IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    1/9

    India - PSUs

    Prabodh Agrawal | [email protected]

    +91 22 4646 4697| |

    DD MMM YYYY

    Modi Inc All the Kings Jewels

    09 June 2014

    Printed reportsummary

    Institutional Equities

    Our 288 page printed report on Indian PSUstitled Mo d i I n c A l l t h e K i n g s Je w e l s willshortly reach your desks. PSU reforms arelikely to be among the first tasks for thenewly installed Modi Government, given thenew Premiers stellar track record in hishome state of Gujarat. The knock-on effect

    on the economy can be significant, sincemany PSUs operate in segments of vitalnational importance. Our top six picks, CoalIndia, SBI, REC, Power Grid, BEL, and

    ONGC, are expected to deliver 70-100%+ returns in our bullcase scenario, over the next three years.

    A lost decade: Indian PSUs lost their sheen in the past decade,

    buffeted by unfavourable government policies, slow decision-makingand a cyclical downturn. PSUs share of market cap in BSE100 hasshrunk from 32% in March 2005 to 20% currently. PSUs in Gujarat,on the other hand, have a different story to tell, with several of themoutperforming even well-managed private companies.

    Analysing 16 PSUs: We analyse 16 PSUs covered in this report onfive criteria: 1) Disruptive competition from private companies, 2)Beneficiary of higher economic growth in India, 3) Beneficiary of PSUreforms and conducive policies, 4) Strong balance sheets to leveragegrowth opportunities, and 5) Attractiveness of valuations.

    Key expectations on reforms: Faster environment clearances,easier land acquisition laws, increased availability of coal and gas,speedier power distribution reforms, augmenting of railway logisticsfor mines, and reducing fuel subsidies these are the mostcommon reform expectations of the 16 PSUs.

    Figure1: PSUsversusSensexSignificantunderperformance

    Source:IIFL

    Research,

    Bloomberg

    Figure2: ShareofPSUsandnonPSUsinBSE100smarketcapitalisation

    Source:IIFLResearch,Bloomberg

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    Jan04

    Jul04

    Jan05

    Jul05

    Jan06

    Jul06

    Jan07

    Jul07

    Jan08

    Jul08

    Jan09

    Jul09

    Jan10

    Jul10

    Jan11

    Jul11

    Jan12

    Jul12

    Jan13

    Jul13

    Jan14

    PSUs SensexRebasedto100

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Mar05 May06 Jul07 Aug08 Oc t09 De c1 0 Jan12 Mar13 May14

    PSU NonPSU(%ShareinBSE100)

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    2/9

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    3/9

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    4/9

    [email protected]

    India - PSUs

    4

    Institutional Equities

    Company Industry Shareof

    domestic

    production(%)

    Competitors

    BPCLOil

    Marketing

    (share

    ofconsumption)25 Nosignificantprivateplayer

    ONGC Upstreamoil 68 Cairn(16%),RIL(3%),OIL(10%)

    Bharat

    ElectronicsDefenceElectronics 57

    Foreignvendors(~40%),private

    playerssuchasL&T,TataPower

    SED(

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    5/9

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    6/9

    [email protected]

    India - PSUs

    6

    Institutional Equities

    Figure8: ShorttenureofCMDsatleadingPSUsCurrentCMD Term

    began

    Termends NoofCMDsin

    thelast10yrs

    1 BharatElectronicsSunilKumarSharma Jan2014 NA 5

    2 BHEL BPrasadaRao Oct2009 Dec2015 3

    3 BPCL SVaradarajan Oct2013 Sep2016 3

    4 CoalIndia Vacant 5

    5 GAIL BCTripathi Aug2009 Jul2019 2

    6

    HPCL

    Nishi

    Vasudeva

    Mar

    2014 Mar

    2016 37 IOC RSButola Jun2014 May2017 5

    8 NHPC GSaiPrasad(Addlcharge) Jul2012 Jul2014 6

    9 NMDC NarendraKothari Apr2014 Apr2019 4

    10NTPC Dr.ArupRoyChoudhury Sep2010 Sep2015 4

    11ONGC DKSarraf Mar2014 Sep2017 3

    12PFC

    M.K.

    Goel

    Sep

    2013 Sep

    2016 3

    13PowerGrid RNNayak Sep2011 Jun2015 3

    14REC RajeevSharma Nov2011 Oct2016 6

    15SAIL CSVerma Jun2010 Jun2015 3

    16SBI ArundhatiBhattacharya Oct2013 Sep2015 4

    Average 3.9

    Source:IIFL

    Research

    4.Strong balance sheet to leverage growthopportunities

    Strong balance sheets would allow these companies to leveragegrowth opportunities. If GoI moves towards making PSU

    managements more independent, these PSUs would be in theforefront for such reforms, since they can very well charter their own

    course and fend for themselves. Strong balance sheets reflect thefinancial prudence and avoidance of unnecessary risk taking bythese companies. The past few years have been replete with

    examples of companies hurting themselves by over-leveraging ortaking out-sized bets in the foreign exchange market.

    Figure9: BalancesheetstrengthandprofitabilityratiosCompany FY14

    Net

    Debt/Equity

    (x)

    Freecash

    flow/shareholders'

    funds(%)

    ROE

    (%)

    ROCE/ROA

    (%)

    1

    BharatElectronics

    (0.6) (6.9) 13.9

    17.1

    2 BHEL (0.2) 7.1 10.2 14.5

    3 BPCL 1.5 18.1 21.1 15.3

    4 CoalIndia (1.4) 54.4 34.8 47.4

    5 GAIL 0.4 10.7 15.7 14.9

    6 HPCL 3.3 5.1 7.9 5.9

    7

    IOC

    1.3 (0.8) 8.1

    8.6

    8 NHPC 0.5 (0.6) 6.5 7.4

    9 NMDC (0.6) 3.1 22.3 33.8

    10 NTPC 0.6 (6.0) 12.4 10.7

    11 ONGC 0.2 (11.0) 16.3 17.0

    12 PFC NA NA 21.1 3.0

    13 PowerGrid 2.2 (36.8) 12.7 8.6

    14 REC NA NA 24.6 3.3

    15 SAIL 0.5 (6.6) 4.4 4.8

    16 SBI NA NA 10.4 0.6

    Source:IIFLResearch,Prowess,Bloomberg

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    7/9

    [email protected]

    India - PSUs

    7

    Institutional Equities

    5.Attractiveness of valuationsFigure10: ValuationmatrixoftopSixPSUs

    Companyname CMP

    (Rs)

    MktCap

    (US$m)

    EPSCagr(%)

    (FY1416ii)

    P/E(x)

    (FY16ii)

    P/B(x)

    (FY16ii)

    ROE(%)

    (FY14)

    NetD/E(x)

    (FY14)

    BasecaseTP(Rs)

    1yr

    BullcaseTP(Rs)

    1yr 3yr

    1 ONGC 378 54,742 15.5 9.2 1.5 16.3 0.2 480 520 649

    2 CoalIndia 371 39,640 11.3 11.7 4.0 34.8 (1.4) 405 473 816

    3 SBI 2,542 32,115 20.0 9.3 1.1 10.4 NA 3,050 3,687 5,486

    4 PowerGrid 122 10,800 16.5 10.7 1.5 12.7 2.1 150 182 249

    5 REC 320 5,342 23.8 4.4 1.0 24.6 NA 408 461 812

    6 BharatElectronics 1,608 2,176 5.9 12.0 1.5 13.9 (0.6) 1,927 2,042 3,219

    Source:IIFLResearch,Bloomberg;pricesasatcloseofbusiness30May2014

    Potential for earnings upgrade and valuation re-ratingOur current earnings estimate and valuation multiple targets assumesome recovery in earnings growth trajectory and higher valuationmultiple for PSU stocks over the next two years. We also present a

    bull case scenario detailing areas of potential earnings upgrade, incase demand recovery is faster and stronger. This is likely to resultin valuation re-rating too for most stocks, underpinned by greatervisibility of economic reforms and their impact on the projectedearnings of PSUs. Based on this bull case scenario, we present one-year and three-year price targets for our top six PSU picks. The one-year and three-year bull case targets for all 16 PSUs can be found inthe printed report.

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    8/9

  • 8/12/2019 IIFL_India_PSUs_2014

    9/9