II Swiss Mobility Conference

II Swiss Mobility

Conference

Lausanne

29 – 30 June 2017

Massimiliano Rossetti Mario Boffi

Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca

Mobility, accessibility, carbon emission and right to education.

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Bari

Roma

Siena

Lucca

Parma

Udine

Pavia

Foggia

Napoli

Modena

Milano

Genova

Torino

Catania

MessinaPalermo

PotenzaSalerno

Cassino

Perugia

Firenze

Ferrara

Bologna

Venezia

Cagliari

L'Aquila

Camerino

Castellanza

Sharing Mobility Universita'

Campione dell'Indagine

37 Universities, 70.000 questionnaires (mean: 6% ) on line data collection in October 2016 Students , professors and employees.

North

1. Università degli Studi di Torino 2. Università degli Studi di Genova 3. Università "Carlo Cattaneo" – LIUC di Castellanza (Varese) 4. Università degli Studi di Milano 5. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano 6. Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca 7. Politecnico di Milano 8. Università degli Studi di Pavia 9. Università "Cà Foscari" di Venezia 10. Università degli Studi di Udine 11. Università degli Studi di Parma 12. Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia 13. Università degli Studi di Bologna 14. Università degli Studi di Ferrara

Centre

1. Scuola IMT Alti Studi di Lucca 2. Università degli Studi di Firenze 3. European University Institute di Firenze 4. Università degli Studi di SIENA 5. Libera Università degli Studi "Maria SS. Assunta" di Roma 6. Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" 7. Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata" 8. Università degli Studi Roma Tre 9. Università degli Studi di Perugia 10. Università degli Studi de L'Aquila 11. Università degli Studi di Camerino 12. Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale

South

1. Università degli Studi di Napoli "L'Orientale" 2. Università degli Studi di Salerno 3. Università degli Studi della Basilicata 4. Università degli Studi di Foggia 5. Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro” 6. Politecnico di Bari

Islands

1. Università degli Studi di Messina 2. Università degli Studi di Catania 3. Università degli Studi di Palermo 4. Università degli Studi di Cagliari

National Travel Survey Sample

I European Conference on Sustainable Mobility at Universities

The questionnaire

1

Information on the

current place of work and

positions and on the

curriculum and place of

residence

2

Information on the travel

Home-University

3

Information on sharing

mobility

4

Information on mobility alternatives

(motility)

5

Information on the

characteristics of the private

means of transport

6

Information on travel

perceptions and attitudes

Information on working/study hours

Personal information

II Swiss Mobility Conference

13,0

3,6 2,8

18,8

33,5

27,5

,6 ,1 0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

30,0

35,0

Walk Bicycle Motorcycle Car Local Public Transport Train Sharing Mobility Other

How people travel

16,7

21,6 61,0

Active modes (walk and bicycle)

Private modes (car and motorcycle)

Public modes

Mode used for the longest distance

II Swiss Mobility Conference

17

22

61

How people travel

18,5%

11,6%

20,0%

14,8%

28,6%

31,6%

66,1%

59,1%

47,5%

0,0%

10,0%

20,0%

30,0%

40,0%

50,0%

60,0%

70,0%

North Centre South and Islands

Active modes (walk and bicycle) Private modes (car and motorcycle) Public modes

II Swiss Mobility Conference

17

22

61

How people travel

17,4%

23,8%

15,3%

12,3%

34,1%

18,2%

29,1%

18,7%

46,4%

57,1% 54,9%

68,4%

0,0%

10,0%

20,0%

30,0%

40,0%

50,0%

60,0%

70,0%

Small Universities (<10.000) Medium-sized Universities(10.000-20.000)

Large Universities (20.000-40.000)

Mega Universities (>40.000)

Active modes (walk and bicycle) Private modes (car and motorcycle) Public modes

II Swiss Mobility Conference

17

22

61

How people travel

17,0% 16,2%

12,2%

17,9%

43,1%

49,0%

64,4%

39,8% 38,5%

0,0%

10,0%

20,0%

30,0%

40,0%

50,0%

60,0%

70,0%

Students Professors-Researchers Employees

Active modes (walk and bicycle) Private modes (car and motorcycle) Public modes

13,7%

10,1%

7,0%

3,3%

6,1% 5,1%

0,0%

5,0%

10,0%

15,0%

Students Professors-Researchers Employees

Walk Bicycle

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Time travelled

28

28

25

30

30

28

26

29

27

18

28

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33

North

Centre

South

Small Universities (<10.000)

Medium-sized Universities(10.000-20.000)

Large Universities (20.000-40.000)

Mega Universities (>40.000)

Students

Professors-Researchers

Employees

Total

50

51

42

48

47

48

52

51

43

38

49

30 35 40 45 50 55

North

Centre

South

Small Universities (<10.000)

Medium-sized Universities (10.000-20.000)

Large Universities (20.000-40.000)

Mega Universities (>40.000)

Students

Professors-Researchers

Employees

Total

Distance travelled

Minutes spent to reach the University Distance (Km travelled) from home to the University

II Swiss Mobility Conference

10,0%

3,3%

9,2%

1,0%

4,2%

8,6%

1,0%

4,0%

13,4%

4,4%

3,5%

1,6%

5,3%

5,5%

0,7%

2,8%

3,6%

3,0%

3,9%

0,5%

7,7%

5,6%

1,1%

2,3%

10,2%

3,7%

6,5%

1,1%

5,1%

7,0%

0,9%

3,3%

Car sharing free floating

Car sharing station based

Bike sharing

Scooter sharing

Bus/Van sharing

Ride sharing/carpooling

Park sharing

Mobility providersand aggregators

North Italy Universities Center Italy Universities South Italy Universities Total

Alone 72% trips (82% within professors)

How many people use shared mobility

II Swiss Mobility Conference

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Trip Sustainability

Fully Sustainable: all trips by active mobility, TPL, sharing mobility or every combination of those modes.

Moderately Sustainable: trips by private modes but in combination with sustainable modes.

Unsustainable: trips by only private car intense vehicle

Range sustainable trips

49% 75%

- Employees - Male - small size - South

- Students - female - Large size - North.

Fully unsustainable trips

II Swiss Mobility Conference Trip Sustainability

always sometimes often No car

Fully sustainable trips per car availability Fully unsustainable trips and distance

Trip sustainability and income

Students Employees

Students Employees

Fully unsustainable Moderately sustainable Fully Sustainable

II Swiss Mobility Conference

0,33

0,12 0,25 0,20

0,31 0,39

0,34 0,70 0,44

0,33 0,20

0,18

0,16

0,41 0,46

0,21

0,67

0,04

0,30

0,36 0,23

0,67

0,28

0,70

0,23 0,31

0,39

0,17

-100%

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

-150% -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200%

% S

post

amen

ti pi

enam

ente

sos

teni

bili

% Auto sempre disponibile

Fully

su

stai

nab

le t

rip

s

Trip Sustainability

Car always available

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Mobilità degli Studenti Universitari - Stima della CO20 200 400100

Km CO2 Universities assessment

Carbon Footprint:

Main mode

distance “home-university”

Emission factor

Frequency per year

II Swiss Mobility Conference

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

FerraraParma

Genova

Milano

Torino

Bologna

Firenze

Venezia

Pavia

Esri, DeLorme, GEBCO, NOAA NGDC, and other contributors

Mobilità degli Studenti Universitari - Stima della CO20 50 10025

Km CO2 Universities assessment

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Daily CO2 per capita

*Only students ** Only employees

kg

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Bari

Roma

Udine

Siena

Parma

Pavia

Foggia

Napoli

Milano

Genova

Torino

Catania

MessinaPalermo

Cassino

Perugia

Ferrara

Firenze

Bologna

Venezia

Camerino

Cagliari

L'Aquila

Castellanza

Sources: Esri, USGS, NOAA

Mobilità degli Studenti Universitari

CO2 pro capite

basso

medio-basso

medio-alto

alto0 250 500125

Km

Commuters contribution at Universities

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Increase the active role of the University in the mobility governance at the urban and regional level. Increase the Public Transit usage, through policy agreement with transport companies, with a particular focus on students and employees that travel more than 40 km. to sustain the right to mobility as the right to education. Increase the active mobility, improving the accessibility to the University both at the infrastructure side and policy agreement. Development of new organizational set-up, innovative calendar and timetable of services and classes in order to shift, and therefore avoid the peak hours, the entrance and exit fluxes at the University.

• Increase the active role of the University in the mobility governance at the urban and regional level.

• Increase the Public Transit usage, through policy agreement with transport companies, with a particular focus on students and employees that travel more than 40 km. to sustain the right to mobility as the right to education.

• Increase the active mobility, improving the accessibility to the University both at the infrastructure side and policy agreement.

• Development of new organizational set-up, innovative calendar and timetable of services and classes in order to shift, and therefore avoid the peak hours, the entrance and exit fluxes at the University.

Conclusion and future goals

II Swiss Mobility Conference

Mobility Manager Office: Matteo Colleoni – matteo.colleoni@unimib.it

Massimiliano Rossetti – massimiliano.rossetti@unimib.it Mario Boffi – mario.boffi@unimib.it

Sustainability Office: bicocca.sostenibile@unimib.it

www.unimib.it/bicoccasostenibile