23
IDO Business Review June 14, 2018

IDO Business Review - Transportation.org€¦ · Design, Construction, Maintenance and Incident Management on ADOT Roads • Design and Administer Construction of 140 projects per

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • IDO Business ReviewJune 14, 2018

  • IDO Business ReviewJune 14, 2018

  • What is IDO?

  • What is IDO?

  • What is IDO?

    IDO is one of Six ADOT Divisions• Administrative Services Division• Motor Vehicle Division• Enforcement & Compliance Division• Multimodal Planning Division• Transportation System Management & Operations Division • Infrastructure Delivery & Operations Division• Accounts for 38% of all ADOT personnel (1400/3700)

  • What IDO does

    Design, Construction, Maintenance and Incident Management on ADOT Roads

    • Design and Administer Construction of 140 projects per year ($900M)

    • Maintain 29,000 Lane Miles • Incident Management includes Road Closures due to Crashes

    and Winter Storm Management (Pre-treat Roads and Plowing)

  • Where is IDO

    7 District Offices49 Maintenance Camps1300+ Personnel

    • 60% located outside of PhoenixCentralized Program & Project Delivery12 Major Areas

    • Project Management-PRO-LPA-JPA

    • Roadway-Bridge-Traffic• Environmental-Utilities-ROW• C&S-Construction & Materials

  • IDO Score Card Performance Metric Titles Custom Field JOP YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

    Breakthrough Metrics

    Task Order Execution Speed7/1/2017 Target 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

    69 Actual 52 34 65 33 51

    Contract Execution Speed7/1/2017 Target 90 150 135 120 110 100 90

    234 Actual 194 143 91 0 55

    Operational / Sustainment Metrics

    On-Time Construction Delivery Speed7/1/2017 Target 75% 63% 67% 70% 72% 74% 75%

    45% Actual 78% 63% 75% 57% 67%

    On-Time Development Delivery Speed7/1/2017 Target 100% 90% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    58% Actual 8% 21% 50% 50% 11%

    Pavement Treatments (Miles) Speed7/1/2017 Target 3000 0 200 400 400 300 200

    2680 Actual 157 213 219 628 390

    On-Budget Construction Delivery Cost7/1/2017 Target 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

    72 Actual 78% 75% 100% 100% 67%

    Bridge Condition Quality7/1/2017 Target 37% 37% 37% 37% 37% 37% 37%

    35.50% Actual 37% 37% 37% 37% 37%

    Custom Field Legend Performance to Targets Color Coding:Speed Go Faster (Respond, Decide, Resolve) 100% of TargetQuality Compliance, Customer Satisfaction Within 75% - 99% of TargetCost Dollars Saved Within 0% - 74% of TargetPeople Retain Employees / Safe Employees

  • Task Order Execution50 Day Target Semi- Steady State

    • 10 in May – 51 day Avg• Low 8 Days• High 90 Days• PMG (2) - 33• ROW (4) - 23• Bridge (2) - 87• EPG (2) – 86

    44 55 46 36 44 3152

    34

    65

    3351

    5050

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

  • 136

    213237 251

    0

    182 194143

    910 55

    240225

    210195

    180165

    150135

    120110

    100

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

    New Contract Execution240 Days to Target of 90 Days

    7 Executed in May• 55 Day Average• 5 were Temp PMs• YTD Ave= 176 Days (36)

  • State Engineer’s ReportMay 2018

    $24

    $351

    $1,589

    $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800

    Finalized in May

    Finalized FY to Date

    Active 98 Projects

    107 Projects

  • On-time Construction Delivery

    12 of 18 Delivered on Time• One was 3X 155 Contract Days• Shared with AGC monthly

    JOP 45% to Target of 75%

    44%

    82%63%

    100% 100%

    38%

    78% 63% 75%57%

    67%

    45%48%

    51%54%

    57%60%

    63%67%

    70% 72%74%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

  • On-time Development Delivery20-30-30-20

    100% is Target2 of 18 Delivered on Time• 8 months straight in Defcon 2• 1 Advertised Early• 16 Delayed One Month

    100%

    50%81%

    17%

    45%

    8%21%

    50% 50%

    11%

    60%65%

    70%75%

    80%85%

    90%95% 100% 100%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

  • On-time Development Delivery20-30-30-20

    Countermeasures• Does not appear to be a Clearance challenge

    • 123 ROW Clearances FYTD• 94 Utility Clearances FYTD• 102 CE’s FYTD (CE = Categorical Exclusion-Kismet)

    • Communication between C&S and PMG• Late Scope Changes

    • Perceived inability to say “no” to Districts and Local Agencies• Visual Management Good (Boards)• 40 Projects left (12 State and 28 CA) – Add Temp Supplemental

    Staff?• (4 Projects per week)

  • Pavement Treatments2086 miles treated in 2017

    3000 miles is target for 2018• Crack Sealing• Flushes

    107% of YTD Target Met• 2878/2700 Total = 107%• Outstanding Progress• 122 in June will hit target

    84 31 61

    451

    490

    154 157

    213 219

    628

    390200

    300

    400400

    200

    0 0

    200

    400 400

    200

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

  • Pavement Treatments

  • On-Budget Construction Delivery

    • 67% (12/18) did not exceed 5% threshold

    • Same project that went 3X over on time had 25% increase

    80% 72%

    25%

    100% 100%

    37%

    78% 75%

    100% 100%

    67%

    90% 90%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

  • Project Utilization • UT continues to increase• 3% over April

    IDO Design Groups, Project Management, C&S, EPG, and Districts Utilization - FY182017 2018

    Unit July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayRoadway 43% 46% 45% 44% 47% 43% 38% 52% 51% 49% 51%

    Eng Survey 40% 42% 39% 41% 56% 42% 37% 36% 43% 42% 31%Bridge 54% 57% 49% 49% 52% 49% 43% 51% 57% 48% 51%Traffic 52% 50% 53% 46% 50% 51% 37% 47% 51% 53% 53%RofW 44% 42% 42% 39% 44% 44% 29% 25% 33% 38% 42%U&RR 39% 41% 61% 58% 57% 49% 41% 44% 55% 49% 47%PMG 44% 51% 55% 55% 61% 53% 53% 68% 57% 57% 60%C&S 64% 65% 65% 63% 58% 58% 55% 61% 63% 56% 65%EPG 22% 29% 29% 28% 35% 35% 32% 37% 35% 38% 35%

    NW Dist 45% 50% 40% 38% 42% 39% 32% 39% 43% 42% 51%NC Dist 65% 70% 67% 67% 63% 53% 39% 45% 51% 63% 70%NE Dist 57% 53% 47% 46% 43% 35% 31% 36% 44% 51% 54%SE Dist 40% 44% 35% 35% 36% 32% 32% 44% 44% 34% 52%SC Dist 54% 61% 51% 57% 56% 51% 44% 55% 58% 54% 56%SW Dist 52% 58% 63% 60% 60% 50% 46% 51% 60% 57% 59%C Dist 57% 65% 63% 57% 64% 61% 57% 64% 69% 66% 70%

    Const&Mat 46% 46% 47% 46% 42% 43% 36% 37% 39% 47% 54%

    Monthly Avg UT% 48% 51% 50% 49% 51% 46% 40% 47% 50% 50% 53%YTD Avg UT% 49%

  • 2016 Long-Range Transportation Plan Revenues ($1.09 billion/yr.)

    $320

    Pavement Preservation/MaintenanceDedicated Regional Projects

    $520

    Non-Capacity Federal Program

    Total $1 billion/yr.

    Inter-Regional State Road Funding

    $389 No funding for Greater ArizonaNew Capacity as of 2028

    Average ADOT Funding Allocation(Millions of dollars)

    $91

    Constrained Funding OutlookAnnual Capital Improvement Program

  • IDO Out

    Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23