I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    1/22

    Leader Task 5.1

    Partner name: UNIVE

    Contact: Stefano Soriani

    e-mail: [email protected]

    I.D 6.1.10 Post evaluation training

    First version

    Date March, 2013

    Author UNIVE team

    Resume The document presents the the objectives, structure and

    evaluation o the trainin! or!ani"ed #ithin the $E%&'( )apacit*

    +uildin! $lan and in particular o those trainin!s or!ani"ed to

    address the needs o the )&'Es -ocus is !iven to the

    $articipation trainin! course . /Trainin! o trainers, the 'patial

    ata inrastructure /'I and the Virtual Trainin! )ourse on

    Inte!rated )oastal one Mana!ement /Med(pen

    Pegaso Project

    People for Ecosystem based Governance

    in Assessing Sustainable development of

    Ocean and coast

    Funded by the European Union

    under FP7 ENV.2009.2.2.1.4

    Integrated Coastal Zone Management

    Specific Programme FP7

    Collaborative Projects

    Lar e scale inte ratin Pro ect

    Project coordination

    Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona

    UAB / Spain

    www.pegasoproject.eu

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    2/22

    2

    Summary

    1 )apacit* buildin! 3

    2 Trainin! needs 3

    21 Tar!et !roups 3

    3 $articipation Trainin! )ourse . Trainin! o Trainers

    31 Trainin! pro!ram 4

    32 Trainin! post evaluation 5

    4 'I 6

    42 Trainin! pro!ram 6

    43 7no#led!e evaluation 8

    4 Trainin! post evaluation 16

    5 Med(pen 18

    51 Trainin! objectives 18

    52 Trainin! pro!ram 18

    53 Trainin! post evaluation 18

    9 )onclusion 22

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    3/22

    3

    1. Capacity building

    :ithin the $e!aso, capacit* buildin! is strictl* related to the main objective o the project, namel*;

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    4/22

    maritime activit*, etc@ the National -ocal $oints /N-$s and the +lac= 'ea end users that represent

    the 5 countries supported b* the +') $', #hich orm a +lac= 'ea $anel to steer the adoption o a

    polic* similar to the I)M $rotocol or the +lac= 'ea

    -or the eAternal capacit* buildin! action plan, the tar!et !roups are; eAternal end.users such as decision

    ma=ers, !overnmental and non.!overnmental institutions, research institutions and eAperts, rom all the

    countries o the Mediterranean and the +lac= 'ea #hich are not directl* involved in $e!aso but can beinterested in bein! inormed, especiall* in the International )ooperation )ountries /I)$)

    The document, ho#ever, ocuses onl* on the trainin! or!ani"ed so ar or the )&'Es and the $E%&'(

    consortium In particular, it presents the $articipation trainin! course . /Trainin! o trainers, the 'patial

    ata inrastructure /'I and the Virtual Trainin! )ourse on Inte!rated )oastal one Mana!ement

    /Med(pen The ormer too= place in Venice rom the 31st o (ctober to the th o November 2011 The

    second trainin! #as developed in t#o phases; a irst e.learnin! course /14th &pril .14th >ul* 2012 ollo#ed

    b* a hands on trainin! #or=shop /22nd. 24th (ctober 2012, #hile the latter #as entirel* developed online

    /1th Ma* C 3rd 'eptember 2012

    3. Participation Training Course - Training of Trainers

    The event #as tar!eted to the $e!aso )&'E' that have eApressed their interest and need in trainin! on

    participator* tools and more speciicall* )&'E' team members that #ere responsible or the reali"ation o

    participator* approaches #ithin their )&'E The participation trainin! course.trainin! o trainers #as

    or!ani"ed b* UNIVE #ith trainers rom $&$BD&) and $lan +leu and too= place in the island o 'an 'ervolo

    /Venice.Ital* rom the 31st o (ctober to the 3rd o November 2011 The )&'Es o +ouches.du.Dhne

    /-rance, &e!ean 'ea Islands /%reece, North Febanon )oastal &rea and 'evastopol +a* /U=raine )&'E'

    declined the invitation to attend the trainin!

    The main objectives o the trainin! could be summari"ed as ollo#ed;

    1 To prepare participator* acilitators to appl* participator* approaches #ithin their )&'E

    2 To understand principles and tools or dealin! #ith sta=eholders /sta=eholder mana!ement

    3 To =no# ho# to prepare, conduct and ollo#.up on participator* events /in relation to )&'E :or=

    $lan and sta=eholder anal*sis

    To practice acilitation s=ills

    4 To contribute to capacit* buildin! or reali"ation o participator* approaches

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    5/22

    4

    Institution and role Participant

    Depresentatives o the Nile elta . E!*pt )&'E 'u"an 7holei . :aala aad aad &li

    Depresentative o the &l Goceima )oastal &rea . Morocco )&'E Nadia Mhammdi

    Depresentatives o the al*an.7H*ce!i" 'pecial $rotected &rea .

    Tur=e* )&'E

    Ulas &vsar . 'inem nder

    Depresentatives o the North &driatic )&'E Monica )amuo . -abri"ia +uono . Marco Tonino

    Depresentatives o the anube elta . Domania )&'E; and,

    anube

    Eu!enia Marin . Iuliana Nichersu

    Depresentative o the %uria )oastal De!ion . %eor!ia )&'E &miran %i!ineishvils=i

    Depresentative o $&$BD&) Marina Mar=ovic

    The $articipator* )oordinator o the $e!aso project >ulien Fe Tellier

    $&$BD&) consultant, Trainer %unter En!lisch

    Table 1: Participants of the Training for trainers course

    3.1 Training program

    The pro!ram #as based on an interactive trainin! approach, notabl* on practical eAercises or simulation o

    acilitation situations b* role pla*s These role pla*s #ere recorded and revie#ed b* video anal*sis

    $ersonal eedbac= allo#ed an intense learnin! eAperience or the participants Traditional lectures #ere

    =ept to a minimum Trainin! desi!n #as tailor.made to the needs o the participants /as eApressed in the

    participator* chec=list attached to the )&'E I document $articipants had to complete some preparator*

    #or= beore comin! to the trainin!; participants amiliari"ed themselves #ith the contents o several

    documents /or their speciic )&'E such as )&'E Identiication ocument, the sta=eholder anal*sis, the

    )&'E :or= $lan and the $articipator* %uide on $articipator* Methods Moreover, participants had to

    complete an eAercise on a case stud* beore the trainin! and identiied at least one core challen!e or their

    )&'E #ith re!ard to the application o participator* methods

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    6/22

    5

    The belo# table reports the detailed pro!ram o the trainin!

    Session Day 1 (Principles) Day 2 (Participatory process) Day 3 (Group facilitation) Day (!andling of difficult

    situations)

    08;00 h

    .10;4 h

    &rrival J De!istration

    :elcome $resentation roundTrainin! (bjectives einition

    o basic concepts

    /$articipation, 'ta=eholder,

    etc

    Dealisation o a participator*

    process /incl preparation andollo#.up o a participator*

    events

    Introduction to !roup

    acilitation The role o theacilitator Interaction bet#een

    acilitator and !roup The

    acilitation process

    The $roblem 'olvin! $rocess

    %roup d*namics Treatment odiicult situations

    11;00 h.

    13;00 h

    )ommunication as basis or

    participator* processes

    )ommunication theor* and

    eAercises /includin! eedbac=

    Importance o bod* lan!ua!e

    $reparation o sta=eholder

    meetin!s -acilitation tas=s

    -acilitation s=ills

    )ommunication rules

    Visualisation o results

    Treatment o diicult situations

    /continued

    1;00 h

    .14;4 h

    $rinciples o adult learnin!

    $rinciples o participator*learnin! and action

    )onduct o sta=eholder

    meetin!s 'el.anal*sis ointeraction processes

    $articipator* tools, methods and

    approaches Introduction o$E%&'( !uide &nal*sis o

    acilitation perormance

    evelopment o action plan or

    individual )&'E' iscussion ocapacit* buildin! or realisation

    o participator* processes #ithin

    the )&'E

    15;00 h

    .19;30 h

    'ta=eholder Mana!ement

    /$rinciples and tools

    -ollo#.up o sta=eholder

    meetin!s

    EAercises on participator* tools

    and methods Delection o

    !roup interaction processes

    'ummar* and -eedbac= Trainin!

    evaluation

    20;00 h1

    .

    21;00 h

    )ommunication Theor* and

    Models /1; .ears model /-

    'chul" von Thun, -eedbac=

    techni?ues

    )ommunication Theor* and

    Models /2; Transaction &nal*sis

    /E +erne

    )ommunication Theor* and

    Models /3; Neuro.Fin!uistic

    $ro!rammin! /D +andler J >

    %rinder

    -are#ell dinner

    "igure : #genda of the training of trainers course

    3.2 Training post evaluation

    The trainer at the end of the course commented regarding on the outcomes:

    !"he participants of the training course ha#e ac$uired the basic skills and techni$ues of group facilitation

    and stakeholder management% "hey are now able to start implementing a participatory process within theirC&S'% (owe#er, it is recommended that further ad#anced training is offered to the participants in order to

    support the related learning and self)reflection process% & way of deli#ering this ad#anced training could be

    to use the next C&S'S meeting for training of facilitators *on the ground+ in the application of selected

    participatory methods% In this context, it would be necessary to foresee some time before and after the

    C&S'S meeting for training of facilitators% "his training should be targeted to the participants who attended

    the first training% ther Pegaso meetings could be later used for the same purpose%

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    7/22

    9

    $articipants, also at the end o the ourth da* o trainin! #ere as=ed to evaluate the Trainin! or trainers

    course In particular the* #ere as=ed to evaluate the course in relation to; a the topics considered, b the

    methodolo!* adopted, c the documents provided as #ell as d the trainer -rom the results o the

    evaluation /table it is clear that participants have appreciated the hi!hl* participative nature o the

    trainin!, the use o dierent =ind o learnin! methods and in particular the learnin! b* doin! approach used

    b* the trainer (n the other hand the* su!!ested havin! more case studies eAamples as #ell as reerences

    and additional readin!s The trainer thereore !ave his availabilit* to ans#ers to doubts and to !ivesu!!estions on material and reerences to all the participants b* mails -urthermore, participants as=ed or

    urther support in the implementation o participation strate!* in their )&'Es

    $hat %as good& $hat could ha'e been better&

    Topics

    ontents

    Foved itK ense enou!h or 1 #ee= . :ell or!anised a!enda .

    $ractical tips . :e learned about all aspects . It #as !reat, but I thin=

    it #ould be better to !ive case studies just or more practice .

    )ontents are enou!h or the aim o the trainin!

    Gome#or= evaluation . &dd some eAamples about

    real eAamples or ne!otiation . 3.E!o 'tates could

    be part o the obli!ator* session . Invite some

    sta=eholders or end users )&'E speciic

    $hat %as good& $hat could ha'e been better&

    Training ethodology

    Methodolo!* made b* ver* !ood specialists . EAercises . Involvin!

    assistance C Innovation . -ocussin! on learnin! b* doin! instead o

    ppt . Ver* !ood alternation o theor* #ith practical eAercises .

    &ccurate methodolo!* . Ver* eective . Ver* eicient ener!isers .

    $articipator* enou!hK . Ver* !ood, interestin! J creative . Video

    recordin! . %ood s#itchin! bet#een theor* and practice . &ctuall* I

    li=e the time span bet#een sessions and repeatin! #hat #e did

    learn plus spreadin! the sheets on the #alls

    More eAercises . +etter preparation or eAercises .

    Meal, coee, #ine L ield trip . More eAamples .

    EAplainin! the behaviours . Dealit* in the )&'E'

    More no o da*s .

    $hat %as good& $hat could ha'e been better&

    Docu*ents

    Inormative enou!hK . etailed inormation . More than enou!h . More materials #ould be !reat . It is better i #ehave some theoretical ino on discs /bi! material .

    More su!!estions . More case studies . & lot o

    practical eAamples . Deerences . $revious

    eAperience rom other !roups . More biblio!raph*

    . It #ould be better i ever* da* session has a

    separate presentation J the ppt should have some

    i!ures, photos, animations . more practical

    eAamples

    $hat %as good& $hat could ha'e been better&

    Trainer

    EAcellent, patient, active listenin! and respect or all participants .$atient enou!hK . ou did ver* #ell C just =eep it . $roessional J

    optimist attitude . $roessional trainer . Used the participator*

    methods C EAcellentK . Trainer is super C $eda!o!ic C 'upportive .

    Than= *ou /eApressed in &rabic lan!ua!e

    (nl* available durin! our holida* . NeAt timeplease; 1 ree aternoon . %ood is the enem* o the

    better. More .mas )oo=iesK

    Table 2: Post e'aluation of the training of trainers

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    8/22

    6

    5. SD

    $E%&'(Os escription o :or= document introduces the relevance and responsibilit* or the

    implementation o a 'patial ata Inrastructure /'I The tas= consists in the development and

    implementation o participantsO !eonodes or the $E%&'(Os 'I In order to build a !eonode in each

    or!ani"ation, the 'I course aimed at the development o capacities at a basic level or partners involved in

    the project to achieve the complete implementation o their !eonodes The provision o the E.learnin!based course #as a irst step in the capacit* buildin! plan in :$3 #hich #as completed in the handOs on

    practical course in (ostende in (ctober 2012 The trainin! tar!eted $e!aso partners, especiall* those

    involved in !eonode development /)&'Es The trainin! methodolo!* consisted o a e.learnin! trainin!

    course throu!h a model platorm and a handOs on practical course In both trainin!s, ppt, eAamples and

    practical eAercises #ere provided The trainin! covered the topics o 'I, !eoportal, interoperabilit* and

    #eb services The lead trainer and or!ani"er #ere VFI, U$( and U&+

    5.2 Training program

    Session Day 1 (Introduction) Day 2 (onfiguring partner+s

    en'iron*ent)

    Day 3 (,sing data fro* different

    SDI-s for your o%n GIS

    application Group facilitation)

    Day (reating a *etadata and

    creating a geoportal)

    08;00 h .

    11;00 h

    :hat is a 'I /components,

    beneits and challen!es

    Introduction to %eoNet#or=

    )atalo!ue and )':; Installin! an

    adapted version /to $E%&'( o

    the %eoNet#or= sot#are

    Usin! data rom dierent 'IPs

    or *our o#n %I' application

    Metadata and the creation o

    Metadata records Introduction

    to metadata Usin! the

    %eonet#or= orm J the IN'$IDE

    #eb -orm, )reatin! 'ervices

    Metadata

    11;00 h .

    12;00 h

    The $E%&'( 'I; the #h*,

    ho#, #hat and demonstration

    Introduction to %eo'erver, :M'

    and :-' Installin! %eoserverand activatin! :M', :-' and

    other services /until 13;00

    %uidelines or publication and

    data harmoni"ation $E%&'(Psdata harmoni"ation; deinition

    o st*les, s*mbols and scales

    13;30 h .

    1;30 h

    'IQs basic 'ervices and

    unctionalities; iscover*,

    Vie#, o#nload, $rocessin!

    $ractical eAercises 'patial

    indicators or I)M in the

    Mediterranean usin! %eoserver

    J %eonet#or= ; $ublishin! data

    to a :M', 't*lin! portra*als,

    transormin! data, do#nloadin!

    data usin! :-' /rom 1;00

    $ractical eAercise ata

    harmoni"ation o selected

    spatial indicators or I)M in the

    Mediterranean EAercises on

    participator* tools and methods

    Delection o !roup interaction

    processes

    )reation a %eoportal Internet;

    Desources or creatin! :eb

    pa!es, Installin! the $e!aso

    %eoportal /until 14;00

    1;30 h .

    19;00 h

    Use case o 'IQs ocusin! on

    the unctionalities, basic

    technolo!ies and standards

    used /I'( standards, (%)'tandards, IN'$IDE

    The Enviro%rids 'I

    The I)&N 'Ithe International)oastal &tlas Net#or=

    $ractical eAercise; eAercise,

    creatin! a :eb pa!e or hostin!

    a local 'I

    Table 3: SDI hand.s on practical course progra*

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    9/22

    8

    5.3 !no"ledge evaluation

    /ele'ance and the ai*s of the SDI

    $articipants #ere as=ed to ill in a pre and a post evaluation ?uestionnaire o the trainin! +elo# are

    presented the results o both ?uestionnaires

    Most o $E%&'( trainin! participants reco!ni"ed, beore and ater the course, the need o a 'I trainin!

    /?uestion 1 and ?uestion 2; sharin! !eospatial inormation amon! the consortium throu!h a !lobalinrastructure is considered ater the course an important issue or 10 out o 11 participants

    Ruestion and Ruestion 4 attest the =no#led!e re!ardin! the meanin! o 'I !eneral deinitions

    $articipants have sho#n to have a robust =no#led!e re!ardin! it even beore the course

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    10/22

    10

    In more advanced ?uestions, #hile there #ere no doubts in reco!ni"in! the service net#or= as one o the

    main components o a 'I, participants started acin! some doubts, both beore and ater the course

    Go#ever, the majorit* demonstrated to be a#are o the main !oal o 'I, to reco!ni"e the need to use a

    %I' to create them, and to have =no#led!e about the problems o compatibilit* o data (nl* one

    participant in the posted evaluation chan!ed his opinion about the 2nd and th ans#ers o the ?uestion 3

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    11/22

    11

    SDI Technical characteristics

    The datums to be used in $E%&'( /Ruestion 5 and the meanin! o interoperabilit* /Ruestion 9, put in

    trouble man* participants beore the trainin! &lmost hal o the participants missed the ?uestion about

    datums, but the course clariied the points :)', :-', :M', %eonet#or= and %eoserver issues, have been

    the tric=iest o the course The trainin! onl* partiall* succeed in improvin! their =no#led!e I :)' #as

    almost =no#n b* ever*one /eAcept or t#o participants #hich did not chan!ed their ans#er, :-' and

    :M' concepts #ere ?uite unclear but the trainin! helped the majorit* o participant to clari* these issues

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    12/22

    12

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    13/22

    13

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    14/22

    1

    The I0SPI/1 directi'e

    This section anal*ses the ?uestions re!ardin! the =no#led!e about the IN'$IDE directive The results o the

    evaluation sho#s that some o the aims o the IN'$IDE directive persists to be unclear or most o the

    participants /Ruestion 12 Ruestion 13 on the other hand, sho#s that some aims o the irective #ere

    more clear to the participants The third and last ?uestion re!ardin! t*pes and services o the IN'$IDE

    directive #as ans#ered correctl* b* the majorit* o the participants /#ith an improvements o t#o ri!ht

    ans#ers ater the course

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    15/22

    14

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    16/22

    15

    !ar*oni2ation Process

    &lso beore the course, the majorit* o participants =ne# #hat an harmoni"ation process is, reco!ni"ed theneed o it in the conteAt o $E%&'(, and reco!ni"ed the elements #hich need to be harmoni"ed #ithin the

    project Go#ever, the course #as not able to improve the a#areness o these concepts amon! all the

    participants /e! i beore the course onl* t#o participants considered common data model unnecessar*,

    ater the course the* #ere our

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    17/22

    19

    +elo# the results o the open ?uestions included in the $DE and $ost Evaluations are presented

    Ruestion 20;

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    18/22

    16

    5.# Training post evaluation

    General assess*ent of the course

    The ?uestions re!ardin! the !eneral assessment o the GandPs on Trainin! sho# a !eneral satisaction o

    the participants /see table belo#

    !o% you %ill apply %hat you learned&

    The majorit* o the participants reported their #illin!ness to implement a 'I or to use the inormationreceived to improve the eAistin! ones

    3'erall rating and final co**ents

    $articipants #ere inall* as=ed to eApress their opinion on the course b* usin! a scale rom 1 /poor to 4

    /eAcellent, the belo# table reports the mean or each cate!or* T#o participants moreover reported the

    ollo#in! advices in order to improve the trainin! In detail;

    !Better define the target public-participants and the minimum knowledge re$uired to follow the

    course in order to better understand and follow the training%

    !.ess attention on the installation process because trainers are not likely to be the ones to install the

    software, but to create data and fill the ser#ers%

    Mean

    Trainers ratin! ,2

    Trainers methods ,

    (verall ratin! ,5

    41S 03

    :as the content appropriateS 8 1

    :as the introduction inormativeS 10 0

    id *ou understand the contentS 8 1

    &ppropriate level o diicult* 6 1

    o *ou thin= is easible to reproduce this at *our instituteS 5 2

    :as the time and len!th o the trainin! appropriateS 6 1

    :ere the trainin! acilities appropriateS 8 1

    o *ou recommend this venue or other trainin!s 8 0

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    19/22

    18

    $ %ed&pen

    $.1 Training ob'ectives

    The trainin! aimed at improvin! capacities or coastal mana!ement, #hich #ill subse?uentl* acilitate

    sustainable coastal development in the Mediterranean@ and to !et ac?uainted #ith the I)M in !eneral but

    in more detail #ith the I)M $rocess bein! crucial or the implementation o pilot projects in the $E%&'()&'E' The trainin! #as entirel* carried out online, participants at the end o the course #ere as=ed to

    eApress their evaluation

    Target Group:

    8 $E%&'( )&'E' partners

    5earning )ethods: -orum discussions@ 'imulation %ame participation@ and -inal Essa*s preparation

    Preparatory $or6: -inancin! o the )ourse /bud!et@ &nnouncement o the )ourse@ ToDs or lecturers@ ToD

    or the #ebsite providin! a!enc*@ Update o the previous Med(pen version@ )ommunication #ith B

    Instructions to the #ebsite providin! a!enc*@ 'election o candidates@ Ino B Instructions to candidates and

    lecturers prior to the )ourse

    Training Duration:1 Ma* C 3 'eptember 2012

    5ead trainer:Mr ves Genoc?ue

    $.2 Training program

    'ustainable development issues in the Mediterranean

    Go# to respondS

    +asic principles o I)M

    The beneits o I)M

    :ho is responsible or I)MS Fe!islative and inancial rame#or=

    EAamples o introducin! I)M at the national level

    I)M $rocess; Go# to prepare and implement I)M projectsS

    Tool boA

    %ood practices demonstrations

    The $rotocol on I)M in the Mediterranean

    )onclusions and ideas or uture

    $.3 Training post evaluation41S 03

    :as the content appropriateS 8 0

    id *ou understand the contentS 8 0

    :as the trainin! material relevant to *our needsS 9 2

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    20/22

    20

    Ruestion 1;

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    21/22

    21

    Training ad*inistration:as the time and len!th o the trainin! appropriateS 9 Mes C 2 No

    'erall /ating

    )ean

    :hat is *our overall ratin! o the trainin!S 3,3

  • 8/13/2019 I.D 6.1.10 Post Evaluation Training

    22/22

    22

    ( Conclusion

    The trainin! courses or!ani"ed b* $E%&'( #ere appreciated b* the participants Moreover, valuable

    su!!estions have been reported in order to improve uture trainin!s 'ummari"ed belo# are the main

    su!!estions or each course

    De!ardin! the Trainin! o trainersP course, the participants demonstrated appreciation both or the trainers

    and the methodolo!* adopted In order to improve it the* su!!ested havin! more practical eAamples

    /)&'Es related -urthermore, both the trainers and the participants su!!ested havin! an advance trainin!

    in the uture The 'I trainin! #as also appreciated b* the participants #hich demonstrated their

    #illin!ness in usin! the inormation obtained and the competencies ac?uired in order to set up or improve

    'I in their institution Go#ever, the* su!!est to deine better the tar!et public in order to smooth the

    eAecution o the practical eAercises The Med(pen course #as appreciated b* the participants, and it #as

    su!!ested to have more eAamples and literature reerrin! to the )&'Es conteAt /e! eAperiences o I)M in

    the +lac= 'ea

    (verall all the courses or!ani"ed #ithin the rame#or= o the $e!aso )apacit* +uildin! #ere appreciated b*

    the participants and have improved the =no#led!e o I)M and the tools that can support its

    implementation