plan Guiding PrinciplesSector Plan Guiding PrinciplesSector Plan Guiding Principles•• Preserve Rural Character and Preserve Open Space Preserve Rural Character and Preserve Open Space

•• Promote Sustainable and Livable CommunitiesPromote Sustainable and Livable Communities

•• Promote Environmental SustainabilityPromote Environmental Sustainability

•• Manage Water ResourcesManage Water Resources

•• Provide Adequate Services and FacilitiesProvide Adequate Services and Facilities

•• Minimize Traffic ImpactsMinimize Traffic Impacts

•• Promote Economic SustainabilityPromote Economic Sustainability

•• Promote Fiscal SustainabilityPromote Fiscal Sustainability


Sector Plan Conceptual OverlaySector Plan Conceptual OverlaySector Plan Conceptual OverlaySector Plan Conceptual Overlay

12


Indian Trail Groves DRIIndian Trail Groves DRIIndian Trail Groves DRIIndian Trail Groves DRI

• Proposal included (2006): – 12,325 dwelling units (2.5 units/acre)

– 250,000 sq. feet of non-res. uses (207.5K Retail & 42.5K Office)

– Approximately 50% Open Space

– Contemplated Traditional Town Development (TTD) Zoning

– Proposed regional uses and large scale water management features

– Public Benefits provided

– Extensive road network impacts

• Withdrawn per FS 380.06(10)(b) by TCRPC in ‘09


ITG DRI “Map H” (2007)ITG DRI “Map H” (2007)ITG DRI “Map H” (2007)ITG DRI “Map H” (2007)

13


PPROPOSEDROPOSED PPROJECTROJECTPPROPOSEDROPOSED PPROJECTROJECT


Indian Trails Grove (2015)Indian Trails Grove (2015)Indian Trails Grove (2015)Indian Trails Grove (2015)•• July:July:

– Submitted Land Use Amendment and Comprehensive Plan Text Applications to Palm Beach County

– Originally requested a separate amendment round, but withdrew the request

– In “16-B” Amendment Round

– Intent to have concurrent Planning and Zoning processes

14


Applicant’s Proposal:Applicant’s Proposal:Applicant’s Proposal:Applicant’s Proposal:• FLUA Amendment from RRRR--1010 (3,650.8 Acres) &

APAP (1,278.5 Acres) to a new FLU Designation “RR“RR--1.25” 1.25” (increase from 0.1 to 0.8 DU/acre)(increase from 0.1 to 0.8 DU/acre)

• Would increase from 365 units to 3,943 units

• Includes 225,000 square feet of non-res. uses

• Would remain in the Rural Tier

• Designates as Limited Urban Service Area (LUSA)

• Creates an Overlay for the project

• Adds exemption from Long Range Transportation Planning (FLUE Policy 3.5-d)


Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (July)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (July)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (July)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (July)

15


Revised RequestRevised RequestRevised RequestRevised Request• Development Proposal :

– 3,943 Dwelling Units:

• 3,543 Single Family and Zero Lot Line detached units

• 400 Townhouse units

– 350,000 square feet of non-residential uses:

• 300,000 square feet of Commercial Retail

• 20,000 square feet of Light Industrial/Employment

• 30,000 square feet of Commercial Office


Revised RequestRevised RequestRevised RequestRevised Request• Open Space:

– Min. 50% of project in open space (incl. 1,000 acres of agriculture, 640 acres for regional water management)

– Min. 66.7% in open space when including trails, retention, buffers, etc. (33.3% would be the “development portion”)

• Also Includes:– Dedication of land for Civic Sites (Schools, Parks, Fire Station, etc.)

– Provision of 11.5 miles of pedestrian paths and 17 miles of equestrian trails

– Some workforce housing units

• Roadway Commitments:– Portions of 60th, 190th, Orange, connection to Hamlin

– $5M payment over “proportionate fair share”

16


Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (November)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (November)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (November)Applicant’s Conceptual Plan (November)


DDEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENT RREVIEWEVIEW PPROCESSROCESS, , ZZONINGONING AAPPLICATIONPPLICATION ANDAND ULDC ULDC

CCHANGESHANGES

DDEVELOPMENTEVELOPMENT RREVIEWEVIEW PPROCESSROCESS, , ZZONINGONING AAPPLICATIONPPLICATION ANDAND ULDC ULDC

CCHANGESHANGES

17


Zoning ProcessZoning ProcessZoning ProcessZoning Process

• Development Review Officer (DRO) Process

– Meets once a month

– Consists of departments and agencies (ex. Engineering, Parks, Health, Fire Rescue, etc.)

– Reviews for technical compliance with regulations

– Certifies project for public hearing

• Zoning Review

– Consistency with Unified Land Development Code

– Compatibility

– Local Plans and Overlays


Zoning ProcessZoning ProcessZoning ProcessZoning Process

• Public Notice

- Article 2 of the ULDC requires Notification of Public Hearings

- Newspaper Publication of advertisements

- Courtesy Notices via US Mail

- Notification Signs posted on property

- Additional Notification to Adjacent Municipalities and Government Entities

• Staff Report prepared– Recommendation of Approval, Approval w/Conditions or Denial

18


Zoning Public HearingsZoning Public HearingsZoning Public HearingsZoning Public Hearings

• Zoning Commission– Appointed citizens

– Vista Center, 2300 N. Jog Road, West Palm Beach

• Board of County Commissioners Hearing– Elected officials

– Governmental Center, 301 N. Olive Ave, West Palm Beach

• These Public Hearings are ‘quasi-judicial’


• Application submitted on July 15, 2015

• Request to rezone to Rural Residential Planned Unit Development (RR-PUD)

•3,943 Single Family Dwelling Units

•225,000 square feet of Commercial Retail Uses

• Zoning application has not yet been updated to reflect the revised Comprehensive Plan application

Zoning ApplicationZoning Application

19


Unified Land Development Code Revision

• Concurrent with the Comprehensive Plan amendments and Rezoning petition are Code Revisions to address changes in the Comprehensive Plan.

• Amendments include changes to the Rural Residential Planned Unit Development (RR-PUD), and other technical changes necessary to implement the Indian Trails Grove project.

• Amendments will go before LDRAB/LDRC, prior to the BCC.


Zoning Web Links Zoning Web Links

http://www.pbcgov.com/pzb/indian_trails/index.htmhttp://www.pbcgov.com/pzb/indian_trails/index.htm

Application materials can be viewed by the public.

County Agencies are still reviewing the application.

The next re-submittal date for the DRO is November23, 2015

20


George Webb, P.E. County Engineer

TTRANSPORTATIONRANSPORTATIONTTRANSPORTATIONRANSPORTATION

November 10, 2015


Daily Trips for Different Development OptionsDaily Trips for Different Development OptionsDaily Trips for Different Development OptionsDaily Trips for Different Development Options

Scenario Land Use Density/IntensityNet Daily

TripsI - Current FLU Residential (Single Family) 365 Dwelling Units

~3,650Non-Residential None

II - Previous Request

Residential(Single Family) 3,943 Dwelling Units

~ 46,077General Commercial 225,000 sf

Private Civic 40.93 ac

Public Civic 65.96 ac

Civic Site for Misc. Use 11.26 ac

III - Current Request

Residential (Single Family) 3,678 Dwelling Units

~ 47,115

Residential (Condo / TH) 265 Dwelling Units

General Office 30,000 sf

General Commercial 300,000 sf

Light Industrial 20,000 sf

Private Civic

Church 42,689 sf

School 39.95 ac

Public Civic

Fire Station 5.16 ac

District Park 19.94 ac

Regional Park 40.86 ac

Civic Site for Misc. Use 11.26 ac

21


Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share-- The Old Way (Concurrency) The Old Way (Concurrency) --Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share

-- The Old Way (Concurrency) The Old Way (Concurrency) --

Road needs to be widened to meet TPSRoad needs to be widened to meet TPS

Wait till others make the improvement

with others’ money

Reduce development size to not require the improvement and not pay for improvement

Pay for or build the entire improvement

with your own money and then start

impacting roads

Developer OptionsDeveloper Options

This is This is

ConcurrencyConcurrency


Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share-- The Current Way (Prop Share) The Current Way (Prop Share) ––

(FL Statute, Section 163.3180) (FL Statute, Section 163.3180)

Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share-- The Current Way (Prop Share) The Current Way (Prop Share) ––

(FL Statute, Section 163.3180) (FL Statute, Section 163.3180)

Road needs to be widened to meet TPSRoad needs to be widened to meet TPS

Wait till others make the

improvement with their money

Reduce development size to not require the improvement and not pay for improvement

Pay for part of the total improvement and start impacting

road right away

Developer OptionsDeveloper Options

This is NOT Concurrency – it

is Prop Share

22


Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share-- The Current Way (Prop Share) The Current Way (Prop Share) --

Concurrency and Prop ShareConcurrency and Prop Share-- The Current Way (Prop Share) The Current Way (Prop Share) --

Capacity Now (e.g., 6,000)

Improved Capacity (e.g., 10,000)

Indian Trails Grove Traffic (2,000)

New Capacity Created (4,000)

•• Prop Prop Share = Share = 2,0002,000//4,0004,000 = 50%= 50%

•• (Indian Trails Grove (Indian Trails Grove pays 50% of the cost of widening)pays 50% of the cost of widening)


How to Best Utilize the PropHow to Best Utilize the Prop--Share Money?Share Money?How to Best Utilize the PropHow to Best Utilize the Prop--Share Money?Share Money?

• Example: Roads A, B, C, and D are all over capacity with Indian Trails Grove traffic.

•Road A

•Road B

•Road C

•Road D

• Use the Total Prop Share Funds for Roads A,B,C & D

($1,000,000) to Improve Road D only (for a cost of $1,000,000)

• Roads A,B, and C each now has 100% funding shortfall

and each will be over capacity

RoadTotal Improvement

Cost ($)Indian Trails

Grove Prop ShareIndian Trails Grove Prop

Share Amount ($)

A1,000,000 25% 250,000

B1,000,000 25% 250,000

C 1,000,000 25% 250,000

D 1,000,000 25% 250,000

23


Priorities for Roadway ImprovementPriorities for Roadway ImprovementPriorities for Roadway ImprovementPriorities for Roadway Improvement

Using Prop Share Money:• Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd

• Northlake Boulevard

Current 5-Year Road Program:• SPW: Orange to Northlake: Widen 2L to 4L in FY 2016

SPW/Northlake Intersection: Improvement in FY 2016

• Northlake: SPW to Coconut: Widen 2L to 4L in FY 2016

• SR-7: Okee to 60th: Construct and widen 2L to 4L FY 2016

60th to Northlake: Construct 4L in FY 2017 and 2018


Location of Indian Trails Grove DevelopmentLocation of Indian Trails Grove DevelopmentLocation of Indian Trails Grove DevelopmentLocation of Indian Trails Grove Development

Avenir

Minto

Iota

Indian Trails Grove

24


Indian Trails Grove Trip Distribution Indian Trails Grove Trip Distribution Indian Trails Grove Trip Distribution Indian Trails Grove Trip Distribution


Impacted Roads in VicinityImpacted Roads in VicinityImpacted Roads in VicinityImpacted Roads in Vicinity

Roads From To Assigned Trip %

Daily Trips Added

Year 2015 Daily

Northlake Blvd SPW Rd Beeline Hwy 25% 11,000 33,000

Seminole PrattWhitney Road

60th StPersimmon Blvd

45% 20,000 17,000

Persimmon Blvd

OkeechobeeBlvd

28% 12,000 18,000

Hamlin Blvd 180th Ave SPW Rd 18% 9,000 3,000

Orange Blvd180th Ave SPW Rd 21% 10,000 2,000

SPW Rd Coconut Blvd 6% 2,400 8,000

60th Street180th Ave SPW Rd 54% 26,000 3,900

SPW Rd Coconut Blvd 17% 8,000 N/A

25


Road Road WideningsWidenings to Meet LOSto Meet LOSRoad Road WideningsWidenings to Meet LOSto Meet LOS


Next Next Next Next

• Avenir Daily Trips ~ 58,171

• Iota Daily Trips ~ 10,000

26


Public Hearing TimelinePublic Hearing TimelinePublic Hearing TimelinePublic Hearing Timeline

• Dec. 11: Planning Commission/LPA Hearing

• Jan. 20: BCC Transmittal Hearing

• TBD: LDRAB/LDRC Hearing—ULDC Amendments

• TBD: BCC—Permission to Advertise & 1st ULDC

• TBD: Zoning Commission Hearing

• Apr. 27?: BCC Adoption Hearing

• TBD: Adoption of ULDC Amendments; Rezoning Hearing

• For the most up-to-date information visit:

•• http://www.pbcgov.com/pzb/indian_trails/index.htmhttp://www.pbcgov.com/pzb/indian_trails/index.htm

Documents

IINDIANDIANNDIANNDIAN N TRAILS G PUBLUBLICIC …discover.pbcgov.org/pzb/PDF/IndianTrailsGrove/ITG Info... · 2011-10-15 · Please hold questions until the end of the presentatPlease