Presented to IP attorneys this Fall.
- 1.
- Identifying and Controlling
- Intellectual Property Loss Exposures with Risk Management
Principles
- Associate General Counsel
- Intellectual Property Insurance Services Corp.
Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 2. Why Risk Management
- Risk Management- Management of the pure risks to which a
company might be subject. It involves analyzing all exposures to
the possibility of loss and determining how to handle these
exposures.
3. Better yet, Risk Management for Dummies
- 1.What can go wrong? (risk identification)
- 2.What can we do so it doesnt go wrong? (risk control)
- 3.How do we pay for it if it does go wrong? (risk
financing)
4. What is a Loss Exposure?
- In insurance, areas in which the risk of loss exists. Four loss
risk areas are: (1) property; (2) income; (3) legal vulnerability;
and (4) key personnel in an organization.
5. Loss Exposures Relating to IP:
- Protecting against others using the IP of your
organization(Income)
- Avoiding the use of others IP (Legal Vulnerability)
6. Potential Risk Treatments
- Once risks have been identified and assessed, all techniques to
manage the risk fall into one or more of these four major
categories:
7. Four Techniques:
- Avoidance(eliminate, withdraw from or not become involved)
- Reduction(optimize - mitigate)
- Sharing(transfer - outsource or insure)
- Retention(accept and budget)
8. Avoidance
- Used when the likelihood and severity of potential litigation
outweigh potential for gain.
- Importer receives a cease and desist letter from
competitor.Importer holds no IP on the product and manufacturer
will not indemnify for losses.Profit margin is low, inventory is
low, and noninfringing alternate products are readily
available.
- Prior to going to market, manufacturer obtains freedom to
operate opinions.Opinions rely primarily on arguments of invalidity
of competitors patents, rather than noninfringement.Competitor has
a history of litigation.
9. Reduction
- Risk reduction or "optimization" involves reducing the severity
of the loss or the likelihood of the loss from occurring.
- Established protocol to safeguard against infringing upon
IP
- Nondisclosure agreement and noncompetes used regularly
- Trusted advisor relationships- attorneys, accountants,
insurance agents
- everyday due diligence- trade shows, vendors
10. Sharing/Transfer
- Shifting risk from one party to another
- Indemnification and hold harmless agreements
- Alternate fee agreements for litigation
11. Insurance as a means for risk transfer
12. About IPISC
- Specialize in Intellectual Property (IP) insurance policies to
manage the costs associated with litigating IP cases.
13. Policies Offered
- Abatement Insurance (Enforcement)
- Unauthorized Disclosure Insurance
-
- Available as a rider to the above policies or stand alone
14. What Kinds of Intellectual Property Risks Can Be
Insured?
-
- Infringement Abatement(Enforcement) of:
-
-
- Trade Secrets/Confidential Information
15. About the Abatement Policy
- Reimburses Litigation Expenses toenforceintellectual property
against alleged infringers.
16. Abatement Insurance
-
- Claims Made and Reported Policy
-
-
- Minimum 2% of claim limits
-
-
- 20% [can buy down co-pay to 10%]
17. What Kinds of Intellectual Property Risks Can Be
Insured?
-
- Defense of Infringement Assertions:
-
-
- Trade Secret / Confidential Information
18. About the Defense Policy
- Reimburses Litigation Expenses todefendagainst charges of
intellectual property infringement and paydamages or
settlement.
19. Defense Insurance
-
- Claims Made and Reported Policy
-
-
- Higher Limits May be Available
-
-
- Minimum 2% of claim limits, higher limits may be required to
offset risk and/or premium.
20. Average Policy Premiums Based Upon Applicants Quoted
- Policy Limits $2MM/$2MM-Average Risk
- Coverage for:1 (one) Patent:$15,200
- Coverage for:1 (one) Product:$20,300
21. Additional Products Offered by IPISC
-
- First-party coverage to cover the unexpected loss of an
intellectual investment.Can cover loss of commercial advantage,
business interruption and/or redesign, remediation and reparation
activities.
- Unauthorized Disclosure of ConfidentialInformation
-
- Provides the legal expenses associated with accusations that
the insured has committed an unauthorized disclosure of another
partys confidential information, such as:
-
-
- Trade Secrets Privacy Policy Violations Personal Information
Break-Ins Software Programs
22. Coverage's available in standard commercial policies
- Some limited coverage does exist in commercial general
liability policies.
- Most likely as part of Advertising Injury
- If CGL coverage, insurer has a duty to defend
- Currently:2007 ISO CGL; Travelers; St. Paul; Chubb
23. Generalizations:
- CGL coverage for personal and advertising injury
- Caused by an offense arising out of your business
- Infringing upon anothers copyright, trade dress or slogan in
your advertisement.
- The use of anothers advertising idea in your
advertisement.
24. Specifics:
- Recent cases- trademark infringement lawsuit was covered under
advertising injury:
- -Super Duper, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Natl Mut. Ins. Co.,683
S.E.2d 792 (S.C. 2009)
- -General Cas. Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.,762
N.W.2d 572 (Minn. 2009)
25. 2007 ISO CGL Form
- Infringement of Copyright, Patent, Trademark Or Trade
Secret
- Personal and advertising injury arising out of the infringement
of copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual
property rights .Under this exclusion, such other intellectual
property rights do not include the use of anothers advertising idea
in your advertisement.
26. Travelers Policy Forms
- Splits up personal injury and advertising injury into separate
offenses
- No longer includes use of anothers advertising idea in your
advertisement
27. St. Paul Policy Forms
- Advertising injury offense covers libel, slander, and
unauthorized use of any advertising material, or any slogan or
title, of others in your advertising.
- Exclusions:intellectual property infringement
- Nor will we cover any other injury or damage or medical
expenses alleged in a claim or suit that also alleges any such
infringement or violation
28. St. Paul continued
- But Nor will we apply this exclusion to advertising injury that
results from the unauthorized use of any:
- Copyrighted advertising material;
- Trademarked title; of others in your
29. nor will we cover exclusion
- -upheld inMolecular Bioproducts, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins.
Co.,2003 WL 23198852 (S.D. Cal. July 9, 2003) because it was clear
and explicit
- -but seeAlign Tech., v. Federal Ins. Co.,2009 WL 4282098 (N.D.
Cal. 2009).Language did not put an insured reasonably on
notice
30. Chubb policy
- Similar language to the St. Paul except:
- This exclusion applies, unless such injury:
- Is caused by an offense described in the definition of
advertising injury; and
- does not arise out of, give rise to or in any way relate to any
actual or alleged assertion, infringement or violation of any
intellectual property law or right, other than one described in the
definition of advertising injury.
31. Other Specialty Markets
- Usually stand alone policies
- Generally accepted definitions- IP insurance versus Media
Insurance
- The term Media Insurance is used to describe liability coverage
against allegations arising out of communications activities of the
organization.
- Media insurance generally covers all infringement claims except
patent, however terms vary greatly.
32. Companies offering some form of patent infringement
coverage:
- SeeThe Betterley ReportApril 2010 www.betterley.com
33. recap
- Avoidance(eliminate, withdraw from or not become involved)
- Reduction(optimize - mitigate)
- Sharing(transfer - outsource or insure)
- Retention(accept and budget)
34. Retention
- Can be a self insurance plan, but often the inadvertent result
of failure to plan
- Must be used for current or preexisting losses
- Disadvantages: usually cannot spread the cost over a fixed
period of time; company may not have sufficient funds or credit to
survive the loss.
35. QUESTIONS? www.patentinsurance.com