ICRMP Project Completion Reportfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files... · SPPT Sub-Project Proposal Team SRG Self-Reliant Groups SU Silliman University ... Integrated Coastal

ICRMP Project Completion Report

Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) Project Completion Report

2

Table of Contents

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 9

II. PROJECT PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................. 10

A. Over-all Assessment ................................................................................................ 10

B. Physical Performance .............................................................................................. 10

COMPONENT A: POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING 10

COMPONENT B: ICRM AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 12

COMPONENT C: ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AND INCOME DIVERSIFICATION 16

COMPONENT D: SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES 187

C. Financial Performance ............................................................................................. 19

III. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT .............................................................................. 20

IV. LOAN COVENANT AGREEMENTS .................................................................................... 22

V. PROJECT EVALUATION ....................................................................................................... 22

A. Project Relevance..................................................................................................... 22

B. Project Effectiveness ............................................................................................................ 23

C. Project Efficiency ..................................................................................................... 24

D. Sustainability and Way Forward .............................................................................. 24

E. Impact ........................................................................................................................ 25

F. Lessons Learned ...................................................................................................... 26

G. Recommendations ................................................................................................... 27

List of Tables

Table 1. Outputs based on the Design Monitoring Framework (DMF) ............................................................... 10

Table 2. Breakdown of Mangrove and Watershed Rehabilitation and Reforestation ........................................ 14

Table 3. MPA-based Biodiversity Conservation ................................................................................................. 15

Table 4. List of Corridor-wide Conservation Projects .......................................................................................... 15

Table 5. List of BFAR-led Assisted SRGs .............................................................................................................. 16

Table 6. Ecotourism Sites Assisted ..................................................................................................................... 17

Table 7. List of SESF Sub-projects ....................................................................................................................... 19

Table 8. ICRMP Financial Performance Based on Fund Source ........................................................................... 20

Table 9. Component Implementation Matrix .................................................................................................... 21


3

ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

BMB Biodiversity Management Bureau

BFAR Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

CMMO Coastal and Marine Management Office

DA Department of Agriculture

DBM Department of Budget and Management

DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DoF Department of Finance

DoT Department of Tourism

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EO 533 Executive Order No. 533

FASPO Foreign Assisted and Special Projects Office

GOP Government of the Philippines

GP Grant Proceeds

GSA Guided Self-Assessment

ICM Integrated Coastal Management

ICRMP Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project

IEC Information Education Campaign

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IRR Implementing Rules and Regulations

JAO Joint Administrative Order

LCE Local Chief Executives

LFIS Loan Financial Information Services

LGU Local Government Unit

LP Loan Proceeds

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

MDFO Municipal Development Fund Office

MOA Memorandum of Agreement

MOU Memorandum of Understanding

MPAs Marine Protected Areas

NG National Government

NGAs National Government Agencies

NICMP National Integrated Coastal Management Program

NIPAs National Integrated Protection Areas

NOL No Objection Letter

PAWB Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau

PBIDS Performance Based Incentive/Disincentive System

PCO Project Coordinating Office

PCRA Participatory Coastal Resources Assessment


4

PHE Population Health and Environment

PIS Provincial ICRMP Specialist

PMC Project Management Consultants

PMO Project Management Office

PO People's Organization

PPIU Provincial Project Implementing Unit

PPMS Project Participatory Monitoring System

PSC Project Steering Committee

PWS Potable Water Supply

RIC Regional ICRMP Centers

RMTU Ramon Magsaysay Technological University

RPIU Regional Project Implementing Unit

RSC Regional Steering Committee

RTD Regional Technical Director

SEAFDEC Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center

SPA Sub-Project Financing Agreement

SPPT Sub-Project Proposal Team

SRG Self-Reliant Groups

SU Silliman University

TOR Terms of Reference

TOT Training of Trainors

TWG Technical Working Group

UP MERF University of the Philippines Marine Environment & Resources Foundation


5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) aimed to enhance coastal resources. The specific goals are sustainable management of coastal resources and increased income for coastal communities. The Project promoted the “ridge-to-reef” approach in managing coastal resources for sustainability. ICRMP was a six-year project (June 2007 – June 2013) with a one (1) year extension (July 2013 – June 2014) led by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and implemented jointly with the Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (DA-BFAR) and Department of Finance-Municipal Development Fund Office (DoF-MDFO). The Project cost was US$62.3 Million (PhP2.6 Billion) and had four components namely: (i) Component A: Policy and Institutional Strengthening and Development; (ii) Component B: ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation; (iii) Component C: Enterprise Development and Income Diversification; and (iv) Component D: Social and Environmental Services and Facilities.

Over-all Performance

By end of Project, physical performance was 86.09% and financial performance was 84.44%. This was based on revised cost with the loan cancellation amounting to US$10.25 Million. Physical Performance Component A: Policy and Institutional Strengthening and Development. Under the DENR - Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB) now Biodiversity Management Bureau (BMB), ten (10) policy studies were completed by the Project. Substantial amount of policy consultations and dialogues specifically around the issue of biodiversity conservation, resource rents for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), mangrove and foreshore management, Environmental Hazards, Community-Based Ecotourism, Incentives and Disincentives, Live Reef/Food Fish Trade Policy, and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of ICRM activities, were organized which provided relevant inputs in the completion of the said studies and generation of important policy inputs. The policy recommendations generated from these studies were used as inputs in the draft National ICM Program (NICMP) and in the drafting of necessary department orders and policy issuances in relation to integrated coastal resources management. Also, under the Policy and Institutional Strengthening Component, around 1,715 staff from DENR and DA-BFAR, both at the national and local levels, as well as from the LGUs were provided with various training related to coastal resources management. The Project also developed the ICRM and marine biodiversity research agenda which was used in the prioritization of research projects supported under the ICRMP. Through the Project, 32 researches were undertaken. The ten (10) baseline/research studies were completed by the UP Marine Science Institute (UPMSI) covering Cagayan and Zambales. Eleven (11) studies were done by the Silliman University (SU) covering the provinces of Masbate, Cebu and Davao Oriental. Additional 11 studies were contracted to the Regional ICRMP Centers (RICs) and DENR’s Ecosystems Research and Development Service (ERDS). Annex 3 provides the list of researches and studies conducted. Component B: ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation. Component B, or the ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation, is the core of the ICRMP and constitutes the biggest chunk or share (about 63%) in the overall project budget.


6

Institutionalization of ICRM Practices. The Project has assisted the Local Government Units in the preparation of 79 Integrated Coastal Resources Management (ICRM) Plans and 77 MPA Management Plans. The developed/updated MPA management plans resulted in the allocation of funds for ICRM-related activities by the LGUs. Through the Project’s collaboration, greater involvement of LGUs in developing and managing coastal resources was effected. Establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). In the field of Marine Protected Area Management, 77 MPAs and five (5) MPA Networks have been established and/or strengthened through the ICRMP. As a result of the Project support, 24,908.02 hectares are now under MPA coverage with 5,431.89 hectares declared as no-take zones. The introduction of these measures is hoped to result in the increase of fish catch thereby increasing the income of the fisher folks in the ICRMP regions in the future. Establishment of Regional ICRM Centers (RICs). The Project established five (5) Regional ICRM Centers to become the hubs for biodiversity monitoring and research, training and demonstration. The RICs are located within the following marine science institutions (MSI): (1) Cagayan State University in Region 2; (2) Ramon Magsaysay Technological University in Region 3; (3) Masbate School of Fisheries in Region 5; (4) Cebu Technological University in Region 7; and (5) Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology in Region 11. Two (2) Assisting Institutions (AIs), namely, the University of the Philippines -Marine Science Institute and Silliman University, provided technical and capability building assistance to the MSIs. Institutionalization of M&E Systems. The Project facilitated the institutionalization of ICRM monitoring and evaluation systems to determine the level of LGU performance. One of which is the EcoGovernance Index using the Guided Self Assessment (GSA) tool and the MPA Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool or METT. The ICRMP interventions contributed in improving the GSA scores from 76.15% in CY 2011 to 90.85% in CY 2013. Comparatively, METT rating showed similar increase in trend from 70% in 2012 to 75% in CY 2013. In the establishment of municipal coastal database, the Project collaborated with the Partnerships for Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA) in the installation of the Integrated Information Management System (IIMS). This IIMS, however, needs further enhancement to make it fully adoptable and operational at the LGU and DENR offices. Implementation of Mangrove/Watershed Conservation. This sub-component reforested and rehabilitated 4,354.58 hectares of mangroves and 10,604.88 hectares of watershed areas. However, several very strong typhoons that hit the country in 2012 and 2013 damaged about 2,911.06 hectares of watershed plantations and another 655.77 hectares of mangrove plantations. A total of 360 PO members were able to generate additional income from these reforestation undertakings. Within mangrove conservation areas, nine (9) sites were used as ecotourism destinations offering river expedition (boating) providing livelihood to 341 SRG members. Likewise, within the watershed areas, three (3) sites were also used as forest adventure destinations offering trekking which provided livelihood to 273 SRG members. Implementation of Biodiversity Conservation Projects. Project coursed the conservation activities through the assisted MPAs and MPA networks within marine corridors and ecosystems. About 49 MPA-based conservation projects and three (3) corridor-wide conservation projects were implemented. MPA-based conservation projects included re-stocking of giant clams, abalones, sea cucumbers, sea hares, and other pelagic species. On the other hand, corridor-wide conservation undertaking included humpback whale conservation and turtle conservation. Moreover, there are now ten (10) MPA sites which are being used as ecotourism destinations offering surfing and diving experiences.


7

Component C: Enterprise Development and Income Diversification. The ecotourism enterprise development was undertaken by the DENR’s Biodiversity Management Bureau. This subproject promoted responsible travel with emphasis on experiences with nature through reef discovery (snorkeling and diving), forest adventure (trekking) and river/mangrove expedition (boating). There were twenty-two (22) sites established for ecotourism with 55 enterprises established. The activities provided income for 1,118 SRG members. On the other hand, the DA-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) led the implementation of aquatic and land-based enterprises. At the close of the Project, there were 267 enterprises established, 226 of which were financed through ICRMP funds and 41 enterprises were financed through BFAR regular funds. Aquatic enterprises include tilapia culture, fish processing, mud crab fattening, and sea transport, while land enterprises include duck raising, cattle raising, and hog fattening, among others. There were a total of 11,525 Self Reliant Group (SRG) members, provided with aquatic or land-based enterprises with 5,134 women (44%). As a result of the implementation of these enterprises, SRG initial gross income ranges from P10,000.00 to P30,000.00 per month. Individual SRG member income increment ranges from P500.00 to P2,000.00 per month. Component D: Social and Environmental Services and Facilities. This component addressed the basic social services needs of the disadvantaged coastal communities. The project supported the LGUs’ efforts to mitigate coastal pollution and degradation of resources. The component was implemented with the support of DoF-Municipal Development Fund Office, in the facilitation of the necessary Sub-project Financial Agreements (SFA) as well as the Accession Undertakings (AUs). There were 13 social and environmental services facilities that were completed and are now operational. Loan Covenant Agreements. All agreements in the Loan Covenant with the ADB were complied and satisfied. These include the agreements on ICRMP compliance to ADB social safeguards requirements particularly for affected peoples as well as indigenous peoples. Project also acted on compliance to environmental pre-requisites prior to sub-project SESF construction and implementation. Project Relevance. The project achievements has contributed in the overall government’s efforts on environment and natural resources development as embodied in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP 2011-2016). Project Effectiveness. The Project facilitated the increased LGU allocation of funds for ICM activities. In CY 2011, there were 70 participating LGUs which have passed their respective Resolutions/Ordinances allocating funds for ICRM activities, ranging from P200,000.00 – P 2,000,000.00. Through the aquatic/land based enterprises, the SRGs gained income which ranges from

P10,000 – P30,000 per month. Individual SRG member income increment ranges from P500 – P2,000 per month. Under the ecotourism enterprises, individual SRG member income increment ranges from P500 – P1,500 per month during peak season. The activities relieved pressure on coastal resources, thus preventing their deterioration.


8

Sustainability and Way Forward. DENR through the BMB will pursue the final endorsement by the DENR, DA and DILG on the incentives/disincentives draft orders. The recommendations in the studies are proposed to be pilot tested in selected LGUs wherein results may be used as basis for adoption and replication. Continued Coordination of the DENR RPIUs with all stakeholders and proposed continued conduct of GSA and METT for LGUs.

Impact. There were 14 LGUs which gained experience in the project conceptualization, development, procurement and implementation of foreign-funded projects like ADB. Piloting of RICs. The Project piloted the establishment of Regional ICRM Centers (RIC). The lessons gained from the experience may be useful in the establishment of RICs in other regions.

There were about 25,000 SRG members provided with skills training which now have the opportunity to seek better employment opportunities outside their community.


9

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. The Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) promoted the “ridge-to-reef” approach in managing coastal resources for sustainability. ICRMP was a six-year project (June 2007 – June 2013) with one year extension (July 2013 – June 2014) led by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and implemented jointly with the DA-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) and DoF-Municipal Development Fund Office (MDFO). The Project cost was US$62.3 Million (PhP2.6 Billion) and had four components namely: (i) Component A: Policy and Institutional Strengthening and Development; (ii) Component B: ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation; (iii) Component C: Enterprise Development and Income Diversification; and (iv) Component D: Social and Environmental Services and Facilities.

2. The Project supported the Government’s efforts in addressing the critical issues of sustainable management of marine and coastal resources. The salient activities of the Project included: (i) development of an institutional framework for integrated coastal resources management (ICRM), addressing policy weaknesses and legal gaps, clarifying roles of national government agencies concerned and local governments, and addressing their capacity-building needs; (ii) assessment of resources in the coastal zone of participating municipalities; development and implementation of ICRM plans and participatory law enforcement; (iii) implementation of biodiversity conservation in priority marine biodiversity corridors supported by focused research on critical ecosystems and threatened species; (iv) assistance to municipal fisher folk in the development of sustainable enterprises and livelihoods thereby reducing their reliance on fishing; and (v) improvement of water supply, sanitation, and solid waste management for disadvantaged coastal communities.

3. The Project originally targeted 68 municipalities covering five (5) Regions and the six (6) provinces of Cagayan, Zambales, Masbate, Cebu, Siquijor and Davao Oriental. In CY 2010, the Governor of Romblon requested for the inclusion of Romblon Province. Per DENR assessment of Region 4B Biodiversity Values and Status of Coastal Resource Management (CRM) Initiatives, the Department endorsed the inclusion of Romblon in the list of participating provinces. With the ADB approval of eight (8) Local Government Units (LGUs) in Romblon and four (4) additional LGUs in Cebu and Masbate, the total LGUs increased from 68 to 80. Annex 1A presents the list of ICRMP covered LGUs and Annex 1B shows the selected municipalities exemplifying “ridge to reef” approach to implementation.

4. Basic Data

Loan Number Grant Number

2311-PHI 0071-PHI

Project Title Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP)

Executing Agency Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)

Implementing Agency DENR, DA-Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), DoF-Municipal Development Fund Office (MDFO), Local Government Units (LGUs)

Total Project Cost $ 62.32 Million (original) $ 54.91 Million (revised)

Loan Amount $ 33.8 Million (original) $ 26.39 Million (revised)

Grant Amount $ 9.00 Million

GOP Counterpart $ 8.71 Million

LGU Counterpart $ 10.81 Million

Signing Date March 8, 2007

Effectivity Date June 28, 2007

Original Closing Date June 30 2013

Revised Closing Date June 30, 2014


10

II. PROJECT PERFORMANCE

A. Over-all Assessment 5. An assessment of the completed activities indicated that ICRMP has significantly achieved its expected outputs as shown in Table 1. Physical performance at end of project was computed at 86.09% while financial performance per December 31, 2014 financial report was computed at 84.44%.

Table 1. Outputs based on the Design Monitoring Framework (DMF)

Expected Output Original Revised Result Performance

Component A

Increased stakeholder participation 68 80 79 98.75%

80 LGUs with ICRM budget allocation 68 80 79 98.75%

Component B

LGU score 75% in eco-governance 75% 75% 90.85% 15% > target

In 80 LGUs

50,000 has coral reefs covered 50,000.00 50,000.00 24,908.02 49.82%

5,000 has coral reefs no take zone. 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,431.89 108.64%

9,000 hectares of mangroves assisted 9,000.00 4,476.00 4,354.58 97.29%

7,500 hectares of watershed assisted 7,500.00 10,712.00 10,604.88 99.00%

For no take zones:

30% increase in fish density 30% 30% Not yet determined

5% increase in fish species richness 5% 5% Not yet determined

Component C

340 land/aquatic- enterprises established 340 345 267 77.39%

32 ecotourism enterprises established 32 55 55 100%

60% operational after year 1 operation 226 226 85 37.61%

Land and Aquatic-based Enterprises Ecotourism Enterprises

72 13

6,800 are employed due to livelihoods 6,800 6,800 12,643 185%

30% are women 2,040 2,040 5,506 269%

Component D

HH in 68 LGUs with social facilities 68 15 13 86.67%

B. Physical Performance

COMPONENT A: POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING

6. All the required studies were completed. Substantial amount of policy consultations and dialogues specifically around the issue of biodiversity conservation, resource rents for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), mangrove and foreshore management, Environmental Hazards, Community-Based Ecotourism, Incentives and Disincentives, Live Reef/Food Fish Trade Policy, and Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of ICRM activities, were organized which provided relevant inputs in the completion of the said studies and generation of important policy inputs. The project also provided inputs in the enhancement of ICM framework through the development of the National Integrated Coastal Management Program (NICMP). The studies completed were the following:

(i) The Need for Biodiversity Conservation Policy Study: An Assessment within the Purview of Executive Order 578. The study recommended a more general and inclusive biodiversity policy which may be issued through the Executive Branch and consolidated the relevant provisions scattered in various laws such as NIPAs Act (Republic Act 7586), Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act (Republic Act 9147), National Cave


11

Resources Management and Protection Act (Republic Act 9072) and Fisheries Code (Republic Act 8550).

(ii) Community-Based Strategy in the Implementation of Ecotourism Projects. The study

provided substantial inputs in the finalization of DENR Department Order 2013-19 re: “Guidelines on Ecotourism Planning and Management in Protected Areas.”

(iii) Policy Study on Mangrove Management. The study focused on mangrove related problems and concerns which resulted in the formulation of several department administrative orders (DAO) to address these concerns. These are as follows: (i) Draft JAO: “Guidelines on the Reversion of Abandoned, Undeveloped and Underutilized Fishponds under Fishpond Lease Agreements to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources through the National Convergence Approach”; (ii) Draft DAO: “Classification of Illegally Titled Fishponds and Constructed Fishponds in Classified Forestland and Reclassification of Intact Mangrove Forest in Classified Alienable and Disposable Land”; (iii) Draft DAO: “Special Agreement for Mangrove Area Development as a Legal Instrument for the Development and Management of Mangrove Areas Including Beach Areas and Foreshore Areas under the Administrative Jurisdiction of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources”; (iv) Draft policy recommendation: “Policy Recommendation on the Implementation of Laws and Relevant Administrative Issuances Relating to Foreshore Areas that are actually Mangrove Areas”; (v) Draft DAO: “Policy Recommendation on the Repeal of the Policy Prohibiting the Cutting of Mangrove Forest and in the Collection of Forest Charges therefrom Embodied in RA 7161.”

(iv) The Emerging Challenges of Foreshore Management: A Review of Foreshore-Related

Laws and Policies, Institutional Arrangements and Issues. Many recommendations from the study were incorporated in the draft DAO on Comprehensive Guidelines on Administration and Management of Foreshore Areas developed by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) under the Land Administration Management Project 2 (LAMP 2).

(v) Policy Study on User Fees for Marine Protected Areas and Resource Rents for Major Coastal Habitats. The policy study came up with recommendations to address the constraints in the implementation of DAO 2000-51 and recommendations on user fees for mangroves, coral reefs and foreshore areas within ICRMP sites based on the results of surveys conducted in Cagayan and Masbate involving the primary users of these ecosystems.

(vi) Policy Study on Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. The policy study involved the development of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) tool for the planning and regulation of small scale economic activities (SSEAs) within the coastal zone that have continued to expand and proliferate and threatened the ecological integrity and productivity of coastal habitats and resources.

(vii) Policy Study on Environmental Hazards Management. The vulnerability assessment tool and policy recommendations in this Study are intended to equip the ICRMP stakeholders with supplementary policy-making instruments to rationalize local policies and management strategies—making their ICRM Plans and programs risk adaptive.

(viii) Study on Live Reef/Food Fish Trade Policy. The study gathered the basis for policy reform and this report provided information required on the issues of the stocks and trade. The study also crafted appropriate policy and regulatory strategies for live reef fish food trade.

(ix) Study on Incentives/Disincentives System. The study was conducted to provide recommendations on the best incentive/disincentives to motivate local government units (LGUs) to adopt or to continue doing sound coastal management practices.


12

(x) National Integrated Coastal Resources Management and Marine Biodiversity Research Agenda. The research agenda served as basis for the conduct of 30 research studies under Component B. The ICRMP research agenda provided guidelines in the prioritization of proposals related to coastal and marine environment.

7. Capacity Building. To ensure effective and efficient project implementation, ICRMP conducted trainings for 1,715 staff from the DENR, DA-BFAR and LGUs. Of these, 668 were women participants (39%). They were capacitated and trained in various aspects of ICRM, including but not limited to: (i) coastal management; (ii) watershed management; (iii) sustainable use of mangrove resources; (iv) marine protected area (MPA) organization and networking; (v) biodiversity conservation; (vi) sub-project proposal preparation and evaluation under Component D, among others. 8. Incentives/Disincentives. The Project completed the study on Incentives/ Disincentives system to link coastal resources management certification system in the DILG performance system evaluation for LGUs. The results of the study were presented to the technical working group composed of representatives from DENR, DILG, and DA-BFAR.

COMPONENT B: ICRM AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

9. Strengthening of LGU Capacities. The 80 LGUs were provided with trainings which focused on development planning, governance, project implementation, coastal management, resource management, biodiversity conservation, social facilities’ project development, feasibility study preparation, among others. Through these activities, the Project was able to institutionalize the following ICRM practices:

(i) Participatory Coastal Resources Assessments (PCRAs). There were 80 PCRAs conducted which resulted to 80 coastal environmental profiles.

(ii) Integrated Coastal Resources Management (ICRM) Plans. Of the 80

participating LGUs, 79 ICRM Plans were prepared which were integrated by the LGUs in their respective municipal development plans. The ICRM Plans facilitated the development of LGU-based coastal management framework and implementation strategies. In ensuring that such ICRM LGU activities were funded, the LGUs also issued their respective Sanggunian Bayan (SB) Resolutions and/or Ordinances.

10. Marine Protected Areas (MPA). Of the 77 MPAs, the Project facilitated the establishment of 26 MPAs and strengthening of 51 existing MPAs. The 77 MPA Management Plans were prepared and integrated in their respective ICRM Plans and municipal development plans. As a result of Project support, 24,908.02 hectares are placed under MPA coverage. The Project was not able to achieve the 50,000 hectare target considering that the majority of the MPAs established under the Project are generally small in size. Within the MPA coverage, 5,431.89 hectares are now within the “no-take zones” which exceeded the 5,000 hectare target. Project was able to achieve its “no-take zone” target with the inclusion of the “fish sanctuaries” within the covered LGUs. The establishment of fish sanctuaries were facilitated by BFAR. The introduction of these measures is hoped to result in the increase of fish catch thereby increasing the income of the fisher folks in the ICRMP regions in the future. Moreover, there are now ten (10) MPA sites which are being used as ecotourism destinations offering surfing and diving experiences. Annex 2 provides the list of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).

Map of San Felipe, Zambales MPA


13

11. MPA Networks. MPA Network is the partnership among the municipalities with MPAs for collective conservation, protection and management of marine ecosystems. MPA network activities were initiated through surveys, meetings and cross visits to existing MPA networks. Several workshops were conducted on foundational concepts of MPA networks, coordination procedures and MPA Network planning. Legwork included the creation of legal basis through the issuances of Sanggunian Panlalawigan Resolutions as well as designation of the Ad Hoc Committees and preparation of MPA Network Plans. 12. Linkaging of the MPAs into MPA Networks. The willingness of the different MPAs to group/associate themselves into an MPA Network determined the suitability for networking. Also a factor was the willingness of the Provincial Government to participate in the formation, organization and operation of MPA networks. The provincial government’s participation provided leadership in the operation of MPA networks.

13. As committed, five (5) MPA Networks were established and are as follows:

(i) Region 2, Cagayan MPA Network for the Babuyan Corridor (ii) Region 3, Zambales MPA Network (ZAMPAN) for the Zambales Marine Ecosystem (iii) Region 5, Masbate MPA Network (MAMPAN) for the Ticao Pass (iv) Region 7, South West Cebu Cluster for the Daanbantayan Corridor (v) Region 11, Pacific Seaboard MPA Network of Davao Oriental (PASEMPANDO) for the

Pujada Bay

14. Five (5) Regional ICRM Centers (RICs) were established to serve as hubs for biodiversity monitoring and research, training and demonstration. These are located at existing marine science institutions. ICRMP facilitated the actual construction of RIC buildings complete with necessary equipment and facilities including laboratory, training room and dormitory. The two (2) Assisting Institutions, the University of the Philippines – Marine Science Institute - Marine Environmental and Resources Foundation (UP MSI MERF) and Silliman University, provided the necessary technical and capability building assistance to the following marine science institutions to serve as RICs:

(i) Cagayan State University (CSU), Cagayan (ii) Ramon Magsaysay Technological University, Zambales (iii) Masbate School of Fisheries (MSF), Masbate (iv) Cebu Technological University (CTU), Cebu (v) Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology (DOSCST), Davao Oriental

15. At present, most of the Regional ICRMP Centers are now active in research studies. In fact, with additional support from ICRMP, the RICs were able to complete 8 research studies providing information on the condition of coastal resources and threatened species on selected critical ecosystems. It is also worth mentioning that the CSU in Cagayan, Region 2, has prepared proposals for small grants for possible funding by other institutions. 16. Researches on Critical Biodiversity Resources. A total of 32 studies were completed. The studies were conducted to assess coastal pelagic species and provide bench marking on impacts of climate change. The ten (10) baseline/research studies were contracted out to UP MSI MERF covering Cagayan and Zambales. Eleven (11) studies were contracted to Silliman University (SU) covering provinces of Masbate, Cebu and Davao Oriental. Additional 11 studies were contracted to Regional ICRMP Centers (RICs) and DENR’s Ecosystems Research and Development Service (ERDS). Annex 3 provides the list of researches and studies conducted.


14

17. Monitoring Mechanisms were instituted:

(i) Guided Self Assessment (GSA). The GSA is a participatory process of evaluation of LGUs to identify strengths and gaps in existing ICRM practices. The index reports the indicative LGU level of performance on ICRM related activities with focus on: (i) planning, (ii) budgeting, (iii) implementation; and (iv) law enforcement. The project was able to administer the conduct of the GSA in all participating LGUs. Average GSA in 2011 was pegged at 76.15% while the average GSA rating for 2013 was computed at 90.85%.

(ii) Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). In monitoring Marine

Protected Areas, the Project has adopted the Global Environmental Facility (GEF)-endorsed Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). The METT Score Card monitors the status, appropriateness, and effectiveness of MPA management planning and implementation schemes. All the covered LGUs were assisted in the conduct of METT evaluation. Average LGU METT rating in CY 2012 and in CY 2013 was 70% and 75% respectively.

(iii) Establishment of Municipal Coastal Database. With the assistance from the

Partnerships for Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA), partner LGUs were trained in the installation of the database for the coastal and marine environment. The Integrated Information Management System (IIMS) database, however, needs further enhancement to make it fully adoptable and operational at the LGU and DENR level.

18. A total of 14,959.46 hectares of combined mangrove and watershed plantations were reforested and/or rehabilitated. For mangrove conservation, a total of 4,354.58 hectares were planted out of the total target of 4,476.00 hectares (97.29%). For watershed conservation, a total of 10,604.88 hectares were planted out of the total target of 10,712.00 hectares (99.00%). There were about nine (9) mangrove sites which were also used as ecotourism destinations offering mangrove/river boating experiences. Table 2 shows the breakdown of mangrove and watershed rehabilitation and reforestation. Table 2. Breakdown of Mangrove and Watershed Rehabilitation and Reforestation

Conservation Activity Project Target in

Hectare *

Total Area Planted at end of project

% Planted

MANGROVE 4,476.00 4,354.58 97.29%

Rehabilitation 3,190.00 3,094.30 97%

Reforestation 1,286.00 1,260.28 98%

WATERSHED 10,712.00 10,604.88 99%

Rehabilitation 6,313.00 6,249.87 99%

Reforestation 4,399.00 4,355.01 99%

Total 15,188.00 14,959.46 98.5%

*The target area for mangrove was re-adjusted because results of the re-assessment disclosed that some areas for

mangroves are no longer suitable due to conditions of plantation sites like high salinity, acidity and extreme conditions.

19. In CY2012 and CY2013 the country was beset with typhoons and other incidents. About 655.77 hectares of mangrove plantations were damaged due to typhoons and oil spill. Another 2,911 hectares of watershed plantations were damaged by typhoons.


15

20. Biodiversity Conservation Projects. Biodiversity conservation activities are counter-measures to coastal degradation due to resource depletion and habitat losses. The implementation of the biodiversity conservation projects are through the MPA and MPA networks within the marine corridors and ecosystems. The project activities included training of People’s Organizations (POs1) in the planning, species stocking and after-stocking monitoring and evaluation. 21. Involvement of PO-MLGU in MPA based activities. Biodiversity conservation projects involved the participation of the community as co-implementor. The community participation evoked “ownership” of the project. Hence, the community voluntarily involved themselves in the monitoring and protection activities. This arrangement also facilitated the timely implementation of biodiversity conservation activities.

22. The project originally targeted 50 MPA-based conservation projects. A total of 51 proposals were finalized and considered for ICRMP funding. Of the 51 proposals, the two giant clam projects were not pursued due to the lack of juveniles as the sources of juveniles were affected by typhoon Yolanda in November 2013. Hence, only forty-nine (49) MPA-based biodiversity conservation projects were implemented. Species replenished/re-stocked by the project included giant clams, abalone, sea cucumber and other species. The Project also undertook three (3) coral transplantations. Annex 4 provides the list of biodiversity conservation sub-projects while Table 3 below presents the summary of re-stocked biodiversity species. Table 3. MPA-based Biodiversity Conservation

Region Total Target

Total Implemented

Giant Clam

Abalone Sea Cucumber

Coral Transplant

Mixed Species

Region 2 5 4 2 2

Region 3 9 11 4 3 1 3

Region 4B 2 2 1 1

Region 5 9 12 1 5 2 4

Region 7 21 15 5 10

Region 11 5 5 1 1 1 2

Total 51 49 11 4 11 3 20

23. The sub-projects are envisioned to facilitate the protection and effective local management of coastal eco-systems in selected threatened areas of high biodiversity. The re-stocking of particular species will later contribute in the rehabilitation of said ecosystems. These sites are also expected to be the future source of species for re-stocking in other areas. 24. Corridor-wide Biodiversity Conservation. The corridor-wide sub-projects were intended for the conservation and protection of biodiversity corridors and promotion of ecosystem-based approach to management of resources and MPA networking. Of the five (5) targeted corridor-wide biodiversity conservation, three (3) were implemented. Details are presented in Table 4 below.

Table 4. List of Corridor-wide Conservation Projects

Region Conservation Project Supported Corridor

Region 2 Humpback Whale Conservation Babuyan Corridor

Region 3 Conservation and Protection of Marine

Turtles in the Province of Zambales Zambales Marine Ecosystem

1 People’s Organizations or POs are independent, bona fide associations of citizens with demonstrated capacity

to promote the public interest and with identifiable leadership, membership and structure, as stated in Section 15, Philippine Constitution of 1987.


16

Region 4B Local Turtle Conservation Project Ticao Pass

Total 3 Corridor-Wide Projects

25. Population, Health and Environment (PHE) Information, Education and Communication (IEC) Campaign. The regional IEC campaigns on the interdependent relationship of population, health and environment (PHE) were undertaken in collaboration with the Population Commission (PopCom). About 4,400 community members and health workers were directly provided with seminars and workshops. Moreover, through broadcasting media (e.g. radio and TV guestings) and promotion through posters and major newspapers, the approximated reach-out was 39,500 community members. Further, the PHE Compendium, which presented the best practices and lessons learned from ICRMP and other related PHE experiences in the coastal communities was completed. COMPONENT C: ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AND INCOME DIVERSIFICATION

26. Project established six (6) Enterprise Development Units (EDUs) lodged at the Provincial Government Offices. The Project also completed the necessary training and provision of office equipment for the EDU staff. The EDUs established served as the training units in implementing capability building programs for the target SRGs.

27. SRG formation/strengthening. The Self Reliant Groups (SRGs2) were first provided with technical and institutional support to ensure viability and profitability of enterprises. The project conducted social preparation activities, training in community organization, needs and resource assessment and savings mobilization. 28. A total of 617 SRGs were assisted and trained in organization and management. The SRG members were provided with adequate technical skills which enabled them to seek livelihood activities or employment opportunities elsewhere. Of the 25,342 SRG members, 10,136 (40%) were women participants. Table 5 presents the breakdown of BFAR-led assisted SRGs.

Table 5. List of BFAR-led Assisted SRGs

REGION Total SRG organized and / or strengthened # Beneficiary Members

Cagayan 130 5,171

Zambales 83 1,376

Masbate 135 5,854

Cebu 125 4,728

Siquijor 62 5,338

Davao Oriental 82 2,875

TOTAL 617 25,342

29. Adoption of community organizing approach. Communities which were more receptive, cooperative and participative facilitated the timely implementation of ICRM activities and establishment of enterprises.

2 Self-Reliant Group is a small group of people (5 to 30) from a shared social background who support each

other. They were organized to learn livelihood skills and start small business to help them earn income and suppor

t themselves and their families.


17

30. Enterprise Development Framework. The development of the ED Framework provided for the adoption and implementation of market driven types of enterprises with effective capability building program and technical and institutional support mechanisms, resulting in environment-friendly demonstration projects which are sustainable. This has been the basis of the enterprise development team in providing assistance to the SRGs in the development of business plans and implementation of the enterprises. 31. BFAR-led Aquatic and Land based enterprise establishment. There were 345 business plans prepared and approved. Of these, 267 aquatic and land-based enterprises were established. Aquatic enterprises include tilapia culture, fish processing, mud crab fattening and sea transport. Land enterprises include duck raising, cattle raising, hog fattening, among others. There were 226 enterprises which were financed through the ICRMP funds and 41 enterprises financed through the BFAR regular funds. About 11,525 SRG members were provided with livelihood activities wherein 5,134 are women (44%). Annex 5 provides the complete list of aquatic and livelihood enterprises. (For updating) 32. DENR-led Ecotourism Enterprises. Ecotourism is a form of sustainable tourism to protect the natural environment, but still gain income from them. Ecotourism activities implemented under the Project promoted responsible travel with emphasis on experiences with nature through reef discovery (snorkeling and diving), forest adventure (trekking) and river/mangrove expedition (boating). 33. Ecotourism Guidelines. The early establishment of eco-tourism guidelines facilitated the timely completion of activities within the prescribed period. Hence, the sub-component was able to catch up and even exceed the targets. 34. SRG identification of enterprises. The demand-driven participatory approach was effective in facilitating the early identification of most appropriate enterprises for and by the SRGs. 35. There were 55 ecotourism enterprises established benefitting 1,118 SRG members. Of these beneficiaries, 372 are women (33.27%). Annex 6 provides the list of ecotourism enterprises while Table 6 below provides the summary of ecotourism sites and established enterprises. Annex 7, on the other hand, provides the profiles of the 22 ecotourism sites. Table 6. Ecotourism Sites Assisted

Region Reef Discovery Forest Adventure River/ Mangrove

Expedition

Total Ecotourism

Sites Assisted

Total Enterprise

Implemented

Region 2 Palaui Island Matarra Reef Taggat Lagoon

Portabaga Falls Cabicungan River 5 11

Region 3 San Salvador Island Hermana Menor Island

Panglit Island Dawey-dawey River

4 11

Region 5 Buntod Reef Matalang-Talang Reserve

Pawa Mangrove Tigbao Mangrove

4 8

Region 7 Olango Island

Cambais Falls Bojo River

Luyang Ecopark 4 11

Region 11 Dahican Beach Wariban Island

Mantunao Eco-park

Ban-ao Mangrove Luban Island

5 14

TOTAL 10 3 9 22 55


18

COMPONENT D: SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AND FACILITIES

36. This component addressed the basic social services needs of disadvantaged coastal communities and supported LGU efforts to mitigate coastal pollution and degradation of resources. The component adopted the demand-driven approach, whereby the municipal governments were directly responsible for the identification, prioritization and selection of priority social and environmental services and facilities. The LGUs lead in the design, implementation and monitoring of the infrastructure facilities.

37. Sub-project Invitation to LGUs to Participate. The ICRMP facilitated the conduct of LGU orientation workshops. The workshops were undertaken to familiarize LGUs on the requirements for accessing the ICRMP financing window through the Municipal Development Fund Office (MDFO). In June 2011, 30 of the 80 (37%) covered LGUs submitted their Letters of Intent (LOIs). 38. Creation of Sub-project teams. The creation of sub-project teams facilitated the preparation, completion of all required documents and implementation/construction of SESF. 39. Provision of Relevant Training to LGUs. The trainings provided by the project facilitated LGU understanding of project implementation guidelines. These training included project development, procurement procedures (with emphasis to adherence in FAPS requirements), financial management, construction supervision, operation and maintenance, social and environmental aspects, among others. 40. Preparation of Sub-Project Proposal. Series of workshops were conducted for the LGU preparation of subproject proposals. Templates were provided to LGUs during the pre-qualification and development of sub-project proposals. The LGUs, through the Municipal Planning and Development Offices (MPDOs), were involved in the identification and preparation of proposed facilities. 41. The active participation of other stakeholders (e.g. DPWH, NEDA, DOH for hospitals, EMB for sanitary landfill/MRCF, BLGF) facilitated the appropriate project designs and subsequent approval of the sub-projects by the Technical Working Groups of the respective Regional Steering Committees (TWG-RSC) and by the NEDA Regional Boards.

42. Of the 30 LGUs with LOIs, 27 LGUs were able to prepare SESF project proposals. However, only 18 of the 27 LGUs were qualified to enter into agreements with the Municipal Development Fund Office (MDFO) thru a Subproject Financing Agreement (SFA) or Accession Undertaking (AU). The reduction in the number of sub-projects was due to the inability of some of the LGUs to complete the documentary requirements and implementation of the sub-projects within the project period. 43. Sub-Project Financing Agreement and Accession Undertaking. There were eighteen (18) sub-projects in 17 LGUs which were facilitated with SFA/AUs. Of these 18 sub-projects, 14 LGUs were able to proceed with the construction of facilities with a total contracted amount of PhP228.188 Million. 44. Sub-project Construction. Of the 14 sub-projects with construction activities, thirteen (13) have completed construction works and are operational. Breakdown of the facilities are as follows: three (3) flood control related sub-projects, two (2) potable water supply related projects, two (2) wharfs and one (1) fishermen’s federation complex, two (2)


19

Materials Recovery and Composting Facilities (MRCFs), a hospital, a slaughterhouse, and a visitor’s information center. Annex 8 provides the profiles of each facility. Table 7 below provides the list of facilities and beneficiaries. Table 7. List of SESF Sub-projects

REGION FACILITY EXPECTED BENEFITS

Region 2 Riverbank Stabilization Structure in Claveria Municipal Hospital in Calayan

2,100 hectare agricultural land protected 1,524 households protected from flood 16,200 Residents provided access to primary health care

Region 3 2 Materials Recovery and Composting Facilities (MRCFs) in San Antonio and Candelaria Slaughterhouse in San Felipe

3,961 households with improved waste and sanitation

Region 5 Water Supply in Palanas Wharf in Mobo Fishermen’s Federation Complex in San Pascual

1,577 households with access to clean water 14 barangays and 2 neighboring municipalities 22 barangays with access to markets and trading

Region 7 Flood Control Structure in Carmen Municipal Wharf in Ronda

1,512 households protected from flood 4 barangays and 2 municipalities provided with transportation access

Region 11 Drainage System in Brgy. Poblacion in Cateel Water Supply in Boston Visitor’s Information Center in Mati City

5,060 households protected from flood 3,006 households with access to clean water The visitor’s center provided livelihood opportunities to approximately 5,000 individuals. The structure supports two (2) ecotourism sites in Mati City. The Dahican Beach and Waniban Island.

45. Sanitary Landfill in Palauig, Zambales was 53.94% completed. The completion of the MRCF building, the supply of MRCF equipment and the completion of gravel road network contributed to the achieved percentage. Reasons for non-completion of the LGU sub-project included the following: (i) change in location of the landfill cell; (ii) laxed construction method and practice; (iii) series of suspensions; (iv) amendment of Contract; (v) delayed submission of request for variation order/s. 46. Operations and Maintenance Trainings (OMT). To ensure continued operations, ICRMP conducted thirteen (13) LGU operations and maintenance training (OMT) for the SES facilities. Though the Sanitary Landfill sub-project in Palauig, Zambales was partially completed, ICRMP proceeded with the conduct of operation and maintenance training. C. Financial Performance 47. ICRMP financial performance as of February 2015 Financial Report, was pegged at 84.44%. On the ADB revised allocation of US$23.55 Million under the loan proceeds, the Project utilized a total amount of US$20.73 Million with utilization rate of 88.03%. With reference to the GEF grant allocation of US$9 Million, project spent a total amount of US$5.88 Million with utilization rate of 65.33%. The low grant utilization was due to the fact that the Project was not able to meet the ADB deadline for the liquidation of the Imprest Account. Under the GOP, the project utilized a total amount of US$8.23 Million from GOP allocation of US$8.71 Million for a utilization rate of 94.49%. Table 8 presents the ICRMP disbursements based on fund source. Annex 9 provides the financial performance per component while Annex 10 provides the financial performance per category.


20

Table 8. ICRMP Financial Performance Based on Fund Source

Source Original Allocation Revised Allocation Utilized Allocation

in US$ in Pesos in US$ in Pesos in US$ in Pesos Performance

ADB* 33.80 1,473.68 23.55 1,012.65 20.73 891.39 88.03%

GEF** 9.00 392.40 9.00 387.00 5.88 252.84 65.33%

GOP*** 8.71 379.76 8.71 374.53 8.23 353.89 94.49%

Total 51.51 2,245.84 41.26 1,774.18 34.84 1,498.12 84.44%

*ADB- Asian Development Bank ** GEF - Global Environmental Facility;

***GOP – Government of the Philippines (National Agency excluding counterpart of LGUs)

48. The participating LGUs have also provided substantial amount of counterpart contribution both in terms of salaries of staff involved in the project operations and implementation, office space and equipment, and cash contribution. In particular, under Component D, fourteen (14) LGUs were able to provide P43.86 Million ($1.02 Million @P43=$1) cash equity for the construction of social and environmental facilities. 49. The Project initially encountered problems in the operationalization of the financing scheme which affected financial performance. The adoption of financing ratios for each category consequently delayed initial fund releases. 50. The project was required to adopt the financing of the different categories from a combination of loan/grant and GOP counterpart. Different implementing units (Bureaus and regional offices) had difficulty in adopting the scheme the project required. This resulted in the initial difficulty in documentation, reporting and liquidation of fund disbursements as well as non-approval of some expenditures. This was later resolved through regular financial training and fund reconciliation workshops.

III. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

51. The ICRMP implementation was the collaboration between and among different national agencies like the DENR, DA-BFAR, DoF-MDFO and support of 79 covered Local Government Offices (LGUs), community stakeholders like bantay-dagat3, people’s organizations (POs) and self-reliant groups (SRGs). 52. Internal Coordination Mechanism. The internal coordination mechanisms were supported by the issuances of Special Orders (SO) assigning DENR- staff from Foreign Assisted and Special Projects Office (FASPO), Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB), and other offices to ICRMP. 53. To immediately start-up operations upon Project effectiveness, DENR created an ICRMP Project Steering Committee (PSC) in March 2007. The PSC was tasked to review and approve the Project’s Work and Financial Plans and policies/implementation guidelines. At the field level, the Regional Project Implementing Units (RPIUs) also created

3 Bantay Dagat, known as the Sea Patrol, are community-based, volunteer organizations in the Philippines that

work with local and national government officials and within 15 kilometers of the shore to protect the marine environment.


21

their respective Regional Steering Committees (RSC) to review and approve the regional Work and Financial Plans and evaluate the technical merits of the specific sub-projects. 54. To ensure the effective and efficient implementation of ICRMP, a Project Coordinating Office under the supervision of FASPO was established through Special Order (SO) No. 144 S. 2008. The Order defined the roles of different DENR Offices and focal points for each component as well as designation of a Project Coordinator to attend to day-to-day project operations. Table 9 presents the component implementation matrix. Table 9. Component Implementation Matrix

Responsible Office Component A Component B Component C Component D

Function Policy strengthening

ICRM/Biodiversity Enterprise Development

Social/ Environmental Facilities

Overall planning Programming Budgeting Monitoring & Management

FASPO PMO FASPO PMO FASPO PMO FASPO PMO

Technical Lead PAWB now BMB PAWB now BMB BFAR FASPO

Technical Support BFAR BFAR and LGUs PAWB R/PPIU/LGU

Financial Lead FASPO FASPO FASPO MDFO

Financial Support PAWB BFAR BFAR LGU

55. At the field, the Regional Project Implementing Units (RPIUs) were created through the Regional Special Orders (RSO), wherein the RPIU is divided into technical and support units. The RPIU was to oversee and monitor the over-all progress of ICRM Project implementation at the Regional level. The RPIU activities included the following: (i) establishment of RPIU linkages with the Regional BFAR, DILG, NEDA, DBM and LGUs; (ii) calling of regular RSC meetings and provision of technical support to the PPIU; (iii) supervision of regional project implementation and ensured active participation and involvement of project stakeholders; among others. 56. At the Provincial level, the Provincial Project Implementing Units (PPIUs) were involved in the following activities: (i) preparation of project work and financial plans and reports; (ii) implementation advocacy and Information, Education and Communication (IEC) programs; (iii) participation in the review and approval process of sub-projects; (iv) monitoring and evaluation of project progress; and (v) ensure the participation of all stakeholders in project implementation. 57. External Coordination Mechanism. The external coordinating mechanisms for the implementation of the ICRMP were supported by the signing of Memorandum of Agreements (MOAs), such as: a) MOA between the DENR and DA-BFAR for the participation of BFAR in the implementation of some activities under components B and C; b) MOA between the DENR and the Department of Finance (DoF)-MDFO for the implementation of component D; and c) MOA between the DENR and PEMSEA for the coastal database undertaking. 58. Challenge in initial project orientation. The Project had a broad scope of work and covered dispersed geographical area (6 regions, 7 provinces, 80 LGUs nationwide), involving numerous implementing units (i.e. DENR Central Office to the Community Environmental and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) level), DA-BFAR, DOF-MDFO, Academic Institutions like the UP MERF and Silliman University, and various people’s organizations. In the adoption of participatory approach in implementation, the Project took more than a year to properly orient, familiarize and organize these groups about the project goal and implementing arrangements.


22

IV. LOAN COVENANT AGREEMENTS 59. All agreements in the Loan Covenant with the ADB were complied and satisfied as indicated in Annex 11. These include the agreements on ICRMP compliance to ADB social safeguards requirements particularly for affected peoples as well as indigenous peoples. The Project also acted on compliance to environmental pre-requisites prior to sub-project SESF construction and implementation. 60. Social Safeguards Templates. For Components B and C, the Project prepared a template for inventory of social safeguards. ICRMP conducted inventory of social safeguards focused on Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and Indigenous Peoples (IP) covering land acquisition, improvements present on the land (i.e. crops, trees, livelihood assets and structures, etc.), informal settlers and ancestral domains. The Project ensured that the rights of the affected persons were upheld. Based on safeguards evaluation, the effects on Involuntary Resettlements (IR) and Indigenous Peoples (IPs) were found insignificant. 61. Social Safeguards Compliance on SESF. For Component D, there were no objections received for the SESF sub-projects. Nevertheless, ICRMP still pursued ADB compliance with social safeguards requirements for the seventeen (17) sub-projects with agreements. The reports facilitated the ADB issuance of No Objection Letters (NOL) for the sub-projects. Activities included (i) conduct of orientation in the collection, collation and analysis of social safeguards; (ii) conduct of focused group discussions (FGDs) and interviews of affected communities; and (iii) collection of documentation compliance certificates. SESF project sites did not occupy any ancestral lands and domains, hence, considerations on IPs’ assets and structures were found insignificant. None of the projects also encroached on private lots and were not occupied by informal settlers. All the Regional ICRMP Centers (RIC) sub-project facilities were all located within the university compound and were constructed in open and unoccupied spaces. 62. Integration of Gender Dimension. In compliance to gender participation in all the activities conducted in the project, ICRMP prepared a template for inventory of gender, which disaggregated gender data. This aspect specifically accounted for the male and female membership in organizations, as board members, and attendance in trainings conducted through ICRMP. Inclusion of gender dimension improved the generation of reports. Based on gender dimension evaluation, there were more than 33% women participation in ICRMP. It is estimated that of the 32,937 PO/SRG members, about 12,845 (39%) are women. Further, it is approximated that of the 4,499 PO officers, about 1,664 (36.98%) are women. Attached as Annex 12 is the report on Social Safeguards and Gender Dimenrsion. 63. Procurement in accordance with ADB Guidelines. All goods and related services financed under the ADB loan and GEF grant were procured in accordance with the ADB’s Procurement Guidelines. The list of equipment is included in Annex 13.

V. PROJECT EVALUATION

A. Project Relevance 64. The project achievements have contributed in the overall government’s efforts on environment and natural resources development as embodied in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP 2011-2016) through the following: 65. Contributed to the DENR - National Greening Program (NGP) through reforestation and rehabilitation of 14,959.46 hectares of mangrove and watershed plantations.


23

66. Contributed in the protection and conservation of biodiversity through the established/strengthened MPAs and MPA networks. 67. Introduced environment-friendly enterprises and livelihood opportunities in support to the government’s goal to address poverty while motivating community to protect habitat and wildlife. 68. Improved environmental quality for a cleaner and healthier environment. The Project contributed to ENR4 compliance with Republic Act (RA) 9003 or Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 through facilitation in the construction of three (3) waste disposal facilities. B. Project Effectiveness 69. Milestones as indicated in the Design Monitoring Framework. Almost all the committed activities were executed. Annex 14 provides the details of the achievements per milestones. 70. Greater LGU involvement in ICRM planning and implementation has improved the capacities of the local governments in addressing local coastal and marine concerns. As evidenced in the GSA rating, the ICRMP interventions contributed in improving the performance level of covered LGUs in environmental governance, from 76.15% in CY 2011 to 90.85% in CY 2013 respectively. The rating categorized the LGUs under the GOOD PERFORMING LGUs. Further, METT scores showed similar increase in trend from 70% in 2012 to 75% in CY 2013 which indicated effective MPA management planning and implementation. 71. Through the development of ICRM Plans and MPA Plans, project facilitated the increased LGU allocation of funds for ICM activities. In CY 2011, there were 70 participating LGUs which have passed their respective Resolutions/Ordinances allocating funds for ICRM activities, ranging from P200,000 – P 2,000,000. 72. Income generation in enterprises. Through the aquatic/land based enterprises, the

SRGs gained income which ranges from P10,000 – P30,000 per month. Individual SRG member income increment ranges from P500 – P2,000 per month. 73. Income generation in ecotourism. Through the implementation of ecotourism enterprises, the SRGs gained additional income. From the guide-ship enterprises during peak season (March – May), the SRGs’ average gross income approximates to about PhP60,000.00 per month. The take-home pay of the reef/river/mangrove guides was estimated at P1,500 per month each. 74. There were also 17 culinary enterprises under ecotourism. The SRGs’ approximated gross income during peak season was PhP25,000 per month. Individual SRG member income increment ranges from P500 – P1,500 per month during peak season. These activities relieved pressure on coastal resources, thus promoting protection and preventing their deterioration. 75. The cost-sharing scheme adopted for the social and environmental facilities, promoted greater involvement of the local government units as demonstrated by the LGUs’ initiative to provide local counterpart funds ranging from 20% - 40%. The scheme also

4 ENR – Environment and Natural Resources


24

enhanced local participation in sub-project implementation and ownership of these ICRM initiatives. C. Project Efficiency 76. The Project was mobilized and implemented through the existing DENR central, regional and provincial organizations and through the collaboration with other agencies including the DA-BFAR and MDFO. The development of sub-projects and related activities were undertaken adopting the participatory process. All concerned stakeholders like the local government units, people’s organizations, and marine science institutions were enjoined to participate in planning, sub-project design and actual implementation. 77. On project costing, there may have been an over-estimation of budget for some activities which may have affected financial performance. To cite an example, project allocation for biodiversity conservation was computed at PhP563.17 Million. Actual requirement based on generated project proposals was PhP49.77 Million creating an allocation surplus of PhP513.4 Million. Likewise, for the 345 aquatic and land-based enterprises, project allocation was PhP576 Million. Based on the approved project proposals, actual requirement was calculated at PhP118.4 Million thereby generating unexpected surplus of PhP437.6 Million. 78. With reference to project schedule, the Project was able to catch up with all the major milestones within the last two years of implementation. ICRMP only experienced slow movement in operation during the first two years due to complex project design and financing ratio. These initial concerns were consequently addressed through the conduct of extensive orientation and workshops with the project finance staff and LGUs. The detailed per milestone schedule and actual implementation is presented in Annex 15. 79. Under Component D, SESF implementation made considerable progress in physical and financial performance in 2013 - 2014 with the lifting of construction suspensions and adoption of the “Direct Payment Scheme.” The scheme enabled the LGUs to directly liquidate the funds to ADB. D. Sustainability and Way Forward 80. Incentives/Disincentives. The proposed draft Orders on incentives/disincentive systems were favorably reviewed by the TWG5 (composed of representatives from DENR, DILG and DA-BFAR). DENR through BMB will follow-up consultations in the pursuance of final endorsement by the DENR, DA and DILG. 81. Proposed studies for adoption. The recommendations in the studies under Component A, e.g. Users’ Fee Study may be pilot tested in selected LGUs wherein the results may be used as basis for adoption and replication. 82. Continued Coordination of the DENR RPIUs with the RICs. The coordination of the DENR RPIUs with the RICs may be continued. The linkage with RICs may be beneficial particularly for the conduct of scientific assessment of biodiversity sites and monitoring of biodiversity conservation activities undertaken by ICRMP.

5 TWG – Technical Working Group composed of representatives from the DENR, DA-BFAR and DILG reviewed

the technical merits of the policy studies and proposed draft Orders


25

83. Continued Coordination of the DENR RPIUs with the MPA organizations/MPA networks. The established linkage of DENR with the MPA organizations and MPA networks may be continued. The cooperation will be beneficial to the DENR particularly for the generation of biodiversity status reports and conduct of future biodiversity related activities. 84. Continued conduct of GSA and METT and adoption of EIMM tool. The DENR may establish a mechanism to institutionalize the regular conduct of GSA and METT to the ICRMP LGUs. The continued conduct of GSA and METT in LGUs may be necessary to monitor ICM activities and document the occurring improvements within the municipalities. The GSA and METT tools may be institutionalized through issuance of BMB policies and integrated in regular RPIU activities. The BMB may also assist the LGUs in monitoring the impact of ICRM activities in their jurisdiction, using the EIMM tool developed under the Project. 85. Continued monitoring of the ICRMP initiated activities. The DENR may continue the monitoring activities in the mangrove and watershed plantations as contribution in the National Greening Program (NGP). The DENR may also continue the monitoring activities in the biodiversity conservation project sites to ensure that the conservation activities are maintained and sustained. Monitoring of the biodiversity undertaking may be funded under the Sustainable Coral Reef Ecosystem Management Program (SCREMP), a regular project of the Biodiversity Management Bureau (BMB). 86. Continued monitoring of Land and Aquatic Enterprises established under ICRMP. The DA-BFAR should continue the regular monitoring of the ICRMP assisted land and aquatic enterprises. Whenever necessary, DA-BFAR may further provide technical assistance in these enterprises to ensure continued SRG operations and make the established enterprises sustainable. 87. Continued monitoring of ecotourism enterprises. The DENR may continue to monitor the ecotourism enterprise operations. This is to ensure that the business plans are being adopted by the SRG members. 88. Continued monitoring of the social facilities. The 13 sub-projects completed through ICRMP may be continuously monitored to assess if the LGUs are able to operate the facilities, and determine if the ten (10) sub-projects which are expected to generate income are showing indications that they are earning and will be able to recover investments as originally intended. 89. Completion of the Sanitary Landfill in Palauig, Zambales. The Sanitary Landfill sub-project needs to be completed to be able to utilize the facility. To ensure the completion of the structure, the LGU may coordinate with MDFO and explore the possibility of availing other loan windows and options. As of this date, the LGU has committed to continue the construction through their regular funds. E. Impact 90. Experience in ADB projects. There were 14 LGUs which gained experience in the project conceptualization, development, procurement and implementation of foreign-funded projects like ADB. The experience may be useful in their future infrastructure undertakings. 91. Piloting of RICs. The Project piloted the establishment of Regional ICRM Centers (RIC). The CSU in Region 2 and DOSCST in Davao Oriental had shown progress and development in operation. The CSU has prepared project proposals for possible funding


26

under small grants by other foreign-funding institutions. The possible support may ensure their continued operation. Meanwhile, the DOSCST in Region 11 has shown capability in research through the completion of four (4) studies related to baseline and benchmarking of Pujada Bay. The lessons gained from the experience may be useful in the establishment of RICs in other regions. 92. There are about 25,000 SRG members provided with skills training which would give them the chance to seek better employment opportunities outside their community. 93. Social and environmental awareness of SRGs. Through the formation and strengthening of the Self Reliant Groups (SRGs), their social awareness was enhanced. They now participate in decision making and problem solving activities. Particularly for Region 11, the LGU and SRG of Ban-ao, Baganga sought assistance from the International Labor Organization (ILO) when their eco-tourism facilities were rendered unserviceable due to typhoon Pablo in 2012. The ILO support was used in the establishment of furniture making enterprise using the fallen mangrove trees and other driftwoods. F. Lessons Learned 94. Adoption of Financing Ratios. The complex financing ratio was found be more complex than pre-conceived/intended. The scheme required extensive financial orientation, familiarization and review of all stakeholders prior to project implementation. Based on the experience, the scheme was not easy to implement. Moreover, the early conduct of financial management and planning orientations/seminars/workshops prior to implementation could have facilitated the timely opening of accounts, downloading and disbursements. 95. Preparation of Project Operations Manual. The Project was not able to prepare the Project Operations Manual. The Project Operations Manual may have facilitated the timely conduct of start-up activities and provided guidance to project operations. 96. Separate Imprest Accounts for DENR and DA-BFAR. The Project could have separated the accounts of DENR and DA-BFAR and might have possibly improved disbursements. 97. DoT involvement in ecotourism. For the eco-tourism enterprises, the Department of Tourism (DoT) may have been involved as co-implementing agency for the development of the ecotourism demonstration sites. Considering DoT’s mandate in tourism, they could provide extensive promotion as well as technical assistance in the operation and management of tourism sites and linkaging with hotels, travel tours, information dissemination, etc. 98. DTI involvement in land enterprises. Particularly for land-based livelihood enterprises, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) could have participated as co-implementing agency. The DTI could have linked the SRGs with other players in the commodity value chain. 99. LGU commitment to participate. The LGU commitment to participate should be factored as criteria for priority municipalities considering the impact of their contribution in the Project’s success. Particularly for infrastructure component, the readiness of the LGUs to prepare the necessary documents like feasibility study and Detailed Engineering Designs (DEDs) should be immediately considered.


27

100. Flexibility in target LGUs. Particularly for component D, only 30 of the 68 LGUs were qualified to participate based on their financial capacity. This indicated that at the onset, the project may not meet its LGU target. Future projects may provide more flexibility in the establishment of criteria to enable participation of the intended clientele, for this case, the 5th & 6th class municipalities6. 101. Regular monitoring during construction. Particularly for Component D – SESF, the RPIU may regularly provide the LGU with monitoring updates regarding progress of construction of subprojects, copy furnished the Contractor. The LGU and the DENR may immediately confer and agree on next activities to avoid and/or reduce implementation slippages. G. Recommendations 102. Involvement of the Regional ICRMP Centers (RICs) in biodiversity conservation undertakings. The participation of the RICs is crucial for the subsequent assessment, monitoring and evaluation of the biodiversity conservation project impact on MPA sites. The Regional ICRMP Centers can be tapped to lead in the biodiversity conservation monitoring activities considering their technical understanding in coastal assessment and monitoring. 103. Complete the establishment of IIMS. To make IIMS fully operational at the LGU and DENR offices, continued coordination meetings with PEMSEA may be pursued. 104. Financing for the remaining approved land and aquatic enterprises. There are 78 sub-project proposals prepared, reviewed and approved which are ready for financing. The BFAR may consider financing the remaining aquatic-based enterprises and endorse the land-based enterprises to the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Bureau of Small and Medium Enterprises (BSME). 105. Ecotourism Site Promotion. While the project provided the necessary start-up activities for the 22 ecotourism sites, they need further promotion to increase influx of tourists and ensure continued operation. The ICRMP sites may be endorsed to the respective DoT - Regional Ecotourism Committees for assistance in promotion and other support activities. 106. Conduct of Operation and Maintenance Training for the Visitor’s Center in Mati, Davao Oriental. The remaining operations and maintenance training for the Visitor’s Center in Mati, Davao Oriental needs to be pursued to ensure the operation of the visitors’ center. The DENR Region XI may coordinate with the operators of the Palaui Visitors Center7 in Cagayan province and link them with Mati LGU. The Mati LGU may further seek technical assistance from other agencies relative to the operation of their service facility.

6 1

st class municipality average annual income is above P55Million; 2

nd class municipality ave. annual income is

between P45M-P55M; 3rd

class municipality is P35M-P45M; 4th

class municipality is P25M-P35M; 5th

class municipality is P15M – P25M while 6

th class is below P15 Million

7 Palaui Visitors’ Center is being operated by the Cagayan Export Zone Authority (CEZA)


28

List of Annexes: Annex 1. Location of ICRMP LGUs and Selected LGUs with Ridge-to-Reef Intervention Annex 2. List of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) Annex 3. List of Scientific Researches and Studies Annex 4. List of Biodiversity Conservation Projects Annex 5. List of Aquatic and Land-Based Enterprises (For updating) Annex 6 List of Ecotourism Enterprises Annex 7. Profiles of 22 Ecotourism Sites Annex 8. Profiles of 13 Social and Environmental Services and Facilities (SESF) Annex 9. Financial Performance per Component Annex 10. Financial Performance per Category Annex 11. Loan Covenant Agreements Annex 12. Report on Social Safeguards and Gender Dimension Annex 13. List of Equipment Annex 14. Project Outputs based on Design Monitoring Framework Annex 15. Implementation Target and Actual Schedule

Documents

ICRMP Project Completion Reportfaspselib.denr.gov.ph/sites/default/files... · SPPT Sub-Project Proposal Team SRG Self-Reliant Groups SU Silliman University ... Integrated Coastal