Upload
kayla-fraser
View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IDF Members meeting 2004
doi>
• 67 people, from 48 organisations– A larger number of attendees than ever
• Invited participants from other sectors – 32 from 28 non-member organisations
• Evolving into less of a “members meeting” and more a general DOI seminar. Consequences: – Relatively little time on internal matters for members. – Some non-members may need more background
• Less than last time on detailed technical discussions– Now moved to separate Interoperability Workshop tomorrow– Detailed discussion on Data Dictionary and relevance
• Presentations will be available to members on the member-only section of the DOI web site
doi>IDF meeting 2004
• Progress Report • Director’s summary • Updates from existing applications (RAs)
– Coffee break in middle
– Lunch
• DOI Tools and technologies:– Standards, Tools (API, Data Dictionary) – in outline only
• Where next: some topics • Policy issues in non-commercial use of identifiers• New uses of identifiers in rights applications
– Break
• New uses of identifiers for non-text data • Close and reception
Outline of the day doi>
Two background slides you’ve seen before:
ActivitytrackingActivitytracking
Full implementation
Full implementation
Initial implementation
Initial implementation
Single redirection (persistent identifier)
Metadata Other efforts, standards, etc
Multiple resolution
A continuing development activity
(1) DOI: development in three tracks
IDF
M RA
c
(2) Creation of an organisation
Key events since last meeting
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
Ten millionth DOI assigned
TIB becomes new General member
Nielsen BookData becomes RA
MPEG RDD agreed; IDF role as RA
RR Bowker becomes RA
mEDRA becomes new RA memberDTIC becomes new Affiliate member
43 National Libraries through CENL
doi>
1. Move to full implementation – metadata and multiple resolution
– Increasingly recognised that DOI has worked out the principles and offers solutions
– Now (slowly) moving to use these features– RAs are the front line, but need common underpinnings
2. Continued interaction with others - Good progress with standards organisations (more this
afternoon) and “marketing” explanations- Continued efforts to go beyond text
3. IDF remains sound and on track - Growth of RAs
- Number of RAs increasing- Activities of RAs widening and deepening
- Evolution of Working Groups - Evolution of infrastructure
Main themes in 2004 doi>
1. Move to full implementation – metadata and multiple resolution
– Increasingly recognised that DOI has worked out the principles and offers solutions
– Now (slowly) moving to use these features– RAs are the front line
2. Continued interaction with others - Good progress with standards organisations (more this
afternoon) and “marketing” explanations- Continued efforts to go beyond text
3. IDF remains sound and on track - Growth of RAs
- Number of RAs increasing- Activities of RAs widening and deepening
- Evolution of Working Groups - Evolution of infrastructure
Main themes in 2004 doi>
www.epsltd.com
IDF Annual Meeting, June 2004DOI in context
What do we need to make our vision work?
Certainty of recall Demonstrable authenticity of
recalled object Effective relationship mapping and
multi-linking Organised metadata as primary
level content management This is the promise that DOI must deliver
Tools for description
bymetadata
Internet Resolution
Numbering scheme
Policies
doi>
Relationships, metadata, and DOI
• DOIs could e.g. resolve an ISTC to its ISBNs.
• Multiple resolution allows one entity to be resolved to multiple other entities
• embody a parent-children relationship, or any other relationship. • a feature of the Handle technology, but Handle per se (deliberately) has no pre-existing constraints to make a useful framework (like spreadsheet software )• Used by some RAs for their own applications: CDI MultiLinks
• DOI is an application of Handle which adds this constraint (like a spreadsheet application already written, to add data to).
• In DOI the constraints come from the metadata which defines the entities, • Which is the data dictionary approach: enables one to express relationships• Enables the relationships to be interoperable • Application Profiles (grouping) and Services
Focus of tomorrow’s workshop
doi>
1. Move to full implementation – metadata and multiple resolution
– Increasingly recognised that DOI has worked out the principles and offers solutions
– Now (slowly) moving to use these features– RAs are the front line
2. Continued interaction with others - Good progress with standards organisations (more this
afternoon) and “marketing” explanations- Continued efforts to go beyond text
3. IDF remains sound and on track - Growth of RAs
- Number of RAs increasing- Activities of RAs widening and deepening
- Evolution of Working Groups - Evolution of infrastructure
Main themes in 2004 doi>
Marketing the concept
• Promoting basic concepts is a role of IDF• Simplified Handbook • DOI Factsheets (on web site) • Simplified presentations (on web site)
• Director focusses on basic infrastructure and applications in new areas• e.g. Persistent Identifiers • e.g. JISC DRM, CODATA, etc
• RAs focus on building applications in their existing sectors
doi>
Update on some key relationships
• EAN/UCC (to become GS1)• Following on from last years interactions• Discussions under way; we have been asked to make a proposal
• CONTECS:DD consortium • Presentations to MPA and IFPI/RIAA• offering DOI as a tool to implement MPEG RDD
• Mi3P (music industry)• Still interested but other issues to deal with
• cIDF (Japan)• Not followed up but new member MMG
• NISO, Editeur, ISO, MPEG etc • (see later Standards discussion)
doi>
1. Move to full implementation – metadata and multiple resolution
– Increasingly recognised that DOI has worked out the principles and offers solutions
– Now (slowly) moving to use these features– RAs are the front line
2. Continued interaction with others - Good progress with standards organisations (more this
afternoon) and “marketing” explanations- Continued efforts to go beyond text
3. IDF remains sound and on track - Growth of RAs
- Number of RAs increasing- Activities of RAs widening and deepening
- Evolution of Working Groups - Evolution of infrastructure
Main themes in 2004 doi>
Cumulative DOI Deposits – by RA
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
Cumulative number of DOI Deposits
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Period
Cumulative No. of DOI Deposits
BowkermEDRATSOLONCAL EnpiaCDI CrossRef
Currently 9 RAs doi>
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
No. of DOI Prefixes assigned
Dec- 00 Dec- 01 Dec- 02 Dec- 03 2004 to date
Period
DOI Prefixes Assigned
Bowker
mEDRA
TSO
CAL
LON
Enpia
CDI
CrossRef
DOI Prefixes assigned – by RA per year doi>
The planned conversion from membership support to operational support is happening:
Year Number of RAs (end year) %of revenues RAs
1999 0 02000 1 <102001 3 202002 6 372003 7 472004 F 10 582005 F 14 68
Increase in RA funding doi>
Number of Members: 33 (6 Charter, 16 General, 9 RA and 2 Affiliate)
1 @ $70K4 @ $40K13 @ $35K1 @ $23.5K*2 @ $20K* 9 @ $11.5K2 @ $5K1 @ $1K*
• One cancellation (OCLC): 96% $ renewals achieved• No increases in fees for either members or RA fees in 2004
* Special Arrangements
doi>Membership in 2004
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Amount in
$,000s
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Year
I DF Loan Payback f rom 2005 - 2009
Loan AmountOutstanding
Forecast repayment of loans doi>
Assumes no new RAs, same membership
IDF Working Groups
RA Working Group• Now very active; separate chair (Ed Pentz)
Technology Working Group • Small group, but occasionally active esp on URI etc
Original concept was for other application-focus working groups:• DOI-X (Cross-Linking) : led to CrossRef • DOI- E book: led to useful output; impact on e.g. AAP Study
Need for application–focussed WGs may lessen • In commercial area, as RAs take off, possible competition• Patents; new WG investigating what can be done in “pre-competitive” mode; possible collaborative funding • Scientific data? Commercial activity expected to be less active?• Other media types etc – at least for initial feasibility work
“Affiliate Member” status was invented for WGs; still relevant?
doi>
IDF Infrastructure
Resolution • Continued IDF relationship with CNRI • Participation in Handle System AC (IDF, CrossRef) • Proxy server policies recently established by RAWG • Options for scaling up being examined
Data Dictionary • Following same model of “outsourcing” • OntologyX • Initially on consultancy basis, moving to longer term relationship
GovernanceBoard (and RAWG) are continuing to review evolution of membership representation, fees etc
• Vice Chair RAWG
doi>
2004 Board Elections doi>
Ch 1
Ch 2
Ch 3
Ch 4
Ch 5
Ch 6
Gen 1
Gen 2
Gen 3
Gen 4
RA 1
RA 2
RA 3
RA 4
06 0700 01 02 03 04 05
AAP
Elsevier
John Wiley & Sons
McGraw-Hill
IPA
Vacancy
Ovid
Copyright Clearance Center
Knowledge Solutions
CrossRef
TSO
Learning Objects Network
Springer Verlag
Copyright Agency Ltd
2004 Board seats up for election
Summary of 2004 Board Election timetable
Seats to be elected: 1 Charter, 3 General (1 seat for 1yr term only) 1 RA Member
Nominations to be received by: 1st July 2004Last date for votes: 15th July 2004Result announcement: 16th July 2004Election of Board Officers: (+ 4 weeks) 13th August 2004
All details will be sent to members and will be on web site
doi>
1. Move to full implementation – metadata and multiple resolution
– Increasingly recognised that DOI has worked out the principles and offers solutions
– Now (slowly) moving to use these features– RAs are the front line
2. Continued interaction with others - Good progress with standards organisations (more this
afternoon) and “marketing” explanations- Continued efforts to go beyond text
3. IDF remains sound and on track - Growth of RAs
- Number of RAs increasing- Activities of RAs widening and deepening
- Evolution of Working Groups - Evolution of infrastructure
Main themes in 2004 doi>