ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    1/16

    3rd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION

    TECHNOLOGIES: FROM THEORY TO APPLICATIONS

    April 7-11, 2008

    Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria

    February 24, 2015 1

    Christophe Feltus

    Public Research Centre Henri Tudor,

    29, Rue John F. Kennedy

    L-1855 Luxembourg 

    [email protected]

    From Policy Literature Review

    toward Responsibility Concept

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    2/16

    February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 2

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    3/16

    February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 3

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    4/16

    February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 4

    Objectives of the paper 

    Constat: many representations of policy.

    What policy targets : Role, Capability (Access Right), Obligations.

    What policy doesn’t target : Commitment.

    SIM Project, define policy based on business requirements.

    Paper objective : Review de litterature

    toward a innovative model

    T  e c h n i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    O   p e r  a t  i  o n a l  l  e v  e l  

    T  a c t  i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    S  t  r  a t  e  g i  c l  e v  e l  

      E. g .  i n

      t  h e   I  T

      d o m a

     i n :

     a p p  l i c

     a t i o n

     s,  c o m

     p o n e n

     t s, …  P r o

     c e d u r e

     s  B

     u s i n e s

     s

     p r o c e s s e s

      B u s i n e

     s s

     v a  l u e

    Objectives

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Standard view of 

    organizational layers

    Concepts

    and artifacts of 

    organizational layers

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    T  e c h n i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    O   p e r  a t  i  o n a l  l  e v  e l  

    T  a c t  i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    S  t  r  a t  e  g i  c l  e v  e l  

      E. g .  i n

      t  h e   I  T

      d o m a

     i n :

     a p p  l i c

     a t i o n

     s,  c o m

     p o n e n

     t s, …  P r o

     c e d u r e

     s  B

     u s i n e s

     s

     p r o c e s s e s

      B u s i n e

     s s

     v a  l u e

    T  e c h n i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    O   p e r  a t  i  o n a l  l  e v  e l  

    T  a c t  i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    S  t  r  a t  e  g i  c l  e v  e l  

    T  e c h n i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    O   p e r  a t  i  o n a l  l  e v  e l  

    T  a c t  i  c a l  l  e v  e l  

    S  t  r  a t  e  g i  c l  e v  e l  

      E. g .  i n

      t  h e   I  T

      d o m a

     i n :

     a p p  l i c

     a t i o n

     s,  c o m

     p o n e n

     t s, …  P r o

     c e d u r e

     s  B

     u s i n e s

     s

     p r o c e s s e s

      B u s i n e

     s s

     v a  l u e

      E. g .  i n

      t  h e   I  T

      d o m a

     i n :

     a p p  l i c

     a t i o n

     s,  c o m

     p o n e n

     t s, …  P r o

     c e d u r e

     s  B

     u s i n e s

     s

     p r o c e s s e s

      B u s i n e

     s s

     v a  l u e

    Objectives

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Standard view of 

    organizational layers

    Concepts

    and artifacts of 

    organizational layers

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

    Goals

    Indicators

    StrategiesPolicies

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    5/16

    February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 5

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    6/16

    February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 6

    Camerer’s observations

    There are at least three symptoms of the disease causing thequeasy dissatisfaction with policy research:

    (1) Concepts are often ambiguous and their definitions are not 

    agreed upon;

    (2) Checklists or theories are rarely tested, and never tested 

    directly against competing theories and 

    (3) Theories do not ‘cumulate’ or built upon previous theories as

    they should.

    These three deficiencies are a result of the way policy research

    is typically done.

    Warning :

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    7/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 7

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    8/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 8

    Model of responsibility

    · Capability: which describes the quality of having the requisite qualities or accessesto resources to achieve a task;

    · Accountability: which describes the state of being answerable about the

    achievement of a task;

    Commitment: which is the engagement of a stakeholder to fulfil a task and the

    assurance he will do it.

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    9/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 9

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    10/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 10

    Review of AC model

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    11/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 11

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    12/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 12

    Review of Engineering methods

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    13/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 13

    Outline

    Objective of the paper 

    Camerer’s observations over research performed in thefield of policy

    Model of responsibility

    Review of AC model

    Review of Engineering methods

    Conclusion and Future works

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    14/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 14

    Conclusions and Future works

    Objective : Verifying the organizational structure and detecting policy

    problems and inconsistency

    We have review the literature to propose a new responsibility model that

    addresses the Commitment.

    Next step : towards a formal representation. User vs. enterprise responsibility

    Violable vs. inviolable constraints

    Deontic vs. predicate logic ?

    Camerer’s warning has been taken into account

    Responsibility’s concept linked to organizational processes

    Development of a prototype

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    15/16February 24, 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11, 2008 - Umayyad Palace, Damascus, Syria 15

    References

  • 8/16/2019 ICTTA08 SIM Litterature Review v1.0

    16/16

     André Rifaut, Christophe Feltus, Improving Operational Risk Management Systems by Formalizing the Basel IIRegulation with Goal Models and the ISO/IEC 15504 Approach, Regulations Modelling and their Validation &

    Verification (REMO2V’2006), an International Workshop of the 18th Conference on Advanced Information

    Systems Engineering (CAISE2006), pp. 831-837, 2006, Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.

    Christophe Feltus, André Rifaut, An Ontology for Requirements Analysis of Managers’ Policies in Financial

    Institutions, Interoperability for Enterprise & Software Applications (I-ESA2007), 2007, Madeira, Portugal.

    Christophe Feltus, Michaël Petit, Georges Ataya, Definition and Validation of a Business IT Alignment Method

    for Enterprise Governance Improvement in the Context of Processes Based Organizations, 2008 Corporate

    Governance of IT International Conference, 1-2/12/2008,Wellington, New Zealand. Ed. Dr Brian Cusack, ISBN

    978-1-877314-73-5.

     André Rifaut, Christophe Feltus, Improving Operational Risk Management Systems by Formalizing the Basel II

    Regulation with Goal Models and the ISO/IEC 15504 Approach, Regulations Modelling and their Validation &

    Verification (REMO2V’2006), an International Workshop of the 18th Conference on Advanced Information

    Systems Engineering (CAISE2006), pp. 831-837, 2006, Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.

    Christophe Feltus, André Rifaut, An Ontology for Requirements Analysis of Managers’ Policies in Financial

    Institutions, Interoperability for Enterprise & Software Applications (I-ESA2007), 2007, Madeira, Portugal.

    Christophe Feltus, Michaël Petit, Georges Ataya, Definition and Validation of a Business IT Alignment Method

    for Enterprise Governance Improvement in the Context of Processes Based Organizations, 2008 CorporateGovernance of IT International Conference, 1-2/12/2008,Wellington, New Zealand. Ed. Dr Brian Cusack, ISBN

    978-1-877314-73-5.

    C. Feltus, M. Petit, and M. Sloman, Enhancement of Business IT Alignment by Including Responsibility

    Components in RBAC, 5 th Busital workshop, 2010, Hammamet, Tunisia.

    February 24 2015 ICTTA’08 - April 7-11 2008 - Umayyad Palace Damascus Syria 16