Upload
rodger-sparks
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ICT TRAINING PROGRAMMEICT CONTRACT SCHEDULES
Ask not what your lawyer can do for you, but rather what you can do for your lawyer! © Mark Eustace
Mark Vipan and JP Buckley
6 September 2011
2
Why everything matters
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a word are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is that the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can still raed it wouthit a porbelm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istelf, but the word as a wlohe.
3
What we need to avoid
Interpretation issues
leading to disputes
and possible legal action
or costly negotiation
and, potentially, the loss of our desired outcome
4
How to deliver contract requirements
Framework Procurements
BespokeProcurements
guardian.co.uk
5
Framework procurements
When setting up, consider:
who the customers will be
what the range of services is
Procuring authority then enters into framework agreements with the Companies
The entitled customers can take supplies as and when they need them, if at all
Duration of frameworks limited to 4 years
Technology Partner - single supplier framework
Catalist / Buying Solutions - multi-supplier frameworks
PROCURING AUTHORITY
A B C D E F
COMPANY (3)COMPANY (1) COMPANY (2)
FrameworkAgreement
FrameworkAgreement
CallOffs
CallOffs
CallOffs
Customers
6
Bespoke procurements
Consider at the beginning:
the scope of services
any additional service users
Contract will be tailored to the exact requirements of the parties
Can only be limited "additional" services capable of being ordered, or this then becomes a framework with the constraints imposed
AUTHORITY
COMPANY
7
Transition Visualisation
Down select
x weeks
ITPD/ITT/
ITN
10 days
Evaluation
ITSFT/ITT
RESPONSE
Standstill period
Contract Award
decision
Clarifications
37 days
OJEU
PQQ
Contract Award
Procurement ExerciseDD Exit Plan
Business case & prep Transition Transform
-ation
6 - 9 months4 - 9 months 6 months = 24 months
Legacy Contract Replacement Contract
Service cut over / legacy contract expiry
8
Second Generation Outsourcing
time for planning and preparation of business case
preparation for bidder due diligence is there an exit plan?
what is the legacy supplier committed to do?
procurement exercise - choice of the right procedure what is a "particularly complex contract"?
transition and/or transformation
contract extension Pressetext
effect of Remedies Directive
conduct of the transition verification & testing
9
Implementation Plan
Clause 3 and Schedule 6.1
Setting out Nature, Purpose, Format and Production of Plan
Suggested Format
Link back to Contractor Solution, Authority Responsibilities, Testing, Charges
Milestone Deliverables (bulleted list showing all Deliverables (and associated tasks) required for each Milestone)
Duration (working days)
Milestone Date
Authority Responsibilities (if applicable)
Link to ATP/CPP
DC1 operational datacentre
20 06/09/11 facilitating access
n/a
ATP1 achievement of all preceding milestones
0 06/10/11 ATP
CPP1 achievement of CPP criteria
90 06/01/12 CPP
10
Implementation Plan
From Outline Plan to Detailed Plan
To be produced within timescale in Outline Plan
To contain the completion of each design document the completion of the build phase the completion of testing of the Services in accordance with schedule
6.2 (Testing Procedures) training and roll-out activities
To set out detail for at least next 12 months and to be updated weekly once approved
Interaction with Change Control and Provisions on Delay
Impact of due diligence
11
SOR - Statement of Requirements
Clarity is essential
The SOR should include clear, objective and measureable requirements, avoiding ambiguous or open-ended drafting
Common mistakes include terms such as "the Authority may carry out this function", "in the future" or "subject to change"
A Bad Example:
"The Contractor should provide to the test facilitator the requested information relating to test plans, test documents, and common re-usable tools that the Authority may wish to re-use in the future."
12
Testing
What testing is needed?
When will testing take place?
Which tests are needed for particular milestones?
What is the process for approving milestones?
What are the Test Success Criteria?
What is the remediation process for missed / failed milestones?
fugenxcdc.com
13
Testing
Testing - Clause 4 and Schedule 6.2
Purpose = ensure that the Services or any Deliverables are compliant with the Test Success Criteria set out in schedule 6.2 (Testing Procedures)
Once a relevant part of the Services, or a Deliverable, is completed the Contractor shall submit this for Testing and the Testing Procedures are to be adhered to
Schedule sets out the roles and responsibilities
14
Testing
Contractor
Ensures that any items submitted for Testing are quality controlled per the Test Strategy
Manages progress of the Testing in accordance with:
Test Strategy Test Plan Test Specification
Provides the Authority with a draft Test Report in good time before the date on which any Tests are to end
Submits a final Test Report following completion of the Testing
15
Testing
Test Issue
Where an issue is identified during Testing, including where any relevant Test Success Criteria are not met
Test Issue Levels are allocated by the Contractor and are approved by the Authority
Test Issue Level = the severity of the Test Issue (see over)
16
Testing
Test Issue Level
To be set for each project and to be contained in para 9.1 of Schedule 6.2
Example
Test Issue Severity Level 1 prevents a critical element of the relevant Services and/or the relevant Deliverables from functioning or being performed;
Test Issue Severity Level 2 all elements of the relevant Services and the relevant Deliverables can still function with a workaround, however functionality or performance is severely or materially impacted;
Test Issue Severity Level 3 all elements of the relevant Services and the relevant Deliverables can still function, however there is minor functionality/performance impact; and
Test Issue Severity Level 4 all elements of the relevant Services and the relevant Deliverables can still function, however there are minor cosmetic defects with no functional impact and with no impact on end users.
17
Testing
Test Success Criteria are met: Authority issues Test Certificate or a Milestone Achievement Certificate
where appropriate
Each party bears its own costs in relation to the Testing
Test Success Criteria are not met (in whole or in part): Default position - Test Certificate need not be granted. Contractor to re-
test if time. If not, Delay provisions (Clauses 5-8) apply
If Test Certificate is granted, then Correction Plan should be annexed
If a Milestone Achievement Certificate is granted, then Milestone Payment is to be made
Example of alternative drafting: Where no Test Issue Levels 1 or 2 are outstanding, and no more than the
[agreed number] of Test Issue Level 3 are outstanding, the Authority will issue a Conditional Test Certificate/Conditional Milestone Achievement Certificate but may withhold payment of any Milestone Payment pending resolution of the issue.
18
Testing - Schematic
Completion of Services or a Deliverable
Tests
Test Success Criteria are not met. The Delay provisions in clauses 5 – 8 will apply as appropriate.
Test Success Criteria are met / Deliverable meets spec
Authority issues a Test Certificate or a
Milestone Achievement
Certificate
Failure to Achieve Test
Success Criteria
Contractor is responsible
for Authority’s costs (if
Milestone missed)
Re-Testing required
Caused by Contractor
Caused by Authority
Contractor due compensation. Contractor provides Authority with information required to
assess validity of claim.
Each Party bears own costs.
Agreed. Authority pays.
Not agreed = Dispute Resolution
Process.
COSTS:
19
Liability limits
Must be precise and accurate
A misplaced comma could cost millions:
Example 1:
The supplier shall not in any event be liable for any indirect, special or consequential loss, howsoever arising (including but not limited to loss of anticipated profits)
Example 2:
The supplier shall not in any event be liable for any loss of anticipated profit or for any indirect, special or consequential loss, howsoever arising
http://legalbizzle.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/revolting-pedants/
How can you help? Understand your organisation's appetite for risk and typical liability levels.
Consider carefully what the different caps cover.
Consider what damage a supplier's breach could cause to property, data, other contracts.
20
Service levels
Consider what will be measured. Is it practicable?
How will we reach an appropriate percentage?
What exclusions are there?
How will compliance be monitored and managed during the life of the contract?
What happens if service levels are not met?
Persistent/repeat failures?
Termination right?
Escalating Service Credits?
How can I help?
understanding the impact of breach
modelling how service credits are appliedschuelerautomotive.com
21
Standards
Basic standards already included
What else do we need to include?
The sooner you let us know, the better
That way bidders can be informed and understand their risk profile and the compliance regimes they need to have in place
22
Charges
What payment profile is likely to be acceptable?
When will charges commence?
How will they accrue, even if not paid?
What if implementation is late?
Finance costs?
Indexation?
date of application?
in respect of which periods?
which index is used?
loanmortgagecredit.com
23
Open Book Accounting
Before contract awarded, Contractor submits financial model
budgeted items for initial set up
ongoing service delivery costs
assumed profitability
Contractor provides annual accounts in relation to services
Accounts show contractor's actual costs and profits
May lead to reset of charges if actuals are less than budget
Supports gain sharing
Forms the basis for estimating change costs under Change Control Procedure
Ensures ability to monitor financial aspects of the project
24
Benchmarking
What is Benchmarking?
Service performance and/or the price of services under the Agreement are compared to the market
Benchmarking can apply to Services as a whole or to individual service elements (e.g. printing, hosting)
Why is it used?
Keeps continuous competitive pressure on the Contractor to provide value for money
Where expectation that prices will drop over lifetime of contract
25
Benchmarking
Appointment of a Benchmarker
By either the Authority or the parties together
How will the Benchmarker be chosen? i.e. demonstrated expertise, methodology, data sources etc, from a list, or simply not a competitor.
Benchmarker to act as an expert not an arbiter
Who will pay the fees?
26
Benchmarking
Benchmarking considerations:
Scope i.e price, quality, service levels etc
Constraints on the Benchmarker
When will benchmarking take place over the term? - generally not in early years or for short term contract
How will the Benchmarker identify analogies for the Services? - need to identify like for like comparators. Can be difficult for "newer" deals
How will the results be implemented? - i.e. what are the "sanctions"
What happens in the event of a dispute? Right of appeal/second opinion?
27
Benchmarking
Benchmarking will operate using some of the following:
information from other service providers to the Authority
survey information
market intelligence
the Benchmarker's own data and experience
relevant published information
information from consultancies and/ or other vendors or purchasers of Comparable Services
information from 'in-house' providers to the Authority to the extent that Benchmarker considers that they are valid comparators
Improvements or price reductions must be implemented within a specified period of time
28
Benchmarking
Benchmarker to have regard to:
the contractual and business environment under which the Services are being provided [(including the scope, scale, complexity and geographical spread of the Services)]
any front-end investment and development costs of the Contractor
the Contractor's risk profile including the financial, performance or liability risks associated with the provision of the Services as a whole
the extent of the Contractor's management and contract governance responsibilities
any other factors reasonably identified by the Contractor, which, if not taken into consideration, could unfairly cause the Contractor's pricing to appear non-competitive (such as erroneous costing or over-aggressive pricing)
29
Gain Share
Applicable where operation of the Agreement results in higher gains than those predicted
Imposes limits on the return the Contractor is able to achieve
Contractor and the Authority share in
returns made over the life of the project
returns on a periodic basis over a certain threshold
returns over a rolling fixed period
Returns may be as a rebate for service charges or "free" additional services
Requires Open Book Accounting to verify the gain to be shared
30
Gain Share
Part A of Schedule 7.3 contains a templateBand Earned Gain Contractor Share Authority Share
Band 1 Less than or equal to Threshold Gain Margin
N/A N/A
Band 2 [More than the Threshold Gain Margin and less than or equal to the Threshold Gain Margin plus [ ].00%]
x% 100%-x%
Band 3 [More than the Threshold Gain Margin plus [ ].00% and less than or equal to the Threshold Gain Margin plus [ ].00%]
X% - [ ]% [ ]% +X%
Band 4 [More than the Threshold Gain Margin plus [ ].00%]
X% - [ ]% [ ]% +X%
31
Execution
Need to be accurate
All documents need to be completed correctly
Party names and signatures need to be correct (and check the contractor is the qualified bidder and the PQQ response is still current)
Glencore - Chief Executive signs contract asking him to report to a company that doesn't exist
Remember to obtain a Guarantee if the bidder pre-qualified on that basis
Obtain opinion letters regarding foreign entities, especially guarantors
How you can help
Advise of any required approvals/delegated authority.
Ensure signatories are briefed and available.
Advise of any other internal / departmental procedures
32
Contract Management
monitoring of contractual responsibilities
use of governance meetings
escalation processes
element of "bargaining" - areas of non-compliance traded for new/amended requirements (NB Pressetext)
applying contractual remedies where appropriate
dispute resolution
ICT TRAINING PROGRAMMEICT CONTRACT SCHEDULES
Ask not what your lawyer can do for you, but rather what you can do for your lawyer! © Mark Eustace
Mark Vipan and JP Buckley
6 September 2011