Upload
lester-henderson
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
i. enhance agricultural competitiveness while limiting further environmental degradation.
ii. develop food systems which enhance the social security of the more vulnerable.
iii. create more rural employment opportunities to reduce labour migration and urbanisation.
IGP Regional Policy PrioritiesEstablished during s/holder dialogues 2003-04
GECAFSConceptual Framework
Conditions&
Scenarios
CurrentFood Systems
AdaptedFood Systems
Vulnerability & Impacts
Feedbacks
Adaptation
DecisionSupport
DecisionSupport
Conditions&
Scenarios
CurrentFood Systems
AdaptedFood Systems
What will be the consequences of changed
water management on rural livelihoods, intra-
regional trade, GHG emissions and water
tables?
How will GEC and increasing non-farm demands affect change in water supply and demand and consequent food system vulnerability?
How can changes in water management (e.g. though policy instruments and/or agronomic aspects) reduce
food system vulnerability to GEC?
IGP Western Sub-Region Example GECAFS Questions
• high productivity – food surplus region• high investment in infrastructure• major use of fertilisers and ground-water for irrigation• in-migration of labour
DecisionSupport
Conditions&
Scenarios
CurrentFood Systems
AdaptedFood Systems
How would diversification effect
rural incomes, labour migration, water quality
and regional biodiversity?
How will GEC affect vulnerability of food systems to flooding and drought, and how will this exacerbate existing socio-economic inequities?
What are the market opportunities, social constraints and technical options for adapting food systems to GEC?
IGP Eastern Sub-Region Example GECAFS Questions
• low productivity – food deficit region• poor infrastructure and low inputs of fertilizer and water• high risk of flooding• out-migration of labour
Outputs from CPW&F BFP funding to GECAFS IGP
1. Food systems documented in five case study sites across the IGP and interactions with water stress and water management analysed.
2. Methodology developed for basin-scale analysis based on analysing the diversity of food systems and their vulnerability to water stress in diverse case studies.
3. Understanding improved of the vulnerability of food systems to interactive socio-economic and environmental stresses.
Conditions&
Scenarios
CurrentFood Systems
AdaptedFood Systems
Vulnerability & Impacts Feedbacks
Adaptation
DecisionSupport
1. Identify the vulnerability of case-study food systems in IGP to GEC in the context of socioeconomic issues/changes.
2. Enhance capacity within the APN scientific community to raise awareness of the vulnerability of case-study food systems in IGP to GEC within the policy making community.
3. Improve policy formulation by district and national institutions to enable and enhance district and national strategies for identifying adaptation strategies to reduce the vulnerability of IGP food systems to GEC.
GECAFS IGP APN ProjectMain Objectives
Conceptual & methodological research on generic topics based on science and policy issues identified in regional projects.
GECAFS Research Approaches
Policy-relevant research at regional-level on impacts,
adaptation and feedbacks based on improved conceptual
understanding and methods.
Conditions&
Scenarios
CurrentFood Systems
AdaptedFood Systems
Vulnerability & Impacts Feedbacks
Adaptation
DecisionSupport
• Indo-Gangetic Plain• Caribbean
• Southern Africa• Others?
• Food Systems Concepts• Vulnerability Concepts• Scenario Construction• Decision Support
IdentifyAdaptation
to GEC (Options)
Analyse Implications
(DS-Systems)
DevelopGEC - FSScenarios
(PlausibleFutures)
Assess Vulnerability
to GEC(Conditions)
GECAFSDecisionSupport(feedbacks,
trade-offs, ...)
Adapted Food Systems
Current Food Systems
StakeholdersResearchers
EstablishAgenda
GECAFS Decision Support Research
GECAFS Decision Support Researchraising awareness and analysing trade-offs
1. Establishing how best to establish and maintain dialogue between scientists and policy makers for GEC-food security research.
2. Learning how best to involve policy makers and resource managers in collaborative research, e.g. scenarios exercises.
3. Networking with science-policy and adaptive mgmt groups.
Australia Gabriele Bammer, ANU: Knowledge management, exchange and implementation.
Bangladesh Ahsan Ahmed, BUP: National case-study site research and coordination, and policy links.
India Rajinder Sidhu, PAU & Shiraz Wajih, GEAG: National case-study site research and coordination, and policy links.
Nepal Ajaya Dixit, NWCF: Project coordination, Nepal site research and coordination, and policy links.
New Zealand Will Allen, Landcare Research: Integrated information frameworks for decision making.
Pakistan Nazim Ali, GCISC: National case-study site research and coordination, and policy links.
USA Greg Kiker, UF: GECAFS decision support systems development and QnD.
GECAFS IGP APN ProjectMembers (PIs) involved