Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

    1/5

    Identify and analyse the most important political, social and economic changes

    in Germany between 1815 and 1871.

    Germany had an interesting development on its economical, political and sociallevel between 1815 and 1871. It seen many changes that have brought it from

    1815 - with the Congress of Vienna - in 1871 - with the foundation of the

    German Reich. This essay will discuss the changes that Germany faced

    between 1815 and 1871: starting from The Congress of Vienna, following the

    different developments that occurred on the political, economic and social

    level, passing through the changes that took place in the 1830 s until 1848.

    And then stressing the importance of the French Revolution until 1862, the

    year in which Bismarck was chosen prime minister by William I. And finally, the

    1871, year of the Unification of Germany.

    As we said earlier, an important event for Germany was the Wiener Kongress

    (The Congress of Vienna) held between October 1814 until June 1815 that

    brought changes on the political, economic and social level. The meeting, held

    between the most important states of Europe (Russia, Britain, Prussia, France

    and Austria), happened after Napoleons defeat and its purpose was to bring

    stability in Europe. One of the most relevant point which was discussed was the

    territorial reorganization after the collapse of Napoleons Rheinbundin 1814

    (Allinson, 2002: p. 12). Prussia and Austria had the largest territorial changes:

    Prussia lost some regions of Poland but gain some along the Rhine (Allinson,2002: p. 12) and parts of the Kingdom of Saxony. On the other hand, Austria

    earned territories from Italy (the Adriatic coast and the North of the country)

    but lost territories on the Rhine southern part and in the Low Countries

    (Allinson, 2002: p. 12).

    For Germany it was different: fearing that it might become a potential

    competitor the others representatives members of the Europeans countries did

    not want to see Germany unified. It was also the problem of Austria and Prussia

    that concerned them (Allinson, 2002: p. 12); the political issues that were

    between the two countries could cause, they fought, problems for the hole

    Europe, and how we said before, the main idea was to bring peace in Europe so

    they felt responsible to take the right choices. In 1815 was created the German

    Confederation, under Austrian control, which included some parts of Poland

    and Czech territories, other small states form different countries, part of

    Prussia and Habsburg Empire (Allinson, 2002: p. 13). So, Germany, because of

    its configuration, was fragmented and as a result it could not work either

    economically or politically as an entity, as several German states were linked

    with foreign countries (www.docs.google.com). The problem that this situation

    raised was the fact that all this states together did not created a true Bund(Allinson, 2002: p. 13). To find a balance between all of them seemed almost

    impossible. We may say that every ruler of each state wanted to have their

  • 8/8/2019 Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

    2/5

    own control over it, so to arrive at an agreement resulted difficult. When this

    decisions were taken was not taken into account the opinion of the population

    and because of the present situation in Germany, between 1815 and 1818

    another question was raised: the national identity. Even if Germany was

    divided still we can see the desire for a united nation from the part of thesociety. Even if we have a clear idea about the conflict between the middle

    class and the aristocracy1 bought, even if with different interests, were aiming

    for the same thing: unity. But now, more then in the past, at the concept of

    national identity (Allinson, 2002: p. 15) come linked the political view

    (Allinson, 2002: p. 13). Many students felt the need to get involved in a

    patriotic movement: the Burschenschaften2(Allinson, 2002: p. 16).

    Economically speaking, the differences between the commercial codes, the

    industry and the monetary systems did not helped Germany to develop like

    other countries did. With the customs low of 1818 Prussia was trying to simplifyand make more efficient the administrative and fiscal parts. Even if some of the

    German states did not agree with this law, the purpose was to introduce an

    uniform tariff and to help with the integration of different parts of the territories

    (www.docs.google.com). Even so, all the attempts for a unified Germany,

    seemed to be a very delicate question for many German states.

    In the 1830 s many German states joined the German Customs Union

    because of the political and economical problems. Everything was under

    Prussias economic control (Allinson, 2002: p. 17). All this happened because

    economically speaking Germany in the 1830s was presenting a wide range of

    ineffective merchandise. The problem was that this markets were divided one

    from another because of the lack of an adequate transport system

    (www.docs.google.com) and because of the different economic system of each

    individual state. While many European states were on their way of reaching an

    industrial stability, Germany in the 1830s was only at the beginning. But with

    the development of the communication systems, as railways and roads, the

    economy began to grow. The states, that first were divided on from another,

    now started to get more closer: the exchanges of information, ideas and news

    helped also to give a more clear idea of national meaning (Allinson, 2002: p.18). Moreover, the political system, that first was under the form of rival

    independent states, now, with the growth of the industry seem to present a

    1 The victories of the middle class (between 1813 and 1815) made them gain more power by

    demonstrating that courage and presence of mind ( Bramsted, 1967: p. 37) was not only a

    privilege of the upper class. But even so the middle class could not reach the aims that they

    had: the same rights as the aristocracy. Moreover, the aristocracy was glorified by many

    writers. A clear example is the one offer by Bramsted; in his writing we can find an interesting

    part in which is presented the book of Adam Mller Die Elemente der Staatskunst. Mller pays

    homage to the aristocracy in one passage of his book: The nobility is the first and only

    necessary legal institution in the state (Bramsted, 1967: pp. 37 - 39).

    2 It was a student organization that first appeared in 1815; the members were in favour of the

    idea of an unified Germany.

  • 8/8/2019 Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

    3/5

    different configuration. All this changes were leading to the year of the

    Revolution. As for the social effects, we have a slow advance of middle class

    industrialization (Bramsted, 1967: p. 43). It is interesting to observe the

    conflict between the middle class and the aristocracy. The middle class

    started to gain more power over the aristocracy (Bramsted, 1967: p. 52).

    Another important date in the history of Germany, between 1815 and 1871, is

    the 1848, the date of the French Revolution. Inspired but the French example

    the German public involvement in politics was much more visible. If before

    1848 we can see little interest from the population to get involved in the

    political life, now the sense of patriotism increased (Bramsted, 1967: p. 68).

    But there was the problem of the goal of the revolution of 1848. According to

    Allinson (2002: p. 19) there was no unity of goal between the different classes:

    everyone was aiming for different results. For example, the middle class

    wanted to share the political power and was claiming for a change in the way inwhich the government was lead: they wanted a government based on a free

    parliamentary constitution (Bramsted, 1967: p. 68). Another important change

    for Germany in that year was based on the economic development that it took.

    Starting from this year onwards the economy embraced many positive changes

    and sow an expansion in the refineries, the factories, in the chemical works, in

    the banking system and the development of the communication and

    transportation fields (Bramsted, 1967: p. 107). This economic developments

    lead also to political changes: many political groups in society which wanted to

    change the configuration of Germany were strengthened (Hamerow, in theIntroduction, 1973: p. 6).

    Even if many of the decisions taken in that year did not last, there were some

    that have lasted effects: the different contrasts caused between revolutionary

    and counter revolutionary forces [...] helped to define the different political

    viewpoints within society (Allinson, 2002: p. 22) ,the rural population was

    heading towards the cities because of the new jobs that the industrialization

    was offering and the economic developments helped the industrial revolution

    (Allinson, 2002: p. 22). With the return of the social and political stability

    Germany gain also an economic balance which set up the rules between therural and urban: the last one gained an important place in the society

    (Hamerow, in the Introduction, 1973: p. 5).

    Another important change for Germany that lead to the unification in 1871 was

    when Otto von Bismarck was chosen prime minister by William I in 1862. His

    task was the one of defending the position of the crown (Hamerow, in the

    Introduction, 1973: p. 8). The opinions of the critics are very different when it

    comes to speak about Bismarck. For example, Allinson defines him an

    opportunist who made the most of the chances which presented themselves

    (2002: p. 24) while Hamerow believes that it would be a mistake to regard him

    as simply an opportunist bent on the acquisition of power (in the Introduction,

  • 8/8/2019 Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

    4/5

  • 8/8/2019 Identify and Analyse the Most Important Political

    5/5

    2. Otto von Bismarck, Reflections and Reminiscences, (edited with an

    introduction by Theodore S. Hamerow), New York: Harper & Row, 1968.

    3. Ernest K. Bramsted, Aristocracy and Middle Classes in Germany: social

    types in German literature 1830 1900, Chicago: The University of Chicago

    Press, 1967.

    4. Theodore S. Hamerow, The age of Bismarck: documents and interpretations,

    New York; London: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Websites

    1. www.docs.google.com.

    2. germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org.

    http://www.docs.google.com/http://www.docs.google.com/